AIR DISPERSION MODELLING IN COASTAL AREAS WITH ROUGH TERRAIN, USING CALPUFF PRIME
|
|
- Gervais Randall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AIR DISPERSION MODELLING IN COASTAL AREAS WITH ROUGH TERRAIN, USING CALPUFF PRIME Marcia C. Parsons, Fracflow Consultants Inc., 154 Major s Path, St. John s, NL, Canada, A1A 5A1, Faisal Khan, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John s, NL, Canada, and John E. Gale, Fracflow Consultants Inc., 154 Major s Path, St. John s, NL, Canada, A1A 5A1. ABSTRACT To study the effects of exit temperature, exit velocity, and stack height on contaminant dispersion and concentration, the revised version of the CALPUFF air dispersion model was used to predict the dispersion of total suspended particulates (TSP) and sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions released from an industrial source in a coastal region with rough terrain. The CALPUFF model accounts for the influence that large water bodies have on atmospheric pollutant dispersion, accounts for plume rise and flow around building obstacles, and is suitable for use in areas with complex terrain. This study shows that stack heights and exit velocity are controlling factors in pollutant dispersion. An increase in the stack height and exit velocity, resulted in a decrease in maximum pollutant concentrations. When the height of the stack is increased, the effective plume rise is enhanced and this promotes buoyancy induced dispersion. An increase in exit velocity increases plume momentum leading to higher mixing and turbulent dispersion. An increase in exit temperature did not have a significant effect on concentrations near the source, but did result in a decrease in pollutant concentrations at a distance from the source due to the thermal buoyancy effect. INTRODUCTION Industrial air emissions pollute the atmosphere and have adverse effects on the environment including, plant life, human health, water bodies, and soils. As the awareness of the harmful effects of industrial air emissions increases, more resources are being allocated from government and private institutions to study 1) the effects of air emissions, 2) the control of these emissions from the various industrial sources, 3) the prediction of the dispersion patterns and pollutant concentrations using air dispersion models, and 4) the development of regulations governing the release of emissions. Ecology and human settlements located in the vicinity of air polluting industries have been adversely affected in the past. Air pollution is known to cause both short-term and long-term illnesses. Short-term health effects include irritation to the eyes, throat and lungs, allergic reactions, and upper respiratory infections (i.e., bronchitis and pneumonia). Long-term effects may include lung cancer, heart disease, chronic respiratory disease, damage to the brain, nerves, liver, and kidneys. The effects of the air pollutant(s) on human health depend on pollutant concentration and exposure, as well as duration, age and health factors. 1
2 Industry is continually aiming to reduce maximum concentrations at sensitive locations by reducing emission rates and optimizing exit stack conditions. Air dispersion modeling helps relate the emission rates and stack configurations to the corresponding pollutant concentrations in areas surrounding the source. Air dispersion modeling allows industry to determine the maximum emissions that they can release into the environment and remain in compliance with ambient air quality standards. This helps industry control air quality and evaluate the effects of improvements on technology (e.g., increasing exit velocity, external baffles, and others) on the dispersion and maximum concentration of the contaminants. In order to study the effects of exit gas velocity, stack height, and exit gas temperature on the dispersion and the concentration of air emissions at receptor locations, an air dispersion model was used to predict the dispersion of total suspended particulates (TSP) and sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions released from an industrial source. The air dispersion model used in this modeling study is a revised version of CALPUFF (Earth Tech, 2003). This document presents the findings of long-term TSP and SO 2 dispersion in a coastal region with rough terrain, incorporating CALPUFF PRIME into the model run. AIR DISPERSION MODELS Air dispersion models are a useful tool for assessing environmental air pollutant concentrations. These models are continually advancing and being developed to better predict the dispersion of industrial air emissions and the resulting pollutant concentrations in surrounding areas. By predicting the pattern of pollutant transport, the areas of high pollutant concentration, and pollutant concentrations in sensitive areas surrounding an industrial source, air dispersion models are helping determine environmental exposure to the pollutants. There are a number of air dispersion models available for predicting concentrations of air pollutants including ISC3 (Industrial Source Complex Model), AERMOD, and CALPUFF. The ISC3 model is based on the straight-line Gaussian dispersion principle and can be used in situations with flat to moderately complex terrain (USEPA, 1995). AERMOD is based on a bi-gaussian distribution and can be used in situations with flat to complex terrain. AERMOD incorporates two preprocessors, AERMET and AERMAP that process meteorological data, and terrain and receptor data, respectively. The outputs from these preprocessors are then used in AERMOD (Lakes Environmental, 2003). CALPUFF is a complex Lagrangian Gaussian puff dispersion model that takes into account many factors that enhance the accuracy of this model, relative to other models, in predicting ground level concentrations of contaminants. CALPUFF is suitable for use in study areas with complex terrain (Earth Tech, 2003). The CALPUFF modeling system is essentially a series of three linked computer models, which account for meteorological effects, atmospheric dispersion, and concentration and deposition over time. The computer models used to integrate and process these data are CALMET, CALPUFF, with the output files from CALPUFF being sorted by CALPOST. Since CALPUFF models continuous puffs of pollutants from a source and as the wind direction and velocity change from hour to hour, the 2
3 direction of movement of the individual puffs changes according to the new wind direction (USEPA, 1998). The air dispersion models are continually improving and revisions and updates are being made to current models. In recent studies, the CALPUFF model was further refined and is now able to model groundlevel concentrations of contaminants, particularly in coastal regions, with better accuracy. In a study by Fisher et al. (2003) three air dispersion models (ISC3, AERMOD, and CALPUFF) were compared. That study showed that large water bodies influence atmospheric pollutant dispersion and the CALPUFF model is the only model that is able to account for these effects. The other models have other limitations along with their inability to account for the effects of water bodies. For instance, ISC3 cannot process any terrain elevations that exceed the height of the source and tends to overestimate concentrations when the study area has complex terrain (Fisher et al., 2003). STUDY AREA The industrial emission source in this study is located in a coastal area with rough terrain in Eastern Canada. To the immediate west of the source is a small port and beyond that is a salt water bay. Directly east of the source, is steep terrain with a slope of approximately 0.4. The nearest residential area is located approximately 3 kilometres northwest of the emission source. North of the source and the residential area, the land is forested with an overall planar aspect, but with a moderate relief. An international airport, which has a meteorological station, is located approximately 3 kilometres away. This meteorological station provided the hourly upper air data and surface data required by CALMET. The upper air data include values for pressure, elevation, temperature, wind speed, and wind direction. The surface data include values for wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, ceiling height, cloud cover, surface pressure, and relative humidity. In 2003, the average monthly temperatures ranged from 8.4 degrees Celsius in February to 16.9 degrees Celsius in August (Environment Canada, 2004). Average monthly precipitation ranged from 52.4 mm in May to mm in March. During the months of December, January, February, and March, the ground was snow covered. The wind frequencies for the study area were graphed using WRPLOT View (Lakes Environmental Software). The wind rose for the model period is shown in Figure 1. The most frequent winds for the study period are from the west-southwest, followed closely by east-northeast The model domain selected was 11.2 kilometres in the x-direction (west-east) and 8.4 kilometres in the y-direction (north-south). The entire model grid has a grid spacing of 100 metres. The elevations of all of the grid points were obtained from twenty-four 1:2500 scale digital maps of the study area. In this air dispersion model, the 14 default CALPUFF land use categories were used (10, 20, -20, 30, 40, 51, 54, 55, 60, 61, 62, 70, 80, and 90; see Table 1 for details). Each land use type has six assigned values, one each for surface roughness, albedo, Bowen ratio, soil heat flux parameter, anthropogenic 3
4 heat flux, and leaf area index. The surface roughness is a measurement of the average vertical relief and small-scale irregularities of the terrain surface. The surface roughness is low for the areas in the study area classified as water bodies and is high for the areas classified as urban or built-up land and forest. The albedo is the fraction of light that is reflected by a given surface. For instance, the albedo of a snow-covered area is much higher than that of a paved parking lot. The leaf area index is the ratio of the total area of all leaves on a plant to the area of ground covered by the plant. All areas that have the potential to have plant growth have leaf area indexes assigned to them. A value of zero is assigned to the water bodies. The leaf area index is as high as seven (7) in the areas identified as forest land. MODEL RUNS To study the effects of exit temperature, exit velocity, and stack height on contaminant dispersion and concentration, a total of four model runs were completed. Run 1 is the base case, Run 2 has an increased stack height, Run 3 has an increased exit velocity, and Run 4 has an increased exit temperature (Table 2). The emission rate of SO 2 and TSP remained constant in all of the model runs. Please note that the emission rates and source characteristics, as well as stack and building heights are hypothetical to preserve client confidentiality. Building downwash was considered in each of the model runs. Building downwash effects are a significant factor in modeling the dispersion of air emissions from stacks with surrounding buildings. The approximate height of the emission stack is 55.5 metres above ground surface. The height of the building structure to the south of the stack is approximately 70 metres. The other surrounding building structures are not as high as the stack, but are of significant heights. CALPUFF PRIME was incorporated into all of the model runs. PRIME, an acronym for Plume Rise Model Enhancements, is a module that incorporates calculations into the CALPUFF model that account for plume rise and flow around building obstacles. For each model run, a total of 9,408 gridded receptors and 4 discrete receptors were identified. Discrete Receptor #1 is located in the middle of the port to the southwest of the source. Discrete Receptor #2 is located to the immediate east of the source. Discrete Receptor #3 is located in the residential area northwest of the source. Discrete Receptor #4 is located to the east of the source on elevated terrain, approximately 2 metres above the base case stack height. MODEL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The CALPUFF model predicted SO 2 and TSP dispersion in two predominant directions: northeast and southwest, reflecting the dominant wind directions apparent in the windrose diagram (Figure 1). The maximum 8-hour average SO 2 and TSP concentrations were located to the immediate northeast of the source in each of the model runs. The CALPUFF model predicted the same general dispersion of SO 2 4
5 and TSP in all runs. The SO 2 and TSP concentration isopleths for Run 1 are plotted in Figures 2 and 3. The isopleths dispersing in the southwest direction are widely spaced (demonstrating high dispersion) and the isopleths dispersing in the northeast direction are very closely spaced (demonstrating low dispersion). The close spacing of the isopleths to the northeast of the source is a result of the steep terrain in this direction. The terrain is acting as a barrier to pollutant dispersion causing the reflection of the pollutant plume and the pollutant accumulation in the area between the source and the steep slope. The base case model run (Run1) predicted higher maximum 8-hour average concentrations of SO 2 and TSP, to the immediate northeast of the source, than the other three model runs predicted. The predicted concentration of SO 2 and TSP in Run 1 was µg/m 3 and µg/m 3, respectively (Figures 2 and 3). The maximum 8-hour average concentrations decreased with increasing stack height and exit velocity. The stack height was increased by 20 metres in Run 2 from the base case, resulting in a µg/m 3 and µg/m 3 reductions in SO 2 and TSP, respectively. An increase in the stack height enhances effective plume rise and promotes buoyancy induced dispersion. Velocity was increased in Run 3 by only 5 m/s from the base case, resulting in a µg/m 3 and a µg/m 3 reduction in SO 2 and TSP, respectively. This is mainly due to increased plume momentum leading to higher mixing and turbulent dispersion. An increase in exit temperature had little effect on the maximum 8-hour average concentrations of the two pollutants. Exit temperature was increased by almost 47 percent, but the maximum concentration of SO 2 and TSP was only reduced by 0.06 µg/m 3. This clearly demonstrates that stack heights and exit velocity are among the primary factors that control dispersion at the source. The maximum concentration of pollutants for the 8-hour averaging period at the 4 discrete receptors in each model run are presented in Table 4. In the port (Discrete Receptor #1), located approximately 1.5 km to the west of the source, the increase in stack height, exit velocity, and exit temperature resulted in decreases of 12 µg/m 3, 4 µg/m 3, and 10 µg/m 3, respectively, in the 8-hour average concentration of SO 2 and TSP. Discrete Receptor #2 is located approximately 0.3 km east of the source. The increase in stack height and exit velocity resulted in decreases of 5 µg/m 3 and 8 µg/m 3, respectively, in the 8-hour average concentration of SO 2 and TSP. There was no change in the pollutant concentrations with an increase in stack temperature at Discrete Receptor #2. The residential area (Discrete Receptor #3) is located approximately 3.5 km northwest of the source. In this area, the increase in stack height and exit velocity resulted in an approximate decrease of 3 µg/m 3 and 2 µg/m 3, respectively, in the 8-hour average concentration of SO 2 and TSP. An increase in exit temperature resulted in an approximate 4 µg/m 3 decrease in SO 2 and a 3 µg/m 3 decrease in TSP. Discrete Receptor #4 located approximately 0.5 km to the east of the source on elevated terrain. The increase in stack height, exit velocity, and exit temperature resulted in decreases of approximately 8 µg/m 3, 6 µg/m 3, and 2 µg/m 3, respectively, decrease in the 8-hour average concentration of SO 2 and TSP. 5
6 From the above analysis, it is evident that an increase in exit temperature does not have a significant effect on concentrations near the source, but does tend to result in a decrease in pollutant concentrations at a distance from the source. This is due to the thermal buoyancy effect whose effect appears at a distance from the source. For instance, when the exit temperature was increased by almost 47 percent, there was an approximate 10 µg/m 3 decrease in the maximum pollutant concentrations 1.5 km away from the source, and no change in pollutant concentrations at a receptor 0.3 km away from the source. APPLICATIONS By relating the emission rates, exit stack characteristics, and site specific conditions to the corresponding pollutant concentrations in areas surrounding the source, air dispersion models can be used for several purposes by regulatory bodies and industry. Some of these purposes are summarized below: Predict the dispersion of industrial air emissions and the resulting pollutant concentrations in areas surrounding an industrial source(s); Identify the areas of high pollutant concentration; Determine pollutant concentrations in sensitive areas surrounding an industrial source; Determine the environmental exposure to the pollutants; Government is able to assess ambient air quality compliance by industry using air dispersion modeling; Industry can use air dispersion models to predict the potential impact of modified stack configurations on air dispersion patterns and concentrations; Industry can use air dispersion models to predict the potential impact of new fuels on air dispersion patterns and concentrations; Allow industry to determine the maximum amounts of contaminants (emission rates) that they can release into the environment and still remain in compliance with ambient air quality standards; and And more importantly, assess ways to reduce overall emission rates in a cost effective manner. CONCLUSIONS Air dispersion modeling is a useful tool for assessing the environmental impact of an industrial source on surrounding areas. While there are several air dispersion models available, the CALPUFF model accounts for the influence that large water bodies have on atmospheric pollutant dispersion, accounts for plume rise and flow around building obstacles, and is suitable for use in areas with complex terrain. The study area has rough terrain and the terrain s influence on pollutant dispersion was evident in the widely spaced isopleths in the southwest direction, demonstrating high dispersion, and the closely spaced isopleths in the northeast direction, demonstrating low dispersion. In the northeast direction, the steep 6
7 terrain is acting as a barrier to pollutant dispersion causing the reflection of the pollutant plume and the pollutant accumulation in the area between the source and the steep slope. Stack height and exit velocity are among the main dispersion controlling parameters. Exit temperature does not have as great an effect on pollutant dispersion as stack height and exit velocity. An increase in the stack height enhances effective plume rise and promotes buoyancy induced dispersion, resulting in a decrease in the maximum pollutant concentration. An increase in exit velocity decreases the maximum pollutant concentration as an increased plume momentum leads to a higher mixing and turbulent dispersion. It is evident in this study that an increase in exit temperature does not have a significant effect on concentrations near the source, but does tend to result in a decrease in pollutant concentrations at a distance from the source. This is due to the thermal buoyancy effect whose effect appears at a distance from the source. Air dispersion models, such as CALPUFF, can be used for several purposes by regulatory bodies and industry by relating the emission rates, exit stack characteristics, and site specific conditions to the corresponding pollutant concentrations in areas surrounding the source. This study demonstrates how industry can use air dispersion models to predict the potential impact of modified stack configurations on air dispersion patterns and concentrations in areas where the maximum concentrations will impact sensitive receptors. 7
8 Table 1 Default CALMET land use categories and associated geophysical parameters used in the present study (Earth Tech 2003). Land Use Type Description Surface Roughness (m) Albedo Bowen Ration Soil Heat Flux Parameter Anthropogenic Heat Flux (W/m 2 ) Leaf Area Index 10 Urban or Built-Up Land 20 Agricultural Land - Unirrigated -20 Agricultural Land - Irrigated Rangeland Forest Land Small Water Body Bays and Estuaries Large Water Body Wetland Forested Wetland Nonforested Wetland Barren Land Tundra Perennial Snow or Ice Note: Negative values indicate irrigated land use. 8
9 Table 2 Emission stack data for the four model runs. Model Run Stack Height (m) Base Elevation (m) Stack Diameter (m) Exit Velocity (m/s) Exit Temp. (K) SO 2 Emission Rate (g/s) TSP Emission Rate (g/s) Run 1 (base case) Run Run Run Table 3 Maximum 8-hour average concentrations of SO 2 and TSP for each model run. Model Run SO 2 TSP Run Run Run Run Table 4 The maximum 8-hour average concentrations of SO 2 and TSP at the discrete receptors for each model run. Discrete Receptor Number SO 2 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 TSP SO 2 TSP SO 2 TSP SO 2 TSP
10 REFERENCES CITED Earth Tech, CALPUFF Modeling System. Earth Tech: Official CALPUFF Web Site. Available online at: (Accessed on May 2, 2004). Environment Canada, Climate Data Online. Available online at: (Accessed on May 2, 2004). Fisher, A. L., M. C. Parsons, S. E. Roberts, P. J. Shea, F. I. Khan, and T. Husain, Long-term SO2 Dispersion Modeling Over a Coastal Region. Environmental Technology, Volume 24, pp Lakes Environmental, AERMOD Tech Guide. Available online at: (Accessed on May 14, 2004). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), A comparison of CALPUFF with ISC3. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), User guide for the industrial source complex (ISC3) dispersion models. USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 10
11 Fracflow Consultants Inc.
12 Figure X-Direction(km) Maximum eight-hour average ground-level SO2 concentrations predictedby the CALPUFFairdispersion model for the industrial source and surrounding area (concentrations in grams per cubic metres.1g=1,000,000 micrograms). Map grid is orientednorth-south and East-West.
13 Figure X-Direction (km) Maximum eight-hour average ground-level TSP concentrations predicted by the CALPUFFairdispersion model for the industrial source and surrounding area(concentrations in grams per cubic metres.1g=1,000,000 micrograms). Map grid is oriented North-South and East-West.
Comparison of Two Dispersion Models: A Bulk Petroleum Storage Terminal Case Study
Comparison of Two Dispersion Models: A Bulk Petroleum Storage Terminal Case Study Prepared By: Anthony J. Schroeder BREEZE SOFTWARE 12770 Merit Drive Suite 900 Dallas, TX 75251 +1 (972) 661-8881 breeze-software.com
More informationSensitivity of AERMOD to Meteorological Data Sets Based on Varying Surface Roughness. Paper No A-168-AWMA
Sensitivity of AERMOD to Meteorological Data Sets Based on Varying Surface Roughness Paper No. 2009-A-168-AWMA Prepared by: Anthony J. Schroeder, CCM Senior Consultant George J. Schewe, CCM, QEP Principal
More informationModeling 101: Intro to Dispersion Modeling Programs and Process
1 Modeling 101: Intro to Dispersion Modeling Programs and Process Carolinas Air Pollution Control Association Presentation by: Pilar Johansson Trinity Consultants 2 Presentation Outline When are Models
More informationComparative Use of ISCST3, ISC-PRIME and AERMOD in Air Toxics Risk Assessment
Comparative Use of ISCST3, ISC-PRIME and AERMOD in Air Toxics Risk Assessment KHANH T. TRAN Applied Modeling Inc., 21395 Castillo Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Telephone (818) 716-5347, E-mail: kttran@amiace.com,
More informationComparison of Features and Data Requirements among the CALPUFF, AERMOD, and ADMS Models
Comparison of Features and Data Requirements among the CALPUFF, AERMOD, and ADMS Models Prepared By: Russell F. Lee BREEZE SOFTWARE 12700 Park Central Drive Suite 2100 Dallas, TX 75251 +1 (972) 661-8881
More informationSignificance of a CALPUFF Near-Field Analysis
Significance of a CALPUFF Near-Field Analysis Paper #70052 Authors: Elizabeth A. H. Carper Trinity Consultants 20819 72 nd Avenue South, Suite 610 Kent, WA 98032 Eri Ottersburg Trinity Consultants 20819
More informationSensitivity of the AERMOD air quality model to the selection of land use parameters
Sensitivity of the AERMOD air quality model to the selection of land use paras Thomas G. Grosch Trinity Consultants, 79 T.W. Alexander Dr., Building 4201, Suite 207, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; tgrosch@trinityconsultants.com
More informationAPPENDIX E SATURN (UNITS 1 & 2) AIR TDR
APPENDIX E SATURN (UNITS 1 & 2) AIR TDR Technical Data Report for Saturn Compressor Station (Units 1&2) Air Quality Prepared for: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Calgary, Alberta Prepared by: Stantec Consulting
More informationREPORT. Offshore Ironsands Project. Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Reciprocating Engines
REPORT Offshore Ironsands Project Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Reciprocating Engines Prepared for Prepared by Date Job Number 29303.v2 Distribution: (FILE) 1 copy 1 copy Table of contents 1 Introduction
More information75th Air Base Wing. Comparison of CALPUFF and OBODM for Open Burn/Open Detonation Modeling. 22 May Mark Bennett, Ph.D.
75th Air Base Wing Comparison of CALPUFF and OBODM for Open Burn/Open Detonation Modeling 22 May 2007 Mark Bennett, Ph.D. CH2M Hill, Inc Joint Services Environmental Management Conference and Exposition
More informationAir pollution modeling of the industrial complexes and cities in the Kurdistan region using AERMOD view
First International Symposium on Urban Development: Koya as a Case Study 333 Air pollution modeling of the industrial complexes and cities in the Kurdistan region using AERMOD view H. Moradi 1,2, M. Rouhi
More informationLINN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
LINN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT Air Quality Division M E M O R A N D U M DATE: MARCH 13, 2009 TO: FROM: RE: CC: TONY DAUGHERTY PM2.5 PREDICTED MODELING IMPACTS OF OUTDOOR WOOD BOILERS INTRODUCTION
More informationREPORT. Offshore Ironsands Project. Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Gas Turbines
REPORT Offshore Ironsands Project Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Gas Turbines Prepared for Prepared by Date Job Number 29303.v2 Distribution: (FILE) 1 copy 1 copy Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 2
More informationMULTIPLE POINT SOURCE DISPERSION ANALYSIS OF CO, NO 2, PM 10 AND SO 2 FROM PAITON POWER PLANT USING CALPUFF
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2018, pp. 837 846, Article ID: IJCIET_09_01_081 Available online at http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=9&itype=1
More informationAIR AND ODOUR EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL SHUTDOWN STACK RELEASE
AIR AND ODOUR EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL SHUTDOWN STACK RELEASE CLEAN HARBORS CANADA INC. CORUNNA, ONTARIO DISCLAIMER: SOME FORMATTING CHANGES MAY HAVE OCCURRED WHEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WAS
More informationAttachment 2. Modeling Protocol for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Belews Creek Steam Station
Attachment 2 Modeling Protocol for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Belews Creek Steam Station Duke Energy Belews Creek Generating Station Modeling Protocol For 1-hour SO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
More informationSO 2 Air Dispersion Modeling Report for White Bluff Steam Electric Station. ERM Project No The world s leading sustainability consultancy
SO 2 Air Dispersion Modeling Report for White Bluff Steam Electric Station August 2015 ERM Project No. 0268066 www.erm.com The world s leading sustainability consultancy SO 2 Air Dispersion Modeling Report
More informationGuidance Document. Plume Dispersion Modelling GD-PPD Guideline for Plume Dispersion Modelling
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Environment & Conservation Pollution Prevention Division (Environment) Guidance Document Title: Guideline for Plume Dispersion Modelling Prepared By:
More informationAPPENDIX H AIR DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. (REF. CHAPTER 11 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATIC FACTORS)
101050.22.RP.0001 A Environmental Impact Statement 15 th April 2005 APPENDIX H AIR DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. (REF. CHAPTER 11 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATIC FACTORS) S:\Projects\190900\101050
More informationAIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN CAPE
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN CAPE MODEL PLAN OF STUDY To: From: Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation Sasko Building 90 Long Street Kimberley, 8300 umoya-nilu
More informationAtmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Odour Impact: Practices, Issues & Recommendations
Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Odour Impact: Practices, Issues & Recommendations Chris Scullion, Managing Consultant September 14-15, 2015 Toronto, ON trinityconsultants.com Odour Dispersion Modelling
More informationReview of the 2009 Gauteng Air Quality Management Plan
Review of the 2009 Gauteng Air Quality Management Plan GT/GDARD/154/2016 DISPERSION MODELLING PLAN OF STUDY To: From: Gauteng Provincial Treasury Imbumba House 75 Fox Street Marshalltown, Johannesburg
More information1 Introduction What is Dispersion Modelling What can dispersion modelling be used for? What can t dispersion models do?...
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 What is Dispersion Modelling... 4 1.2 What can dispersion modelling be used for?... 4 1.3 What can t dispersion models do?... 5 2 Why is dispersion modelling required?
More informationAir Quality Assessment Of the Grizzly Oil Sands ULC Algar Lake SAGD Project
Air Quality Assessment Of the Prepared for: Prepared by: Millennium EMS Solutions Ltd. January 21 File #7-99 Suite 28 427 98 Street Edmonton AB Canada T6E 5R7 Tel: 78.496.948 Fax: 78.496.949 Email: info@mems.ca
More informationImpact of gaseous and particulate matter emission for fluid catalytic cracking units
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Impact of gaseous and particulate matter emission for fluid catalytic cracking units This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional
More informationAPPENDIX I Air Quality Technical Data Report. PDF Page 1 of 117
APPENDIX I Air Quality Technical Data Report PDF Page 1 of 117 PDF Page 2 of 117 Air Quality Technical Data Report Prepared for: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Calgary, Alberta Prepared by: Stantec Consulting
More informationKitimat Airshed Emissions Effects Assessment and CALPUFF Modelling
Kitimat Airshed Emissions Effects Assessment and CALPUFF Modelling EMA of BC - May 2016 Session - Regional Air Topics Anna Henolson Topics to Cover What is Air Dispersion Modelling? Types of Models CALPUFF
More informationIs AERSCREEN Always Greater Than AERMOD
Is AERSCREEN Always Greater Than AERMOD George J. Schewe, CCM, QEP 11 th Modeling Conference Research Triangle Park, NC August 12, 2015 Background Current Appendix W Section 2.2 states: The purpose of
More informationDISPERSION MODEL PREDICTIONS OF NO X EMISSIONS: CASE STUDY FROM KOCAELI, TURKEY
DISPERSION MODEL PREDICTIONS OF NO X EMISSIONS: CASE STUDY FROM KOCAELI, TURKEY Şenay Çetin Doğruparmak*, Aykan Karademir, Savaş Ayberk Department of Environmental Engineering, Kocaeli University, 4138
More informationApplication of the AERMOD modeling system for air pollution dispersion in the South Pars oilfield
First International Symposium on Urban Development: Koya as a Case Study 339 Application of the AERMOD modeling system for air pollution dispersion in the South Pars oilfield 1,2 1,2 3 M. Rouhi, H. Moradi
More informationEnergy Impact Analysis in Support of Class I Redesignation Requests. Prepared for. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Cloquet, Minnesota
Energy Impact Analysis in Support of Class I Redesignation Requests Prepared for Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Cloquet, Minnesota Prepared by August 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0
More informationKey-Words: - Dispersion models, Meteorological models, Industrial source, CALPUFF, RAMS, PM 10, SO x, NO x.
An application of the RAMS-CALMET-CALPUFF modelling system to assess the long-term contribution to atmospheric pollution from a large industrial source in Tuscany F. CALASTRINI, C. BUSILLO, G. GUALTIERI
More information2nd International Conference on WASTE MANAGEMENT, WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR CLIMATE (WWAI'08) Corfu, Greece, October 26-28, 2008
An application of the RAMS-CALMET-CALPUFF modelling system to assess the long-term contribution to atmospheric pollution from a large industrial source in Tuscany F. CALASTRINI, C. BUSILLO, G. GUALTIERI
More informationAssessing the air quality, toxic and health impacts of the Lamu coal-fired power plants
Assessing the air quality, toxic and health impacts of the Lamu coal-fired power plants Lauri Myllyvirta 1 & Clifford Chuwah 2 Greenpeace Research Laboratories 3 Technical Report 06-2017 June 2017 Summary
More informationAERMOD Modeling of PM2.5 Impacts of the Proposed Highwood Generating Station
AERMOD Modeling of PM2.5 Impacts of the Proposed Highwood Generating Station September 10, 2007 Prepared for Montana Environmental Information Center and Citizens for Clean Energy Prepared by Khanh T.
More informationAnnual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality. Volume 1 Addendum 2
2016-2017 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality Volume 1 Addendum 2 December 28, 2016 North Carolina Division of Air Quality A Division of the North Carolina Department
More informationAssessing the air quality, toxic and health impacts of the Cayirhan coal-fired power plants
Assessing the air quality, toxic and health impacts of the Cayirhan coal-fired power plants Lauri Myllyvirta 1 & Clifford Chuwah 2 Greenpeace Research Laboratories 3 Technical Report 08-2017 November 2017
More informationCALPUFF AIR DISPERSION MODELLING FOR THE GIANT MINE REMEDIATION PROJECT
CALPUFF AIR DISPERSION MODELLING FOR THE GIANT MINE REMEDIATION PROJECT Prepared for: Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada Contaminants and Remediation Directorate Prepared by: SENES Consultants
More informationPerformance evaluation of CALPUFF and AERMOD dispersion models for air quality assessment of an industrial complex
Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Vol. 74, May 2015, pp. 302-307 Performance evaluation of CALPUFF and AERMOD dispersion models for air quality assessment of an industrial complex S Gulia 1,
More informationAIR DISPERSION MODELLING GUIDELINE FOR ONTARIO
July 2005 AIR DISPERSION MODELLING GUIDELINE FOR ONTARIO Version 1.0 Guidance for Demonstrating Compliance with The Air Dispersion Modelling Requirements set out in Ontario Regulation 419/05 Air Pollution
More informationMODELING METHODOLOGY
Paul Schleusener, Senior Engineer Specialist Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Constitution Hall, 1 st Floor 525 West Allegan Street P.O. Box 30473 Lansing, MI 48909 7973
More informationInfluence of building-downwash effect on urban traffic pollution
Influence of building-downwash effect on urban traffic pollution G. Latini, G. Passerini & S. Tascini Dipartimento di Energetica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy Abstract Building-downwash has
More informationEvaluation of CO and NO x Distributions from Point (Industry) Sources in Körfez District of Kocaeli Province with ISCST3 Model
Digital Proceeding Of THE ICOEST 2013 -, Cappadocia C.Ozdemir, S. Şahinkaya, E. Kalıpcı, M.K. Oden (editors) Nevsehir, Turkey, June 18 21, 2013 Evaluation of CO and NO x Distributions from Point (Industry)
More informationAppendix: Materials and methods
Appendix: Materials and methods Atmospheric dispersion modeling for the case studies was carried out using version 7 (June 2015) of the CALPUFF modeling system. CALPUFF is an advanced non-steady-state
More informationMillipore Thermal Oxidiser Emissions Dispersion Modelling Impact Assessment
Millipore Thermal Oxidiser Emissions Dispersion Modelling Impact Assessment Issue No 2 45078628 EPA Export 25-07-2013:19:52:54 Project Title: Report Title: Millipore Thermal Oxidiser Emissions Project
More informationAIR DISPERSION MODELING IN ORDER TO ASSESS IMPACT OF POWER AND INDUSTRIAL PLANTS
AIR DISPERSION MODELING IN ORDER TO ASSESS IMPACT OF POWER AND INDUSTRIAL PLANTS Kaštel Ečka, Zrenjanin, 2013. Dušan Todorović, Aleksandar Jovović, Dejan Radić, Marko Obradović, Nikola Karličić, Miroslav
More informationEVALUATION OF DISPERSION MODEL PERFORMANCE IN PREDICTING SO2 CONCENTRATIONS FROM PETROLEUM REFINERY COMPLEX
Geotec., Const. Mat. & Env., ISSN: 2186-2982(Print), 2186-2990(Online), Japan EVALUATION OF DISPERSION MODEL PERFORMANCE IN PREDICTING SO2 CONCENTRATIONS FROM PETROLEUM REFINERY COMPLEX Sarawut Thepanondh
More informationModeling For Managers. aq-ppt5-11
Modeling For Managers aq-ppt5-11 Types of Models Near-field *Preferred: EPA AERMOD model 50km CLASS II; Increment Far-field CALPUFF 50km 100+km CLASS I; Chemical Transformation What is used at MPCA History
More informationArab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications
Arab J. Nucl. Sci. Appl, Vol 51, 2, 68-81 (2018) Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications ISSN 1110-0451 Web site: ajnsa.journals.ekb.eg (ESNSA) Environmental Impact of Conventional Power Plant
More informationIntermodal Logistics Centre at Enfield Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 12 AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT
Intermodal Logistics Centre at Enfield Environmental Assessment CHAPTER 12 AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT October 2005 Contents 12. 12-1 12.1 Introduction 12-1 12.2 Factors Affecting Air Quality 12-1 12.3 Air
More informationAIR DISPERSION MODELLING GUIDELINE FOR ONTARIO [GUIDELINE A-11]
AIR DISPERSION MODELLING GUIDELINE FOR ONTARIO [GUIDELINE A-11] Version 3.0 Guidance for Demonstrating Compliance with the Air Dispersion Modelling Requirements set out in Ontario Regulation 419/05 Air
More informationMODELLING OF VARIATION IN VEHICULAR POLLUTION CONCENTRATION WITH TIME PERIOD AND SEASON
MODELLING OF VARIATION IN VEHICULAR POLLUTION CONCENTRATION WITH TIME PERIOD AND SEASON Awkash Kumar* Ph.D. Research Scholar, Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,
More informationTechnical Backgrounder on Multi-Source Air Dispersion Modelling
Technical Backgrounder on Multi-Source Air Dispersion Modelling DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY NOVEMBER, 2017 Page 1/29 Table of Contents 1 Multi-source Air Dispersion Modelling - Overview... 3 2 Selection
More informationLocalized Significance Threshold Analysis
Localized Significance Threshold Analysis ANDORA AVENUE SUBDIVISION Tentative Tract No. 53426 Subsequent EIR Localized Significance Threshold Analysis Prepared for: City of Los Angeles, Department of City
More informationKhosro Ashrafi (Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Iran)
Khosro Ashrafi (Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Iran) Khashrafi@ut.ac.ir Majid Shafiepour Motlagh (Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Iran) shafiepourm@yahoo.com Hossein Tavakkoli
More informationReview of GHD s Modeling Assessment and Analysis of the Coal-fired Power Stations in the Latrobe Valley. Dr. H. Andrew Gray Gray Sky Solutions
Review of GHD s Modeling Assessment and Analysis of the Coal-fired Power Stations in the Latrobe Valley Dr. H. Andrew Gray Gray Sky Solutions September 19, 2018 1 Introduction My name is Dr. H. Andrew
More informationPractical Implications of Applying the DRR Modeling TAD Using AERMOD
Practical Implications of Applying the DRR Modeling TAD Using AERMOD Paper #26 Presented at the Guideline on Air Quality Models: The New Path April 12-14, 2016 Chapel Hill, NC George J. Schewe 1, CCM,
More informationOdour Impact Assessment for a Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant
Odour Impact Assessment for a Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Talbotville, Township of Southwold, Ontario Prepared for: 1873828 Ontario Limited 94 Curtis Street St. Thomas, Ontario N5P 1J2 Site Name:
More informationAppendix 0 Air Dispersion Modelling Study Black Point Quarry Project Guysborough County, NS SLR Project No.:
Appendix 0 Air Dispersion Modelling Study 2015 Black Point Quarry Project Guysborough County, NS SLR Project No.: 210.05913.00000 Black Point Quarry Air Dispersion Modelling Study Prepared for: CJ Spainhour
More informationRoss Nogami Air Quality Studies Hayashi Court Richmond, B.C. V7E 5W2
Ross Nogami Air Quality Studies 12300 Hayashi Court Richmond, B.C. V7E 5W2 Mr. Casey Houweling President 2776 64 th Street Delta, B.C. V4L 2N7 Dear : Re: Predicted Ambient Air Quality from a Dispersion
More informationCombined Influence of Stack Height and Exit Velocity on Dispersion of Pollutants Caused by Helwan Cement Factory (Study using AERMOD Model)
International Journal of Coputer Applications (0975 8887) olue 2 No.9, July 205 Cobined Influence of Stack Height and Exit elocity on Dispersion of Pollutants Caused by Helwan Ceent Factory (Study using
More information5.3.1 Air Dispersion and Emission Modeling
5.3.1 Air Dispersion and Emission Modeling The models that simulate the transport and dispersion of air contaminants from the point of release to potential receptors use known data on the characteristics
More informationReview of KCBX Dispersion Modeling used to Support Their Variance Request
Memorandum To: From: Robert Saikaly and Stephen Zemba Date: Subject: Review of KCBX Dispersion Modeling used to Support Their Variance Request CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) reviewed two air dispersion modeling
More informationPrepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. 14 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1K5. Prepared by:
EMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT IN SUPPORT OF A RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL APPLICATION TORONTO HYDRO ENERGY SERVICES INC. LESLIE ST., TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy
More informationAPPENDIX III. Air Quality Modelling of NO X and PM 10 (2007) RFI Report (Dec 2007)
APPENDIX III Air Quality Modelling of NO X and PM 10 (2007) RFI Report (Dec 2007) 17 EPA Export 25-07-2013:22:32:47 Platin IPPC Licence Application Air Quality Modelling of NOx and PM (2007) EPA Export
More informationIntroduction to Air Quality Models
Introduction to Air Quality Models Emission Model Meteorological Model Temporal and spatial emission rates Topography Chemical Transformation Pollutant Transport Equilibrium between Particles and gases
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS OF TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS OF TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN NORTH CAROLINA February 2014 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Air Quality Permitting Section
More informationDispersion Modeling of SO 2 Emissions from a Lignite Fired Thermal Power Plant using CALPUFF
Energy and Environment Research; Vol. 2, No. 2; 212 ISSN 1927-69 E-ISSN 1927-77 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Dispersion ing of SO 2 Emissions from a Lignite Fired Thermal Power
More informationMMA Project Number
AIR QUALITY DISPERSION MODELING FOR HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT LA OROYA METALLURGICAL COMPLEX September 6, 2005 Prepared for Integral Consulting, Inc. Mercer Island, Washington 98040 Prepared by: McVehil-Monnett
More informationAPPENDIX D MODELING AND DEPOSITION ANALYSIS
APPENDIX D MODELING AND DEPOSITION ANALYSIS Appendix D Ambient Air Quality Dispersion and Deposition Modeling Analyses Supporting a Permit to Install Application Eagle Project Located in Michigamme Township,
More informationGuidance for Air Dispersion Modeling
Guidance for Air Dispersion Modeling San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Working Draft Prepared by Leland Villalvazo, Ester Davila, and Glenn Reed Special Thanks to Dr. Jesse Thé Of Lakes
More informationSIP Modeling Updates for Allegheny County, PA
SIP Modeling Updates for Allegheny County, PA 2017 EPA Regional/State/Local Modelers Workshop Research Triangle Park, NC Sept. 25-26, 2017 Jason Maranche Allegheny County Health Dept. (ACHD) Air Quality
More informationAERMOD Training TRAINING AERMOD. Gaussion Plume Air Dispersion Model. Index. Course Agenda. The Lakes Training Approach
AERMOD Training Gaussion Plume Air Dispersion Model AERMOD Index TRAINING Course Agenda The Lakes Training Approach Course Materials AERMOD View 2 3 4 5 www.weblakes.com Course Agenda Two Day Training
More informationAir and Dust Monitoring Summary Report
Toronto Transit Commission Air and Dust Monitoring Summary Report Monitoring Period: 1 February 28 February 2014 Air quality monitoring is currently ongoing as part of the dust control program associated
More informationA comparison of CALPUFF air quality simulation results with monitoring data for Krakow Poland
A comparison of CALPUFF air quality simulation results with monitoring data for Krakow Poland John S. Irwin 1, Joanna Niedzialek 2, Jerzy Burzynski 3 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (Mail Drop
More informationAir Quality Assessment of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry. Gregory Crooks, M.Eng., P.Eng. July 14, 2009
Air Quality Assessment of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry Gregory Crooks, M.Eng., P.Eng. July 14, 2009 Study Overview Health Canada is currently conducting a study of the effects on human health of
More informationAppendix B2. Air Dispersion Modeling
Appendix B2 Air Dispersion Modeling Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Estimation of Emissions Used in the Air Dispersion Modeling... 2 2.1 Emission Source Identification... 2 2.2 Derivation of Peak 1-Hour,
More informationFINAL. AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE McCORMICK PIT
FINAL AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE McCORMICK PIT Prepared for: Harrington McAvan Limited 6882 14 th Avenue Markham, Ontario L6B 1A8 Prepared by: SENES Consultants Limited 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12 Richmond
More informationAIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT METAL MAN GALVANIZING OPERATIONS PORT ELIZABETH FINAL REPORT JUNE 2012
AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for METAL MAN GALVANIZING OPERATIONS PORT ELIZABETH FINAL REPORT JUNE 2012 Lethabo Air Quality Specialists cc PO Box 74936 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 Page 1 of 24 AIR QUALITY
More informationEXAMPLE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS CHECKLIST a
EXAMPLE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS CHECKLIST a 1. Source location map(s) showing location with respect to:! Urban areas b! PSD Class I areas! Nonattainment areas b! Topographic features (terrain, lakes, river
More informationCritical Review of the Building Downwash Algorithms in AERMOD
Critical Review of the Building Downwash Algorithms in AERMOD Paper #34 Presented at the conference: Guideline on Air Quality Models: The New Path April 12-14, 2016 Chapel Hill, NC Ron L. Petersen, 1 Sergio
More informationChapter 3 Air Dispersion and Deposition Modeling
What s Covered in Chapter 3: Chapter 3 Air Dispersion and Deposition Modeling 3.1 Background on Air Dispersion Models for Risk Assessment 3.2 Partitioning Emissions 3.3 Site-Specific Characteristics Required
More informationDispersion Models ATM 515: Earth Systems Cory Mohn May 2, 2007
Dispersion Models ATM 515: Earth Systems Cory Mohn May 2, 2007 Dispersion models have been created for a number of uses ranging from research on pollution and air chemistry to creating information for
More informationAir Quality Modelling. Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 5 1.1 Purpose of Modeling... 5 1.2 Phases of a Modeling Study... 5 1.2.1 Scoping Phase... 6 1.2.2 Screening Model Phase... 6 1.2.3 Refined Model Phase... 6 1.2.4 Presentation
More informationChapter 3 - ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT AND MERCURY DEPOSITION
Chapter 3 - ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT AND MERCURY DEPOSITION A. Introduction Mercury is an especially dynamic pollutant because of its unique physical, chemical, and bioaccumulative properties. The volatility
More informationIJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: [765] [Dehankar, 4(1): January, 2015] ISSN:
IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY STUDY OF ACCIDENTAL RELEASES HEAVY GAS DISPERSION COMPARING SLAB MODELS AND SCREEN-3 MODEL Prof.V.A.Bhosale, Prof.K.I.Patil, Prof.P.B.Dehankar*
More informationDispersion Modeling of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants at Coshocton and Manchester, Ohio
65 Dispersion Modeling of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants at Coshocton and Manchester, Ohio Sang-Sup lee and tim c. keener 1, department of civil and environmental engineering, university
More informationPrepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. 14 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1K5. Prepared by:
EMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT GREEN LANE LANDFILL GAS COGENERATION PLANT TORONTO HYDRO ENERGY SERVICES INC. 38024 JOHN WISE LINE, TOWNSHIP OF SOUTHWOLD, ONTARIO Prepared for: Toronto
More information24 August Leanne Cross Senior Environmental Planner KDC Via
24 August 2018 Leanne Cross Senior Environmental Planner KDC Via email: Leanne@kdc.com.au RE: Air Quality Assessment Proposed Mt Piper Rail Loop Modification Dear Leanne, Todoroski Air Sciences has assessed
More informationEMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT
1 EMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT Interior Heart and Surgical Centre Project (IHSC) Kelowna General Hospital Kelowna, British Columbia Prepared for PCL Constructors Westcoast Inc. Report
More informationTechnical Guidance Document for Air Quality Modeling
Technical Guidance Document for Air Quality Modeling EAD-EQ-PCE-TG-12 Signature on Original Environment Quality Sector * Corporate Management Representative Secretary General Originated By Reviewed By
More informationAnalysis of SO 2 Modeling Issues for Ameren Power Plants in the Greater St. Louis Area
Analysis of SO 2 Modeling Issues for Ameren Power Plants in the Greater St. Louis Area Prepared by AECOM August 19, 2014 1. Introduction In 2010, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
More informationDispersion Modeling of NO x and SO x in Phase 9 and 10 of South Pars Oilfield
Dispersion Modeling of NO x and SO x in Phase 9 and 10 of South Pars Oilfield Maryam Rouhi 1, Hossein Moradi 2, Alireza Soffianian 3, Alireza Dahaghin 4 1 Master student of Environmental Sciences E-mail:
More informationAnnual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality. Volume 1 Addendum
2016-2017 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality Volume 1 Addendum September 1, 2016 North Carolina Division of Air Quality A Division of the North Carolina Department
More informationAir Pollution- Challenges in Compliance
Air Pollution- Challenges in Compliance Air pollution The introduction of chemicals, particulate matter, or biological materials that cause harm or discomfort to humans or other living organisms, or cause
More informationPaper No: o7130 Case Study: Odour Risk Management at the WTP, One of Australia s Largest & Most Unique WWTPs
Paper No: o7130 Case Study: Odour Risk Management at the WTP, One of Australia s Largest & Most Unique WWTPs Josef Cesca, CH2M HILL Australia Pty Limited, jcesca@ch2mhill.com.au Amy Flanagan, CH2M HILL
More informationAIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF SABALAN GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT PROJECT, NW IRAN
PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Third Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, January 28-30, 2008 SGP-TR-185 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF SABALAN GEOTHERMAL POWER
More informationPrepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. 14 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1K5. Prepared by:
EMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT IN SUPPORT OF A RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL APPLICATION TORONTO HYDRO ENERGY SERVICES INC. LESLIE ST., TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy
More informationImproved Building Dimension Inputs for AERMOD Modeling of the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station
Improved Building Dimension Inputs for AERMOD Modeling of the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station Paper # 276 Ronald Petersen and Jeff Reifschneider CPP, Inc., 1415 Blue Spruce Drive, Fort Collins,
More informationAir Quality Assessment For Development Options At Olkaria Geothermal Field In Kenya
Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015 Air Quality Assessment For Development Options At Olkaria Geothermal Field In Kenya Cornelius J. Ndetei Kenya Electricity
More information