Sung-Sik Moon, Director General Department of Environmental Policy Cooperation

Transcription

1 Sung-Sik Moon, Director General Department of Environmental Policy Cooperation

2 Table of Contents I. KEITI Introduction II. National R&D for Wastes to Energy III. Domestic Waste Management Policy 2

3 I. KEITI Introduction 3

4 I. KEITI introduction HR Budge 430 employees USD 390 Million 4

5 I. KEITI introduction Key Functions and Programs Environmental Technology R&D Environmental Technology (R&D) Planning, Evaluation, Management Train professionals and provide information Train environmental Industry Technical professional and Create Jobs Collect Environmental Industry, Technical Information, Utilization and Education, PR Certification Evaluation Operate Environmental Mark, Carbon Achievement Carbon score label Certification ㆍ verification environmental technology and certification of green technology Develop environmental industry Develop environmental industry and support expansion to overseas market Environment loan, Eco-friendly creative economy center 5 overseas offices operation Distribute eco-friendly business models Promote green product life Promote eco-friendly management and low carbon management by company Support environmental health safety management Relieve environmental damage and manage chemical materials Manage eco-friendly product, support environmental health ㆍ safety for the vulnerable social group 5

6 I. KEITI introduction KEITI s overseas cooperation 414 environmental cooperation projects in 75 countries (2015) Master Plan 20 countries 19 projects Feasibility Study 52 countries 137 projects Joint International Localization 23 countries 245 projects Market Pioneering 13 countries Russia Canada Ireland U.K France Algeria Ghana Angola Germany Romania Turkmenistan Switzerland Bangladesh Bulgaria Uzbekistan Mongolia Italy China Azerbaijan Turkey Tunisia Iran 20.5% China Japan Libya Kuwait UAE Saudi Arabia India Pakistan Cambodia Asia Thailand Vietnam Nigeria Conggo 28.3% Philippines Malaysia Sri Lanka Tanzania Indonesia Middle East /Afirca 34.5% Mozambique Australia 10.7% USA/Japan/Europe USA Mexico Central South America Nicaragua Colombia 5.9% Peru Brazil Chile 6

7 II. National R&D for Energy from Wastes 7

8 II. R&D for Energy from Wastes Waste treatment policy in Korea Reduction(Control of waste) Reuse and Recycle Recovery(Energy resources) Safe treatment : Promote to reduce CO 2 and zero waste by building a waste treatment system (4R) Resource Recirculation Society for climate change Zero Waste CO 2 reduction Reduction (Control of Waste) Reuse Recycle Recovery (Waste to Energy) Safe treatment 8

9 (Million US$) II. R&D for Energy from Wastes Waste to energy R&D Budget Total budget : 80 million USD Government grant : 50 million USD Private fund : 30 million USD(Industry 15 million USD, Beneficiary 15 million USD) 100 Grant from Government Matching from Industry Matching from Beneficiary Solid Fuel Hazardous Wastes Gaseous Fuel Aqueous Fuel Administration cost Sum 9

10 II. R&D for Energy from Wastes Major Projects Organic Sludge Food Wastes Livestock Wastes S o l i d F u e l 20 ton/d G a s e o u s F u e l 80 ton/d Oder treatment P e l l e t s Mixed incineration Oder treatment M e t h a n e Waste water C o m p o s t Waste Woods A q u e o u s F u e l 10 ton/d B u t a n o l <Future> HM-bearing Sludge D e t o x i f i c a t i o n M a t e r i a l s R e c o v e r y 10

11 II. R&D for Energy from Wastes Step-wise Goals Phase I Phase II Phase III Solid Fuel Gaseous Fuel Aqueous Fuel 2013~2015 (3 yr) 2016~2018 (3 yr) 2019~2021 (2yr) 에너지절감기술개발 건조장치실증설비운전최적화 고체연료특성평가 (Bio-SRF 기준 ) 폐열회수시스템적용으로에너지자립화구축 통합공정최적화 / 기술영업 실증시스템과단위설비의국산화및해외수출상품화 경제성및사업화타당성추가분석 Building Test Bed 2014~ ~ ~2021 Integration of Best Available Technologies 중금속함유폐수슬러지건조장치 Pilot 규모장치설계및제작 EPC-Commercial Scale 중금속슬러지용융장치실증시설제작및운전최적화 실증시스템과단위설비의국산 Completion of World- 화및해외수출상품화 경제성 Class 및사업화 EPC-O&M 타당성추가분석 2013~ ~ ~2021 하이브리드혐기소화적용성연구 실증시설설계 / 시공 / 시운전 혐기소화운전인자확보 Improved O&M Technology Advancement Innovation of Key Technologies Accepting Orders from Domestic Market 원료성상및부하변동대응운전기술확립 통합공정최적화 / 기술영업 in developing country Technology Accepting Orders from 실증시스템과단위설비의국산화 Overseas 및해외수출 Market O&M 기술상품화 11

12 II. R&D for Energy from Wastes Construction of Test Beds KEITI is building 1.5 ha size of test beds for waste to energy R&D project and we will operate the facilities from this year KEITI would like to build a waste to energy test bed to overseas from

13 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy 13

14 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Stepwise technologies for waste treatment in Korea Waste Discharge & Collection Waste Pre-treatment Middle processing of waste Waste to energy Final Disposal Separate waste discharge & collection Automatic waste collection system Volume-based Waste Fee System Waste Recycling Demolition waste Separation & Sorting Incinerators MBT Pyrolysis Combustible Waste to Energy Organic Waste to Gas Energy LFG Power Bioreactor Sanitary Landfill Maintenance & Restoration of non-sanitary landfill Sustainable landfill 14

15 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Reduction of waste generation Reduced waste generation per capita - Municipal waste discarded daily in 2014 per capita was 47% less than that of Germany 1.671kg/day, Japan 0.959kg/day, UK 1.342kg/day(2012) This is remarkable change of waste treatment method - (Landfill) 53.4%(1994) 9.3%(2014) - (Recycle) 42.7%(1994) 84.4%(2014) - (Incineration) 4.1%(1994) 6.3%(2014) Others 3,044 (0.8%) Recycle 322,419 (84.4%) Landfill 33,698(9.3%) Incineration 22,848(6.0%) Per capita 2.3kg/day Per capita 0.95kg/day <Waste treated in 2014> 15

16 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Volume-based Waste Fee System Korean government had introduced the Volume-based Waste Fee System in 1995 Based on the polluter pays principle, they should purchase discharger of nonrecyclable garbage and pay waste treatment cost in proportion to its amount Polluter should be put in plastic bag purchased in advance, and discharged at the place and time designated by local governments The 10L cost of household plastic garbage bag is USD 20 cents and total payment of the garbage bag was USD 458 Million in % of administrate districts had implemented the system in 2013 Discarded bags, 21,413 ton/day, are collected by local government or its contractor, then mostly incinerated or land filled 16

17 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Volume-based Waste Fee System The discharge of recyclable waste is free Paid Free of charge 17

18 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Volume-based Waste Fee System Since ban on direct landfill from 2005, most of food waste is recycled for feedstuffs, compost or biogas production at public or private facilities. Should be separated from other waste and discarded in accordance with local regulations. (free or charged) Volume-based charge system is applied at all area since

19 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Advantages and disadvantages of waste treatment technologies To build Resource Recirculation Society, Waste to Energy Activities have been under study and commercially utilized Process Advantage Disadvantage Incinerator (WTE) Refuse Derived Fuel Organic Waste to Biogas Landfill Gas to Energy Bioreactor + LFG Energy (Improved LFG Utilization) Decrease of Final Waste Sanitary Treatment Energy Recovery (Heat + Power) Combustible Waste Recycling Energy Recovery CH 4 Production (To be used as fuel) Sludge to Compost GHGs Reduction (CH 4 Utilization) Energy Recovery (Heat + Power) More GHGs Reduction(CH 4 Utilization) More Energy Recovery(Heat + Power) Landfill Early Stabilization High Construction and O&M Cost Not economical (Low Yield & low sales cost) Difficult in Control High Cost & Technology Irregular LFG Production Added bioreactor system Cost 19

20 III. Domestic Waste Management Policy Cost comparison in each technology Comparison of Construction Cost in South Korea (Capacity of treatment : 1,000ton/day) Process Incineration RDF Landfill Gas to Energy Bioreactor + LFG Energy Construction Cost(USD/30y) 600 million (Excl. Landfill construction) 200 million (Excl. Landfill construction) Energy Recovery(%) 120 million 5 ~ million 7 ~ 15 Endurance Period(year) Total Operating Cost(USD) Days of operation(day/year) 20 ~ million ~ million (Depends on the site size) (During +After operation) million million (During +After operation) 365 UNFCCC s CDM projects of LFG Country No. Business item Registration date Reduction (tco 2 e/y) IRR (%) Including CER Peru 708 Huaycoloro landfill gas capture and combustion , China 887 Shenzhen Xiaping Landfill Gas Collection and Utilization Project , Mexico 1123 Ciudad Juarez Landfill Gas to Energy Project , Korea 941 Sudokwon Landfill Gas Electricity Generation Project ,210,

21