BIOGAS IN TRANSPORT BEST PRACTICE FROM BIOGAS2020

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BIOGAS IN TRANSPORT BEST PRACTICE FROM BIOGAS2020"

Transcription

1 BIOGAS IN TRANSPORT BEST PRACTICE FROM BIOGAS2020 Phuong Ninh & Krzysztof Janko NTU ApS Fredrikstad, 25th April 2018

2 What is BioGas2020 and NTU s role in it? 35 PARTNERS 3 COUNTRIES NTU APS COORDINATOR OF WP5 - TRANSPORT 11 ACTIVITIES SHOWCASING BIOGAS BENEFITS IN TRANSPORT IDENTIFYING MAIN BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES

3 Why biogas in heavy transport? COST-EFFECTIVNESS 60-80% REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONS LOCAL ECONOMY

4

5 What is the report about? 30 CASES PUBLIC PRIVATE FLEET MANAGERS CSR/ ENVIRONMENT SPECIALISTS DECISION-MAKERS

6 What we wanted to find out? WHY? WHAT? HOW?

7 Sweden s leading the peloton Biogas market potential Denmark Norway Sweden Natural and biogas stations Natural gas vehicles Source: NGVA Europe, 2017; Biogass Oslofjord, 2018; gasbiler.info, 2018)

8 Denmark the incentive desert Vil være first movers. Være de første der fik erfaring inden for kørsel på biogas. Gas er den eneste mulighed som er her og så virker Rent politisk har man sendt mange signaler om at tung transport skal på gas, men man har intet gjort for at understøtte det Største udfordring er den manglende infrastruktur

9 Norway competing alternatives Informasjonen bør være mer tilgjengelig enn det den er i dag. Sammenheng mellom tilgjengelig kjøretøy, og fyllmuligheter er viktig. A support system to secure a lower, stable and more a more competitive price on biogas fuel is appreciated. We want to be a part of the green change

10 Sweden signs of stagnation Långsiktiga styrmedel för biodrivmedel och produktionsstöd (såsom i resten av Europa) istället för användningsstöd Det är lite svårt att motivera förutom miljöaspekten då lastbilarna är dyrare i inköp, dyrare service och dåligt andrahandsvärde kvalitén är det stora problemet, viss gas är så dålig att motorerna på lastbilarna börjar hacka Många inom framför allt hemtjänst upplever att det är krångligare att tanka, det tar längre tid och finns en del oro kring tankning av biogas

11 Who is driving the change? Non-public tasks Private Public Public tasks

12 Where is the incentive? Instrument Denmark Norway Sweden Fuel tax exemptions DEMAND Vehicle tax exemptions Other tax exemptions (congestion/parking fee) Vehicle purchase grants RD&D grants Investment grants/loans SUPPLY (production and distribution) Subsidising supply of feedstock Subsidising fuel sales Caveat: This table does NOT represent the current state of legislation in the respective countries. The table presents an overview of financial instruments that have been used by the three countries in the recent years.

13 A bumpy ride for biogas Environmental and waste regulations Eco-branding Total cost of ownership Lacking infrastructure Drivers Challenges Public procurement Suitability for longrange transport Lack of clear political vision and incentives Lacking awareness

14 Light at the end of the tunnel Growing awareness Circular economy central to future economies Opportunities Costs should drop over time The infrastructure the same as for natural gas Increasing pressure to move away from diesel and towards more sustainable fuels

15 What are the takeaways? the change is still mostly driven by the public sector strong commitment from the leadership predictable political environment a way to brand the company appropriate cooperation between private actors and public authorities need to harmonise the legislation across borders

16 Thank you for attention! Contact: NTU ApS Phuong Ninh Tel.: Krzysztof Janko Tel.: