CHAPTER 26. SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNEX
|
|
- John Haynes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 26. SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNEX 26.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Mike Picard, Battalion Chief 1500 Bollinger Canyon Rd San Ramon, CA Telephone: Address: Alternate Point of Contact Bryan Collins, Assistant Chief - Operations 1500 Bollinger Canyon Rd San Ramon, CA Telephone: Address: bcollins@srvfire.ca.gov 26.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE The San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) is an autonomous Special District as defined under the Fire Protection District Law of 1987, Health and Safety Code, Section 13800, of the State of California. The SRVFPD is responsible for providing the highest level of emergency and non-emergency services to the community in an effort to protect life, the environment and property. The early beginnings of the SRVFPD took place during a meeting on March 19, 1912 when the Danville Farm Defense Fire District was established. Numerous reorganizations and mergers have resulted in the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District as it exists today. A five-member elected Board of Directors, each serving a staggered four year term, governs the SRVFPD. The Fire Chief oversees general operations of the SRVFPD in accordance with the policy direction prescribed by the Board of Directors. The Fire Chief also serves as Treasurer for the District. The primary source of revenue for the operation of the SRVFPD is generated through the collection of secured, unsecured, and supplemental property taxes (92 percent), with most remaining revenue coming from ambulance service fees and interest income. The SRVFPD employs nearly 200 personnel, in addition to approximately fifty volunteers serving in four separate volunteer programs. The SRVFPD maintains ten fire stations, two annex buildings, one training site and one administrative building. Of the ten fire stations, nine house paid firefighters and one remote station is staffed by fifteen volunteer personnel. There are also approximately eleven reserve firefighters. The SRVFPD staffs fifteen companies, including structure and wildland engines, three truck companies, five transport Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulances, and specialized Hazardous Materials, Urban Search and Rescue, Mobile Communications, and other support units. In addition, the SRVFPD operates its own nationally accredited (NAEMD) Communications Center staffed daily with three Dispatchers. All other Administrative personnel reside at the Administrative Office. The SRVFPD service area encompasses approximately 155 square miles, covering the communities of Alamo, Blackhawk, the Town of Danville, Diablo, the City of San Ramon, the southern area of Morgan Territory and the Tassajara Valley. Within the boundaries of the SRVFPD are expansive wildland areas, large single-family homes and multi-residential complexes, hotels, a regional hospital, numerous convalescent/assisted living facilities, equestrian areas, hiking trails, rock climbing areas, and a facility housing a low-level nuclear reactor. The SRVFPD is also bisected by a major interstate highway (I-680). The total population served by the SRVFPD in 2009 exceeded 167,500. On business days, this figure grows by another 30,000 to include people employed in the Bishop Ranch Business Park, a 585 acre development with nine million square feet of office space located in San Ramon. Since its inception in 1984, the Business Park has evolved into a nationally recognized premier business center, comprised of 26-1
2 over 300 diverse companies ranging from established Global 500 companies such as the corporate headquarters of Chevron Corporation to innovative start-ups in high growth fields. The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction: Population Served In 2009, the SRVFPD population exceeded 167,500 which grows by another 30,000 on business days to include people employed in the Bishop Ranch Business Park. Land Area Served Approximately 155 square miles Value of Area Served In fiscal year 2009, total assessed value of taxable property in SRVFPD was $35,197,421,497 Land Area Owned Approximately 15.1 acres or 659,085 square feet of land List of Critical Infrastructure/Equipment Owned by the Jurisdiction: Eighteen Type I Engines Three Type I Tractor Drawn Aerial Ladder Trucks Ten wildland units Three water tenders One Type I Mobile Communications unit One Type II Hazardous Materials Response unit One Type II Urban Search and Rescue unit One Air & Light unit Five Advanced life Support (ALS) modular ambulances Total Value of Critical Infrastructure/Equipment The total value of critical infrastructure and equipment owned by the jurisdiction is $18,637,000. List of Critical Facilities Owned by the Jurisdiction: Ten Fire Stations One Communications Center One administrative office building Two annex buildings One Training site Total Value of Critical Facilities The total value of critical facilities owned by the jurisdiction is $24,786,201 Current and Anticipated Service Trends A slowdown in new building and density of land uses will represent a minor to moderate increase in population and thus a projected low increase in call volume. The SRVFPD has experienced a steady average annual increase in call volume, however for fiscal year 2009 there was a decrease in call volume of 2.94 percent. The jurisdiction s boundaries are shown on Figure 1-1. The boundaries are generally as follows: Northern boundary: Alamo/Unincorporated Contra Costa County (Walnut Creek) border Eastern boundary: Los Vaqueros Reservoir and East Contra Costa County Fire District border 26-2
3 Southern boundary: Contra Costa County/Alameda County line Western boundary: Contra Costa County/Alameda County line 26.3 JURISDICTION-SPECIFIC NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Table 26-1 lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction HAZARD RISK RANKING Table 26-2 presents the ranking of the hazards of concern APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND PLANS The following existing codes, ordinances, policies or plans are applicable to this hazard mitigation plan: California Department of Public Health California and US Environmental Protection Agencies California Code of Regulations Federal Endangered Species Act California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) SRVFPD Ordinances # 16, 18, 22 SRVFPD Resolution Contra Costa County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District Disaster Mitigation Plan SRVFPD 2009 Standards of Cover SRVFPD 2009 Damage Assessment Guide Contra Costa County Community Wildfire Protection Plan 26.6 CLASSIFICATION IN HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAMS The jurisdiction s classifications under various hazard mitigation programs are presented in Table HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN AND EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDED INITIATIVES Table 26-4 lists the initiatives that make up the jurisdiction s hazard mitigation plan. Table 26-5 identifies the priority for each initiative. Table 26-6 summarizes the mitigation initiatives by hazard of concern and the six mitigation types. 26-3
4 TABLE NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS Type of Event FEMA Disaster # Date Preliminary Damage Assessment Landslide NA 2008 No estimates available Wind NA 2008 No estimates available Frost Damage NA 2007 No estimates available Landslide NA 2006 No estimates available Landslide NA 2005 No estimates available Landslide NA 2004 No estimates available Flood NA 2003 No estimates available Frost Damage/Wind NA 2002 No estimates available Landslide NA 2001 No estimates available Wind NA 2001 No estimates available Landslide NA 2000 No estimates available Heat/Wind NA 2000 No estimates available Landslide NA 1999 No estimates available Wind NA 1999 No estimates available Landslide NA 1998 No estimates available Wind NA 1998 No estimates available Severe Storm/Wind NA 1995 No estimates available Frost Damage NA 1994 No estimates available Wind NA 1993 No estimates available Heat/Wind/Frost Damage NA 1992 No estimates available Frost Damage NA 1990 No estimates available Frost Damage NA 1989 No estimates available Wind NA 1988 No estimates available Wind NA 1987 No estimates available Severe Storm/Wind NA 1983 No estimates available Wind NA 1982 No estimates available Frost Damage NA 1981 No estimates available Severe Storm NA 1980 No estimates available 26-4
5 TABLE HAZARD RISK RANKING Rank Hazard Type Risk Rating Score (Probability x Impact) 1 Wildfire 54 2 Earthquake 48 3 Flood 36 4 Landslide 36 5 Severe Weather 12 6 Drought 6 7 Dam Failure 0 TABLE COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATIONS Participating? Classification Date Classified Public Protection No N/A N/A Storm Ready No N/A N/A Firewise No N/A N/A Tsunami Ready No N/A N/A Applies to new or existing assets Hazards Mitigated TABLE HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Objectives Met Lead Agency Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Initiative 1 Support County-wide initiatives identified in Volume 1. New & Existing All Hazards All County Low District Funds Short Term, Initiative 2 Continue to support the implementation, monitoring, maintenance, and updating of this Plan, as defined in Volume 1. New & Existing All Hazards All County Low District Funds, FEMA Mitigation Grant Funding for 5-year update Initiative 3 Integrate Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into the Safety Element of the General Plan Short Term, New & Existing All Hazards 4, 5, 14 County Low District Funds Short Term, 26-5
6 Applies to new or existing assets Hazards Mitigated TABLE 26-4 (continued). HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Objectives Met Lead Agency Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Initiative 4 Pre-position emergency power generation capacity in critical buildings to maintain continuity of government and services New & Existing All Hazards 12, 13 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 5 Comply with all applicable building and fire codes, as well as other regulations (such as State requirements for fault, landslide, and liquefaction investigations in particular mapped areas) when constructing or significantly remodeling infrastructure facilities New & Existing All Hazards 1, 2, 7, 15 SRVFPD Med District Funds Short Term Initiative 6 Clarify to workers in critical facilities and emergency personnel, as well as to elected officials and the public, the extent to which the facilities are expected to perform only at a life safety level (allowing for the safe evacuation of personnel) or are expected to remain functional following an earthquake New & Existing Earthquake 2, 13 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 7 Ensure a reliable source of water for fire suppression (meeting acceptable standards for minimum volume and duration of flow) for existing and new development New & Existing Wildfire 1, 2, 4, 5 SRVFPD Med District Funds Short Term Initiative 8 Develop and maintain a coordinated approach between fire jurisdictions and water supply agencies to identify needed improvements to the water distribution system, initially focusing on areas of highest wildfire hazard New & Existing Wildfire 2, 6, 13, 16 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 9 Develop a defensible space vegetation program that includes the clearing or thinning of (a) non-fire resistive vegetation within 30 feet of access and evacuation roads and routes to critical facilities, or (b) all nonnative species (such as eucalyptus and pine, but not necessarily oaks) within 30 feet of access and evacuation roads and routes to critical facilities. New & Existing Wildfire 11, 12 SRVFPD Low District Funds, PDM, HMGP Short Term Initiative 10 Ensure all dead-end segments of public roads in high hazard areas have at least a T intersection turn-around sufficient for typical wildland fire equipment. New & Existing Wildfire 11, 12 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 11 Enforce a minimum road width of 20 feet with an additional 10-foot clearance on each shoulder on all driveways and road segments greater than 50 feet in length in wildfire hazard areas. New & Existing Wildfire 11, 12 SRVFPD Med District Funds Short Term 26-6
7 Applies to new or existing assets Hazards Mitigated TABLE 26-4 (continued). HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Objectives Met Lead Agency Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Initiative 12 Require that development in high fire hazard areas provide adequate access roads (with width and vertical clearance that meet the minimum standards of the Fire Code or relevant local ordinance), onsite fire protection systems, evacuation signage, and fire breaks. New & Existing Wildfire 4, 11, 12 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 13 Ensure adequate fire equipment road or fire road access to developed and open space areas. New & Existing Wildfire 11, 12,, 14 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 14 Maintain fire roads and/or public right-of-way roads and keep them passable at all times. New & Existing Wildfire 11, 12 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term Initiative 15 Continue maintenance efforts to keep drains, storm drains and creeks free of obstructions, while retaining vegetation in the channel (as appropriate), to allow for free flow of water New & Existing Flood 1, 2, 10 SRVFPD Low District Funds, HMGP, PDM Short Term Initiative 16 Facilitate and/or coordinate the distribution of materials that are prepared by others, such as by placing materials in District, city or utility newsletters, websites, or on community access channels, as appropriate. New & Existing All Hazards 1, 2, 16 SRVFPD Low District Funds Short Term 26-7
8 Initiative # # of Objectives Met Benefits Costs TABLE MITIGATION STRATEGY PRIORITY SCHEDULE Do Benefits Equal or Exceed Costs? Is Project Grant- Eligible? Can Project Be Funded Under Existing Programs/Budgets? Prioritya 1 16 Medium Low Yes No No High 2 16 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High 3 3 Low Low Yes No Yes High 4 3 High Low Yes Yes Yes High 5 4 Medium Medium Yes Yes No Med 6 2 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High 7 4 High Medium Yes Yes No Med 8 4 High Low Yes No Yes Med 9 2 Medium Low Yes Yes No Med 10 2 Medium Low Yes No Yes Low 11 2 Medium Medium Yes No Yes Low 12 3 Medium Low Yes Yes No Med 13 3 Medium Low Yes Yes No Med 14 2 Medium Low Yes Yes No Med 15 3 Low Low Yes Yes Yes High 16 3 Low Low Yes Yes Yes High a. Explanation of priorities High Priority: Project meets multiple plan objectives, benefits exceed cost, funding is secured under existing programs, or is grant eligible, and project can be completed in 1 to 5 years (i.e., short term project) once funded. Medium Priority: Project meets at least 1 plan objective, benefits exceed costs, requires special funding authorization under existing programs, grant eligibility is questionable, and project can be completed in 1 to 5 years once funded. Low Priority: Project will mitigate the risk of a hazard, benefits exceed costs, funding has not been secured, project is not grant eligible, and time line for completion is long term (5 to 10 years). 26-8
9 Hazard Type 1. Prevention TABLE ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION INITIATIVES 2. Property Protection Drought 2, 3 1, 2 Initiative Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Type 3. Public 4. Natural Education and Resource Awareness Protection 5. Emergency Services 6. Structural Projects Earthquake 2, 3, 5, 8 5 1, 2, 6, 16 4, 5 5 Flood 2, 3, 5, , 2, 6, Landslide 2, 3, 5 5 1, 2, 6 5 Severe Weather Dam Failure 2, 3, 5 5 1, 2, 6 4, 5 Wild Fire 2, 3, 7, 9, 12 8, 9, 12 1, 2, 6, 16 8, 13 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Notes: 1. Prevention: Government, administrative or regulatory actions that influence the way land and buildings are developed to reduce hazard losses. Includes planning and zoning, floodplain laws, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and stormwater management regulations. 2. Property Protection: Modification of buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or removal of structures from a hazard area. Includes acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofit, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. 3. Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform citizens and elected officials about hazards and ways to mitigate them. Includes outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school-age and adult education. 4. Natural Resource Protection: Actions that minimize hazard loss and preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. Includes sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. 5. Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after a hazard event. Includes warning systems, emergency response services, and the protection of essential facilities. 6. Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Includes dams, setback levees, floodwalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. 26-9
10 26-10
San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District STRATEGIC PLAN
San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District STRATEGIC PLAN 2008-2013 I am very pleased to present the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District s Strategic Plan for 2008 through 2013. The Strategic Plan
More informationSECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES
SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES This section presents mitigation actions for Onondaga County to reduce potential exposure and losses identified as concerns in the Risk Assessment portion of this plan.
More informationANNEX M: HAMILTON CREEK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
ANNEX M: HAMILTON CREEK METROPOLITAN DISTRICT M.1 Community Profile (HCMD) is a special district in Summit County. The District operates under the direction of a five person, elected Board of Directors.
More informationSECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY
SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY This section describes the process by which the Lehigh Valley Steering Committee and municipal planning partnership performed the update to the county and local mitigation
More informationClay Macon. Kickoff Meeting. January 6, Peeks Creek Landslide, Macon County, NC Photo Source: Wikipedia
Clay Macon Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Kickoff Meeting January 6, 2015 Peeks Creek Landslide, Macon County, NC Photo Source: Wikipedia Handouts Agenda Presentation Slides Data Collection Tools Public
More informationOVERVIEW... 1 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS... 2
A P P E N D I X B OVERVIEW... 1 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS... 2 OVERVIEW Otsego County prepared public surveys that asked a wide range of questions concerning the opinions of the public regarding natural and
More information6 CITY OF EDMONDS ANNEX
6 CITY OF EDMONDS ANNEX 6.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Michael Cawrse, Stormwater Technician 121 5 th Avenue N Edmonds, WA, 98020 Telephone: 425-771-0220 e-mail: michael.cawrse@edmonds.wa
More information15 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ANNEX
15 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ANNEX 15.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Steve Osguthorpe, CED Director 6100 219 th St SW STE 200 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Telephone:
More informationCLINTON COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
CLINTON COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PREPARED FOR CLINTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 22 CREE DRIVE LOCK HAVEN, PA 17745 PREPARED BY THE CLINTON COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION TEAM Executive Summary
More informationExecutive Summary. San Marcos Pass - Eastern Goleta Valley Mountainous Communities Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Executive Summary San Marcos Pass - Eastern Goleta Valley Mountainous Communities Community Wildfire Protection Plan The San Marcos Pass and Eastern Goleta Valley (SMP/EGV) Mountainous Communities Community
More informationMitigation Strategy. 5.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The mitigation goals, objectives, and strategies outlined below were developed by both the steering committee and working groups. Prior to beginning the working group meetings, the steering committee reviewed
More informationClimate Smart Resiliency Plans, Policies, and Projects Improvement Plan for: The Town of Caroline
Climate Smart Resiliency Plans, Policies, and Projects Improvement Plan for: The Town of Caroline Overview This document should serve as a supplement to the Climate Smart Resiliency Planning Evaluation
More informationSECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES
SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES This section presents mitigation actions for Cayuga County to reduce potential exposure and losses identified as concerns in the Risk Assessment portion of this plan. The
More informationHumboldt County Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2013 UPDATE
Humboldt County Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2013 UPDATE Humboldt County Fire Safe Council A committee appointed by your Board to oversee the maintenance and implementation of the County s fire plan
More informationMitigation for Emergency Managers. Mitigation for Emergency Managers
Unit 1: Course Introduction Administrative Information Emergency procedures Mobile devices Breaks Questions Course materials Receiving credit Evaluation forms Action item list 3 Emergency Management Mission
More informationTOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON ADOPTED HAZARD MUTIGATION PLAN COMMUNITY #
TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON ADOPTED HAZARD MUTIGATION PLAN COMMUNITY # 375353 Since the last application for continued participation in the Community Rating System
More informationCommunity Wildfire Protection Plan Development Process for Santa Barbara County
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Development Process for Santa Barbara County The purpose of a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is to identify and prioritize areas for hazardous fuel reduction
More informationNatural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary
1. Introduction Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary Kankakee County s first Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan was adopted by the Kankakee County Board on October 11,
More informationKane County Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee
Kane County Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee Annual Report For 2004 TO: Members of the Kane County Board FROM: Kane County Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee SUBJECT: Annual Report for 2004 Date:
More informationAppendix IV Village of Bald Head Island Hazard Mitigation Plan. Mitigation Strategy
Appendix IV Island Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy This section of the Plan summarizes study conclusions, outlines community goals and objectives, and describes the action plan to reduce vulnerability
More informationHouston-Galveston Area Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Initial Planning Workshop
Houston-Galveston Area Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan Initial Planning Workshop Overview Project Approach Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Capability Assessment Policy Development and Project
More informationNORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES
Eastern Shore of Virginia Hazard Mitigation Plan NORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES Northampton County is the southernmost county on the Eastern Shore of Virginia. There are 6 towns within the county.
More informationHandout #1 Draft Action Plan City of Los Angeles Floodplain Management Plan 2015 Update
P-1 Maintain the City Tsunami Response Plan Annex and community education effort and participate in the Los Angeles County Operational Area Tsunami Mitigation Task Force. EMD, HD General, HD Low. Work
More informationUS 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY
US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY Jacksonville, Texas PUBLIC MEETING #3 August28 th 2018 1 Welcome to the final public meeting for the US 69 Relief Route Study in Jacksonville. This presentation will give a recap
More informationCommunity Wildfire Protection Plan. Big Elk Meadows Larimer County, Colorado 7/3/2007
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Big Elk Meadows Larimer County, Colorado 7/3/2007 Introduction This Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) was developed by Big Elk Meadows with guidance and support
More informationHumboldt Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Volume 1: Planning-Area-Wide Elements PART 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY
Humboldt Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Volume 1: Planning-Area-Wide Elements PART 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY CHAPTER 18. MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES To support each planning partner s development
More informationAPPENDIX 5: PIONEER/VOLCANO PLAN- NING UNIT COMMUNITY FEATURES
APPENDIX 5: PIONEER/VOLCANO PLAN- NING UNIT COMMUNITY FEATURES CONTENTS Pioneer/Volcano Community Features... 102 5.1. Social and Political Setting... 102 5.1.1. Cultural Resources... 102 5.1.2. Population
More informationGoose Creek Watershed Assessment Summary October 2003
Goose Creek Watershed Assessment Summary October 2003 The Goose Creek Watershed The Goose Creek watershed is 385 square miles, covering nearly half of Loudoun County and one-quarter of Fauquier County
More informationNORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES
Eastern Shore of Virginia Hazard Mitigation Plan NORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES Northampton County is the southernmost county on the Eastern Shore of Virginia. There are 6 towns within the county.
More informationWelcome and Introductions Project Overview Draft Plan Review
Public Review of Draft Plan September 20, 2016 Welcome and Introductions Project Overview Draft Plan Review Planning Process Risk Assessment Capability Assessment Mitigation Strategy Plan Maintenance Planning
More informationLOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE March 3, 2016
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE March 3, 2016 Welcome City of Oakland- Bureau of Planning SF Bay Conservation and Development Commission Association of Bay Area Governments Devan
More informationHAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING October 5, 2016 Joseph Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission DOCS #232977 What is Mitigation? Mitigation is any sustained action
More informationVillage of Gurnee, Illinois Flood Mitigation Plan. Executive Summary. November 15, Flood Mitigation Planning Committee
Village of Gurnee, Illinois Flood Mitigation Plan Executive Summary November 15, 2001 Flood Mitigation Planning Committee The Lake County Stormwater Management Commission (SMC) has initiated a program
More informationCHAPTER 5 OVERLAY ZONES
CHAPTER 5 OVERLAY ZONES SECTION: 10-5-1: Conditional Use Permit Required 10-5-2: Sensitive Areas 10-5-3: Hazard Flood Zone (HF) 10-5-4: Hazard Slope Zone (HS) 10-5-5: Hazard Water Table Zone (HW) 10-5-6:
More informationNo Adverse Impact Floodplain Management
No Adverse Impact Floodplain Management June 6, 2013 Beth Lucas, Senior Planner Broome County Planning No Adverse Impact Developed by Association of State Floodplain Managers Purposes: Address the shortcomings
More information3.14 Public Services Physical Setting. Methodology
3.14 Public Services This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report (EIS/R) describes the existing public services within the Eden Landing Phase 2 area of the South Bay Salt Pond (SBSP)
More informationWater Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)
Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP) Natalie Rees Salt Lake County Flood Control & Engineering Division 2008 Watershed Symposium COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY Salt Lake County
More informationLOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE April 25, 2016
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE April 25, 2016 Welcome City Council District 1 City of Oakland Bureau of Planning City of Oakland Sustainable Oakland Council President Lynette Gibson
More informationTWIN PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
TWIN PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT Twin Platte NRD Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Twin Platte NRD Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2016 1 INTRODUCTION This HMP
More informationSECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES
SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES This section presents mitigation actions for Tioga County to reduce potential exposure and losses identified as concerns in the Risk Assessment portion of this plan. The
More informationRegulating the Wildland Urban Interface
Regulating the Wildland Urban Interface How Municipalities can Help Curb the Megafire Epidemic RMLUI Land Use Conference March 1, 2012 Denver, CO Colorado Wildfire Background Last two major fires in Colorado
More informationUniversity of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Steering Committee Meeting November 7, 2014 Chief Joe Monroe UK Police Department Captain Tom Matlock UK Crisis Management and Preparedness
More informationLOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE April 18, 2016
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE April 18, 2016 Welcome City Council District 1 City of Oakland Bureau of Planning City of Oakland Sustainable Oakland Councilmember Dan Kalb Devan
More informationa. The following regulations shall apply to all guest ranches:
SECTION 15 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 15.1 Guest Ranches. a. The following regulations shall apply to all guest ranches: (1) Individual guest ranch quarters shall not contain Kitchen or cooking facilities.
More informationEl Dorado County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Community Tab for ROYAL EQUESTRIAN ESTATES FIRE SAFE COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
El Dorado County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Community Tab for ROYAL EQUESTRIAN ESTATES FIRE SAFE COUNCIL ACTIVITIES Prepared for Inclusion in the: EL DORADO COUNTY FIRE SAFE COUNCIL Community Wildfire
More informationDOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 17 Wildfire Hazard - Overlay District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-
SECTION 17 WILDFIRE HAZARD - OVERLAY DISTRICT -Section Contents- 1701 Intent... 17-2 1702 Definitions... 17-2 1703 Applicability... 17-5 1704 Wildfire Hazard Overlay District Map... 17-6 1705 Wildfire
More informationAnnex to 2010 Association of Bay Area Governments Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Taming Natural Disasters TOWN OF WINDSOR
Annex to 2010 Association of Bay Area Governments Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Taming Natural Disasters TOWN OF WINDSOR Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 The Regional Planning
More information3F. Hydrology and Water Quality
This section provides an analysis of potential hydrological and water quality impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. The section also evaluates and describes the potential impacts
More informationFlood Mitigation Plan
City of Huntsville, Alabama Flood Mitigation Plan 2001 Prepared by Flood Mitigation Planning Committee June 1, 2001 City of Huntsville, Alabama Flood Mitigation Plan Executive Summary 1973 1999 Prepared
More informationRIPON MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN
RIPON AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN Prepared by the City of Ripon For San Joaquin LAFCO October 29, 2009 2009 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT SUBMITTED BY CITY OF RIPON OCTOBER 29, 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 - Project Location The proposed incorporation of the Arden Arcade Community (project or proposed incorporation) would result in the establishment of a new city. LAFCo
More informationNDSU - North Dakota Forest Service North Dakota Cooperative Fire Protection Initiative Budget Request
Agency Information NDSU - North Dakota Forest Service North Dakota Cooperative Fire Protection Initiative 2015-17 Budget Request North Dakota State Board of Higher Education May 29, 2014 NDSU-North Dakota
More informationGoal 1: Inform and educate to all residents of the county concerning hazards and mitigation efforts
Hazard Mitigation Mission Statement and Goals UMission Statement The mission of the Price County Hazard Mitigation Plan is establish sound public policy protect life, property, and the quality of the natural
More informationEconomics and Alluvial Fans. Alluvial Fan Task Force Plenary Meeting 4 March 14, 2008
Economics and Alluvial Fans Presentation by: Dr. W. Bowman (Bo) Cutter, Ph.D. Autumn DeWoody Alluvial Fan Task Force Plenary Meeting 4 March 14, 2008 Economics/Water Resource Management University of California
More informationTable G - 7. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Eyota ( ) (From Olmsted County Master Mitigation Action Chart)
Multi-Hazard Plan, 2017 Table G - 7. Actions Identified for by the City of () (From Master Action Chart) City of Action Comments on 1 All- Hazards Preparedness & Response Support Identify and map locations
More informationFrequently Asked Questions. Rebuilding After the 2017 Redwood Complex Fire
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES 860 N. Bush Street- Ukiah, California 95482 Telephone 707-234-6650 Fax 707-463-5709 Rebuilding After the 2017 Redwood Complex Fire 1. When
More information4 ESF 4 Firefighting
4 ESF 4 Firefighting THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Table of Contents 1 Purpose... ESF 4-1 2 Scope... ESF 4-1 3 Roles and Responsibilities... ESF 4-1 3.1 Primary Agencies... ESF 4-1 3.1.1 Oregon Department
More informationDraft Environmental Impact Report
Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report San Francisquito Creek Flood Protection, Ecosystem Restoration, and Recreation Project Upstream of Highway 101 This notice announces that a Draft Environmental
More informationDRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT
2.6 SAFETY ELEMENT The Safety Element of a General Plan addresses protection from any unreasonable risks associated with hazards such as fire, flood, and earthquakes. Public safety issues related to fire
More informationLOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE March 16, 2016
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION UPDATE AND REGIONAL RESILIENCE March 16, 2016 Welcome City of Oakland- Bureau of Planning SF Bay Conservation and Development Commission Association of Bay Area Governments Devan
More informationB. Wildfire Mitigation
B. Wildfire Mitigation Addendum Part B supplements the information in Parts I through VIII of the HMA Unified Guidance. Addendum Part B is applicable to HMGP and the PDM Program and supersedes FEMA Mitigation
More informationChapter 1 Introduction
ExhibÌt 2b Ðraft Background Report - chapter 1 lntroduction CountY of Ventura Planning Cómmiásion Work Session #3 ' * PLz-0141- Agenda ltem 6 ein oit 2b - Draft Background léóãtt - ChaPter I lntroduction
More informationCommunity Wildfire Protection Plan Red Feather Lakes Larimer County, Colorado. February 1, 2006 UPDATED April 26, 2007
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Red Feather Lakes Larimer County, Colorado February 1, 2006 UPDATED April 26, 2007 Introduction This Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) was developed by Red Feather
More informationFACT SHEET: FEMA GRANT FUNDING FOR OAKLAND HILLS CITY OF OAKLAND August 27, 2015
FACT SHEET: FEMA GRANT FUNDING FOR OAKLAND HILLS CITY OF OAKLAND August 27, 2015 This fact sheet is presented to you in response to various articles in the news relating to Oakland s acceptance of FEMA
More information2030 General Plan. November 1, :00 p.m.
2030 General Plan GPAC Meeting #7 November 1, 2007 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission Review of Land Use Map Planning Commission concurred with most GPAC recommendations Exceptions include: Consider area along
More informationVirginia Tech Hazard Mitigation Plan
Virginia Tech Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2006 Purpose of the Plan Virginia Tech Hazard Mitigation Plan Executive Summary Disasters can impact universities in a multitude of ways. In addition to the
More informationEnvironment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP)
Project Title: Total Project Budget: $ Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2015 Request for Proposals (RFP) Flood Recovery on Sargent Creek Duluth Habitat Restoration Category: Proposed Project
More informationVillage of Cross Plains
Memorandum To: Capital Area Regional Planning Commission (CARPC) From: Matthew G. Schuenke, Village Administrator/Clerk-Treasurer CC: Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Date: February 1, 2016 Re: Cross
More informationSAFETY AND NOISE 9. Safety and Noise
SAFETY AND NOISE 9 9 Safety and Noise Safety is a basic human need and is required for a community to thrive. The goals and policies in this element are designed to protect and enhance public health and
More informationMitigation Plan Mission, Goals and Action Items
Section 4: Mitigation Plan Mission, Goals and Action Items Introduction... 2 Mission... 2 Mitigation Plan Goals... 2 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Action Items... 3 Coordinating Organization... 4 Partner
More informationCollaboration: Sea Level Marin Adaptation Response Team Phase II
Collaboration: Sea Level Marin Adaptation Response Team Phase II 2018-2020 Scope of Work Background Climate experts estimate that by 2100, sea level could rise by up to 70 inches, though recent projections
More informationRecent trends and strategies for adaptation to wildfire in the US
Recent trends and strategies for adaptation to wildfire in the US Tania Schoennagel, PhD University of Colorado-Boulder Adapting Wildfire Management to 21st Century Conditions Policy & Critical Issues
More informationAppendix C Risk Assessment Methods
Appendix C Risk Assessment Methods The following section outlines the specific methods, data, and values used to evaluate wildfire risk in Lane County. Identifying the Wildland Urban Interface Risk The
More informationSECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project
SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 6.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR include an analysis of a range of project alternatives that could feasibly attain most
More informationWill County Site Development Permit Submittal Checklist TAB 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
Applicant: Reviewer: Permit No.: The following tables contain a checklist of the requirements before a review for a Site Development Permit submittal will be accepted. Not all requirements pertain to every
More informationKANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CLASS I & II GRADING AND DRAINAGE/STOMRWATER PERMIT APPLICATION
KANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CLASS I & II GRADING AND DRAINAGE/STOMRWATER PERMIT APPLICATION Michael J. Van Mill, AICP Planning Director 189 East Court Street Kankakee, IL 60901
More informationAgenda Item #5 Attachment A Appendix B Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7 The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Although the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE, formerly known as CDF) is not a local entity,
More information5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 5.1 INTRODUCTION A preliminary environmental review was performed on the proposed freeway improvements that form Concept C, which encompasses the three freeway corridors
More informationSECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant
SECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant 9.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT The City of Santa Clarita conducted an Initial Study in April 2006 to determine significant effects of the proposed
More informationCity of Tacoma Stormwater Management Program Assessment. Attachment B3
City of Tacoma Stormwater Management Program Assessment Attachment B3 Attachment B3. City of Tacoma Stormwater Management Program Assessment The following discussion includes an assessment of the appropriateness
More informationStream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM
Stream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox 1 Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM www.apaienv.com Stream Buffers - Overview 2 Why stream buffers? Floodplain management and other benefits Existing regulatory
More informationFIREWISE PLAN For. Southview Trails Community Association
FIREWISE PLAN 2010 For Southview Trails Community Association Preface The Firewise Committee of the Southview Trails Community Association (STCA) submits this Firewise Plan 2010 along with the Firewise
More informationMEMORANDUM. Governor John Hickenlooper & Members of the Colorado General Assembly
690 Kipling Street, Suite 3000 Lakewood, CO 80215 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Governor John Hickenlooper & Members of the Colorado General Assembly Paul L. Cooke, Director (Outgoing) DATE: April 25, 2016 RE:
More information2010 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 San Mateo County Annex
Table of Contents The Regional Planning Process... 2 The Local Planning Process... 2 Review and Incorporation of Existing Information... 2 Process of Updating Plan Sections... 3 Public Meetings... 4 Hazards
More informationCOASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: SAN DIEGO RIVER CALMAT PROPERTY PHASE 2
COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: SAN DIEGO RIVER CALMAT PROPERTY PHASE 2 File No. 03-137 Project Manager: Marc Beyeler RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization
More informationHAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE
FEDERAL INSURANCE ANDMITIGATION ADMINISTRATION HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE New Partners for Smart Growth Conference - February 3, 2018 Jennie Orenstein, FEMA HQ 1 Objectives By the end of this session
More informationPLANNING FOR A COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN
PLANNING FOR A COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN San Luis Obispo County Senior Project Prepared by Justin Sauder B.S. City and Regional Planning Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Advisor: William Siembieda Summer
More informationAnnex to 2010 Association of Bay Area Governments Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Taming Natural Disasters CITY OF SAN LEANDRO
Annex to 2010 Association of Bay Area Governments Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Taming Natural Disasters CITY OF SAN LEANDRO Table of Contents Introduction... 2 The Regional Planning Process... 2 The Local
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Lower Platte South NRD Past and Present 1. Map of Lower Platte South NRD 2. Vision for the Future 3.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ii Lower Platte South NRD Past and Present 1 Map of Lower Platte South NRD 2 Vision for the Future 3 Vision Table 5 i INTRODUCTION The Master Plan is the document that expresses
More informationCoastal and River Flooding Events
Coastal and River Flooding Events A Discussion Paper about Community Resilience November 2015 Brief: Warmer temperatures are reducing winter snow accumulations at higher elevations, increasing storm intensity
More informationHydromodification Management Measures
Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in
More informationHydromodification Management Measures
Chapter 7 Hydromodification Management Measures This Chapter summarizes the requirements for controlling erosive flows from development projects. 7.1 Why Require Hydromodification Management? Changes in
More informationFarmington Dam Repurpose Project
Farmington Dam Repurpose Project 2017 $158,100,000 to re-purpose the Farmington Dam from flood protection only to a long-term water storage facility that increases water supply reliability to the region.
More informationI. Welcome & Introductions WPAC History (Paul Racette, PEC)
Poquessing Creek Watershed ACT 167 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Public Hearing July 10, 2012 I. Welcome & Introductions ---------- WPAC History (Paul Racette, PEC) Primary WPAC Members: Bucks County: Bensalem
More informationCITY OF SAN DIEGO COMMENTS ON THE SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH PROJECT (SUB ).
Attn: John Helmer 201 North Broadway Escondio, CA 92025 Submitted via email to: Jhelmer@escondido.org Subject: CITY OF SAN DIEGO COMMENTS ON THE SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH PROJECT (SUB 15-0019). The City of
More informationCounty of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report
County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report Agenda Item Number: 55 (This Section for use by Clerk of the Board Only.) Clerk of the Board 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 To: Board of Supervisors
More informationSoutheastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) SEWRPC: Hazard Mitigation Planning
OZAUKEE COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE KICK OFF MEETING February 13, 2018 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) 1960 Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Walworth, Washington,
More informationEast Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel (OCFCD Facility No. C05) from upstream Warner Avenue to downstream Goldenwest Street.
Facility. C05) from upstream Warner Avenue to Lead Agency: Agency: Project Director: Address: Orange County, Public Works, Infrastructure Programs, Capital Programs Sam Ali 300 N. Flower Street Santa Ana
More informationOutcomes. Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Margaret Barondess - MDOT
Eco-Logical: I-75 Corridor I-75 Conservation Transportation Action Planning in to Monroe Achieve County: Multiple Stormwater Environmental Considerations Outcomes Kelly Karll-SEMCOG Karll@semcog.org Margaret
More information