Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition #

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/04/23 Certification Date 2015/02/19 Current Property Use Commercial Intended Property Use Community Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Community property use Property Municipal Address 135 VANDERHOOF AVENUE, TORONTO, ON, M4G 2J3 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 1 of 20

2 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC Owner Name Authorized Person Mailing Address Postal Code ONTARIO LIMITED ANTOINETTE BENEDETTO 3655 KEELE STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M3J 1M8 Phone (416) Fax (416) Address Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 2 of 20

3 RSC Property Location Information Municipal Address(es) Municipality Legal Description Assessment Roll Number(s) Property Identifier Number(s) 135 VANDERHOOF AVENUE, TORONTO, ON M4G 2J3 Toronto See Attached Lawyer s Letter (LT) RSC Property Geographical References Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 17 Easting 632, Northing 4,841, RSC Property Use Information The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use. Current Property Use Intended Property Use Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section of the EPA Commercial Community No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 3 of 20

4 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 4 of 20

5 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information Name Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act LAD RAK Licence Licence Number QP Employer Name Mailing Address MCCLYMONT AND RAK ENGINEERS INC ZENWAY BOULEVARD, VAUGHAN ONTARIO, L4H 3H9 CANADA Phone (416) Fax (905) Address lrak@mccrak.com Municipal Information Local or Single-Tier Municipality Toronto Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office District Office District Office Address Toronto District Office 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 5 of 20

6 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P1 ESA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Northwest Corner of Vanderhoof Avenue & Reseach Road, Toronto, Ontario Mr. Lad Rak, P.Eng. MCCLYMONT & RAK ENGINEERS, INC. Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 6 of 20

7 Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P2 ESA Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program, Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Mr. Lad Rak, P.Eng. MCCLYMONT & RAK ENGINEERS, INC. Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 7 of 20

8 Environmental Condition Section 41 applies? Section 43.1 applies? No No Site Condition Information Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2015/02/19 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property Soil Texture Assessment/Restoration Approach Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04? Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC? Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Coarse Full Depth Generic Yes Yes Yes MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC Non-potable Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3 Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/04 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 8 of 20

9 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Benzene < µg/g 2 Ethylbenzene < µg/g 3 Toluene < µg/g 4 Xylene Mixture < µg/g 5 Acetone < µg/g 6 Bromomethane < µg/g 7 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/g 8 Chlorobenzene < µg/g 9 Chloroform < µg/g 10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/g 11 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/g 12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/g 13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/g 14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/g 15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/g 16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/g 17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/g 18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/g 19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/g 20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/g 21 Ethylene dibromide < µg/g 22 Hexane (n) < µg/g 23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < µg/g 24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/g 25 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/g 26 Methylene Chloride < µg/g 27 Styrene < µg/g 28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/g 29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/g 30 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/g 31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/g 32 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/g 33 Trichloroethylene < µg/g 34 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/g 35 Vinyl Chloride < µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 9 of 20

10 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* µg/g 37 Chromium VI < µg/g 38 Cyanide (CN-) µg/g 39 Electrical Conductivity ms/cm 40 Mercury µg/g 41 Sodium Adsorption Ratio Bromodichloromethane < µg/g 43 Bromoform < µg/g 44 Dibromochloromethane < µg/g 45 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < µg/g 46 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F µg/g 47 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F µg/g 48 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/g 49 Acenaphthene < µg/g 50 Acenaphthylene < µg/g 51 Anthracene < µg/g 52 Benz[a]anthracene µg/g 53 Benzo[a]pyrene µg/g 54 Benzo[b]fluoranthene µg/g 55 Benzo[ghi]perylene < µg/g 56 Benzo[k]fluoranthene µg/g 57 Chrysene µg/g 58 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < µg/g 59 Fluoranthene µg/g 60 Fluorene < µg/g 61 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < µg/g 62 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** µg/g 63 Naphthalene µg/g 64 Phenanthrene µg/g 65 Pyrene µg/g 66 Polychlorinated Biphenyls µg/g 67 Antimony µg/g 68 Arsenic 1 18 µg/g 69 Selenium < µg/g 70 Barium µg/g...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 10 of 20

11 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 71 Beryllium µg/g 72 Boron (total) µg/g 73 Cadmium µg/g 74 Chromium Total µg/g 75 Cobalt µg/g 76 Copper µg/g 77 Lead µg/g 78 Molybdenum < µg/g 79 Nickel µg/g 80 Silver < µg/g 81 Thallium µg/g 82 Uranium µg/g 83 Vanadium µg/g 84 Zinc µg/g 85 Chlorophenol, 2- < µg/g 86 Dichlorophenol, 2,4- < µg/g 87 Pentachlorophenol < µg/g 88 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- < µg/g 89 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- < µg/g 90 Biphenyl 1,1'- < µg/g 91 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether < µg/g 92 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether < µg/g 93 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate < 2 28 µg/g 94 Chloroaniline p- < µg/g 95 Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'- < 1 1 µg/g 96 Diethyl Phthalate < µg/g 97 Dimethylphenol, 2,4- < µg/g 98 Dimethylphthalate < µg/g 99 Dinitrophenol, 2,4- < 1 59 µg/g 10 Dinitrotoluene, 2,4 & 2,6- < µg/g 10 Phenol < µg/g 10 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- < µg/g Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 11 of 20

12 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 1 Dioxane, 1,4 < µg/l 2 Acetone µg/l 3 Bromomethane < µg/l 4 Carbon Tetrachloride < µg/l 5 Chlorobenzene < µg/l 6 Chloroform < µg/l 7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < µg/l 8 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < µg/l 9 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < µg/l 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane < µg/l 11 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < µg/l 12 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < µg/l 13 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < µg/l 14 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < µg/l 15 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < µg/l 16 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < µg/l 17 Dichloropropene,1,3- < µg/l 18 Ethylene dibromide < µg/l 19 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/l 20 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < µg/l 21 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < µg/l 22 Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) < µg/l 23 Methylene Chloride < µg/l 24 Styrene < µg/l 25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < µg/l 26 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < µg/l 27 Tetrachloroethylene < µg/l 28 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < µg/l 29 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < µg/l 30 Trichloroethylene < µg/l 31 Trichlorofluoromethane < µg/l 32 Vinyl Chloride µg/l 33 Chloride 16, µg/l 34 Chromium VI < µg/l 35 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/l...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 12 of 20

13 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 36 Mercury < µg/l 37 Bromodichloromethane < µg/l 38 Bromoform < µg/l 39 Dibromochloromethane < µg/l 40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < µg/l 41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < µg/l 42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < µg/l 43 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < µg/l 44 Polychlorinated Biphenyls < µg/l 45 Acenaphthene < µg/l 46 Acenaphthylene < µg/l 47 Anthracene < µg/l 48 Benz[a]anthracene < µg/l 49 Benzo[a]pyrene < µg/l 50 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < µg/l 51 Benzo[ghi]perylene < µg/l 52 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < µg/l 53 Chrysene < µg/l 54 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < µg/l 55 Fluoranthene < µg/l 56 Fluorene < µg/l 57 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < µg/l 58 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < µg/l 59 Naphthalene < µg/l 60 Phenanthrene < µg/l 61 Pyrene < µg/l 62 Sodium 26, µg/l 63 Antimony < µg/l 64 Arsenic µg/l 65 Selenium < 2 63 µg/l 66 Barium µg/l 67 Beryllium < µg/l 68 Boron (total) µg/l 69 Cadmium < µg/l 70 Chromium Total < µg/l...continued on next page Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 13 of 20

14 Table 1 Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued) Ground Water Continued from previous page... Contaminant Name Maximum Concentration Applicable Site Condition Standard Unit of Measure 71 Cobalt µg/l 72 Copper µg/l 73 Lead < µg/l 74 Molybdenum µg/l 75 Nickel µg/l 76 Silver < µg/l 77 Thallium < µg/l 78 Uranium µg/l 79 Vanadium µg/l 80 Zinc µg/l 81 Chlorophenol, 2- < µg/l 82 Dichlorophenol, 2,4- < µg/l 83 Pentachlorophenol < µg/l 84 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- < µg/l 85 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- < µg/l 86 Benzene < µg/l 87 Ethylbenzene < µg/l 88 Toluene µg/l 89 Xylene Mixture µg/l 90 Biphenyl 1,1'- < µg/l 91 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether < µg/l 92 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether < µg/l 93 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate µg/l 94 Chloroaniline p- < µg/l 95 Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'- < µg/l 96 Diethyl Phthalate µg/l 97 Dimethylphenol, 2,4- < µg/l 98 Dimethylphthalate < µg/l 99 Dinitrophenol, 2,4- < µg/l 10 Dinitrotoluene, 2,4 & 2,6- < µg/l 10 Phenol < µg/l 10 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- < µg/l Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 14 of 20

15 Remedial Action and Mitigation Remediated Soils Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process. Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) Description of Remediation Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property. Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 21.0 Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) Soil Brought to the Property Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A. Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property (in-ground volume in m³) 21.0 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 15 of 20

16 Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing. N/A Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date. N/A Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 16 of 20

17 Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. N/A Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. N/A Monitoring or Maintenance Soil Management Measures Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. N/A Ground Water Management Measures Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date. N/A Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation? Yes Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 17 of 20

18 Qualified Person s Statements and Certifications As the qualified person, I certify that: A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2015/02/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located. As of 2015/02/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2015/02/19, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer MCCLYMONT AND RAK ENGINEERS INC. does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2015/02/19. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, LAD RAK, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/04/10: a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition. I Agree Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 18 of 20

19 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired A Current plan of Survey Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model Owner or agent certification statements Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 19 of 20

20 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/04/23 20 of 20

21 Request ID: Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/04/10 Demande n : Province de l'ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 09:49:35 Transaction n : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie : CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE This is to certify that according to the records of the Ministry of Government Services D'après les dossiers du Ministère des Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons que la société O N T A R I O L I M I T E D Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) is a corporation incorporated, amalgamated or continued under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The corporation came into existence on est une société constituée, prorogée ou née d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la Province de l'ontario. La société a été fondée le D E C E M B E R 0 4 D É C E M B R E, and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute. Dated Fait le A P R I L 1 0 A V R I L, Director Directeur The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29 PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND PAGE 1 OF 1 REGISTRY PREPARED FOR SFazel01 OFFICE # (LT) ON 2014/12/22 AT 14:30:23 * CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT * SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PART OF BLOCK Y, PLAN 3001, EAST YORK, AND PART OF LOTS 1007 & 1008, PLAN 1925, EAST YORK, DESIGNATED AS PARTS 14 TO 19 (INCL.), REF. PLAN 66R CITY OF TORONTO., CITY OF TORONTO PROPERTY REMARKS: ESTATE/QUALIFIER: RECENTLY: PIN CREATION DATE: FEE SIMPLE DIVISION FROM /07/18 ABSOLUTE OWNERS NAMES CAPACITY SHARE ONTARIO LIMITED NC REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD ** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES AND DELETED INSTRUMENTS SINCE: 2002/07/18 ** CA /02/15 APL (GENERAL) ONTARIO LIMITED C REMARKS: APPLICATION FOR FIRST REGISTRATION D R /02/15 PLAN REFERENCE C 66R /10/15 PLAN REFERENCE C REMARKS: PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF BLOCK Y, PLAN 3001 AND PART OF LOTS 1007 & 1008, PLAN 1925, EAST YORK, CITY OF TORONTO. NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.

30

31 TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 APEC1 APEC2 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property The Entire Phase I Property Southern portion of Phase I Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 2 30 Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality N/A Generator (Metals, Alkaline Wastes/Paint/Pigment/Coating Residues, Inorganic and Organic Laboratory Chemicals, Petroleum Distillates, Halogenated Solvents, Wastes Oils & Lubricants) 59 Wood Treating and Preservative Facility and Bulk Storage of Treated and Preserved Wood Products 10 Commercial Autobody Shop 58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste, other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners 33 Metal Treatment, Coating, Plating and Finishing Location of PCA (on-site or off-site) Onsite Offsite approximately 10 m west of the Site Offsite approximately 40 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 40 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - PCBs - PHCs - VOCs - PAHs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - VOCs - PHCs - PAHs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - PAHs - PCBs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil

32 N/A motor vehicle, electric and electronic equipment manufacturing Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site 29 Glass Manufacturing Offsite approximately 100 m southwest of the Site 50 Soap and Detergent Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage 31 Ink Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage 28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Offsite approximately 130 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 140 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 140 m southwest of the Site - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - VOCs - VOCs - PHCs GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil Notes: 1 Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through: (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or as occurred in a Phase One Study Area. 3 When completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the Protocol of in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr(VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high ph PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low ph 4 When submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached. **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n est disponible qu en Anglais en vertu du réglement 671/92, qui en exampte l application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l aide en fracais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l Environement au

33 TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE I PROPERTY (Refer to clause 16(2), Schedule D, O. Reg.153/04) Year Name of Owner Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Part of PIN (LT) June 13, 1801 June 14, 1801 to June 13, 1803 June 14, 1803 to January 20, 1842 January 21, 1842 to September 13, 1842 September 14, 1842 to December 4, 1854 December 5, 1854 to December 15, 1895 December 16, 1895 to April 1, 1902 April 2, 1902 to April 10, 1912 April 11, 1912 to December 1, 1913 December 2, 1913 to April 21, 1931 April 22, 1931 to May 13, 1936 May 14, 1936 to August 15, 1941 August 16, 1941 to September 18, 1946 September 19, 1946 to December 5, 1989 December 7, 1989 to Present Crown James Clark George Forsyth James Cunningham George Cunningham Thomas Elgie Marie Elgie George Hunt Robert Wilson York Land Company Ltd. John Montgomery York Land Company Ltd. Minister of Reconstruction & Supply Corning Canada Inc Ontario Limited Description of Property Use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use Presumed agricultural land use An industrial building occupied the Site. The industrial building was demolished in the mid 1990 s. Site was converted to asphalt paved commercial parking. Property Use 1 Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Industrial Land Use Commercial Land Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. A Fire Insurance Plan of 1923 showed the property being vacant. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No listing by City Directories. A Fire Insurance Plan of 1939 showed the property being vacant. No records or historical documents were available for Phase I Property. No listing by City Directories. Ownership confirmed by the City Directories of 1955 to 1985 and aerial photographs of 1950 to 1987 showing industrial building onsite. Parking lot visible on aerial photographs of 1992 and 2005.

34 1 for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O. Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agricultural or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 when submitting a record of site condition for filling, a copy of this table must be attached. ** Cette publication hautement spécialisée n est pas disponible qu an anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92 qui en exampte l application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l Environment au

35 6.11 PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The following section describes the Phase II Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for the property located at part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario (hereafter referred to as the Site ). As outlined in Section 43 of O.Reg.153/04, this CSM establishes the current condition of Phase II property, or where remedial actions have been undertaken, the condition of the Site prior to remediation. The Site represents the Phase I, Phase II, and RSC property for all discussion hereafter. Sections through describe the pre-remediation condition of the Phase II ESA property. Section describes the subsequent remediation program and post-remedial confirmation sampling that took place Phase I ESA Information Site Description The Site is located on northwest corner of Vanderhoof Avenue and Research Road approximately 500 m southeast of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and Brentcliffe Road. The Site is in a mixed-use residential, parkland, commercial, and industrial area of the City of Toronto (Figure 1). The municipal address associated with the Site is part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario. The legal description of the Site is: Part of Block Y, Plan 3001, East York and Part of Lots 1007 & 1008, Plan 1925, East York, designated as Parts 14, 15, 17 & 18, Plan 66R The Property Identification Number (PIN) associated with the Site is part of PIN (LT). The Site represents a strip of land which is to be conveyed to the City of Toronto for road widening purposes along Vanderhoof Avenue, being a part of the larger property of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue (Figure 2). The Site represents a portion of land which currently exists as an asphalt and gravel parking lot on the southern portion and vacant land along the north directly adjacent to Vanderhoof Avenue. The Site is approximately 7.6 m wide along the western and central sections, and irregular in shape on the eastern section, with a total area of approximately 1,885 m 2 ( ha). At the time of the Phase II investigation, the Site was vacant, and covered with grass, except for the southern section, which was covered by asphalt and used as Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 24

36 a commercial parking area Potentially Contaminating Activities The Phase I Conceptual Site Model (CSM) contains a distribution of potential environmental risk factors associated with areas of potential environmental concern (APEC), potentially contaminating activities (PCA) and groups of contaminants of potential concerns (COC). This geographical distribution is described in relation to the Site in terms of its location. PCAs have been identified in the Phase I ESA based on their proximity to the Phase I property, surface drainage, and groundwater flow direction. The PCAs occurred both on the Phase I property and within the Phase I study area (250 m radius surrounding the Site) and relate to APECs located on the Phase I property. The Phase I CSM is provided in Figure 3. PCAs in the Phase I study area and the corresponding APECs are described in the Table below. TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Area of Potential Environmental Concern APEC1 APEC2 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property The Entire Phase I Property Southern portion of Phase I Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 30 Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality Other Generator (Metals, Alkaline Wastes/Paint/Pigm ent/coating Residues, Inorganic and Organic Laboratory Chemicals, Petroleum Distillates, Halogenated Solvents, Wastes Oils & Lubricants) Location of PCA (on-site or off-site) Onsite Offsite approximately 10 m west of the Site Contaminants of Potential Concern - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - PCBs - PHCs - VOCs - PAHs Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or sediment) GW, Soil GW, Soil Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 25

37 59 Wood Treating and Preservative Facility and Bulk Storage of Treated and Preserved Wood Products Offsite approximately 40 m southwest of the Site - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs GW, Soil 10 Commercial Autobody Shop 58 Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste, other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners 33 Metal Treatment, Coating, Plating and Finishing Other motor vehicle, electric and electronic equipment manufacturing 29 Glass Manufacturing 50 Soap and Detergent Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage 31 Ink Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage 28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Offsite approximately 40 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 90 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 100 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 130 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 140 m southwest of the Site Offsite approximately 140 m southwest of the Site - Metals - VOCs - PHCs - PAHs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - PAHs - PCBs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - PHCs - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - Metals - VOCs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - ABNs - PAHs - CPs - VOCs - VOCs - PHCs GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil GW, Soil Areas of Potential Environmental Concern The Phase I CSM identified APECs located onsite in relation to PCAs located Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 26

38 onsite. The identified APECs are described below. APEC1: The Entire Phase I Property. The entire property is considered an APEC based on the potential for importation of fill material of unknown quality. The groups of contaminants of potential concerns (COC) associated with PCA1 are: VOCs, PHC, ABNs, PAHs, CPs, PCBs, and metals in the soil and/or groundwater. APEC1 was investigated by boreholes advanced across the Site. BH1 BH3 assessed the soil and groundwater concentrations of one or more of the COCs identified above. APEC 2: The southern portion of the Phase I Property. The southern portion of the Site is considered an APEC due to commercial/industrial uses located southwest of the Site. VOCs, PHCs, PAHs, ABNs, CPs, PCBs, and metals in the soil and/or groundwater are the COCs for this portion of the Site. APEC2 was investigated by a borehole advanced in the southern section of the Site. BH1 assessed soil and groundwater concentrations of one or more of the COC groups described in the APEC table above Physical Setting The Site is located in the City of Toronto, and is situated in a mixed use residential, parkland, and commercial/industrial area. The nearest surface water body is a tributary of the West Don River, approximately 150 m to the northeast of the Site (Figure 2). The Site is bounded by the following properties/features: North Vanderhoof Avenue South Research Road and vacant land East West Vanderhoof Avenue & Leslie Street Commercial parking lot and vacant land (proposed roadway) Geology The locations of the geological cross-sections are shown in Figure 4. Crosssections A-A and B-B are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. Ground surface elevations across the Site vary from masl to masl. Based on the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 27

39 investigations, the geologic formations beneath the Site include the following (from surface to depth): Asphalt: 50 mm thick asphalt is present at the surface of BH1. Fill: Surficial fill is present at BH2 and BH3 and below the asphalt in BH1 containing sand and silty sand. The fill varies in thickness from 0.4 m to 3.0 mbgs. Native Soil: Typically silty sand, clayey silt till, silty clay till, silty clay, sandy silt to sand to maximum depth explored Hydrogeology During the measurement of water table elevations the presence of free-product was not encountered and there was no presence of Light-Non-Aqueous-Phase- Liquids (LNAPLs) or Dense-Non-Aqueous-Phase-Liquids (DNAPLs). The interpreted groundwater flow direction is based on the January 19, 2015 round of water table elevation measurements since this event was able to obtain static water table elevations from all monitoring wells onsite (BH1 BH3). Confidence in the groundwater flow direction could be increased with additional rounds of water table elevation measurements. Water table elevation measurements were collected at all accessible monitoring wells across the study area on January 19, 2015, at BH1, BH2, and BH3 with following levels: mbgs (93.54 masl), mbgs (93.25 masl), and mbgs (93.58 masl). Therefore, the interpreted groundwater flow direction is inferred to the northeast towards the West Don River. The depth of the buried underground utilities (e.g. sewers and water piping) beneath and adjacent to the Site have not been assessed. The water table elevation on the Site indicates that the probability of groundwater intercepting any shallow underground utilities is low. However, without full investigation, the possibility of preferential flow paths does exist onsite. MONITORING WELL ID GROUND ELEVATION WATER LEVEL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATE OF MEASUREMENT DEPTH OF WELL LENGTH OF SCREEN INSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE (masl) (mbgs) (masl) (dd/mmyyyy) (mbgs) (m) (mm) TOP OF MONITORING WELL BH /01/ FLUSH MOUNT Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 28

40 BH /01/ STAND PIPE BH /01/ STAND PIPE NOTE: mbgs - metres below ground surface masl - metres above sea level Hydraulic Gradient Based on groundwater table elevations the average horizontal hydraulic gradient across the Site is m/m. The hydraulic gradient was calculated from groundwater elevations recorded during the January 2015 monitoring event between wells BH1, BH2, and BH3. The minimum hydraulic gradient was observed between monitoring wells BH1 and BH3 at m/m while the maximum hydraulic gradient was observed between monitoring wells BH2 and BH3 at m/m. Nested monitoring wells were not installed during this investigation and therefore the vertical hydraulic gradient was not calculated Temporal Variability in Groundwater Flow Direction Temporal variability in the groundwater flow direction was not assessed in this investigation. The interpreted flow direction from January 2015 monitoring event indicates that groundwater flows to the northeast. Confidence in the seasonal variation of the groundwater flow direction could be increased with multiple rounds of water table elevation measurements in different seasons within the same monitoring wells Free Product Thickness No free product was observed during this investigation and, therefore, no free product thickness measurements were collected Soil Imported to the Phase II Property No soil was imported to the Site during the Phase II investigation; however, it is assumed that soil material was potentially imported to the Site at some point during the Site s history Approximate Depth to Bedrock Bedrock was not encountered during this investigation. The maximum depth of the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 29

41 sub-surface investigation was mbgs (90.56 masl BH1). However, bedrock in this area of Toronto is inferred to be at an approximate depth of 47 mbgs (80 masl), as determined from previous investigations by MCR in the vicinity Degree and Extent of Contamination The following section describes the soil contamination present at the Site at concentrations that exceed the applicable MOE Table 3 community standards Applicable Standards The following issues were considered in selecting the assessment criteria: It is located within the City of Toronto which obtains its municipal water supply from Lake Ontario. Therefore, the Site is located in a non-potable groundwater region as defined in Sections 35 to 37 of O.Reg.153/04. It is not classified as a sensitive site because it does not meet any of the definitions of a sensitive site as listed in Section 41 of O.Reg.153/04 and described below: o It is not located within or adjacent to an area of natural significance. o The soil ph is within the neutral range. o It is not a shallow soil property because it has more than 2 m of soil above the bedrock. o It is not located within 30 m of a water body. It contains coarse-textured soil as defined in Section 42 of O.Reg.153/04. The proposed use for the Site is community for road widening purposes, which is the most sensitive of adjacent uses. Therefore, the applicable Site Condition Standards (SCS) used to assess the analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples from the Site are the MOE Table 3 standards, community land use in a non-potable groundwater condition for coarse-textured soil as prescribed in the MOE s document, Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, dated April 15, Soil Quality The soil analytical results indicate that the soil quality beneath the Site satisfies the MOE Table 3 community standards for all compounds, except for select PAH parameters. The results of soil analysis and Table 3 community exceedances are Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 30

42 described below. VOC Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for VOCs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. PHC Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for PHCs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. PAH Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for PAHs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed, with the exception of those listed in the following table. The location and depth of these exceedances are presented in Figures 7 9. Soil Analytical Results PAH Parameters Exceeding Table 3 Community Standards PARAMETER 2011 MOE TABLE 3 C/C/I MCR BOREHOLES 2015 BH1-SS1 BH1-SS3 BH2-SS1 BH2-SS3 BH3-SS1 BH3-SS1 DUP BH3-SS m m 1.52 m m 0.00 m m 1.52 m m 0.00 m m 0.00 m m 4.57 m m (µg/g) 5-Jan-15 5-Jan-15 9-Jan-15 9-Jan-15 7-Jan-15 7-Jan-15 7-Jan-15 PAH Benzo(a)pyrene < < <0.05 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.1 <0.2 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 Note: BOLD BOLD = Exceeds 2011 MOE Table 3 Community Standards for Coarse-textured Soil = Analyte Not Detected But Reporting Detection Limit Exceeds 2011 MOE Table 3 Community Standards for Coarsetextured Soil ABN Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for ABNs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. CP Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for CPs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 31

43 PCB Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for PCBs, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. Metals Impacts in Soil A total of seven soil samples were tested for metals and inorganics, all of which satisfy the MOE Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed Groundwater Quality The analytical results indicate that groundwater beneath the Site satisfies the MOE Table 3 Standards for all parameters analyzed Preferential Pathways and Migration The possibility of preferential flow paths has not been fully assessed. However, this aspect is not considered critical to the overall assessment of the Site because the results of the groundwater quality satisfies the MOE Table 3 criteria. The depth of the buried underground utilities (e.g. sewers and water piping, electrical and natural gas) adjacent to the Site has not been fully assessed. The surrounding properties of Vanderhoof Avenue and Research Road have underground utilities. The deep water table elevation on the Site indicates that the probability of groundwater intercepting any shallow underground utilities is low. However, without full investigation, the possibility of preferential flow paths does exist onsite. Since the groundwater on the Site meets criteria, no migration of contaminants is expected to occur away from the property Subsurface Structures and Utilities The depth of utilities beneath and adjacent to the Site has not been assessed during this investigation. The deep water table elevation on the Site indicates that the probability of groundwater intercepting any shallow underground utilities is low Proposed Buildings No buildings are proposed for the Site; however, the Site will be conveyed to the City of Toronto for road widening purposes. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 32

44 Contamination In, On, or Under the Phase II Property The following section describes the soil contamination that was recorded at the Phase II property Areas Where Contaminants are Present The analytical results of soil and groundwater samples collected for the Phase II ESA were compared to the generic clean-up standards developed by the MOE under O.Reg.153/04, effective July 1, Criteria for the Table 3 Standards (community land use and coarse-grained soils) were used because the Site is located in an area with non-potable groundwater. Soil contamination present at the Site is summarized below. The horizontal distribution of soil contaminants is illustrated in Figure 7. The vertical distribution of soil contaminants is illustrated in Figures 8 and Contaminants Associated with Each Area Each area of the Site where contaminants of concern were identified is presented in the table below and illustrated horizontally in Figure 7. Site Area Northwest Central Southern N/A N/A PAHs Phase II Property Contaminants Medium Associated with Contaminants Soil exceedances recorded at the Site were only recorded in the fill of BH1, which was mainly comprised of sand Information Known about Each Contaminated Area The soil exceedances recorded at the Site were within the fill across the southern portion of the Site. This area of the Site is part of the parking lot for 135 Vanderhoof Avenue. The former use of the Site prior to the parking lot was part of the Corning Canada property, and the former industrial nature of the Site is the likely source of the contaminants identified. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 33

45 Distribution of Contaminants The contaminants of concern recorded in the soil were found within the fill material from the surface to a depth of 0.61 mbgs. PAH impacts were found within the fill located in the southern portion of the Site Reason for Discharge of Contaminants The potential presence of fill material of unknown quality and the former industrial uses occurring onsite likely contributed to the soil PAH impacts recorded during this investigation Migration of Contaminants The migration of soil impacts is not expected to occur significantly beyond the surficial depths. Soil samples collected from deeper elevations (below the depth of 0.61 mbgs) were analyzed for the same parameters exceeding the applicable standards in the fill material and did not record any exceedances to the applicable standards, indicating that the potential for vertical migration of contaminants to deeper native soil depths was limited. Since the groundwater quality onsite meets the MOE Table 3 criteria, migration of contaminants is not expected to occur away from the Site Climatic or Meteorological Conditions Influencing Migration It is not expected that climatic or meteorological conditions influenced the distribution or migration of contaminants. Temporal fluctuations in groundwater levels were not assessed during this investigation Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings Soil vapour monitoring has not been conducted as part of this investigation. However, soil vapour intrusion is not of potential concern for the following: The Site is currently vacant, All contaminated soil material has been removed during the remediation, The verification soil results indicated that all measured contaminant concentrations in the excavation were in compliance with the applicable MOE Table 3 community standards, and The proposed use for the Site is road widening. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 34

46 Potential Exposure Pathways and Receptors The Human Health Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is shown in Figures 15 and 16, and the Ecological CSM is shown in Figures 17 and 18. The human and ecological receptors and pathways are described on these figures and summarized below Human Health Receptors and Pathways The following onsite and offsite human receptors could be exposed to the contamination beneath the Site: Resident children Resident adult Indoor workers Outdoor workers Subsurface workers The following contaminant migration pathways have the potential to move contaminants from the primary source to the receptor groups: Ingestion of soil Dermal contact with soil Inhalation of airborne particles Inhalation of volatile substances Inhalation in a trench Many additional contaminant migration pathways were initially considered but were not deemed relevant for the Site Ecological Receptors and Pathways The following ecological receptors could be exposed to the contamination beneath the Site: Plants Terrestrial invertebrates Insectivorous mammals and birds Herbivorous mammals and birds Carnivorous mammals and birds The following contaminant migration pathways have the potential to transport contaminants from the primary source to the receptor groups: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 35

47 Ingestion of soil contaminants Immersion in soil contaminants Ingestion of plants Ingestion of invertebrates Ingestion of animal prey Remediation Program Sections 39 and 40 of Schedule E of O.Reg.153/04 require that remediation program include confirmation sampling and analyses to demonstrate that the Phase II property satisfies the applicable SCS. Results of the Phase II ESA found the presence of impacted fill material in a localized area, which exceeded the MOE Table 3 community standards for coarsegrained soils. The objective of the remediation program was to restore the Site to standards for community land use Soil Remediation Methodology The excavation program was conducted by Michael Bros. Excavating and Grading on February 18, The excavation was approximately 3.5 m x 3.5 m x 1.7 m deep. The impacted soils were sent to a licensed facility. MCR monitored the soil quality as it was excavated, including visual and olfactory observations. The impacted soils identified during the Phase II investigation were observed to be within the upper 0.61 m adjacent to BH1. Approximately 21 m 3 of soil was removed the Site as part of the remediation program. Following excavation, four soil compliance samples (VSA1 VSA4) plus one duplicate (VSA4 DUP) were collected from the remaining native soils and remaining fill. The depth of compliance samples collected were as follows: 1.7 mbgs 1.7 mbgs 1.0 mbgs 0.3 mbgs VSA4 0.3 mbgs Soil samples were sent to Maxxam Analytics Inc. for chemical analysis of PAH, Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 36

48 ABN, CP, metals and inorganics. The sampling locations are shown on Figure 7 and cross section profiles are shown on Figures 8 and 9. The samples were placed in clean glass jars or glass jars with Teflon lined lids, supplied by the laboratory, and stored in a cooler. Upon receipt of all analytical results confirming the remaining soil met the applicable criteria, this area was backfilled with imported Granular B material confirmed to meet the MOE Table 3 community standards. The source of backfill material was provided by Michael Bros. from Strata Aggregates yard at 10 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario (the export site). Reportedly, the granular material was set aside for Aspen Ridge Homes. Prior to backfill, and on February 19, 2015, MCR visited the export site to collect two samples of backfill material (GS1 and GS1 DUP) from the segregated stockpile of Granular B material. The samples of backfill were submitted to Maxxam Analytics for chemical analysis of the parameters listed in the table below. As per O.Reg.153/04, as amended, approximately 21 m 3 of soil was to be imported to the Site, requiring at least one sample plus one duplicate. Certificates of analysis from VSA and backfill sampling are included in Appendix E. REMEDIATION PROGRAM SAMPLED SOIL PARAMETERS Sample ID Matrix Chemical Analyses SOIL SAMPLES GS1 Granular Metals and Inorganics, PAH, ABN, CP, VOC, PHC, PCB GS1 DUP Granular Metals and Inorganics, PAH, ABN, CP, VOC, PHC, PCB Field Blank N/A F1, VOC VSA1 Native Sand Metals and Inorganics, PAH/ABN/CP VSA2 Native Sand Metals and Inorganics, PAH/ABN/CP VSA3 Native Sand Metals and Inorganics, PAH/ABN/CP VSA4 Fill Metals and Inorganics, PAH/ABN/CP VSA4 DUP Fill Metals and Inorganics, PAH/ABN/CP Based on the above information, the amount of verification soil samples collected Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 37

49 and tested during this remediation program is sufficient with respect to the size of the excavation as per O.Reg.153/04, as amended. Following the results of compliance testing, the backfill was completed on February 26, According to Aspen Ridge Homes, compaction of the backfill Granular B material was completed Post-remediation Soil Quality The analytical results from both the soil verification and backfill samples collected met the Table 3 community standards for all parameters analyzed. Therefore, all impacted fill material was removed from the Site, and the remaining soil meets the Table 3 community standards Post-remediation Groundwater Quality The groundwater quality onsite from the Phase II investigation met the MOE Table 3 standards for all parameters analyzed prior to any remedial activities and, therefore, there was no requirement for post-remedial groundwater monitoring Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results The following are Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures conducted for both the VSA and backfill sampling: Soil samples were collected in laboratory supplied glass jars and vials and handled with dedicated nitrile gloves. The samples were put on ice in coolers following collection and kept under 10 o C until they were submitted to the laboratory. The samples were submitted under chain of custody forms and laboratory protocols. All reusable sampling equipment was decontaminated between each use. Laboratory analysis was performed by accredited organizations. Furthermore, the QA/QC program included the testing of a field blank for analysis of VOC and PHC F1 in soil. The results of the QA/QC testing indicate that the blank sample contained no PHC or VOC parameters. The following quality control measures were used: Duplicate Soil: Paired analyses of a separate portion of the same sample used to evaluate the variance in the measurement (one duplicate set). Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 38

50 Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added usually to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added usually used to evaluate analyte recovery. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added usually used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure usually used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labelled compound whose behaviour mirrors the analytes of interest usually used to evaluate extraction efficiency. Certificates of analysis have been received for each sample submitted for analyses. Both the field and laboratory QA/QC results for this remediation work are considered acceptable based upon the following: Concentrations of analysed parameters in the field blank sample and the laboratory method blank samples were lower than the corresponding detection limits reported by the laboratory. Furthermore, a satisfactory correlation was found for the reported recoveries of laboratory surrogates. A review of the laboratory s certificate of analyses indicated that the hydrocarbon profiles had returned to baseline, prior to the C50 retention time. An acceptable correlation was observed between analytical results for laboratory replicates and their corresponding sampling pairs. Furthermore, a satisfactory correlation was found for the reported recoveries of laboratory surrogates. Based on the above, the laboratory QA/QC results for these work programs are considered acceptable. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment & Remediation Program Part of 135 Vanderhoof Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Page 39

51 CONC. WALK O/H WIRE Sectional Curbing Asphalt Isle Metal Post & Chain Fence 2 STOREY BRICK (STUCCO FACE) BUILDING `Robert Lowrey's Piano Exports' Hydro Box on Concrete Pads O/H Wires Sectional Curbing on Isle Concrete Pad 1 STOREY STUCCO FACE BUILDING PAVEMENT EDGE Concrete Walk Wood Guardrail Centerline of Angled Centerline of Angled Concrete Steps & Landing Sectional Curbing 2 STOREY BRICK BUILDING `Laurentide' `Winners' `Business Depot' `The Fabric Solution Inc.' 1 STOREY STUCCO FACE BUILDING Sectional Curbing Sectional Curbing 1 STOREY CONCRETE BLOCK Conc. Curb 1 STY BRICK BUILDING Interlocking Brick Conc. Walk Planter Canopy 1 Storey Glass `Saab' 1 STOREY STUCCO FACE HIGH 1 STOREY STUCCO FACE BUILDING Planter Conc. Curb 1 STOREY BRICK BUILDING TOP OF SLOPE Vacant - Formerly `Loomis & Tooles' REMAINS OF BUILDING (CONCRETE FOUNDATION) O/H Wires Stone Planter MLS on Conc. Pad LAWN LAWN Metal Railing CB CB CB CB RAILWAY TRACKS Cluster of Coniferous Trees CONCRETE CURB DEDICATED AS PUBLIC HIGHWAY BY BY-LAW 802 OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO INSTRUMENT No. LEASIDE (Schedule A, Parcel No. 1) Concrete Curb PART OF PORTION "C" INST. No Traffic Island Traffic Island Concrete Curb CONC. WALL PAVEMENT EDGE SOUTH LIMIT OF EGLINTON AVENUE BY REGISTERED PLAN 1925 PAVEMENT EDGE CPR CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT SECTIONAL CURBING METAL RAIL FENCE EDGE METAL RAIL FENCE PAVEMENT EDGE METER Guard Rail Gas Meters Chain Link Wire Concrete Retaining Wall Sectional Curbing Guard Rail SECTIONAL CURBING SECTIONAL CURBING SECTIONAL CURBING Sectional Curbing Chain Link Wire O/H Wire Concrete Curb Concrete Curb ASPHALT LANE KEYPLAN Not to Scale CONCRETE CURB LEGEND: TRUE NORTH PHASE I, PHASE II & RSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY PART OF 135 VANDERHOOF AVENUE, TORONTO, ONTARIO AREA MAP SCALE (m) E4660 FEBRUARY

52 TRIBUTARY OF WEST DON RIVER TRCA PROPERTY RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT 135 VANDERHOOF AVENUE (ASPHALT & GRAVEL PARKING LOT) COMMERCIAL USE PARKLAND <-- COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL USE --> LEGEND: TRUE NORTH PHASE I, PHASE II & RSC PROPERTY BOUNDARY PHASE I STUDY AREA (250 m) PART OF 135 VANDERHOOF AVENUE, TORONTO, ONTARIO SCALE (m) PHASE I STUDY AREA E4660 FEBRUARY