CITY OF PITTSBURG DEVELOPMENT OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CITY OF PITTSBURG DEVELOPMENT OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES"

Transcription

1

2 FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT CITY OF PITTSBURG DEVELOPMENT OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES April 2005 Prepared by: 201 North Civic Drive, Suite 115 Walnut Creek, California

3 March 28, 2005 Mr. Walter Pease Assistant Director Public Works City of Pittsburg 65 Civic Avenue Pittsburg, CA Subject: Final Administrative Draft Report of the Development of Water and Sewer Facility Reserve Charges Dear Mr. Pease: In accordance with our November 2003 agreement, we have prepared a report that documents the development of water and sewer facility reserve charges. Forty (40) copies of the draft report are enclosed. In the report, we have developed facility reserve charges recommended for implementation beginning in Fiscal Year 2005/06. The report also includes extensive data in the appendices that allows quick reference to information that was provided by the City and used in the development of charges. If you have any questions, please call me at Very truly yours, BROWN AND CALDWELL Tom Pavletic Senior Consultant Enclosures

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1. CHAPTER 2. CHAPTER 3. INTRODUCTION WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES APPENDIX A. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS APPENDIX B. APPENDIX C. APPENDIX D. APPENDIX E. APPENDIX F. GASB 34 COMPLIANCE REPORT WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATES WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND PAYMENT SCHEDULES ASSESSMENTS AND REDEVELOPMENT FUNDING SEWER MASTER PLAN LAND USE DATA i

5 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Water System Replacement Cost (2003 Dollars) Table 2.2 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (2004 Dollars) Table 2.3 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (Adjusted Dollars) Table 2.4 SW Hills CIP Capacity Allocation Table 2.5 SW Hills CIP Cost Allocation Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects Table 2.7 Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds Table 2.8 Water Distribution Facility Reserve Charge Table 2.9 Water Treatment Plant Facility Reserve Charge Table 2.10 SE 20-inch Transmission Main Facility Reserve Charge Table 2.11 Zone I/II Reservoir Facility Reserve Charge Table 2.12a SW Hills Debt Service Allocation Table 2.12b SW Hills Project Cost Allocation Table 2.13a SW Hills Debt Service by Project Phase Table 2.13b SW Hills Project Cost by Project Phase Table 2.14a SW Hills Phase I/II Project Debt Service Table 2.14b SW Hills Phase I/II Project Costs Table 2.15a SW Hills Phase III Project Debt Service Table 2.15b SW Hills Phase III Project Costs Table 2.16a SW Hills All Phases Project Debt Service Table 2.16b SW Hills All Phases Project Costs Table 2.17a FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (Debt Service for SW Hills) Table 2.17b FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (Project Costs for SW Hills) Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Table 2.19 Water FRC Survey of Single Family Residential Connections Table 3.1 Sewer CIP Projects Table 3.2 Sewer Collection System Facility Reserve Charge Table 3.3 Collection System Capacity Expansion CIP Table 3.4 FY 2005/06 Sewer FRC for Single Family Residential Table 3.5 Sewer FRC Survey of Single Family Residential Connections Table 3.6 Recommended Sewer Facility Reserve Charges ii

6 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF TABLES IN APPENDIX Appendix A Government Code Section Appendix B Water System Structures as of 2003 Appendix B Water System Pipelines as of 2003 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Appendix C Water Treatment Facilities' Costs Developed by Brown and Caldwell Appendix D Pittsburg Water Revenue Bonds Appendix D Pittsburg Sewer Revenue Bonds Appendix E Assessments and RDA Funding Appendix F Sewer Existing Land Use Appendix F Sewer Ultimate Land Use iii

7 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Current Water Facility Reserve Charges Figure 2.2 Development of Water FRCs Figure 2.3 Water Pressure Zones Figure 2.4 FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (SW Hills Debt Service) Figure 2.5 FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (SW Hills No Debt Service) Figure 2.6 Water FRC Survey for Single Family Residential Figure 3.1 Development of Sewer FRCs Figure 3.2 Sewer Sub-Basins Figure 3.3 FY 2005/06 Sewer FRC for Single Family Residential Figure 3.4 Sewer FRC Survey for Single Family Residential iv

8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The consulting team acknowledges the assistance of the following City staff: John Fuller Dean Hegewald Walter Pease Thua Pham Joe Sbranti Marie Simons The consulting team comprised the following participants: Linda Blemberg Tom Pavletic Susan Sicora Marv Winer v

9 ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS BC Brown and Caldwell CCF Hundred cubic feet; equal to 748 gallons (also HCF) CIP Capital improvement program ESFDU Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Unit FY Fiscal year (July 1 to June 30) FY 2005/06 July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 GPM Gallons per minute MGD Million gallons per day O&M Operation and maintenance SFR Single family residential PLEASE TAKE NOTE This report is intended to provide general discussion of the subject matter covered. To the extent it addresses laws, regulations or court decisions of any jurisdiction, it is not intended as a precise, detailed or thorough summary of the pertinent legal authorities. The reader should note that this report was not prepared by an attorney or reviewed by an attorney during preparation, and it is not intended, and should not be relied upon, as legal advice. Its purpose is to assist in the recognition and analysis of public policy issues. Questions concerning the interpretation or applicability of the legal authorities referenced herein should be referred to an attorney qualified in the specific subject matter. vi

10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents the development and justification in support of the City s Water and Sewer Facility Reserve Charges (FRCs). The Facility Reserve Charges are intended to recover a portion of the City s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) cost, and utility rate payers prior investment in capital facilities that support land development through utility system expansion. Facility Reserve Charge Regulatory Requirements A facility reserve charge is a charge to pay for public agencies facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed or to pay for new facilities that will be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged (new development or increases to existing service capacity). The facility reserve charges that are developed meet the regulatory requirements found in Government Code Section et sequentia regarding the establishment of capacity charges. 1 The development of FRCs also meet the policies stated in the City of Pittsburg s General Plan (GP) adopted October Specifically, GP Policy 3-P-11 states that the City should Review and update the City s development impact fee schedule to ensure that new development pays its proportional share of the costs associated with the provision of facilities for police, parks, water, sewer, storm drainage, and schools. The FRCs ensure that growth pays for growth by allocating the cost of new facilities and the cost of unused capacity in existing facilities to new development while allocating the cost of repairing and refurbishing facilities used by current customers to sewer and water utility rates. Current Facility Reserve Charges The City has separate FRCs for both its water and sewer utilities. Current water facility reserve charges are shown in Figure ES.1. Water facility reserve charges are based upon the size of the water meter for nonresidential customers. Water facility reserve charges for residential connections are based on the number of individual living units being connected to the system. The City last increased its water facility reserve charges in FY 2000/01 based on a multi-year study completed in The increase in FY 2000/01 raised the water FRC for single family residential connections by 23 percent from $534 to $656. The current sewer facility reserve charge is $300 per single family unit and $150 per multiple family unit. Sewer facility reserve charges for nonresidential customers are based upon the estimated volume of wastewater discharge. The City has not increased its sewer facility reserve charge since The terms facility reserve charge, as used by the City, and capacity charge, as defined in the Government Code, are synonymous. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-1

11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.1 Current Water Facility Reserve Charges Facility Equivalency Reserve Nonresidential ($ per meter) Factor * Charge 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $656 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $656 1-inch meter 2.5 $1, /2-inch meter 5.0 $3,280 2-inch meter 8.0 $5,248 3-inch meter 16.0 $10,496 4-inch meter 25.0 $16,400 6-inch meter 50.0 $32,800 8-inch meter 90.0 $59, inch meter $95, inch meter $141,040 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling 5/8-inch or $656 Duplex (per unit) 3/4-inch meters $656 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $470 * An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Water Facility Reserve Charge Development The pattern of development in the City during the next 20 years, leading to its ultimate built-out condition, will define the expansion of the water system. Those CIP projects that are of benefit to new development were identified. Capacity available in the City s water distribution system and in the City s water treatment plant that is available to serve new development was also identified. The City also recognized that new development could be categorized by areas according to CIP projects that benefit new development. For these areas, Figure ES.2 shows a matrix of the water pressure zones with the corresponding categories of capital facility projects. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-2

12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.2 Areas of the City with Similar Benefits from Water Capital Facilities Projects Capital Facilities Generalized Benefit Area Specific Benefit Water Water SE 20-inch Zone I/II SW Hills Area Distribution Treatment Trans Line Reservoir CIP (a) SW Hills (All Zones) X X Zones I and II; not SW Hills X X X X Zone III; not SW Hills X X X Note: a. The SW Hills CIP includes transmission lines, storage facilities and pump stations that benefit only developments in that area. Existing and proposed pressure zones higher than Zone II (Zones III VI) benefit very specific areas. The following sections summarize which facilities are included in the FRC. Water Facilities of Area Specific Benefit Included in the FRC Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area will benefit from a planned, new Zone II and II Pump Station and transmission lines and all structures and pipelines for facilities in Zone IV, Zone V and Zone VI. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from a planned, new 20- inch transmission line and a new Zone I/II Reservoir. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from a planned, new 20-inch transmission line. Water Facilities of Generalized Benefit Included in the FRC Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant. The cost of capacity for the water treatment plant is included in the FRC. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant and capacity in the water distribution system. The cost of capacity for the water treatment plant and the cost of capacity for the water distribution system are included in the FRC. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant and capacity in the water distribution system. The cost of capacity for the water treatment plant and the cost of capacity for the water distribution system are included in the FRC. The level of development in each area is summarized below. Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area is projected to add 8,877 dwelling units to the City s water system. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area is projected to add 3,052 dwelling units to the City s water system. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area is projected to add 702 dwelling units to the City s water system. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-3

13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A unit cost for construction or reimbursement of the capital facilities for each area of the City was developed and is discussed in the following paragraphs. A summary of the unit costs is shown in Figure ES.3 (units are denominated in dollars for a single family dwelling unit). The unit costs applicable to each area are totaled to produce a facility reserve charge for each area. Figure ES.3 Unit Costs for Water Facility Reserve Charges, FY 2005/06 Southwest Hills Development Areas Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Zones I and II; not SW Hills Zone III; not SW Hills West Pitts/Bay San Marco San Marco Bailey Water Facility Reserve Charge Alves Oak Hills Coast Point San Marco Hills Meadows Estates Smith Current Facility Reserve Charges $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges Distribution na na na na na na na na na na $980 $980 WTP $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 Zone I/II Reservoir na na na na na na na na na na $2,990 na SE 20-inch Trans Main na na na na na na na na na na $2,360 $2,360 SW Hills CIP, Phase I/II $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 na na SW Hills CIP, Phase III $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 na na Total Water FRC $9,820 $930 $7,800 $9,310 $6,510 $4,920 $6,080 $4,310 $4,130 $6,290 $7,120 $4,130 Water FRC Survey for Single Family Residential The facility reserve charges of other nearby communities was compared to the current and projected charges for the City of Pittsburg. The results of the survey are shown in Figure ES.4. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-4

14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.4 Water FRC Survey for Single Family Residential CCWD $10,134 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Alves) $9,820 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Zones I & II; not SW Hills $7,120 $4,460 Martinez $5,300 $4,460 Antioch $4,560 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Smith) $4,130 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Zone III; not SW Hills $4,130 $4,460 City or Local Portion Pittsburg, Current $656 $4,460 CCWD Raw Water Portion $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Note: The CCWD Fee for Untreated (Raw) Water Wholesale Municipal Service applies to meters outside the Contra Costa Water District. CCWD fees shown for each City are for a 5/8-inch meter in Service Area A. Sewer Facility Reserve Charge Development The pattern of development in the City during the next 20 years, leading to its ultimate built-out condition, will define the expansion of the sewer system. Those CIP projects that are of benefit to new development were identified in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. Capacity available in the City s sewer system was identified. The City also recognized that new development could be categorized by CIP projects that benefit new development in specific areas. A matrix showing the sewer sub-basins with similar benefits from capital facilities and the categories of capital facility projects is shown in Figure ES.5. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-5

15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.5 Sewer Sub-Basins with Similar Benefits from Capital Facilities Projects Capital Facilities Existing Expanded Collection Collection Area System System Sewer Sub-basins SW (a) (a) Sewer Sub-basins DS & SW109 X X All Other Sewer Sub-basins X (b) Note: a. Developer(s) are anticipated to install a new collection system and connect the new system directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor. b. New development in these sub-basins is expected to consist primarily of infill and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. The areas of the City with similar benefits from capital facilities are summarized below. Sewer Sub-basins SW Capital facilities for this area, located west of Oak Hills, will be constructed exclusively by developer(s) for the benefit of new development in that area and are anticipated not to utilize any of the existing system capacity. Therefore, no sewer FRC will be developed or proposed for adoption for this area. Sewer Sub-basins DS & SW109. This area is projected to add the equivalent of 1,525 single family dwelling units to the City s sewer system. The estimated number of new dwelling units is shown in Appendix F. This area will benefit from capital projects designed to add capacity to transmit wastewater from the new development to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District system and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. All Other Sewer Sub-basins. New development in these sub-basins is expected to consist primarily of infill and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. A summary of the unit costs is shown in Figure ES.6. The unit costs applicable to each area are totaled to produce a facility reserve charge for each area. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-6

16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.6 Unit Costs for Sewer Facility Reserve Charges, FY 2005/06 Sewer Sub-basins SW (a) Sewer Sub-basins DS and SW109 All Other Sewer Sub-basins Current Facility Reserve Charges (b) $300 $300 $300 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges (b) Existing Collection System (c) na $2,650 $2,650 Expanded Collection System na $1,680 na Total Wastewater Facility Reserve Charge $0 $4,330 $2,650 Notes: a. The developer(s) of Sewer Sub-basins SW are anticpated to construct their own collection system and connect directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor. b. In addition to the City Facility Reserve Charges, Delta Diablo Sanitation District charges a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for connections in the Pittsburg area. The charge shown in the Fee Schedule is $4, c. Buy in to existing collection system. Sewer FRC Survey for Single Family Residential The facility reserve charges of other nearby communities was compared to the current and projected charges for the City of Pittsburg. The results of the survey are shown in Figure ES.7. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-7

17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES.7 Sewer FRC Survey for Single Family Residential Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sub-basins DS and SW109 (DDSD) $4,330 $4,975 Martinez (MVSD) $3,127 $4,499 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 All Other Sewer Sub-basins (DDSD) $2,650 $4,975 Antioch (DDSD) $1,723 $4,225 Pittsburg, Current $300 (DDSD) $4,975 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sewer Sub-basins SW (SW Hills) (DDSD) $4,975 Martinez (CCCSD) $4,971 Oakley (ISD) Concord $3,703 $3,231 Collection Treatment Collection & Treatment $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 Legend: CCCSD = Central Contra Costa Sanitary District; DDSD = Delta Diablo Sanitation District; ISD = Ironhouse Sanitary District; MVSD = Mountain View Sanitary District Recommended Update of FRCs The calculation of FRCs is based, in part, upon projections of construction costs and schedules, projections of the timing and extent of development and projected construction funding costs (debt service). It is recommended that the City revisit and update its facility reserve charges in three years or after receiving significant, material information relevant to the calculation of FRCs, whichever occurs sooner. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. ES-8

18 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the development of facility reserve charges (FRCs) to recover portion of the annual costs for the capital improvement program of the City of Pittsburg (City) water and sewer utilities. Project Authorization and Objectives During November 2003, Brown and Caldwell entered into an agreement with the City to prepare a study that documents the development of a facility reserve charges and rates for its water and sewer enterprises. A previous study of water facility reserve charges and rates was performed in The current study provides water and sewer facility reserve charges recommendations for Fiscal Years 2004/05 through FY 2008/09. The facility reserve charge development process in this study is in accordance with standard industry practices. Conceptual Approach In developing facility reserve charges for the City, we have endeavored to satisfy the rational nexus criteria generally applied to these types of charges. A rational nexusbased facility reserve charge must: Be rationally based on public policy that demonstrates a nexus between new development and the need to expand or build facilities to accommodate it. Not exceed the new development s proportional share of the cost of facilities needed to serve that development, after crediting it for other contributions that it has already made or will make toward that cost. Not be arbitrary or discriminatory in its application to individuals or customer classes. A facility reserve charge is a charge to pay for public agencies facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed or to pay for new facilities that will be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged (new development or increases to existing service capacity). The City has performed extensive planning of the new facilities Planning efforts include the preparation of the 2000 Water System Master Plan, Amendment No. 2 (August 2004) and the 2003 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. The FRCs ensures that the growth pays for growth by allocating the cost of new facilities and the cost of unused capacity in existing facilities to new development while allocating the cost of repairing and refurbishing facilities used by current customers to sewer and water rates. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 1-1

19 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Report Organization The report is organized into three chapters and multiple appendices. Following the introduction, Chapter 2 describes the development of water facility reserve charges. Chapter 3 describes the development of sewer facility reserve charges. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 1-2

20 CHAPTER 2 WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES This chapter documents the development and justification in support of the City s Water Facility Reserve Charges (FRCs). The Facility Reserve Charges are intended to recover a portion of the City s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) cost, and utility rate payers prior investment in capital facilities that support land development through utility system expansion. The facility reserve charges that are developed meet the regulatory requirements found in Government Code Section et sequentia regarding the establishment of capacity charges. 1 The development of FRCs also meet the policies stated in the City of Pittsburg s General Plan (GP) adopted October Specifically, GP Policy 3-P-11 states that the City should Review and update the City s development impact fee schedule to ensure that new development pays its proportional share of the costs associated with the provision of facilities for police, parks, water, sewer, storm drainage, and schools. Development of water facility reserve charges is described in detail and supported with tables and figures in the remainder of this chapter. All tables are included at the end of the chapter. Figures are included within the text in the order of reference. Facility Reserve Charge Regulatory Requirements A facility reserve charge is a charge to pay for public agencies facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed or to pay for new facilities that will be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged (new development or increases to existing meter capacity). The terms facility reserve charge and capacity charge are not synonymous with the term connection fee or charge. Section of the State of California Government Code defines a connection fee as a fee for the physical facilities necessary to make a water connection or a sewer connection, including, but not limited to, meters, meter boxes, and pipelines from the structure or project to a water distribution line or sewer main, and that does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of labor and materials for installation of those facilities. Section of the State of California Government Code is included in Appendix A. FRCs are not for the physical connection to a system and do not include costs for operations and maintenance. Current Water Facility Reserve Charges The City has separate FRCs for both its water and sewer utilities. Current water facility reserve charges are shown in Figure 2.1. Water facility reserve charges are based upon the size of the water meter for nonresidential customers. Water facility reserve charges for residential connections are based on the number of individual living units being connected to the system. The City last increased its water facility 1 The terms facility reserve charge, as used by the City, and capacity charge, as defined in the Government Code, are synonymous. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-1

21 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES reserve charges in FY 2000/01. At that time, the water FRC for single family residential connections increased by 23 percent from $534 to $656. The terms facility reserve charge, as used by the City, and capacity charge, as defined in the Government Code, are synonymous. Figure 2.1 Current Water Facility Reserve Charges Facility Equivalency Reserve Nonresidential ($ per meter) Factor * Charge 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $656 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $656 1-inch meter 2.5 $1, /2-inch meter 5.0 $3,280 2-inch meter 8.0 $5,248 3-inch meter 16.0 $10,496 4-inch meter 25.0 $16,400 6-inch meter 50.0 $32,800 8-inch meter 90.0 $59, inch meter $95, inch meter $141,040 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling 5/8-inch or $656 Duplex (per unit) 3/4-inch meters $656 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $470 * An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. Water Facility Reserve Charge Development Methodology Facility reserve charges are based on the premise that new development in the City pay for its proportionate fair share of the water system capacity originally funded by service rates. In addition, the FRCs should include the costs for future system expansion to serve new development customers. The FRCs developed herein meet the rational nexus criteria generally applied to these types of charges. A rational nexus-based FRC should: This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-2

22 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Be rationally based on public policy that demonstrates a nexus between new development and the need to expand or build facilities to accommodate it. Not exceed the new development s proportional share of the cost of facilities needed to serve that development, after crediting it for other contributions that it has already made or will make toward that cost. Not be arbitrary, discriminatory or capricious in its application to individuals or customer classes. The methodology used to develop the City s water facility reserve charges consists of the following steps: Prepare an inventory of system assets and calculate the replacement cost for those assets. Prepare a list of projected capital expenditures for assets that will be built and paid for in the near future that will benefit new development. Determine the capacity of the current system. Determine the amount of new development. Estimate the amount of new debt service. New debt service (principal and interest) will be paid in part by rate payers and partly by new development. Estimate the amount of current debt service principal remaining to be paid. These payments are subtracted from the value of current assets since the principal portion already paid is included in either the system inventory asset values and the principal portion remaining to be paid is included in water rates. Estimate the amount of contributed capital. These contributions are subtracted from the value of the assets since the contribution is already included in the system inventory asset values. Calculate the unit cost of capital facilities. Prepare a schedule of facility reserve charges based upon the unit cost of capital facilities. Details of the development of facility reserve charges are described in the following sections. Replacement Cost of Current Assets Water system assets included in the facility reserve charge calculation are water treatment facilities, wells, mains, hydrants, storage tanks, and pump stations. Service lateral pipe between the customer and water meter was not included in the inventory as it benefits only the customer being served by the lateral. Equipment, such as vehicles, computers, portable generators and miscellaneous tools, were not included in the inventory since these are operational expenses born by rate payers and new development will pay for replacement of these assets in their water rates after connecting to the system and obtaining water service. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-3

23 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES A partial list of water treatment facilities were included in the GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit L, Water Distribution System Network Structures Since 1986, prepared by Harris & Associates and dated December This exhibit is included in Appendix B. The replacement cost of water structures were based on costs from Exhibit L and on costs developed by Brown and Caldwell for water treatment facilities not shown in Exhibit L. The water treatment facilities not shown in Exhibit L were fully depreciated. Brown and Caldwell developed replacement costs for the filter structure and building, flocculation/sedimentation basins, raw water pump station and filtered water pump station. The development of costs by Brown and Caldwell are shown in Appendix C. The replacement cost of water structures were based on costs shown in Appendix B, Appendix C and on costs for the development and replacement of a municipal well included in the City s Water System Capital Improvement Program. The replacement cost of water pipelines was based on a list of water pipeline costs included in GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe. This exhibit is included in Appendix B. The replacement cost of the City s water system (water treatment facilities, water structures and water pipelines) is shown Table 2.1. Note that one asset class, 20-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), shows the amount of 20-inch DIP that exists and benefits development in the Southwest (SW) Hills area only. The segment of pipe that benefits the SW Hills was contributed to the City by three developments for use in transmitting water to any development in that area until that point in time that the segment reaches its transmission capacity. The City plans to construct another 20- inch DIP transmission main parallel to the existing 20-inch transmission main that will enable the City to serve the three developments that contributed the first 20-inch transmission main plus other developments in that area. Projected Capital Improvement Program Expenditures Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projected expenditures for projects that will benefit new development are described in the City s 2000 Water System Master Plan, Amendment No. 2 (adopted October 2004). 3 A list of those projects (along with CIP projects for refurbishment and replacement of current assets) are shown in Table 2.2 (in 2004 dollars). Costs for the same list of projects, in escalated dollars, are shown in Table 2.3. A portion of the projected CIP project expenditures benefit developments in the SW Hills. The projects that benefit the SW Hills area are for the construction of 2 The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) promulgates standards for the compilation and reporting of financial data by government agencies. 3 The 2000 Water System Master Plan, and Amendment No. 2 of the Master Plan, were developed by Carollo Engineers. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-4

24 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES transmission lines, storage tanks and reservoirs. Ten developments were identified by the City in the SW Hills area. The percentage use of each project by each development was determined by the City. A list of the projects, developments and the percentage use of the projects by each development is shown in Table 2.4. The portion of projected CIP expenditures for each development is shown in Table 2.5. New (Future) Debt Service Principal Payments Most of the CIP expenditures for projects that will benefit new development are forecast to be funded by issuance of debt. Water Treatment Plant sludge handling facilities are proposed to be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. The City is considering the issuance of debt obligations of about $24.5 million during the next two years to fund the initial portion of these projects. Projected debt service payments for funded projects are shown in Table 2.6. Current Debt Service Principal Payments The City currently has outstanding Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds. This debt funded part of the Water System Capital Improvements Program (the "Water Program"). Improvements constructed under the Water Program consist primarily of the completion of two reservoirs at the Water Treatment Plant with a total capacity of 6 million gallons, and repair and replacement of water lines within the City. The principal portion remaining of the 1997 debt is shown in Table 2.7 and in Appendix D. Contributed Capital Contributed capital comes in the form of Redevelopment Agency funds and Assessment District funds. To the extent that these funds paid for construction of the current water system and the facilities constructed with the use of these funds is not at the end of its useful life, these funds are deducted from the replacement value of the system. Redevelopment Agency fund and Assessment District fund contributions to the system are listed in Appendix E. Water System Capacity The capacity of the water system is defined in terms of water treatment plant capacity. The State Health Department has permitted the City s water treatment plant at 28 million gallons per day (mgd) of peak day capacity. Based on production records, current peak day production is approximately 16 mgd. The remaining capacity in the water treatment plant is approximately 12 mgd. This remaining unused plant capacity is available to serve new development, provided new development pays its fair share to reimburse rate payers for their prior expenditures to create this plant capacity. Water Facility Reserve Charge Development The pattern of development in the City during the next 20 years, leading to its ultimate built-out condition, will define the expansion of the water system. Those CIP This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-5

25 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES projects that are of benefit to new development were identified. Capacity available in the City s water distribution system and in the City s water treatment plant were also identified. The City also recognized that new development could be categorized by areas according to CIP projects that benefit new development. A matrix showing areas in the water pressure zones with similar benefits from capital facilities and the categories of capital facility projects is shown in Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2 Areas of the City with Similar Benefits from Capital Facilities Projects Capital Facilities Generalized Benefit Area Specific Benefit Water Water SE 20-inch Zone I/II SW Hills Area Distribution Treatment Trans Line Reservoir CIP (a) SW Hills (All Zones) X X Zones I and II; not SW Hills X X X X Zone III; not SW Hills X X X Note: a. The SW Hills CIP includes transmission lines, storage facilities and pump stations that benefit only developments in that area. Figure 2.3, from the Water System Master Plan, Amendment No. 2, shows the existing and proposed water pressure zones. The following sections summarize which facilities are included in the FRC. Water Facilities of Area Specific Benefit Included in the FRC Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area will benefit from a planned, new Zone II and II Pump Station and transmission lines and all structures and pipelines for facilities in Zone IV, Zone V and Zone VI. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from a planned, new 20- inch transmission line and a new Zone I/II Reservoir. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from a planned, new 20-inch transmission line. Water Facilities of Generalized Benefit Included in the FRC Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant. The cost of capacity for the water treatment plant is included in the FRC. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant and capacity in the water distribution system. The cost of capacity for the water treatment plant and the cost of capacity for the water distribution system are included in the FRC. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area will benefit from capacity in the water treatment plant and capacity in the water distribution system. The cost of This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-6

26 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES capacity for the water treatment plant and the cost of capacity for the water distribution system are included in the FRC. The level of development in each area is summarized below. Southwest Hills (SW Hills). This area is projected to add 8,877 dwelling units to the City s water system. Zones I and II; not SW Hills. This area is projected to add 3,052 dwelling units to the City s water system. Zone III; not SW Hills. This area is projected to add 702 dwelling units to the City s water system. A unit cost for construction of the capital facilities for each area of the City was developed and is discussed in the following paragraphs. All units are denominated in dollars for a single family dwelling unit. Water Distribution The water distribution system has capacity available that is of benefit to new development exclusive of the SW Hills. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table 2.8. The development of the unit cost involves projecting the replacement cost of the water distribution system, subtracting capital contributions and remaining principal payments of debt service, and denominating those costs by the amount of water capable of being delivered from the water treatment plant through the system. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is estimated to be $980. Water Treatment The water treatment plant has capacity available that is of benefit to all new development. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table 2.9. The development of the unit cost involves projecting the replacement cost of the water treatment plant, subtracting capital contributions and remaining principal payments of debt service, and denominating those costs by the amount of water capable of being delivered from the water treatment plant. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is estimated to be $790. Southeast 20-inch Transmission Main The 20-inch transmission main to a new reservoir will benefit new development in areas outside the Southwest Hills. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table The development of the unit cost involves projecting the total debt service payments for that capital project and denominating those costs by the number of dwelling units to be connected in those areas. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is estimated to be $2,360. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-7

27 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 2.3 Existing and Proposed Water Pressure Zones This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-8

28 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Zone I/II Reservoir The Zone I/II reservoir will benefit new development in areas within Zones I and II that are not in the Southwest Hills. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table The development of the unit cost involves projecting the total debt service payments for that capital project and denominating those costs by the number of dwelling units to be connected in those areas. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2006/06 is estimated to be $2,990. SW Hills CIP The Southwest Hills CIP will benefit new development in only the Southwest Hills. The CIP projects that benefit the SW Hills area are for the construction of transmission lines, storage tanks and reservoirs. All of the projects in the SW Hills CIP area are projected to be funded by the issuance of debt. Ten development areas were identified by the City in the SW Hills area. The percentage use of each category of project by each development was determined by the City and was used to allocate the debt service costs for these projects. Although the SW Hills CIP is projected to be funded by the issuance of debt, it is likely that some areas will involve facilities contributed by a developer. Unit costs for capital facilities in each of the SW Hills development areas were calculated in two separate ways one presumes all projected are funded by the issuance of debt; the other method presumes all projects are not funded by the issuance of debt. The method showing unit costs based upon no issuance of debt are intended to be applicable to those development areas that build facilities shown in the SW Hills CIP and contribute those facilities to the City. Unit costs using each method are calculated in a series of tables using the same format. Unit costs based on issuance of debt are shown in Tables 2.12a-2.17a; unit costs based upon no issuance of debt are shown in Tables 2.12b-2.17b. Allocation of debt service is shown in Table 2.12a. Allocation of project costs (no debt service) is shown in Table 2.12b. The amount of debt service, summarized by type of project and project phase, is shown in Table 2.13a. The amount of project costs, summarized by type of project and project phase, is shown in Table 2.13b. The amount of debt service costs or project costs allocated to each development for each project phase is used to calculate a facility reserve charge for each project phase for each development. The average facility reserve charge for each project phase is also shown. The FRCs for the first phases are shown in Tables 2.14a and 2.14b. The FRCs for the next phase are shown in Tables 2.15a and 2.15b. The FRCs for the all phases are shown in Tables 2.16a and 2.16b. A summary of the unit costs is shown in Tables 2.17a and 2.17b. The unit costs applicable to each area are totaled to produce a facility reserve charge for each area and are shown in Figure 2.4 (based upon the issuance of debt for SW Hills project funding) and Figure 2.5 (based upon the issuance of no debt for SW Hills project funding). This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-9

29 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 2.4 Unit Costs for Water Capital Facilities, FY 05/06 Based Upon the Issuance of Debt for SW Hills Project Funding Southwest Hills Development Areas Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Zones I and II; not SW Hills Zone III; not SW Hills West Pitts/Bay San Marco San Marco Bailey Water Facility Reserve Charge Alves Oak Hills Coast Point San Marco Hills Meadows Estates Smith Current Facility Reserve Charges $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges Distribution na na na na na na na na na na $980 $980 WTP $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 Zone I/II Reservoir na na na na na na na na na na $2,990 na SE 20-inch Trans Main na na na na na na na na na na $2,360 $2,360 SW Hills CIP, Phase I/II $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 na na SW Hills CIP, Phase III $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 na na Total Water FRC $9,820 $930 $7,800 $9,310 $6,510 $4,920 $6,080 $4,310 $4,130 $6,290 $7,120 $4,130 Figure 2.5 Unit Costs for Water Capital Facilities, FY 05/06 Based Upon No Issuance of Debt for SW Hills Project Funding Southwest Hills Development Areas Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Zones I and II; not SW Hills Zone III; not SW Hills West Pitts/Bay San Marco San Marco Bailey Water Facility Reserve Charge Alves Oak Hills Coast Point San Marco Hills Meadows Estates Smith Current Facility Reserve Charges $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges Distribution na na na na na na na na na na $980 $980 WTP $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 Zone I/II Reservoir na na na na na na na na na na $2,990 na SE 20-inch Trans Main na na na na na na na na na na $2,360 $2,360 SW Hills CIP, Phase I/II $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 na na SW Hills CIP, Phase III $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 na na Total Water FRC $5,270 $860 $4,270 $5,010 $3,620 $2,840 $3,420 $2,530 $2,450 $3,520 $7,120 $4,130 Recommended Facility Reserve Charges The unit cost of capital facilities was used to develop a schedule of facility reserve charges for residential and nonresidential customers. FRCs for nonresidential customers are based on the unit costs with a rate structure for each water meter size. FRCs for residential customers are based on the unit costs with a rate structure for single family units, duplexes, and multiple family units. A complete schedule of charges for each area in the City (including each of the ten development areas identified by the City in the SW Hills) is shown in Table 2.18a (using debt service funding for the SW Hills area) and Table 2-18b (using no debt service funding for the SW Hills area) for a 5-year period. Water Facility Reserve Charges Survey for Single Family Residential The facility reserve charges of other nearby communities was compared to the current and projected charges for the City of Pittsburg. The results of the survey are shown in Table 2.19 and Figure 2.6. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-10

30 CHAPTER 2. WATER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 2.6 Water FRC Survey for Single Family Residential CCWD $10,134 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Alves) $9,820 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Zones I & II; not SW Hills $7,120 $4,460 Martinez $5,300 $4,460 Antioch $4,560 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Smith) $4,130 $4,460 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Zone III; not SW Hills $4,130 $4,460 City or Local Portion Pittsburg, Current $656 $4,460 CCWD Raw Water Portion $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Note: The CCWD Fee for Untreated (Raw) Water Wholesale Municipal Service applies to meters outside the Contra Costa Water District. CCWD fees shown for each City are for a 5/8-inch meter in Service Area A. Recommended Update of FRCs The calculation of FRCs is based, in part, upon projections of construction costs and schedules, projections of the timing and extent of development and projected construction funding costs (debt service). It is recommended that the City revisit and update its facility reserve charges in three years or after receiving significant, material information relevant to the calculation of FRCs, whichever occurs sooner. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 2-11

31 Table 2.1 Water System Replacement Cost (2003 Dollars) Replacement WTP Capacity Water Treatment Plant Description/Location Const. Date Cost % Available (a) $ Available 5MG Finished Water Reservoir Water Treatment Plant 1999 $3,470, % $1,487,263 Generator Water Treatment Plant 1990 $731, % $313,599 Control/Chemical Feed Building Water Treatment Plant 1990 $3,912, % $1,676,751 Bulk Chemical Storage Tanks Water Treatment Plant 1990 $863, % $369,960 Booster Pumps Water Treatment Plant 1990 $949, % $407,031 Fluoride Feed Room Water Treatment Plant 1989 $25, % $10,813 1 MG Tank Water Treatment Plant 1999 $871, % $373,354 Filter Structure and Building Water Treatment Plant 1953/1973 see note b $7,570, % $3,244,286 Flocculation/Sedimentation Basins Water Treatment Plant 1953/1973/1990 see note b $6,680, % $2,862,857 Raw Water Pump Station Water Treatment Plant 1953/1973 see note b $1,470, % $630,000 Filtered Water Pump Station Water Treatment Plant 1953/1973 see note b $2,000, % $857,143 Subtotal Water Treatment Plant $28,543,800 $12,233,057 Notes: a. Percent available is the capacity available in the WTP (12 mgd) divided by the operating capacity (28 mgd). b. The replacement cost for these items was not included in the GASB 34 Compliance Report. Replacement cost values were estimated by Brown and Caldwell. Replacement Structures Description/Location Const. Date Cost 2.5 MG Reservoir Stoneman 1988 $1,122,010 Pump Station Oak Hills Bridgeview 1991 $1,101,860 2 MG Tank Oak Hills Bridgeview 1991 $1,943,730 Well Ball Park - Civic & Railroad 1995 see note c $900,000 Well Rossmoor 1995 see note c $900,000 In-Ground Tank Shadybrook - Shadybrook Ct $2,198,540 Booster Station Shadybrook - Sunpeak Dr 1999 $1,262,150 Steel Tank Highlands Ranch - Ventura Dr 2000 $1,086,510 Booster Station Highlands Ranch - Ventura Dr 2000 $1,086,520 Subtotal Structures $11,601,320 Notes: c. The replacement cost for these items was included in the GASB 34 Compliance Report but are not representative of current replacement costs. Replacement cost values were based on the cost for the "Development and Construction of Replacement Well" project in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report Exhibit K, Water Pipe, and Exhibit L, Water Distribution System Network Structures Since 1986, Harris & Associates, December FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.1 SysStrucCost 5/3/2005

32 Table 2.1 Water System Replacement Cost (2003 Dollars) Systemwide SW Hills Net Replacement Pipelines Lineal Feet Lineal Feet Lineal Feet Unit Cost Cost 4"PVC $122 $34,160 6"PVC 20, ,300 $122 $2,476,600 8"PVC 202, ,466 $122 $24,700,852 10"PVC 9, ,540 $144 $1,373,760 12"PVC 2, ,800 $151 $422,800 16"PVC 7, ,420 $205 $1,521,100 12"DIP 10, ,000 $151 $1,510,000 16"DIP 6, ,300 $205 $1,291,500 20"DIP (d) 54,246 12,000 42,246 $219 $9,251,874 20"DIP 1, ,340 $187 $250,078 2"ACP $122 $119,560 4"ACP $122 $34,160 6"ACP 3, ,777 $122 $460,794 8"ACP 4, ,460 $122 $544,120 10"ACP $144 $141,120 12"ACP 5, ,216 $151 $787,616 14"ACP 13, ,600 $178 $2,420,800 18"ACP $205 $10,250 24"ACP $261 $78,300 30"ACP $416 $104,000 Subtotal Pipelines 344,585 12, ,585 $47,533,444 Notes: d. The systemwide lineal feet shown in the GASB 34 Compliance Report include lines that serve the SW Hills. The lineal feet of pipe serving the SW Hills is calculated below, excluded from this total and used to develop a separate charge. SW Hills Replacement Lineal Feet Unit Cost Cost 12,000 $219 $2,628,000 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report Exhibit K, Water Pipe, and Exhibit L, Water Distribution System Network Pipelines Since 1986, Harris & Associates, December FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.1 SysStrucCost 5/3/2005

33 Table 2.2 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (2004 Dollars) Item Project Description (a) FY05-FY24 Cost FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Water Treatment Plant On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) WTP Capital repairs 2,000, , ,000 WTP security upgrades 280, ,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Subtotal $2,280,000 $100,000 $60,000 $560,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 Development related- city wide (bond financed) WTP Washwater Reclamation Basin(s) 1,500, ,000 1,300,000 WTP Sludge handling facility 1,300, ,000 1,100,000 Subtotal $2,800,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $200,000 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Water Treatment Plant $5,080,000 $100,000 $60,000 $760,000 $1,360,000 $0 $200,000 $1,100,000 $500,000 $0 $0 Water Distribution On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) 20" Main Harbor St (Leland to Garcia) 550, ,000 Water Main/Service Line Replacement Program $1.0 M/year) (1) 18,650, , , , , , , ,000 1,050,000 1,250,000 Convert Backyard Services in Pittsburg Heights to Street 385, ,000 Hillview Reservoir Storm Drain/Erosion Repair 550, ,000 Water System Mapping for GIS 100, ,000 Conversion to radio-read water meter system (limited customers) 100, ,000 Citywide Radio Telemetry 145, ,000 8" Main Connections Columbia St (E 14th & E Santa Fe) 87,834 87,834 8" Main Connection Harbor St. (Small World Park to Presidio) 40,000 40,000 12" Main Reinforcement Stoneman Ave (Harbor to Loveridge) 630, ,000 16" Main Harbor St (Buchanan to Yosemite) 462, ,000 Development and Construction of Replacement Well 900, , ,000 Oakhills Zone III Emergency Power 175, ,000 Seismic upgrades - Pump stations, reservoirs and transmission lines (est) 1,000, , , ,000 Reservoir landscape upgrades 100,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 Subtotal $23,874,834 $1,212,000 $1,900,000 $902,834 $625,000 $1,280,000 $1,380,000 $1,250,000 $675,000 $1,050,000 $1,250,000 On-going Maintenance (bond financed) Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street 600, ,000 Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 736, ,083 20" Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 1,475,000 1,475,000 16" Main Central & 14th 770, ,000 Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) 980, ,000 Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's portion) 1,400,000 1,400,000 Disinfection modification (at WTP) 500, ,000 Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). 1,589,813 1,589,813 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (6% City funded) 238, ,472 Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) 3,974,532 3,974,532 Subtotal $12,263,900 $0 $500,000 $6,570,896 $0 $980,000 $0 $0 $4,213,004 $0 $0 Development related- city wide (bond financed) 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills 3,856, ,000 3,456,091 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills 3,974, ,000 3,574,532 Subtotal $7,830,623 $0 $0 $800,000 $7,030,623 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Development related- SW Hills (bond financed) Zone II Pumping WTP 1,490,449 1,490,449 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills (94% Developer Funded) 3,736,060 3,736,060 Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 4,968,165 4,968, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 4,532,159 4,532, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a 3,815,550 3,815,550 Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant 1,043,315 1,043,315 Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant 794, ,906 Subtotal $20,380,604 $0 $12,034,088 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,346,516 $0 $0 Total Water Distribution $64,349,961 $1,212,000 $14,434,088 $8,273,730 $7,655,623 $2,260,000 $1,380,000 $1,250,000 $13,234,520 $1,050,000 $1,250,000 Total $69,429,961 $1,312,000 $14,494,088 $9,033,730 $9,015,623 $2,260,000 $1,580,000 $2,350,000 $13,734,520 $1,050,000 $1,250,000 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.2 CIP2004$ 5/3/2005

34 Table 2.2 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (2004 Dollars) Item Project Description (a) FY05-FY24 Cost Water Treatment Plant On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) WTP Capital repairs 2,000,000 WTP security upgrades 280,000 Subtotal $2,280,000 Development related- city wide (bond financed) WTP Washwater Reclamation Basin(s) 1,500,000 WTP Sludge handling facility 1,300,000 Subtotal $2,800,000 Total Water Treatment Plant $5,080,000 Water Distribution On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) 20" Main Harbor St (Leland to Garcia) 550,000 Water Main/Service Line Replacement Program $1.0 M/year) (1) 18,650,000 Convert Backyard Services in Pittsburg Heights to Street 385,000 Hillview Reservoir Storm Drain/Erosion Repair 550,000 Water System Mapping for GIS 100,000 Conversion to radio-read water meter system (limited customers) 100,000 Citywide Radio Telemetry 145,000 8" Main Connections Columbia St (E 14th & E Santa Fe) 87,834 8" Main Connection Harbor St. (Small World Park to Presidio) 40,000 12" Main Reinforcement Stoneman Ave (Harbor to Loveridge) 630,000 16" Main Harbor St (Buchanan to Yosemite) 462,000 Development and Construction of Replacement Well 900,000 Oakhills Zone III Emergency Power 175,000 Seismic upgrades - Pump stations, reservoirs and transmission lines (est) 1,000,000 Reservoir landscape upgrades 100,000 Subtotal $23,874,834 On-going Maintenance (bond financed) Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street 600,000 Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 736,083 20" Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 1,475,000 16" Main Central & 14th 770,000 Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) 980,000 Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's portion) 1,400,000 Disinfection modification (at WTP) 500,000 Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). 1,589,813 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (6% City funded) 238,472 Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) 3,974,532 Subtotal $12,263,900 Development related- city wide (bond financed) 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills 3,856,091 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills 3,974,532 Subtotal $7,830,623 Development related- SW Hills (bond financed) Zone II Pumping WTP 1,490,449 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills (94% Developer Funded) 3,736,060 Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 4,968, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 4,532, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a 3,815,550 Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant 1,043,315 Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant 794,906 Subtotal $20,380,604 Total Water Distribution $64,349,961 Total $69,429,961 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY , ,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 1,250, ,000 1,250,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,000,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 $1,250,000 $750,000 $1,250,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $750,000 $1,250,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,000,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,500,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.2 CIP2004$ 5/3/2005

35 Table 2.3 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (Adjusted Dollars) Item Project Description FY05-FY24 Cost (a) FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Water Treatment Plant On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) WTP Capital repairs 2,745, , , WTP security upgrades 302, ,500 64,274 66,202 68, Subtotal $3,047,678 $103,500 $64,274 $617,883 $68,188 $0 $0 $0 $639,549 $0 $0 $0 Development related- city wide (pay as you go) WTP Washwater Reclamation Basin(s) 1,698, ,672 1,477, WTP Sludge handling facility 1,607, ,135 1,366, Subtotal $3,305,236 $0 $0 $220,672 $1,477,401 $0 $241,135 $1,366,028 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Water Treatment Plant $6,352,914 $103,500 $64,274 $838,555 $1,545,589 $0 $241,135 $1,366,028 $639,549 $0 $0 $0 Water Distribution On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) 20" Main Harbor St (Leland to Garcia) 589, , Water Main/Service Line Replacement Program (@ $1.0 M/year) (1) 27,690, , , , , , , ,549 1,383,345 1,696,245 1,747,132 Convert Backyard Services in Pittsburg Heights to Street 450, , Hillview Reservoir Storm Drain/Erosion Repair 569, , Water System Mapping for GIS 113, , Conversion to radio-read water meter system (limited customers) 107, , Citywide Radio Telemetry 169, , " Main Connections Columbia St (E 14th & E Santa Fe) 96, , " Main Connection Harbor St. (Small World Park to Presidio) 44, , " Main Reinforcement Stoneman Ave (Harbor to Loveridge) 759, , " Main Harbor St (Buchanan to Yosemite) 478, , Development and Construction of Replacement Well 956, , , Oakhills Zone III Emergency Power 223, , Seismic upgrades - Pump stations, reservoirs and transmission lines (est) 1,189, , , , Reservoir landscape upgrades 109, ,561 27,584 28, Subtotal $33,548,878 $1,254,420 $2,035,328 $996,153 $710,289 $1,498,312 $1,663,829 $1,552,304 $863,392 $1,383,345 $1,696,245 $1,747,132 On-going Maintenance (bond financed) Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street 662, , Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 812, , " Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 1,627, ,627, " Main Central & 14th 849, , Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) 1,147, ,147, Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's portion) 1,544, ,544, Disinfection modification (at WTP) 535, , Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). 1,754, ,754, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (88% City funded) 305, , Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) 5,083, ,083, Subtotal $14,321,681 $0 $535,613 $7,250,075 $0 $1,147,145 $0 $0 $5,388,848 $0 $0 $0 Development related- city wide (bond financed) 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills 4,369, ,345 3,927, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills 4,503, ,345 4,062, Subtotal $8,872,730 $0 $0 $882,689 $7,990,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Development related- SW Hills (bond financed) Zone II Pumping WTP 1,596, ,596, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills 4,778, ,778, Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 5,322, ,322, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 4,854, ,854, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a 4,880, ,880, Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant 1,117, ,117, Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant 1,016, ,016, Subtotal $23,567,234 $0 $12,891,216 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,676,018 $0 $0 $0 Total Water Distribution $80,310,522 $1,254,420 $15,462,156 $9,128,917 $8,700,329 $2,645,458 $1,663,829 $1,552,304 $16,928,257 $1,383,345 $1,696,245 $1,747,132 Total $86,663,437 $1,357,920 $15,526,429 $9,967,472 $10,245,918 $2,645,458 $1,904,964 $2,918,332 $17,567,806 $1,383,345 $1,696,245 $1,747,132 a. Costs in each year are adjusted based on the cumulative inflation rate. annual > 3.5% 3.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.3 CIPEscalated$ 5/3/2005

36 Table 2.3 Water System Capital Improvement Program Costs (Adjusted Dollars) Item Project Description FY05-FY24 Cost (a) FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Water Treatment Plant On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) WTP Capital repairs 2,745,515 WTP security upgrades 302,163 Subtotal $3,047,678 Development related- city wide (pay as you go) WTP Washwater Reclamation Basin(s) 1,698,074 WTP Sludge handling facility 1,607,162 Subtotal $3,305,236 Total Water Treatment Plant $6,352,914 Water Distribution On-going Maintenance (pay as you go) 20" Main Harbor St (Leland to Garcia) 589,174 Water Main/Service Line Replacement Program $1.0 M/year) (1) 27,690,842 Convert Backyard Services in Pittsburg Heights to Street 450,664 Hillview Reservoir Storm Drain/Erosion Repair 569,250 Water System Mapping for GIS 113,646 Conversion to radio-read water meter system (limited customers) 107,123 Citywide Radio Telemetry 169,731 8" Main Connections Columbia St (E 14th & E Santa Fe) 96,913 8" Main Connection Harbor St. (Small World Park to Presidio) 44,134 12" Main Reinforcement Stoneman Ave (Harbor to Loveridge) 759,574 16" Main Harbor St (Buchanan to Yosemite) 478,170 Development and Construction of Replacement Well 956,858 Oakhills Zone III Emergency Power 223,842 Seismic upgrades - Pump stations, reservoirs and transmission lines (est) 1,189,401 Reservoir landscape upgrades 109,557 Subtotal $33,548,878 On-going Maintenance (bond financed) Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street 662,017 Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 812,166 20" Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 1,627,459 16" Main Central & 14th 849,589 Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) 1,147,145 Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's portion) 1,544,706 Disinfection modification (at WTP) 535,613 Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). 1,754,139 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (88% City funded) 305,029 Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) 5,083,819 Subtotal $14,321,681 Development related- city wide (bond financed) 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills 4,369,063 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills 4,503,667 Subtotal $8,872,730 Development related- SW Hills (bond financed) Zone II Pumping WTP 1,596,606 Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills 4,778,789 Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 5,322, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 4,854, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a 4,880,465 Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant 1,117,625 Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant 1,016,763 Subtotal $23,567,234 Total Water Distribution $80,310,522 Total $86,663,437 a. Costs in each year are adjusted based on the cumulative inflation rate. annual > 719, , $719,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $834,467 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $719,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $834,467 $0 $0 $ ,079,728 1,853,532 2,061,869 2,123,726 2,187,437 1,668,934 2,320,652 2,390,272 2,461, $1,079,728 $1,853,532 $2,061,869 $2,123,726 $2,187,437 $1,668,934 $2,320,652 $2,390,272 $2,461, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,079,728 $1,853,532 $2,061,869 $2,123,726 $2,187,437 $1,668,934 $2,320,652 $2,390,272 $2,461,980 $1,799,546 $1,853,532 $2,061,869 $2,123,726 $2,187,437 $2,503,400 $2,320,652 $2,390,272 $2,461, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.3 CIPEscalated$ 5/3/2005

37 Table 2.4 SW Hills CIP Capacity Allocation Development and Percentage Use of Project (a) Project Name Project Description Project Cost (b) Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Total Transmission Mains Segment 1a 20-inch 12,000 ft $3,815, Segment 1b 20-inch sleeve 200 ft $186, Segment 2 24-inch 1,400 ft $528, Segment 3 20-inch 600 ft $190, Segment 4 20-inch 2,000 ft $635, Segment 5A 20-inch 1,100 ft $349, Segment 5B 20-inch 2,100 ft $667, Segment 5C 20-inch 3,200 ft $1,017, Segment 5D 16-inch 1,600 ft $508, New West Leland 16-inch 1,800 ft $447, Total Transmission Mains $8,347,709 Storage Tanks W. Leland 3.00 MGD $4,968, W. Leland or TBA 2.00 MGD $3,974, Oak Hills Zone III 2.00 MGD existing Total Storage Tanks $8,942,697 Project Storage Capacity, MGD Pump Stations Zone II PS (WTP) 7,500 gpm $1,490, Zone III PS (W. Leland) 4,500 gpm $1,043, Zone IV PS (San Marco) 4,000 gpm $794, Total Pump Stations $3,328,670 Total All Projects $20,619,076 Total Dwelling Units (c) Transmission Mains 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Storage Tanks 3.00 MGD Tank ,763 3, MGD Tank ,175 2,253 Pump Stations 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Notes: a. Development percentages are from Table 7, Water Master Plan Amendment no. 2. b. Project costs are from Table 8, Water Master Plan Amendment no. 2. Costs are in 2004 dollars. c. Dwelling units are from Table 5, Water Master Plan Amendment no. 2. Dwelling units for storage tanks are prorated based on tank storage capacity.

38 Table 2.5 SW Hills CIP Cost Allocation Development and Percentage of Project Cost (2004 dollars) Project Name Construction Phase (a) Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Total Development Portion Total CIP Total City Portion Transmission Mains Segment 1a Phase III Percent of Project Cost 26% 0% 23% 14% 0% 0% 16% 7% 4% 10% 100% Cost per Development $992,043 $0 $877,577 $534,177 $0 $0 $610,488 $267,089 $152,622 $381,555 $3,815,550 $3,815,550 $0 Segments 1b-5D Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 21% 2% 6% 4% 46% 4% 10% 1% 0% 6% 100% Cost per Development $958,570 $84,956 $255,877 $169,800 $2,085,079 $165,301 $468,430 $34,165 $18,013 $291,969 $4,532,159 $4,532,159 $0 Storage Tanks W. Leland Phase I/II/III Project Storage Capacity, MGD Percent of Project Cost (b) 23% 0% 18% 15% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Cost per Development $1,985,279 $0 $1,609,685 $1,287,748 $3,845,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,728,072 $8,942,697 $214,625 Pump Stations Zone II and Zone III Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 12% 0% 8% 5% 44% 7% 10% 5% 1% 8% 100% Cost per Development $296,599 $0 $193,758 $119,236 $1,123,799 $168,421 $265,300 $132,650 $29,809 $204,192 $2,533,764 $2,533,764 $0 Zone IV PS (San Marco) Phase III Percent of Project Cost 2% 0% 0% 0% 41% 15% 26% 0% 0% 16% 100% Cost per Development $15,898 $0 $0 $0 $325,911 $119,236 $206,676 $0 $0 $127,185 $794,906 $794,906 $0 Total All Development Projects $4,248,389 $84,956 $2,936,897 $2,110,961 $7,380,149 $452,957 $1,550,894 $433,904 $200,444 $1,004,901 $20,404,451 $20,619,076 $214,625 Notes: a. Construction phases were assigned by the City b. The percent of project cost is based on use of existing and new storage capacity.

39 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2005/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /22 Water Distribution CIP Replacement and Refurbishment Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street 0 662, Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 0 812, " Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 0 1,627, " Main Central & 14th 0 849, Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) ,147, Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's portion) 0 1,544, Disinfection modification (at WTP) 535, Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). 0 1,754, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (6% City funded) , Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) ,083, Subtotal 535,613 7,250, ,147, ,388, Development related- city wide 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills 0 441,345 3,927, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills 0 441,345 4,062, Subtotal 0 882,689 7,990, Development related- SW Hills Zone II Pumping WTP 1,490,449 1,596, Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills (94% Developer Funded) 3,736, ,778, Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 4,968,165 5,322, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 4,532,159 4,854, inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a 3,815, ,880, Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant 1,043,315 1,117, Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant 794, ,016, Subtotal 20,380,604 12,891, ,676, Summary of Debt Issuance Approach Total CIP Amount Total Debt Funded Debt Issued Service 2005/06 Water Debt Expansion CIP Transmission Seg. 1b-5D $4,854,962 $5,447,267 $9,811,169 Storage Tanks $5,322,023 $5,971,309 $10,755,030 Pump Stations $2,714,231 $3,045,368 $5,485,065 Total Expansion CIP $12,891,216 $14,463,944 $26,051, /07 Water Debt Rehabilitation & Replacement CIP Water Distribution R&R $8,932,833 $10,022,639 $18,051,951 Expansion CIP SE 20-inch Trans Main $4,369,063 $4,902,089 $8,829,238 Water Distribution Zone II Reservoir $4,503,667 $5,053,114 $9,101,253 Total Expansion CIP $8,872,730 $9,955,203 $17,930, /12 Water Debt Rehabilitation & Replacement CIP Water Distribution R&R $5,388,848 $6,046,287 $10,890,074 Expansion CIP SW 20-inch Trans Main $4,880,465 $5,475,882 $9,862,707 Storage Tanks $4,778,789 $5,361,802 $9,657,236 Pump Stations $1,016,763 $1,140,808 $2,054,730 Total Expansion CIP $10,676,018 $11,978,492 $21,574,672 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

40 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2005/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /06 Water Debt Transmission Seg. 1b-5D Capital Funding Req't $4,854,962 Issuance Costs $58,260 Note a Underwriters Discount $48,550 Note b Reserve fund $485,496 Note c Amount Financed $5,447,267 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 174, , , , , , , , , , , ,873 93,466 83,438 72,747 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 70,461 75,115 80,077 85,367 91,006 97, , , , , , , , , ,532 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 177, , , , , , , , , , , ,355 98,245 88,532 78,178 67,140 Principal 68,243 72,751 77,557 82,680 88,141 93, , , , , , , , , , ,139 Annual Principal and Interest $245,279 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490, /06 Water Debt Storage Tanks Capital Funding Req't $5,322,023 Issuance Costs $63,864 Note a Underwriters Discount $53,220 Note b Reserve fund $532,202 Note c Amount Financed $5,971,309 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 191, , , , , , , , , , , , ,458 91,465 79,746 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 77,239 82,342 87,781 93,579 99, , , , , , , , , , ,130 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 194, , , , , , , , , , , , ,696 97,049 85,699 73,599 Principal 74,808 79,750 85,018 90,634 96, , , , , , , , , , , ,277 Annual Principal and Interest $268,876 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537, /06 Water Debt Pump Stations Capital Funding Req't $2,714,231 Issuance Costs $32,571 Note a Underwriters Discount $27,142 Note b Reserve fund $271,423 Note c Amount Financed $3,045,368 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 97,734 95,132 92,358 89,401 86,249 82,888 79,305 75,486 71,414 67,073 62,446 57,512 52,253 46,647 40,670 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 39,392 41,994 44,768 47,725 50,878 54,239 57,822 61,641 65,713 70,054 74,681 79,614 84,873 90,480 96,456 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 98,974 96,454 93,768 90,903 87,850 84,595 81,125 77,426 73,482 69,278 64,796 60,018 54,925 49,495 43,706 37,535 Principal 38,152 40,672 43,359 46,223 49,277 52,532 56,002 59,701 63,644 67,849 72,330 77,108 82,202 87,632 93,420 99,591 Annual Principal and Interest $137,127 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274, /07 Water Debt Water Distribution R&R Capital Funding Req't $8,932,833 Issuance Costs $107,194 Note a Underwriters Discount $89,328 Note b Reserve fund $893,283 Note c Amount Financed $10,022,639 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 321, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,520 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 129, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,779 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 325, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,842 Principal 125, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,456 Annual Principal and Interest $451,299 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

41 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2005/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /07 Water Debt SE 20-inch Trans Main Capital Funding Req't $4,369,063 Issuance Costs $52,429 Note a Underwriters Discount $43,691 Note b Reserve fund $436,906 Note c Amount Financed $4,902,089 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 157, , , , , , , , , , ,518 92,577 84,112 75,087 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 63,409 67,598 72,063 76,823 81,898 87,307 93,075 99, , , , , , ,644 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 159, , , , , , , , , , ,302 96,611 88,412 79,671 70,354 Principal 61,413 65,470 69,794 74,405 79,320 84,559 90,145 96, , , , , , , ,377 Annual Principal and Interest $220,731 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441, /07 Water Debt Water Distribution Zone II Reservoir Capital Funding Req't $4,503,667 Issuance Costs $54,044 Note a Underwriters Discount $45,037 Note b Reserve fund $450,367 Note c Amount Financed $5,053,114 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 162, , , , , , , , , , ,615 95,429 86,703 77,400 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 65,363 69,680 74,283 79,190 84,421 89,997 95, , , , , , , ,131 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 164, , , , , , , , , , ,515 99,587 91,136 82,126 72,521 Principal 63,305 67,487 71,945 76,697 81,763 87,164 92,922 99, , , , , , , ,010 Annual Principal and Interest $227,531 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455, /12 Water Debt Water Distribution R&R Capital Funding Req't $5,388,848 Issuance Costs $64,666 Note a Underwriters Discount $53,888 Note b Reserve fund $538,885 Note c Amount Financed $6,046,287 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 194, , , , , , , , ,785 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 78,209 83,376 88,883 94, , , , , ,467 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 196, , , , , , , , , ,545 Principal 75,748 80,751 86,085 91,772 97, , , , , ,707 Annual Principal and Interest $272,252 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544, /12 Water Debt SW 20-inch Trans Main Capital Funding Req't $4,880,465 Issuance Costs $58,566 Note a Underwriters Discount $48,805 Note b Reserve fund $488,046 Note c Amount Financed $5,475,882 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 175, , , , , , , , ,409 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 70,831 75,510 80,498 85,815 91,484 97, , , ,158 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 177, , , , , , , , , ,569 Principal 68,602 73,133 77,964 83,114 88,604 94, , , , ,999 Annual Principal and Interest $246,568 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493, /12 Water Debt Storage Tanks Capital Funding Req't $4,778,789 Issuance Costs $57,345 Note a Underwriters Discount $47,788 Note b Reserve fund $477,879 Note c Amount Financed $5,361,802 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 172, , , , , , , , ,734 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 69,355 73,937 78,821 84,027 89,578 95, , , ,697 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 174, , , , , , , , , ,974 Principal 67,172 71,609 76,340 81,382 86,758 92,489 98, , , ,457 Annual Principal and Interest $241,431 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

42 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2005/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /12 Water Debt Pump Stations Capital Funding Req't $1,016,763 Issuance Costs $12,201 Note a Underwriters Discount $10,168 Note b Reserve fund $101,676 Note c Amount Financed $1,140,808 Term, years 20 Payment No Payments per Year 2 Interest 36,612 35,637 34,598 33,490 32,309 31,050 29,708 28,277 26,752 Total No. of Payments 40 Principal 14,756 15,731 16,770 17,878 19,059 20,318 21,660 23,091 24,616 Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest 37,076 36,132 35,126 34,053 32,909 31,690 30,390 29,004 27,527 25,952 Principal 14,292 15,236 16,242 17,315 18,459 19,679 20,978 22,364 23,841 25,416 Annual Principal and Interest $51,368 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 Notes: a. Issuance costs = 1.20% % of capital b. Underwriters costs = 1.00% % of capital c. Reserve costs = 10.00% % of capital Total New Debt Service Annual Interest 0 470,078 1,571,577 2,171,072 2,109,599 2,044,065 1,974,203 2,485,531 2,969,684 2,853,739 2,730,136 2,598,368 2,457,896 2,308,144 2,148,501 1,978,312 1,796,882 Principal 0 181, , , ,087 1,057,620 1,127,482 1,427,773 1,755,239 1,871,183 1,994,787 2,126,555 2,267,027 2,416,778 2,576,421 2,746,610 2,928,041 Total $0 $651,282 $2,202,124 $3,101,685 $3,101,685 $3,101,685 $3,101,685 $3,913,304 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 Cumulative Interest $0 $470,078 $2,041,656 $4,212,727 $6,322,326 $8,366,391 $10,340,594 $12,826,125 $15,795,809 $18,649,549 $21,379,685 $23,978,053 $26,435,949 $28,744,093 $30,892,594 $32,870,907 $34,667,788 Principal $0 $181,203 $811,750 $1,742,364 $2,734,450 $3,792,070 $4,919,553 $6,347,326 $8,102,565 $9,973,748 $11,968,534 $14,095,089 $16,362,116 $18,778,894 $21,355,315 $24,101,926 $27,029,967 Total $0 $651,282 $2,853,406 $5,955,091 $9,056,777 $12,158,462 $15,260,147 $19,173,451 $23,898,374 $28,623,296 $33,348,219 $38,073,142 $42,798,064 $47,522,987 $52,247,910 $56,972,832 $61,697,755 R&R New Debt Service Annual Interest , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,693 Principal , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,408 Total $0 $0 $451,299 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $1,174,849 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 Cumulative Interest $0 $0 $325,736 $964,832 $1,586,523 $2,189,658 $2,773,011 $3,531,781 $4,457,109 $5,347,970 $6,202,088 $7,017,036 $7,790,227 $8,518,901 $9,200,119 $9,830,745 $10,407,438 Principal $0 $0 $125,563 $389,064 $669,971 $969,434 $1,288,678 $1,704,757 $2,226,531 $2,782,771 $3,375,754 $4,007,907 $4,681,818 $5,400,245 $6,166,129 $6,982,604 $7,853,012 Total $0 $0 $451,299 $1,353,896 $2,256,494 $3,159,091 $4,061,689 $5,236,538 $6,683,640 $8,130,741 $9,577,842 $11,024,943 $12,472,045 $13,919,146 $15,366,247 $16,813,349 $18,260,450 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

43 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2022/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /39 Water Distribution CIP Replacement and Refurbishment Convert Backyard Services in Central Addition to Street Western Loop (16" Loftus, Schooner to Viking & 8" Hanlon) 20" Zone I Main (WTP to Crestview Dr to Railroad via EBMUD R/W) 16" Main Central & 14th Zone I/II Boundary Adjustments (Harbor, Leland, Railroad) Replacement of 0.6 MG W. Leland Reservoir with 3.0 MG (City's porti Disinfection modification (at WTP) Buchanan subarea loop (Suzanne & Kingsley). Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills (6% City funded) Zone I Reservoir (2.0 MG) Subtotal Development related- city wide 20-inch Transmission main to SE Hills Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SE Hills Subtotal Development related- SW Hills Zone II Pumping WTP Zone II Reservoir (2.0 MG) at SW Hills (94% Developer Funded) Zone II Reservoir (3.0 MG) at SW Hills 20-inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segments 1b-5d 20-inch Transmission main to SW Hills, segment 1a Zone III W. Leland Pumping Plant Zone IV SW Hills Pumping Plant Subtotal Summary of Debt Issuance Approach FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

44 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2022/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /06 Water Debt Transmission Seg. 1b-5D Capital Funding Req't $4,854,962 Issuance Costs $58,260 Note a Underwriters Discount $48,550 Note b Reserve fund $485,496 Note c Amount Financed $5,447,267 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2005/06 Water Debt Storage Tanks Capital Funding Req't $5,322,023 Issuance Costs $63,864 Note a Underwriters Discount $53,220 Note b Reserve fund $532,202 Note c Amount Financed $5,971,309 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2005/06 Water Debt Pump Stations Capital Funding Req't $2,714,231 Issuance Costs $32,571 Note a Underwriters Discount $27,142 Note b Reserve fund $271,423 Note c Amount Financed $3,045,368 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2006/07 Water Debt Water Distribution R&R Capital Funding Req't $8,932,833 Issuance Costs $107,194 Note a Underwriters Discount $89,328 Note b Reserve fund $893,283 Note c Amount Financed $10,022,639 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest Totals 61,350 49,201 36,248 22,441 7, Interest 183, , , , , ,363, ,373 42,828 29,455 15, Principal 189, , , , ,447,267 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $490,558 $245,279 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,811, Totals 67,252 53,934 39,736 24,599 8, Interest 201, , , , , ,783, ,700 46,948 32,288 16, Principal 208, , , , ,971,309 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $537,752 $268,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,755, Totals 34,299 27,506 20,265 12,546 4, Interest 102, , , , , ,439, ,957 23,944 16,467 8, Principal 106, , , , ,045,368 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $274,253 $137,127 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,485, Totals 133, ,881 90,526 66,695 41,289 14, Interest 317, , , , , , ,029, , ,882 78,801 54,195 27, Principal 327, , , , , ,022,639 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $902,598 $451,299 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,051,951 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

45 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2022/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /07 Water Debt SE 20-inch Trans Main Capital Funding Req't $4,369,063 Issuance Costs $52,429 Note a Underwriters Discount $43,691 Note b Reserve fund $436,906 Note c Amount Financed $4,902,089 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2006/07 Water Debt Water Distribution Zone II Reservoir Capital Funding Req't $4,503,667 Issuance Costs $54,044 Note a Underwriters Discount $45,037 Note b Reserve fund $450,367 Note c Amount Financed $5,053,114 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2011/12 Water Debt Water Distribution R&R Capital Funding Req't $5,388,848 Issuance Costs $64,666 Note a Underwriters Discount $53,888 Note b Reserve fund $538,885 Note c Amount Financed $6,046,287 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest Totals 65,466 55,210 44,276 32,620 20,195 6, Interest 155, , , , , , ,927, ,420 49,831 38,542 26,507 13, Principal 160, , , , , ,902,089 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $441,462 $220,731 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,829, Totals 67,483 56,911 45,641 33,625 20,817 7, Interest 160, , , , , , ,048, ,282 51,366 39,729 27,324 14, Principal 165, , , , , ,053,114 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $455,063 $227,531 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,101, Totals 133, , , ,744 92,613 80,747 68,097 54,611 40,234 24,908 8, Interest 139, , , , , , , , , , , ,843, , , ,048 98,268 86,775 74,523 61,462 47,538 32,694 16, Principal 143, , , , , , , , , , ,046,287 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $272,252 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,890, /12 Water Debt SW 20-inch Trans Main Capital Funding Req't $4,880,465 Issuance Costs $58,566 Note a Underwriters Discount $48,805 Note b Reserve fund $488,046 Note c Amount Financed $5,475,882 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest 2011/12 Water Debt Storage Tanks Capital Funding Req't $4,778,789 Issuance Costs $57,345 Note a Underwriters Discount $47,788 Note b Reserve fund $477,879 Note c Amount Financed $5,361,802 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest Totals 120, , ,413 93,957 83,876 73,129 61,672 49,459 36,439 22,558 7, Interest 125, , , , , , , , , , , ,386, , ,919 98,761 88,997 78,589 67,492 55,663 43,053 29,610 15, Principal 130, , , , , , , , , , ,475,882 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $493,135 $246,568 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,862, Totals 118, , ,259 91,999 82,129 71,606 60,388 48,429 35,680 22,088 7, Interest 123, , , , , , , , , , , ,295, , ,671 96,703 87,143 76,951 66,086 54,504 42,156 28,993 14, Principal 127, , , , , , , , , , ,361,802 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $482,862 $241,431 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,657,236 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

46 Table 2.6 New Debt Service for Water CIP Projects 2022/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /12 Water Debt Pump Stations Capital Funding Req't $1,016,763 Issuance Costs $12,201 Note a Underwriters Discount $10,168 Note b Reserve fund $101,676 Note c Amount Financed $1,140,808 Term, years 20 Payment No. Payments per Year 2 Interest Total No. of Payments 40 Principal Interest Rate (Annual) 6.50% Payment No. Interest Rate/Pay Period 3.25% Interest Principal Annual Principal and Interest Totals 25,126 23,392 21,544 19,574 17,474 15,235 12,848 10,304 7,591 4,700 1, Interest 26,242 27,976 29,824 31,794 33,894 36,133 38,520 41,064 43,777 46,669 49, , ,273 22,483 20,575 18,541 16,373 14,061 11,597 8,969 6,169 3, Principal 27,095 28,885 30,793 32,827 34,996 37,307 39,772 42,399 45,200 48, ,140,808 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $102,736 $51,368 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,730 Notes: a. Issuance costs = 1.20% % of capital b. Underwriters costs = 1.00% % of capital c. Reserve costs = 10.00% % of capital Total New Debt Service R&R New Debt Service Annual Cumulative Annual Cumulative Interest Principal Total Interest $36,271,255 $37,668,529 $38,845,992 $39,789,123 $40,482,442 $40,973,637 $41,359,868 $41,664,387 $41,881,796 $42,006,341 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 $42,031,888 Principal $30,151,423 $33,479,071 $37,026,531 $40,808,323 $44,188,644 $46,220,247 $47,457,254 $48,775,973 $50,181,801 $51,680,493 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 $52,466,564 Total $66,422,678 $71,147,600 $75,872,523 $80,597,445 $84,671,086 $87,193,885 $88,817,122 $90,440,359 $92,063,597 $93,686,834 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 $94,498,453 Interest Principal Total Totals 1,603,466 1,397,275 1,177, , , , , , , ,545 25, ,031,888 3,121,456 3,327,648 3,547,460 3,781,792 3,380,321 2,031,603 1,237,007 1,318,719 1,405,828 1,498, , ,466,564 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,724,923 $4,073,641 $2,522,798 $1,623,237 $1,623,237 $1,623,237 $1,623,237 $811,619 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,498,453 Totals 519, , , , , , , ,149 72,928 41,778 8, ,873, , ,198 1,054,541 1,124,200 1,198, , , , , , , ,068,926 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $1,447,101 $995,802 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $544,504 $272,252 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,942,025 Interest $10,926,635 $11,384,538 $11,777,099 $12,100,000 $12,348,641 $12,518,116 $12,647,675 $12,749,824 $12,822,752 $12,864,530 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 $12,873,099 Principal $8,780,916 $9,770,114 $10,824,655 $11,948,855 $13,147,315 $13,973,642 $14,388,588 $14,830,943 $15,302,518 $15,805,244 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 $16,068,926 Total $19,707,551 $21,154,652 $22,601,754 $24,048,855 $25,495,956 $26,491,759 $27,036,262 $27,580,766 $28,125,270 $28,669,773 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 $28,942,025 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.6 NewDebtWater 5/3/2005

47 Table 2.7 Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds Item FY97-FY01 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Principal Portion of Debt Service Annual 0 285, , , , , , , , , , , , ,000 Cumulative 0 285, , ,000 1,225,000 1,570,000 1,930,000 2,305,000 2,700,000 3,115,000 3,550,000 4,010,000 4,490,000 4,995,000 Remaining 14,655,000 14,370,000 14,070,000 13,760,000 13,430,000 13,085,000 12,725,000 12,350,000 11,955,000 11,540,000 11,105,000 10,645,000 10,165,000 9,660,000 Water Treatment Plant Portion (a) Percent of Total 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% Principal Portion Remaining 4,469,872 4,382,945 4,291,443 4,196,891 4,096,238 3,991,011 3,881,209 3,766,831 3,646,354 3,519,776 3,387,098 3,246,795 3,100,392 2,946,364 Note a: Source: Cover Page and Page 22 of the June 24, 1997 Official Statement for the Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds. The Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds funded a part of the Water System Capital Improvements Program (the "Water Program"). Improvements to be constructed under the Water Program consist primarily of the completion of a 6 million gallon reservoir and the construction, repair or replacement of water lines within the City. Improvement Cost* % of Total Debt Funded WTP 6M Gallon Water Storage Reservoir 4,630,000 31% yes yes 1988 Water System Improvement 8,200,000 54% yes no 1M Gallon Highland Water Reservoir 2,350,000 15% yes no 15,180, % * The cost of each improvement was provided by the City in an dated July 26, FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl Debt 5/3/2005

48 Table 2.7 Series 1997 Water Revenue Bonds Item Principal Portion of Debt Service Annual Cumulative Remaining Water Treatment Plant Portion (a) Percent of Total Principal Portion Remaining FY05-FY27 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Total 530, , , , , , , , , , , ,000 1,005,000 14,655,000 5,525,000 6,085,000 6,675,000 7,295,000 7,950,000 8,640,000 9,365,000 10,135,000 10,945,000 11,800,000 12,700,000 13,650,000 14,655,000 9,130,000 8,570,000 7,980,000 7,360,000 6,705,000 6,015,000 5,290,000 4,520,000 3,710,000 2,855,000 1,955,000 1,005, % 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 2,784,710 2,613,906 2,433,953 2,244,848 2,045,069 1,834,615 1,613,485 1,378,630 1,131, , , ,532 0 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl Debt 5/3/2005

49 Table 2.8 Water Distribution Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Water Distribution Replacement Cost Pipelines a., b. 47,533,444 49,197,115 50,919,014 52,446,584 54,019,981 55,640,581 57,309,798 59,029,092 60,799,965 62,623,964 Structures b. 11,601,320 12,007,366 12,427,624 12,800,453 13,184,466 13,580,000 13,987,400 14,407,022 14,839,233 15,284,410 Water Distribution Total 59,134,764 61,204,481 63,346,638 65,247,037 67,204,448 69,220,581 71,297,199 73,436,115 75,639,198 77,908,374 Total Water System Structures 59,134,764 61,204,481 63,346,638 65,247,037 67,204,448 69,220,581 71,297,199 73,436,115 75,639,198 77,908,374 Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Redevelopment Agency Funds c. 42,000 41,000 40,000 39,000 38,000 37,000 36,000 35,000 34,000 33,000 Assessment District Funds d. 21,622,730 22,379,526 23,162,809 23,857,693 24,573,424 25,310,627 26,069,946 26,852,044 27,657,605 28,487, Water Revenue Bond Remaining Principal 9,563,109 9,333,762 9,093,989 8,843,791 8,583,169 8,308,646 8,020,224 7,717,902 7,398,205 7,064,608 Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt 31,227,839 31,754,287 32,296,798 32,740,484 33,194,593 33,656,273 34,126,170 34,604,946 35,089,810 35,584,941 Water Distribution System Valuation 27,906,925 29,450,194 31,049,840 32,506,552 34,009,855 35,564,308 37,171,029 38,831,169 40,549,388 42,323,433 WTP Capacity (Max day) Design Capacity (State Health Department) 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 Peak Day Unit Cost ($ per gallon) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Peak Day Single Family Use Average Daily Single Family Dwelling Use (gpd) Peak Factor Peak Day Single Family Use (gpd) Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $920 $970 $1,016 $1,063 $1,111 $1,162 $1,213 $1,267 $1,323 Recommended $920 $970 $1,016 $1,063 $1,111 $1,162 $1,213 $1,267 $1,323 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (e) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $930 $980 $1,020 $1,070 $1,120 $1,170 $1,220 $1,270 $1,330 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $930 $980 $1,020 $1,070 $1,120 $1,170 $1,220 $1,270 $1,330 1-inch meter 2.5 $2,310 $2,430 $2,540 $2,660 $2,780 $2,910 $3,040 $3,170 $3, /2-inch meter 5.0 $4,610 $4,860 $5,080 $5,320 $5,560 $5,810 $6,070 $6,340 $6,620 2-inch meter 8.0 $7,370 $7,770 $8,130 $8,510 $8,900 $9,300 $9,710 $10,140 $10,590 3-inch meter 16.0 $14,730 $15,530 $16,260 $17,010 $17,790 $18,590 $19,420 $20,280 $21,170 4-inch meter 25.0 $23,010 $24,260 $25,400 $26,580 $27,790 $29,040 $30,340 $31,680 $33,070 6-inch meter 50.0 $46,020 $48,520 $50,800 $53,150 $55,570 $58,080 $60,680 $63,360 $66,140 8-inch meter 90.0 $82,830 $87,330 $91,430 $95,660 $100,030 $104,550 $109,220 $114,050 $119, inch meter $133,450 $140,700 $147,300 $154,110 $161,160 $168,440 $175,960 $183,740 $191, inch meter $197,870 $208,620 $218,410 $228,510 $238,950 $249,750 $260,900 $272,450 $284,370 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $930 $980 $1,020 $1,070 $1,120 $1,170 $1,220 $1,270 $1,330 Duplex (per unit) $930 $980 $1,020 $1,070 $1,120 $1,170 $1,220 $1,270 $1,330 Multiple Family (per unit) Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit (roundup to next $1) $530 $560 $590 $610 $640 $670 $700 $730 $760 Notes: a. Does not include meters and services. b. Additions are in escalated dollars. annual > 3.5% 3.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% c. Outstanding principal for the Fund is based on values from p of the 1997 Water FRC Study. d. Assessment District funds are itemized in Appendix E. e. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.8 DistFRC 5/3/2005

50 Table 2.8 Water Distribution Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes Water Distribution Replacement Cost Pipelines a., b. Structures b. Water Distribution Total Total Water System Structures Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Redevelopment Agency Funds c. Assessment District Funds d Water Revenue Bond Remaining Principal Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt Water Distribution System Valuation WTP Capacity (Max day) Design Capacity (State Health Department) Peak Day Unit Cost ($ per gallon) Peak Day Single Family Use Average Daily Single Family Dwelling Use (gpd) Peak Factor Peak Day Single Family Use (gpd) Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated Recommended Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (e) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 3/4-inch meter inch meter /2-inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family Duplex (per unit) Multiple Family (per unit) Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit (roundup to next $1) Notes: a. Does not include meters and services. b. Additions are in escalated dollars. annual > c. Outstanding principal for the Fund is based on values from p of the 1997 Water FRC Study. d. Assessment District funds are itemized in Appendix E. e. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity o a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flo rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter i equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY ,502,683 66,437,763 68,430,896 70,483,823 72,598,338 74,776,288 77,019,577 79,330,164 81,710,069 84,161,371 15,742,942 16,215,231 16,701,687 17,202,738 17,718,820 18,250,385 18,797,896 19,361,833 19,942,688 20,540,969 80,245,625 82,652,994 85,132,584 87,686,561 90,317,158 93,026,673 95,817,473 98,691, ,652, ,702,340 80,245,625 82,652,994 85,132,584 87,686,561 90,317,158 93,026,673 95,817,473 98,691, ,652, ,702,340 32,000 31,000 30,000 29,000 28,000 27,000 26,000 25,000 24,000 23,000 29,341,953 30,222,212 31,128,878 32,062,745 33,024,627 34,015,366 35,035,827 36,086,902 37,169,509 38,284,594 6,713,636 6,345,290 5,956,094 5,546,047 5,115,152 4,659,931 4,180,385 3,676,515 3,141,370 2,578,426 36,087,590 36,598,502 37,114,972 37,637,792 38,167,779 38,702,297 39,242,212 39,788,417 40,334,879 40,886,019 44,158,035 46,054,492 48,017,612 50,048,769 52,149,380 54,324,376 56,575,261 58,903,581 61,317,878 63,816,320 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1,380 $1,439 $1,501 $1,564 $1,630 $1,698 $1,768 $1,841 $1,916 $1,994 $1,380 $1,439 $1,501 $1,564 $1,630 $1,698 $1,768 $1,841 $1,916 $1,994 $1,380 $1,440 $1,510 $1,570 $1,630 $1,700 $1,770 $1,850 $1,920 $2,000 $1,380 $1,440 $1,510 $1,570 $1,630 $1,700 $1,770 $1,850 $1,920 $2,000 $3,450 $3,600 $3,760 $3,920 $4,080 $4,250 $4,420 $4,610 $4,800 $4,990 $6,900 $7,200 $7,510 $7,830 $8,150 $8,490 $8,840 $9,210 $9,590 $9,980 $11,040 $11,520 $12,010 $12,520 $13,040 $13,590 $14,150 $14,730 $15,330 $15,960 $22,080 $23,030 $24,010 $25,030 $26,080 $27,170 $28,290 $29,460 $30,660 $31,910 $34,500 $35,990 $37,520 $39,110 $40,750 $42,450 $44,200 $46,020 $47,910 $49,860 $69,000 $71,970 $75,030 $78,210 $81,490 $84,890 $88,400 $92,040 $95,810 $99,720 $124,200 $129,530 $135,050 $140,770 $146,680 $152,790 $159,120 $165,670 $172,460 $179,490 $200,100 $208,690 $217,580 $226,790 $236,310 $246,160 $256,360 $266,910 $277,850 $289,170 $296,690 $309,430 $322,620 $336,270 $350,380 $365,000 $380,120 $395,760 $411,980 $428,770 $1,380 $1,440 $1,510 $1,570 $1,630 $1,700 $1,770 $1,850 $1,920 $2,000 $1,380 $1,440 $1,510 $1,570 $1,630 $1,700 $1,770 $1,850 $1,920 $2, $790 $830 $860 $900 $940 $980 $1,020 $1,060 $1,100 $1, % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.8 DistFRC 5/3/2005

51 Table 2.9 Water Treatment Plant Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Water Treatment Plant Replacement Cost Water Treatment Plant (Available Capacity) a. 12,233,057 12,661,214 31,494,137 34,353,938 35,556,326 36,800,797 38,088,825 41,085,347 42,523,334 44,011,651 Additions Sludge Handling Basins 1,698,074 1,607,162 Total Water Treatment Plant 12,233,057 12,661,214 33,192,211 34,353,938 35,556,326 36,800,797 39,695,988 41,085,347 42,523,334 44,011,651 Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Redevelopment Agency Funds b. 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216, Water Revenue Bond Remaining Principal 1,798,667 1,755,531 1,710,433 1,663,375 1,614,356 1,562,723 1,508,475 1,451,613 1,391,484 1,328,739 Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt 8,015,123 7,971,987 7,926,889 7,879,831 7,830,812 7,779,179 7,724,931 7,668,069 7,607,940 7,545,195 Water Treatment Plant Valuation 4,217,934 4,689,227 25,265,322 26,474,107 27,725,514 29,021,619 31,971,056 33,417,278 34,915,395 36,466,456 WTP Capacity (Max day) Design Capacity (State Health Department) 12,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 Peak Day Unit Cost ($ per gallon) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Peak Day Single Family Use Average Daily Single Family Dwelling Use (gpd) Peak Factor Peak Day Single Family Use (gpd) Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $342 $790 $827 $866 $907 $999 $1,044 $1,091 $1,140 Recommended $342 $790 $827 $866 $907 $999 $1,044 $1,091 $1,140 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $350 $790 $830 $870 $910 $1,000 $1,050 $1,100 $1,140 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $350 $790 $830 $870 $910 $1,000 $1,050 $1,100 $1,140 1-inch meter 2.5 $860 $1,980 $2,070 $2,170 $2,270 $2,500 $2,620 $2,730 $2, /2-inch meter 5.0 $1,710 $3,950 $4,140 $4,340 $4,540 $5,000 $5,230 $5,460 $5,700 2-inch meter 8.0 $2,740 $6,320 $6,620 $6,940 $7,260 $8,000 $8,360 $8,730 $9,120 3-inch meter 16.0 $5,480 $12,640 $13,240 $13,870 $14,520 $15,990 $16,710 $17,460 $18,240 4-inch meter 25.0 $8,550 $19,740 $20,690 $21,670 $22,680 $24,980 $26,110 $27,280 $28,490 6-inch meter 50.0 $17,100 $39,480 $41,370 $43,330 $45,350 $49,960 $52,220 $54,560 $56,980 8-inch meter 90.0 $30,780 $71,060 $74,460 $77,980 $81,630 $89,920 $93,990 $98,200 $102, inch meter $49,580 $114,490 $119,970 $125,640 $131,510 $144,870 $151,430 $158,220 $165, inch meter $73,520 $169,760 $177,880 $186,290 $194,990 $214,810 $224,530 $234,590 $245,010 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $350 $790 $830 $870 $910 $1,000 $1,050 $1,100 $1,140 Duplex (per unit) $350 $790 $830 $870 $910 $1,000 $1,050 $1,100 $1,140 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $200 $460 $480 $500 $520 $580 $600 $630 $660 a. Available capacity is in escalated dollars. annual > 3.5% 3.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% b. RDA funds are prorated for available capacity. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.9 WTPFRC 5/3/2005

52 Table 2.9 Water Treatment Plant Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes Water Treatment Plant Replacement Cost Water Treatment Plant (Available Capacity) a. Additions Sludge Handling Basins Total Water Treatment Plant Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Redevelopment Agency Funds b Water Revenue Bond Remaining Principal Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt Water Treatment Plant Valuation WTP Capacity (Max day) Design Capacity (State Health Department) Peak Day Unit Cost ($ per gallon) Peak Day Single Family Use Average Daily Single Family Dwelling Use (gpd) Peak Factor Peak Day Single Family Use (gpd) Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated Recommended Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 3/4-inch meter inch meter /2-inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter inch meter Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family Duplex (per unit) Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit a. Available capacity is in escalated dollars. annual > b. RDA funds are prorated for available capacity. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY ,552,059 47,146,381 48,796,504 50,504,382 52,272,035 54,101,557 55,995,111 57,954,940 59,983,363 62,082,781 45,552,059 47,146,381 48,796,504 50,504,382 52,272,035 54,101,557 55,995,111 57,954,940 59,983,363 62,082,781 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 6,216,456 1,262,727 1,193,447 1,120,246 1,043, , , , , , ,960 7,479,183 7,409,903 7,336,702 7,259,578 7,178,534 7,092,914 7,002,719 6,907,949 6,807,297 6,701,416 38,072,876 39,736,478 41,459,803 43,244,804 45,093,502 47,008,642 48,992,392 51,046,991 53,176,066 55,381,364 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1,190 $1,242 $1,296 $1,351 $1,409 $1,469 $1,531 $1,595 $1,662 $1,731 $1,190 $1,242 $1,296 $1,351 $1,409 $1,469 $1,531 $1,595 $1,662 $1,731 $1,190 $1,250 $1,300 $1,360 $1,410 $1,470 $1,540 $1,600 $1,670 $1,740 $1,190 $1,250 $1,300 $1,360 $1,410 $1,470 $1,540 $1,600 $1,670 $1,740 $2,980 $3,110 $3,240 $3,380 $3,530 $3,680 $3,830 $3,990 $4,160 $4,330 $5,950 $6,210 $6,480 $6,760 $7,050 $7,350 $7,660 $7,980 $8,310 $8,660 $9,520 $9,940 $10,370 $10,820 $11,280 $11,760 $12,250 $12,770 $13,300 $13,850 $19,040 $19,870 $20,730 $21,630 $22,550 $23,510 $24,500 $25,530 $26,590 $27,700 $29,750 $31,050 $32,400 $33,790 $35,230 $36,730 $38,280 $39,890 $41,550 $43,270 $59,490 $62,090 $64,790 $67,580 $70,460 $73,460 $76,560 $79,770 $83,090 $86,540 $107,080 $111,760 $116,610 $121,630 $126,830 $132,220 $137,800 $143,570 $149,560 $155,770 $172,520 $180,060 $187,870 $195,960 $204,330 $213,010 $222,000 $231,310 $240,960 $250,950 $255,810 $266,980 $278,560 $290,560 $302,980 $315,840 $329,170 $342,980 $357,280 $372,100 $1,190 $1,250 $1,300 $1,360 $1,410 $1,470 $1,540 $1,600 $1,670 $1,740 $1,190 $1,250 $1,300 $1,360 $1,410 $1,470 $1,540 $1,600 $1,670 $1, $680 $710 $750 $780 $810 $840 $880 $920 $950 $ % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.9 WTPFRC 5/3/2005

53 Table 2.10 SE 20-inch Transmission Main Facility Reserve Charge Item SE 20-inch Transmission Line Debt Service Cost (a) $8,829,238 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 3,754 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $2,352 Roundup to the next $10 $2,360 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $2,360 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $2,360 1-inch meter 2.5 $5, /2-inch meter 5.0 $11,760 2-inch meter 8.0 $18,820 3-inch meter 16.0 $37,640 4-inch meter 25.0 $58,800 6-inch meter 50.0 $117,600 8-inch meter 90.0 $211, inch meter $341, inch meter $505,680 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $2,360 Duplex (per unit) $2,360 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use 350 Multiple Family Average Use 200 Average Use Ratio 0.57 Per Dwelling Unit $1,350 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.10 SE20inFRC 5/3/2005

54 Table 2.11 Zone I/II Reservoir Facility Reserve Charge Item Zone I/II Reservoir Debt Service Cost (a) $9,101,253 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 3,052 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $2,982 Roundup to the next $10 $2,990 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $2,990 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $2,990 1-inch meter 2.5 $7, /2-inch meter 5.0 $14,920 2-inch meter 8.0 $23,860 3-inch meter 16.0 $47,720 4-inch meter 25.0 $74,560 6-inch meter 50.0 $149,110 8-inch meter 90.0 $268, inch meter $432, inch meter $641,150 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $2,990 Duplex (per unit) $2,990 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use 350 Multiple Family Average Use 200 Average Use Ratio 0.57 Per Dwelling Unit $1,710 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.11 Zone I-IIResFRC 5/3/2005

55 Table 2.12a SW Hills Debt Service Allocation Development and Percentage of Project Debt Service Project Name Construction Phase Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Total Debt Service Transmission Mains Segment 1a Phase III Percent of Project Cost 26% 0% 23% 14% 0% 0% 16% 7% 4% 10% 100% Cost per Development $2,564,304 $0 $2,268,423 $1,380,779 $0 $0 $1,578,033 $690,389 $394,508 $986,271 $9,862,707 Segments 1b-5D Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 21% 2% 6% 4% 46% 4% 10% 1% 0% 6% 100% Cost per Development $2,075,101 $183,911 $553,919 $367,581 $4,513,757 $357,841 $1,014,053 $73,960 $38,993 $632,052 $9,811,169 Storage Tanks W. Leland Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 23% 0% 18% 15% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Cost per Development $2,446,329 $0 $1,983,510 $1,586,808 $4,738,384 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,755,030 W. Leland Phase III Percent of Project Cost 23% 0% 18% 15% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Cost per Development $2,196,625 $0 $1,781,048 $1,424,838 $4,254,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,657,236 Pump Stations Zone II and Zone III Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 12% 0% 8% 5% 44% 7% 10% 5% 1% 8% 100% Cost per Development $642,075 $0 $419,446 $258,121 $2,432,788 $364,596 $574,319 $287,159 $64,530 $442,032 $5,485,065 Zone IV PS (San Marco) Phase III Percent of Project Cost 2% 0% 0% 0% 41% 15% 26% 0% 0% 16% 100% Cost per Development $41,095 $0 $0 $0 $842,439 $308,209 $534,230 $0 $0 $328,757 $2,054,730 Total All Development Projects $9,965,529 $183,911 $7,006,345 $5,018,127 $16,782,093 $1,030,646 $3,700,635 $1,051,509 $498,032 $2,389,111 $47,625,937

56 Table 2.12b SW Hills Project Cost Allocation Development and Percentage of Project Cost (Escalated $) Project Name Construction Phase Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Total Project Cost Transmission Mains Segment 1a Phase III Percent of Project Cost 26% 0% 23% 14% 0% 0% 16% 7% 4% 10% 100% Cost per Development $1,268,921 $0 $1,122,507 $683,265 $0 $0 $780,874 $341,633 $195,219 $488,046 $4,880,465 Segments 1b-5D Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 21% 2% 6% 4% 46% 4% 10% 1% 0% 6% 100% Cost per Development $1,026,844 $91,007 $274,101 $181,894 $2,233,589 $177,074 $501,794 $36,598 $19,296 $312,765 $4,854,962 Storage Tanks W. Leland Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 23% 0% 18% 15% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Cost per Development $1,210,542 $0 $981,521 $785,216 $2,344,744 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,322,023 W. Leland Phase III Percent of Project Cost 23% 0% 18% 15% 44% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% Cost per Development $1,086,979 $0 $881,334 $705,067 $2,105,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,778,789 Pump Stations Zone II and Zone III Phase I/II Percent of Project Cost 12% 0% 8% 5% 44% 7% 10% 5% 1% 8% 100% Cost per Development $317,725 $0 $207,559 $127,728 $1,203,841 $180,417 $284,196 $142,098 $31,932 $218,735 $2,714,231 Zone IV PS (San Marco) Phase III Percent of Project Cost 2% 0% 0% 0% 41% 15% 26% 0% 0% 16% 100% Cost per Development $20,335 $0 $0 $0 $416,873 $152,514 $264,358 $0 $0 $162,682 $1,016,763 Total All Development Projects $4,931,345 $91,007 $3,467,022 $2,483,171 $8,304,456 $510,005 $1,831,223 $520,329 $246,446 $1,182,228 $23,567,234

57 Table 2.13a SW Hills Debt Service by Project Phase Project Name Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point Development and Percentage of Project Debt Service San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development PHASE I/II PROJECTS Transmission Mains Segments 1b-5D Cost per Development $2,075,101 $183,911 $553,919 $367,581 $4,513,757 $357,841 $1,014,053 $73,960 $38,993 $632,052 $9,811,169 Storage Tanks W. Leland Cost per Development $2,446,329 $0 $1,983,510 $1,586,808 $4,738,384 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,755,030 Pump Stations Zone II and Zone III Cost per Development $642,075 $0 $419,446 $258,121 $2,432,788 $364,596 $574,319 $287,159 $64,530 $442,032 $5,485,065 Total Phase I/II Cost per Development $5,163,505 $183,911 $2,956,874 $2,212,510 $11,684,929 $722,437 $1,588,372 $361,120 $103,524 $1,074,083 $26,051,265 PHASE III PROJECTS Transmission Mains Segment 1a Cost per Development $2,564,304 $0 $2,268,423 $1,380,779 $0 $0 $1,578,033 $690,389 $394,508 $986,271 $9,862,707 Storage Tanks W. Leland Phase III Cost per Development $2,196,625 $0 $1,781,048 $1,424,838 $4,254,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,657,236 Pump Stations Zone IV PS (San Marco) Phase III Cost per Development $41,095 $0 $0 $0 $842,439 $308,209 $534,230 $0 $0 $328,757 $2,054,730 Total Phase III Cost per Development $4,802,024 $0 $4,049,470 $2,805,617 $5,097,164 $308,209 $2,112,263 $690,389 $394,508 $1,315,027 $21,574,672 Total All Development Projects $9,965,529 $183,911 $7,006,345 $5,018,127 $16,782,093 $1,030,646 $3,700,635 $1,051,509 $498,032 $2,389,111 $47,625,937

58 Table 2.13b SW Hills Project Cost by Project Phase Project Name Alves Oak Hills West Coast Development and Percentage of Project Cost (Escalated $) Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development PHASE I/II PROJECTS Transmission Mains Segments 1b-5D Cost per Development $1,026,844 $91,007 $274,101 $181,894 $2,233,589 $177,074 $501,794 $36,598 $19,296 $312,765 $4,854,962 Storage Tanks W. Leland Cost per Development $1,210,542 $0 $981,521 $785,216 $2,344,744 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,322,023 Pump Stations Zone II and Zone III Cost per Development $317,725 $0 $207,559 $127,728 $1,203,841 $180,417 $284,196 $142,098 $31,932 $218,735 $2,714,231 Total Phase I/II Cost per Development $2,555,111 $91,007 $1,463,181 $1,094,839 $5,782,174 $357,491 $785,990 $178,696 $51,228 $531,500 $12,891,216 PHASE III PROJECTS Transmission Mains Segment 1a Cost per Development $1,268,921 $0 $1,122,507 $683,265 $0 $0 $780,874 $341,633 $195,219 $488,046 $4,880,465 Storage Tanks W. Leland Phase III Cost per Development $1,086,979 $0 $881,334 $705,067 $2,105,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,778,789 Pump Stations Zone IV PS (San Marco) Phase III Cost per Development $20,335 $0 $0 $0 $416,873 $152,514 $264,358 $0 $0 $162,682 $1,016,763 Total Phase III Cost per Development $2,376,235 $0 $2,003,841 $1,388,332 $2,522,282 $152,514 $1,045,233 $341,633 $195,219 $650,729 $10,676,018 Total All Development Projects $4,931,345 $91,007 $3,467,022 $2,483,171 $8,304,456 $510,005 $1,831,223 $520,329 $246,446 $1,182,228 $23,567,234

59 Table 2.14a SW Hills Phase I/II Project Debt Service Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $5,163,505 $183,911 $2,956,874 $2,212,510 $11,684,929 $722,437 $1,588,372 $361,120 $103,524 $1,074,083 $26,051,265 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $4,673 $131 $2,957 $3,750 $3,977 $2,890 $2,269 $1,204 $690 $2,469 $2,935 Roundup to the next $10 $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 $2,940 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 $2,940 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 $2,940 1-inch meter 2.5 $11,690 $330 $7,400 $9,380 $9,950 $7,230 $5,680 $3,010 $1,730 $6,180 $7, /2-inch meter 5.0 $23,370 $660 $14,790 $18,760 $19,890 $14,450 $11,350 $6,020 $3,460 $12,350 $14,680 2-inch meter 8.0 $37,390 $1,050 $23,660 $30,010 $31,820 $23,120 $18,160 $9,630 $5,530 $19,760 $23,480 3-inch meter 16.0 $74,770 $2,090 $47,310 $60,010 $63,640 $46,240 $36,310 $19,260 $11,050 $39,510 $46,960 4-inch meter 25.0 $116,830 $3,270 $73,930 $93,760 $99,430 $72,250 $56,730 $30,100 $17,260 $61,730 $73,370 6-inch meter 50.0 $233,650 $6,530 $147,850 $187,510 $198,860 $144,490 $113,460 $60,190 $34,510 $123,460 $146,740 8-inch meter 90.0 $420,560 $11,750 $266,120 $337,510 $357,950 $260,080 $204,220 $108,340 $62,120 $222,230 $264, inch meter $677,570 $18,930 $428,750 $543,760 $576,690 $419,020 $329,020 $174,550 $100,080 $358,030 $425, inch meter $1,004,670 $28,070 $635,730 $806,260 $855,100 $621,300 $487,860 $258,810 $148,390 $530,870 $630,960 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 $2,940 Duplex (per unit) $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 $2,940 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $2,680 $80 $1,690 $2,150 $2,280 $1,660 $1,300 $690 $400 $1,420 $1,680 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.14a SWHillsFRC PhI-II 5/3/2005

60 Table 2.14b SW Hills Phase I/II Project Costs Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $2,555,111 $91,007 $1,463,181 $1,094,839 $5,782,174 $357,491 $785,990 $178,696 $51,228 $531,500 $12,891,216 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $2,312 $65 $1,463 $1,856 $1,968 $1,430 $1,123 $596 $342 $1,222 $1,452 Roundup to the next $10 $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 $1,460 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 $1,460 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 $1,460 1-inch meter 2.5 $5,790 $170 $3,660 $4,640 $4,930 $3,580 $2,810 $1,490 $860 $3,060 $3, /2-inch meter 5.0 $11,570 $330 $7,320 $9,280 $9,850 $7,150 $5,620 $2,980 $1,710 $6,110 $7,270 2-inch meter 8.0 $18,500 $520 $11,710 $14,850 $15,750 $11,440 $8,990 $4,770 $2,740 $9,780 $11,620 3-inch meter 16.0 $37,000 $1,040 $23,420 $29,700 $31,490 $22,880 $17,970 $9,540 $5,470 $19,550 $23,240 4-inch meter 25.0 $57,810 $1,620 $36,580 $46,400 $49,210 $35,750 $28,080 $14,900 $8,540 $30,550 $36,310 6-inch meter 50.0 $115,620 $3,230 $73,160 $92,790 $98,410 $71,500 $56,150 $29,790 $17,080 $61,100 $72,620 8-inch meter 90.0 $208,110 $5,820 $131,690 $167,010 $177,130 $128,700 $101,060 $53,610 $30,740 $109,970 $130, inch meter $335,290 $9,370 $212,170 $269,080 $285,370 $207,350 $162,820 $86,370 $49,530 $177,170 $210, inch meter $497,150 $13,890 $314,590 $398,970 $423,140 $307,450 $241,420 $128,070 $73,430 $262,700 $312,230 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 $1,460 Duplex (per unit) $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 $1,460 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $1,330 $40 $840 $1,070 $1,130 $820 $650 $350 $200 $700 $830 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.14b SWHillsFRC PhI-II 5/3/2005

61 Table 2.15a SW Hills Phase III Project Debt Service Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $4,802,024 $0 $4,049,470 $2,805,617 $5,097,164 $308,209 $2,112,263 $690,389 $394,508 $1,315,027 $21,574,672 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $4,346 $0 $4,049 $4,755 $1,735 $1,233 $3,018 $2,301 $2,630 $3,023 $2,430 Roundup to the next $10 $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 $2,440 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 $2,440 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 $2,440 1-inch meter 2.5 $10,870 $0 $10,130 $11,890 $4,340 $3,090 $7,550 $5,760 $6,580 $7,560 $6, /2-inch meter 5.0 $21,730 $0 $20,250 $23,780 $8,680 $6,170 $15,090 $11,510 $13,160 $15,120 $12,160 2-inch meter 8.0 $34,770 $0 $32,400 $38,050 $13,880 $9,870 $24,150 $18,420 $21,050 $24,190 $19,450 3-inch meter 16.0 $69,540 $0 $64,800 $76,090 $27,760 $19,730 $48,290 $36,830 $42,090 $48,370 $38,890 4-inch meter 25.0 $108,650 $0 $101,240 $118,890 $43,380 $30,830 $75,440 $57,540 $65,760 $75,580 $60,770 6-inch meter 50.0 $217,290 $0 $202,480 $237,770 $86,750 $61,650 $150,880 $115,070 $131,510 $151,160 $121,530 8-inch meter 90.0 $391,120 $0 $364,460 $427,980 $156,150 $110,960 $271,580 $207,120 $236,710 $272,080 $218, inch meter $630,130 $0 $587,180 $689,520 $251,570 $178,770 $437,550 $333,690 $381,360 $438,350 $352, inch meter $934,340 $0 $870,640 $1,022,390 $373,010 $265,070 $648,770 $494,780 $565,470 $649,960 $522,540 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 $2,440 Duplex (per unit) $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 $2,440 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $2,490 $0 $2,320 $2,720 $1,000 $710 $1,730 $1,320 $1,510 $1,730 $1,390 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.15a SWHillsFRC PhIII 5/3/2005

62 Table 2.15b SW Hills Phase III Project Costs Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $2,376,235 $0 $2,003,841 $1,388,332 $2,522,282 $152,514 $1,045,233 $341,633 $195,219 $650,729 $10,676,018 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $2,150 $0 $2,004 $2,353 $859 $610 $1,493 $1,139 $1,301 $1,496 $1,203 Roundup to the next $10 $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 $1,210 Facility Reserve Charges Equivalency Nonresidential (roundup to next $10) Factor (c) 5/8-inch meter 1.0 $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 $1,210 3/4-inch meter 1.0 $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 $1,210 1-inch meter 2.5 $5,380 $0 $5,010 $5,890 $2,150 $1,530 $3,740 $2,850 $3,260 $3,740 $3, /2-inch meter 5.0 $10,760 $0 $10,020 $11,770 $4,300 $3,060 $7,470 $5,700 $6,510 $7,480 $6,020 2-inch meter 8.0 $17,210 $0 $16,040 $18,830 $6,870 $4,890 $11,950 $9,120 $10,420 $11,970 $9,630 3-inch meter 16.0 $34,410 $0 $32,070 $37,650 $13,740 $9,770 $23,900 $18,230 $20,830 $23,940 $19,250 4-inch meter 25.0 $53,770 $0 $50,100 $58,830 $21,470 $15,260 $37,330 $28,470 $32,540 $37,400 $30,070 6-inch meter 50.0 $107,530 $0 $100,200 $117,660 $42,930 $30,510 $74,660 $56,940 $65,080 $74,800 $60,140 8-inch meter 90.0 $193,540 $0 $180,350 $211,780 $77,270 $54,910 $134,390 $102,490 $117,140 $134,640 $108, inch meter $311,820 $0 $290,560 $341,210 $124,490 $88,460 $216,520 $165,130 $188,720 $216,910 $174, inch meter $462,350 $0 $430,830 $505,920 $184,580 $131,170 $321,040 $244,840 $279,820 $321,630 $258,580 Residential (roundup to next $10) Single Family $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 $1,210 Duplex (per unit) $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 $1,210 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $1,230 $0 $1,150 $1,350 $500 $350 $860 $660 $750 $860 $690 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.15b SWHillsFRC PhIII 5/3/2005

63 Table 2.16a SW Hills All Phases Project Debt Service Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $9,965,529 $183,911 $7,006,345 $5,018,127 $16,782,093 $1,030,646 $3,700,635 $1,051,509 $498,032 $2,389,111 $47,625,937 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $9,019 $131 $7,006 $8,505 $5,712 $4,123 $5,287 $3,505 $3,320 $5,492 $5,365 Sum of Phase I/II and III Roundup Values $9,030 $140 $7,010 $8,520 $5,720 $4,130 $5,290 $3,520 $3,340 $5,500 $5,380 Facility Reserve Charges Nonresidential (sum of rounded) 5/8-inch meter $9,030 $140 $7,010 $8,520 $5,720 $4,130 $5,290 $3,520 $3,340 $5,500 $5,380 3/4-inch meter $9,030 $140 $7,010 $8,520 $5,720 $4,130 $5,290 $3,520 $3,340 $5,500 $5,380 1-inch meter $22,560 $330 $17,530 $21,270 $14,290 $10,320 $13,230 $8,770 $8,310 $13,740 $13, /2-inch meter $45,100 $660 $35,040 $42,540 $28,570 $20,620 $26,440 $17,530 $16,620 $27,470 $26,840 2-inch meter $72,160 $1,050 $56,060 $68,060 $45,700 $32,990 $42,310 $28,050 $26,580 $43,950 $42,930 3-inch meter $144,310 $2,090 $112,110 $136,100 $91,400 $65,970 $84,600 $56,090 $53,140 $87,880 $85,850 4-inch meter $225,480 $3,270 $175,170 $212,650 $142,810 $103,080 $132,170 $87,640 $83,020 $137,310 $134,140 6-inch meter $450,940 $6,530 $350,330 $425,280 $285,610 $206,140 $264,340 $175,260 $166,020 $274,620 $268,270 8-inch meter $811,680 $11,750 $630,580 $765,490 $514,100 $371,040 $475,800 $315,460 $298,830 $494,310 $482, inch meter $1,307,700 $18,930 $1,015,930 $1,233,280 $828,260 $597,790 $766,570 $508,240 $481,440 $796,380 $777, inch meter $1,939,010 $28,070 $1,506,370 $1,828,650 $1,228,110 $886,370 $1,136,630 $753,590 $713,860 $1,180,830 $1,153,500 Residential (sum of rounded) Single Family $9,030 $140 $7,010 $8,520 $5,720 $4,130 $5,290 $3,520 $3,340 $5,500 $5,380 Duplex (per unit) $9,030 $140 $7,010 $8,520 $5,720 $4,130 $5,290 $3,520 $3,340 $5,500 $5,380 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $5,170 $80 $4,010 $4,870 $3,280 $2,370 $3,030 $2,010 $1,910 $3,150 $3,070 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.16a SWHillsFRC AllPh 5/3/2005

64 Table 2.16b SW Hills All Phases Project Costs Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Development Area Unit Costs and FRCs Item Alves Oak Hills West Coast Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Average All Development SW Hills CIP Debt Service Cost (a) $4,931,345 $91,007 $3,467,022 $2,483,171 $8,304,456 $510,005 $1,831,223 $520,329 $246,446 $1,182,228 $23,567,234 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (b) 1,105 1,409 1, , ,877 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $4,463 $65 $3,467 $4,209 $2,827 $2,040 $2,616 $1,734 $1,643 $2,718 $2,655 Sum of Phase I/II and III Roundup Values $4,480 $70 $3,480 $4,220 $2,830 $2,050 $2,630 $1,740 $1,660 $2,730 $2,670 Facility Reserve Charges Nonresidential (sum of rounded) 5/8-inch meter $4,480 $70 $3,480 $4,220 $2,830 $2,050 $2,630 $1,740 $1,660 $2,730 $2,670 3/4-inch meter $4,480 $70 $3,480 $4,220 $2,830 $2,050 $2,630 $1,740 $1,660 $2,730 $2,670 1-inch meter $11,170 $170 $8,670 $10,530 $7,080 $5,110 $6,550 $4,340 $4,120 $6,800 $6, /2-inch meter $22,330 $330 $17,340 $21,050 $14,150 $10,210 $13,090 $8,680 $8,220 $13,590 $13,290 2-inch meter $35,710 $520 $27,750 $33,680 $22,620 $16,330 $20,940 $13,890 $13,160 $21,750 $21,250 3-inch meter $71,410 $1,040 $55,490 $67,350 $45,230 $32,650 $41,870 $27,770 $26,300 $43,490 $42,490 4-inch meter $111,580 $1,620 $86,680 $105,230 $70,680 $51,010 $65,410 $43,370 $41,080 $67,950 $66,380 6-inch meter $223,150 $3,230 $173,360 $210,450 $141,340 $102,010 $130,810 $86,730 $82,160 $135,900 $132,760 8-inch meter $401,650 $5,820 $312,040 $378,790 $254,400 $183,610 $235,450 $156,100 $147,880 $244,610 $238, inch meter $647,110 $9,370 $502,730 $610,290 $409,860 $295,810 $379,340 $251,500 $238,250 $394,080 $384, inch meter $959,500 $13,890 $745,420 $904,890 $607,720 $438,620 $562,460 $372,910 $353,250 $584,330 $570,810 Residential (sum of rounded) Single Family $4,480 $70 $3,480 $4,220 $2,830 $2,050 $2,630 $1,740 $1,660 $2,730 $2,670 Duplex (per unit) $4,480 $70 $3,480 $4,220 $2,830 $2,050 $2,630 $1,740 $1,660 $2,730 $2,670 Multiple Family Reduction in Water Use Ratio Single Family Average Use Multiple Family Average Use Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit $2,560 $40 $1,990 $2,420 $1,630 $1,170 $1,510 $1,010 $950 $1,560 $1,520 Notes: a. Total debt service costs are from Table 2.6. b. The number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units is taken from the Water System Master Plan. c. An equivalency factor is a unit less value that expresses the capacity of a water meter in terms of the rated maximum capacity (in gallons per minute) of a standard meter. For example, using the rated maximum flow rate capacity for a ¾-inch meter as the standard, a single 1-inch meter is equivalent to about two, ¾-inch meters and a single 2-inch meter is equivalent to slightly more than five, ¾-inch meters. Rated maximum capacity for water meters is shown in Table 2-2 from Manual M6, Water Meters, published by the American Water Works Association. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.16b SWHillsFRC AllPh 5/3/2005

65 Table 2.17a FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (Debt Service for SW Hills) Water Facility Reserve Charge Alves Oak Hills West Coast Southwest Hills Development Areas Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Zones I and II; not SW Hills Zone III; not SW Hills Current Facility Reserve Charges $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges Distribution na na na na na na na na na na $980 $980 WTP $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 Zone I/II Reservoir na na na na na na na na na na $2,990 na SE 20-inch Trans Main na na na na na na na na na na $2,360 $2,360 SW Hills CIP, Phase I/II $4,680 $140 $2,960 $3,760 $3,980 $2,890 $2,270 $1,210 $700 $2,470 na na SW Hills CIP, Phase III $4,350 $0 $4,050 $4,760 $1,740 $1,240 $3,020 $2,310 $2,640 $3,030 na na Total Water FRC $9,820 $930 $7,800 $9,310 $6,510 $4,920 $6,080 $4,310 $4,130 $6,290 $7,120 $4,130

66 Table 2.17b FY 2005/06 Water FRC for Single Family (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Water Facility Reserve Charge Alves Oak Hills West Coast Southwest Hills Development Areas Pitts/Bay Point San Marco San Marco Hills San Marco Meadows Bailey Estates Smith Ridge Farms/ Bonneville Zones I and II; not SW Hills Zone III; not SW Hills Current Facility Reserve Charges $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 $656 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges Distribution na na na na na na na na na na $980 $980 WTP $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 $790 Zone I/II Reservoir na na na na na na na na na na $2,990 na SE 20-inch Trans Main na na na na na na na na na na $2,360 $2,360 SW Hills CIP, Phase I/II $2,320 $70 $1,470 $1,860 $1,970 $1,430 $1,130 $600 $350 $1,230 na na SW Hills CIP, Phase III $2,160 $0 $2,010 $2,360 $860 $620 $1,500 $1,140 $1,310 $1,500 na na Total Water FRC $5,270 $860 $4,270 $5,010 $3,620 $2,840 $3,420 $2,530 $2,450 $3,520 $7,120 $4,130

67 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY Zones I and II; not SW Hills Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 3/4-inch meter $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 1-inch meter $17,750 $17,950 $18,170 $18,390 $18, /2-inch meter $35,490 $35,900 $36,340 $36,780 $37,490 2-inch meter $56,770 $57,430 $58,130 $58,840 $59,980 3-inch meter $113,530 $114,860 $116,240 $117,670 $119,940 4-inch meter $177,360 $179,450 $181,610 $183,830 $187,380 6-inch meter $354,710 $358,880 $363,190 $367,630 $374,750 8-inch meter $638,460 $645,960 $653,710 $661,730 $674, inch meter $1,028,630 $1,040,710 $1,053,190 $1,066,110 $1,086, inch meter $1,525,210 $1,543,120 $1,561,630 $1,580,770 $1,611,390 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 Duplex (per unit) $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $4,080 $4,130 $4,170 $4,220 $4,310 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

68 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY Zone III; not SW Hills Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 3/4-inch meter $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 1-inch meter $10,290 $10,490 $10,710 $10,930 $11, /2-inch meter $20,570 $20,980 $21,420 $21,860 $22,570 2-inch meter $32,910 $33,570 $34,270 $34,980 $36,120 3-inch meter $65,810 $67,140 $68,520 $69,950 $72,220 4-inch meter $102,800 $104,890 $107,050 $109,270 $112,820 6-inch meter $205,600 $209,770 $214,080 $218,520 $225,640 8-inch meter $370,070 $377,570 $385,320 $393,340 $406, inch meter $596,230 $608,310 $620,790 $633,710 $654, inch meter $884,060 $901,970 $920,480 $939,620 $970,240 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 Duplex (per unit) $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,370 $2,420 $2,460 $2,510 $2,600 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

69 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Alves Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $9,820 $9,860 $9,900 $9,940 $10,030 3/4-inch meter $9,820 $9,860 $9,900 $9,940 $10,030 1-inch meter $24,540 $24,630 $24,730 $24,830 $25, /2-inch meter $49,050 $49,240 $49,440 $49,640 $50,100 2-inch meter $78,480 $78,780 $79,100 $79,420 $80,160 3-inch meter $156,950 $157,550 $158,180 $158,830 $160,300 4-inch meter $245,220 $246,170 $247,150 $248,160 $250,460 6-inch meter $490,420 $492,310 $494,270 $496,290 $500,900 8-inch meter $882,740 $886,140 $889,660 $893,310 $901, inch meter $1,422,190 $1,427,670 $1,433,340 $1,439,210 $1,452, inch meter $2,108,770 $2,116,890 $2,125,300 $2,134,000 $2,153,820 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $9,820 $9,860 $9,900 $9,940 $10,030 Duplex (per unit) $9,820 $9,860 $9,900 $9,940 $10,030 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $5,630 $5,650 $5,670 $5,690 $5,750 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

70 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Oak Hills Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $930 $970 $1,010 $1,050 $1,140 3/4-inch meter $930 $970 $1,010 $1,050 $1,140 1-inch meter $2,310 $2,400 $2,500 $2,600 $2, /2-inch meter $4,610 $4,800 $5,000 $5,200 $5,660 2-inch meter $7,370 $7,670 $7,990 $8,310 $9,050 3-inch meter $14,730 $15,330 $15,960 $16,610 $18,080 4-inch meter $23,010 $23,960 $24,940 $25,950 $28,250 6-inch meter $46,010 $47,900 $49,860 $51,880 $56,490 8-inch meter $82,810 $86,210 $89,730 $93,380 $101, inch meter $133,420 $138,900 $144,570 $150,440 $163, inch meter $197,830 $205,950 $214,360 $223,060 $242,880 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $930 $970 $1,010 $1,050 $1,140 Duplex (per unit) $930 $970 $1,010 $1,050 $1,140 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $540 $560 $580 $600 $660 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

71 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, West Coast Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $7,800 $7,840 $7,880 $7,920 $8,010 3/4-inch meter $7,800 $7,840 $7,880 $7,920 $8,010 1-inch meter $19,510 $19,600 $19,700 $19,800 $20, /2-inch meter $38,990 $39,180 $39,380 $39,580 $40,040 2-inch meter $62,380 $62,680 $63,000 $63,320 $64,060 3-inch meter $124,750 $125,350 $125,980 $126,630 $128,100 4-inch meter $194,910 $195,860 $196,840 $197,850 $200,150 6-inch meter $389,810 $391,700 $393,660 $395,680 $400,290 8-inch meter $701,640 $705,040 $708,560 $712,210 $720, inch meter $1,130,420 $1,135,900 $1,141,570 $1,147,440 $1,160, inch meter $1,676,130 $1,684,250 $1,692,660 $1,701,360 $1,721,180 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $7,800 $7,840 $7,880 $7,920 $8,010 Duplex (per unit) $7,800 $7,840 $7,880 $7,920 $8,010 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $4,470 $4,490 $4,510 $4,530 $4,590 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

72 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Pitts/Bay Point Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $9,310 $9,350 $9,390 $9,430 $9,520 3/4-inch meter $9,310 $9,350 $9,390 $9,430 $9,520 1-inch meter $23,250 $23,340 $23,440 $23,540 $23, /2-inch meter $46,490 $46,680 $46,880 $47,080 $47,540 2-inch meter $74,380 $74,680 $75,000 $75,320 $76,060 3-inch meter $148,740 $149,340 $149,970 $150,620 $152,090 4-inch meter $232,390 $233,340 $234,320 $235,330 $237,630 6-inch meter $464,760 $466,650 $468,610 $470,630 $475,240 8-inch meter $836,550 $839,950 $843,470 $847,120 $855, inch meter $1,347,770 $1,353,250 $1,358,920 $1,364,790 $1,378, inch meter $1,998,410 $2,006,530 $2,014,940 $2,023,640 $2,043,460 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $9,310 $9,350 $9,390 $9,430 $9,520 Duplex (per unit) $9,310 $9,350 $9,390 $9,430 $9,520 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $5,330 $5,350 $5,370 $5,390 $5,450 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

73 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $6,510 $6,550 $6,590 $6,630 $6,720 3/4-inch meter $6,510 $6,550 $6,590 $6,630 $6,720 1-inch meter $16,270 $16,360 $16,460 $16,560 $16, /2-inch meter $32,520 $32,710 $32,910 $33,110 $33,570 2-inch meter $52,020 $52,320 $52,640 $52,960 $53,700 3-inch meter $104,040 $104,640 $105,270 $105,920 $107,390 4-inch meter $162,550 $163,500 $164,480 $165,490 $167,790 6-inch meter $325,090 $326,980 $328,940 $330,960 $335,570 8-inch meter $585,160 $588,560 $592,080 $595,730 $604, inch meter $942,750 $948,230 $953,900 $959,770 $973, inch meter $1,397,870 $1,405,990 $1,414,400 $1,423,100 $1,442,920 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $6,510 $6,550 $6,590 $6,630 $6,720 Duplex (per unit) $6,510 $6,550 $6,590 $6,630 $6,720 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $3,740 $3,760 $3,780 $3,800 $3,860 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

74 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Hills Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,920 $4,960 $5,000 $5,040 $5,130 3/4-inch meter $4,920 $4,960 $5,000 $5,040 $5,130 1-inch meter $12,300 $12,390 $12,490 $12,590 $12, /2-inch meter $24,570 $24,760 $24,960 $25,160 $25,620 2-inch meter $39,310 $39,610 $39,930 $40,250 $40,990 3-inch meter $78,610 $79,210 $79,840 $80,490 $81,960 4-inch meter $122,820 $123,770 $124,750 $125,760 $128,060 6-inch meter $245,620 $247,510 $249,470 $251,490 $256,100 8-inch meter $442,100 $445,500 $449,020 $452,670 $460, inch meter $712,280 $717,760 $723,430 $729,300 $742, inch meter $1,056,130 $1,064,250 $1,072,660 $1,081,360 $1,101,180 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,920 $4,960 $5,000 $5,040 $5,130 Duplex (per unit) $4,920 $4,960 $5,000 $5,040 $5,130 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,830 $2,850 $2,870 $2,890 $2,950 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

75 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Meadows Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $6,080 $6,120 $6,160 $6,200 $6,290 3/4-inch meter $6,080 $6,120 $6,160 $6,200 $6,290 1-inch meter $15,210 $15,300 $15,400 $15,500 $15, /2-inch meter $30,390 $30,580 $30,780 $30,980 $31,440 2-inch meter $48,630 $48,930 $49,250 $49,570 $50,310 3-inch meter $97,240 $97,840 $98,470 $99,120 $100,590 4-inch meter $151,910 $152,860 $153,840 $154,850 $157,150 6-inch meter $303,820 $305,710 $307,670 $309,690 $314,300 8-inch meter $546,860 $550,260 $553,780 $557,430 $565, inch meter $881,060 $886,540 $892,210 $898,080 $911, inch meter $1,306,390 $1,314,510 $1,322,920 $1,331,620 $1,351,440 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $6,080 $6,120 $6,160 $6,200 $6,290 Duplex (per unit) $6,080 $6,120 $6,160 $6,200 $6,290 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $3,490 $3,510 $3,530 $3,550 $3,610 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

76 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Bailey Estates Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,430 $4,520 3/4-inch meter $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,430 $4,520 1-inch meter $10,750 $10,840 $10,940 $11,040 $11, /2-inch meter $21,480 $21,670 $21,870 $22,070 $22,530 2-inch meter $34,370 $34,670 $34,990 $35,310 $36,050 3-inch meter $68,730 $69,330 $69,960 $70,610 $72,080 4-inch meter $107,380 $108,330 $109,310 $110,320 $112,620 6-inch meter $214,740 $216,630 $218,590 $220,610 $225,220 8-inch meter $386,520 $389,920 $393,440 $397,090 $405, inch meter $622,730 $628,210 $633,880 $639,750 $653, inch meter $923,350 $931,470 $939,880 $948,580 $968,400 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,430 $4,520 Duplex (per unit) $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,430 $4,520 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,470 $2,490 $2,510 $2,530 $2,590 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

77 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Smith Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,130 $4,170 $4,210 $4,250 $4,340 3/4-inch meter $4,130 $4,170 $4,210 $4,250 $4,340 1-inch meter $10,290 $10,380 $10,480 $10,580 $10, /2-inch meter $20,570 $20,760 $20,960 $21,160 $21,620 2-inch meter $32,900 $33,200 $33,520 $33,840 $34,580 3-inch meter $65,780 $66,380 $67,010 $67,660 $69,130 4-inch meter $102,760 $103,710 $104,690 $105,700 $108,000 6-inch meter $205,500 $207,390 $209,350 $211,370 $215,980 8-inch meter $369,890 $373,290 $376,810 $380,460 $388, inch meter $595,930 $601,410 $607,080 $612,950 $626, inch meter $883,620 $891,740 $900,150 $908,850 $928,670 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,130 $4,170 $4,210 $4,250 $4,340 Duplex (per unit) $4,130 $4,170 $4,210 $4,250 $4,340 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,370 $2,390 $2,410 $2,430 $2,490 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

78 Table 2.18a Recommended Water FRCs (Debt Service for SW Hills) Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Ridge Farms/Bonneville Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $6,290 $6,330 $6,370 $6,410 $6,500 3/4-inch meter $6,290 $6,330 $6,370 $6,410 $6,500 1-inch meter $15,720 $15,810 $15,910 $16,010 $16, /2-inch meter $31,420 $31,610 $31,810 $32,010 $32,470 2-inch meter $50,270 $50,570 $50,890 $51,210 $51,950 3-inch meter $100,520 $101,120 $101,750 $102,400 $103,870 4-inch meter $157,050 $158,000 $158,980 $159,990 $162,290 6-inch meter $314,100 $315,990 $317,950 $319,970 $324,580 8-inch meter $565,370 $568,770 $572,290 $575,940 $584, inch meter $910,870 $916,350 $922,020 $927,890 $941, inch meter $1,350,590 $1,358,710 $1,367,120 $1,375,820 $1,395,640 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $6,290 $6,330 $6,370 $6,410 $6,500 Duplex (per unit) $6,290 $6,330 $6,370 $6,410 $6,500 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $3,610 $3,630 $3,650 $3,670 $3,730 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18a ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

79 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY Zones I and II; not SW Hills Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 3/4-inch meter $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 1-inch meter $17,750 $17,950 $18,170 $18,390 $18, /2-inch meter $35,490 $35,900 $36,340 $36,780 $37,490 2-inch meter $56,770 $57,430 $58,130 $58,840 $59,980 3-inch meter $113,530 $114,860 $116,240 $117,670 $119,940 4-inch meter $177,360 $179,450 $181,610 $183,830 $187,380 6-inch meter $354,710 $358,880 $363,190 $367,630 $374,750 8-inch meter $638,460 $645,960 $653,710 $661,730 $674, inch meter $1,028,630 $1,040,710 $1,053,190 $1,066,110 $1,086, inch meter $1,525,210 $1,543,120 $1,561,630 $1,580,770 $1,611,390 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 Duplex (per unit) $7,120 $7,200 $7,290 $7,380 $7,520 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $4,080 $4,130 $4,170 $4,220 $4,310 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

80 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY Zone III; not SW Hills Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 3/4-inch meter $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 1-inch meter $10,290 $10,490 $10,710 $10,930 $11, /2-inch meter $20,570 $20,980 $21,420 $21,860 $22,570 2-inch meter $32,910 $33,570 $34,270 $34,980 $36,120 3-inch meter $65,810 $67,140 $68,520 $69,950 $72,220 4-inch meter $102,800 $104,890 $107,050 $109,270 $112,820 6-inch meter $205,600 $209,770 $214,080 $218,520 $225,640 8-inch meter $370,070 $377,570 $385,320 $393,340 $406, inch meter $596,230 $608,310 $620,790 $633,710 $654, inch meter $884,060 $901,970 $920,480 $939,620 $970,240 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 Duplex (per unit) $4,130 $4,210 $4,300 $4,390 $4,530 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,370 $2,420 $2,460 $2,510 $2,600 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

81 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Alves Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $5,270 $5,310 $5,350 $5,390 $5,480 3/4-inch meter $5,270 $5,310 $5,350 $5,390 $5,480 1-inch meter $13,150 $13,240 $13,340 $13,440 $13, /2-inch meter $26,280 $26,470 $26,670 $26,870 $27,330 2-inch meter $42,030 $42,330 $42,650 $42,970 $43,710 3-inch meter $84,050 $84,650 $85,280 $85,930 $87,400 4-inch meter $131,320 $132,270 $133,250 $134,260 $136,560 6-inch meter $262,630 $264,520 $266,480 $268,500 $273,110 8-inch meter $472,710 $476,110 $479,630 $483,280 $491, inch meter $761,600 $767,080 $772,750 $778,620 $791, inch meter $1,129,260 $1,137,380 $1,145,790 $1,154,490 $1,174,310 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $5,270 $5,310 $5,350 $5,390 $5,480 Duplex (per unit) $5,270 $5,310 $5,350 $5,390 $5,480 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $3,020 $3,040 $3,060 $3,080 $3,140 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

82 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Oak Hills Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $860 $900 $940 $980 $1,070 3/4-inch meter $860 $900 $940 $980 $1,070 1-inch meter $2,150 $2,240 $2,340 $2,440 $2, /2-inch meter $4,280 $4,470 $4,670 $4,870 $5,330 2-inch meter $6,840 $7,140 $7,460 $7,780 $8,520 3-inch meter $13,680 $14,280 $14,910 $15,560 $17,030 4-inch meter $21,360 $22,310 $23,290 $24,300 $26,600 6-inch meter $42,710 $44,600 $46,560 $48,580 $53,190 8-inch meter $76,880 $80,280 $83,800 $87,450 $95, inch meter $123,860 $129,340 $135,010 $140,880 $154, inch meter $183,650 $191,770 $200,180 $208,880 $228,700 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $860 $900 $940 $980 $1,070 Duplex (per unit) $860 $900 $940 $980 $1,070 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $500 $520 $540 $560 $620 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

83 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, West Coast Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $4,270 $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,480 3/4-inch meter $4,270 $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,480 1-inch meter $10,650 $10,740 $10,840 $10,940 $11, /2-inch meter $21,290 $21,480 $21,680 $21,880 $22,340 2-inch meter $34,070 $34,370 $34,690 $35,010 $35,750 3-inch meter $68,130 $68,730 $69,360 $70,010 $71,480 4-inch meter $106,420 $107,370 $108,350 $109,360 $111,660 6-inch meter $212,840 $214,730 $216,690 $218,710 $223,320 8-inch meter $383,100 $386,500 $390,020 $393,670 $401, inch meter $617,220 $622,700 $628,370 $634,240 $647, inch meter $915,180 $923,300 $931,710 $940,410 $960,230 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,270 $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,480 Duplex (per unit) $4,270 $4,310 $4,350 $4,390 $4,480 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,450 $2,470 $2,490 $2,510 $2,570 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

84 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Pitts/Bay Point Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $5,010 $5,050 $5,090 $5,130 $5,220 3/4-inch meter $5,010 $5,050 $5,090 $5,130 $5,220 1-inch meter $12,510 $12,600 $12,700 $12,800 $13, /2-inch meter $25,000 $25,190 $25,390 $25,590 $26,050 2-inch meter $40,000 $40,300 $40,620 $40,940 $41,680 3-inch meter $79,990 $80,590 $81,220 $81,870 $83,340 4-inch meter $124,970 $125,920 $126,900 $127,910 $130,210 6-inch meter $249,930 $251,820 $253,780 $255,800 $260,410 8-inch meter $449,850 $453,250 $456,770 $460,420 $468, inch meter $724,780 $730,260 $735,930 $741,800 $755, inch meter $1,074,650 $1,082,770 $1,091,180 $1,099,880 $1,119,700 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $5,010 $5,050 $5,090 $5,130 $5,220 Duplex (per unit) $5,010 $5,050 $5,090 $5,130 $5,220 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,880 $2,900 $2,920 $2,940 $3,000 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

85 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $3,620 $3,660 $3,700 $3,740 $3,830 3/4-inch meter $3,620 $3,660 $3,700 $3,740 $3,830 1-inch meter $9,060 $9,150 $9,250 $9,350 $9, /2-inch meter $18,100 $18,290 $18,490 $18,690 $19,150 2-inch meter $28,940 $29,240 $29,560 $29,880 $30,620 3-inch meter $57,870 $58,470 $59,100 $59,750 $61,220 4-inch meter $90,420 $91,370 $92,350 $93,360 $95,660 6-inch meter $180,820 $182,710 $184,670 $186,690 $191,300 8-inch meter $325,460 $328,860 $332,380 $336,030 $344, inch meter $524,350 $529,830 $535,500 $541,370 $554, inch meter $777,480 $785,600 $794,010 $802,710 $822,530 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $3,620 $3,660 $3,700 $3,740 $3,830 Duplex (per unit) $3,620 $3,660 $3,700 $3,740 $3,830 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,090 $2,110 $2,130 $2,150 $2,210 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

86 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Hills Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $2,840 $2,880 $2,920 $2,960 $3,050 3/4-inch meter $2,840 $2,880 $2,920 $2,960 $3,050 1-inch meter $7,090 $7,180 $7,280 $7,380 $7, /2-inch meter $14,160 $14,350 $14,550 $14,750 $15,210 2-inch meter $22,650 $22,950 $23,270 $23,590 $24,330 3-inch meter $45,290 $45,890 $46,520 $47,170 $48,640 4-inch meter $70,750 $71,700 $72,680 $73,690 $75,990 6-inch meter $141,490 $143,380 $145,340 $147,360 $151,970 8-inch meter $254,670 $258,070 $261,590 $265,240 $273, inch meter $410,300 $415,780 $421,450 $427,320 $440, inch meter $608,380 $616,500 $624,910 $633,610 $653,430 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $2,840 $2,880 $2,920 $2,960 $3,050 Duplex (per unit) $2,840 $2,880 $2,920 $2,960 $3,050 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $1,630 $1,650 $1,670 $1,690 $1,750 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

87 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, San Marco Meadows Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $3,420 $3,460 $3,500 $3,540 $3,630 3/4-inch meter $3,420 $3,460 $3,500 $3,540 $3,630 1-inch meter $8,530 $8,620 $8,720 $8,820 $9, /2-inch meter $17,040 $17,230 $17,430 $17,630 $18,090 2-inch meter $27,260 $27,560 $27,880 $28,200 $28,940 3-inch meter $54,510 $55,110 $55,740 $56,390 $57,860 4-inch meter $85,150 $86,100 $87,080 $88,090 $90,390 6-inch meter $170,290 $172,180 $174,140 $176,160 $180,770 8-inch meter $306,510 $309,910 $313,430 $317,080 $325, inch meter $493,830 $499,310 $504,980 $510,850 $524, inch meter $732,220 $740,340 $748,750 $757,450 $777,270 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $3,420 $3,460 $3,500 $3,540 $3,630 Duplex (per unit) $3,420 $3,460 $3,500 $3,540 $3,630 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $1,970 $1,990 $2,010 $2,030 $2,090 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

88 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Bailey Estates Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $2,530 $2,570 $2,610 $2,650 $2,740 3/4-inch meter $2,530 $2,570 $2,610 $2,650 $2,740 1-inch meter $6,320 $6,410 $6,510 $6,610 $6, /2-inch meter $12,630 $12,820 $13,020 $13,220 $13,680 2-inch meter $20,210 $20,510 $20,830 $21,150 $21,890 3-inch meter $40,410 $41,010 $41,640 $42,290 $43,760 4-inch meter $63,110 $64,060 $65,040 $66,050 $68,350 6-inch meter $126,210 $128,100 $130,060 $132,080 $136,690 8-inch meter $227,160 $230,560 $234,080 $237,730 $246, inch meter $365,990 $371,470 $377,140 $383,010 $396, inch meter $542,670 $550,790 $559,200 $567,900 $587,720 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $2,530 $2,570 $2,610 $2,650 $2,740 Duplex (per unit) $2,530 $2,570 $2,610 $2,650 $2,740 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $1,470 $1,490 $1,510 $1,530 $1,590 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

89 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Smith Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $2,450 $2,490 $2,530 $2,570 $2,660 3/4-inch meter $2,450 $2,490 $2,530 $2,570 $2,660 1-inch meter $6,100 $6,190 $6,290 $6,390 $6, /2-inch meter $12,170 $12,360 $12,560 $12,760 $13,220 2-inch meter $19,480 $19,780 $20,100 $20,420 $21,160 3-inch meter $38,940 $39,540 $40,170 $40,820 $42,290 4-inch meter $60,820 $61,770 $62,750 $63,760 $66,060 6-inch meter $121,640 $123,530 $125,490 $127,510 $132,120 8-inch meter $218,940 $222,340 $225,860 $229,510 $237, inch meter $352,740 $358,220 $363,890 $369,760 $383, inch meter $523,010 $531,130 $539,540 $548,240 $568,060 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $2,450 $2,490 $2,530 $2,570 $2,660 Duplex (per unit) $2,450 $2,490 $2,530 $2,570 $2,660 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $1,410 $1,430 $1,450 $1,470 $1,530 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

90 Table 2.18b Recommended Water FRCs (Project Costs for SW Hills) Based on No Debt Service for SW Hills Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY SW Hills, Ridge Farms/Bonneville Development Area Nonresidential ($ per meter) 5/8-inch meter $3,520 $3,560 $3,600 $3,640 $3,730 3/4-inch meter $3,520 $3,560 $3,600 $3,640 $3,730 1-inch meter $8,780 $8,870 $8,970 $9,070 $9, /2-inch meter $17,540 $17,730 $17,930 $18,130 $18,590 2-inch meter $28,070 $28,370 $28,690 $29,010 $29,750 3-inch meter $56,130 $56,730 $57,360 $58,010 $59,480 4-inch meter $87,690 $88,640 $89,620 $90,630 $92,930 6-inch meter $175,380 $177,270 $179,230 $181,250 $185,860 8-inch meter $315,670 $319,070 $322,590 $326,240 $334, inch meter $508,570 $514,050 $519,720 $525,590 $538, inch meter $754,090 $762,210 $770,620 $779,320 $799,140 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $3,520 $3,560 $3,600 $3,640 $3,730 Duplex (per unit) $3,520 $3,560 $3,600 $3,640 $3,730 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $2,020 $2,040 $2,060 $2,080 $2,140 FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.18b ProjWaterFRCs 5/3/2005

91 Table 2.19 Water FRC Survey of Single Family Residential Connections City CCWD Agency Portion Portion (a) Total Pittsburg, Current $656 $4,460 $5,116 Pittsburg, FY 05/06, Zone III; not SW Hills $4,130 $4,460 $8,590 Antioch $4,560 $4,460 $9,020 Martinez $5,300 $4,460 $9,760 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Alves) $9,820 $4,460 $14,280 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 SW Hills (Smith) $4,130 $4,460 $8,590 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Zones I & II; not SW Hills $7,120 $4,460 $11,580 Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) $10,134 $4,460 $14,594 Note: a. The CCWD Fee for Untreated (Raw) Water Wholesale Municipal Service applies to meters outside the Contra Costa Water District. Charges shown for each City are for a 5/8-inch meter in Service Area A. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl2.19 WaterFRCsurvey 5/3/2005

92 CHAPTER 3 SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES This chapter documents the development and justification in support of the City s Sewer Facility Reserve Charges (FRCs). The Facility Reserve Charges are intended to recover a portion of the City s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) cost, and utility rate payers prior investment in capital facilities that support land development through utility system expansion. The facility reserve charges that are developed meet the regulatory requirements found in Government Code Section et sequentia regarding the establishment of capacity charges. 1 The development of FRCs also meet the policies stated in the City of Pittsburg s General Plan (GP) adopted October Specifically, GP Policy 3-P-11 states that the City should Review and update the City s development impact fee schedule to ensure that new development pays its proportional share of the costs associated with the provision of facilities for police, parks, water, sewer, storm drainage, and schools. Development of sewer facility reserve charges is described in detail and supported with tables and figures in the remainder of this chapter. All tables are included at the end of the chapter. Figures are included within the text in the order of reference. Facility Reserve Charge Regulatory Requirements A facility reserve charge is a charge to pay for public agencies facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed or to pay for new facilities that will be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged (new development or increases to existing service capacity). The terms facility reserve charge and capacity charge are not synonymous with the term connection fee or charge. Section of the State of California Government Code defines a connection fee as a fee for the physical facilities necessary to make a water connection or a sewer connection, including, but not limited to, meters, meter boxes, and pipelines from the structure or project to a water distribution line or sewer main, and that does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of labor and materials for installation of those facilities. Section of the State of California Government Code is included in Appendix A. FRCs are not for the physical connection to a system and do not include costs for operations and maintenance. Current Sewer Facility Reserve Charges The City has separate FRCs for both its water and sewer utilities. The current sewer facility reserve charge is $300 per single family unit and $150 per multiple family unit. The City has not increased its sewer facility reserve charge since Sewer facility reserve charges for nonresidential customers are based upon the estimated volume of wastewater discharge. 1 The terms facility reserve charge, as used by the City, and capacity charge, as defined in the Government Code, are synonymous. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-1

93 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Sewer Facility Reserve Charge Development Methodology Facility reserve charges are based on the premise that new development in the City pay its proportionate share of existing available capacity plus the costs for future system expansion. The FRCs meet the rational nexus criteria generally applied to these types of charges. A rational nexus-based FRC should: Be rationally based on public policy that demonstrates a nexus between new development and the need to expand or build facilities to accommodate it. Not exceed the new development s proportional share of the cost of facilities needed to serve that development, after crediting it for other contributions that it has already made or will make toward that cost. Not be arbitrary or discriminatory in its application to individuals or customer classes. The methodology used to develop the City s sewer facility reserve charges consists of the following steps: Prepare an inventory of system assets and calculate the replacement cost for those assets. Prepare a list of projected capital expenditures for assets that will be built and paid for in the near future that will benefit new development. Determine the capacity of the current system. Determine the amount of new development. Estimate the amount of new debt service (no new debt service is proposed). Estimate the amount of current debt service principal remaining to be paid. These payments are subtracted from the value of current assets since the principal portion already paid is included in either the system inventory asset values and the principal portion remaining to be paid is included in water rates. Estimate the amount of contributed capital. These contributions are subtracted from the value of the assets since the contribution is already included in the system inventory asset values. Calculate the unit cost of capital facilities. Prepare a schedule of facility reserve charges based upon the unit cost of capital facilities. Details of the development of facility reserve charges are described in the following sections. Replacement Cost of Current Assets Sewer system assets included in the facility reserve charge calculation are collection system pipe and manholes. Service lateral pipe between the customer and City s collection system was not included in the inventory as it is the responsibility of individual customers. Equipment, such as vehicles, computers, portable generators This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-2

94 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES and miscellaneous tools, were not included in the inventory since these are operational expenses born by rate payers and new development will pay for replacement of these assets in their sewer rates after connecting to the system and obtaining sewer service. The replacement cost of sewer pipelines and manholes was based on a list of sewer pipeline and manhole costs included the GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit H, Sewer, prepared by Harris & Associates and dated December This exhibit is included in Appendix B. Projected Capital Improvement Program Expenditures Capital Improvement Program (CIP) expenditures for projects that will benefit new development are described in the City s Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. A list of those projects, in inflation adjusted dollars, is shown in Table 3.1. New (Future) Debt Service Principal Payments All of the sewer CIP expenditures for projects that will benefit new development are forecast to be pay-as-you-go (no issuance of new debt). Current Debt Service Principal Payments The City currently has outstanding Sewer Revenue Bonds. This debt funded part of the construction of the existing sewer collection system (pipelines and manholes). The principal portion remaining of the debt is shown in Table 3.2 and in Appendix D. Contributed Capital Contributed capital comes in the form of Redevelopment Agency funds and Assessment District funds. To the extent that these contributed funds paid for construction of the current sewer system and the system constructed with the use of these funds is not at the end of its useful life, these funds are deducted from the replacement value of the system. Redevelopment Agency funds and Assessment District funds are listed in Appendix E. Sewer System Capacity The capacity of the sewer system is defined in terms of Average Dry Weather Wastewater (ADWW) system capacity expressed in million gallons per day (mgd). The City s 2003 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan states that the ADWW capacity in the sewer system is 6.2 mgd. 3 2 The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) promulgates standards for the compilation and reporting of financial data by government agencies. 3 The 2003 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan was developed by MWH and adopted on May 5, This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-3

95 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Sewer Facility Reserve Charge Development The pattern of development in the City during the next 20 years, leading to its ultimate built-out condition, will define the expansion of the sewer system. Those CIP projects that are of benefit to new development were identified in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. Capacity available in the City s sewer system was identified. The City also recognized that new development could be categorized by areas according to CIP projects that benefit new development. A matrix showing the sewer sub-basins with similar benefits from capital facilities and the categories of capital facility projects is shown in Figure 3.1. Figure 3.2 shows the sewer subbasins. Figure 3.1 Sewer Sub-Basins with Similar Benefits from Capital Facilities Projects Capital Facilities Existing Expanded Collection Collection Area System System Sewer Sub-basins SW (a) (a) Sewer Sub-basins DS & SW109 X X All Other Sewer Sub-basins X (b) Note: a. Developer(s) are anticipated to install a new collection system and connect the new system directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor. b. New development in these sub-basins is expected to consist primarily of infill and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. The areas of the City with similar benefits from capital facilities are summarized below. Sewer Sub-basins SW Capital facilities for this area, located west of Oak Hills, will be constructed exclusively by developer(s) for the benefit of new development in that area and are anticipated not to utilize any of the existing system capacity. Therefore, no sewer FRC will be developed or proposed for adoption for this area. Sewer Sub-basins DS and SW109. This area is projected to add the equivalent of 1,525 single family dwelling units to the City s sewer system. The estimated number of new dwelling units is shown in Appendix F. This area will benefit from capital projects designed to add capacity to transmit wastewater from the new development to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District system and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-4

96 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 3-2 Sewer Basins This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-5

97 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES All Other Sewer Sub-basins. New development in these sub-basins is expected to consist primarily of infill and will benefit from capacity in the existing wastewater collection system. A unit cost for construction of the capital facilities for each area of the City was developed and is discussed in the following paragraphs. All units are denominated in dollars for a single family dwelling unit. Sewer Sub-basins SW The sewer collection system in these sub-basins will be constructed by developers and will connect directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor. Sewer Sub-basins DS and SW109 The construction of additional capacity in sewer lines connecting to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor will benefit new development in these sub-basins. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table 3.3. The development of the unit cost involves projecting the total construction costs for the additional capacity in sewer lines connecting to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor and denominating those costs by the number of dwelling units to be connected in those areas. The unit cost for the additional capacity for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is projected to be $1,680. The existing sewer system in the City has capacity available that is of benefit to new development. The unit cost for that capacity is developed as shown in Table 3.2. The development of the unit cost involves projecting the replacement cost of the sewer system, subtracting capital contributions and remaining principal payments of debt service, and denominating those costs by the capacity of the sewer system. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is projected to be $2,650. All Other Sewer Sub-basins As with Sub-basins DS and SW109, all other existing sewer sub-basins in the City have capacity available that is of benefit to new development. The unit cost of capacity for all other sewer sub-basins was developed in the manner as for Subbasins DS and SW109. The unit cost for a single family dwelling during FY 2005/06 is the same as for Sub-basins DS and SW109 ($2,650). A summary of the unit costs is shown in Figure 3.3 and Table 3.4. The unit costs applicable to each area are totaled to produce a facility reserve charge for each area. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-6

98 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 3.3 Sewer FRC for Single Family Residential, FY 2005/06 Sewer Sub-basins SW (a) Sewer Sub-basins DS and SW109 All Other Sewer Sub-basins Current Facility Reserve Charges (b) $300 $300 $300 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges (b) Existing Collection System (c) na $2,650 $2,650 Expanded Collection System na $1,680 na Total Wastewater Facility Reserve Charge $0 $4,330 $2,650 Notes: a. The developer(s) of Sewer Sub-basins SW are anticpated to construct their own collection system and connect directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor. b. In addition to the City Facility Reserve Charges, Delta Diablo Sanitation District charges a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for connections in the Pittsburg area. The charge shown in the Fee Schedule is $4, c. Buy in to existing collection system. Sewer FRC Survey for Single Family Residential The facility reserve charges of other nearby communities was compared to the current and projected charges for the City of Pittsburg. The results of the survey are shown in Table 3.5 and in Figure 3.4. Recommended Facility Reserve Charges The unit cost of capital facilities was used to develop a schedule of facility reserve charges for residential and nonresidential customers. FRCs for nonresidential customers are based on the unit costs with charges for individual connections dependent on the amount of wastewater discharge. FRCs for residential customers are based on the unit costs with a rate structure for single family units, duplexes, and multiple family units. A complete schedule of charges for each area in the City are shown in Table 3.6 for a 5-year period. Recommended Update of FRCs The calculation of FRCs is based, in part, upon projections of construction costs and schedules, projections of the timing and extent of development and projected construction funding costs (debt service). It is recommended that the City revisit and update its facility reserve charges in three years or after receiving significant, material information relevant to the calculation of FRCs, whichever occurs sooner. This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-7

99 CHAPTER 3. SEWER FACILITY RESERVE CHARGES Figure 3.4 Sewer FRC Survey for Single Family Residential Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sub-basins DS and SW109 (DDSD) $4,330 $4,975 Martinez (MVSD) $3,127 $4,499 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 All Other Sewer Sub-basins (DDSD) $2,650 $4,975 Antioch (DDSD) $1,723 $4,225 Pittsburg, Current $300 (DDSD) $4,975 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sewer Sub-basins SW (SW Hills) (DDSD) $4,975 Martinez (CCCSD) $4,971 Oakley (ISD) Concord $3,703 $3,231 Collection Treatment Collection & Treatment $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 Legend: CCCSD = Central Contra Costa Sanitary District; DDSD = Delta Diablo Sanitation District; ISD = Ironhouse Sanitary District; MVSD = Mountain View Sanitary District This is a draft and is not intended to be a final representation of the work done or recommendations made by Brown and Caldwell. It should not be relied upon; consult the final report. 3-8

100 Table 3.1 Sewer CIP Projects Project Costs 2004/ / / / / / / / / /14 Wastewater System CIP Development related- city wide * Highway 4 Trunk Relief Phase One 964,000 1,053,389 Highway 4 Trunk Relief Phase Two 964, ,117,540 West Leland Road 246, ,811 Bailey Road 99, ,180 Total 2,273, ,430, ,117, * FY 2003/04 costs are esclated by the annual > 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% cumulative percent shown. cumulative> 3.0% 6.1% 9.3% 12.6% 15.9% 19.4% 23.0% 26.7% 30.5% 34.4% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.1 CollCIP 5/3/2005

101 Table 3.2 Sewer Collection System Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Sewer Collection System Replacement Cost Pipelines a., b. 81,926,691 84,384,492 86,916,026 89,523,507 92,209,212 94,975,489 97,824, ,759, ,782, ,895, ,102,622 Sewer Collection System Total 81,926,691 84,384,492 86,916,026 89,523,507 92,209,212 94,975,489 97,824, ,759, ,782, ,895, ,102,622 Total Sewer Collection System Structures 81,926,691 84,384,492 86,916,026 89,523,507 92,209,212 94,975,489 97,824, ,759, ,782, ,895, ,102,622 Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Assessment District Funds 1,784,097 1,837,620 1,892,748 1,949,531 2,008,017 2,068,257 2,130,305 2,194,214 2,260,040 2,327,841 2,397,677 Sewer Revenue Bond Remaining Principal 11,175,000 10,785,000 10,380,000 9,955,000 9,505,000 9,030,000 8,530,000 8,000,000 7,445,000 6,865,000 6,255,000 Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt 12,959,097 12,622,620 12,272,748 11,904,531 11,513,017 11,098,257 10,660,305 10,194,214 9,705,040 9,192,841 8,652,677 Wastewater Collection System Valuation 68,967,594 71,761,872 74,643,278 77,618,977 80,696,196 83,877,232 87,164,449 90,565,282 94,077,241 97,702, ,449,945 Average Dry Weather Wastewater System (ADWW) Capacity (gd) c. 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 ADWW Flow Unit Cost ($ per gallon) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Average Single Family Wastewater Flow d Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge $300 $2,546 $2,649 $2,754 $2,863 $2,976 $3,093 $3,214 $3,338 $3,467 $3,600 Facility Reserve Charges Nonresidential Determined by City Engineer Examples (roundup to next $10) gpd factor Estimated Average Wastewater Discharge > $5,100 $5,300 $5,510 $5,730 $5,960 $6,190 $6,430 $6,680 $6,940 $7, $10,190 $10,600 $11,020 $11,460 $11,910 $12,380 $12,860 $13,360 $13,870 $14, $15,280 $15,900 $16,530 $17,190 $17,860 $18,560 $19,290 $20,030 $20,810 $21, $23,150 $24,080 $25,040 $26,040 $27,060 $28,120 $29,220 $30,350 $31,520 $32, $46,300 $48,160 $50,080 $52,070 $54,120 $56,240 $58,430 $60,700 $63,040 $65, $115,750 $120,400 $125,200 $130,160 $135,290 $140,590 $146,080 $151,740 $157,590 $163, $578,730 $601,970 $625,960 $650,780 $676,430 $702,940 $730,370 $758,690 $787,930 $818,150 Residential Single Family $300 $2,550 $2,650 $2,760 $2,870 $2,980 $3,100 $3,220 $3,340 $3,470 $3,600 Duplex $300 $2,550 $2,650 $2,760 $2,870 $2,980 $3,100 $3,220 $3,340 $3,470 $3,600 Triplex, Fourplex, Mobile Homes, Apartments Single Family Average Use d Multiple Family Average Use d Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit (roundup to next $10) $150 $1,970 $2,050 $2,130 $2,220 $2,300 $2,390 $2,490 $2,580 $2,680 $2,790 Notes: a. FY 03/04 value is from the 2003 GASB study, Exh. H. b. Values after FY 03/04 are in escalated dollars. c. Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May 2003, page d. Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May 2003, page 2-6. annual > 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.2 CollCurrFacFRC 5/3/2005

102 Table 3.2 Sewer Collection System Facility Reserve Charge Item Notes FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Sewer Collection System Replacement Cost Pipelines a., b. Sewer Collection System Total Total Sewer Collection System Structures Less Contributions and Outstanding Debt Assessment District Funds Sewer Revenue Bond Remaining Principal Subtotal Contributions & Outstanding Debt Wastewater Collection System Valuation Average Dry Weather Wastewater System (ADWW) Capacity (gd) c. ADWW Flow Unit Cost ($ per gallon) Average Single Family Wastewater Flow d. Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Facility Reserve Charges Nonresidential Determined by City Engineer Examples (roundup to next $10) gpd Estimated Average Wastewater Discharge > Residential Single Family Duplex Triplex, Fourplex, Mobile Homes, Apartments Single Family Average Use d. Multiple Family Average Use d. Average Use Ratio Per Dwelling Unit (roundup to next $10) 113,405, ,807, ,312, ,921, ,639, ,468, ,412, ,474, ,658, ,968, ,405, ,807, ,312, ,921, ,639, ,468, ,412, ,474, ,658, ,968, ,405, ,807, ,312, ,921, ,639, ,468, ,412, ,474, ,658, ,968,717 2,469,607 2,543,695 2,620,006 2,698,606 2,779,564 2,862,951 2,948,840 3,037,305 3,128,424 3,222,277 5,610,000 4,930,000 4,210,000 3,455,000 2,660,000 1,820, , ,079,607 7,473,695 6,830,006 6,153,606 5,439,564 4,682,951 3,883,840 3,037,305 3,128,424 3,222, ,326, ,334, ,482, ,767, ,199, ,785, ,528, ,437, ,530, ,746,440 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 6,200,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $3,737 $3,880 $4,027 $4,179 $4,336 $4,499 $4,667 $4,841 $4,987 $5,136 $7,480 $7,760 $8,060 $8,360 $8,680 $9,000 $9,340 $9,690 $9,980 $10,280 $14,950 $15,520 $16,110 $16,720 $17,350 $18,000 $18,670 $19,370 $19,950 $20,550 $22,430 $23,280 $24,170 $25,080 $26,020 $27,000 $28,010 $29,050 $29,920 $30,820 $33,980 $35,270 $36,610 $37,990 $39,420 $40,900 $42,430 $44,020 $45,340 $46,700 $67,960 $70,540 $73,220 $75,980 $78,840 $81,800 $84,860 $88,030 $90,670 $93,390 $169,890 $176,350 $183,040 $189,950 $197,100 $204,500 $212,150 $220,070 $226,670 $233,470 $849,410 $881,730 $915,180 $949,750 $985,490 $1,022,470 $1,060,720 $1,100,310 $1,133,320 $1,167,320 $3,740 $3,880 $4,030 $4,180 $4,340 $4,500 $4,670 $4,850 $4,990 $5,140 $3,740 $3,880 $4,030 $4,180 $4,340 $4,500 $4,670 $4,850 $4,990 $5, $2,890 $3,000 $3,120 $3,230 $3,360 $3,480 $3,610 $3,750 $3,860 $3,970 Notes: a. FY 03/04 value is from the 2003 GASB study, Exh. H. b. Values after FY 03/04 are in escalated dollars. c. Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May 2003, page d. Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May 2003, page 2-6. annual > 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.2 CollCurrFacFRC 5/3/2005

103 Table 3.3 Collection System Capacity Expansion CIP Item Collection System Capacity Expansion Costs $2,547,920 Number of Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (a) 1,525 Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Charge Calculated $1,671 Round up to next $10 $1,680 Facility Reserve Charges Nonresidential Determined by City Engineer Examples gpd factor Average Wastewater Discharge > $3, $6, $10, $15, $30, $75, $379,800 Residential Single Family $1,680 Duplex (per unit) $1,680 Triplex, Fourplex, Mobile Homes, Apartments Single Family Average Use 220 Multiple Family Average Use 170 Average Use Ratio 0.77 Per Dwelling Unit (roundup to next $10) $1,300 Notes: a. The number of additional units is based on the difference between existing land use and ultimate land use. Land use estimates are from Appendix A (Existing) and Appendix B (Ultimate) shown in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May Calculation of the number of additional units is shown in Appendix F of this study. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.3 CollExpFRC 5/3/2005

104 Table 3.4 FY 2005/06 Sewer FRC for Single Family Residential Sewer Facility Reserve Charge Sewer Sub-basins SW (b) Sewer Sub-basins DS and SW109 All Other Sewer Sub-basins Current Facility Reserve Charges (a) na $300 $300 Proposed Facility Reserve Charges (a) Existing Collection System na $2,650 $2,650 Expanded Collection System na $1,680 na Total Wastewater Facility Reserve Charge $0 $4,330 $2,650 Note: a. Delta Diablo Sanitation District charges a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for connections in the Pittsburg area. The charge shown in the Fee Schedule is $4, b. The developer(s) of Sewer Sub-basins SW will construct their own collection system and connect directly to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District interceptor.

105 Table 3.5 Sewer FRC Survey of Single Family Residential Connections City Collection Treatment Collection & Treatment Total Concord $3,703 $3,703 Oakley (ISD) $736 $3,231 $3,967 Martinez (CCCSD) $4,971 $4,971 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sewer Sub-basins SW (SW Hills) (DDSD) $0 $4,975 $4,975 Pittsburg, Current (DDSD) Antioch (DDSD) $300 $4,975 $5,275 $1,723 $4,225 $5,948 Pittsburg, FY 05/06 All Other Sewer Sub-basins (DDSD) Martinez (MVSD) Pittsburg, FY 05/06 Sub-basins DS and SW109 (DDSD) $2,650 $4,975 $7,625 $3,127 $4,499 $7,626 $4,330 $4,975 $9,305 Legend: CCCSD = Central Contra Costa Sanitary District; DDSD = Delta Diablo Sanitation District; ISD = Ironhouse Sanitary District; MVSD = Mountain View Sanitary District FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.5 SewerFRCsurvey 5/3/2005

106 Table 3.6 Recommended Sewer Facility Reserve Charges Facility Reserve Charges FY FY FY FY FY Sub-basins DS and SW109 Nonresidential ($ per connection) Average Wastewater Discharge (gpd) 440 $8,650 $8,860 $9,080 $9,310 $9, $17,290 $17,710 $18,150 $18,600 $19,070 1,320 $25,930 $26,560 $27,220 $27,890 $28,590 2,000 $39,280 $40,240 $41,240 $42,260 $43,320 4,000 $78,550 $80,470 $82,460 $84,510 $86,630 10,000 $196,360 $201,160 $206,120 $211,250 $216,550 50,000 $981,770 $1,005,760 $1,030,580 $1,056,230 $1,082,740 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $4,330 $4,440 $4,550 $4,660 $4,780 Duplex (per unit) $4,330 $4,440 $4,550 $4,660 $4,780 Multiple Family Per Dwelling Unit $3,350 $3,430 $3,520 $3,600 $3,690 Other Sub-basins Nonresidential ($ per connection) Average Wastewater Discharge (gpd) 440 $5,300 $5,510 $5,730 $5,960 $6, $10,600 $11,020 $11,460 $11,910 $12,380 1,320 $15,900 $16,530 $17,190 $17,860 $18,560 2,000 $24,080 $25,040 $26,040 $27,060 $28,120 4,000 $48,160 $50,080 $52,070 $54,120 $56,240 10,000 $120,400 $125,200 $130,160 $135,290 $140,590 50,000 $601,970 $625,960 $650,780 $676,430 $702,940 Residential ($ per unit) Single Family Dwelling $2,650 $2,760 $2,870 $2,980 $3,100 Duplex (per unit) $2,650 $2,760 $2,870 $2,980 $3,100 Multiple Family (a) Per Dwelling Unit $2,050 $2,130 $2,220 $2,300 $2,390 Notes: a. Charges for Multiple Family Dwelling Units are based on unit flow factors shown in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, May 2003, page 2-6. FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; Tbl3.6 ProjSewerFRCs 5/3/2005

107 Appendix A Government Code Sections

108 CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law which prescribes an amount or otherwise limits the amount of a fee or charge which may be levied by a city, county, or city and county, a city, county, or city and county shall have the authority to levy any fee or charge in connection with the operation of an aerial tramway within its jurisdiction. (b) If any person disputes whether a fee or charge levied pursuant to subdivision (a) is reasonable, the auditor, or if there is no auditor, the fiscal officer, of the city, county, or city and county shall, upon request of the legislative body of the city, county, or city and county, conduct a study and determine whether the fee or charge is reasonable (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency imposes fees for water connections or sewer connections, or imposes capacity charges, those fees or charges shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee or charge imposed in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approved by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue. (b) As used in this section: (1) "Sewer connection" means the connection of a structure or project to a public sewer system. (2) "Water connection" means the connection of a structure or project to a public water system, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section of the Health and Safety Code. (3) "Capacity charge" means a charge for facilities in existence at the time a charge is imposed or charges for new facilities to be constructed in the future that are of benefit to the person or property being charged. (4) "Local agency" means a local agency as defined in Section (5) "Fee" means a fee for the physical facilities necessary to make a water connection or sewer connection, including, but not limited to, meters, meter boxes, and pipelines from the structure or project to a water distribution line or sewer main, and that does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of labor and materials for installation of those facilities. (c) A local agency receiving payment of a charge as specified in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) shall deposit it in a separate capital facilities fund with other charges received, and account for the charges in a manner to avoid any commingling with other moneys of the local agency, except for investments, and shall expend those charges solely for the purposes for which the charges were collected. Any interest income earned from the investment of moneys in the capital facilities fund shall be deposited in that fund.

109 CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (d) For a fund established pursuant to subdivision (c), a local agency shall make available to the public, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the following information for that fiscal year: (1) A description of the charges deposited in the fund. (2) The beginning and ending balance of the fund and the interest earned from investment of moneys in the fund. (3) The amount of charges collected in that fiscal year. (4) An identification of all of the following: (A) Each public improvement on which charges were expended and the amount of the expenditure for each improvement, including the percentage of the total cost of the public improvement that was funded with those charges if more than one source of funding was used. (B) Each public improvement on which charges were expended that was completed during that fiscal year. (C) Each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the following fiscal year. (5) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the capital facilities fund. The information provided, in the case of an interfund transfer, shall identify the public improvements on which the transferred moneys are, or will be, expended. The information, in the case of an interfund loan, shall include the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the fund will receive on the loan. (e) The information required pursuant to subdivision (d) may be included in the local agency's annual financial report. (f) The provisions of subdivisions (c) and (d) shall not apply to any of the following: (1) Moneys received to construct public facilities pursuant to a contract between a local agency and a person or entity, including, but not limited to, a reimbursement agreement pursuant to Section (2) Charges that are used to pay existing debt service or which are subject to a contract with a trustee for bondholders that requires a different accounting of the charges, or charges that are used to reimburse the local agency or to reimburse a person or entity who advanced funds under a reimbursement agreement or contract for facilities in existence at the time the charges are collected. (3) Charges collected on or before December 31, (g) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the ordinance, resolution, or motion imposing a fee or capacity charge subject to this section shall be brought pursuant to Section (h) Fees and charges subject to this section are not subject to the provisions of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000), but are subject to the provisions of Sections 66016, 66022, and (i) The provisions of subdivisions (c) and (d) shall only apply to capacity charges levied pursuant to this section.

110 CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use permits; building inspections; building permits; filing and processing applications and petitions filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting preliminary proceedings or proceedings under the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3 (commencing with Section 56000) of Title 5; the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7; or planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 65100) of Division 1 of Title 7 or under any other authority; those fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approved by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue. (b) The fees charged pursuant to subdivision (a) may include the costs reasonably necessary to prepare and revise the plans and policies that a local agency is required to adopt before it can make any necessary findings and determinations. (c) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the ordinance, resolution, or motion authorizing the charge of a fee subject to this section shall be brought pursuant to Section

111 Appendix B Water System Pipelines as of 2003 Const. Date Current Age (Years) 4" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 6" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 8" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) $ $ $ $ $ ,678 $ $ $ ,140 $ $ $ ,680 $ $ ,060 $ ,640 $ $ ,900 $ ,780 $ $ ,260 $ ,180 $ $ ,400 $ ,120 $ $ $ ,960 $ $ $ ,060 $ $ ,380 $ ,220 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,500 $ $ ,900 $ ,200 $ $ $ ,960 $ $ $ ,943 $ $ $ ,405 $ $ $ $ Totals , ,466 Estimated Useful Life: 65 years Current Year: 2003 Const. Date Current Age (Years) 4" PVC Actual Installation Cost 6" PVC Actual Installation Cost 8" PVC Actual Installation Cost $0 - $0 - $0 Totals Grand Totals Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 4" PVC 0 6" PVC 0 8" PVC

112 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals 10" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 12" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 16" PVC Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,540 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,500 $ ,820 $ $ $ ,500 $ $ ,680 $ ,100 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,540 2,800 7,420 Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 10" PVC Actual Installation Cost 12" PVC Actual Installation Cost 16" PVC Actual Installation Cost - $0 - $0 - $ Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 10" PVC 0 12" PVC 0 16" PVC

113 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals 12" DIP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 16" DIP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 20" DIP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) - $ $ ,797 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,360 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,689 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,120 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,700 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,000 6,300 54,246 Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 12" DIP Actual Installation Cost 16" DIP Actual Installation Cost 20" DIP Actual Installation Cost - $0 - $0 1,340 $250, ,340 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 12" DIP 0 16" DIP 12,000 20" DIP

114 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals 2" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 4" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 6" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 560 $ $ ,237 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,400 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,777 Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 2" ACP Actual Installation Cost 4" ACP Actual Installation Cost 6" ACP Actual Installation Cost - $0 - $0 - $ Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 2" ACP 0 4" ACP 0 6" ACP

115 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals 8" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 10" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 12" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 420 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,800 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,216 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , ,216 Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 8" ACP Actual Installation Cost 10" ACP Actual Installation Cost 12" ACP Actual Installation Cost - $0 - $0 - $ Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 8" ACP 0 10" ACP 0 12" ACP

116 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals 14" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 18" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 24" ACP Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR CCI) 6,300 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,300 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 14" ACP Actual Installation Cost 18" ACP Actual Installation Cost 24" ACP Actual Installation Cost - $0 - $0 - $ Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 14" ACP 0 18" ACP 0 24" ACP

117 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals Estimated Original Unit Cost (Based on ENR 30" ACP CCI) - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,245 Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals 30" ACP Actual Installation Cost - $0-1, ,585 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December Portions of the water system pipelines that service the SW Hills were identified by the City and are listed below: 0 30" ACP

118 Appendix B Water System Pipelines Const. Date Current Age (Years) Totals Current Replacement Cost Estimated Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation 2003 Unit Costs for Water Assets: Current Net Book Value Description Unit Cost Unit $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $ lf $3,696,657 $2,146, $33,025 $561,429 $1,585,211 4"PVC $204,716 $133, $2,048 $32,762 $100,333 6"PVC $3,900,820 $2,563, $39,444 $591,666 $1,972,221 8"PVC $1,058,960 $721, $11,107 $155,493 $566,439 10"PVC $1,921,780 $1,336, $20,558 $267,259 $1,069,037 12"PVC $9,673,257 $6,470, $99,552 $1,194,626 $5,276,265 16"PVC $860,160 $629, $9,679 $106,473 $522,684 12"DIP $307,440 $237, $3,655 $36,553 $201,040 16"DIP $626,080 $493, $7,598 $68,378 $425,466 20"DIP $623,700 $505, $7,775 $62,198 $443,157 2"ACP $683,200 $570, $8,782 $61,477 $509,380 4"ACP $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0 6"ACP $9,644,640 $8,252, $126,961 $634,805 $7,617,660 8"ACP $3,583,440 $3,148, $48,438 $193,753 $2,954,735 10"ACP $2,209,200 $2,049, $31,531 $94,594 $1,954,941 12"ACP $7,128,946 $6,631, $102,029 $204,059 $6,427,853 14"ACP $3,788,370 $3,682, $56,649 $56,649 $3,625,515 18"ACP $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $0 24"ACP $49,911,366 $39,574,111 $4,322,173 $35,251,938 30"ACP Estimated Useful Life: Current Year: Const. Current Age Date (Years) Totals Grand Totals Current Replacement Cost Actual Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value $250,078 $250,078 $3,847 $0 $250,078 $250,078 $250,078 $0 $250,078 $50,161,444 $39,824,189 $4,322,173 $35,502,016 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit K, Water Pipe, Harris & Associates, December 2003.

119 Appendix B Water System Structures as of 2003 Appraisal Number Structure Descriptiopn/Location Const. Date Current Age (Years) Current Replacement Value Construction Date Multiplier (Based on ENR CCI) Estimated Original Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value MG Reservoir Stoneman $1,122, $748,667 $11,518 $172,769 $575, MG Finished Water Reservoir Water Treatment Plant $3,470, $3,133,409 $48,206 $192,825 $2,940, Generator Water Treatment Plant $731, $511,824 $7,874 $102,365 $409, Control/Chemical Feed Building Water Treatment Plant $3,912, $2,736,622 $42,102 $547,324 $2,189, Bulk Chemical Storage Tanks Water Treatment Plant $863, $603,811 $9,289 $120,762 $483, Booster Pumps Water Treatment Plant $949, $664,315 $10,220 $132,863 $531, Fluoride Feed Room Water Treatment Plant $25, $17,200 $265 $3,705 $13, MG Tank Water Treatment Plant - Olympia Drive $871, $786,594 $12,101 $48,406 $738, Pump Station Oak Hills Bridgeview $1,101, $787,868 $12,121 $145,453 $642, MG Tank Oak Hills Bridgeview $1,943, $1,389,834 $21,382 $256,585 $1,133, Well Ball Park - Civic & Railroad $65, $53,401 $822 $6,572 $46, Well Rossmoor $63, $51,751 $796 $6,369 $45, In-Ground Tank Oak Hills - Shadybrook Ct $2,198, $1,985,121 $30,540 $122,161 $1,862, Booster Station Oak Hills - Sunpeak Dr $1,262, $1,139,629 $17,533 $70,131 $1,069, Steel Tank Highlands Ranch - Ventura Dr $1,086, $1,007,985 $15,507 $46,522 $961, Booster Station Highlands Ranch - Ventura Dr $1,086, $1,007,994 $15,508 $46,523 $961,472 Totals $20,754,490 $16,626,025 $2,021,336 $14,604,689 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit L, Water Distribution System Network Structures Since 1986, Harris & Associates, December FacResChg draftvi ver15c.xls; GASB34exhL 5/3/2005

120 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 50 < ACP and RCP Estimated Useful Life 2003 < Current Year Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Current Age 6" ACP Length (Feet) 8" ACP Length (Feet) 10" ACP Length (Feet) 12" ACP Length (Feet) ,966 $ ,905 $ $ $ ,040 $ ,771 $ $ ,421 $ ,073 $ ,539 $ ,041 $ ,842 $ ,223 $ ,760 $ $ ,911 $ ,876 $ ,940 $ $ ,217 $ ,264 $ ,808 $ ,328 $ ,356 $ ,881 $ ,930 $ $ ,446 $ ,942 $ ,582 $ $ ,128 $ ,508 $ $ $ $ Totals 190,773 73,197 6,604 18, < ABS & Manhole Estimated Useful Life 2003 < Current Year Construction Date (Decade) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Current Age 10" ABS Length (Feet) Manholes $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1, $ $ 2, $ $ 2, $ $ 3, Totals 575 2,151 Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

121 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 65 < VCPC Estimated Useful Life 2003 < Current Year Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Current Age 6" VCPC Length (Feet) 8" VCPC Length (Feet) 10" VCPC Length (Feet) 12" VCPC Length (Feet) ,798 $ $ $ $ ,445 $ ,860 $ $ $ ,887 $ ,720 $ ,376 $ $ ,321 $ ,501 $ $ $ ,662 $ ,593 $ $ $ ,351 $ ,319 $ ,077 $ ,012 $ ,369 $ ,201 $ ,184 $ $ ,323 $ ,477 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Totals 69,064 23,595 8,727 2,871 Construction Date (Decade) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 75 < VCPG and PVC Estimated Useful Life 2003 < Current Year Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* Current Age 6" VCPG Length (Feet) 8" VCPG Length (Feet) 10" VCPG Length (Feet) 12" VCPG Length (Feet) ,044 $ $ $ $ ,192 $ ,118 $ $ $ ,380 $ ,235 $ $ $ ,326 $ ,503 $ $ $ ,301 $ $ $ $ ,691 $ ,000 $ ,842 $ ,640 $ ,654 $ ,924 $ $ $ ,916 $ $ $ $ ,032 $ $ $ $ Totals 78,536 14,180 5,226 4,651 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit H, Sewer, Harris & Associates, December * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

122 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals 15" ACP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 18" ACP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR 21" ACP Length CCI)* (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 24" ACP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 67 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,448 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,239 $ $ $ $ ,246 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,583 9, Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

123 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals 15" VCPC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 21" VCPC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 24" VCPC Length (Feet) 193 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,167 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,611 $ ,619 $ $ ,005 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,406 4, Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR Left Intentionally CCI)* Blank Left Intentionally Blank Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals 24" VCPG Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 6" PVC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 8" PVC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 10" PVC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 9 $ $ $ $ $ ,027 $ ,403 $ $ $ ,054 $ ,806 $ $ $ ,381 $ ,232 $ $ $ $ ,058 $ $ $ ,595 $ ,748 $ $ $ ,768 $ ,136 $ $ $ $ ,908 $ $ $ $ $ $ ,031 30, Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit H, Sewer, Harris & Associates, December * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

124 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals 36" ACP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 18" RCP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 24" RCP Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 70 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

125 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals 12" PVC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 15" PVC Length (Feet) Estimated Original Unit Cost (based on ENR CCI)* 61 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ,354 1,435 Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank Left Intentionally Blank 574,100 Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit H, Sewer, Harris & Associates, December * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

126 Appendix B Wastewater System as of Sewer Pipeline Unit Costs: Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Current Replacement Value Estimated Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value Pipe Diameter Unit Cost Unit $ 1,039,287 $ 22,267 $ 445 $ 22,267 $ - 6" $ LF $ 3,149,000 $ 70,680 $ 1,414 $ 70,680 $ - 8" $ LF $ 6,296,056 $ 253,032 $ 5,061 $ 253,032 $ - 10" $ LF $ 4,234,171 $ 348,090 $ 6,962 $ 334,166 $ 13,924 12" $ LF $ 2,695,581 $ 344,167 $ 6,883 $ 261,567 $ 82,600 15" $ LF $ 14,082,532 $ 4,253,318 $ 85,066 $ 2,381,858 $ 1,871,460 18" $ LF $ 5,418,491 $ 3,252,539 $ 65,051 $ 1,170,914 $ 2,081,625 21" $ LF $ 2,499,926 $ 2,006,462 $ 40,129 $ 321,034 $ 1,685,428 24" $ LF $ 524,901 $ 505,034 $ 10,101 $ 30,302 $ 474,732 36" $ LF $39,939,945 $11,055,589 $4,845,820 $6,209,769 Manholes $ 3,500 ea Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Current Replacement Value Estimated Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value $ 198,134 $ 4,246 $ 71 $ 4,246 $ - $ 600,005 $ 13,472 $ 225 $ 13,472 $ - $ 1,199,879 $ 48,237 $ 804 $ 46,630 $ 1,608 $ 806,847 $ 66,352 $ 1,106 $ 53,082 $ 13,270 $ 513,743 $ 65,615 $ 1,094 $ 41,556 $ 24,059 $ 2,683,536 $ 810,764 $ 13,513 $ 378,357 $ 432,407 $ 1,032,577 $ 620,022 $ 10,334 $ 186,007 $ 434,015 $ 476,453 $ 382,527 $ 6,375 $ 51,004 $ 331,523 $ 100,126 $ 96,367 $ 1,606 $ 4,818 $ 91,548 $7,611,300 $2,107,602 $779,170 $1,328,432 * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

127 Appendix B Wastewater System as of 2003 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Current Replacement Value Estimated Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value $ 403,087 $ 8,639 $ 133 $ 8,639 $ - $ 1,220,688 $ 27,407 $ 422 $ 27,407 $ - $ 2,440,983 $ 98,132 $ 1,510 $ 87,564 $ 10,568 $ 1,641,258 $ 134,971 $ 2,076 $ 99,671 $ 35,300 $ 1,045,333 $ 133,509 $ 2,054 $ 78,051 $ 55,458 $ 5,459,162 $ 1,649,351 $ 25,375 $ 710,490 $ 938,861 $ 2,100,548 $ 1,261,296 $ 19,405 $ 349,282 $ 912,014 $ 969,289 $ 778,208 $ 11,972 $ 95,779 $ 682,429 $ 203,388 $ 195,753 $ 3,012 $ 9,035 $ 186,718 $15,483,736 $4,287,266 $1,465,918 $2,821,348 Construction Date (Decade) Current Age Totals Current Replacement Value Estimated Historical Cost Annual Depreciation Accumulated Depreciation Current Net Book Value $ 491,515 $ 10,534 $ 140 $ 10,534 $ - $ 1,489,344 $ 33,439 $ 446 $ 30,318 $ 3,121 $ 2,977,920 $ 119,718 $ 1,596 $ 92,582 $ 27,136 $ 2,002,846 $ 164,706 $ 2,196 $ 105,412 $ 59,294 $ 1,275,212 $ 162,869 $ 2,172 $ 82,520 $ 80,349 $ 6,660,767 $ 2,012,386 $ 26,832 $ 751,291 $ 1,261,095 $ 2,563,023 $ 1,538,994 $ 20,520 $ 369,359 $ 1,169,636 $ 1,182,604 $ 949,471 $ 12,660 $ 101,277 $ 848,194 $ 248,479 $ 239,151 $ 3,189 $ 9,566 $ 229,585 $18,891,710 $5,231,269 $1,552,859 $3,678,410 $81,926,691 $22,681,726 $8,643,768 $14,037,958 < Grand Totals Source: GASB 34 Compliance Report, Exhibit H, Sewer, Harris & Associates, December * Unit cost shown is the average unit cost for that decade

128 Appendix C Water Treatment Facilities' Costs Developed by Brown and Caldwell

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202 227 West Trade Street Phone 704 373 1199 www.raftelis.com Suite 1400 Fax 704 373 1113 Charlotte, NC 28202 March 13, 2018 Ms. Courtney Driver Utilities Director Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities PO

More information

WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES REPORT PROPOSED

WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES REPORT PROPOSED WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES REPORT PROPOSED B&V PROJECT NO. 197551 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2015. All rights reserved. PREPARED FOR Town of Clayton, North Carolina 4 MAY 2018 Table of Contents

More information

CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT. Treated and Untreated Water Rate Study

CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT. Treated and Untreated Water Rate Study CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT Treated and Untreated Water Rate Study Final Report / December 2018 December 21, 2018 Mr. Jerry Brown General Manager Contra Costa Water District 1331 Concord Avenue Concord,

More information

COMMISSION ADOPTED POLICY Revenue Policy

COMMISSION ADOPTED POLICY Revenue Policy Adopted: May 23, 2017 Revised: N/A Page 1 of 7 1.0 Purpose and Need The purpose of this revenue policy is to ensure that there is sufficient revenue to support direct and indirect operating, capital, reserves

More information

Update to Facility Capacity Charges Methodology and Schedule. A study for El Dorado Irrigation District. prepared by. Bartle Wells Associates

Update to Facility Capacity Charges Methodology and Schedule. A study for El Dorado Irrigation District. prepared by. Bartle Wells Associates APPENDIX A Update to Facility Capacity Charges Methodology and Schedule A study for El Dorado Irrigation District prepared by Bartle Wells Associates Principal Consultants Doug Dove, President Catherine

More information

March 11, Mr. Dan Brown Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District PO Box 308 Roanoke Rapids, NC Dear Mr.

March 11, Mr. Dan Brown Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District PO Box 308 Roanoke Rapids, NC Dear Mr. March 11, 2019 Mr. Dan Brown Chief Executive Officer Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District PO Box 308 Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 Dear Mr. Brown, Raftelis has completed an evaluation to develop cost-justified

More information

Final Report Rate, Charge, and Cost of Service Study. For: Parker Water and Sanitation District. December 2014

Final Report Rate, Charge, and Cost of Service Study. For: Parker Water and Sanitation District. December 2014 Final Report Rate, Charge, and Cost of Service Study For: December December 29, Steve Hellman Chief Financial Officer 18100 E. Woodman Drive Parker, Colorado 80134 On behalf of MWH Global, I d like to

More information

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN This chapter presents 6-, 10-, and 20-year Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) in accordance with the requirements of WAC 26-290. Water system capital improvements

More information

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202 227 West Trade Street Phone 704 373 1199 www.raftelis.com Suite 1400 Fax 704 373 1113 Charlotte, NC 28202 March 12, 2018 Mr. Don Chamblee Public Works Director Lincoln County 115 W Main St Lincolnton,

More information

City of Stockton California

City of Stockton California Report to: City of Stockton California Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP) Surface Water Supply Fee (SWSF) June 2009 Prepared by HDR, Inc. June 8, 2008 Ms. Melissa Price City of Stockton Municipal Utilities

More information

April 19, Dear Ms. Haskins

April 19, Dear Ms. Haskins 227 West Trade Street Phone 704 373 1199 www.raftelis.com Suite 1400 Fax 704 373 1113 Charlotte, NC 28202 April 19, 2018 Ms. Rhonda Haskins, CPA Director of Financial Planning Fayetteville Public Works

More information

FINAL REPORT. Lake Arrowhead Community Services District Water and Sewer Capacity Fees January \

FINAL REPORT. Lake Arrowhead Community Services District Water and Sewer Capacity Fees January \ FINAL REPORT Lake Arrowhead Community Services District Water and Sewer Capacity Fees January 2016 24148.00100\20807156.1 January 4, 2016 Ms. Catherine Cerri Finance Manager Lake Arrowhead Community Services

More information

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY DRAFT WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY MCKINLEYVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APRIL 4, 2011 OVERVIEW McKinleyville Community Services District (the District) retained Willdan to prepare a capacity

More information

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY B&V PROJECT NO. 176244.0100 PREPARED FOR Camrosa Water District MARCH 20, 2013 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2011. All rights reserved. Camrosa Water District WATER AND

More information

F I N A L Water and Wastewater Charges Study

F I N A L Water and Wastewater Charges Study F I N A L Water and Wastewater Charges Study Prepared for San Lorenzo Valley Water District, California March 2013 871 Coronado Center Drive, Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada 89052 This Page Intentionally Blank.

More information

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY

WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY DRAFT WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY FEE STUDY MCKINLEYVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAY 5, 2011 OVERVIEW McKinleyville Community Services District (the District) retained Willdan to prepare a capacity fee

More information

Water, Wastewater and Irrigation Impact Fee Study

Water, Wastewater and Irrigation Impact Fee Study Water, Wastewater and Irrigation Impact Fee Study City of Cape Coral, Florida Prepared by duncan associates October 2006 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 Background... 4 Legal

More information

Special Meeting of the Infrastructure & Franchise Committee

Special Meeting of the Infrastructure & Franchise Committee COMMITTEE MEMBERS Edi E. Birsan, Chair Laura M. Hoffmeister, Member Civic Center 1950 Parkside Drive Concord, CA 94519 www.cityofconcord.org Special Meeting of the Infrastructure & Franchise Committee

More information

DRAFT REPORT City of Tracy Water Rate Study August 2017

DRAFT REPORT City of Tracy Water Rate Study August 2017 DRAFT REPORT City of Tracy Water Rate Study August 2017 August 23, 2017 Mr. Kuldeep Sharma Director of Utilities City of Tracy 3900 Holly Drive Tracy, CA 95304 Subject: Comprehensive Water Rate Study Draft

More information

SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study

SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study Draft-Final Report / July 17, 2018 5619 DTC Parkway Suite 850 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Phone 303.305.1135

More information

DRAFT FINAL REPORT. City of Kalispell. Stormwater Impact Fee Study

DRAFT FINAL REPORT. City of Kalispell. Stormwater Impact Fee Study DRAFT FINAL REPORT City of Kalispell Stormwater Impact Fee Study April 2017 April 13, 2017 Ms. Susie Turner, P.E. Public Works Director City of Kalispell 201 First Avenue East Kalispell, MT 59901 Subject:

More information

2010 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

2010 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN 2010 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN Prepared for: City of Georgetown P.O. Box 409 Georgetown, Texas 78627-0409 Prepared by: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee

More information

ckly STAFF REPORT Trish Rhay, Assistant Director of Public Works Caitlin Sims, Senior Management Analyst

ckly STAFF REPORT Trish Rhay, Assistant Director of Public Works Caitlin Sims, Senior Management Analyst Subject: Distribution of Water Rates Public Notice Phase 1: Five-Year Rate Review and Adjustment to Address Revenue Phase 2: WEP Unit Capital Charge and Cost of Service Study. With that direction, staff

More information

Contents 8/31/2017 DRAFT REGIONAL IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS

Contents 8/31/2017 DRAFT REGIONAL IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS Contents Executive Summary... 2 Introduction... 2 Impact Fee Facilities Plan and Impact Fee Analysis... 2 Level of Service... 2 Excess Capacity Used by New Development... 3 Building Facilities for New

More information

This is the title of the proposed project. A CIP contract or project number will be assigned to the projects as funding is established.

This is the title of the proposed project. A CIP contract or project number will be assigned to the projects as funding is established. WATER PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The CIP includes a general list of projects scheduled during each of the five years of the program, followed by detailed project sheets arranged by project category,

More information

Overview of Local Facilities. Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee

Overview of Local Facilities. Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee Overview of Local Facilities Integrated Resource Planning Advisory Committee City of Henderson Utility Services System Overview 2 CITY OF HENDERSON Department of Utility Services The Department of Utility

More information

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT

BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT Sewer Rate Study Report / Aug 26, 2017 445 S. Figueroa Street Suite 2270 Los Angeles, 90071 Phone 213.262.9304 Fax 626.583.1411 www.raftelis.com Aug 26, 2017 Mr. Elmer Alex Principal

More information

2014 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF UNIVERSAL CITY

2014 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF UNIVERSAL CITY 204 UPDATE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF UNIVERSAL CITY Prepared by: Impact Fee Advisory Committee City of Universal City, Texas Assisted by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 440 West Gate Blvd,

More information

Water Rate Study 2015

Water Rate Study 2015 Water Rate Study 2015 Final Report May 20, 2015 BART LE WELLS ASSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Consultants 1889 Alcatraz Avenue Berkeley, California 94703 www.bartlewells.com Tel: 510/653-3399 TABLE

More information

Public Utilities Director. Public Utilities Assistant Director. Administrative Analyst. Laboratory. Laboratory Manager. Sr. Utilities.

Public Utilities Director. Public Utilities Assistant Director. Administrative Analyst. Laboratory. Laboratory Manager. Sr. Utilities. Director Administrative Support Manager Assistant Director Controller Senior Staff Assistant Personnel/ Payroll Technician (2) Administrative Analyst Accountant Storeskeeper Accounting Tech Infrastructure

More information

Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water Service Rates, Fees and Charges. How to Submit a Protest

Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water Service Rates, Fees and Charges. How to Submit a Protest 220 Nellen Ave. Corte Madera, CA 94925 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Water Service Rates, Fees and Charges The Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) Board of Directors will hold a public hearing

More information

TASK IV: ANALYSIS OF MILLBROOK SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM CONSUMPTION CHARGES AND SEWER CAPITAL ASSESSMENTS

TASK IV: ANALYSIS OF MILLBROOK SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM CONSUMPTION CHARGES AND SEWER CAPITAL ASSESSMENTS TASK IV: ANALYSIS OF MILLBROOK SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM CONSUMPTION CHARGES AND SEWER CAPITAL ASSESSMENTS PREPARED FOR: VILLAGE OF MILLBROOK, NY PREPARED BY: This document was prepared with funds provided

More information

Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Sewer Capital Facilities Charge March 2015

Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Sewer Capital Facilities Charge March 2015 FINAL REPORT Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District Sewer Capital Facilities Charge March 2015 March 23, 2015 Ms. Susan M. McGuire, CPA Administrative Services Manager Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District

More information

DRINKING WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITY PLAN AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (HAL Project No.: 360.07.300) OCTOBER 2017 CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS DRINKING WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITY PLAN AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (HAL

More information

Utilities Enterprise Fund Summary

Utilities Enterprise Fund Summary Summary Original Adjusted % Change % Change Sources of Funding FY 13 FY 14 FY 14 FY 15 Orig. FY 14 Adj. FY 14 MES Reimbursement $27,192 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 0.00% 0.00% Water Usage 3,450,147 3,933,738

More information

Water and Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Maximum Impact Fees Study. San Antonio Water System

Water and Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Maximum Impact Fees Study. San Antonio Water System Carollo Engineers, Inc. 114785 Preston Rd., Ste. 950 Dallas, TX 75254 carollo.com Water and Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Maximum Impact Fees Study DRAFT

More information

City Council Public Input Session Water / Sewer Rate Study. March 19, 2014

City Council Public Input Session Water / Sewer Rate Study. March 19, 2014 City Council Public Input Session Water / Sewer Rate Study March 19, 2014 Overview of Meeting Introduction of the Study Overview of Water and Sewer Systems FY14 Rate Study Work Accomplished and Presentations

More information

City of Moline Water Infrastructure Overview

City of Moline Water Infrastructure Overview City of Moline Water Infrastructure Overview January 2012 Moline s Water Supply System Delivers: Public Health Protection Fire Protection Support for the Local Economy Quality of Life Moline s Water Supply

More information

AGENDA DOCKET FORM. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive update on the rate structure analysis and provide direction.

AGENDA DOCKET FORM. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive update on the rate structure analysis and provide direction. AGENDA DOCKET FORM SUBJECT: RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS UPDATE Agenda Item No. Revised 11 Meeting Date: July 11, 2018 Resolution: No SUMMARY: Contra Costa Water District (District) is conducting a comprehensive

More information

City of Stockton. Final Report Delta Water Supply Project: Water Rate and Financing Study. HDR Engineering, Inc. June 2009.

City of Stockton. Final Report Delta Water Supply Project: Water Rate and Financing Study. HDR Engineering, Inc. June 2009. City of Stockton Final Report Delta Water Supply Project: Water Rate and Financing Study June 2009 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. June 8, 2009 Ms. Melissa Price Program Manager III City of Stockton

More information

County Service Area 16 Shandon Water Rate Analysis

County Service Area 16 Shandon Water Rate Analysis County Service Area 16 Shandon Water Rate Analysis Prepared By: County Public Works December 2014 December 2014 Water Rate Analysis County Service Area (CSA) 16 Shandon, Water System Purpose The purpose

More information

System Development Fee Analysis. Prepared for. Brunswick Regional Water and Sewer H2GO

System Development Fee Analysis. Prepared for. Brunswick Regional Water and Sewer H2GO Prepared for Prepared by: 120 N. Boylan Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 License No. F-0115 TWC No. 3081-AH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary... 1 2 Introduction... 2 2.1 Background... 2 2.2 Purpose... 3 3

More information

CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2

CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2 CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2 September 13, 2016 NOTE: Until the rate study is completed and approved by City Council, all information presented

More information

SECTION 5.0 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT WASTEWATER SERVICE

SECTION 5.0 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT WASTEWATER SERVICE 5.1 Overview SECTION 5.0 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT WASTEWATER SERVICE The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services for

More information

2019 Annual Review of Sewer Rates and Environmental Updates Under the Sewer & Watercourse By-law

2019 Annual Review of Sewer Rates and Environmental Updates Under the Sewer & Watercourse By-law ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: November 27, 2018 Contact: Daniel Roberge Contact No.: 604.873.7360 RTS No.: 12725 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: December 11, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Vancouver

More information

Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Agencies

Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Agencies Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Agencies Combined Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Study (2 nd Round) Contra Costa LAFCO April 9, 2014 What We ll Cover: Municipal Service Review

More information

SEWER RATE AND FEE STUDY

SEWER RATE AND FEE STUDY SEWER RATE AND FEE STUDY Final Report January 2016 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Consultants 1889 Alcatraz Avenue Berkeley, California 94703 www.bartlewells.com Tel: 510/653 3399 2016

More information

Water Pollution Control Utility Financial Planning Study

Water Pollution Control Utility Financial Planning Study City of Pocatello 911 North 7th Avenue P.O. Box 4169 Pocatello, ID 83205-4169 Water Pollution Control Utility Financial Planning Study June 16, 2014 Report Prepared By: 12835 E Arapahoe Rd. Tower II, Suite

More information

Community Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006

Community Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006 C Community Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006 Executive Summary Item: 2007 22 Metropolitan Council meeting date: January 24, 2007 ADVISORY INFORMATION Date: January 10, 2007 Subject:

More information

FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection Fees Aurora Water (Platted Before January 1, 2017)

FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection Fees Aurora Water (Platted Before January 1, 2017) FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection s (Platted Before January 1, 2017) Connection s Connection s consist of three components: 1), 2) Sanitary Sewer Connection and 3) Metro Wastewater District

More information

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES 7.1 Introduction The Water Works Board of the City of Auburn (AWWB) is the primary potable water service provider for the City of Auburn (City) and Auburn University. There are

More information

WESTERN HILLS WATER DISTRICT

WESTERN HILLS WATER DISTRICT WESTERN HILLS WATER DISTRICT PROPOSED WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE INCREASES GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS HISTORY THE WHWD BOARD WHWD BUDGET DEFICITS WHAT WHWD HAS DONE RECENTLY THE RATE STUDY RAW WATER COSTS SEWER

More information

Technical Memorandum - Final

Technical Memorandum - Final Technical Memorandum Final Water andenvironment Subject: Tuscany Meadows Offsite Sewerage Impacts Evaluation Prepared For: Patricia Chapman, DDSD Prepared by: Chris van Lienden, RMC Reviewed by: Gisa Ju,

More information

West Bountiful City. Water System Capital Facilities Plan

West Bountiful City. Water System Capital Facilities Plan Water System Capital Facilities Plan August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 Definition of Terms and Abbreviations... 2 3.0 Introduction... 3 3.1 Background...3 3.2 Scope of Investigation...3

More information

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Water and Sewer System Development Charge Study Final Report February 2018 MFSG 911-A Commerce Road Annapolis, MD 21401 410.266.9101 mfsgllc.com Municipal & Financial

More information

Environmental Task Force SSSMP Summary, September 18, 2011 Scheduled for City Council Approval September 26, 2017

Environmental Task Force SSSMP Summary, September 18, 2011 Scheduled for City Council Approval September 26, 2017 Attachment 1 Environmental Task Force SSSMP Summary, September 18, 2011 Scheduled for City Council Approval September 26, 2017 Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Summary Points - City s sanitary system

More information

Proposed Water Rate Adjustment

Proposed Water Rate Adjustment Proposed Water Rate Adjustment Frequently Asked Questions Q: Why do utility rates need to be adjusted now? A: The City reviewed water rates as part of a 10-year financial plan and determined that rates

More information

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Village of Algonquin, located along the Fox River in McHenry County, provides wastewater collection and treatment services to the entire

More information

Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis Capital Improvement Plan City of Lockhart February 2017

Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis Capital Improvement Plan City of Lockhart February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 ANALYSIS OF WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS... 1 2.1 Present Water Demands... 1 2.2 Water Supply... 3 2.3 Water Treatment Plant... 4 2.4 Storage, High-Service Pumps,

More information

DRAFT. Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report. Napa Sanitation District

DRAFT. Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report. Napa Sanitation District DRAFT Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report Napa Sanitation District December 2011 DRAFT Executive Summary Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report 2 The Napa Sanitation District

More information

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.b REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: January 10, 2012 SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12-1, AUTHORIZING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER

More information

WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and held at the regular scheduled City Council meeting of September 25, 2014;

WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and held at the regular scheduled City Council meeting of September 25, 2014; Ordinance No. XX-XX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN, THE WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS, AND AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 13 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF PARK CITY, UTAH SETTING FORTH THE ASSESSMENT

More information

CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES

CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES 1 CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES MWD Member Agencies shown: MWDOC, SDCWA, Calleguas, Las Virgenes, West Basin, LADWP, Eastern and Foothill Member

More information

WHEREAS, the Board has previously so adopted a wastewater supply system comprehensive plan, and

WHEREAS, the Board has previously so adopted a wastewater supply system comprehensive plan, and LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT King County, Washington Resolution No. 2017-1283 A RESOLUTION of the Board of Commissioners of the Lakehaven Water and Sewer District, King County, Washington, adopting

More information

Volume 1 Executive Summary

Volume 1 Executive Summary 2013 Cheyenne Water and Wastewater Master Plans Final November 27, 2013 Prepared for: City of Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities 2416 Snyder Ave. Cheyenne, WY 82001 Prepared by: HDR Engineering AMEC Earth

More information

APPENDIX B THE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ROBINSON DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTHORITY ' S WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION

APPENDIX B THE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ROBINSON DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTHORITY ' S WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTHORITY ' S WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTHORITY S WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM The existing water distribution system

More information

Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County

Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County Water System Plan CH2M Hill, Inc. October 2010 Date Lee H. Odell - Washington PE: #29695 CH2M Hill, Inc. Contents Contents... i 1 Executive Summary... 1

More information

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 n g TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: January 26, 200 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

More information

San Francisco PUC Clean Water Enterprise Wastewater Rate Study

San Francisco PUC Clean Water Enterprise Wastewater Rate Study San Francisco PUC Clean Water Enterprise Wastewater Rate Study October 2003 201 South Lake Avenue, Suite 803 Black & Veatch Corporation Pasadena, CA 91101 Tel: (626) 583-1881 Fax: (626) 583-1411 Ms. Patricia

More information

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO REVISED: February 23, 2015

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO REVISED: February 23, 2015 SUMMARY: The Sewerage System User Bylaw sets out the rates charged for use of the City s sanitary sewer system. Provisions are made for a residential monthly flat rate charge and a commercial monthly charge

More information

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION DRAFT MAY 2016 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL This 2016 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan for the is a general update to the 2007 Plan, and addresses the District s comprehensive planning needs for wastewater

More information

City of Richland Comprehensive Water System Plan

City of Richland Comprehensive Water System Plan City of Richland June 2010 RH2 Engineering, Inc 114 Columbia Point Drive, Suite C Richland, WA 99352 Contact: Paul R. Cross, P.E. (509) 946-5181 Prepared by: June 2010 Signed: 6/28/2010 Signed: 6/28/2010

More information

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES 7.0 Introduction T he Water Works Board of the City of Auburn (AWWB) is the primary potable water service provider for the City of Auburn (City) and Auburn University. There are

More information

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT July 12, 2017 (Agenda)

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT July 12, 2017 (Agenda) CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT July 12, 2017 (Agenda) LAFCO 14-01 APPLICANT ACREAGE & LOCATION PURPOSE Sphere of Influence Amendment Contra Costa Water District

More information

Calculating System Development Charges for Stormwater Facilities

Calculating System Development Charges for Stormwater Facilities Calculating System Development Charges for Stormwater Facilities Arthur C. Nelson Reprinted with permission from Nelson, Arthur C. 1995. System Development Charges for Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater

More information

Ten Year Capital Improvement Program. For Fiscal Years

Ten Year Capital Improvement Program. For Fiscal Years Ten Year Capital Improvement Program For Fiscal Years 2017-2026 Contra Costa Water District Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program For Fiscal Years 2017-2026 Board of Directors Joseph L. Campbell, President

More information

POWDER MOUNTAIN WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN

POWDER MOUNTAIN WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN May 31, 2018 POWDER MOUNTAIN WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN 4246 S. Riverboat Rd. Ste 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84213 T 801.359.5565 F 801.359.4272 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT. Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council. Diana Langley, Public Works Director. Water and Wastewater Rate Study

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT. Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council. Diana Langley, Public Works Director. Water and Wastewater Rate Study CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 5 Date: March 1, 2016 To: From: Presentation by: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council Public Works Department Diana Langley, Public Works Director Summary

More information

PRELIMINARY REGIONAL WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS WASHINGTON COUNTY, UTAH

PRELIMINARY REGIONAL WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS WASHINGTON COUNTY, UTAH PRELIMINARY REGIONAL WATER IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS WASHINGTON COUNTY, UTAH SECTION A: DEMAND CONSIDERATIONS SECTION B: SUPPLY CONSIDERATIONS SECTION C: EXISTING PROJECTS WITH

More information

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: FEBRUARY, 2019

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: FEBRUARY, 2019 [Type here] GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: FEBRUARY, 2019 FY 2019 - Operating Actual vs. Budgeted 2019 - Key Performance Indicators Actual Budgeted % Variance Operating

More information

San Francisco Water PowerS<

San Francisco Water PowerS< San Francisco Water PowerS< Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 525 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 T 415.554.3155 F 415.554.3161 TTY 415.554.3488 DATE: TO:

More information

Water and Wastewater Cost of Services Analysis June 2016

Water and Wastewater Cost of Services Analysis June 2016 B a r r o w C o u n t y, G e o r g i a Water and Wastewater Cost of Services Analysis June 2016 Prepared for: Prepared by: The Barrow County Board of Commissioners NELSNICK Instructional Design & Planning

More information

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: MARCH, 2019

GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: MARCH, 2019 [Type here] GROUNDWATER REDUCTION PLAN MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT MONTH REPORTED: MARCH, 2019 FY 2019 - Operating Actual vs. Budgeted 2019 - Key Performance Indicators Actual Budgeted % Variance Operating

More information

Calendar Year capital improvement. Program

Calendar Year capital improvement. Program Calendar Year 2010 capital improvement Program Important Notice: The information found in this file concerning the 2010 Capital Improvements Program, has been extracted from the San Antonio Water System

More information

REVENUE REQUIREMENTS AND COST OF SERVICE RATES

REVENUE REQUIREMENTS AND COST OF SERVICE RATES REVENUE REQUIREMENTS AND COST OF SERVICE RATES BLACK & VEATCH PROJECT NO. 195753 & 195754 PREPARED FOR City of St. Joseph, Missouri Water Protection Division JUNE 2017 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2011.

More information

Planada Community Services District Municipal Service Review

Planada Community Services District Municipal Service Review Final Report Planada Community Services District Municipal Service Review Prepared for: Merced County Local Agency Formation Commission Prepared by: April 2015 As Approved by LAFCO April 15, 2015 EPS #141037

More information

City of Flushing. Water and Sewer Rates

City of Flushing. Water and Sewer Rates City of Flushing Water and Sewer Rates Current Water Rates $10.00 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $30.00) 5.40 per 1,000 gallons used The City of Flushing s last water

More information

Cypress Waters: TIF Plan and MOU Amendments, Related Service Plan/Development Agreements and Boundary Adjustments

Cypress Waters: TIF Plan and MOU Amendments, Related Service Plan/Development Agreements and Boundary Adjustments Cypress Waters: TIF Plan and MOU Amendments, Related Service Plan/Development Agreements and Boundary Adjustments Economic Development Committee June 1, 2015 Purpose Update status of Cypress Waters project

More information

DATE: June 16, Nobleton Community Development Charge Bylaw Update and Draft Background Study

DATE: June 16, Nobleton Community Development Charge Bylaw Update and Draft Background Study Finance Department Treasury Office Memorandum TO: FROM: Committee of the Whole Bill Hughes, Commissioner of Finance DATE: June 16, 2016 RE: 2016 Nobleton Community Development Charge Bylaw Update and Draft

More information

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BOULDER CITY, REPEALING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO TO INCREASE THE WATER SERVICE CHARGE

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BOULDER CITY, REPEALING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO TO INCREASE THE WATER SERVICE CHARGE RESOLUTION NO. 6490 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BOULDER CITY, REPEALING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 6213 TO INCREASE THE WATER SERVICE CHARGE WHEREAS, Chapter 9-8 of the City Codes established regulations

More information

First Amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan for the Northeast Gateway 1 Urban Renewal Area

First Amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan for the Northeast Gateway 1 Urban Renewal Area Prepared by: Carrie Kruse, Office of Economic Development, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA 50309 Phone: 515/283-4012 Return Address: City Clerk City Hall, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA

More information

Table of Contents. 3.1 Source Capacity Analysis

Table of Contents. 3.1 Source Capacity Analysis Table of Contents 3.1 Source Capacity Analysis... 3-1 3.1.1. Design Criteria... 3-1 3.1.2. Source Capacity Evaluation... 3-1 3.1.2.1 Plateau Zone... 3-1 3.1.2.2 Cascade View Zone... 3-4 3.2 Storage Capacity

More information

Second Amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan for the Ingersoll-Grand Commercial Urban Renewal Area

Second Amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan for the Ingersoll-Grand Commercial Urban Renewal Area Prepared by: Carrie Kruse, Office of Economic Development, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA 50309 Phone: 515/283-4012 Return Address: City Clerk City Hall, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA

More information

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting Date: August 15, 2017 To: Project Sponsor and Lead Agency: Staff Contact: Project Title: Location: General Plan Designation:

More information

Handout 5: Stormwater Cost of Service

Handout 5: Stormwater Cost of Service Handout 5: Stormwater Cost of Service Introduction The purpose of this handout is to describe the current cost allocation methodology for the stormwater program. The existing Stormwater Management Service

More information

DRAFT. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Annandale, Minnesota DDA. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-14

DRAFT. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Annandale, Minnesota DDA. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-14 DRAFT Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Annandale, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-14 (HS Pintail, LLC Apartment Project) To be Adopted:

More information

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 22, 2015 Item No.: 15.a Department Approval City Manager Approval Item Description: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Overview 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

More information

Water Recycling Facility Project

Water Recycling Facility Project Water Recycling Facility May 15, 2006 How did we get here? December 2002 City facing $8,000,000 fines from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for Wastewater Discharge Violations. Existing

More information

SURFACE WATER UTILITY FEE

SURFACE WATER UTILITY FEE The Surface Water Utility Fee section of the FY2014 Budget Message provides background, impacts and actions associated with the County s prior and new surface water level of service in the unincorporated

More information

Northeast Gateway 2 Urban Renewal Plan. City of Des Moines, Iowa

Northeast Gateway 2 Urban Renewal Plan. City of Des Moines, Iowa Prepared by: Carrie Kruse, Office of Economic Development, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA 50309 Phone: 515/283-4012 Return Address: City Clerk City Hall, 400 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, IA

More information