EVALUATION OF CERAMNIC MBR TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER REUSE. Abstract. Introduction
|
|
- Sabina Holland
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EVALUATION OF CERAMNIC MBR TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER REUSE James F. DeCarolis, P.E., Black & Veatch, 300 Rancheros Drive, Suite 250, San Marcos, CA, 92069, Ph: Scott Freeman, P.E., Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO. Gary Hunter, P.E., Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO. Bikram Sabherwal, Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO. Sock-Hoon Koh, Black & Veatch, Singapore. Sandeep Sathyamoorthy, Black & Veatch, Walnut Creek, CA. Abstract An 8-week demonstration test of the Meiden Ceramic Flat Sheet (CFM) MBR is ongoing at the City of Escondido s Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility (HARRF) located in Escondido, California. The primary goal of the testing is to demonstrate the CFM membrane can meet filtration requirements (i.e. Title 22 Filtration Requirements) of the CDPH (now Division of Drinking Water) Water Recycling Criteria. This paper presents membrane operational and water quality performance data collected over a 30 day reporting period. Introduction The use of ceramic membranes for water reuse is relatively new in comparison to the long history and experience with the evaluation/implementation of polymeric based membrane systems for various reuse applications (Freeman et al., 2008; Adham & DeCarolis 2004; DeCarolis et al., 2009). In general, ceramic membranes have several advantageous properties when compared to polymeric membranes. Such properties include higher mechanical stability (allowing higher pressures), relatively narrow membrane pore size distribution, high chemical stability (resulting in longer membrane life and lower fiber breakage). In the past few years, Meidensha Corporation (Meidensha), Tokyo, Japan, has incorporated their ceramic flat-sheet membrane (CFM) into a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) configuration. In 2013, Meiden Singapore (fully owned subsidy of Meidensha) began operation and testing of 1 MGD capacity MBR demonstration plant using the CFM technology at the Jurong Water Reclamation Plant (located in Singapore) which treats both municipal and industrial wastewater. Results of the demonstration testing showed the Meiden MBR could treat industrial water and produce a high quality effluent that can be reused for industrial uses after being blended with MBR permeate produced from municipal wastewater (Kekre et al., 2015). Black & Veatch is conducting demonstration testing of the CFM MBR treating municipal wastewater. The primary goal of the testing is to demonstrate the CFM membrane meets filtration requirements (i.e. Title 22 Filtration Requirements) of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, now called Division of Drinking Water, DDW) Water Recycling Criteria under the Title 22 Code of Regulations which requires turbidity of: 0.2 NTU 95% of the time within 24 hours; 1
2 0.5 NTU 100% of the time (CDPH 2013, 2014). The City of Escondido (City), California is sponsoring the demonstration testing of CFM technology. Testing of the CFM membrane is being done using a MBR pilot system, which is currently operated on primary effluent from the City s municipal wastewater treatment plant (i.e. Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility-HARRF). This paper presents initial operational and water quality performance data from the on-going demonstration testing of the Meiden Ceramic MBR, which began steady-state operation in September The paper is organized as follows: Introduction Demonstration Study Objectives Materials and Methods MBR Performance Monitoring Results Next Steps Summary Acknowledgments Demonstration Study Objectives The main objective of the Meiden MBR demonstration study is to evaluate the ability of the Meiden CFM membrane to comply with filtration performance requirements per California s Title 22, Section The overall study objectives are being achieved by operating a pilot system on primary wastewater effluent produced at the City s HARRF. Specific study objectives include: Demonstrate the CFM membrane can meet Title 22 turbidity requirements via continuous online filtrate turbidity monitoring; Collect operational performance data from the CFM membrane including membrane fouling performance and air scouring requirements; Evaluate water quality performance of the MBR system via the implementation of detailed sampling plan; Demonstrate the Meiden CFM MBR can achieve minimum 1 log (90%) removal of seeded virus at the 50th percentile; Assess effectiveness of manufacturer recommended membrane cleaning protocols. 2
3 Materials and Methods Pilot Testing Site The pilot testing site for this study is HARRF, located in Escondido, California. HARRF is designed to treat 36 mgd, which is two times the permitted monthly average discharge flow of 18 mgd. HARRF receives municipal wastewater from the City of Escondido and the Rancho Bernardo community located in the City of San Diego. The main wastewater treatment process at HARRF consists of conventional activated sludge (CAS) and includes mechanical and bar screens, grit removal system, primary clarifiers; aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, flocculation basins, DynaSand filters, UV and chlorine disinfection. The solids handling process includes: DAF thickeners, anaerobic digesters, solids dewatering centrifuges, and an energy recovery system. Several chemicals are dosed throughout the main treatment process as summarized in Table 1. As indicated, the plant periodically practices chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT), which utilizes coagulant and polymer addition. During the pilot study, the use of CEPT will be tracked to evaluate the impact (if any) on the MBR pilot performance. The pilot system is located on a concrete test pad located at HARRF. The site provides sufficient influent water supply, electrical power, compressed air, and drainage lines to meet the needs of the pilot testing. During the pilot period, the MBR system will be operated with primary effluent. Primary effluent quality from samples collected between as provided by the City is presented in Table 2. Table 1 HARRF Chemical Dosing Locations DOSING LOCATION CHEMICAL PURPOSE TYPICAL DOSE, MG/L Grit Chamber Inlet Ferric Sulfate Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment 0-15 (as Fe 2 S0 4 ) Primary Clarifiers Polydyne, Clarifloc WE 1024 Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment Tertiary Filter Inlet Polydyne, Clarifloc WE 850 Improve Filter Performance Tertiary Filter Inlet Polydyne, Clarifloc WE 888 Improve Filter Performance 1-2 3
4 Table 2 HARRF Primary Effluent Quality PARAMETER UNITS TYPICAL MIN MAX Alkalinity mg/l as CaCO CBOD mg/l TSS mg/l VSS mg/l TDS mg/l TKN mg/l as N Ammonia mg/l as N Description of Pilot Plant Pilot Meiden and Fluidyne Corporation (Cedar Falls, Iowa) jointly provided the components of the MBR pilot system. The MBR pilot system includes a 2-mm static fine screen, 19,000 gallon MBR tank, 500 gallon clean water tank, and a 300 gallon chemical tank. The MBR tank consists of five separate chambers: anaerobic #1 (3,004 gallons), anaerobic #2 (2,337 gallons), anoxic (5,341 gallons) aerobic (5,341 gallons) and membrane (3,004 gallons). The system was designed for an average filtrate flow of 22 gpm and peak flow of 33 gpm. The overall biological system prior to the membranes utilizes a Fluidyne Integrated Surge Anoxic Mix (ISAM ) System. Typically, ISAM systems utilize a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) in conjunction with dual anaerobic zones and a Surge Anoxic Mix (SAM) tank. For the MBR pilot system, the SBR tank is operated in continuous mode and serve as the aerobic tank. A basic flow schematic of the Meiden/Fluidyne MBR pilot system is provided in Figure 1. 4
5 Figure 1 Schematic of the Meiden MBR Pilot System Primary effluent is pumped to the fine screen and flows via gravity into the first anaerobic chamber. The clarified liquid and any decomposed products then pass into the second anaerobic chamber for further processing prior to passing through an underflow into the anoxic reactor. Mixed liquor from the anoxic chamber is pumped to the aerobic zone using a jet motive / recycle pump. The speed of the pump is controlled by the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration measured in the aerobic chamber. Nitrate rich mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) from the aerobic zone is returned by gravity flow to the anoxic chamber for rapid denitrification. The system also allows controlled recirculation of MLSS from the anoxic tank (using manual valves off the jet / motive pump) to the anaerobic chambers to further enhance denitrification. Lastly, MLSS from the aerobic/anoxic tank enters the membrane tank via a recycled line and is returned to the aerobic tank via an underflow. Sludge wasting is conducted manually from the membrane tank and monitored by the PLC after receiving output from the MLSS sensor submerged in the membrane chamber. The system design also allows manual wasting from the anaerobic Tank #1. The membrane chamber is equipped with a dual stacked membrane unit, containing 300 full-size membrane elements for a total membrane area of approximately 1,614 ft 2. The Meiden membranes operate with an outside-in flow path and have a pore size of 0.1 µm. General specifications for the Meiden Ceramic Flat-sheet unit are provided in Table 3. A photograph of the unit being installed into the membrane chamber of the MBR tank is provided in Figure 2. 5
6 Table 3 Specifications of the Meiden Ceramic Flat Sheet Membrane Unit PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Commercial Designation CH TM100-U2DJ Unit Configuration Level stack Number of Elements # Membrane Type Flat-Sheet Approximate size of element (LXWXH) mm 261X6X1046 Nominal Pore Size (micron) micron 0.1 Membrane Material Alumina Active Membrane Area per element ft2 5.4 Maximum Backwash Pressure psi 8.7 Maximum Trans-membrane Pressure psi 8.7 Maximum Temperature C 60 Operating ph Note: 300 membrane elements were installed in pilot system 6
7 Figure 2 Photograph of the Meiden Ceramic Membrane Unit during Installation Pilot Plant Operating Conditions Preliminary target steady-state operating conditions identified at the onset of the demonstration study by Meiden are provided in Table 4 below. As shown the membrane system is designed to operate with periodic back-pulse or relaxation to mitigate membrane fouling and an average flux rate of 19.6 gfd. The biological component of the Meiden MBR was designed for a MLSS in the membrane chamber of 8,000 to 10,000 mg/l and overall solids retention time (SRT) of 30 days. 7
8 Table 4 Specifications of the Meiden Ceramic Flat Sheet Membrane Unit PARAMETER UNITS VALUE Total HRT hours 14.4 Aerobic + Anoxic HRT hours = 8.08 SRT Days 30 MLSS mg/l 8,000-10,000 Average Flux gfd 19.6 Filtration Cycle Min 9 Backwash/Relaxation Duration Sec 30 Operational & Water Quality Performance Monitoring Approach The overall approach to meeting the demonstration study objectives is to operate the Meiden MBR system on a continuous basis using primary effluent from the HARRF as the feed wastewater source for a target 60 day steady-state operating period. During this time, monitoring of operational and water quality parameters is being conducted. Examples of various operational parameters being collected over the course of the demonstration period include flows (influent, membrane backwash, membrane filtrate, internal recycle pump speed), pressures (filtrate pressure before/ backwash/relaxation and membrane cleaning), MLSS, temperature, DO, ORP, tank levels, membrane air scour flow rate, backwash/relaxation durations. The performance of the membrane system component of the MBR is being evaluated by tracking the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and temperature corrected specific flux during constant flux operation and during peak flux test conditions. Water quality samples from various locations in the MBR process are being collected and analyzed on a routine basis to assess the performance of the both the biological and membrane components of the MBR system. A key focus of the study is to demonstrate the ability of the Meiden MBR to meet the Title 22 recycled water turbidity requirements through the use of continuous online turbidity monitoring of the MBR filtrate. Other water quality parameters being monitored are categorized as follows particulate (turbidity, TSS), nutrients (inorganic nitrogen, including ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, TKN, orthophosphate, total phosphorus), organics (BOD, COD, TOC) and microbial constituents (fecal coliform, total coliform, total coliphage). Water quality samples being measured by off-site laboratories are in accordance to methods listed in the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (SM), United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the American Public Health Association (APHA). Specific laboratories to be used throughout the project include the City of Escondido Water Quality Laboratory, Eurofins-Calscience, and Biovir Laboratories. Membrane cleaning is being performed per manufacturer recommended cleaning protocols after observing a significant increase of TMP (or corresponding decrease in temperature corrected 8
9 specific flux). The pilot system is designed to perform a cleaning automatically based on a set point increase of TMP, via set point frequency or manually initiated. Maintenance clean (MC) is typically carried out by gradual dosing of chlorine and acid (if required) through the membranes at manufacturer s recommended chemical concentration. During the demonstration study cleaning is performed with sodium hypochlorite at a target concentration of 0.1% w/w followed be a low ph cleaning using citric acid at target concentration of 0.5% citric acid. MBR Performance Monitoring Results Membrane Operational Performance Monitoring The performance data from the Meiden CFM MBR monitored over the reporting period of 10/3/15 to 11/4/15 is provided in Figure 3. During this period the system was operated with a target flux of 24.5 gfd. Back pulsing using MBR filtrate (with no chemical addition) was performed every 9 minutes for duration of 30 seconds. The backwash flow rate was approximately 2 times the filtration flow rate. Starting on 10/6/15 the system operated with little to no membrane fouling (based on the minimal change in TMP/specific flux) for a 2 week period at a target operating flux of 24.5 gfd. At the end of this period, the TMP increased sharply (approximately 2 psi) at which time an MC was performed using sodium hypochlorite. The MC was effective at reducing the TMP to the initial value and the system operated for approximately 5 days with little to no membrane fouling. After this time, the TMP started increasing steadily requiring another MC to be performed on 10/30/15. Following this MC, the system only operated for a short period (approximately 1 day) before a sharp increase in TMP was observed. Following this event, another MC was performed on 11/2/15 using sodium hypochlorite; however, it was not effective at completely restoring membrane productivity. As a precautionary measure, the flux was reduced to a target value of 16 gfd on 11/3/15 to allow time to investigate the cause of membrane fouling. Shortly after this time, a MC (not shown on Figure 3) was performed with sodium hypochlorite followed by citric acid. The results showed the citric acid was effective at reducing the TMP to initial values. This data suggests membrane fouling was due to build of inorganic foulants on the membranes. The exact cause of the fouling is currently under investigation. A potential cause is the use of ferric sulfate added in the CEPT process at HARRF. 9
10 Figure 3 Membrane Performance of the Meiden CFM MBR 10
11 Water Quality Performance Monitoring Water quality performance results of the Meiden MBR system collected over the reporting period including particulate (turbidity), organic (BOD/COD), inorganic nitrogen (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite) and microbial (total coliform, fecal coliform) constituents are provided in Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 respectively. Figure 4 shows the Meiden CFM MBR is consistently meeting the Title 22 Recycled Water Criteria for membrane filtration with an average filtrate turbidity measured via online monitoring of 0.12 NTU. It was observed during the testing the turbidity measured by the online analyzer spiked following the performance of MC, however further investigation showed the spikes were due to residual cleaning solution in the filtrate piping and not the performance of the membrane. Figure 5 shows the influent wastewater BOD5 and COD values ranged from 163 mg/l to 300 mg/l and 274 mg/l to 555 mg/l, respectively over the reporting period. The BOD5 values measured in the MBR filtrate were < 2 mg/l and COD values measured in the MBR filtrate ranged from 3 21 mg/l, indicating the Meiden MBR achieved a high degree of organic removal. Figure 6 shows the inorganic nitrogen results including ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite measured in the influent wastewater and Meiden CFM MBR filtrate. The results show the ammonia and nitrite values measured in the MBR filtrate were all below the method reporting limit (MRL) indicating the system was fully nitrifying. The nitrate values measured in the MBR filtrate ranged from mg/l-n indicating partial denitrification was achieved. This data indicates that denitrification could have been inhibited during the testing. Possible causes, currently under investigation, include carry over of dissolved oxygen (DO) present in the recycle streams to the anoxic chamber and the amount of available readily biodegradable COD. Figure 7 shows the results of the total coliform and fecal coliform analyses conducted on the Meiden CFM MBR system over the reporting period. Results showed the coliform concentration measured in the MBR filtrate were all below the method detection limit (MDL) of 2.2 MPN/100 ml. Based on the reported influent concentration the system achieved > 6 log removal of total and fecal coliform. 11
12 Figure 4 Turbidity Removal by the Meiden CFM MBR Figure 5 BOD/COD Removal by the Meiden CFM MBR 12
13 Figure 6 Inorganic Nitrogen Removal by the Meiden CFM MBR 13
14 Figure 7 Coliform Removal by the Meiden CFM MBR Next Steps Summary An 8-week demonstration test of the Meiden CFM MBR is ongoing at the City of Escondido s Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility (HARRF) located in Escondido, California. The primary goal of the testing is to demonstrate the CFM membrane can meet filtration requirements (i.e. Title 22 Filtration Requirements) of the CDPH (now Division of Drinking Water) Water Recycling Criteria under the Title 22 Code of Regulations as follows: 0.2 NTU 95% of the time within 24 hours; 0.5 NTU 100% of the time (CDPH 2013, 2014). Online turbidity monitoring results collected over a 30 day period has shown the CFM membrane consistently meets the above requirements with an average filtrate turbidity measured over this time of 0.12 NTU. During the testing period, the Meiden MBR operated at a target flux of 24.5 gfd with maintenance cleans conducted at intervals ranging from of approximately every 3 to 8 days. In general maintenance cleaning using sodium hypochlorite only throughout the test 14
15 period was effective at restoring membrane productivity; however, toward the end of the test period significant increase in TMP required cleaning with citric acid. In addition to the turbidity performance outlined above, water quality performance monitoring results showed the Meiden MBR achieved high quality filtrate quality with respect to organic (average BOD < 2 mg/l; average COD = 14 mg/l), inorganic nitrogen (average ammonia < 0.5 mg/l-n; average nitrate = 13 mg/l-n; average nitrite < 0.05 mg/l-n) and microbial contaminants (total and fecal coliform < 2 MPN/100 ml). Upon completion of the demonstration testing the remaining data generated from the study will be summarized in a final report and presented to the Division of Drinking Water (DDW). At this time, the project team will request DDW to provide conditional approval of the Meiden CFM membrane to meet Title 22 membrane filtration requirements. Additional testing of the Meiden MBR is being planned at HARRF to evaluate the long term performance of the CFM membrane. The system is also intended to be used as pretreatment to other advanced technologies (e.g. reverse osmosis, advanced oxidation) that the City of Escondido plans on demonstrating as part of their ongoing potable reuse program (City of Escondido, 2014). References Adham, S., DeCarolis, J., Optimization of Various MBR Systems for Water Reclamation Phase III. Final Report, Agreement No. 01-FC United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. CDPH, Alternative Treatment Technology Report for Recycled Water, October CDPH, Titles 22 and 17 California Code of Regulations California Department of Public Health s Recycled Water Regulations. Last Updated June 18, City of Escondido, 2014: Potable Reuse Program Task 1: Feasibility Study prepared by Black & Veatch and Brown and Caldwell. DeCarolis, J., Hirani, Z., Adham, S., 2009 Evaluation of Newly Developed Membrane Bioreactor Systems for Water Reclamation Phase 4 Final Report, Project No. 01-FC United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Freeman, S., Bates, J., Wallis-Lage, C., Mcevoy., J. (2008), Drought relief in South East, Queensland, Australia, provided by membrane-reclaimed water, Journal AWWA 100:2, international issue, February Kekre, K., Ang, W.S., Niwa, T., Yamashita, T., Shiota., H., Noguchi., H., 2015 Production of Industrial Grade Water for Reuse from Industrial Used Water using UASB+CMBR Process, presented at WEFTEC 2015, 88th Annual Technical Exhibition & Conference, September 26 30, 2015, McCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 15
16 Acknowledgments The authors of this paper would like to acknowledge the following groups and individuals for their contribution to the success of the project. California Division of Drinking Water, Recycled Water Division, lead by Randy Bernard, for reviewing the demonstration test protocol. Meiden America including: Nobunari Onishi, Bill Pagels, and Noriaki Kanamori for providing and coordinating the installation and startup of the demonstration testing pilot equipment, and providing technical and field support during the testing period. Fluidyne for design and construction of the MBR pilot system. B&V Operations & Data Management Team including: Ahmed Hussein, Osai Robinson and Maddie Ramus. City of Escondido Public Utilities Department, Director of Utilities Christopher McKinney, for sponsoring the Meiden CFM membrane Title 22 Demonstration Testing City of Escondido Water Quality Lab, Laboratory Superintendent Vasana Vipatapat and her staff, for providing analytical support and sample analysis. HARRF Operations Staff including: Jim Larzalere and John Delfante for assisting with the siting of the pilot equipment and providing HARRF operational and water quality data. 16
APPLICATION OF FLAT SHEET CERAMIC MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER REUSE. Abstract. Introduction
APPLICATION OF FLAT SHEET CERAMIC MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER REUSE James F. DeCarolis, P.E., Black & Veatch, 300 Rancheros Drive, Suite 250, San Marcos, CA, 92069, decarolisjf@bv.com, Ph: 619-204-2537
More informationW O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W
Facility Overview The recently upgraded and expanded Henry N. Wochholz Regional Water Reclamation Facility (WRWRF) treats domestic wastewater generated from the Yucaipa-Calimesa service area. The WRWRF
More informationBEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary
BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND Brett T. Messner, PE, Tetra Tech, Inc., 201 E Pine St, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL 32801 Brett.Messner@tetratech.com, Ph: 239-851-1225 Fred
More informationEvaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors
Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors Short Course on Membrane Bioreactors 3/22/06 R. Shane Trussell, Ph.D., P.E. shane@trusselltech.com Outline Introduction Process
More informationAppendix D JWPCP Background and NDN
Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN JWPCP Background JWPCP Water Quality Primary Clarifiers HPO Reactors Final Clarifiers Unit Influent Primary Effluent Secondary Effluent BOD mg/l 460 240
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE AquaMB PROCESS Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc. Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. 6306 N. Alpine Road Rockford, IL 61111 Copyright 2003 Aqua-Aerobic
More informationMembrane BioReactor: Technology for Waste Water Reclamation
Membrane BioReactor: Technology for Waste Water Reclamation Sachin Malekar - Senior Manager, Technology & Nilesh Tantak - Executive, Technology Ion Exchange (India) Ltd. BACKGROUND Due to diminishing water
More informationEVALUATION OF NEWLY DEVELOPED MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS FOR WASTEWATER RECLAMATION
EVALUATION OF NEWLY DEVELOPED MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS FOR WASTEWATER RECLAMATION ABSTRACT Zakir Hirani 1, James DeCarolis 1, Samer Adham 1, Larry Wasserman 2 1 MWH, 31 North Lake Ave, Suite 12, Pasadena,
More informationReclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology
Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology By Mark Wilf, Ph. D., Graeme Pearce Ph. D., of Hydranautics, Oceanside, CA, and Julie Allam MSc., Javier
More informationOperation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse
Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse K. Azis, Ch. Vardalachakis, P. Melidis and S. Ntougias Laboratory of Wastewater Management and Treatment Technologies, Department of Environmental
More informationISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX
ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX P r o v e n T e c h n o l o g y FLUIDYNE S ISAM IS A TOTAL TREATMENT SYSTEM incorporating BOD, TSS and nitrogen removal along with sludge reduction in an integrated system.
More informationWastewater treatment objecives
Wastewater treatment objecives Removal of suspended and floatable materials Degradation of biodegradable organics Removal of nutrients Elimination of priority pollutants Elimination of pathogenic organisms
More informationMembrane Systems. Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes
Membrane Systems Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes Aqua-Aerobic Membrane Systems Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes For nearly 50 years, Aqua-Aerobic Systems has provided thousands of customers with adaptive
More informationWASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:
Mission: The mission of the Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Utility and staff is to protect public health and the environment through the effective treatment of wastewater. Effective wastewater treatment
More informationCOST TRENDS OF MBR SYSTEMS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
COST TRENDS OF MBR SYSTEMS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT James DeCarolis*, Samer Adham **, William R. Pearce***, Zakir Hirani**, Stephen Lacy**, Roger Stephenson** *MWH Americas, Inc. 9444 Farnham
More informationMEMBRANE BIOREACTORS (MBR) AND REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO) FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT. Abstract
MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS (MBR) AND REVERSE OSMOSIS (RO) FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT Kevin D. Torrens, BCEEM, Brown and Caldwell, 2 Park Way, Suite 2A, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458 KTorrens@Brwncald.com, Ph: 201-574-4700
More informationSulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project
Water Technologies & Solutions technical paper Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project background In May 2001, a consortium including Mohammed Abdulmohsin Al-Kharafi and Sons (The Kharafi
More informationEVALUATION OF MF/UF CHEMICAL CLEANING STRATEGIES IN DIRECT POTABLE REUSE APPLICATIONS. Introduction
EVALUATION OF MF/UF CHEMICAL CLEANING STRATEGIES IN DIRECT POTABLE REUSE APPLICATIONS Chelsea M. Francis, Arcadis, 401 E Main Dr Suite 400 El Paso, TX, 79901 E-mail: chelsea.francis@arcadis.com Phone:
More informationInland Empire Utilities Agency Carollo Engineers, Inc. CH2M HILL
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IEUA Wastewater Facilities Master Plan TM 8 CCWRF Future Plans PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Inland Empire Utilities Agency Carollo Engineers, Inc. CH2M HILL DATE: October
More informationAqua-Aerobic MBR Topics
Aqua-Aerobic MBR Topics Aqua-Aerobic Systems KMS Partnership Traditional MBR Approach Aqua-Aerobic Time-managed Biological Approach Bioreactor Operation & Membrane Integration Traditional Membrane Issues
More informationPreparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant
Summer Seminar Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant Rajendra P. Bhattarai, P.E., BCEE Austin Water Utility Ana J. Peña-Tijerina, Ph.D.,
More informationCORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
ISAM SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR PROCESS TRUST FLUIDYNE S EXPERIENCE The Fluidyne ISAM Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) system incorporates the latest and most innovative technology and over three decades of
More informationMEMBRANE BIO-REACTOR. Prashanth N 1 1. INTRODUCION
International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology Vol.(7)Issue(3), pp. 296 301 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21172/1.73.540 e ISSN:2278 621X MEMBRANE BIO-REACTOR Prashanth N 1 ABSTRACT:
More informationSECTION 2.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
SECTION 2.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Analytical Environmental Services 2-1 Jamul Indian Village Wastewater Treatment Plant Analytical Environmental Services 2-2 Jamul
More informationCOMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL
COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL Alvin C. Firmin CDM Jefferson Mill, 670 North Commercial Street Suite 201 Manchester, New Hampshire 03101 ABSTRACT Sequencing
More informationPost-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010
Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP by: William Leaf Adrienne Menniti Bruce Johnson CH2M HILL, Inc. Clint Dolsby Tracy Crane City of Meridian October 26, 21
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF AN INTERMITTENTLY AERATED AND FED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
OPTIMIZATION OF AN INTERMITTENTLY AERATED AND FED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR P. MELIDIS, S. NTOUGIAS, V. VASILATOU, V. DIAMANTIS and A. ALEXANDRIDIS Laboratory of Wastewater Management and Treatment
More informationCharacteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors
The 2 nd MBR workshop at Hokkaido University Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors Prof. Hang-Sik Shin Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Korea Advanced Institute
More informationCORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
ISAM SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR PROCESS TRUST FLUIDYNE S EXPERIENCE The Fluidyne ISAM Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) system incorporates the latest and most innovative technology and over two decades of
More informationThere Is Another Flat Plate MBR
There Is Another Flat Plate MBR Evaluation of Huber's VRM Membrane Bioreactor Technology Henryk Melcer Background VRM Technology Pilot plant Review of Investigation Preliminary conclusions Outline Membrane
More informationDr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents
Feedback from a metal processing industry MBR Plant in its 3rd Year of Operation:- An Analysis of the Flux, Effluent Quality and Membrane Lifetime Data to date Authors: Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz
More informationRE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES
RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES GRANT WEAVER, PE & WASTEWATER OPERATOR WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION WISCONSIN DELLS, WI OCTOBER
More informationApplication of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater
Application of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater P. Damala, E. Katsou, J. Novakovic, K. Chatzikonstantinou, G. Karathanasi, A. Patsia, S. Malamis International Conference on Industrial Waste
More informationFURTHER EXPANDED FLOWS AND LOADS R3 INDUSTRIAL WWTP PROCESS ENGINEERING EVALUATION
FURTHER EXPANDED FLOWS AND LOADS R3 INDUSTRIAL WWTP PROCESS ENGINEERING EVALUATION Prepared For: HyLife Foods Neepawa, Manitoba, Canada Prepared By: Pharmer Engineering 1998 West Judith Lane Boise, ID
More informationCommissioning and Operation of a 50 mgd Ultrafiltration Advanced Reclamation Facility for Gwinnett County, Georgia
Commissioning and Operation of a 50 mgd Ultrafiltration Advanced Reclamation Facility for Gwinnett County, Georgia ABSTRACT Robert A. Bergman*, Richard Porter**, Don Joffe***, Ed Minchew**** * CH2M HILL
More informationCan MBR Eliminate Additional Disinfection? A Case Study. Ufuk Erdal, PhD, PE, CH2M Jonathan Vorheis, PE, CH2M July 17, 2015
Can MBR Eliminate Additional Disinfection? A Case Study Ufuk Erdal, PhD, PE, CH2M Jonathan Vorheis, PE, CH2M July 17, 2015 2 Acknowledgement We sincerely thank to co-authors for their valuable contribution
More informationPresentation Outline
Presentation Outline Nitrification/denitrification refresher Treatment technologies available for nitrification and BNR/ENR What is the problem? BNR/ENR VPDES permitting Causes of reduced BNR performance
More informationBasic Design Concepts of MBR
Basic Design Concepts of MBR Class III & Class IV OTCO Workshop Wednesday August 15, 2007 Terry M. Gellner, P.E CT Consultants, Inc Outline Types of Membranes MBR WWTP and General Sizing Criteria Common
More informationAir Connection on Rack. Filtrate Connection on Rack
What is a membrane? Module with Flow holes Air Connection on Rack Filtrate Connection on Rack 1 module 1rack Goal is to use membranes to separate or filter solids, organisms, and molecules from the liquid
More informationProducing High-Purity Recycled Water for Industrial Applications with Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis: Lessons Learned
Producing High-Purity Recycled Water for Industrial Applications with Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis: Lessons Learned ABSTRACT Mallika Ramanathan*, Alicia Cohn*, John Hake*, Ken Abraham**, Srinivas
More informationMembrane Thickening Aerobic Digestion Processes
Membrane Thickening Aerobic Digestion Processes 2013 NESOWEA Operator Seminar Bryen Woo, PE Membrane Thickening Digestion Aerobic digestion process using a Flat Sheet Membrane Unit Ideal for: Facilities
More informationThe Effect of Organic Loading on Membrane Fouling in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Treating Municipal Wastewater
The Effect of Organic Loading on Membrane Fouling in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Treating Municipal Wastewater R. Shane Trussell, P.E., Rion P. Merlo, Slawomir W. Hermanowicz,, and David Jenkins Department
More informationDave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.
Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc. Overview Wisconsin phosphorus regulatory update Big Bend Facilities Plan Phosphorus removal alternatives and evaluation Alternative recommendation Phosphorus Rules
More informationDave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.
Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc. Overview Wisconsin phosphorus regulatory update Big Bend Facilities Plan Phosphorus removal alternatives and evaluation Alternative recommendation Phosphorus Rules
More informationTreatability Study and Reverse Osmosis Pilot Study of Industrial Wastewater at a Wood Products Mill
Treatability Study and Reverse Osmosis Pilot Study of Industrial Wastewater at a Wood Products Mill NC AWWA-WEA 2017 Annual Conference Randall Foulke, PE, BCEE, LEED AP Tracey Daniels, EI November 14,
More informationUse of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater
Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater OWEA Plant Operations and Lab Analysis Workshop W. James Gellner Outline Introduction / Problem Overview Plant Issues Biowin Overview
More informationSevern Trent Services Wastewater Solutions End-to-End Wastewater Treatment Solutions
Severn Trent Services Wastewater Solutions End-to-End Wastewater Treatment Solutions 999C1310EU.2 MAY/09 Complete Solutions for Wastewater Treatment Severn Trent Services, one of the UK s leading suppliers
More informationMEMBRANE BIOREACTOR NIHAR DOCTOR. Director
TM MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR NIHAR DOCTOR Director en-vısı n Enviro Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Pollution Control Consultants & Engineers) Shree Ram Complex, 2 nd Floor, Above Bank Of India, Near Kargil Chowk, Surat
More informationENHANCED MEMBRANE CLEANING WITH REDUCING AGENTS TO REMOVE IRON FOULING. Introduction
ENHANCED MEMBRANE CLEANING WITH REDUCING AGENTS TO REMOVE IRON FOULING Korkud Egrican, P.E.*, James C. Lozier, P.E., Srinivas Jalla, P.E.; CH2M J.C. Lan, Robert L. Harris, Jr., Brandon Brown; Gwinnett
More informationComparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity
CSWEA 2013 Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity Don Esping, Denny Parker, Jose Jimenez, Fenghua Yang, Tim Bate, Steve Arant May 16 2013 Milwaukee MSD South
More informationEVW 2 Hynds Commercial Wastewater Systems April 2013
Hynds Commercial Wastewater Systems High quality sewage treatment systems Fully designed by qualified engineers Small footprint EVW 2 Hynds Commercial Wastewater Systems April 2013 0800 425 433 www.hyndsenv.co.nz
More informationIs membrane filtration worth it?
Is membrane filtration worth it? A case study of 3 municipal MBR s in Michigan and their operational experiences. Joe Hebert - Ottawa County Public Utilities 1 Who are these MBR s? North Kent Sewer Authority,
More informationUPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM
UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM T. Masterson, J. Federico, G. Hedman, S. Duerr BETA Group, Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place Lincoln, Rhode Island 02865 ABSTRACT The Westerly,
More informationCity of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:
FACILITY: City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant LOCATION: Redlands, CA GEO. AREA: Southern California STATUS 07/14: Operational CONSTRUCTION: ENGINEERING: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER:
More informationCOMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES
Sixteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC 16 2012, Istanbul, Turkey 1 COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL
More informationMEMBRANE BIOREACTORS FOR RO PRETREATMENT
ABSTRACT MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS FOR RO PRETREATMENT Simon Dukes, Antonia von Gottberg Koch Membrane Systems, 850 Main Street, Wilmington, MA 01887 Currently, treated municipal wastewater is typically discharged
More informationPLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?
PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW? LEONARD E. RIPLEY, PH.D., P.E., BCEE SENIOR PROCESS ENGINEER FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. General Action Categories 1. Collect wastewater characterization
More informationMeeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals
Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals June 5, 2017 Agenda SB1 requirements for P TP removal mechanisms Biological removal Chemical removal SB No. 1 Requirements for Phosphorus ** WWTP /
More informationInnovating Water Treatment Technologies in Managing Water-Energy Demand
Innovating Water Treatment Technologies in Managing Water-Energy Demand L.Y. Lee, S.L. Ong, J.Y. Hu and H.Y. Ng Centre for Water Research, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering; NUS Environmental
More informationA COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF CLOTH FILTER MEDIA APPLIED IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF CLOTH FILTER MEDIA APPLIED IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT Hui Lin, P.E., Matthew Castillo, Lloyd W. Johnson, P.E., MPD Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc., 6306
More informationOPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
XCG File No.: 3-167-09-02 October 26, 2016 OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Prepared for: B.M. ROSS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 62 North Street Goderich, Ontario N7A 2T4 Prepared
More informationAquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.
PHASED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM PHASED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM Aqua-Aerobic Systems has led the industry in time-managed, biological technology since 1984. In 2004, Aqua-Aerobic applied its expertise in
More informationInland Empire Utilities Agency Regional Plant No. 1 Title 22 Engineering Report
Regional Plant No. Title 22 Engineering Report Table of Contents Page Introduction. Background... -.2 Objective... - 2 Regulatory Requirements 2. Types of Reuse... 2-2.2 Water Recycling Criteria... 2-2.3
More informationPERFORMANCE AND RESIDUAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF 5 MGD MEMBRANE WATER PLANT. Presented by: Stephen P. Dorman, P.E.
PERFORMANCE AND RESIDUAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF 5 MGD MEMBRANE WATER PLANT Presented by: Stephen P. Dorman, P.E. sdorman@ksaeng.com 1 Outline Background Assessment of: Clarification Filtration Residuals
More informationComparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity
OWEA 2013 Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity Don Esping, Denny Parker, Jose Jimenez, Fenghua Yang, Tim Bate, Steve Arant June 19 2013 Outline Background/Goals
More informationNITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats
NITROGEN REMOVAL Create Optimal Habitats Recognize the Importance of People Skills Full-scale Experimentation GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR Regulatory Support Utility Support PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET
More informationBrightwater: The Design Challenges of a 39 mgd (150 MLD) Membrane Bioreactor
Brightwater: The Design Challenges of a 39 mgd (150 MLD) Membrane Bioreactor J. Komorita 1, P. Burke 2, B. Youker 2, and G. Crawford 2 1 King County, 2 CH2M HILL ABSTRACT Many Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
More informationWaste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour
Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour Outline Definitions Chronology BNR Process Description Plant Performance Site Photos Definitions SWPCC: Summerside Water Pollution Control Centre Activated
More informationBIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS
BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS PRESENTATION GOALS EXPLAIN DIFFERENT TYPES OF WASTEWATER EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENT BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS AND HOW THEY FUNCTION. COMPARE AND CONTRAST AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC SYSTEMS
More informationENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6
ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS G. Crawford 1,2, G. Daigger 1, and Z. Erdal 1 1 CH2M HILL 2 CH2M HILL 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6 ABSTRACT Several
More informationKoch Membrane Systems, Inc. Matias Amor Regional Sales Manager. WEX Casablanca Nov 2014
Koch Membrane Systems, Inc. Matias Amor Regional Sales Manager WEX Casablanca Nov 2014 Koch Industries Transforming Daily Life TM Roots in refining industry Global presence in nearly 60 countries About
More informationMEMBRANE BIOREACTORS (MBR)
MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS (MBR) MEMBRANE CLASSIFICATION Microfiltration (MF) Ultrafiltration (UF) Nanofiltration (NF) Reverse Osmosis (RO) COMPARISON OF MEMBRANE FILTRATION PROCESSES CONTAMINANTS REJECTED GENERAL
More informationSecondary Treatment Process Control
SARBS One-Day Training Seminar Phoenix Club, Anaheim Secondary Treatment Process Control Graham Juby June 5, 2013 Objectives Provide an understanding of nitrogen removal process interactions to support
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program
DISCUSSION PAPER Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program Macaulay/McLoughlin Point Wastewater Treatment Plant Discussion Paper Liquid Process Alternatives Evaluation 034-DP-1
More informationPNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE
Startup and 1 st Year of Operation at the Ventura Avenue UF WTP PNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE Acknowledgements Aileen Kondo, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Jim Passanisi and Mike Oakley,
More informationAL-KAWTHER INDUSTRIES LTD
AL-KAWTHER INDUSTRIES LTD 1 Presentation On Recycle Of Industrial Wastewater With Media Filtration And Reverse Osmosis By Al- Kawther Industries Ltd. March 2004 2 INTRODUCTION 3 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE STANDARDS
More informationMembrane Bioreactor. Highest level of effluent standards
Membrane Bioreactor Highest level of effluent standards The effluent produced by Ecoprocess MBR meet the strictest quality requirements for the discharge of treated wastewater, including disinfection,
More informationAqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR
MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR For over three decades, Aqua-Aerobic Systems has led the industry in sequencing batch reactor technology with performance proven and
More informationPilot Studies on Performance of Membrane Bio-Reactor in Treating Hong Kong Freshwater and Saline Sewage and Its Virus Rejection Ability and Mechanism
Pilot Studies on Performance of Membrane Bio-Reactor in Treating Hong Kong Freshwater and Saline Sewage and Its Virus Rejection Ability and Mechanism G. H. Chen and C. Shang The Hong Kong University of
More informationPRESENTATION OUTLINE
Unique Water Quality Challenges of the Sheyenne River: A Comparative Pilot Study of Three MF/UF Systems Qigang Chang, PhD, PE, AE2S Troy Hall, Fargo Water Utility Director Co-authors: Brian Bergantine,
More informationZero Liquid Discharge Project Extends Potable Water Supplies
http://dx.doi.org/10.5991/opf.2014.40.0078 Ryan R. Popko, PE, and Phillip J. Locke, PE, are with McKim & Creed (www.mckimcreed.com), Clearwater, Fla. Fred J. Greiner is with the city of Palm Coast, Fla.
More informationCarbon Canyon Water Recycling Facility Title 22 Engineering Report
Carbon Canyon Water Recycling Facility Title 22 Engineering Report April 2014 Introduction Regulatory Requirements Inland Empire Utilities Agency Carbon Canyon Water Recycling Facility Title 22 Engineering
More informationMembrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects
Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects Glen T. Daigger, Ph.D., P.E., DEE, NAE Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer CH2M HILL Presented
More informationImproved Membrane Design Addresses Integrity Issues for the City of Yuba City Water Treatment Plant
Improved Membrane Design Addresses Integrity Issues for the City of Yuba City Water Treatment Plant Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering Acknowledgements City of Yuba City - John Westhouse, Plant Supervisor
More informationEVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT
EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT Matthew Valade, P.E. July 25, 2014 Barboe.pptx Presentation Outline Project Background Why Dewater Croton Residuals Offsite?
More informationOperation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP
Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP CENTRAL PLANT Williamsport Sanitary Authority s Chesapeake Bay and CSO Compliance Program Presented by: Phil Anderson 1 June 24, 2015 Purpose
More informationFEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT FOR Proposed Residential Apartment project by M/s. DS-Max Properties Pvt Ltd, at Sy No. 27/2 & 27/3 at Valagerahalli Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore
More informationPRIMARY DRINKING WATER FROM WASTEWATER EFFLUENT: PILOT TEST EXPERIENCE AT THE MIAMI DADE SOUTH DISTRICT WWTP
PRIMARY DRINKING WATER FROM WASTEWATER EFFLUENT: PILOT TEST EXPERIENCE AT THE MIAMI DADE SOUTH DISTRICT WWTP Paul J. Vinci, P.E. 1, Richard Cisterna, P.E. 1, Robert Harris 1, John Chorlog, P.E. 2, Joseph
More informationNutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT Presentation Outline 1. Nutrient removal, treatment fundamentals 2. Treatment strategies Treatment methods: CAS, SBR,
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT MASTER PLAN SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Modesto Wastewater Treatment Master Plan Jennings Road Secondary Treatment Facility WASTEWATER TREATMENT MASTER PLAN SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT June 2008 2700 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD, SUITE
More informationISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade
ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade May. 28, 2013 A. Site Conditions 1. Site elevation = 5,322 ft MSL 2. Average barometric pressure = 12.07 psia 3.
More informationPILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ
PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ ABSTRACT Ron Riska,: Pima County Wastewater Management Division Joseph A. Husband, P.E.,
More informationBiological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.
Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E. Overview What is phosphorus and why do we care? How can you remove phosphorus? Biological phosphorus removal Biological phosphorus
More informationAMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1
Nitrogen removal Nitrogen present in meat processing wastewater are termed a nutrient, since they are essential elements for life. They largely derive from proteins dissolved into wastewater from meat
More informationAMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1
Nitrogen removal Nitrogen present in meat processing wastewater are termed a nutrient, since they are essential elements for life. They largely derive from proteins dissolved into wastewater from meat
More informationWastewater Treatment clarifier
Wastewater Treatment Pretreatment During pretreatment, items would normally be removed that would hinder the further processes of treatment. Items commonly removed include roots, rags, cans, or other large
More informationA Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox
A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox David Oerke/CH2M Tom Johnson/CH2M Bruce Johnson/CH2M Heidi Bauer/CH2M Steve Graziano/CH2M
More informationmembrane bioreactor performance compared to conventional wastewater treatment
Water Technologies & Solutions technical paper membrane bioreactor performance compared to conventional wastewater treatment Authors: Thomas C. Schwartz and Brent R. Herring, Woodard and Curran Incorporated
More informationSIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES
SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES Oxidation ditches are very popular wastewater treatment processes for small to medium sized municipalities that
More informationHybrid Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) Offer an Efficient Wastewater Treatment
Hybrid Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) Offer an Efficient Wastewater Treatment CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Michael Lahlou, E.I.T. and James Matthews, P.E. Batch processes are not a new or innovative wastewater
More information