PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN UPDATE (POPS) POPS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN UPDATE (POPS) POPS"

Transcription

1 PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN UPDATE (POPS) POPS Advisory Committee February 19, 2019 NOTE: This presentation is a working document, and some recommendations or ideas may have evolved or changed based on continued discussions and additional analyses. 1

2 AGENDA Final Draft Input Revisions: o Strategic Directions o Level of Service o Athletic Fields (lighting) Next Steps 2

3 FINAL POPS Final Draft Feedback: 285 responses online + approx. 50 s Themes o Level of Service o Athletic fields o Pump Tracks, Cyclocross, Mountain Biking/Trails o Pickleball courts 3

4 NEXT STEPS Approval Process: March Request to Advertise (RTA): o Planning Commission: March 4, 6 or 7 o County Board: March 16 or 19 April Action: o Planning Commission: April 8 or 10 o County Board: April 23 or 25 4

5 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) New priority action: o Analyze athletic field utilization to improve data on the current use and assess future athletic field needs. The County will work with the community to determine a set of use assumptions that will enable consistent evaluation of field utilization and capacity. New action steps: o Conduct a study of residual rights-of-way to determine if such spaces could be used for public space purposes on a temporary or permanent basis. o When developing plans for public spaces, include intentionally designed casual use spaces where appropriate. Casual use spaces have already been incorporated in the park master plans for Short Bridge Park (2018), Jennie Dean Park (2018), Shirlington Park (2018), and framework plan for Benjamin Banneker (2017)ḌRAFT Park 5

6 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) New action steps: Define a transparent civic engagement process for adding lights to athletic fields. The majority of athletic fields in Arlington are located within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Establishing a clear civic engagement process for new locations of field lighting, and fully exploring possible mitigation measures and potential changes in use patterns, would ensure that the potential impact to adjacent residences is appropriately considered Explore connection between conversion of grass fields to synthetic turf and addition of lights and the need for new fields based on the Level of Service (see Appendix II: Level of Service & Appendix III, Fields: Synthetic Turf and Lighting). Level of Service standards estimate that Arlington will need an additional 11 rectangular fields and 2 diamond fields by Adding synthetic turf and lighting to existing fields help alleviate the demand for additional field space. However, additional review and analysis is needed to better inform how the additional hours of play gained through conversion to synthetic turf and lighting impact the need for new fields Seek opportunities to go beyond the minimum ADA requirements, when possible, to ensure the broadest access to public amenities. 6

7 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) New action step: Create a process and guidelines for developing parklets. Parklets are publicly accessible to all and serve as extensions of the sidewalk by converting curbside parking spaces into vibrant public spaces. Parklets are social platforms for the community, and are often developed through a partnership with the County, local businesses, and neighborhood organizations. Despite their size and atypical location, parklets can contribute to the public space network and overall sidewalk experience by providing places to sit, relax, or socialize. Future installations of parklets can increase social activity and enhance the pedestrian experience in the urban corridors throughout the County. 7

8 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) Additional Edits: o Conduct a public space needs assessment, including a statistically valid survey and level of service analysis, on a 5-year cycle. As the County needs, trends and population projections may change, conducting a needs assessment and reviewing and updating level of service analysis and methodology on a regular basis would allow the County to keep pace with these changes and adjust its recommendations accordingly. In addition, the County will periodically evaluate existing and gather new data on public space amenities, such as casual use spaces, natural lands, dog parks/runs, trails, athletic fields, community gardens, etc., to refine the Level of Service standards and approaches in the future. o Undertake Consider completing an inventory of casual use spaces to better understand their distribution and gaps. Casual use space is a new concept, and as such, has not been inventoried. Further refining this concept should enable an inventory to be completed. o Explore Consider exploring opportunities to develop standards for casual use spaces. As this concept is new and there is no inventory or benchmarking data available, the County should explore ways to develop standards for casual use spaces. 8

9 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) PAGE 63 IN THE FINAL 9

10 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) Explore opportunities to provide all-season access to certain high use athletic fields, commensurate with demand, through the use of temporary or permanent structures. Historically, athletic programs were more seasonal, with different sports seasons having less overlap. In recent years, the seasons are being extended and some are played yearround. However, Arlington s climate is not always conducive to outdoor winter athletics. Temporary, climate controlled structures around outdoor athletic fields or permanent, indoor recreation centers with full size athletic fields could be possible solutions to providing all-season access and may help alleviate the need for additional fields Explore Identify the locations for two new multi-use activity centers to provide year-round access to indoor athletic courts and fields Establish Explore the identification of a dedicated pickleball facility to meet the growing demand. 10

11 REVISIONS: SD1 (PUBLIC SPACES) Review and consider updating the County s zoning regulations related to parks and public spaces in S-3A and PS districts, and other County codes as needed, related to public processes, setbacks, athletic field and other lighting, parking and parking options, signage, height, water features, fencing, and temporary use of public and private property as public space. - to provide appropriate design flexibility and respond to high-density contexts and efficient use of limited public space. 11

12 REVISIONS: SD2 (TRAILS) New action & action steps: 2.2. Improve existing trails that currently do not meet design standards or user demands Undertake a system wide evaluation of the multiuse trails. Identify deficiencies where trails either do not meet current standards or no longer meet user demand due to heavy use Develop guidelines for trail lighting that will ensure safety of trail users while balancing impact on natural resources Explore opportunities to provide a space for pump tracks and cyclocross on a temporary or permanent basis, while balancing potential impacts on natural resources and trees. Arlington does not currently provide opportunities for pump tracks or cyclocross. As part of the PSMP Update process, members of the community expressed interest in this type of amenities as that can provide additional experience for cyclists to recreate and practice riding skills. Some community members were also interested in mountain biking, however, mountain biking would need to have a robust and broad community conversation to understand the needs of the users and impacts on the natural environment prior to any consideration. Additional trail related edits: Existing Public Space System (Trails section) page 40 in the Final Draft: Connecting trails were removed and combined with the secondary use trails. 12

13 REVISIONS: SD2 (TRAILS) Inner & Outer Loop Map- revised to be more conceptual 13

14 REVISIONS: SD3 (RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP) New action step: Create pollinator corridors within parks and street medians, where appropriate. Many pollinator habitats within the County are small and fragmented with little connectivity between them. Pollinator populations are therefore often isolated and small in numbers. The creation of pollinator corridors connecting those in parks and other public open spaces will help reduce or reverse the population declines that such pollinators as honeybees and monarch butterflies are experiencing. 14

15 REVISIONS: SD6 (OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE) New action step: Consider design and maintenance measures (like snow removal) that permit more year-round use of trails and other public spaces. 15

16 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1)- LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Introduction section (add language): o The PSMP is a long-term plan that provides numerous aspirational goals and tools for the development and management of public spaces. As such, the estimated future amenities needed by 2035 based on the level of service analysis are aspirational goals, that may not always be fully achievable, but they provide a baseline for future planning. In addition, there are different ways to achieve these aspirational goals. For example, converting existing grass fields to synthetic turf and/or adding lights can increase the number of hours of play to meet the demand for fields, or dividing full community garden plots into two half plots to double the number of available plots (see Case Studies on page 176). o Level of service standards can and will change over time as industry trends change and demographic trends of a community change. The County will update its inventory of recreation amenities annually and will reexamine the recommended level of service standards at least every five years as the needs assessment is updated. The County will continue to seek ways to improve its planning tools, including refining the type and reliability of data representing projected future need (see 1.2.4). 16

17 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1)- LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Population-based standards section (add language): Population-based standards are expressed as a level of service (LOS) ratio of amenities to population. The current ratio is then compared to a target recommended ratio, which indicates whether more or fewer amenities are needed. The recommended level of service standards were evaluated using the current level of service, demographic data, community and stakeholder input, a statistically valid community survey, benchmark data, and national averages. These factors were not weighted, but rather used as a guide to help determine the recommended standard. The result is a set of recommended standards for Arlington County that will be used as a planning tool, together with other considerations. 17

18 REVISIONS IN SD1 RELATED TO LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Related Revisions in SD1: o Analyze athletic field utilization to improve data on the current use and assess future athletic field needs. The County will work with the community to determine a set of use assumptions that will enable consistent evaluation of field utilization and capacity. o Explore connection between conversion of grass fields to synthetic turf and addition of lights and the need for new fields based on the Level of Service (see Appendix II: Level of Service & Appendix III, Fields: Synthetic Turf and Lighting). Level of Service standards estimate that Arlington will need an additional 11 rectangular fields and 2 diamond fields by Adding synthetic turf and lighting to existing fields help alleviate the demand for additional field space. However, additional review and analysis is needed to better inform how the additional hours of play gained through conversion to synthetic turf and lighting impact the need for new fields. 18

19 APPENDIX II (1) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS TABLE)- CURRENT VERSION PAGES 174 & 175 IN THE FINAL 19

20 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1) LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS TABLE) Additional notes: 1. Natural lands inventory will be reviewed and updated as part of the update process for the Natural Resources Management Plan and Urban Forestry Master Plan. 2. There are different ways to meet the level of service goals, besides adding new facilities. For example, installing additional synthetic turf, and additional lighting on fields are tools to expand the available hours of play and meet the level of service goals without constructing new fields (see ). The FY19-FY28 CIP identifies several projects to convert grass to synthetic turf at Thomas Jefferson Park and Kenmore Middle School. The Gunston diamond field is being converted to synthetic in Population estimates data: ,560; ,782; ,302 (source: the Arlington County Profile from 2016 and the Arlington Round 9 Population Forecast also from 2016) 20

21 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1) ATHLETIC FIELDS Introduction (add language) page 196 in the Final Draft : The installation of new lights to any field where there were none before has the potential to create concern and anxiety in the areas these amenities are located. Neighbors, especially in residential areas, may have concerns over what the changes may bring, such as, additional traffic, increased parking need, increased noise, and increased light levels and/or glare issues, among others. To help address these concerns, this PSMP includes a list of mitigation measures for sites when considering installing lighting. The list is not intended to be all inclusive and if other potential mitigation measures become available, they can be applied as needed and added to the list. Additionally, this document calls for the use of best technology to achieve efficiency, light uniformity and visual comfort while minimizing light spillage. This best technology should be considered on a case-by-case basis as to how it relates to the concerns listed above and if and what is appropriate for specific sites. The following criteria and standards for synthetic turf and lighting provide a set of data to begin to identify and prioritize fields for adding synthetic turf and/or lighting. Other factors include field ownership, potential site development and the ability to meet the surrounding community s need for light and noise mitigation. Such mitigations may include, but are not limited to, vegetative barriers, fencing, field elevation, stadium seating, and limited hours of usage or curfews. When the top candidates are identified for synthetic turf conversion and/or lighting, and funding is available, there will be a civic engagement process to evaluate potential impacts, changes in use patterns and the effectiveness of mitigation measures (see 1.5.5). 21

22 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1) ATHLETIC FIELDS Field lighting standards: Final Draft language (page 212 in the Final Draft): A. In residential areas, the proposed field lighting will be designed and installed to ensure less than or equal to 0.5 foot candles increase at adjacent residential property lines. Potential edits: o Option 1. Proposed field lighting will be designed and installed to ensure less than or equal to 0.3 to 0.8 foot candles increase at adjacent residential property lines. If technology allows for improvements to this standard, the County will utilize designs and equipment that will do so. o Option 2. As lighting technology continues to improve to address energy efficiency and the ability to minimize spill and glare, the County will use the most current approaches to mitigate light intrusion by reducing spill light and glare to the lowest levels feasible at the residential property line. Other jurisdictions such as Fairfax County after exhaustive testing and research through unique studies and processes, not in a comprehensive plan, have determined specific light spill and glare levels, such as using a range of 0.3fc to 0.8 fc measured 150 feet from the edge of the playing surface for spill light. As this document is a policy level document and was not supported by specific technical expertise, defined specifications are not included. At the time of any future capital lighting project initiative or the development of a field lighting program in the County s CIP, the County will undertake the process described in the Scoring Fields Against the Lighting Criteria section. At that time, specific designs for the candidate list of fields will be undertaken for analysis and the technical specifications of spill and glare will be taken into consideration to determine what field(s) to be lighted will be recommended to the County Board for future funding opportunities. 22

23 REVISIONS: APPENDIX II (1) ATHLETIC FIELDS Field lighting process (Scoring Field Against Field Lighting Criteria, page 213 in the Final Draft) Add language: As part of any future capital lighting project initiative or the development of a field lighting program in the County s CIP, with direction from the County Board, staff will take the top 3 to 5 candidates from the list of fields scored against the lighting criteria and conduct an analysis of the impact of adding lights using the Standards and Mitigation Measures described in this Appendix III. Additionally that analysis will evaluate the candidate fields for certain key considerations as described in Section IV Follow-on Recommendations of the Williamsburg Field Site Evaluation Workgroup Report, particularly those key considerations related to state of development of the area; topography, physical features and the presence of existing lighting in the area; the proximity of homes; and environmental impacts. Based on that more detailed analysis, the appropriate field(s) to be lighted will be presented to the County Board for future funding opportunities. 23

24 REVISIONS IN SD1 RELATED TO ATHLETIC FIELDS New action steps: Define a transparent civic engagement process for adding lights to athletic fields. The majority of athletic fields in Arlington are located within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Establishing a clear civic engagement process for new locations of field lighting, and fully exploring possible mitigation measures and potential changes in use patterns, would ensure that the potential impact to adjacent residences is appropriately considered Explore connection between conversion of grass fields to synthetic turf and addition of lights and the need for new fields based on the Level of Service (see Appendix II: Level of Service & Appendix III, Fields: Synthetic Turf and Lighting). Level of Service standards estimate that Arlington will need an additional 11 rectangular fields and 2 diamond fields by Adding synthetic turf and lighting to existing fields help alleviate the demand for additional field space. However, additional review and analysis is needed to better inform how the additional hours of play gained through conversion to synthetic turf and lighting impact the need for new fields. 24

25 Q&A 25