PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form

Transcription

1 Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Country Macedonia Sector WATER Project submission Date Project title 21 April 2003 Project Code (filled by the REC) MA-26 CONSTRUCTION OF COMBINED WWTP IN THE PIG FARM, GRADSKO A-1.1 A-1.3 A-1.5 A-1.7 A-1.9 Name Bioengineering Doo A-1 Information about foreseen implementing agency Phones s bioing@yahoo.com Name and function of person responsible for overall project implementation Ivan Kungulovski, Director Institutions/firms jointly implementing the project (if any) A-1.2 A-1.4 A-1.6 A-1.8 A-1.10 Address Bul. Partizanski odredi 117/II-1, 1000 Skopje, Faxes Person responsible for contacts with the Ministry/Fund Ivan Kungulovski Legal status of the implementing agency (F) Private companies What is the division of responsibilities (if joint implementation) A-2 Strategic context VH- very high; H- high; M- medium; L- low; VL very low; N- none (mark where appropriate) VH H M L VL N A2-1 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on regional level? X A2-2 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on country level? X A2-3 Does an up-to-date country strategy in this sector exist? Yes No A2-4 Does an up-to-date country action plan in this sector exist? Yes No A2-5 What is the project (idea) priority from the regional scale point of view? X A2-6 What priority is allocated to project (idea) on a country level? X A2-7 What is the project (idea) priority from the cross border cooperation point of view? X A2-8 What is the project (idea) priority from the local point of view? X A2-9 What is the project (idea) priority from the human health protection point of view? X A2-10 What is the project (idea) priority from the country economy point of view? X A2-11 What is the project (idea) priority from the ecosystem point of view? X A-3 Information about the project REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 0

2 A3.1 Short description of the environmental problem Current data regarding the operating conditions of the Gradsko Pig Farm show that the operation of the manure washout system has deeply adverse impact on the environment. The wastewater containing great amounts of dry matter is directly discharged into the river Vardar, without any previous treatment. The existing system for manure collection consists of concrete lagoons operating as settlers. However, only the large particles are held. The original idea for this system was to collect the wastewater until the lagoons are filled out and than to dry out the dry matter, simply by evaporation. The dried matter than would be used as an fertilizer. However, because of the low capacity of these concrete lagoons, the system is out of work for a long time. The principle idea in designing the wastewater treatment plant for the Gradsko Pig Farm was the need of a system involving minimum equipment and personnel and integrating the existing facilities. This would make the system efficient and low-cost investment. The preparation of the technical documentation of the proposed system would be greatly supported by the Bioengineering from Skopje, a firm with a long experience in operating this type of systems, as well as by the fundamental research conducted by the Laboratory of Microbiology at the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics in Skopje. In addition, this system exploits the great experience of the Leroy Sharp Farms for California, USA, since they operate an anaerobic lagoon-system for many years. Especially important would be the experience gained by the operation of the first system of its kind in Macedonia build for the pig farm in Rzanicino and its Slaughter House, near Skopje. A3.2 Origins and positive environmental impact of the project A3.2.1 Description of factors that inspired the project (driving forces) - A3.2.2 Project main goal and objectives A3.2.3 expected positive environmental effects A3.2.4 Health impact of the project A3.2.5 Size of population benefiting from the project implementation A3.2.6 Scale of impact Need of appropriate WWTP. The presence of diseases Contamination of the environment. The addiction of our country form import of inappropriate technologies. Construction of WWTP in Gradsko Pig Farm and permanent answer of the problem with the treatment of the urban wastewaters. Demonstration of new, combined technologies for wastewater treatment in the rural areas. Development of our own technology. Usage of our own equipment. Employment of unemployed society. Expansion of the industrial effort, and development of new and modern biotechnological steps for wastewater treatment. Improves the hygienic and sanitary conditions of the effluent Uses bio catalyst for improving the efficiency in reducing the organic matter High degree of utilisation It operates at low costs and is simple for maintenance. Permanent solution of the problem with the treatment of wastewaters in Gradsko Pig Farm. Protection of the environment in the region and wider from the negative impact of the wastewaters. Balanced progress of the region Protection of the citizens from contagious diseases Production of healthy food Improved quality of life Regional Local Country Cross border (County) Local H H VH H VH A3.3 Project status Performance [%] Start [MM/YY] End [MM/YY] A Pre-feasibility study A Feasibility study /2003 A Detail engineering designs A EIA 0, A Permits 1, A Financing 1, A Procurements 5, A Construction 70, A Start of operation and training staff A Operation A Description of critical factors affecting project implementation: Luck of funds REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 1

3 Part B Water & Waste water B Technical and environmental information on project B-1 Project type B1.1 Project type Completely new facility B1.2 Technical description The project will give the technical and technological solutions for wastewater treatment of the Gradsko Pig Farm operating with pigs per annum in two turns and with nurses. With respect to the previously explained facts, the Gradsko Pig Farm, Veles, adopted a program for construction of a wastewater treatment plant based on an anaerobic lagoon-system (ALS). The effluent contains small amounts of organic matter, which allows direct discharge into the River Vardar, or it can be used for irrigation. This system operates with an influent loaded with small amounts of organic matter, which is the main precondition for operation in psychrophilic conditions. On the other hand, this enables utilisation of the organic matter as high as 80%, which cannot be done by the other lagoon-systems. Indirect indicator of the efficiency of this system is the methane content in the biogas, which on average amounts about 65%. This biogas can be converted into heat or electricity power, which compensates the operating costs of the system. The daily biogas production is expected at m 3 /pig, or in other words, the annual average would be 0.41 m 3 m 2 per day maintenance of the anaerobic conditions in the first lagoon. The wastewater treatment plant is consisted of 4 ground lagoons. One deep, and so-called anaerobic, 2 shallow facultative-anaerobic and one for accumulation. The wastewaters in the collecting pool with the volume of 30m 3 are canalised trough protection metal grid, which helps with the protection from solid wastes and objects from the pig farm. From there, the water forced by gravity moves to the anaerobic lagoon. The geometry of the primary lagoon provides stabile temperature conditions for operation of the anaerobic psyhrophilic fermentation, with the retention time of 50 days. With the planned covering of the lagoon with foil from PVC, collection of the released gas will be provided. From the anaerobic lagoon the water forced by gravity moves into two geometrically equivalent so-called stabilisation or facultative lagoons, which are connected in between. The retention time of the water in these lagoons is several hours, so the process of nitrification and de-nitrification can be finished. The water from these lagoons forced by gravity moves into the accumulation from where part of the water is drained into the recipient and part is recycled for the uses of the farm. B1.3 Project location(s) (exact address) Pig farm, s. Gradsko, Community Veles, Veles, Macedonia B1.4 Location from the environmental impact point of view (mark where appropriate) Hot spots X Downtown area and/or specially protected areas Other densely populated areas Loosely populated areas B-2 Status of the ownership title to land and buildings (mark where appropriate) B2.1 Settled X B2.2 Not settled B2.3 Under settlement (describe status) B-3 Category of a technological solution proposed (mark where appropriate) B3.1 Modern X B3.2 Modern, not widely implemented B3.3 Traditional B3.4 Old B-4 Pressure on environment Type of result Unit Before project After project B4.1 Population served (water supply) B4.2 Quality of drinking water ( or equivalent according to local law) B4.3 Population served (wastewater) B4.4 WWTP capacity m 3 /d B4.5 Collected wastewater m 3 /d B4.6 Treated wastewater m 3 /d / 750 REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 2

4 B4.7 Avg. BOD 5 ( (c) permitted =25 ) mg/l B4.8 Avg. COD 5 ( (c) permitted = 100 ) mg/l B4.9 Avg. Suspension ( (c) permitted = 30 ) mg/l B4.10 Avg. N total ( (c) permitted = 15 ) mg/l B4.11 Avg. P total ( (c) permitted = 2 ) mg/l B4.12 Sludge amount after the stabilization and drainage m 3 /10 y 3000 B4.13 Waste and sludge management/treatment Yes/No No Yes B-5 Evidence of the reduction of pressure on environment (mark where appropriate) B5.1 By direct emission monitoring X B5.2 By technical specification of equipment B5.3 Other, e.g. input characteristics (give a description) B5.4 None B-6 Stakeholders opinion (mark where appropriate) B6.1 Positive attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs X B6.2 Positive attitude of authorities, public protests B6.3 Public opinion not informed B6.4 Project known, attitudes neutral B6.5 Negative attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs B6.6 Opinions not known REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 3

5 Part C - Financial information C Financial information on project C-1 Investment outlays [ ] 1,890,000 C-2 Operating costs and revenues due to project implementation [k ] Before project After project Total operating costs / Total operating revenues / C-3 Operating capital [k ] After project Demand for working capital C-4 Financing sources [ ] Total Disbursed Committed Planned % C4.1 Own sources C4.2 Grants (source: REReP 1.2 project C4.3 Soft Loans C4.4 Loans with subsidized interest C4.5 Private sector C4.6 Other (please specify) C4.7 Total C.5 Financing schedule [ ] Planned Sources Own Other Total Year Activity C.4.1 C42- C4.6 C Total 4 Preparation phase , , , ,00 Construction , , , ,00 Total , , , , ,00 REReP 1.2 project (idea) template 4