(CEMS) Sanjeev K Kanchan. Centre for Science and Environment

Transcription

1 Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) Sanjeev K Kanchan

2 CEMS- What & Why? Strong pollution control regime is must Unlike US, EU, developing countries suffers from weak/missingpollution norms, standardised monitoring, market, transparency India inadequate existing regime 1. Manual monitoring low frequency, prone to manipulation 2. Reported data doesn t match actual emission 3. If online monitors no check on calibration, limited reporting 4. Real time data not accessible to regulator for verification 5. Poortransparency transparency no public scrutiny 6. Limited inspection fails to ensure adequate pollution control practices

3 CEMS- What & Why? GRP experience Even if pollution norms are tightened with time, pollution keeps growing; False compliance; poor monitoring & reporting 55% TPPs had very high emission 10% TPPs with PM norms of mg/nm 3 visible emissions SO 2 no control, reported <13mg/Nm 3. Global best ~25mg/Nm 3 NOx reported <0.1mg/Nm 3. Global best ~80mg/Nm 3 CEMS A solution An important tool Ensures data accuracy, higher monitoring frequency, minimalmanual intervention, firm regulatory monitoring, better transparency.

4 CEMS- PM

5 CEMS- SO2, NOx

6 CEMS- Effluent

7 CEMS- framework

8 USEPA Experience 1. In mid 1970's Federal CEMS for tracking performance of APC device under EPA s NSPS (New Source Performance Standards). 2. Under ARP (Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act), stringent performance requirements for CEMS Mandatory real time monitoring SO 2, NOx, and CO 2 If 2 or more CEMS in same stack/duct primary + back up May choose alternative monitoring system demonstrate alternative having same/better precision, reliability, accessibility, and timelines Selection of device & conformance with the performance specifications

9 USEPA Experience Certification : Once installed, initial certification within 30 days performance tests Report of initial certification within 60 days Apply for certification Administrator s approval/disapproval within 120 days; otherwise deemed certified On disapproval monitored data invalid certification retest Re certification : series of tests required Any replacement/modification/change in a certified device, flue gas handling, operations that may affect device s performance After modification/change, a probationary calibration error test During re certification data conditionally valid In case of failure data to be flagged missing get substituted

10 USEPA Experience Quality Assurance (QA) Testing: Regular, verifies accurate operation of equipment. E.g. for COMS zero, upscale calibration drift test etc. Data monitoring & collection cycle: CEMS minimum one cycle in 15 mins mins. 4 cycles estimate hourly avg. COMS every 10 sec data (sampling & analysis ) to average for every 6 mins cycle 10 cycles estimate hourly avg. (state may permit differently) Plant t to report the dt data hourly, dil daily, quarterly, and annually No cycle time (pollutant conc. monitors like O2, moisture etc.) exceeds 15 mins

11 USEPA Experience Compliance check: Check for PM emission compliance (for LCP) o Min. total time of observations 3 hours (30 six minute averages) o Not to exceed 20 % opacity except one 6 minute period/hr (max 27 %) Check for SO 2, NOx emission compliance (LCP) o 30 days rolling avg. basis Special condition o Plants construction/modification/reconstruction before May 4, 2011, norms do not apply during startup, shutdown, or malfunction o Applicable for those commenced after May 3, 2011 Relative accuracy test audits at any time. If fails device is considered out of control till the next successful audit test

12 USEPA Experience Monitoring data availability and Substitution of invalid data: Need to monitor % valid data availability/ year To maintain record of hourly avg. data for at least 3 years Certification, qlty control and assurance data recorded daily Invalid data to be substituted If valid, quality assured data not provided by a certified equipment, missing/invalid data is substituted by estimating from valid data recorded in last 3 years. Plants are required to submit Excess Emission Reports (EERs): include excess emissions and excess monitoring system down time, quarterly and sometimes monthly

13 Real-time effluents monitoring in USA Regulated by the National PollutantDischarge EliminationSystem (NPDES) established under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of Both sequential and continuous monitoring allowed If higher monitoring frequency needed continuous samplers To establish continuous monitoring requirement env. significance of effluent parameters and cost implicationsare are assessed Limited parameters flow, TOC, temp., ph, conductivity, residual Cl, F, DO etc. Monitoring and reporting requirements are decided on case to case basis. Requirements may be reduced dbased excellent historical i performance Effluent Limits: by comparing BAT based effluent with water quality based effluent limits Monitoring Frequency: based on flow, pollutant type & concentration, treatment capacity & method, compliance history, permittee s capabilities, discharge location & frequency etc.

14 EU Experience Called as Automated Measuring System (AMS). European Standard (EN 14181) specifies 3 quality assurance levels and an annual surveillance test. Quality assurance level 1 (QAL1): Suitability of CEMS Before installation MCERTS certification for compliance with QAL1 Plant to do required tests zero span, linearity, leak detection etc. Quality assurance level 2 (QAL2): Calibration and Validation Post installation Verifies through inspection and set of functional tests Frequency o After installation, o Every 5 year for LCP/ 3 year for waste incinerators, o Significant change in plant operations, significant upgrade or change in device

15 System for uncertainty of CEMS EU Experience Table. Allowable uncertainties of CEMS for coal based LCP in EU Limits mg/m 3 Certification range, mg/m 3 Allowable uncertainty, % NOx % SO % PM (LCP) % 9 15 Allowable uncertainty, mg/m 3 Quality assurance level 3 (QAL3): During operation Detects drift and changes in precision zero and span readings Frequency weekly or shorter based on method (CUSUM; cumulative sum control, Stewart chart etc. ) Mandatory recording of all activities CEMS details & changes, manufacturers service visit, call out records, routine maintenance, corrective actions, zero and span drift plots and tabulation etc.

16 EU Experience Annual surveillance test (AST): Check that calibration function carried under QAL2 is valid Same functional tests as in QAL2, but less repetitions If the AST shows calibration invalid, then a full QAL2 is required Sampling frequency and duration: decided in management plan Commonly duration is 30 minutes, but may vary depending on the pollutant (e.g. for PCDD/F duration is 6 hours), expected conc., dt detection ti limit it and emission i profile of the process. Compliance: Vary among EU members, sector wise. For LCP : 95 % of all hourly avg (yearly) not to exceed 200 % of the norm Daily average not to exceed 110 % of the norm Monthly average not to exceed the norm For <50 MW, daily average not to exceed 150 % of the norm

17 Status in India No established regulatory framework for CEMS till now A pilot project for continuous PM monitoring and ETS initiated in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu A direction by CPCB for installation of CEMS for air pollution monitoring and effluent quality monitoring from stationary sources CPCB guidelines for online continuous monitoring systems for effluents

18 PM - CEMS in India CEMS guidelines for PM with ihspecial ilreference to pilot scale ETS Selection of suitable certified deviceo Mass flow or, concentration based o =<10mg/Nm 3 detection level, <1 % drift, < 5% measurement deviation o Flow metre with 1 m/s min detection, < 1% zero and span drift, < 2% measurement deviation o Hardware & software to record every 1 min data, 90% or higher data availability Certification from recognized agency USEPA PSII, MCERT, TUV etc. Initial calibration required before installation Device performance test after calibration Periodical quality control test CEMS audit at least every 12 months

19 PM- CEMS in India Standard operating procedure Device installation, registration, configuration industry to do Calibration Accredited lab (by NABL/MoEF/CPCB/SPCB) o Sampling under various operational conditions (load, efficiency of APC device etc.) o 95% data availability o Calibration at least every 6 months after initial calibration Post calibration performance test to measure avg. deviation between raw readings and iso kinetic readings and fix calibration equation CEMS audit and CEMS audit performance test by accredited labs at fixed calibration equation, sample points and at different load Recalibrationoif operating out of range 10% or more in a week for 5 weeks or more/ 40% or more in a week for 01 week or more (45 mins moving average), odevice hardware changed, changes in fuel/process, major change in APC device oevery 06 months, ofailure of CEMS audit

20 Real-time effluent monitoring in India Selection of equipment by industries Device calibration (weekly for most parameters) by manufacturer At least 85% data availability 1 min. data average every 30 minutes transfer Allows 10% exceedance of norm; Regular exceedance action Relative difference between online and laboratory lb measurement ±10% allowed for BOD, COD, TSS and ±0.2 for ph ZLD plants to install camera with night vision and flow meter Plants ZLD by utilizing treated water in irrigation to install continuous monitor at the outlet of ETP Bank guarantee (of 25 % of device cost) from manufacturer to ensure optimal performance of device, and 85% data availability. Cost of effluent monitoring 1.5 lakh to 60.5 lakh across sectors