St. Louis River Area of Concern A Great Lakes Restoration Initiative - MN Legacy Fund Partnership

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "St. Louis River Area of Concern A Great Lakes Restoration Initiative - MN Legacy Fund Partnership"

Transcription

1 St. Louis River Area of Concern A Great Lakes Restoration Initiative - MN Legacy Fund Partnership Interstate Regulatory Technology Council Annual Meeting Bloomington, MN April 20, 2016 Nelson T. French MPCA Great Lakes-Lake Superior Program

2

3 Past history - a legacy of settlement and development prior to environmental regulation Post Environmental Regulation Era Recent History Road Map development Remedial Action Plan Implementation

4 1854

5 1865

6

7 1883

8

9

10

11 Legacy Contaminants The result of many years of industrial and municipal pollution directly discharged to the St. Louis River. These discharges and their legacy are from the days prior to adoption of our current environmental protection laws and rules. The result of many years of dredging and filling the estuary to create the Duluth-Superior Port. An estimate 7,000 acres of aquatic habitat was dredged and/or filled. These habitat alterations took place prior to the adoption of our current environmental protection laws and rules. Legacy Habitat Loss

12 Enacted by Congress 1972 Established the basic structure for regulating pollutant discharges into the waters of the United States. Gave EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry.

13 Western Lake Superior Sanitary District Came on Line in 1979

14 Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Richard Nixon and Pierre Trudeau sign the historic agreement. Signed 1972: focus on nutrients; phosphorus in Lake Erie Revised 1978: more focus on toxics Revised 1987: Introduced Lakewide Management Plans and Areas of Concern Revised in 2012 continues focus on Purpose is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem

15

16

17 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

18

19 Development of Remedial Action Plan Navigated by Agencies 2.5 year process GLRI Grant to Develop Plan Area of Concern Coordinators GLRI Capacity Funded MPCA, WDNR, MDNR, Fond du Lac Band Stakeholders Engaged in Development Federal, Tribal, State and Local Government Non-Governmental Organizations Academia Citizens BUI Removal Strategies and Actions 60+ Actions from

20 Rolled out July 15, 2013 Complete major actions by 2020 Delisting the AOC by actions identified to remove all 9 Beneficial Use Impairments Planning level project costs

21

22 BUI Removal Goals Aesthetics (2014) Fish Tumors & Deformities (2016) Excessive Loading (2017) Nutrients & Sediment Fish & Wildlife Populations (2018) Beaches/Body Contact (2020) Degradation of Benthos (2022) Restrictions on Dredging (2023) Loss of Fish & Wildlife Habitat (2025) Fish Consumption Advisories (2025)

23

24 St. Louis River Area of Concern Remedial Action Plan Remediation and Restoration Sites

25 Progress Towards Completing Management Actions Delisted AOCs: Oswego June 2016 Presque Isle Feb 2013 Deer Lake--Oct 2014 White Lake--Oct 2014 Actions Complete: Ashtabula Sheboygan White Lake 2015 St Clair 2016 River Raisin Buffalo Rochester Menominee St. Marys Clinton R. Black R. 2017/2018 Manistique Muskegon 2019/2020 St. Louis Detroit Grand Cal Milwaukee Fox/Green Bay Cuyahoga Maumee St Lawrence 18 Mile Creek Niagara Torch Lake Rouge River Kalamazoo Saginaw

26

27 Use of Dredge Material for Habitat Restoration

28 Innovative MPCA-USACE Partnership Site Design and Construction Pilot Project (50%) 350,000 cy of dredge material $5.3 million Harbor Maintenance $1.0 million GLRI Strategic Dredge $0.1 million Engineering w/ Nature $0.1 million from MN CWF $6.5 million

29 Environmental Review and Permitting

30 This report addresses the status of Minnesota s contaminated sediment management sites in the St. Louis River Area of Concern and documents the approach taken to determine Minnesota sites recommended for contaminated sediment management. The report identifies a total 10 sites that need attention in the next five years to implement Minnesota actions identified in the SLRAOC Remedial Action Plan.

31 Major Minnesota Actions Contaminated Sediment Cleanup Capital Budget-GLLA Projects Minnesota Slip Slip 3 Slip C Northland Pier/ AGP Slip Azcon Corp/DSPA/Garfield Slip C Ponds Behind Erie Pier Munger Landing Mud Lake West Thomson Reservoir Scanlon Reservoir Non-Capital Budget Sites Slip 2 DSPA Garfield Slip D US Steel Spirit Lake West Habitat Restoration Chambers Grove Park Perch Lake Radio Tower Bay Mud Lake Spirit Lake Knowlton Creek Watershed Kingsbury Bay St. Louis Bay Restoration 21st Avenue West 40th Avenue West Grassy Point)

32 Legacy Contaminants

33 Contaminated Sediment Sites

34 There never has been a more perfect time for restoring a place dear to Northlanders the St. Louis River from more than 130 years of accumulated environmental injury. For the first time, functional partnerships, dedicated funding and the will to achieve ambitious and realistic cleanup and restoration goals are perfectly aligned to help comprehensively restore the health of not only the headwaters of Lake Superior but the entire Great Lakes region. MPCA Commissioner John Linc Stine MNDNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr

35 We are not just gonna sit here and watch the river flow - we are going to get it delisted!