PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information

Transcription

1 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Country FYR Macedonia Sector Water Project submission Date Project title 15 th June 25 Project Code (filled by the REC) Wastewater Treatment Plant for the City of Veles MA-3 A-1.1 A-1 Information about foreseen implementing agency Name Municipality of Veles, Local Self- Government A-1.2 Address Panko Brasnar 1, 14 Veles, Republic of Macedonia A-1.3 Phones ; A-1.4 Faxes A-1.5 s rcppveles@netscape.net opstinaveles@mt.net.mk; knastevski@yahoo.com A-1.6 Person responsible for contacts with the Ministry/Fund Kosta Nastevski, Petar Stojanov A-1.7 Name and function of person responsible for overall project implementation Kosta Nastevski, head of environment and infrastructure Dept. A-1.8 Legal status of the implementing agency Local Government of Veles A-1.9 Institutions/firms jointly implementing the project (if any) Regional Cleaner Production Center Veles A-1.1 What is the division of responsibilities (if joint implementation) Supervision in equipment choosing and installation, its initial start-up, staff training, performance and process control A-2 Strategic context VH- very high; H- high; M- medium; L- low; VL very low; N- none (mark where appropriate) VH H M L VL N A2-1 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on regional level? X A2-2 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on country level? X A2-3 Does an up-to-date country strategy in this sector exist? Yes No A2-4 Does an up-to-date country action plan in this sector exist? Yes No A2-5 What is the project (idea) priority from the regional scale point of view? X A2-6 What priority is allocated to project (idea) on a country level? X A2-7 What is the project (idea) priority from the cross border cooperation point of view? X REReP 1.2 project (idea) template

2 A2-8 What is the project (idea) priority from the local point of view? X A2-9 What is the project (idea) priority from the human health protection point of view? X A2-1 What is the project (idea) priority from the country economy point of view? X A2-11 What is the project (idea) priority from the ecosystem point of view? X A-3 Information about the project A3.1 Short description of the environmental problem The town of Veles is located in the central part of FYR Macedonia and it has 47. inhabitants. It is one of the biggest industrial centers in the country. The River Vardar flows through the town and separates it in two parts. 65% of the population lives on the right side of the river, and 35% on the left side. The total municipal and industrial wastewater is discharged directly into the River Vardar without any treatment. It directly influences the increase of the water pollution in the river. This is a very serious environmental problem and its solution is a top priority. A3.2 Origins and positive environmental impact of the project A3.2.1 Description of factors that inspired the project (driving forces) A3.2.2 Project main goal and objectives Pollution loading of the River Vardar has become unendurable. Citizen s protest against not solving environment problems (Veles is most polluted city in the country). Inhabitants in the River neighboring settlements supply water from draw wells located nearby the Vardar River (with extremely bad quality of the water). They also need cleaner water for irrigation. Vardar is an international river and there is contribution to crossborder environment impact. Pollution prevention of the River Vardar. Improvement of the living conditions (hygienic and health) for the local habitants. Construction of: Two urban collectors (on both sides of the river); Main collector which takes the wastewater at about 2.5 km downstream from the town; Wastewater treatment plant with technological processes that satisfies the standards of the EU Directive for wastewater treatment 97/271/EEC. A3.2.3 Expected positive environmental effects A3.2.4 Health impact of the project The River Vardar will be protected from pollution. Pollution of the draw wells located nearby the Vardar River will be decreased. Irrigation water from the River Vardar will be cleaner. Better hygienic and living conditions in the town of Veles and the settlements downstream of the River. Less polluted River will result in less polluted draw wells and reduced risks of epidemics. A3.2.5 Size of population benefiting from the project implementation A3.2.6 Scale of impact 5. citizens of Veles 15. citizens downstream of the Vardar River (in Macedonia and in Northern Greece). Regional Local Country Cross border (County) Local X X X X X A3.3 Project status Performance [%] Start [MM/YY] End [MM/YY] A Pre-feasibility study 1 A Feasibility study 1 8/3 12/3 A Detail engineering designs 1/4 3/4 REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 1

3 A EIA 5/3 8/3 A Permits 4/4 6/4 A Financing 7/3 12/5 A Procurements 5/4 7/4 A Construction 7/4 12/4 A Start of operation and training staff 1/5 3/5 A Operation 1/5 - A Description of critical factors affecting project implementation: - Luck of funds - Luck of detailed engineering designs PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part B Water & Waste water B Technical and environmental information on project B-1 Project type B1.1 Project type: End-of pipe Completely new facility B1.2 Technical description For complete solution to the municipality wastewater problem in the City of Veles it is necessary to built the following: - Construction of two urban collectors (on the left and the right side of the river), which collect the entire amount of the wastewater from the town and connect downstream; - Main collector which takes the wastewater at about 2.5km downstream from the town; - Wastewater treatment plant, which technological processes should satisfy the standards of the EU Directive for wastewater treatment 97/271/EEC. - fully automated wastewater treatment plant - It will be able to perform aerobic biologic treatment within the European legislative standards m3/day wastewater will be treated - < 2mg/l Solid parts B1.3 Project location(s) (exact address) Municipality of Veles, Panko Brasnar 1, 14 Veles, FYR Macedonia B1.4 Location from the environmental impact point of view (mark where appropriate) Hot spots x Downtown area and/or specially protected areas Other densely populated areas Loosely populated areas B-2 Status of the ownership title to land and buildings (mark where appropriate)) B2.1 Settled x B2.2 Not settled B2.3 Under settlement (describe status) B-3 Category of a technological solution proposed (mark where appropriate) B3.1 Modern X B3.2 Modern, not widely implemented REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 2

4 B3.3 Traditional B3.4 Old B-4 Pressure on environment Type of result Unit Before project After project B4.1 Population served (water supply) B4.2 Quality of drinking water ( or equivalent according to local law) B4.3 Population served (wastewater) [-] 47, B4.4 WWTP capacity m 3 /d 15, B4.5 Collected wastewater m 3 /d N/A 15, B4.6 Treated wastewater m 3 /d 15, B4.7 Avg. BOD 5 ( (c) permitted = 4. mg/l O 2 ) mg/l B4.8 Avg. COD 5 ( (c) permitted = for Class II ) mg/l N/A 2. B4.9 Avg. Suspension ( (c) permitted = 1-3 ) mg/l 1 3 B4.1 Avg. N total ( (c) permitted = 1-25 ) mg/l N/A 25 B4.11 Avg. P total ( (c) permitted = ) mg/l N/A N/A B4.12 Sludge amount after the stabilization and drainage m 3 /a B4.13 Waste and sludge management/treatment Yes/No No Yes B-5 Evidence of the reduction of pressure on environment (mark where appropriate) B5.1 By direct emission monitoring X B5.2 By technical specification of equipment B5.3 Other, e.g. input characteristics (give a description) B5.4 None B-6 Stakeholders opinion (mark where appropriate) B6.1 Positive attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs X B6.2 Positive attitude of authorities, public protests B6.3 Public opinion not informed B6.4 Project known, attitudes neutral B6.5 Negative attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs B6.6 Opinions not known REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 3

5 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part C Financial information C Financial information on project C-1 Investment outlays [ ] 13,76. EUR C-2 Operating costs and revenues due to project implementation [ ] Before project Total operating costs Total operating revenues C-3 Operating capital [ ] Demand for working capital C-4 Financing sources [ ] Total After project After project C4.1 Own sources C4.2 Grants Disbursed Committed Planned % 13,76. C4.3 Soft Loans C4.4 Loans with subsidized interest C4.5 Private sector C4.6 Other (please specify) C4.7 Total 13, C.5 Financing schedule [ ] Planned Sources Own Other Total Year Activity C.4.1 C42- C4.6 C Total Preparation phase Construction Total REC PEIP project reference number What is the project (idea) priority from addressing an environmental threat of regional importance? Is the project linked to the EU acquis? If yes, which EU directive? MA-3 Pollution loading of the River Vardar has become unendurable. Citizen s protest against not solving environment problems (Veles is most polluted city in the country). Inhabitants in the River neighboring settlements supply water from draw wells located near by the Vardar River (with extremely bad quality of the water). They also need cleaner water for irrigation. Vardar is international river and there is contribution in crossborder environment impact. EU "Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive" C-4 Need for financing REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 4

6 C-4.1 C-4.2 C-4.3 Technical Assistance: describe the technical assistance needed give the estimated cost Investment co-financing: describe the elements for which grant financing is needed give the amount of grant needed Loan financing: specify the capital investment elements for which loan financing is sought give the amount of loan needed Detailed engineering designs - Construction of two urban collectors (on the left and the right side of the river), which collect the complete amount of the wastewater from the town and connect downstream; - Main collector which takes the wastewater at about 2.5km downstream from the town; - Wastewater treatment plant, whose technological processes should satisfy the standards of the EU Directive for wastewater treatment 97/271/EEC. - fully automated wastewater treatment plant - It will be able to do aerobic biologic treatment within the European legislative standards m3/day wastewater will be treated < 2mg/l Solid parts Amount of grant: 13,76. EUR / C-4.4 Describe the implementation schedule by years Preparation phase: EUR Construction: 12,6. EUR Implementation from C-5 If the loan is foreseen, please provide information indicated below C-5.1 Who will be the borrower? / C-5.2 Who will guarantee the loan (if / relevant)? C-5.3 Describe the borrower: / key activities, current tariffs structure, plans for tariffs increase, accounts for the previous 2 years and budget for next year C-5.4 Describe the municipality (if / relevant): accounts for the previous 2 years and budget for next year, existing long-term obligations, city budget, current surplus etc. C-5.5 Affordability forecast / REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 5

7 REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 6