Vital Earth Composting Facility Environmental Statement: Non Technical Summary

Transcription

1 Vital Earth Environmental Statement: Non Technical Summary Final December 2011 Prepared for Vital Earth

2 Revision Schedule Environmental Statement: Non Technical Summary December 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 December 2011 Final Harriet Peacock Senior Assistant Environmental Specialist Kirsty Cobb Associate Jim MacQueen Principal Consultant URS Scott Wilson WestOne Wellington Street Leeds LS1 1BA Tel Fax

3 Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd ( URS Scott Wilson ) has prepared this Report for the use of Vital Earth ( Client ) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between May 2011 and December 2011 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS Scott Wilson disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS Scott Wilson s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS Scott Wilson specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright This Report is the copyright of URS Scott Wilson Ltd.

4 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 The EIA Process The Proposed Scheme... 2 Need for the Scheme... 2 Description of the Site... 3 Current Site Operations... 3 The Proposed Scheme... 4 Proposed Scheme Operation... 4 Proposed Scheme Construction... 5 Consideration of Alternatives Planning Policy Water Quality and Drainage... 6 Construction... 7 Operation Transport... 7 Construction... 7 Operation Noise... 8 Construction... 8 Operation Air Quality, Dust, Odour and Bioaerosol... 9 Construction... 9 Operation Cumulative and Combined Effects... 9 Cumulative Effects Combined Effects Summary of Environmental Effects Construction Operation References Figure 1 - Location Plan

5 1 Introduction 1.1 Vital Earth was granted planning permission in 2005 to construct and run a composting facility in Ashbourne. The site takes UK organic green garden waste and recycles it into compost. The composting operation currently has a permitted capacity of 60,000 tonnes of biodegradable waste per annum. Figure 1 shows the location and layout of the site. 1.2 The facility has already unintentionally increased its operations to 83,000 tonnes recently and Vital Earth is now seeking to increase the amount of biodegradable waste it is permitted to receive, from 60,000 tonnes to 85,000 tonnes per year. 1.3 Planning consent is now being sought to obtain formal permission for this increase and as part of this application process, Vital Earth is required to provide Derbyshire County Council with an Environmental Statement (ES) setting out the environmental effects of the proposed scheme. URS Scott Wilson has undertaken an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on behalf of Vital Earth for the proposed scheme. The findings of the EIA are reported in detail in the main ES. 1.4 Vital Earth already has planning permission to construct the proposed scheme; but the ES assesses both the construction and operation of the proposed scheme for completeness. 1.5 The ES will help Derbyshire County Council in deciding whether to allow the permitted increase to go ahead, based on a full understanding of any beneficial (positive) or adverse (negative) effects it might have on the environment. 1.6 This document provides a non-technical summary of the ES, as required by legislation. Its purpose is to provide an overview of the main findings of the ES in an easily understood format. It describes the proposed scheme, how the construction and operation are expected to affect the environment, and how any significant adverse effects on the environment will be mitigated. The EIA Process 1.7 EIA is required for the proposed scheme by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental lmpact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations Derbyshire County Council considers there to be the potential for significant environmental effects as a result of the proposed scheme and therefore an EIA is required. 1.8 The EIA process identifies any significant environmental effects (beneficial and adverse) of a proposed scheme, by considering the existing environmental characteristics and how they would be changed by the scheme. The EIA has been carried out following standard, best practice methods, to identify potential significant environmental effects. EIA Scoping 1.9 EIA scoping aims to identify relevant environmental issues to be included in the EIA and reported in the ES A scoping letter was produced, and comments were received from Derbyshire County Council and other relevant stakeholders, to agree the environmental issues to be considered, and other details of the assessment. NTS-1

6 1.11 A scoping opinion was received from Derbyshire County Council in September 2010, confirming the scope of the EIA. It was agreed that the following environmental topics would be assessed: Planning Policy; Water Quality and Drainage; Transport; Noise; and Air Quality, Dust, Odour and Bioaerosol A separate Flood Risk and Drainage Statement and a Transport Assessment (TA) have also been undertaken and relevant conclusions are summarised within Chapter 4 (Water Quality and Drainage) and Chapter 5 (Transport) of the ES. EIA Methodology and Reporting 1.13 Once the scope of the assessment had been agreed, additional technical information was collected to enable the likely impacts and effects of the proposed scheme to be predicted and considered, and the ES was prepared to explain the assessment process and its conclusions The main ES (Volumes 1-3) provides details of the methods used for the collection of data and for the prediction and assessment of impacts and evaluation of effects Effects are described as major, moderate or minor, adverse (negative) or beneficial (positive), or neutral, based on consideration of the scale of the impact (i.e. the change) and the sensitivity of the affected environmental feature (e.g. a listed building) Mitigation measures (measures to reduce adverse effects) are identified where necessary. Major and moderate effects are considered to be significant and are therefore material considerations in the decision-making process The EIA considers impacts from two stages of the proposed scheme construction (2011) and operation (in 2027, a future year chosen to allow the EIA to consider the effects of the scheme when landscape planting has grown and taken full effect). Effects are compared against the baseline scenario the situation without the proposed scheme. 2 The Proposed Scheme Need for the Scheme 2.1 The current waste source at the Vital Earth composting facility is domestic green and household waste from the kerbside collections from Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, East Staffordshire Borough Council, Derbyshire Dales District Council, South Derbyshire District Council and Derby City Council. An additional waste contract is being sought with Stoke-on-Trent City Council. This contract will divert approximately 25,000 tonnes of green and household waste per annum from landfill to Vital Earth s Ashbourne site where it will be recycled to form compost. At present, there is no closer composting facility to Stoke-on-Trent. 2.2 Also, due to the increased awareness of recycling and its environmental benefits of the general public has led to increased quantities of recyclable waste being collected. There is therefore an increasing amount of recyclable waste that the Councils need to process. NTS-2

7 2.3 Due to the additional contract with Stoke-on-Trent City Council and increases in collected recyclable waste, Vital Earth has accepted contracts that resulted in them unintentionally exceeding their permitted 60,000 tonnes per annum threshold. The site is currently operating at 83,000 tonnes per annum. Description of the Site 2.4 The site is currently owned and operated by the Vital Earth Group. Vital Earth was established in 1999 to process biodegradable waste into a highly fertile organic product. 2.5 The site is located off Blenheim Road on the Ashbourne Airfield Industrial Estate, which is to the south-east of Ashbourne town in Derbyshire. The existing site currently occupies an area of approximately 2.85 hectares (ha). 2.6 The Airfield Industrial Estate bounds the site to the north-west which includes an animal feed factory and a chicken factory. The remaining disused airfield, currently used for agriculture use, bounds the site to the north and east. The site is bound by Blenheim Road to the south and west. 2.7 The site is accessed from Blenheim Road on the Ashbourne Airfield Industrial Estate. The main access point into the industrial estate is from Derby Road. 2.8 There are 11 permanent staff at the composting facility that work 7am to 7pm Monday to Friday and from 7am to 1pm on Saturdays. There are no shift patterns for the staff at the site. 2.9 The site currently has permission for the utilisation of 60 composting vessels. However, the site is actually operating with 91 composting vessels. These 31 additional composting vessels are required to accommodate operation at the unpermitted 83,000 tonnes per annum. Current Site Operations 2.10 The current waste source at the site is domestic green and household waste from kerbside collections, which divert waste from landfill The waste is brought to the composting facility, and screened to remove any glass, plastic or metal. Water is added and the waste is enclosed in carefully controlled composting vessels for between five to seven days. Vital Earth ensures that the waste reaches a minimum temperature of 60ºC The compost is then unloaded from the composting vessels and heaped in the maturation shed. The compost is aerated for a further four six weeks for the compost to mature and cool The mature compost is screened into various sizes and blended with organic material such as wood bark and top soil The finished product is exported from the site. The bagged compost goes to garden centres throughout the UK. The bulk loose material goes to other retail producers and to landscaping companies, green roof companies and amenity companies for use on golf courses and football pitches There are no retail sales of the product at the site nor are individual members of the public able to bring their own waste to the facility. NTS-3

8 The Proposed Scheme 2.16 Vital Earth has made a number of changes in order to improve site efficiency and productivity. As a result of this, Vital Earth now has the capacity for an additional 25,000 tonnes of waste per annum to be processed at the site Since 2007, compost was stored on areas to the north and south-east of the Vital Earth site. However, these areas did not have planning permission and therefore can no longer be used to store compost. Instead 2.17 ha of agricultural land to the south of the Vital Earth site is now being leased for a compost dispatch storage area. This agricultural land lies entirely within the settlement framework boundary of Ashbourne, allocated for employment purposes The leased land is an L shaped area situated within the defined boundary of the existing industrial estate. In total the composting facility will therefore occupy an area of approximately 5.02 ha The Council granted planning permission for the use of the leased land as a compost dispatch storage area in June The permission granted the stripping of topsoil from the leased land, the laying of permeable hardcore, the erection of three new bunkers (with associated tank and a below ground sump), new access points to the leased land and new fencing. These works commenced in late 2011 and have now been completed The compost dispatch storage area will be used for the storage of packaged compost products on pallets, and loose compost will be stored in three new concrete bunkers. At this stage, the material that has been composted will not be classed as waste, and will not require any further reprocessing. Proposed Scheme Operation 2.21 When operating at 85,000 tonnes per annum 22 staff will be required to operate the site. The proposed operation hours are the same as the existing Currently two hook lift lorries are used to move the composting vessels around the site. With the increase in composting vessel numbers, three hook lift lorries will be used. Efficiency improvements has meant that there is no increase in waiting time for these lorries with the increase in composting vessels. The proposed scheme will operate with 91 composting vessels Pallets will be distributed on the compost dispatch storage area for the storage of finished compost. Pallets will be taken out to the compost dispatch storage area on a flat bed trailer pulled by a standard tractor and placed into position with a fork lift The dispatch area is to the west of the access road. Pallets ready for dispatch will be brought into this area by fork lift. The number of pallets utilised on site will not change from current levels The bunkers will hold up to 500 tonnes of loose material. This will be taken out by tractor and trailer and loaded into bulk trailers by front loader on dispatch. Compost will be stored to a height of no more than 4 m at the centre of the bunkers It is anticipated that there will be 11 additional car/ light goods vehicles (LGV) trips and 12 additional heavy goods vehicles (HGV) trips to and from the proposed scheme during operation, compared to the consented operation. NTS-4

9 Proposed Scheme Construction 2.27 The construction of the compost dispatch storage area commenced in late The following construction activities were undertaken: the land leased was stripped of of approximately 1,936 cubic yards topsoil and reused on the farmers land; 4,792 tonnes of permeable hardcore has been laid on the leased land. This was made up of crushed limestone, sourced from Longcliff Quarry; new access points have been created to the acquired land. One access point is located by the bunkers, and the second access point is located to the south of the maturation shed; new fencing has been erected around the leased land. The fencing will be approximately 2.4 m in height and green in colour to reduce any potential visual intrusion; and three new bunkers with associated tank and a below ground sump have been constructed to the south of the reception building for the storage of finished compost Some landscaping works will be implemented at the southern end of the site. Landscaping proposals were submitted to the Council in September 2011 and were approved on 11 th November It is considered that these measures will help to strengthen the local landscape character Temporary site fencing was erected and maintained to secure the site during the construction phase The concrete bunkers have been constructed on a new concrete base, fitted with an underground drainage system. Each bunker is 3 m in height, 10 m deep and 17 m wide A Construction Management Plan was drawn up prior to the commencement of construction activities, which detailed the procedures to be put in place to minimise the impacts of the works on the environment. The Construction Management Plan detailed the permitted working day, construction traffic, parking arrangements and incorporated environmental protection measure Parking facilities for construction vehicles and private transportation were located within the proposed scheme site. Consideration of Alternatives 2.33 A number of options were considered by Vital Earth to continue operation on the current site, or to move elsewhere if the current composting facility site was not to increase its permitted operations To continue operations at the current site without increasing the tonnage processed, the site would have to revert back to operating at the 2005 permitted tonnage of 60,000 tonnes per annum. This would invariably create a shortfall in composting services in the local area, which would mean that those Councils currently using the site for processing biodegradable waste would have to either limit the amount of waste collected, or create contracts with other companies. Alternative existing composting facilities are located further away than the current Vital Earth site, and therefore are not considered as practical as the current location of the site For Vital Earth to increase their operational capacity without the proposed scheme, Vital Earth would have to move their composting facility to a new location. A number of alternative sites NTS-5

10 have been assessed according to their location, size, transport links and proximity to residential dwellings and other environmentally sensitive receptors A site in Longcliffe with an existing approval was specifically considered as a potential new site location. However the Environment Agency raised concerns over the utilisation of the site and therefore Vital Earth has not progressed with this site The current site location is considered to the best available location for the composting facility. 3 Planning Policy 3.1 The proposed scheme has been considered in terms of its compliance with relevant national, regional and local policy, which includes the following: The Waste Strategy 2000 (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), 2000); The Waste Strategy 2007 (DETR, 2007); PPS 1: Delivering Sustainable Development (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), 2005); Planning and Climate Change (2007) Supplement to PPS 1(Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2007); PPS 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management (DCLG, amended 2011); PPG 13: Transport (DCLG, amended 2011); PPS 23: Planning and Pollution Control (ODPM, 2004); PPG 24: Planning and Noise (DCLG, 1994); Draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Communities and Local Government, 2011); East Midland s Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) (Government Office for the East Midlands, 2006); Derby and Derbyshire Waste Local Plan (Derby City Council and Derbyshire County Council, 2005); and Derbyshire Dales Local Plan (Derby City Council, 2005). 3.2 Overall, the proposed scheme is considered to comply with national, regional and local planning policy and aspirations. 4 Water Quality and Drainage 4.1 This assessment considers the potential impacts and effects from the construction and operation of the proposed scheme on groundwater and surface water drainage. 4.2 Surface waterbodies in the wider vicinity of the composting facility were identified but due to a combination of distance from the composting facility, topography and obstruction to drainage pathways (i.e. road networks etc) none of the identified surface waterbodies were considered to have the potential to be effected by the proposed scheme and therefore were not considered further in this assessment. NTS-6

11 4.3 Receptors that could have been/ be affected include: groundwater (bedrock Secondary B Aquifer); and surface water drainage system (including culverted Snipesmoor Brook). Construction 4.4 The standard impact avoidance measures implemented during construction reduced the risk of adverse effects occurring during construction of the proposed scheme. These included implementation of planning policy guidance, construction staff awareness and training, implementation of pollution plans and the appropriate discharge/ disposal of site runoff. 4.5 No significant effects were identified during the construction of the proposed scheme, such as effects from accidental leakage/ spillage of pollutants, contaminated runoff, suspended sediment, pollution from foul drainage and changes in surface water runoff rates in relation to the receptors. 4.6 There was the potential for a minor adverse effect on the water quality/ supply of the Secondary B Aquifer from the accidental leakage or spillage of pollutants during construction. Operation 4.7 As a general measure, to protect ground and surface water from a range of activities associated with the operation of the composting facility best practice will be implemented through the existing Site Operations and Safe Working Practices Manual (Vital Earth, 2011) which includes environmental procedures and management. 4.8 No significant effects have been identified during the operation of the proposed scheme as a result of accidental leakage/ spillage of pollutants, contaminated runoff, suspended sediment, pollution from foul drainage and changes in surface water runoff rates in relation to the receptors. 5 Transport 5.1 This assessment considers the impacts and effects of the construction and operation of the proposed scheme on the environmental receptors along the surrounding highway network. 5.2 The study area considered in this assessment includes Blenheim Road and Derby Road/ Blenheim Road T-junction. 5.3 Staff will be encouraged to car share as an alternative to single occupancy car trips to and from the site. Construction 5.4 During the construction of the proposed scheme, a Construction Management Plan was implemented to minimise the impact of the proposed scheme on the surrounding road network. NTS-7

12 5.5 The construction of the proposed scheme led to a small increase in the traffic on the surrounding road network. However, this assessment demonstrated that the small increase would not have had a significant effect on receptors during construction. Operation 5.6 The proposed scheme will lead to a small increase in the traffic on the surrounding road network. However, this assessment has demonstrated that the small increase is not estimated to have a significant effect on receptors during operation. 6 Noise 6.1 This assessment considers the potential impacts and effects on noise receptors from the construction and operation of the proposed scheme. Receptors considered include the nearest residential receptors to the site, and the routes taken by HGVs. 6.2 Although the number of operational composting vessels has increased (stored to the east of the maturation shed) the maturation shed and other buildings on the Airfield Industrial estate provide sufficient shielding of this fan noise to nearest receptors located to the south-west. With regards to the receptors located to the east, due to the distance between the proposed scheme site and these receptors it is unlikely that noise levels will have risen from the increase in the number of vessels. In addition, it is understood that the air inlet fans are acoustically silenced. Any increase in noise levels is not likely to be significant, and therefore an assessment of increases in fixed or mobile plant noise was not required. 6.3 The operation of the compost dispatch storage area will result in a small number of new mobile plant activities on site, required to move the compost to and from the main site. With the low number and frequency of mobile plant movements and the implementation of impact avoidance measures there is not considered to be any potential for significant effects on noise receptors and therefore an assessment was not required. Construction 6.4 During construction, the contractor followed best practicable measures to minimise any potential noise effects from the site clearance, construction of bunkers or the laying of hardcore upon the noise receptors. 6.5 During the construction the predicted noise levels did not result in a significant effect on noise receptors. Operation 6.6 The existing Site Operations and Safe Working Practices Manual (Vital Earth, 2011) will continue to apply for the operation of the composting facility at the increased tonnage. 6.7 The operation on the compost dispatch storage area will adhere to all the noise conditions detailed as part of the planning permission for the compost dispatch storage area. 6.8 During operation, there will be no increase in road traffic noise levels and therefore there will be no significant effects on noise receptors as a result of the proposed scheme. NTS-8

13 7 Air Quality, Dust, Odour and Bioaerosol 7.1 This assessment considers the potential on air quality, dust, odour and bioaerosol receptors from the construction and operation of the proposed scheme. 7.2 It has been assumed that dust generating activities within the site are subject to standard dust suppression measures. 7.3 Recent improvements to the composting operations at the Vital Earth site have lead to a reduction in the number of complaints received about the site regarding odour. The improvements to the process have been made while the site has been running at a throughput in excess of 80,000 tonnes per annum. 7.4 Regular monitoring has shown that the facility does not produce bioaerosol emissions with the potential to significantly effect sensitive receptors. Construction 7.5 During construction, dust generating activities were subject to standard dust suppression measures and therefore the effect on surrounding receptors was, at worst, minor adverse. 7.6 No significant adverse effects occurred from traffic or dust emissions during the construction of the proposed scheme. 7.7 Subject to standard dust suppression measures, there was also the potential for minor adverse effects on dust receptors from dust generating activities during construction. Dust incidents at individual receptors would have been infrequent and of a short duration. Operation 7.8 No significant adverse effects are predicted to occur from traffic, dust, odour or bioaerosol emissions during the operation of the proposed scheme. 7.9 Standard dust suppression measures will be used during operation, and therefore a minor adverse effect, at worst, on dust receptors from dust generating activities may occur during operation The overall effect on local air quality from the proposed increase in permitted throughput at the Vital Earth site would not be significant. 8 Cumulative and Combined Effects 8.1 Cumulative effects are those that can occur when two or more developments affect the same environmental feature. These effects have been assessed by identifying other proposed developments nearby, and considering their potential effects. 8.2 Those developments identified as having the potential for significant cumulative effects with the proposed scheme are: erection of two storey industrial unit and associated car parking; NTS-9

14 erection of two storey office block, extension to workshop and recladding of existing workshop; erection of three industrial units; erection of two bay workshop extension; and extension to existing warehouse. Cumulative Effects Construction 8.3 No significant cumulative effects have been identified during the construction of the composting facility and the other proposed developments. Operation 8.4 The potential for a significant beneficial cumulative effect on surface water drainage during the operation of the composting facility and the other proposed developments has been identified. In line with national policy, any new development must improve the current surface water runoff rates, and should meet the Environment Agency/ Local Authority s requirements. If this can be achieved by the composting facility and the other proposed developments then a significant beneficial cumulative impact will be seen. 8.5 No other significant cumulative effects have been identified during the operation of the Composting facility and the other proposed developments. Combined Effects 8.6 Combined effects, which may occur when two different types of effect from the proposed scheme come together to affect a particular feature (e.g. noise and dust effects on a residential property during construction), have also been assessed. 8.7 No significant combined effects have been identified during the construction or operation of the proposed scheme. 9 Summary of Environmental Effects Construction 9.1 No significant effects have been identified as a result of the construction of the proposed scheme. 9.2 There was the potential for a minor adverse effect on the water quality/ supply of the Secondary B Aquifer from the accidental leakage or spillage of pollutants during construction. 9.3 Subject to standard dust suppression measures, there was also the potential for minor adverse effects on dust receptors from dust generating activities during construction. Dust incidents at individual receptors would have been infrequent and of a short duration. 9.4 All remaining effects from construction are considered to be neutral. NTS-10

15 Operation 9.5 No significant adverse effects have identified, but one potential significant beneficial cumulative effect has been identified as a result of the operation of the proposed scheme and the other proposed developments with regards to the generation of surface water. 9.6 Standard dust suppression measures will be used during operation, and therefore a minor adverse effect, at worst, on dust receptors from dust generating activities may occur during operation. 9.7 All remaining effects are considered to be neutral during the operation of the proposed scheme. 10 References Communities and Local Government (2011) Draft National Planning Policy Framework Derby City Council (2005) Derbyshire Dales Local Plan Derby City Council and Derbyshire County Council (2005) Derby and Derbyshire Waste Local Plan DCLG (1994) Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise, HMSO DCLG (2007) Planning and Climate Change: Supplement to PPS1, HMSO DCLG (July 2005, amended March 2011) Planning Policy Statement 10 (PPS 10) Planning for Sustainable Waste Management, HMSO DCLG (first published March 2001, amended January 2011) Planning Policy Guidance Note 13 (PPG 13) Transport, HMSO Government Office for the East Midlands (2006) Regional Spatial Strategy, TSO; ODPM (2004) Planning Policy Guidance Notes 23 (PPG23) Planning and Pollution Control, HMSO ODPM (2005) Planning Policy Statement 1 (PPS1) Delivering Sustainable Development, HMSO Vital Earth (2011) Site Operations and Safe Working Practices Manual NTS-11

16 Figure 1 Location Plan Figure 1

17 Key Site Boundary Site Location Composting vessels Existing palisade fence Proposed access Tank Proposed access El Sub Sta Glencroft Orchard House Coxbridge Proposed concrete apron Proposed 3 No bunker Def The Bungalow LB Proposed pallet storage areas Proposed palisade fence Job Title Drawing Title VITAL EARTH LTD COMPOSTING FACILITY SITE LOCATION PLAN Scales at A4 1:50,000 & NTS Drawn Approved CLH HP Stage 1 check Stage 2 check Originated Date HP LEEDS Drawing number D137323/NTS/001 This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of URS Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. URS Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. URS Scott Wilson Ltd 2011 Revision Details Copyright By Check Date Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data (c) Crown copyright All rights reserved. Licence number Suffix URS Scott Wilson WESTONE Leeds LS1 1BA Telephone (0113) Fax (0113) Figure Number FIGURE 1