Power2Fuel Conditions for a Business Case P2F in Germany and EU. Dipl. Kfm. Werner Diwald performing energy

Transcription

1 Power2Fuel Conditions for a Business Case P2F in Germany and EU Dipl. Kfm. Werner Diwald performing energy

2 DWV The German Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association (DWV) promotes and prepares the general introduction of hydrogen as an energy carrier in the economy. It supports research and development to contribute to a solution of the future energy problems and the protection of the foundations of our existence. An energy carrier which can be stored and transported will be necessary in future as well. Hydrogen is optimal for this purpose. The German Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association brings experts, companies, research institutes and so on together to let them exchange their experience, contributes to the dissemination of the results and promotes the public interest for the matter. It is therefore a "lobby" for the energy carrier of the future.

3 Challenge Energy Transition Expansion path renewable energy Greenhouse gas emission reduction Target 2050 > 75% Energy consumption in transport sector Redispatch actions in Germany 1 TWH Cutting off 1 Mrd. EUR Costs Electricity Fuels 75% PJ

4 Think Tank - performing energy BeBa. Brandenburgische Technische Universität (BTU) DBI Gas- und Umwelttechnik GmbH (DBI GUT) Deutsche Energieagentur DENA Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.v. (DUH) Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.v. (DLR), ENERTRAG AG Fraunhofer-Institut für Solare Energiesysteme (ISE), hysolutions GmbH Linde AG, Nationale Organisation Wasserstoff und Brennstoffzellentechnologie Siemens AG, TOYOTA AG Total Deutschland GmbH, Vattenfall Europe Innovation GmbH

5 Short-term targets / 1. phase Promotion of technology development of the main components of power2fuel / hydrogen. Development of business cases without subsidaries. Study the impact of the power2fuel system on the renewable market. Support of the cooperation between the industry, research institutes and policy Analysis of the political framework and development of proposals to change the existing framework on EU and German level

6 Integrated Energy System Sector Coupling

7 Transformation process to f-cell % Combustion 203? Registration of new vehicles CO 2 -free ,X % Combustion % electrically Transport / 100% EE 1994 Mercedes NECAR Hydrogen for Mobility

8 PtG Projects in Germany

9 Reduction of GHG Economically efficient and politically acceptable attainment of greenhouse gas reduction aims in transport and mobility sector. Compared to biofuels produced from biomass (corn, yield, sugar cane, rapeseed), hydrogen generated by electrolyses from renewable energy sources (RE- Hydrogen) is not only CO 2 -neutral but CO 2 -free. It s production has no impact on land usage or food prices. green hydrogen is intended to be supplied to refineries to replace hydrogen made from a steam methane reforming process (SMR). The GHG intensity of hydrogen made from SMR is about 10 t CO 2 /t of hydrogen. In total, this could amount to approx. 20 million to. CO2 emission reduction in the EU annually.

10 Environmental Impact Hydrogen vs. Biofuel In 2020 at least 10 % of the final consumption of energy in the transport sector is supposed to be derived from Biofuels by European law Biofuel-path: Power-based-Fuels-path: With biofuels produced with biomass, km 2 new cultivated area would be needed to reach that goal. (This is twice the size of a Country like Belgium.) Thereby (depending on cultivation methods) 56 mio. tons of CO 2 would be released. This equates the emission of12-26 mio. vehicles*. *) Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) With RE-Hydrogen wind energy plants (3 MW) were necessary to achieve the 10 %. These plants needed an area of appr. 66 km 2 (0,9 Ha each).* Thereby hardly any additional CO 2 would be released. *) All over Europe MW electrolysis would be necessary, to cover the total demand (3.000 full load hours provided). The land requirements with the Power-based-Fuels-Path is only appr. 0,01% compared to the Biofuels-Path. At the same time greenhouse gas emissions (farming, harvesting, processing) are reduced up to 90%.

11 Benchmarking GHG Reduction Costs Green Hydrogen vs. RME 64 Mio. Nm³/a 60 /MWhel 80 /MWhel 100 /MWhel Cost H2 bei h/a Mio. /a Cost H2 bei h/a Mio. /a THG-Reduction t/a Replacement FAME TJ/a Reduction of cost FAME Mio. /a Reduction fossil Hydrogen Mio. /a Cost reduction bei h/a Mio. /a Cost reduction bei h/a Mio. /a

12 Short Time Market potential Electrolyser capacity for 3.5% reduction of GHG! In the same time x MW less loading in the energy system! Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to Electrolyzer capacity requirements by h/a to 10 Mio. to fuel production: Schwechat, AU Burgas, BG PCK Schwedt, DE H2-1MK 11 MW 26 MW 39 MW 52 MW 65 MW 78 MW 91 MW 104 MW 117 MW 130 MW MW MW Total county production capacity: Germany 120 Mio. to Italy 116 Mio. to France 91 Mio to GB 88 Mio. to Poland 25 Mio. to

13 Power2Fuels: Advantages Economically efficient and politically acceptable attainment of greenhouse gas reduction aims in transport and mobility sector Establishing a transition to a flexible power supply sector (Demand-Side-Management) Increasing added value, job creation Stabilisation of business location Europe Support of innovative refinery-concepts Reduction of gas-imports

14 Current legal framework EU-Directive 2009/28/EG & 2009/30/EG : New FQD, Sep 15th 2015: - RED: Double-counting of hydrogen (energy content) - FQD: Commitment of 6% reduction of greenhouse gas towards reference value of 84 g/mj CO 2 The amendment includes the consideration of renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin (energy content comes from renewable energy sources other than biomass) that are processed together with fossil fuels. The EU Fuel Quality Directive allows to offset reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from projects upstream (these creditable reductions are referred to as "Upstream Emission Reductions" [UER]) or through admixtures of biofuels onto the European goals to the reductions the emissions of fuels which deliver into the market. But EU Legal Service is the opinion especially the reduction of emissions through Green Hydrogen by UER-System is not allowable. Understandable reasons for that opinion are not given!

15 Environment activists against hydrogen GUIDANCE NOTE on approaches to quantify, verify, validate, monitor and report upstream emission reductions 3.3 Eligibility of UERs Any facility or infrastructure in the supply chain prior to the facility at which the finished transport fuel is produced may be eligible to report upstream emission reductions. For fuels with crude oil as a raw material, this includes all of the supply chain prior to the refinery. Reductions in the greenhouse gas emissions in the production of hydrogen to be used in the production of fuel in refineries cannot be considered upstream emissions reductions for the purpose of Council Directive 2015/652 irrespective of where the hydrogen is physically produced. Hydrogen are selective discriminate by DG Climate!!

16 Working Program 2017: - Clear position, that only Wind and PV power can be use in the electrolyser to produce green Hydrogen. - Lobbing, that green hydrogen will be approved to reduce the GHG-Emission in refineries. - EU entitle in particular green hydrogen as a advance fuel to fulfil the emission targets in the transport sector.

17