Navy Shore Energy Program

Transcription

1 Navy Shore Energy Program SAME Camp Pendleton Day Conference Captain Joe Campbell Facilities and Environmental Director June 23,

2 Shore Energy Strategy Navy Energy Culture Why? How? The Program Renewable Energy & Sustainability ENERGY SECURITY & COMPLIANCE Energy Efficiency How can you help? Not Addressed in this Briefing

3 Why? Navy Shore Energy Mandates Reduce Consumption Renewables Vehicles Sustainable Facilities LEGISLATION - EXECUTIVE ORDERS Electric- 3% per year or 30% by 2015 (EISA 07- E.O.13423) Water-2% per year or 16% by 2015 (E.O ) Purchase renewable electric: 3% now and 7.5% by FY13 (EPAct 05) At least 50% of renewables from new sources (E.O ) 25% or greater of electric energy use from renewables by 2025 Reduce annual petroleum consumption by 20% by 2015 (EISA 07) Lease spaces req d to have Energy Star label (E.O ) Energy and water audits on facilities on 4yr cycle (EISA 07) Buildings designed 30% better than ASHRAE standards 15% of building inventory to be sustainable by 2015 (LEED or similar) (E.O ) 100% of buildings designed after 2020 must be net-zero by 2030 SECNAV / NAVY GOALS 50% ashore by 2020 compared to 2003 baseline (Navy) 50% of energy consumed provided through alternative sources (SECNAV) 50% of installations net-zero by 2020 using alternatives (SECNAV) 50% by 2015 in commercial vehicle fleet (SECNAV) 50% DON installations will be net-zero by 2020 (SECNAV) 3

4

5 How? Reduce Consumption Virtual Installation Heat Map Potential KBTU Savings per Technology and Building Type eroi tool: process to develop and track energy initiatives Projects Submitted and Project Tracking Updated Annually Use installa;on audits and heat map of consump;on to target high consump;on facili;es Review building type for recommended technology ROI eroi tool: adaptable assessment tool used to standardize energy investment decisions and develop op;mized project list Installation Region Navy Energy Program aggregates project submissions for shore energy poraolio at Region and Navy- wide level 5

6 Energy Efficiency Audits Northwest Total KSF = 18,738 Audited KSF = 14,054 Added in 2010 = 5,300 KSF, $705,000 Midwest Total KSF = 17,756 Audited KSF = 12,435 13,317 KSF Under Contract = 0 Hawaii Total KSF = 15,663 Audited KSF = Southwest Total KSF = 51,908 Audited KSF = 38,931 Added in 2010 = 23,200 KSF, $2,680,000 Washington Total KSF = 33,596 Audited KSF = 25,197 Midlant Total SF = 83,633 Audited SF = 62,725 Southeast Total KSF = 73,453 Audited KSF = 71,409 Europe/Southwest Asia Total KSF = 18,641 Audited KSF = 13,981 Added in 2010 = 2,750 KSF, $470,000 FarEast Total KSF = 26,152 Audited KSF = 19,599 Added in 2010 = 1,700 KSF, $464,000 Marianas Total SF = 20,988 Audited SF = 15,741 Green Audits on track to meet EISA requirements 6

7 Advanced Meters Instrumentation Northwest (3 sites) Jul09, $33.0M 1,799 electric meters 323 gas meters 542 water meters 122 steam meters Midwest (3 sites) Sep10, $9.6M 467 electric meters 187 gas meters 169 water meters 64 steam meters Hawaii (3 sites), Dec10, $11.23M PMRF, Sep09, $1.0M 741 / 82 electric meters 0 gas meters 318 / 28 water meters 0 steam meters Southwest (10 sites), Aug09, $31.1M NBVC, Mar09, $5.5M 2,104 electric meters 520 gas meters 975 water meters 22 steam meters Washington (7 sites) Sep09, $12.7M 1,173 electric meters 6 gas meters 135 water meters 100 steam meters Midlant (15 sites), FY11 1,635 electric meters 179 gas meters 726 water meters 589 steam meters Southeast (15 sites), Sep09, $38.7M 2,461 electric meters 593 gas meters 1,185 water meters 34 steam meters EURAFSWA (4 sites), FY electric meters 43 gas meters 100 water meters 65 steam meters Marianas (3 sites), FY electric meters 0 gas meters 239 water meters 5 steam meters Far East (5 sites), FY12 1,880 electric meters 0 gas meters 28 water meters 126 steam meters Awarded Award Plan FY11 Award Plan FY12 FOUO: Due to Sensitivity of Contract Execution 7

8 Navy Shore Energy Implementation Plan Energy Reduc;on Renewable Vehicles Sustainable Facili;es Energy Ini;a;ves (Projects) Navy Shore Facility Management Systems CIRCUITS GIS infads Maximo Facility Control & Monitoring Systems Automated Meter Infrastructure Direct Digital Controls Variable Air Volume SCADA Enabling Technology Provides Actionable Information at the Building Level Measurement and Verifica;on Data PSNet 8

9 The Program Energy Funding 6/23/11 8:49 AM 9

10 Highest number of projects and highest percentage of funding is classified as Facility Energy Improvements (Category 10) Lighting Systems (Cat 6) had more projects but HVAC (Cat 4) had a higher percentage of funding. Energy Project Types Energy Category # Projects Total Cost Total Annual Energy Savings ECMS or HVAC Controls 1 17 $34,750, Steam and Condensate Systems 2 1 $1,369, Boiler Plant Modifications 3 4 $1,943, HVAC 4 23 $23,446, Weatherization 5 5 $2,308, Lighting Systems 6 33 $17,151, Energy Recovery Systems Electrical Energy Systems 8 4 $408, Renewable Energy Systems 9 4 $418, Facility Energy Improvements $133,237, Water Projects $7,921, /23/11 8:49 AM Released 02/23/2011 LCDR Keith Benson TFE Project Template Instructional v 3 AM.pptx

11 How can you help? Energy Audits Completely understand scope and deliver or beat the MBTU savings Develop Efficiencies of Scale / Repetition 11

12 Questions? 12

13 Net Present Value (NPV) NAVSTA Newport: Exceed 58% Reduction Facilities = 20% Operational = 3% FY03-09 = 35% CapEx = $54.1M

14 Benchmark Heat Map NAVSTA Newport: Exceed 58% Reduction Facilities = 20% Operational = 3% FY03-09 = 35% = Building size (sq ft) ASHRAE Building type regional benchmark Below Benchmark At Benchmark > 200% Benchmark

15 Methodology Five key strategic drivers combine to provide secure energy to the Navy Shore community Provide Secure Energy to Navy Shore Community Maximize Financial Benefits Minimize Shore Energy Consumption Provide Reliable Energy to Critical Infrastructure Achieve Regulatory Compliance and Stakeholder Expectations Develop Enabling Infrastructure Metric Financial Net Present Value (NPV) Utilities Scoring Scale MDI Outage Exposure Incremental Backup Scoring Scale Mandates Public Perception Quality of Service Scoring Scale Data Improvement Energy Flexibility Tech Adoption Measure Dollars MBTU Scaling Questions Scaling Questions Scaling Questions Weight 39% 9% 26% 13% 13% Individual inputs for a project are incorporated into each strategic driver and, then, scored, weighted, and aggregated into a single performance metric to provide the project s EROI

16 Energy Project Types # Projects ECMS or HVAC Controls 17 Steam and Condensate Systems 1 Boiler Plant Modifications 4 HVAC 23 Weatherization 5 Lighting Systems 33 Electrical Energy Systems 4 Renewable Energy Systems 4 Facility Energy Improvements* 46 Water Projects 10 *Includes Building Recommissioning and projects covering multiple categories. AQ Range Number of Projects Less than $25,000 8 Between $25,000 and $100, Between $100,000 and $250, Between $250,000 and $500, Between $500,000 and $1,000, Between $1,000,000 and $5,000, Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000 5 Greater than $10,000,000 4 Grand Total 147 6/23/11 8:49 AM 16

17 AQ Range by Region Number of Projects EURAFSWA 3 Between $100,000 and $250,000 1 Between $250,000 and $500,000 1 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 1 Hawaii 5 Between $25,000 and $100,000 1 Between $100,000 and $250,000 3 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 1 Japan 17 Between $25,000 and $100,000 4 Between $100,000 and $250,000 3 Between $250,000 and $500,000 4 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 3 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 3 Marianas 8 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 1 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 5 Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000 2 Mid-Atlantic 21 Less than $25,000 1 Between $100,000 and $250,000 3 Between $250,000 and $500,000 3 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 4 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 6 Greater than $10,000,000 4 AQ Range by Region Number of Projects Midwest 3 Between $25,000 and $100,000 1 Between $250,000 and $500,000 1 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 1 NDW 40 Less than $25,000 5 Between $25,000 and $100, Between $100,000 and $250,000 6 Between $250,000 and $500,000 3 Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 6 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 7 Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000 3 Northwest 1 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 1 Southeast 26 Between $25,000 and $100,000 7 Between $100,000 and $250,000 3 Between $250,000 and $500, Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 4 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 2 Southwest 23 Less than $25,000 2 Between $25,000 and $100, Between $100,000 and $250,000 6 Between $250,000 and $500,000 3 Between $1,000,000 and $5,000, /23/11 08:49 17