A next-generation smart grid without energy storage is like a computer without a hard drive: severely limited. - Katie Fehrenbacher, GigaOm 1

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A next-generation smart grid without energy storage is like a computer without a hard drive: severely limited. - Katie Fehrenbacher, GigaOm 1"

Transcription

1 A next-generation smart grid without energy storage is like a computer without a hard drive: severely limited. - Katie Fehrenbacher, GigaOm 1

2 Presentation includes: RheEnergise Innovation: A High-Technology Fluid The Potential Market for Pumped Energy Storage Test Results Mapping studies Supply Chain Opportunities Next Steps 2

3 The High-Technology Fluid Density 2.5 times water Viscosity cp 70 Abrasion: Mohs hardness of 3.0 Benign, non-toxic, non-corrosive, non-reactive Available and affordable 3

4 Why use a High-Density Fluid? Pumped Energy Storage Basics Power = Efficiency x Fluid Density x Flow rate x Gravitational acceleration x Head Already excellent 80% + Who s explored density? A variable affecting cost Too difficult to alter Site Dependent 4

5 Why use a High-Density Fluid? For given head the High-Technology Fluid provides 2.5 times the power. For a given volume of storage it provides 2.5 times the energy. For power equivalence penstocks, valves, turbines etc. will be considerably smaller. Opportunities for pumped energy storage in markets with minimal water resource. 5

6 Opportunity Energy Storage Market To Hit $50bn by 2020 Remember: Hybrid Solar/ Wind and Energy Storage to reach $1.5bn by 2024 Total Global energy storage today is only 175GW of which pumped hydro is 168GW. 30% more than all pumped hydro installed globally to date. Energy Storage CAGR (Annual Growth Rate) of 20% Energy storage investment: 1,291GW by (BNEF) UK: 49GW energy storage by 2050 (4% global total). 83% supplied by renewables. (BNEF) Battery Energy Storage Market To Reach 250GW by 2030 (2.5GW today) 1,000GW energy storage and 5,000GW renewables by 2030 and 3,000GW energy storage by (IRENA) 6

7 Revenues Available Gas Peaking. Welsh Power Projects Three Gas Peaking plants in various UK locations built and managed by Welsh Power Cadoxton 16MW Redlake 16MW Cynon 16MW Total Annual Revenues 2,620,000 1,400,000 2,610,000 Revenues / MW 164,000 88, ,000 6MW Battery Storage. Milton Keynes Smarter Network Storage demonstration. High CAPEX Total Annual Revenues 2017: 2,400,000 Revenues / MW 2017: 400,000 Revenue indications derived from publically available company account information (e.g. Companies House). Top-level summary information available only. First Hydro 2,088 MW (Dinorwig & Ffestiniog) 2 First Hydro Pumped Storage Facilities Total Annual Revenues: 271,000,000 Revenues / MW: 130,000 Revenues / MWh

8 RheEnergise Market Opportunity 8

9 Test Rig Set-up Presurisedsystem to achieve 5 BAR Pressure release & system drain Twin nozzle 1.0 kw Pelton Max water efficiency 52% Reservoir 4kW Pump Sensors measuring: Temperature Pressure Density Flow-rate 9

10 Test Rig Results Generatorpower vs. volumetric flow rate Power (W) 2.26 x power Water H-TF S.G Volumetric Flow Rate (l/s) 10

11 CFD Results: Un-optimised 100% Francis Turbine Design Efficiency 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% CASE RPM N V HITECH SIZE FLUID FLUID SITE Torque EFFICIENCY High-Tech FLUID SG2.4 WATER 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV x torque m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % 26 INV m 2.4SG/75cP 75m 5MW % WATER W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV - 175velocity 750at penstock 78.54in m/s m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % W41 INV m 1.0SG/1cP 75m 5MW % 11

12 Pumped Hydro Locations Pumped Hydro correlated with regions where rainfall is over 100cm/ year. Approx 25% global land mass. RheEnergise opportunities in the other 75% 12

13 Mapping Studies: Site Numbers Constraints: No more than one site in any 5km x 5km square No more that 1.5km between top & bottom store tanks 13

14 Mapping Studies: Site Numbers 3 times as many sites at 100m head than at 250m head (m) 14

15 Mapping Studies: UK Site Numbers Constraint mapping includes: ANOB/ SSSI etc. Rural/ Urban Proximity to: o Grid and demand o Road & ports o RE generators Out of 8,962 identified sites, modeling suggests: 624 on-grid sites 40 off-grid sites 7.5% with suitability rating over 60% 13 GW / 40 GWhstorage potential 15

16 Supply Chain Opportunities Turbo-machinery 350,000 to 600,000 / MW 20 MW project 9.0m total > 100 projects / year opportunity > 1bn annum revenue. Penstocks: > 100 sites / annum > 150m annual revenues Civil Engineering: 400,000 / MW construction value. 2,000 MW/ annum installed. 800m / annum revenue. Logistics: 100 sites/ annum > 200m annual revenue. 16

17 Why RheEnergise Pumped Energy Storage? 2.5 x lower head required for power equivalence. > 300% more siting opportunities. Storage size 2.5 x smaller than water. Civil engineering costs lower. Accesses ancillary service markets. On-grid, Off-grid, Renewables Colocation. Eases grid constraints allowing additional connections / utilisation. 60+ year lifespan potential. Overcomes environmental challenges associated with large scale pumped hydro. Levelised cost (at maturity) 35% below Lithium-Ion batteries (20 year calculation). Efficiencies comparable to conventional pumped hydro. No parasitic cooling loads associated with batteries. New markets in hot, dry climates. Smaller distributed projects (5MWp to 50MWp) Fast consents,. Fast construction. No water extraction licenses. Commoditised offering, lowering costs. 17

18 Thank you If you wish to be part of our journey or wish to be kept up to date with progress. Stephen Crosher +44 (0)