Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS"

Transcription

1 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Section 14. Noise Introduction This section analyzes the potential noise impacts of the Proposed Project. Projectgenerated noise sources include mobile sources from increased vehicles accessing the site, and stationary sources such as ventilation equipment and operating equipment. Environmental noise is defined as the sound in a community emanating from man-made sources such as automobiles, trucks, buses, aircraft, trains, and fixed industrial sources, or from natural sources such as animals and wind. Sound levels are measured in logarithmic units called decibels ( db ). An overall measurement of sound results in a single decibel value that describes the sound environment, taking all frequencies (pitches) into account. The human ear, however, does not sense all frequencies in the same manner. The A -weighted scale (expressed in dba units) was developed to closely approximate the human sensory response from highway-related noise. The ability of an average individual to perceive changes in noise levels is well documented. Generally, an increase of less than 3.0 dba is barely perceptible to most listeners, a 5.0 dba increase is readily noticeable, and a 10.0 dba increase normally is perceived as a doubling of noise. A list of typical community sound levels is shown in Table Table Noise Levels of Common Sources Sound Source Sound Pressure Level (dba) Air Raid Siren at 50 feet 120 Maximum Levels at Rock Concerts (Rear Seats) 110 On Platform by Passing Subway Train 100 On Sidewalk by Passing Heavy Truck or Bus 90 On Sidewalk by Typical Highway 80 On Sidewalk by Passing Automobiles with Mufflers 70 Typical Urban Area Typical Suburban Area Quiet Suburban Area at Night Typical Rural Area at Night Isolated Broadcast Studio 20 Audiometric (Hearing Testing) Booth 10 Threshold of Hearing 0 Source: CEQR Technical Manual, 2001 Cowan, James P., Handbook of Environmental Acoustics, 1994 and Egan, M. David, Architectural Acoustics, Since an instantaneous noise measurement (measured in dba) describes noise levels at just one moment of time, and since very few noises in a community area are constant, other descriptors are used to represent varying sound levels over extended periods of time. The equivalent noise level (L eq ) represents the time-varying noise level produced over a period of time, as a single number over a specified period of time. This represents the equivalent steady noise level, which, over a given period, contains the same energy as the time-varying noise during the same period. The most common time period is the noise over one hour, represented as L eq (h). This descriptor is commonly used to express results from noise measurements, predictions and

2 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-2 impact assessments. Other descriptors often used in noise analyses are L 10 and L dn. L 10 is defined as the sound pressure level exceeded 10 percent of the time and is often used to describe noise generated from traffic sources. It is also used as a noise descriptor for the CEQR Noise Exposure Guidelines described below. L dn is the day-night equivalent sound level, defined as a 24-hour continuous L eq with a 10.0 db adjustment added to all hourly noise levels recorded between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. L dn is often used in the analysis of both aircraft and train noise. CEQR Technical Manual guidance suggests that the duration of noise measurements should be sufficient to ensure that noise measurements are reflective of ambient conditions and to determine that the duration of the measurement period is sufficiently long to encompass typical events and conditions. According to Section of the CEQR Technical Manual, noise measurements should be made in accordance with the expected times that the proposed activity at the Project Site would be greatest, typically during the peak weekday traffic hours. 179 The Proposed Project, as a courthouse facility, would function similar to an office use with the majority of activity on the Project Site occurring during business hours. Since the Proposed Project would be expected to generate the most noise during the peak hours, and minimal projectrelated noise would occur during the nighttime, measurements were taken during the peak a.m., midday, and p.m. hours, and the analysis was performed for these hours. For the purposes of this analysis, the 1-hour L eq will be used to describe traffic and stationary source noise impacts, and the L 10 descriptor will be used to compare the project to the CEQR Noise Exposure Guidelines as described in Sections and 420 of the CEQR Technical Manual. 180 Noise Standards and Criteria CEQR Noise Impact Thresholds The New York City Department of Environmental Protection ( NYCDEP ) has established standards for noise exposure at sensitive receptors resulting from the implementation of a project. 181 The impact thresholds are described below: An increase of 5.0 dba or greater over the No-Build noise level would be an impact if the No-Build noise level is 60.0 dba or less. If the No-Build noise level is 61.0 dba, a 4.0 dba increase or greater would be considered significant. If the No-Build noise level is 62.0 dba or more, a 3.0 dba increase or greater would be considered significant. A significant impact would occur during the nighttime period (defined by CEQR standards as being between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.) if there is a change in noise levels of 3.0 dba or more. CEQR Noise Exposure Standards The NYCDEP has also promulgated standards that apply to a Proposed Project if it is also a sensitive receptor such as a residence, hospital, or school, or office. 182 The NYCDEP has established four categories of acceptability based on receptor type and land use for vehicular 179 CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R CEQR Technical Manual, pp. 3R-3-3R CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R CEQR Technical Manual, Table 3R-3, p. 3R-19.

3 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-3 traffic, rail, and aircraft related noise sources. The categories include generally acceptable, marginally acceptable, marginally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable. These guidelines are shown in Table Table Noise Exposure Guidelines for use in City Environmental Impact Review 1 Receptor type 1. Outdoor area requiring serenity and quiet 2 2. Hospital, Nursing Home 3. Residence, residential hotel or motel 4. School, museum, library, court, house of worship, transient hotel or motel, public meeting room, auditorium, out-patient health facility 5. Commercial or office Time period Acceptable General External Exposure L dba Airport Exposure 3 Marginally Acceptable General External Exposure Airport Exposure 3 Marginally Unacceptable General External Exposure Airport Exposure 3 Clearly Unacceptable General External Exposure L dba 55.0 < L dba 65.0 < L dba L 10 > 80.0 dba 7a.m. L 10 p.m dba 65.0 < L dba 70.0 < L dba L 10 > 80.0 dba 10 p.m. L 7 a.m dba 55.0 < L dba 70.0 < L dba L 10 > 80.0 dba L dn 60.0 dba < L dn 65.0 dba Day (7:00 a.m. -- (I) 65.0 < L dn 70.0 dba, (II) 70.0 dba L dn Industrial, public areas only 4 Note 4 Note 4 Note 4 Note 4 Note 4 Notes: (I) In addition, any new activity shall not increase the ambient noise level by 3.0 dba or more: 1. Measurements and projections of noise exposures are to be made at appropriate heights above site boundaries as given by ANSI Standards; all values are for the worst hour in the time period. 2. Tracts of land where serenity and quiet are extraordinarily important and serve an important public need and where the preservation of these qualities is essential of the area to serve its intended purpose. Such areas could include amphitheaters, particular parks or portions of parks or open spaces dedicated or recognized by appropriate local officials for activities requiring special qualities of serenity and quiet. Examples are grounds for ambulatory hospital patients and patients and residents of sanitariums and old-age homes. 3. One may use FAA-approved Land contours supplied by the Port Authority, or the noise contours may be computed from the federally approved INM Computer Model using flight data supplied by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 4. External Noise Exposure standards for industrial areas of sounds produced by industrial operations other than operating motor vehicles or other transportation facilities are spelled out in the New York City Zoning Resolution, Sections and The referenced standards apply to M1, M2, and M3 manufacturing districts and to adjoining residence districts (performance standards are octave band standards). Source: New York City Department of Environmental Protection (adopted by NYCDEP for use in CEQR-1983) Since this project is a courthouse, the new facility would be classified as a sensitive receptor, and requires analysis of the Noise Exposure. New York City Noise Code The New York City Noise Code establishes ambient noise quality zone ( ANQZ ) criteria and standards based on existing zoning designations (Refer to Table 14-3). 183 The Airport Exposure L dn 75.0 dba

4 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-4 Proposed Project is located in an area zoned as a C4-2 General Commercial District. Commercial zones are designated as noise quality zone N-3 in the New York City Noise Ordinance. These standards apply to noise emitted directly from stationary activities due to regular use within the boundaries of a project. The standards do not apply to noise occurring off the site, such as traffic noise and aircraft noise, and also do not apply to construction noise. Refer to Section 19, Construction Impacts for applicable standards related to construction noise. Table New York City Noise Code Standards for Use and Noise Daytime standards (7:00 a.m. - Ambient Noise Quality Zone Noise quality zone N-1 (Low density residential RL; landuse zones R-1 to R-3) Noise quality zone N-2 (High density residential RH; land-use zones R-4 to R-10) Noise quality zone N-3 (All Commercial and manufacturing land-use zones) L eq =60.0 db(a) measured for any one hour L eq =65.0 db(a) measured for any one hour L eq =70.0 db(a) measured for any one hour Source: New York City Department of Environmental Protection Noise Code, revised July1, Existing Conditions Nighttime standards (10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.) L eq =50.0 db(a) measured for any one hour L eq =55.0 db(a) measured for any one hour L eq =70.0 db(a) measured for any one hour The area surrounding the Project Site is predominantly characterized by mixed commercial and residential land uses with public facilities near the north end of the site. Land uses adjacent to the roadways anticipated to be used to access the new garage include multifamily residential, mixed residential/commercial, commercial, parking, and public facilities and institutions. Noise sensitive resources in the vicinity of the Project Site include residences on St. Marks Place, Central Avenue, Slosson Terrace, Bay Street, and Victory Boulevard, and the St. George Library on Central Avenue. These resources are represented by the four noise analysis locations shown on Figure The locations include: Site 1, St. Marks Place Residences; Site 2, St. George Library Center and North of Garage Entrance; Site 3, South of Garage Entrance; Site 4, Slosson Terrace Residences. These noise analysis locations were chosen to represent the areas containing sensitive resources anticipated to have the greatest percentage increase in traffic volumes, and thus the greatest increase in sound levels New York City Department of Environmental Protection, New York City Noise Code. Revised July 1,

5 Fort Hill Circle Hudson County Richmond County New York City Boundary 1. St. Marks Place Residences 2. St. George Library Center / Slosson Terrace Residences Richmond St. Marks Place Terrace Westervelt Avenue Webster Avenue Jersey Street York Avenue Ely Street Jersey Street Stanley Avenue Castleton Avenue Victory Boulevard Cleveland Street Beechwood Avenue Cebra Avenue Egmont Place Layton Avenue Taft Avenue Hendricks Avenue Bismark Avenue Curtis Place Crescent Avenue Benzinger Avenue Winter Avenue Scribner Avenue Corson Avenue Brook Street Hamilton Avenue Westervelt Avenue Sherman Avenue Ward Avenue Vine Street Fort Place Low Terrace Nixon Avenue Belmont Place Academy Pl. Monroe Avenue Victory Boulevard Tompkins Circle Wall Street Montgomery Avenue St. Pauls Street 1 Hyatt Street St. Marks Place Stuyvesant Place Richmond Terrace Central Avenue Van Duzer Street Hannah Street Swan Street Grant Street Clinton Street Brewster Street 2 3 Bay Street 4 Borough Place Slosson Terr. Van Duzer Street Bay Street Project Site Interim Construction-Period Parking Borough Boundary Area Lots Miles Source: NYC Department of City Planning; Field Inspection Primary Study Area Secondary Study Area Noise Analysis Locations Figure 14-1: Noise Analysis Locations Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project

6 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-6 Data Collection To assess existing sound levels, noise monitoring was performed during the traffic peak periods in the a.m., midday, and p.m. Following procedures outlined in the CEQR Technical Manual, a 20-minute measurement, representative of a 1-hour L eq, was taken at street level. 184 A Bruel & Kjaer Type 2236 Precision Integration Sound Level meter was used to measure existing sound levels. This meter is microprocessor-based and measures noise levels in accordance with all current noise exposure criteria. During the noise-monitoring period the meter was tripod-mounted and equipped with a windscreen to eliminate noise associated with wind blowing across the microphone. The sound meter was calibrated with an acoustical calibrator before and after each measurement. Weather conditions on the days of monitoring were noted. The recommended meteorological conditions for noise monitoring are: Wind speed under 12.0 miles per hour ( mph ); Relative humidity under 90 percent; Temperature above 14 o Fahrenheit ( F ) and below 122 o F. The weather conditions during noise monitoring fell within these parameters. Traffic and classification counts were conducted concurrently with the noise monitoring. Traffic and classification counts are used to calculate the maximum hourly Passenger Car Equivalents ( PCEs ). Passenger Car Equivalents are used to account for the different types of motor vehicles (i.e., cars, trucks etc.) and their varying levels of sound. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, the relationships used for calculating PCEs are as follows: 1 automobile is equivalent to 1 PCE; 1 medium truck is equivalent to 13 PCEs; 1 bus is equivalent to 18 PCEs; and 1 heavy truck is equivalent to 47 PCEs. In other words, the noise level produced by a medium truck would be the same as that from 13 cars and, the noise level from a heavy truck would be equivalent to that of 47 cars. The results of the noise monitoring program are shown in Table Table Noise Monitoring Data Site Location Time PCEs L eq (dba) L 10 (dba) A.M St. Marks Place Residences 2 3 Midday P.M A.M Midday St. George Library Center and North of Garage Entrance P.M South of Garage Entrance 4 Slosson Terrace Residences Source: Jacobs Edwards and Kelcey, 2007 A.M Midday P.M A.M Midday P.M CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R-12-3R-13.

7 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-7 The Noise Exposure Guidelines recommended by the New York City Department of Environmental Protection ( NYCDEP ) and identified in Table 12-2, are expressed in terms of L 10 for vehicular noise. 185 In order to apply these guidelines, identified in Table 12-2, L eq noise levels were converted to L 10 by adding an adjustment factor of 3.0 dba to L eq per FHWA suggested guidance. 186 Noise exposure levels at the St. Marks Place residences and Central Avenue residences south of the garage entrance are in the marginally acceptable range. The St. George Library Center and Central Avenue residences located north of the garage entrance are at an acceptable level for noise during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and at a marginally acceptable level during the midday peak period. Noise exposure levels at the Slosson Terrace residences fluctuate from marginally acceptable during the a.m. peak hour to acceptable during the midday and p.m. peak periods (refer to Table 14-2 for noise exposure guidelines). No-Build Condition Under the No-Build Condition, the Proposed Project would not occur and the day-to-day operations at the Project Site would remain unchanged. An increase in background traffic would influence future noise levels in the area without the Proposed Project. No new stationary sources of noise would be introduced to the Project Site under the No-Build Condition. Noise levels for the No-Build Condition, calculated based on CEQR Technical Manual methodologies, and presented below in Table Under the No-Build Condition, noise exposure levels would remain similar to the existing condition with all noise sensitive resources in the marginally acceptable range with some levels in the acceptable range during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. Build Condition Mobile Source Impact Analysis The noise impact assessment for the Proposed Project was performed in accordance with the CEQR Technical Manual guidelines to identify whether the potential exists for the Proposed Project to generate a significant noise impact at a receptor, or be significantly affected by high ambient sound levels. 187 For vehicular noise, if the PCE values are at least doubled (i.e., a 100 percent increase) between the No-Build and Build conditions along any affected roadway link, then a detailed noise analysis must be performed. A doubling of PCEs would increase sound levels by 3.0 dba. Consequently, if a doubling of PCEs does not occur, there would be no potential for significant adverse impacts, and further analysis would not be required. 185 CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User s Guide Final Report. January p (February 11, 2008). 187 CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R-18.

8 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-8 The traffic anticipated to pass each receptor was calculated for the Existing, No-Build, and Build Conditions to determine the expected increase in PCE values (Refer to Table 14-5). The associated sound levels predicted for each time period at each site are shown in Table Changes to the sound level are calculated using the following equation: Change in level (dba) = 10 log (PCE2/PCE1) where PCE 1 = the PCE total counted during noise monitoring, and, PCE2 = the PCEs calculated for the Existing, No-Build, or Build conditions (as shown in Table 14-5). This increase (or decrease) is then added to the sound level obtained during monitoring to estimate the Existing, No-Build, and Build sound levels associated with the respective traffic numbers described in Section 11, Traffic and Parking. Site Location Time 1 St. Marks Place Residences 2 3 Table Predicted Peak-Hour PCEs Existing PCEs No-Build PCEs Build PCEs Percentage (%) Increase Between No- Build and Build A.M % Midday % P.M % A.M % Midday % St. George Library and North of Garage Entrance P.M % South of Garage Entrance A.M % Midday % P.M % A.M % Midday % 4 Slosson Terrace Residences P.M % Source: Jacobs Edwards and Kelcey, 2007 Table Predicted Peak-Hour Sound Levels (L eq, dba) Site Location Time Existing Sound Level No-Build Sound Level Build Sound Level 1 St. Marks Place Residences 2 3 Increase Between No- Build and Build A.M Midday P.M A.M Midday St. George Library and North of Garage Entrance P.M South of Garage Entrance A.M Midday P.M A.M Midday Slosson Terrace Residences P.M Source: Jacobs Edwards and Kelcey, 2007

9 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-9 The percentage increases in PCEs ranges from 0 to 45 percent, with the greatest increase occurring during the p.m. peak hour at the Slosson Terrace residences, with an increase of 45 percent. The Build Condition sound levels range between 60.8 and 65.4 dba, with increases of 0 to 1.8 dba. The highest sound levels of 64.8 to 65.4 dba occur at Central Avenue south of the garage entrance during all peak periods, and at Slosson Terrace during the a.m. and midday peak periods. The greatest increase, 1.8 dba, occurs during the p.m. peak period at Slosson Terrace. Since the greatest increase in PCEs would be less than the 100 percent increase threshold and the increase in sound levels would be less than 3.0 dba, the proposed courthouse would not have the potential for a significant noise impact. 188 Therefore, further detailed noise analyses are not required and no significant adverse mobile source noise impacts are expected as a result of the Proposed Project. Sound levels under the Build Condition would fall within the marginally acceptable category with acceptable sound exposure levels at the St. George Library and Central Avenue residences north of the garage entrance during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The parking garage is anticipated to cause minimal increases in sound levels over the existing use as surface parking. The monitored sound levels range from 59.9 to The increase in vehicle movements on site would be approximately 35 percent, increasing this lowest monitored sound level to 61.2 dba and the highest monitored sound level to This increase of 1.3 dba would be less than the 3.0 dba impact criteria for the highest-monitored sound level and less than the 5.0 dba impact criteria for the lowest monitored sound level. Additionally, the sound levels of 61.2 and 65.8 would be less than the New York City Noise Code standard of 70 dba. No significant mobile source noise impacts are expected from the proposed parking garage. Stationary Source Impact Analysis The lowest existing daytime sound levels of residences near the proposed courthouse is 59.9 dba. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, at this sound level an increase of 5.0 dba or more, to 64.9 dba would be considered a significant impact. Under the New York City Noise Code, the average hourly noise level emanating from the Project Site cannot exceed 70.0 dba (Leq). To satisfy both of these standards, sound levels emanating from the Project Site should not exceed 64.9 dba. Stationary source noise sources associated with the courthouse would include heating, ventilation and air conditioning ( HVAC ) equipment on the roof of the 5-story building. A quantitative analysis of HVAC equipment was not performed because detailed manufacturing specifications for this equipment would not become available until construction documents are finalized. However, the HVAC equipment would be positioned to minimize sound levels at the neighboring residences and ensure New York City Noise Code compliance. Therefore, no significant stationary source noise impacts are expected from the proposed courthouse. 188 CEQR Technical Manual, p. 3R-8.

10 Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page Noise Exposure To assess the impact to the proposed courthouse from the neighboring noise sources, the sound levels are compared to the Noise Exposure Guidelines described in Table 14-2 above. These guidelines analyze sound levels using the L 10 descriptor. The existing daytime sound levels near the Project Site range between 62.5 and 66.8 dba (L 10 ). These sound levels fall within the marginally acceptable range of 65.0 to 70.0 dba (L 10 ) for General External Exposure. These sound levels are made up of noise from existing noise sources including vehicular traffic, pedestrian noise, and HVAC equipment associated with neighboring buildings. The window design of the proposed courthouse was not quantitatively assessed because manufacturing specifications are not available until the construction documents for the project are finalized. Mitigation The Proposed Project would not result in significant adverse mobile source noise impacts. Sound levels associated with traffic noise would also not cause a significant noise impact, as levels would not increase above the CEQR standards of 3.0 dba. Therefore, no significant adverse noise impacts from the Proposed Project are predicted and no mitigation is required.

15.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

15.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Chapter 15: Noise 15.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This Chapter analyzes the potential for the Proposed Project s operation to have an adverse noise impact on proximate receptors. The potential

More information

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Chapter 9: Noise A. INTRODUCTION The proposed actions would allow for the development of three new buildings in the Rockefeller University Large Scale Community Facility Development (LSCFD): a new two-story,

More information

Noise October 22, Noise Existing Conditions. Noise Characteristics

Noise October 22, Noise Existing Conditions. Noise Characteristics 3.7 3.7.1 Existing Conditions Characteristics The noise analysis contained in this section of the DEIS has been conducted in accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

More information

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Chapter 20: Noise A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential noise effects of the Proposed Actions, and includes: (1) the noise effects of project-generated vehicular trips on existing and future

More information

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Chapter 20: Noise A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential noise effects of the Proposed Actions, and includes: (1) the noise effects of project-generated vehicular trips on existing and future

More information

Chapter 15: Noise A. INTRODUCTION

Chapter 15: Noise A. INTRODUCTION Chapter 15: Noise A. INTRODUCTION The Proposed Action includes improvements to the existing esplanade that runs through the project site, the creation of new public open space on piers, and the construction

More information

14: INTRODUCTION

14: INTRODUCTION Chapter 14: Noise 14.1. INTRODUCTION This Chapter analyzes the noise levels that would be produced by the Proposed Project and their potential to result in significant adverse noise impacts on the surrounding

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT Noise Study Technical Report Watertown South Connector US 81 to 29 th Street SE Watertown, South Dakota HDR Project No. 39319 Prepared by 6300 So. Old Village Place

More information

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Chapter 8: and Vibration A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential noise impacts resulting from operation of the proposed Wyandanch Intermodal Transit Facility by comparing existing noise levels

More information

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy 1. Purpose The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority) strives to be a good neighbor to adjacent communities and endeavors to address traffic

More information

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT Definitions Following is a list of commonly used terms and abbreviations that may be found within this element or when discussing the topic of noise. This is an abbreviated

More information

TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road

TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road TH 100 Interchange & Auxiliary Lane from 36 th Street to Cedar Lake Road Noise Advisory Committee Meeting Thursday October 27, 2011 6:00 7:30 p.m. Saint Louis Park City Hall 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard Saint

More information

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT 1) 9/25/06 Noise Study Technical Report; revised 05/08 2) 9/4/09 Memo Regarding Option 3 Noise Impacts to Pelican Lake Game Production Area Noise Study Technical

More information

MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA

MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA January 9, 2007 Prepared for: Valerie Young City of Redwood City 1107 Middlefield Road Redwood City, CA 94063 Prepared by: Richard

More information

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION

7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION The Noise Element of a general plan is a comprehensive program for including noise control in the planning process. It is a tool for local planners to use in achieving

More information

T.H. 100 Reconstruction in St. Louis Park Environmental Assessment. Appendix C Traffic Noise Analysis Report

T.H. 100 Reconstruction in St. Louis Park Environmental Assessment. Appendix C Traffic Noise Analysis Report T.H. 100 Reconstruction in St. Louis Park Environmental Assessment Appendix C Traffic Noise Analysis Report Highway 100 Reconstruction (State Project Number: 2734-33) July 2012 Prepared For: Minnesota

More information

APPENDIX E EAW ITEM 17 NOISE

APPENDIX E EAW ITEM 17 NOISE APPENDIX E EAW ITEM 17 NOISE TH 10 TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY TH 10 (SB I-35W TO CSAH 96) SP 6205-39 ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA Prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation October 2017 Minnesota Department

More information

Salem, Massachusetts

Salem, Massachusetts Salem, Massachusetts June 30, 2011 Prepared for: Meridian Associates Prepared by: Howard Quin Consulting LLC and Cavanaugh-Tocci Associates Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Noise Standards and Criteria...

More information

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables Traffic Noise Technical Report FM 2218 Widening (From US 59 to SH 36) Fort Bend County Prepared by: Houston District Date: July 2017 CSJ: 2093-01-010 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions

More information

McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA

McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA PREPARED BY: Bill Lawson, PE, INCE blawson@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x203 Alex Wolfe awolfe@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x209 OCTOBER 7, 2014 ii

More information

Traffic Noise Technical Report. LP 336 Widening (From IH45 to FM 1314) Montgomery County

Traffic Noise Technical Report. LP 336 Widening (From IH45 to FM 1314) Montgomery County Traffic Noise Technical Report LP 336 Widening (From IH45 to FM 1314) Montgomery County Prepared by: Houston District Date: April 2017 CSJ: 0338-11-056 The environmental review, consultation, and other

More information

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM 7 November 2017 MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHWAY NOISE MITIGATION The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has been constructing noise walls

More information

HIGHWAY NOISE STUDY ANALYSIS

HIGHWAY NOISE STUDY ANALYSIS HIGHWAY NOISE STUDY ANALYSIS Route 58 City of Norfolk Project: 0058-122-104, C501 PPMS#: 17546 From: Jett Street To: Briar Hill Road V IR G IN IA D EPARTMENT OF T RANSPORTATION Prepared By: Lloyd B. Arnold

More information

Examples of Recommended Text for Documenting Traffic Noise Analyses

Examples of Recommended Text for Documenting Traffic Noise Analyses Examples of Recommended Text for Documenting Traffic Noise Analyses Examples of recommended text to be used when preparing NEPA documents specific to traffic noise. TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division

More information

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE FUNDAMENTALS Chapter 9: oise A. ITROUCTIO oise pollution in an urban area comes from many sources. Some sources are activities essential to the health, safety, and welfare of a city s inhabitants, such as noise from

More information

Elverta Park Residential Development

Elverta Park Residential Development Environmental Noise Analysis BAC Job # 2014-117 Prepared For: Silverado Homes, Inc. Attn: Mr. Brian Spilman 3400 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 270 Roseville, CA 95661 Prepared By: Bollard Acoustical Consultants,

More information

Table Community Response to Increases in Noise Levels Estimated Community Response

Table Community Response to Increases in Noise Levels Estimated Community Response 3.11 3.11.1 Existing Conditions can be defined as undesirable or unwanted sound. Although what is considered "noise" is somewhat subjective, it affects the full range of human activities and must be considered

More information

15.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT

15.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT CHAPTER 15. NOISE 15.1 INTRODUCTION 15.1.1 CONTEXT As the third-largest business district in the country, Lower Manhattan, including the former WTC complex, has long experienced the types and intensity

More information

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Noise Element

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Noise Element Town of Portola Valley General Plan Element Last amended March 25, 2009 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 General Objectives... 1 The Environment... 1 Transportation Generated... 2 Non-Transportation

More information

Standard emission minimization measures for construction activities will be implemented, as indicated above.

Standard emission minimization measures for construction activities will be implemented, as indicated above. The nature of the proposed improvements are such that undue construction emissions should not be a concern; overall emissions should be similar to other projects of this type and magnitude. Construction

More information

Development of Noise Analysis for Assessing Traffic Noise in Certain Typical Conditions

Development of Noise Analysis for Assessing Traffic Noise in Certain Typical Conditions Minneapolis, Minnesota NOISE-CON 2005 2005 October 17-19 Development of Noise Analysis for Assessing Traffic Noise in Certain Typical Conditions Weixiong Wu AKRF Inc. 400 Park Avenue New York NY 10016

More information

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014 City of Albany Draft Environmental Assessment Multimodal Transit Center Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014 Parsons Brinckerhoff 75 Arlington Street Boston, MA 02116 Phone: 617-426-7330

More information

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011

Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011 Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy February 2, 2011 as revised February 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 1 2. Definitions... 1 3. Applicability... 5 4. Sound Fundamentals... 6 5. Highway

More information

4.10 NOISE. Introduction. Setting

4.10 NOISE. Introduction. Setting 4.10 NOISE Introduction This section evaluates potential noise impacts on nearby sensitive receptors from both short-term sources, such as construction, and long-term sources, such as project operations.

More information

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels.

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels. 6 Noise The purpose of the Noise Element is to identify the noise sources that exist within the city, and to establish guiding policies and implementing actions to mitigate their potential impacts through

More information

Appendix B: Noise Assessment

Appendix B: Noise Assessment Appendix B: Noise Assessment SUMMIT K2 CHARTER SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT EL CERRITO, CALIFORNIA October 13, 2015 Prepared for: Rebecca Gorton Lamphier-Gregory

More information

NOISE IMPACT ESTIMATES per FTA and APTA CRITERIA

NOISE IMPACT ESTIMATES per FTA and APTA CRITERIA M.A. Staiano/M 01540A -1-15 November 2002 NOISE IMPACT ESTIMATES per FTA and APTA CRITERIA Michael A. Staiano STAIANO ENGINEERING, INC. 1923 Stanley Avenue Rockville, Maryland 20851 USA presented at 7

More information

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jodi Ketelsen Michael A. Minor Date: November 4, 2012 Subject: Project: Noise Modeling Results: NE 51st Street to NE 65th Street

More information

11.0 NOISE ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON GENERAL PLAN 11-1

11.0 NOISE ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON GENERAL PLAN 11-1 NOISE ELEMENT 11-1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Government Code Section 65302(f) states the following: The General Plan shall include a noise element which shall identify and appraise noise problems in the community.

More information

Noise. Our Quality of Life. Introduction

Noise. Our Quality of Life. Introduction Noise Our Quality of Life Introduction Noise is part of everyday life in a community. Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. Whether a sound is unwanted depends on when and where it occurs, what

More information

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES NOISE ELEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Noise Standards N1. To protect the citizens of Arroyo Grande from the harmful and annoying effects of exposure to excessive noise. Policy N1-1 The noise standards

More information

Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Stationary Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared

More information

Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 002 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By:

More information

Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation 4.6 NOISE Environmental Setting. Approach to Analysis

Chapter 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation 4.6 NOISE Environmental Setting. Approach to Analysis 4.6 NOISE 4.6.1 Environmental Setting Approach to Analysis This section evaluates potential noise impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed LWRP upgrade and expansion within

More information

ASSESSMENT OF HVAC NOISE IMPACTS FROM HALF MOON BAY CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

ASSESSMENT OF HVAC NOISE IMPACTS FROM HALF MOON BAY CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ASSESSMENT OF HVAC NOISE IMPACTS FROM HALF MOON BAY CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Prepared for Prepared by Hugh Williamson Associates Inc. Postal Address: PO Box 74056, RPO Beechwood,

More information

10 NOISE ELEMENT. A. Background Information

10 NOISE ELEMENT. A. Background Information 10 NOISE ELEMENT The purpose of the Noise Element is to identify and appraise noise generation in the community in order to minimize problems from intrusive sound and to ensure that new development does

More information

Black Oak Getty Wind Farm

Black Oak Getty Wind Farm Noise Technical Report Black Oak Getty Wind Farm Stearns County, Minnesota January 19, 2016 Prepared for: Black Oak Wind, LLC Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 600 Minneapolis,

More information

ACOUSTIC STUDY OF THE SUNY CANTON WIND TURBINE CANTON, NEW YORK. June 2013

ACOUSTIC STUDY OF THE SUNY CANTON WIND TURBINE CANTON, NEW YORK. June 2013 ACOUSTIC STUDY OF THE SUNY CANTON WIND TURBINE CANTON, NEW YORK June 2013 ACOUSTIC STUDY OF THE SUNY CANTON WIND TURBINE CANTON, NEW YORK Prepared for: Sustainable Energy Developments, Inc. 317 Route 104

More information

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE 4.8.1 INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the potential for noise and groundborne vibration impacts resulting from implementation of the Proposed Project, including

More information

9.0 Noise and Vibration

9.0 Noise and Vibration 9.0 Noise and Vibration 9.1 Introduction A noise and vibration assessment was conducted to identify the potential for impacts for the proposed alternatives of the Columbia Pike Transit Initiative proposed

More information

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance 3.3 NOISE 3.3.1 Existing Setting Noise is generally defined as unwanted or objectionable sound. Sound levels are expressed as decibels (db). The A-weighted noise level has been developed to correspond

More information

NOISE ANALYSIS. C hapter INTRODUCTION

NOISE ANALYSIS. C hapter INTRODUCTION C hapter 6 NOISE ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION A preliminary study to assess the noise impact of proposed helicopter operations at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) was conducted by Charles M. Salter and Associates

More information

FORT WORTH. Photo by Liam Frederick. November 17, 2015

FORT WORTH. Photo by Liam Frederick. November 17, 2015 FORT WORTH Photo by Liam Frederick 1 November 17, 2015 IH 30/SH 360 INTERCHANGE PROJECT NOISE WORKSHOP Castillian Condominiums City of Grand Prairie, Tarrant County November 17, 2015 2 CSJs: 1068-02-076,

More information

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS Chapter 12: Noise and Vibration 12-1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential noise and vibration effects resulting from operation of the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project. The potential

More information

17 NOISE. A. Noise and Vibration Concepts

17 NOISE. A. Noise and Vibration Concepts 17 This chapter provides background information on noise in Novato. The chapter begins with an overview of noise and vibration concepts, including an explanation of noise-related terminology. The next

More information

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing

3.6 NOISE Affected Environment. Noise Level Terminology and Human Hearing 3.6 NOISE The following section provides a discussion of existing noise conditions on the BHTRP site and in the site vicinity, potential noise impacts from redevelopment under the Proposed Actions and

More information

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Assessment Orléans Gardens Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-053 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate

More information

Chapter 7 Noise. 1 How is noise perceived by the human ear?

Chapter 7 Noise. 1 How is noise perceived by the human ear? Chapter 7 Noise 1 How is noise perceived by the human ear? The human ear can perceive a range of noise levels. The range of perceptible magnitudes is so large that noise levels are generally expressed

More information

O. NOISE. 1. Existing Conditions. 2. Future without the Proposed Project

O. NOISE. 1. Existing Conditions. 2. Future without the Proposed Project O. NOISE 1. Existing Conditions Existing ambient noise conditions at the Project Site reflect surrounding land uses. As described previously (see Chapter 3.A, Land Use, Zoning and Public Policy), predominant

More information

NOISE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Inland Rail Trail Project Cities of San Marcos and Vista, San Diego County DISTRICT 11 SD CML 5381(003)

NOISE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Inland Rail Trail Project Cities of San Marcos and Vista, San Diego County DISTRICT 11 SD CML 5381(003) NOISE TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Inland Rail Trail Project Cities of San Marcos and Vista, San Diego County DISTRICT 11 SD CML 5381(003) Attention: Kevin Hovey, Environmental Branch Chief, Caltrans District

More information

PennDOTDistrict 8 I-83 East Shore Section 1 Improvements Project. Final Design Noise Analysis & Mitigation Recommendations

PennDOTDistrict 8 I-83 East Shore Section 1 Improvements Project. Final Design Noise Analysis & Mitigation Recommendations PennDOTDistrict 8 I-83 East Shore Section 1 Improvements Project Final Design Noise Analysis & Mitigation Recommendations Open House Formal Presentation Project Overview/Schedule Definitions of Common

More information

APPENDIX J.1 NOISE AND VIBRATION

APPENDIX J.1 NOISE AND VIBRATION APPENDIX J.1 NOISE AND VIBRATION Appendix J.1: Noise and Vibration A. INTRODUCTION This SDEIS appendix was prepared to support the analyses provided in Chapter 12, Noise and Vibration. The appendix is

More information

Protecting sensitive land uses, such as schools, hospitals, and libraries from sound levels in excess of residential sound levels.

Protecting sensitive land uses, such as schools, hospitals, and libraries from sound levels in excess of residential sound levels. 7.1 INTRODUCTION The Noise Element is a legally required Element and is included in this because noise in any community can be regarded as a health problem. Excessive noise may produce actual physiological

More information

Stationary Noise Feasibility Study. The Shops of Tenth Line. Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Feasibility Study. The Shops of Tenth Line. Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Feasibility Study The Shops of Tenth Line Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-040 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Jeff Parks 225 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1P9 Prepared By: Thomas Couper,

More information

Cotati Downtown Specific Plan Draft EIR

Cotati Downtown Specific Plan Draft EIR Cotati Downtown Specific Plan NOISE 4.9 NOISE 4.9.1 Issues Implementation of the DSP would result in additional vehicle traffic on certain area roadways, increasing the ambient noise along those corridors.

More information

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: City and County of Denver 201 West Colfax Avenue, Department 509 Denver,

More information

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location? Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation

More information

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION The Noise Element of the General Plan is a planning document, which is intended to provide a policy framework within which potential noise impacts may be addressed in the

More information

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Prepared for The HR Group Architects 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Studio 220 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared by Brian R. Smith, Principal INCE Board Certified

More information

4.11 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Characteristics of Noise

4.11 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Characteristics of Noise 4.11 NOISE This section of the Draft EIR presents an analysis of the proposed project s effect on the existing environment with respect to the generation of noise. Information presented in the setting

More information

Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS

Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS PREPARED BY: Bill Lawson, PE, INCE blawson@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5979 Alex Wolfe, INCE awolfe@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5977 MARCH 2018 II TABLE

More information

Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant.

Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant. 4.8 NOISE This section assesses noise impacts associated with the proposed project. It analyzes both potential noise impacts

More information

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND The major noise sources in the Planning Area are: roadway noise from traffic on Interstate 80, Highway 113 and arterial streets; railroad noise from the Union Pacific and California

More information

3. Existing Conditions and 3.6 Environmental Noise Consequences

3. Existing Conditions and 3.6 Environmental Noise Consequences 3.6 Environmental Consequences 3.5 3.5.1 WHAT IS NOISE AND HOW COULD NOISE IMPACT PEOPLE? is typically defined as any sound that is undesired or interferes with one s hearing of something. 1 The basic

More information

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics Volume 19, 2013 http://acousticalsociety.org/ ICA 2013 Montreal Montreal, Canada 2-7 June 2013 Noise Session 3aNSa: Wind Turbine Noise I 3aNSa2. Development of a real

More information

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise

More information

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise

More information

Stationary Noise Assessment. Car Dealership Strandherd Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Stationary Noise Assessment. Car Dealership Strandherd Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Stationary Noise Assessment Car Dealership Strandherd Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-114 - Noise Prepared For: Lewis Treimstra 1805 Woodward Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2C 0P9 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,

More information

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?

Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation

More information

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics 3.10 NOISE This section describes the existing noise levels in the Isla Vista project area, evaluates the potential noise related impacts of the Draft IVMP and catalyst projects, and recommends mitigation

More information

Traffic Noise Technical Report. November 2008

Traffic Noise Technical Report. November 2008 Traffic Noise Technical Report November 2008 I-70 East Draft Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Noise Technical Report Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 RESOURCE DEFINITION... 2 3.0 APPLICABLE

More information

4.10 NOISE INTRODUCTION

4.10 NOISE INTRODUCTION 4.10 NOISE INTRODUCTION This section evaluates the noise and groundborne vibration impacts resulting from the construction and operation of the Project. Noise monitoring data and calculations are included

More information

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms. 3.11 NOISE Introduction This Noise section provides a discussion of applicable noise policies and standards, the results of ambient noise measurements, an evaluation of the projects compatibility with

More information

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment Appendix F Environmental Noise Assessment TIERRA VILLAS RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA September 8, 2009 Prepared for: John Cook CirclePoint 135 Main Street, Suite

More information

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes and analyzes the current noise environment in the areas where project facilities will be located, and evaluates the potential impacts

More information

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics Environmental Noise Impact Study for the Chabot College Facilities Master Plan Hayward, CA SUBMITTED TO: DMJMH+N 515 South Flower Street, 4 th Floor Los Angeles,

More information

Appendix G: Noise Modeling

Appendix G: Noise Modeling Heritage Oaks Subdivison - Draft EIR Appendix G: Noise Modeling Michael Brandman Associates H:\Client (PN-JN)\2137\21370012\DEIR2\21370012_App Dividers.doc N OISE I MPACT A NALYSIS FOR H ERITAGE O AKS

More information

Noise Technical Report for the Fore River Bridge Replacement Study

Noise Technical Report for the Fore River Bridge Replacement Study Noise Technical Report for the Fore River Bridge Replacement Study Quincy and Weymouth, MA Prepared for: STV Incorporated 321 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 Prepared by: 66 Long Wharf Boston, MA 02110

More information

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT

Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authority The purpose of the noise element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels. 1 The 2003 Noise Element Guidelines requires

More information

268 South Main Street, South Amboy, NJ. HUD Noise Screening Analysis

268 South Main Street, South Amboy, NJ. HUD Noise Screening Analysis 268 South Main Street, South Amboy, NJ HUD Noise Screening Analysis The project does not involve new stationary noise sources and the effect of seven residential units on mobile source noise generation

More information

Section 4-7 Noise STUDY METHODS Acoustic Fundamentals Amplitude Frequency

Section 4-7 Noise STUDY METHODS Acoustic Fundamentals Amplitude Frequency Section 4-7 Noise This section includes a summary of applicable regulations, a description of ambient noise conditions, and an analysis of potential noise impacts of the proposed project. Traffic noise

More information

Community and Environmental Noise Measurement

Community and Environmental Noise Measurement Community and Environmental Noise Measurement How it differs from Occupation Noise Sampling Lee Hager, COHC, 3M PSD 1 Today s Instructor Lee Hager Past lhager@mmm.com 517-290-1907 Chair AIHA Noise Committee

More information

s:fl~a~~'illilirt~/l

s:fl~a~~'illilirt~/l JCS 13.140 Z52 National Standard of the People's Republic of China s:fl~a~~'illilirt~/l GB 3096-2008 Replace GB 3096-93 GB/T 14623-93 Environmental Quality Standard for Noise Issue on: August 19, 2008

More information

4.9 NOISE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9 1

4.9 NOISE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9 1 4.9 NOISE This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from noise and vibration associated with construction and operation of the Project. The analysis describes the existing noise environment within

More information

Appendix F Noise Memorandum

Appendix F Noise Memorandum Appendix F Noise Memorandum Draft Environmental Impact Report Rosamond Solar by SGS Antelope Valley Development, LLC F 1 July 2010 ESA 209595.05 Memorandum Date: To: Cc: From: Subject: Joan Heredia, Sempra

More information

NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT UPDATE FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT UPDATE FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT UPDATE FOR THE VROOMAN ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT PERRY AND LEROY TOWNSHIPS, LAKE COUNTY, OHIO (PID 5669) PREPARED BY: MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC. 1228 EUCLID AVENUE SUITE 1050

More information

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment APPENDIX C Environmental Noise Assessment This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Noise Assessment San Joaquin Valley Christian School Merced County, California BAC Job # 2015-085 Prepared For:

More information

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA Charles M Salter Associates Inc BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Kim Havens Wilson Meany Sullivan Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330

More information

APPENDIX D NOISE QUALITY ANALYSIS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

APPENDIX D NOISE QUALITY ANALYSIS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS APPENDIX D NOISE QUALITY ANALYSIS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS Overview Ambient noise measurements were taken at 24 sites along the proposed project alignment alternatives. These sites were located to represent

More information

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology

CREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology CREATE Noise and Assessment Methodology June 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. BACKGROUND... 1 3. OVERALL FTA IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY... 2 4. KEY ELEMENTS OF NOISE ASSESSMENT... 4 4.1

More information