Effect of High-Occupancy Toll Lanes on Mass Vehicle Emissions
|
|
- Alyson Elliott
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Effect of High-Occupancy Toll Lanes on Mass Vehicle Emissions Application to I-85 in Atlanta, Georgia David N. Kall, Randall L. Guensler, Michael O. Rodgers, and Vishal S. Pandey High-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes were recently proposed for I-85 in Atlanta, Georgia, as a way to relieve congestion and to provide a reliable commute time for single-occupant drivers who are willing to pay a toll. It is important to evaluate the air quality impacts of such a proposal in the context of environmental regulations, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and transportation conformity regulations. Several factors affect mass vehicle emissions, such as vehicle activity, speed, age distributions, and class distributions. These factors are incorporated into a base scenario that models the current conditions on I-85 with high-occupancy vehicle lanes by using data collected in the corridor during the summer of 2007, and a future scenario that models the implementation of HOT lanes on this corridor by using information from cities that already have HOT lanes. The MOBILE-Matrix modeling tool, recently developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology, is used for the emissions analysis by means of the input factors described above. It calculates mass emissions for five pollutants: hydrocarbons (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or smaller (PM 2.5 ), and PM 10 (with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or smaller) as a function of fleet composition and on-road operating conditions. The modeling work predicts extremely small increases in mass emissions for NO x, CO, PM 2.5, and PM 10, and an extremely small decrease in mass emissions for HC. In addition, the postimplementation emissions changes fall well within the motor vehicle emissions budgets for the facility that are used in air quality planning. Therefore, implementation of HOT lanes on I-85 in Atlanta should not violate the emissions budget requirements of the federal Transportation Conformity Rule. For NEPA purposes, this analysis could be used to make the case that air quality impacts are not significant, and therefore further detailed analyses are not required. High-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes were recently proposed for I-85 in Atlanta, Georgia, as a way to relieve congestion and provide a reliable commute time for three-person carpools and for others willing to pay a toll. The current I-85 HOT lane proposal would not involve construction of new lanes but would instead convert the existing HOV-2 (two-person high-occupancy vehicle) lanes to HOV-3 (three-person HOV) lanes and use the new excess capacity for tollpaying single-occupant vehicles (SOVs). The proposed HOT lane School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA Corresponding author: D. N. Kall, kall.david@gmail.com. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2123, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp DOI: / configuration is the same as the current HOV lane, which is a concurrent flow lane without barrier separation from the general purpose (GP) lanes. This study focuses on air quality concerns by evaluating how the HOT lane conversion on I-85 will affect vehicle total mass emissions due to changes in traffic volumes, vehicle fleet characteristics (such as age distributions and class distributions), and changes in operating conditions (such as speeds). Emissions are evaluated for five pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or smaller (PM 2.5 ), and PM 10 (with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or smaller). With respect to the implications of the project on environmental regulations [the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the federal Transportation Conformity Rule], the authors conclude that there is no significant impact on air quality. METHODOLOGY The goal of this study is to understand how vehicle mass emissions change as a result of implementing HOT lanes on I-85 in Atlanta. This goal is achieved by calculating the mass emissions for a base scenario and for a future scenario on the basis of four input factors. Fleet differences are modeled in each scenario for peak periods in each direction. The base scenario estimates are performed for the vehicle fleet that currently uses the I-85 corridor, where the fleet has been delineated by using license plate and count data collected by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) during the summer of The future scenario employs a different vehicle fleet that is based on observed vehicle fleet characteristics from SR-91 lanes in California. Changes in speeds in GP lanes are taken from the MnPass lanes in Minnesota. In addition, changes to speeds and volumes for HOT lanes are based on the assumption that pricing will hold the lane at effective capacity. Mass emissions are calculated by multiplying vehicle activity, measured in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), by a composite emission rate (g/veh mi): ME h = VMT h CER where ME/h = mass emissions (g/h), VMT/h = vehicle miles traveled per hour (veh mi/h) = traffic volume per hour (veh/h) * roadway distance (mi), and CER = composite emission rate (g/veh mi). 88
2 Kall, Guensler, Rodgers, and Pandey 89 The composite emission rate is the average emission rate per vehicle and is calculated by an emission rate model that uses the emissions rates for different vehicle types (classes), vehicle ages, and operating characteristics for the modeled vehicles. For this analysis, the MOBILE-Matrix CALINE-Grid tool provides the composite emissions rates for both the base and future scenarios. To examine the effect of HOT lane implementation on the I-85 corridor, the vehicle activity and composite emissions rates both before and after conversion of HOV lanes is examined to determine whether emissions will decrease or increase and whether the net change in emissions is significant. Overview of MOBILE-Matrix CALINE-Grid Modeling Tool The MOBILE-Matrix CALINE-Grid, which is Georgia Tech s newly developed tool for assessing air quality impacts, provides emissions rates and mass emissions calculations on a link-by-link basis with a set of prerun emissions rate lookup matrices. The development of this tool closely followed the methods outlined by Guensler et al. (1). One advantage of the MOBILE-Matrix tool over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) MOBILE6 model alone is that thousands of MOBILE6.2 modeling runs have already been completed by varying calendar years, evaluation month (January or July), facility type, vehicle speeds, and ambient temperatures. The modeling runs use standard assumptions employed by the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) that incorporate local conditions in the 13-county Atlanta area, such as humidity, inspection and maintenance programs, and regional fuel characteristics. The results of these modeling runs have been placed in large lookup tables and can be called up on the basis of inputs provided by the user of the MOBILE Matrix tool that correspond to the varying factors in the lookup tables, such as calendar year and evaluation month. Therefore, speeds from hundreds of roadway links can be automatically matched with the appropriate emission rates table, which represents 28 MOBILE vehicle types and 25 vehicle ages. Next, the emission rate table is multiplied by the vehicle age distributions and vehicle class distributions provided by the user. This procedure results in a single composite emission rate for each roadway link. Vehicle Activity Volumes for the I-85 base scenario come from count data of a summer field study. These data were collected on JAMAR count boards for 60 to 75 min for three days (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for each site, time, and direction combination. The observations occurred between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. for the a.m. peak and between 4:30 and 6:30 p.m. for the p.m. peak. During this 2-h period, the research team collected both northbound and southbound data, in one direction for the first hour and the opposite direction for the second hour. The data were collected by individual lane; therefore, it is possible to separate the volumes from GP and HOV lanes. Table 1 shows the volumes derived from the count data of the summer field study. The future scenario applies changes to the base scenario volumes on the basis of assumptions about effective capacity of the HOT lane. HOT lanes operate on the concept that pricing can be used to adjust the demand for that particular lane, so that traffic volumes are held right below the capacity of the lane. Research by Guin et al. (2) on I-85 in Atlanta has determined that the capacity of an HOV lane is lower than the capacity of a GP lane. That research used data from Georgia Navigator the local intelligent transportation system that uses video detection system cameras to monitor continuous speed and volume data on the major freeway system to determine the effective capacity for an HOV lane and the adjacent GP lane on a stretch of I-85 from I-285 to SR-316. The researchers found that the effective capacity for the I-85 HOV lane is approximately 1,500 veh/h, occurring at 40 mph. The GP lane s effective capacity is higher, at around 2,500 veh/h. These values are shown on the speed flow diagrams in Figure 1, which were developed by using the Georgia Navigator data. That research cited HOV drivers safety TABLE 1 Volumes for Base Scenario GP HOV Section Observation Site Time Direction (vol./ln/h) (vol./ln/h) 1 Fair Dr. a.m. NB 1,507 1,145 2 Fifth St. a.m. NB 1,924 1,336 3 Chamblee Tucker Rd. a.m. NB Northcrest Rd. a.m. NB Beaver Ruin Rd. a.m. NB 1, Fair Dr. a.m. SB Fifth St. a.m. SB 1,625 1,130 3 Chamblee Tucker Rd. a.m. SB 1, Northcrest Rd. a.m. SB 1,398 1,118 5 Beaver Ruin Rd. a.m. SB 1,824 1,373 1 Fair Dr. p.m. NB 1, Fifth St. p.m. NB 1,753 1,297 3 Chamblee Tucker Rd. p.m. NB 1, Northcrest Rd. p.m. NB 1,170 1,152 5 Beaver Ruin Rd. p.m. NB 1,545 1,181 1 Fair Dr. p.m. SB 1, Fifth St. p.m. SB 1,256 1,365 3 Chamblee Tucker Rd. p.m. SB 1, Northcrest Rd. p.m. SB Beaver Ruin Rd. p.m. SB 1, NOTE: NB = northbound; SB = southbound.
3 90 Transportation Research Record Vehicle Speed (mph) GP1 HOV Traffic Flow (vehicles/hour) FIGURE 1 Georgia navigator speed flow diagram for I-85 north of Atlanta (2). concerns that were associated with vehicles jumping into or out of the HOV lane as the main reason for the lower effective capacity in the HOV lane (2). It is possible that electronic enforcement of entrance and exit points for the HOT lanes could reduce these weaving patterns and increase the effective capacity slightly beyond 1,500 veh/h; however, this analysis assumes that the effective capacity of the HOT lane will be the same as the effective capacity of the HOV lane. To estimate the volume reductions on the GP lanes, a comparison is made between the volume increases on the HOT lanes and the volume reductions on the GP lanes. In theory, much of the volume increase on the HOT lane is due to vehicles in the GP lanes paying to switch to the faster HOT lanes. The remaining volume increase on the HOT lane likely comes from the latent demand for extra capacity in the corridor. For example, travelers who would not have taken the trip or would have taken a different route are now choosing to use the extra capacity in the HOT lane. Data from the MnPass HOT lane project in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which has a similar configuration for much of its length (concurrent flow lanes not barrier separated) to that envisioned for the Atlanta HOT system, revealed that the GP lane volume decrease is 77.2% of the HOT lane volume increase (3). Therefore, the change in GP lane volume is calculated as 77.2% of the change in HOV lane volume, as shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 Volume Changes for Future Scenario Volume per Hour Section Observation Site Time Direction HOV Base HOT Future HOV Change GP Change 1 Fair Dr. a.m. NB 1,145 1, Fifth St. a.m. NB 1,336 1, Chamblee Tucker Rd. a.m. NB Northcrest Rd. a.m. NB Beaver Ruin Rd. a.m. NB Fair Dr. a.m. SB Fifth St. a.m. SB 1,130 1, Chamblee Tucker Rd. a.m. SB 872 1, Northcrest Rd. a.m. SB 1,118 1, Beaver Ruin Rd. a.m. SB 1,373 1, Fair Dr. p.m. NB Fifth St. p.m. NB 1,297 1, Chamblee Tucker Rd. p.m. NB 847 1, Northcrest Rd. p.m. NB 1,152 1, Beaver Ruin Rd. p.m. NB 1,181 1, Fair Dr. p.m. SB 864 1, Fifth St. p.m. SB 1,365 1, Chamblee Tucker Rd. p.m. SB Northcrest Rd. p.m. SB Beaver Ruin Rd. p.m. SB
4 Kall, Guensler, Rodgers, and Pandey 91 Vehicle Operating Speeds Speeds for the base scenario were obtained from a 2006 run of the travel demand model (TDM) from the ARC, which is the local metropolitan planning organization. This particular run was conducted for the 2006 state implementation plan (SIP) for 8-h ozone nonattainment (4). Speeds for the a.m. and p.m. periods were selected from the TDM to correspond to the periods of volume data collection during the summer field study. Changes to speed are made for the future scenario only for the links in the peak time and direction, such as a.m. southbound for northern observation sites. Fifth Street is considered to have peak conditions during all times and directions. All HOT links in the peak time and direction are assumed to operate at 40 mph, which is the speed that corresponds to the effective capacity of 1,500 veh/h applied to the HOT links on the basis of previous research on I-85 (2). For the GP links in the peak time and direction, data on changes in speed on I-394 associated with the HOT lane implementation in Minneapolis are applied. These data show a 4.2% increase in speed for GP lanes during the morning and a 4.1% increase in speed for GP lanes during the afternoon (3). These values are taken from the diamond-lane section of I-394, which resembles the proposed configuration on I-85 in Atlanta. On-Road Vehicle Age Distribution MOBILE modeling typically uses registration distribution and mileage accumulation as inputs, but these two inputs can be replaced by an on-road vehicle age distribution if the distribution is known. This study uses the on-road vehicle age distribution because it is available for the I-85 corridor from the summer field study license plate data for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and light-duty trucks (LDTs). For the remaining vehicle classes (heavy-duty trucks and buses), age distributions from the ARC and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division are used. These data are based upon registration data from R. L. Polk and Co. for the 13-county area (except for heavy-duty vehicle Classification 8B, which uses national defaults), and national mileage accumulation defaults from the EPA. The on-road vehicle age distributions for the base scenario are developed by using the license plate data for passenger cars and LDTs, which were recorded by site, lane, time, and direction. These license plates are matched to the Georgia registration database, which provides vehicle identification numbers that are decoded to obtain make and model year information for over 110,000 vehicles. The make of these vehicles, such as four-door sedan, are mapped to MOBILE vehicle types. Because the license plate data were collected only for small passenger vehicles, almost all the vehicles fell into the MOBILE vehicle type LDV or LDT2. On-road vehicle age distributions are created for the base scenario individually for each of the 80 combinations of vehicle type, lane type, time, direction, and site, by using gamma distribution values to fill in data gaps for vehicles from older model years. However, due to low volumes for HOV sites during off-peak times, these 20 distributions are condensed into eight distributions by combining from surrounding sites, to prevent the lack of data from producing unreliably shaped distributions. For the future scenario, changes are applied to the on-road vehicle age distributions in the peak time and direction to reflect the change in vehicle fleet characteristics during pricing periods on the HOT lanes. A case study of SR-91 in southern California contains information on the differences in vehicle fleet characteristics between the GP and HOT lanes (5). SR-91 is of interest to this study because it is a variably priced tollway. The SR-91 toll fluctuates on the basis of demand but always allows carpools of three or more persons to travel in the lanes for free; these are the same payment conditions envisioned for the HOT lanes in Atlanta. In their study, Barth et al. (5) used license plate data to distribute the vehicle fleet on the GP and HOT lanes into technology categories used in the Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model, as shown in Table 3. To apply the Barth et al. (5) distributions to I-85 in Atlanta, a mapping procedure is used to convert the vehicle technology categories into model years, which are required by the MOBILE- Matrix emissions model used in this analysis. This mapping procedure, which is outlined by Barth et al. in a separate paper (5), uses data that describe the vehicle technologies that were used during the production of certain model year vehicles. For example, vehicles from the 1974 model year and earlier do not have catalytic converters; therefore, the category for no catalyst can be applied to this group of model year vehicles. While the mapping procedure produced a distribution for 1973 to 1997 model year vehicles, it was assumed that these distributions could be generalized to vehicle ages instead of model years. While this assumption ignores several real-world occurrences, such as changing vehicle lifetimes over time and vehicle sales patterns that are dependent on particular model years, it is believed that these items would create only small differences over the 13 years between the Barth et al. (5) study and the proposed I-85 HOT lane implementation. Therefore, these differences were ignored for the purposes of this analysis. Instead of using the actual distributions found for HOT lanes on SR-91, the relationships between the GP and HOT lanes for various vehicle ages on SR-91 are applied to the age distributions for the GP lane observed on I-85 in Atlanta. Use of this method reflects the local vehicle age distributions in Atlanta and at the same time considers differences in the age of vehicles that drive in the HOT lane. Therefore, for each vehicle age, a conversion factor for GP lane to HOT lane is created by dividing the distribution percentage for the HOT lane by the distribution percentage for the GP lane. These conversion factors are simply multiplied by an age distribution for the GP lane to obtain a projected age distribution for the HOT lane. The magnitude of the conversion factors for GP lane to HOT lane can be interpreted to describe the extent of the difference in number of vehicles of a certain age that can be expected in the HOT lane compared with the GP lane. For example, a conversion factor of 1.0 means that there are an equal number of vehicles from that model year in the GP and HOT lanes, while a conversion factor of 2.0 means that there are twice as many vehicles from that model year in the HOT lane than in the GP lane. Figure 2 shows that 9-year-old and newer vehicles have factors above the 1.0 solid dividing line, which correspond to more vehicles in the HOT lane than in the GP lane. The 10-year-old and older vehicles have a factor below the 1.0 solid dividing line, which corresponds to fewer vehicles in the HOT lane. This result is expected due to the known strong relationship between higher personal income and newer vehicle ages (7) and the expectation that HOT lane drivers will be higher income individuals who are more willing to pay the associated toll. These conversion factors are applied to age distributions for the GP lane to estimate the HOT lane distributions for the peak time and direction. Figure 3 shows an example of an on-road vehicle age distribution for a HOT lane calculated by applying the conversion factors to the GP lane distribution.
5 92 Transportation Research Record 2123 TABLE 3 SR-91 Vehicle Fleet Distribution by Technology Category (5) No. Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model Category GP HOT 1 No catalyst way catalyst way catalyst, carbureted way catalyst, FI, >50K mi, low power/weight way catalyst, FI, >50K mi, high power/weight way catalyst, FI, <50K mi, low power/weight way catalyst, FI, <50K mi, high power/weight Tier 1, >50K mi, low power/weight Tier 1, >50K mi, high power/weight Tier 1, <50K mi, low power/weight Tier 1, <50K mi, high power/weight Pre-1979 ( 8,500 GVW) ( 8,500 GVW) ( 8,500 GVW) , 3,750 LVW , >3,750 LVW Tier 1 LDT2/3 (3,751 5,750 LVW or alt. LVW) Tier 1 LDT4 (6,001 8,500 GVW, >5,750 alt. LVW) Runs lean Runs rich Misfire Bad catalyst Runs very rich Tier 1, >100K mi Gasoline-powered, LDT (>8,500 GVW) Diesel-powered, LDT (>8,500 GVW) Total On-Road Vehicle Class Distribution To create on-road vehicle class distributions (known as VMT fractions in MOBILE) local data are used from the summer field study volume counts, which provided four vehicle types: passenger vehicles, small trucks, large trucks, and buses. Because the summer field study data do not provide sufficient detail to break the vehicles into 28 MOBILE vehicle types, a combination of the summer field study data and the national default VMT fractions are used to create local VMT fractions. To do this, summer field study vehicle types, which are based on FHWA vehicle class definitions, are matched to MOBILE6 vehicle types through a mapping procedure Multiplier LDGV LDGT Vehicle Age FIGURE 2 GP to HOT lane conversion fractions. (LDGV = light-duty gasoline vehicles; LDGT = light-duty gasoline trucks.)
6 Kall, Guensler, Rodgers, and Pandey Percent Base HOV Base GP Future HOT Model Year (a) National Defaults GP AM NB Fifth St Percent LDGV LDGT1 LDGT2 LDGT3 LDGT4 HDGV2B HDGV3 HDGV4 HDGV5 HDGV6 HDGV7 HDGV8A HDGV8B (b) LDDV LDDT12 HDDV2B HDDV3 HDDV4 HDDV5 MOBILE6 Vehicle Type HDDV6 HDDV7 HDDV8A HDDV8B MC HDGB HDDBT HDDBS LDDT34 FIGURE 3 Example HOT lane age distribution and vehicle class distribution. (HDGV = heavy-duty gas vehicles; LDDV = light-duty diesel vehicles; LDDT = light-duty diesel trucks; HDDV = heavy-duty diesel vehicles; MC = motorcycles; HDGB = heavy-duty gasoline bus; HDDBT = heavy-duty diesel and urban transit buses; HDDBS = heavy-duty diesel school buses, and LDDT = light-duty diesel trucks.) from Yoon (8). With knowledge of which MOBILE6 vehicle types are included in each of the summer field study categories, the distributions collected for that study can be further distributed to all 28 MOBILE6 vehicle types. This distribution is done by using the relative share of each of the MOBILE6 vehicle types for each summer field study category on the basis of national defaults. An example of a full set of local VMT fractions compared with national defaults can be found in Figure 3. Because the observation site for this example lies within I-285 perimeter (on GP lanes), which is the boundary for restricting heavy through-trucks in Atlanta, the percentage of heavy trucks is substantially less than the national defaults. Heavy trucks are not currently allowed on any HOV lanes (inside or outside of I-285) and will continue to be prohibited on future HOT lanes.
7 94 Transportation Research Record 2123 The same VMT fractions are used for both the base and the future scenarios on the basis of the assumption that the implementation of a HOT lane will not affect the vehicle class distribution. This is believed to be a fairly reasonable assumption as long as the HOT lane implementation also allows transit and school buses in the same manner as the current HOV lane does. It is possible that the demographics of HOT lane drivers and possible commercial uses could cause a different mix of LDV and LDT2 vehicles. However, due to the lack of available data on this effect and the belief that this effect would be fairly small, a possible change in the mix of LDV and LDT2 vehicles is ignored for this analysis. EMISSIONS ANALYSIS AND RESULTS Major Findings After the MOBILE-Matrix tool with the input factors described above for a 2010 analysis year are run, the final results show very small changes in the mass emissions between the base and the future scenarios. For all pollutants except HC, very small increases are predicted for the future scenarios. For HC, a small decrease is predicted for the future scenarios. These results appear in Table 4. When the peak time and direction are isolated, as shown in the columns for those variables in Table 4, the same trends between base and future scenarios can be observed. However, the magnitude of the increase or decrease is slightly higher because all changes in the future scenario are applied during the peak time and direction. To investigate further the reasons for the trends in predicted results, the percentage changes in mass emissions are examined separately for each of the three inputs changed in the future scenario (VMT, vehicle age, and vehicle speeds). Figure 4 shows the relative contributions of each of these three inputs along with the overall percentage difference in mass emissions due to all future changes. Adjustments applied to volumes in the future scenario yield a small predicted increase (less than 1%) in VMT during both the morning and the afternoon. Therefore, all pollutants show an increase in mass emissions due to changes in VMT; however, the magnitudes of these increases are different because of the varying emission rates for each pollutant. Changes in vehicle age and speeds have a less-consistent effect on mass emissions due to different relationships with emission rates for each pollutant built into the MOBILE model. The newer vehicle ages applied in the future scenario reduce the mass emissions for HC, CO, and NO x but have no effect on PM 2.5 and PM 10 emissions. Changes to vehicle speeds have varying effects on mass emissions for HC, CO, and NO x but have no effect on PM 2.5 and PM 10 emissions. Putting Predicted Emissions Changes into Context To put the predicted emissions changes into a broader context, they are presented on the right side of Table 4 as the equivalent change in total pounds per day, VMT per day, and total number of vehicles taken off or put onto the road. PM 2.5 a.m. data, which exhibited the largest increase, are examined here as an example of the magnitude and insignificance of these increases in emissions. These data show that emissions will increase by only 37 lb/day in relation to the total 16,182 lb of PM 2.5 emitted per day on the facility before implementing HOT lanes. This increase is equivalent to about 67,000 additional VMT per day of the total of more than 8 million daily VMT on the facility. It is also equivalent to 2,229 additional vehicles on the region s roadway, assuming vehicles travel 30 mi/day. This quantity constitutes a 0.83% increase in predicted daily emissions for the facility. While quantitative estimates of the MOBILE model s overall accuracy and uncertainty are not available, some studies estimate uncertainty for specific parts of the model. For example, one study estimated uncertainties in LDV exhaust emissions to be 20% to 40% for HC and 25% to 55% for NO x (9). The predicted emissions increases of less than 1% for the I-85 corridor in question should certainly be considered insignificant (a) because they are so much smaller than the uncertainties in the emissions model and (b) given that the project is extremely small relative to the total motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB). Nevertheless, emissions from the I-85 HOT lane project must be directly assessed to demonstrate that they will not cause the MVEBs TABLE Mass Emissions on I-85 corridor in Atlanta and Equivalent Changes Time Peak Time and Direction All Times and Directions Scenario Base Future % Diff. Base Future % Diff. Equivalent Changes Units g/h g/h % g/h g/h % lb/day veh mi/day veh/day HC a.m. 44,675 43, ,059 63, ,398 3,180 p.m. 41,572 41, ,243 64, , CO a.m. 945, , ,412,701 1,416, , p.m. 1,517,035 1,530, ,513,693 2,527, ,936 1,165 NO x a.m. 277, , , , , p.m. 256, , , , , PM 2.5 a.m. 6,277 6, ,848 9, ,866 2,229 p.m. 5,850 5, ,099 9, ,753 1,392 PM 10 a.m. 11,615 11, ,598 17, ,426 1,948 p.m. 10,627 10, ,470 16, ,427 1,381
8 Kall, Guensler, Rodgers, and Pandey % Difference from Base Scenario AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM HC CO NOX PM2.5 PM Contributions VMT Only Age Only Speed Only All Future Changes FIGURE 4 Relative contributions to changes in mass emissions from individual inputs. for the Atlanta 8-h ozone nonattainment area to be exceeded. Conformity requires that the mass emissions from any transportation plan or project must be demonstrated to conform to the emissions budgets used in air quality planning. Under current regulatory interpretations, any predicted increase in emissions associated with plans or projects that results in the emissions budget being exceeded is considered to cause or contribute to a planning violation (irrespective of the uncertainty issues discussed earlier). Table 5 presents a comparison of the mass emissions for NO x (as one pollutant example) calculated for the base and future scenario of this study and the NO x MVEB from the 2006 SIP (4). The I-85 portion of the regional MVEB is isolated by means of a geographical information system analysis. Table 5 shows that both the base and the future scenarios fall well below the MVEB during both the morning and afternoon. While the amount below the budgets seems quite large at first, it is fairly consistent with the 75% below budget determined for Envision6, the transportation plan for the entire region. This comparison shows that the implementation of HOT lanes on I-85 will not cause the region to exceed its MVEB because the mass emissions results for I-85 fall well below the portion of the MVEBs allocated to the same portion of I-85 for both the base and the future scenarios. Therefore, the implementation of HOT lanes on I-85 should not violate the emissions budget requirements of the Transportation Conformity Rule. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This study completes a mass emissions analysis on I-85 in Atlanta for a base scenario that represents the current condition and a future scenario that represents the implementation of HOT lanes. Input factors considered for the analysis include vehicle activity, speeds, age distributions, and class distributions. The base scenario mainly uses information from a data collection effort by Georgia Tech during the summer of 2007 on the I-85 corridor, while the future scenario makes alterations to these data by using information from other cities that already have HOT lanes. The MOBILE-Matrix tool, recently developed by Georgia Tech, is used to run the emissions analysis with the input factors from these data sources. The results show very small predicted increases in mass emissions for NO x, CO, PM 2.5, TABLE 5 Comparison of I-85 Mass Emissions Results to MVEB Weighted Avg. NO X g/h Hourly VMT Emission Rate Scenario a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. Base 479, , , , Future 480, , , , MVEB (I-85 portion) 987,431 1,136, , , Base as % of MVEB Future as % of MVEB
9 96 Transportation Research Record 2123 and PM 10, and very small predicted decreases in mass emissions for HC along this corridor. The process used to conduct this analysis yields a number of lessons and conclusions: Locally collected corridor data, such as those gathered during the summer field study on I-85, can be used for better representation of corridor-specific conditions such as vehicle age distribution and class distribution. This option is preferable to the use of regional or national default values that can often significantly differ from local corridor values due to specific local conditions. For example, the vehicle class distributions (VMT fractions) for locations inside the I-285 perimeter in Atlanta have fewer heavy trucks and more LDVs than the national defaults due to the ban on through-truck traffic inside the perimeter. When an attempt is made to model a proposed HOT lane that does not yet exist, it is helpful to observe how conditions change in other cities after the implementation of a HOT lane. For example, this study made use of noted changes in vehicle speeds after the implementation of HOT lanes on I-394 in Minneapolis and changes in vehicle fleet characteristics associated with HOT lanes on SR91 in southern California. Predicted changes in mass vehicle emissions are influenced by changes in both VMT, which is due to vehicle activity, and the emission rate, which is due to changes in speed and vehicle fleet characteristics. For this study, emission rates are predicted to decrease or remain unchanged for the future scenario, and VMT are predicted to increase slightly for the future scenario. For four of the five pollutants, the predicted increase in VMT is modeled as having a greater impact on predicted emissions (causing a slight predicted increase in mass emissions). However, for HC, the predicted decrease in emission rates is modeled as having a larger net effect, causing a slight decrease in predicted mass emissions. It is important to determine whether the proposed project is likely to cause a conformity violation for the Atlanta 8-h ozone nonattainment area and the Atlanta PM 2.5 nonattainment area. The very small percentage change in predicted emissions along the corridor is well within the error bounds of current emission rate models. Hence, the small impact cannot be statistically differentiated from a zero predicted increase in emissions. This provides initial evidence that the conversion of HOV lanes to HOT lanes on I-85 will not significantly change the emissions that are modeled by the ARC for transportation conformity. The conformity regulation is currently interpreted such that any predicted increase in emissions (irrespective of modeling uncertainty) associated with plans or projects that result in an emissions budget being exceeded is considered to be a conformity violation. As such, the emissions changes associated with the project were compared with the regional MVEBs and to the allocated subregion (corridor) budgets to demonstrate that the implementation of HOT lanes on I-85 will not cause the region to exceed any of the MVEBs and will therefore have no significant impact. NEPA requires a detailed environmental analysis for proposed federal projects with a potentially significant environmental impact. In relation to air quality, the implementation of HOT lanes on I-85 has no potential impact due to the extremely small changes in mass vehicle emissions shown in this study. Therefore, this study makes a compelling case that further detailed analyses are not needed. REFERENCES 1. Guensler, R. L., K. K. Dixon, V. V. Elango, and S. Yoon. MOBILE Matrix: Application of Georgia Statewide Multimodal Transportation Planning Tool for Rural Areas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1880, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp Guin, A., M. P. Hunter, and R. Guensler. Analysis of Reduction in Effective Capacities on High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Related to Traffic Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2065, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp I-394 MnPass Technical Evaluation. Cambridge Systematics. Nov Georgia s Draft Early Progress State Implementation Plan Revision for the Atlanta 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area. Georgia Environmental Protection Division. Oct. 26, draft_early_progress_sip_links.html. 5. Barth, M., C. Malcolm, and G. Scora. Integrating a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model into ATMIS Transportation Modeling Frameworks. California PATH Research Report. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH). Research Reports. Paper UCB-ITS-PRR University of California, Berkeley, Aug repositories.cdlib. org/its/path/reports/ucb-its-prr Barth, M., F. An, T. Younglove, G. Scora, C. Levine, M. Ross, and T. Wenzel. NCHRP Web-Only Document 122: Development of a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., April onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w122.pdf. 7. Miller, T. L., W. T. Davis, G. D. Reed, P. Doraiswamy, and A. Tang. Effect of County Level Income on Vehicle Age Distribution and Emissions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1815, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp Yoon, S. A New Heavy-Duty Vehicle Visual Classification and Activity Estimation Method for Regional Mobile Source Emissions Modeling. PhD thesis. Aug Committee to Review EPA s Mobile Source Emissions Factor (MOBILE) Model. Modeling Mobile-Source Emissions. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., The Transportation and Air Quality Committee sponsored publication of this paper.
Introduction to MOVES for Non-Modelers
Introduction to MOVES for Non-Modelers David Bizot U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality Southern Transportation & Air Quality Summit July 2011 Training Outline What is MOVES? How is MOVES
More informationAPPENDIX J TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND STUDIES
Central Corridor LRT Project Appendix J Technical Information and Studies APPENDIX J TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND STUDIES Appendix J1... Air Quality Appendix J2... Electromagnetic Fields and Interference
More informationAIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE The following guidance provides additional details regarding the process followed by PSRC to evaluate projects for potential air quality benefits. As
More informationAlternative High Occupancy/Toll Lane Pricing Strategies and their Effect on Market Share
Alternative High Occupancy/Toll Lane Pricing Strategies and their Effect on Market Share Michael Janson and David Levinson High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) Lanes typically charge a varying to single occupant
More informationAIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS of the 2015 CLRP Amendment and the FY TIP
TPB Item #8 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS of the 2015 CLRP Amendment and the FY2015-2020 TIP Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board September 16, 2015 Pollutants Volatile Organic Compounds
More informationTexas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas
1. Report No. FHWA/TX-01/4190-4 4. Title and Subtitle EMISSIONS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND TRAFFIC DELAYS TASK 6: CONTRIBUTION OF VEHICULAR EMISSIONS CAUSED BY REDUCTION IN CAPACITY DURING ROADWAY
More informationUsing MOVES2010 for Estimating On-Road GHG Emissions
Using MOVES2010 for Estimating On-Road GHG Emissions David Bizot U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality Southern Transportation & Air Quality Summit July 2011 Presentation Overview Greenhouse
More informationI-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report
I-70 East ROD 1: Air Quality Conformity Technical Report January 2017 I-70 East ROD 1: Air Quality Conformity Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT... 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...
More informationImpacts of New Mobile Source Regulations on Emission Reductions from VMT-Based Transportation Control Strategies: Key
0 0 0 Impacts of New Mobile Source Regulations on Emission Reductions from VMT-Based Transportation Control Strategies: Key Considerations for Planning Agencies Alexandra Marcucci, Corresponding Author
More informationI. Overview. II. Background. Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards
Summary of NESCAUM Analysis Evaluating the NOx, HC, and CO Emission Reduction Potential from Adoption of the California Low Emission Vehicle (LEV II) Standards June, 2005 I. Overview This summary provides
More informationPREPRINT TITLE: AUTHORS: Matthew Thornton Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan 1575 Northside Drive, NW, Suite 350 Atlanta, GA
Paper No. -1132 PREPRINT Duplication of this preprint for publication or sale is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the Transportation Research Board TITLE: VEHICLE MODAL ACTIVITY
More informationAppendix C: GHG Emissions Model
Appendix C: GHG Emissions Model 1 METHOD OVERVIEW The Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM) Emissions Model (EM) is a CUBE-based model that uses emission rates calculated by the MOVES2010 EPA
More informationUSING A SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR DYNAMIC TOLL ANALYSIS
USING A SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR DYNAMIC TOLL ANALYSIS ABSTRACT Robert Kerns and Darryn Paterson Transurban, USA 1421 Prince Street, Suite 200 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 571-527-2050; rkerns@transurban.com;
More informationAppendix E. Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Appendix E Air Quality Conformity Analysis AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FOR THE 2017-2020 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 AIR QUALITY STATUS... 1 Figure
More informationYORK TOLL PLAZA MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY AIR QUALITY REPORT. September 28, 2016 NOISE ANALYSIS REPORT MAINETURNPIKE AUTHORI TY
NOISE ANALYSIS REPORT MAINETURNPIKE AUTHORI TY YORK TOLL PLAZA MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY AIR QUALITY REPORT September 28, 2016 (Cover photograph provided by MTA) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationHighlights from the 2012 FHWA EPA Northern Transportation and Air Quality Summit
em summit highlights Highlights from the 2012 FHWA EPA Northern Transportation and Air Quality Summit by Kevin Black, Martin Kotsch, Michael Roberts, Greg Becoat, Melanie Zeman, Joseph Rich, Mark Glaze,
More informationMONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE
12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges
More information7.0 Benefit/Cost Analysis
7.0 Benefit/Cost Analysis 7.0 Benefit/Cost Analysis This section presents detailed instructions on how to conduct benefit-cost analysis using a spreadsheet tool developed for the Phase I evaluation; this
More informationAlternatives Evaluation Report. Appendix C. Alternatives Evaluation Report
s Evaluation Report Appendix C s Evaluation Report I-35W North Corridor Project EA Minnesota Department of Transportation Final Project s Report I-35W North Corridor Preliminary Design Project Report Version
More informationThe role of light duty vehicles in future air pollution: a case study of Sacramento
Transportation Planning and Technology Vol. 33, No. 6, August 2010, 541549 The role of light duty vehicles in future air pollution: a case study of Sacramento Guihua Wang* Institute of Transportation Studies,
More informationA. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
Chapter 10: Air Quality A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY The different alternatives being evaluated as part of the Manhattan East Side Transit Alternatives Study have the potential to result in air quality
More informationGDOT-Office of Planning Update
GDOT-Office of Planning Update GAMPO Conference Athens, Georgia Matthew Fowler, PTP Assistant Planning Administrator November 30, 2010 AGENDA Atlanta Region Managed Lane System Plan I-85 HOV to HOT Conversion
More informationHOV-TO-HOT CONVERSION SOCIOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT: ATLANTA I-85 HOV-TO-HOT CONVERSION
0 0 0 HOV-TO-HOT CONVERSION SOCIOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT: ATLANTA I- HOV-TO-HOT CONVERSION Authors: Sara Khoeini* Graduate Research Assistant School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute
More informationAppendix L Greenhouse Gas 4-part Strategy
Appendix L Greenhouse Gas 4-part Strategy Supplementary information regarding options for further reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the Puget Sound region State and Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions
More informationPRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY Technical Report Documentation Page
PRELIMINARY REVIEW COPY Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. Preliminary Review Copy 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle GIS-Integrated Traffic Input
More informationGetting Started. A Workshop for Local Partners. Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations SESSION 1 Welcome and Introductions Workshop Objectives Develop an understanding
More informationAir Report. Project Information PPTA/LAP. Traffic Data I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE. Project Number: , C501, P101 UPC:
Air Report Project Information Project Name: I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE Project Number: 0495-029-123, C501, P101 UPC: 105130 Route Number: 495 Project Limit - From: South of Old Dominion Drive
More informationIMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT
IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT WTS San Antonio/SWITE Professional Development Seminar Jenny Narvaez, Principal Air Quality Planner North Central Texas Council of Governments August 4, 2017
More informationA Comparative Analysis of Occupancy Data Collectors for the User Profile of the I-85 HOV-to-HOT Conversion
A Comparative Analysis of Occupancy Data Collectors for the User Profile of the I-85 HOV-to-HOT Conversion A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by D. Kemp Edwards In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
More information9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT
9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT To examine the existing transportation system and accurately predict impacts of future growth, a travel demand model is necessary. A travel demand model is a computer
More informationUsing MOVES to Estimate On-Road Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Consumption
Using MOVES to Estimate On-Road Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Consumption NTAQS August 7 th, 2012 Chris Dresser U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Overview of Presentation EPA s MOVES GHG Guidance
More informationAir Quality Technical Report PM2.5 Quantitative Hot spot Analysis. A. Introduction. B. Interagency Consultation
Air Quality Technical Report PM2.5 Quantitative Hot spot Analysis I 65, SR44 to Southport Road (Segmented from SR44 to Main Street and Main Street to Southport Road) A. Introduction This technical report
More informationOKI S CONFORMITY PROCESS
AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION FOR THE OKI 2040 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND THE AMENDED OKI FY 2018 FY2021 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (AMENDMENT 9C) FOR THE KENTUCKY PORTION OF THE
More informationDatabase and Travel Demand Model
Database and Travel Demand Model 7 The CMP legislation requires every CMA, in consultation with the regional transportation planning agency (the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the Bay
More informationIntersection management: air quality impacts
Intersection management: air quality impacts M. El-Fadel/') H. Sbayti,^ M. Abou Najm^^ Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, American AW For/r, 7V7 70022, EMail: mfadel@aub.edu. Ib ^ Department
More informationHigh Emitter Light Duty Vehicle Contributions to On-road Mobile Emissions in 2018 and 2030
Vol. 2, No. 1; August 2015 ISSN 2330-2038 E-ISSN 2330-2046 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://set.redfame.com High Emitter Light Duty Vehicle Contributions to On-road Mobile Emissions in 2018
More information6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Chapter 6 Air Quality 6.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a project-level analysis of the potential for air quality impacts that could result from mobile and stationary sources of air emissions generated
More informationAPPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS Travel demand models (TDM) simulate current travel conditions and forecast future travel patterns and conditions based on planned system improvements
More informationAssociation for Commuter Transportation Recommendations to USDOT on MAP-21 Performance Measures
Association for Commuter Transportation 1341 G Street, NW, 10th Floor Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.719.5331 www.actweb.org Association for Commuter Transportation Recommendations to USDOT on MAP-21 Performance
More informationTransportation Conformity Guidance for Qualitative Hot-spot Analyses in PM 2.5 and PM 10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas
Transportation Conformity Guidance for Qualitative Hot-spot Analyses in PM 2.5 and PM 10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas United States Environmental Protection Agency Federal Highway Administration
More informationTraffic Data Collection Programs for PM 2.5 Non-Attainment Areas
Traffic Data Collection Programs for PM 2.5 Non-Attainment Areas Jack Stickel Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities NATMEC 23 June, 2010 Traffic Data to Address Air Quality and Climate
More information6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS 6.1 MODEL RUN SUMMARY NOTEBOOK The Model Run Summary Notebook (under separate cover) provides documentation of the multiple
More informationWood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission (WWW-IPC) PM 2.5 Air Quality Conformity Determination Report [2005]
Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission (WWW-IPC) PM 2.5 Air Quality Conformity Determination Report [2005] [Technical Report-Summary] Prepared by Sreevatsa Nippani, Transportation Specialist,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER. Executive Summary Why Variable Pricing? What Was Studied? User Surveys Air Quality Analysis User And Equity Analysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Executive Summary Why Variable Pricing? What Was Studied? User Surveys Air Quality Analysis User And Equity Analysis Findings Scenario 1 Base Case Scenario 2 Detoll Scenario
More informationCFIRE. Evaluation of Green House Gas Emissions Models. CFIRE November 2014
Evaluation of Green House Gas Emissions Models CFIRE CFIRE 02-24 November 2014 National Center for Freight & Infrastructure Research & Education Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College
More informationTransform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016
Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016 The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the Transform 66: Inside the Beltway Project directs NVTC to
More informationVEHICLE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS ANALYSIS
VEHICLE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS ANALYSIS Prepared for ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION MPOs/COGs AIR QUALITY POLICY AND LOCAL PROGRAMS SECTION AND YUMA METROPOLITAN PLANNING
More informationEvaluation and Sensitivity Analysis of MOVES Input Data Submitted for the 2011 National Emissions Inventory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 14-2989 Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis of MOVES Input Data Submitted
More informationAppendix E. Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Appendix E Air Quality Conformity Analysis AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FOR THE DRAFT 2019-2022 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INTRODUCTION This paper documents the positive air quality
More informationTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REPORT WAYS TO ESTIMATE SPEEDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSES. John S. Miller Senior Research Scientist
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REPORT WAYS TO ESTIMATE SPEEDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSES John S. Miller Senior Research Scientist Brian Park Faculty Research Scientist G. Michael Fitch Senior
More informationFinal Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation
Glossary The following glossary defines common transit terminology, adapted from the American Public Transit Association Glossary of Transit inology (1994). Accessibility Alternative Fuels A.M. Peak Base
More informationAnalysis of Transportation Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in Massachusetts Using the EERPAT Tool
Analysis of Transportation Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in Massachusetts Using the EERPAT Tool Christopher D. Porter, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400, Cambridge,
More informationFreight Transportation Planning and Modeling Spring 2012
Freight Model Validation Techniques Abstract Several reviews of validation techniques for statewide passenger and freight models have been published over the past several years. In this paper I synthesize
More informationCongestion Management Process 2013 Update
OVERVIEW OF THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS Traffic Congestion In The Dallas-Fort Worth Region With the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) urban area as its center, the North Central Texas region
More informationChapter 6 CO, PM 10, and Other Pollutant Air Quality Impacts and Mitigation For Project Operation
Chapter 6 CO, PM 10, and Other Pollutant Air Quality Impacts and Mitigation For Project Operation 6.1 Introduction This Chapter addresses the recommended techniques for quantifying emissions of carbon
More informationANNEX 3 Methodological Descriptions for Additional Source or Sink Categories
ANNEX 3 Methodological Descriptions for Additional Source or Sink Categories 3.1. Methodology for Estimating Emissions of CH4, N2O, and Indirect Greenhouse Gases from Stationary Combustion Estimates of
More informationTransportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links
Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links Reference Bok, D. (2018). Transportation policy and planning. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/courses/transportation-policy-and-planning Transportation
More informationEVALUATION OF THIRD-PARTY TRAVEL TIME DATA IN TALLAHASSEE, FL
EVALUATION OF THIRD-PARTY TRAVEL TIME DATA IN TALLAHASSEE, FL Charles R. Lattimer, PE, PMP Group Manager, Atkins North America 482 S. Keller Rd. Orlando FL 32810 (407) 806-4287, charles.lattimer@atkinsglobal.com
More information5.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
5. NEPA 5.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions For a comprehensive discussion of the Project s affected environment and cumulative impacts as it relates to air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor
STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor Rebecca Otto State Auditor METRO TRANSIT MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 Description of the Office of the
More informationBENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS FOR ANAHEIM TIGER APPLICATION
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS FOR ANAHEIM TIGER APPLICATION Report Prepared by System Metrics under contract with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) August 2009 This document provides a
More informationThe Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016
The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas Public Meetings January 2016 Presentation Agenda Mobility 2040 Draft Recommendations 2016 Transportation Conformity RTC Policy Bundle Concept
More informationCongestion Management Process in the US A Federal Requirement
Congestion Management Process in the US A Federal Requirement ITS Argentina November 6, 2013 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Outline of Seminar Discussion of Congestion
More informationKAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary Page E-1 Introduction KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) and the Kansas Turnpike Authority (KTA) have both recognized the need to plan for the
More informationYellowstone National Park Winter Use Plan. Air Quality Analysis of Snowmobile and Snowcoach Emissions
Yellowstone National Park 2004-05 Winter Use Plan Air Quality Analysis of Snowmobile and Snowcoach Emissions July 29, 2004 Air Resource Specialists 1901 Sharp Point Drive, Suite E Fort Collins, Colorado
More informationA Roadmap to MOVES2004
Air and Radiation EPA420-S-05-002 March 2005 A Roadmap to MOVES2004 EPA420-S-05-002 March 2005 A Roadmap to MOVES2004 The MOVES Team Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality
More informationI 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT February 2016 INTERSTATE 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION PROJECT Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia
More informationAIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS: VISUALIZE 2045 SCOPE OF WORK
December 14, 2017 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS: VISUALIZE 2045 SCOPE OF WORK I. INTRODUCTION Projects solicited for the quadrennial update of the region s transportation plan, Visualize 2045, and the
More informationProject Summary. AMPO Air Quality Work Group. Rich Denbow. April 27-28, presented to. presented by
NCHRP 25-38, Input Guidelines for MOVES Project Summary presented to AMPO Air Quality Work Group presented by Rich Denbow April 27-28, 2015 Objectives and Products Objective» Produce guidelines for transportation
More informationPRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003
PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR TO THE MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP NOVEMBER 25, 2003 Outline Motivations Distance-based pricing Congestion pricing Overview Scheme types Technology
More informationRiverside New Urbanism Project
Riverside New Urbanism Project Task 2.2 Neighborhood Traffic and Air Pollution Modeling Final Report By Ji Luo Kanok Boriboonsomsin College of Engineering - Center for Environmental Research and Technology
More informationEnvironmental Consequences and Mitigation
Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation 4.1 Introduction This chapter provides a detailed description of the impacts (and indirect impacts where applicable) associated with the alternatives
More informationCHAPTER 11. Air Quality and the Transportation Plan
Chapter 11. Air Quality and the Transportation Plan 159 CHAPTER 11. Air Quality and the Transportation Plan Background Air quality in Anchorage is subject to national ambient air quality standards established
More informationBenefit-Cost Analysis Documentation
Benefit-Cost Analysis Documentation Hyannis Access II: Project Matrix Current Status & Problem to be Addressed Heavily traveled roadway between the region s limited access highway and its largest commercial
More information4.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
4.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Federal agencies are required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to ensure that projects they fund (such as the Center City Connector) are in compliance with existing federal
More informationMOBILITICS. Scenario Planning and Modeling Connected & Automated Vehicles. June 12, 2018
MOBILITICS Scenario Planning and Modeling Connected & Automated Vehicles June 12, 2018 Connected and Automated Vehicles are everywhere. Light Duty (personal or shared) Shuttles Bus Freight Parcel Delivery
More informationImpacts of temporary traffic control measures on vehicular emissions during the Asian Games in Guangzhou, China
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ISSN: 1096-2247 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uawm20 Impacts of temporary traffic control measures on vehicular emissions
More informationCharlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis. Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Charlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA October 23, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EVALUATION PROCESS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCongestion Management Process (CMP)
Congestion Management Process (CMP) Introduction The Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a systematic, data-driven, and regionally accepted approach that aims to improve the performance of the transportation
More informationMARC Congestion Management Process Policy
MARC Congestion Management Process Policy Adopted by the MARC Board of Directors on May 24, 2011 Background Traffic congestion can be generally defined as a condition where the volume of users on a transportation
More informationAir Quality Conformity Analysis Report NEPA MPO (Carbon County) 2015 TIP
Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report NEPA MPO (Carbon County) The Northeastern Pennsylvania Alliance (NEPA) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Portion of the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pennsylvania
More informationINTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016
INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016 INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION Air Quality Analysis Technical Report City of Alexandria,
More informationUK Road Pricing Feasibility Study: Modelling the Impacts Elizabeth Cox 1 UK
Abstract UK Road Pricing Feasibility Study: Modelling the Impacts Elizabeth Cox 1 UK In July 2003, the UK government set up a comprehensive study to examine how a new system of charging for road use could
More information18 June 2017 PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK AASHTO ADDRESSING AIR QUALITY ISSUES IN THE NEPA PROCESS FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS
AASHTO PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK 18 June 2017 ADDRESSING AIR QUALITY ISSUES IN THE NEPA PROCESS FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS This handbook is intended to assist practitioners in addressing air quality issues, including
More informationAppendix D. Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report
Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report Appendix D Travel Demand Model & Post Processing Methodology & Assumptions Technical Memorandum FINAL AUGUST 2016 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
More informationOverview of U.S EPA New Generation Emission Model: MOVES Suriya Vallamsundar 1 and Jane Lin 2 1
ACEEE Int. J. on Transportation and Urban Development, Vol. 01, No. 01, Apr 2011 Overview of U.S EPA New Generation Emission Model: MOVES Suriya Vallamsundar 1 and Jane Lin 2 1 University of Illinois at
More informationAppendix C. Emissions Inventory Documentation
Emissions Inventory Documentation Emissions Inventory Documentation i Great Smoky Mountains National Park, NC 8-Hour Ozone July 24, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE... 1-1 2.0 OVERALL
More informationReal-World CO 2 Impacts of Traffic Congestion
Barth/Boriboonsomsin 1 Real-World CO 2 Impacts of Traffic Congestion Matthew Barth College of Engineering - Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California at Riverside 184 Columbia
More informationI-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA
15th International Conference on Managed Lanes I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA Case Study for Funding of Transit Service and Transportation Demand Management
More informationThe Regional Transportation Plan Appendix D. Regional Air Quality Conformity Analysis. Puget Sound Regional Council.
The 2018 Appendix D Regional Air Quality Conformity Analysis May 2018 Puget Sound Regional Council May 2018 Funding for this document provided in part by member jurisdictions, grants from U.S. Department
More informationTriad Air Quality Conformity Determination Report 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
Triad Air Quality Conformity Determination Report 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan; and 2016-2020 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (Guilford
More informationOrigin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices
Origin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices presented by César A. Segovia, AICP Senior Transportation Planner AECOM September 17, 2015 Today s Webinar Content Matrix Estimation Data sources Florida Application
More informationDec 20, 2007 Operations Performance Measures Conference Call
Dec 20, 2007 Operations Performance Measures Conference Call Required Accuracy of Measures Performance Measure Traffic Engineering Transportation Planning Applications Traffic Management OPERATIONS Traveler
More informationExamining the Economic Trade-offs of Alternative Transportation Funding NC I-95 Economic Assessment
Examining the Economic Trade-offs of Alternative Transportation Funding NC I-95 Economic Assessment presented to ITED Conference presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Paula Dowell, PhD April 2014 Background
More informationAppendix 17. Pre-Analysis Consensus Template
Appendix 17 Pre-Analysis Consensus Template 1 1. Reason for the transportation conformity regional emissions analysis beginning 02/2013 (Check those boxes that apply and provide a brief explanation in
More informationRULE 206 MOBILE AND TRANSPORTATION SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS Adopted (Amended ) INDEX
RULE 206 MOBILE AND TRANSPORTATION SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS Adopted 12-15-92 (Amended 12-05-96) 100 GENERAL 101 PURPOSE 102 APPLICABILITY 103 SEVERABILITY INDEX 200 DEFINITIONS 201 ACTUAL EMISSION
More informationHighest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP
Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP The following list of measures are the highest priority performance measures as identified by modal working groups. These groups consist of staff from
More informationCritical Issues for Transportation Policy And Finance The Second William O. Lipinski Symposium on Transportation Policy
Critical Issues for Transportation Policy And Finance The Second William O. Lipinski Symposium on Transportation Policy Martin Wachs, Director Transportation, Space & Technology The RAND Corporation Many
More informationUC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research
UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research Title Real-World CO2 Impacts of Traffic Congestion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4fx9g4gn Authors Barth, Matthew Boriboonsomsin, Kanok Publication Date
More informationTable Ambient Criteria Air Pollutant Monitoring Data ( )
Section 5.4 Air Quality and Climate Change This section describes the potential air quality and climate change impacts associated with the proposed changes to the approved project. This section supplements
More information