6.1 Climate change / carbon reduction Energy saving Green procurement and retailing Air quality...

Transcription

1

2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION: MANAGING HKIA S ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND ONGOING MONITORING CO-BENEFITS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES KEY TARGETS KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS Climate change / carbon reduction Energy saving Green procurement and retailing Air quality Waste management Water usage Ecology and biodiversity Noise Engagement New development Environmental management systems WORKING WITH BUSINESS PARTNERS APPENDIX A - CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STATEMENT APPENDIX B - GREEN PROCUREMENT POLICY APPENDIX C - SUSTAINABLE DINING POLICY APPENDIX D ENERGY POLICY APPENDIX E CARBON OFFSET POLICY APPENDIX F BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY APPENDIX G - PLAN REVIEW PROCESS APPENDIX H - LIST OF DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES 2016/ APPENDIX I REGISTER OF COMPLETED ACTIONS APPENDIX J SAMPLE ACTION TABLE Airport Authority Hong Kong 2

3 List of Abbreviations AAB ACI-ACA AHU API APM APU AWTC BEAM BP EGSE EMP EV FGP FSC GSE GTC JV LGV LPG MVAC MFC NSC PCA PFA PRD SQCC VFD VOC WBCSD Airport Authority Building Airport Council International - Airport carbon accreditation program Air Handling Units Air Pollution Index Automated People Mover Auxiliary Power Unit Airport World Trade Centre Building Environmental Assessment Method Business Partner Electrical Ground Support Equipment Environmental Management Plan Electric Vehicle Fixed Ground Power Forest Stewardship Council Ground Support Equipment Ground Transport Centre Joint Venture Light Goods Vehicle Liquefied Petroleum Gas Mechanical Ventilation and Air Conditioning Midfield Concourse North Satellite Concourse Pre-Conditioned Air Pulverised Fuel Ash Pearl River Delta Systems Quality Control Centre Variable Frequency Drive Volatile Organic Compounds World Business Council for Sustainable Development Airport Authority Hong Kong 3

4 1. Introduction: Managing HKIA s Environmental Footprint 1.1. This document outlines Airport Authority Hong Kong s (AA) management of the environmental issues related to the planning, development and operation of Hong Kong International Airport. It covers the environmental initiatives that are currently being implemented by almost every department within AA and, by extension, certain aspects of its business partners, tenants and contractors. 1 Perhaps more importantly it also sets out the reasons why AA places such strong emphasis on environmental management, the principles that guide its approach, the specific issues that are relevant to each environmental aspect and, where applicable, the metrics to measure our performance against carefully developed targets Background AA is statutory body that is wholly owned by the Hong Kong Government. It has a vision to strengthen HKIA as a leading aviation hub and a key engine for the economic growth of Hong Kong. AA is committed to best practice environmental management and to being a leading environmental performer in Hong Kong. The Corporate Environmental Policy Statement was established in 2008 and updated in April 2015 (Appendix A). Other high level support can be found in our recently reviewed corporate values, AA s sustainability vision and a number of issue-specific environmental policies (Appendices B F). In May 2012 the senior management of AA and its business partners pledged, with the endorsement of the Transport and Housing Bureau, that HKIA would become the world s greenest airport. 1 The conditions for compliance with the Environmental Permit for the 3RS Project are handled separately by TRD. Airport Authority Hong Kong 4

5 1.3. Guiding Environmental Principles AA recognises that all of the goods and services consumed in the development and operation of HKIA are derived from functional ecosystems. Therefore the sustainability of HKIA is ultimately dependent on the continuing functionality of these ecosystems. AA s approach to environmental management aims to reflect this understanding by: a. Taking steps, where relevant to AA s role as an airport operator; b. Proactively minimising harm to protect and restore ecosystem function; c. Identifying and ascribing an appropriate value to any externalised costs; and d. Using the polluter pays principle to address these costs. AA s actions in this regard will be limited to those functions that are appropriate to its role as an airport operator. We further recognise that the preferred order for implementing environmental management options is: avoidance, reduction, mitigation and compensation The Business Case for Environmental Management The business case for optimising AA s environmental footprint falls into two categories: a. Reducing the costs associated with developing and operating the airport. These include the acquisition, maintenance, replacement and disposal of consumables and infrastructure. Ideally, a full life cycle analysis, including all of the above factors, should be conducted to more accurately determine the cost of environmental initiatives. b. Minimising a range of operational, regulatory and reputational risks in order to: i. establish a more resilient operating environment, ii. meet current and future regulatory requirements, iii. meet and shape public expectations for environmental performance. Environment and the social license to operate and grow: It is worth noting that public concerns regarding impacts on local biodiversity and public health even where projects comply with regulatory requirements are the principal causes for delay in securing development approval both amongst airports worldwide and for the majority of large infrastructure projects in Hong Kong. As a result, the value of addressing risks to HKIA around regulation and the social licence to operate and grow is significant. 1.5 Collaboration AA is not solely responsible for the environmental footprint of HKIA. Airlines and ground services equipment operators burn fuel that generates carbon and toxic emissions; retailers and caterers consume natural resources to provide food and goods at the airport, and every organisation operating at HKIA uses electricity and generates waste. As a result, AA collaborates closely with its suppliers, business partners, passengers, regulators, local communities and environmental NGOs and other stakeholders to reduce HKIA s environmental footprint. Wherever possible we adopt an airport wide approach, whereby AA acts as the facilitator for programmes that include multiple business partners in order to accelerate the rate of footprint Airport Authority Hong Kong 5

6 reduction and further embed environmental thinking into the DNA of the whole airport community. 2. Scope of the Environmental Plan This plan addresses the following environmental aspects: 1. Climate change / carbon reduction 7. Ecology and biodiversity 2. Energy saving 8. Noise 3. Green procurement and retailing 9. Engagement 4. Air quality 10. New development 5. Waste management 11. Environmental management systems 6. Water usage 2.1. Developing and Updating the Environmental Plan All of AA s environmental goals should meet the key environmental principles and serve the business objectives described above. At times, the requirement for attainment of an environmental footprint reduction target may conflict with operational requirements, or the financial objectives of AA or its business partners. In such circumstances AA will: a. Seek the views of internal and external stakeholders that may be affected; b. Set performance standards that allow flexibility and encourage innovation in the approach for achieving compliance; c. Allow lead times that respect investment cycles; d. Provide the necessary infrastructure to enable compliance, where appropriate; e. Secure the endorsement of AA s senior management for amendments to the plan; and f. Monitor the outcome of the measures and adapt the plan accordingly. Appendix G outlines the Plan Review Process for the relevant departments to follow. 3. Implementation and Monitoring Each department is required to: a. Work with SUST to establish a list of specific measures to reduce HKIA s environmental footprint, taking into consideration the five-year business plan and the current Masterplan; b. Monitor its progress in implementing those measures throughout the year; c. Provide quarterly progress reports to SUST; d. Report status in the quarterly AA Environmental Coordination Group; Airport Authority Hong Kong 6

7 SUST is required to: a. Conduct an annual review of the Plan to assess AA s progress in reducing its environmental footprint; b. Revise targets and the overall environmental strategy, where appropriate, in order to drive continual improvement in AA s environmental performance in pursuit of the greenest airport objective; c. Make reference to the relevant disclosures provided in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and Airport Operators Sector Disclosures and the ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management System when reviewing the Plan to facilitate the assessment and reporting of environmental performance. d. Consolidate quarterly updates and keep a copy of the most updated Plan. 4. Co-benefits of environmental initiatives Some of the environmental initiatives in this Plan could have multiple environmental benefits. As an example, the replacement of diesel vehicles with EVs reduces emissions of both carbon and air pollutants. To fully reflect their environmental benefits, a section for indicating their cobenefits have been added to this Plan. 5. Key targets In the coming years, AA will focus on three areas: carbon reduction, energy consumption and waste management. Targets are set out below: Reduce carbon intensity by 10% by 2020 relative to 2015 levels Reduce energy consumption by 18M kwh by 2020 Recycle/recover 50% of all waste generated by 2021 In addition, AA is developing a biodiversity conservation action plan and a number of air pollution control measures. Airport Authority Hong Kong 7

8 6. Key Environmental Aspects 6.1 Climate change / carbon reduction Background In response to the UNFCCC Paris Agreement which sets out an objective to limit global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius, the international community has stepped up efforts in reducing carbon emissions. China has set a target to peak its absolute emissions by 2030 and to reduce emission intensity (emission per GDP) by 60% - 65% from 2005 levels. Hong Kong has committed to reduce carbon intensity (emission per GDP) by 50% 60% by 2020 from 2005 levels, and recently committed to a reduction of 65% - 70% by As one of the fast growing emission sources, the aviation sector could be subject to further regulatory control as a reflection of its contribution to national emissions. As an example, Beijing Capital International Airport and Pudong International Airport will be included in the Chinese national carbon trading scheme that would be launched in In response to the growing regulatory risk, AA must strive to reduce its carbon footprint. Given that Business Partners (BPs) account for 60% of the airport-wide carbon footprint, AA needs to collaborate with BPs to set targets and implement measures to accelerate the reduction of its footprint. With the concerted efforts by AA and airport BPs, airport-wide carbon intensity was reduced by 25.6% as of end 2015 relative to 2008 levels, despite continuous growth in airport throughput. The achievement has surpassed the original commitment to reduce carbon intensity by 25%. In Nov 2016, following consultation, AA and BPs pledged to further reduce HKIA s carbon intensity by 10% by 2020 relative to 2015 levels. Annual ATM k 391 k 406 k 301 k k 334 k Airport Authority Hong Kong 8

9 Potential drivers for change International community s call for limiting global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius. NGOs pressure for corporate to set a sectoral science-based carbon target to align with the 2 degrees commitment. China s and HK s targets to reduce carbon intensity by New business case for achieving new targets (e.g. future carbon price). Introduction of national carbon charge or trading in China. Challenges Increasing air traffic and infrastructure (3RS). Despite the efforts to reduce energy consumption, AA has no control over the emission factor of the energy purchased from its power supplier. This is a significant factor that influences HKIA s substantial Scope 2 emissions. Targets/commitments Reduce airport-wide carbon intensity by 10% by 2020 relative to 2015 levels. AA is signatory to the 2008 Aviation Industry Commitment to Action on Climate Change a long-term target to work towards carbon neutral growth. Retention of ACI-ACA Level 3 accreditation. Airport Authority Hong Kong 9

10 New and ongoing actions Action Year Actions and Targets Conduct annual third party verification for AA s carbon footprint (SUST) Carry out on-site carbon audit for BPs & review (SUST) Renew ACI-ACA Level 3 accreditation (SUST) Renew Carbon Reduction Certificates (renamed from the formerly Carbon Less Certificates) under HKAEE organised by Environmental Campaign Committee (ECC) (SUST) 2015 Establish short-term (5-year) carbon reduction target beyond 2015 (SUST) 2016 Organise a CEO luncheon for inviting business partners to join the new carbon pledge (SUST) Target Completion Date Annually Q (3-yearly) Q Q Enhance functions of Carbon Audit System (SUST) Establish technical working group for business partners to provide a platform for sharing technical knowledge of carbon/energy technology (SUST) Implement a benchmarking scheme to facilitate comparison of business partners performance within their sector (SUST) Establish an award scheme to encourage sharing of ideas and raise profile of best practices solutions among business partners (SUST) Establish senior executive roundtable for business partners to secure senior management support (SUST) Q Q Q Q Explore setting long-term carbon reduction target (SUST) Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 10

11 6.2 Energy saving Background Energy savings are closely related to managing carbon emissions because the energy used by the airport is principally derived by burning coal and gas for electricity generation. AA makes every effort to reduce energy consumption at the airport. It has achieved significant reduction in recent years from replacement of traditional lighting with LEDs and reconfiguration of its chillers. AA s electricity usage in 2015 was kwh. The chart below shows AA s electricity consumption. Priorities for reducing energy use focus on significant electricity demand areas including cooling and lighting systems. There is also an ongoing need for replacement of fans, pumps and motors to maintain energy efficiency. AA has set a target to save 18M kwh by 2020, which is equivalent to the annual electricity use of 4,000 households. To achieve the target, AA will implement a series of energy saving measures including the replacement of over 80,000 LED lights at Terminal 1, optimising the energy consumption of Midfield Concourse, and the conversion of apron high-mast lighting to LED light sources. Remarks: Electricity consumption includes AA's facilities such as Terminal 1, Terminal 2, North Satellite Concourse, SkyPier, HKIA Tower, Airport World Trade Centre, etc. SkyPier 2 and NSC came into operation since Sep 2009 and Nov 2009 respectively. Potential drivers of change Financial savings there is a direct dollar saving for every reduction in energy usage. Reduction in carbon emissions attributable to AA s operations contributing to HKSAR government overall target. Airport Authority Hong Kong 11

12 Challenges Growing number of passengers, flights and supporting infrastructure. Low-hanging fruit measures are exhausted. Future energy saving measures require higher investments. Co-benefits: Energy savings relating to the replacement of equipment with a lower electricity consumption (such as lighting fixtures and air handling units) will also yield a reduction in the overall carbon footprint of the site. Targets/Commitment Reduce airport-wide carbon intensity by 10% by 2020 relative to 2015 levels. Reduce energy consumption by 18M kwh by Develop an energy management system in line with the principles of ISO 50001:2011 and work towards future certification by Airport Authority Hong Kong 12

13 New and ongoing actions Action Year Actions and Targets (A) Energy Savings Lighting Target Completion Date Since 2015 Implement LED lighting for new advertising light boxes while replacing all existing light tubes of advertising light boxes with LED lighting upon aging condition (RAD) Enhance gantry lighting control (TSD) Q Replace the 1 st phase of LED bulbs and tubes installed in 2009 with latest LEDs with highest efficiency. Remaining phases will be monitored and carried out according to the end of product s service life (TSD) Q Replace T2 LED Gantry light (TSD) Q Adopt seasonal control of lighting (TSD) Q Replace High Pressure Sodium highbay downlights by LEDs, 200nos (AD) 2017 Replace LEDs in T1 (TSD) Q (B) Energy Savings - Cooling Since 2014 Since 2015 Replace 2 HV Chillers for T1 to improve energy efficiency (TSD) Replace traditional air handling units (AHU) motors with high efficiency motors (TSD) (C) Energy Savings Electricity consumption Conduct feasibility study of moving SQCC facilities offsite that involves co-location, cloud and managed services for both the testing and development environments. Part of the objectives is to explore opportunities of energy saving by optimising use of cloud and managed services. With the initial study result, a pilot project to relocate only the development environment can be further explored (ITD) Set up Energy Management System to improve energy efficiency and achieve ISO certificate (TSD) Q Q Q Q Conduct modification to achieve Meter Online System (TSD) Continue server virtualisation target virtualised 60% of eligible servers by end of FY16/17 to better utilise server resources and save data centre energy (ITD) Save 21% on building energy use comparing to the baseline established in the Green Airport Design Report at MFC (TSD) Q Q Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 13

14 Conduct pilot installations of local invented EV chargers (HKPC & PolyU) (TSD) Save a further 5% on energy use by carrying out recommissioning at MFC (TSD) Conduct pilot installation of Analytic Energy Management System (AEMS) at existing Terminals (TSD) 2017 Continue server virtualisation target virtualised 70% of eligible servers by end of FY17/18 to better utilise server resources and save data centre energy (ITD) Since 2014 Q Q Q Q Install LEDs for Apron High Mast Light (HML) (TSD) Q (D) Others Participate in Power Smart Energy Saving Contest organised by Friends of the Earth (SUST & TSD) Achieve Energywise label under HKAEE scheme (SUST) Annually Bi-Annually (Q4 2016, Q4 2018) Airport Authority Hong Kong 14

15 6.3 Green procurement and retailing Background Many of the primary services for AA s airport management and development work are outsourced to contractors and suppliers. Procurement activities are managed separately for daily operation and for development projects. As the airport operator, AA oversees the sustainability of HKIA as a whole, and it is important that AA work with reputable contractors and suppliers that manage their environmental and social impacts responsibly. In 2014/15, AA developed and launched a five-year plan for managing sustainability matters in our supply chain. AA committed to embed sustainability considerations in our procurement processes, including the selection of suppliers. The plan follows a three-pronged approach to reflect the different levels of control that AA exercises over its supply chain. AA has been a founding member of the Hong Kong Green Purchasing Charter since A Corporate Green Procurement Policy was developed in 2008 and a revised version was issued in 2016 (Appendix B). To encourage AA s tenants and business partners to take direct responsibility for their own environmental management, AA organizes an HKIA Environmental Management Recognition Scheme on a bi-annual basis. The scheme was first introduced in 2012 and held again in In 2016, the scheme will be extended to cover airport business partners and passengers. The Scheme aims to prepare business partners and tenants for the HKSAR Government Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) charging, raise their awareness on waste minimisation and recycling and promote AAHK s waste reduction and recycling efforts to the public. Potential drivers for change To align with the HKSAR Government s initiatives in conserving resources and reduction of waste. To actively manage our supply chain to fulfill GRI G4 reporting requirements. PR opportunities for retailers who participate in AA award schemes. Recognition for best practice for AA. Challenges Tenants often lack the incentive to make necessary investments or behavior changes, particularly if they themselves have short leases. Potential higher costs of eco-friendly products which disincentivise AA, tenants or business partners from procuring such products. Limited availability and difficulties in sourcing green products are major barriers towards purchasing environmentally sustainable products. Co-benefit The addition of environmental-related aspects to the Tenants Fit Out Handbook will encourage reduce waste reduction and improve air quality. Reducing hardcopy printing for all in-house training will also reduce waste. Low footprint logistics arrangements for sustainable development-related luncheon training will also achieve waste reduction. Airport Authority Hong Kong 15

16 Targets To further enhance the environmental performance of the supply chain through tightening of environmental requirements in contract documentation. To identify opportunities for engaging with tenants, business partners and passengers to develop new initiatives for environmental footprint reduction. Airport Authority Hong Kong 16

17 New and ongoing actions Action Year Actions and Targets (A) Paper consumption Since 2013 Continue to produce publications on FSC-certified paper as far as possible (CCD, T1D) Continue to source 100% recycled or FSC certified paper for washroom consumption (T1D) Since 2014 Adopt e-recruitment System in mass recruitment process to reduce hardcopy printing (HRA) Adopt e-evaluation to evaluate all in-house training programs instead of asking participants to fill-in paper evaluation form (HRA) Explore the e-pr System to reduce paper for PR processing (Procurement) 2016 Conduct feasibility study and explore solution of e-tendering (RAD) (B) Other initiatives Since 2013 Reduce hardcopy printing for all in-house training (HRA) Work with Procurement, ITD, RAD, Projects, Legal to explore the need to strengthen environmental requirements and standards in the environmental clauses of AA s contractors/suppliers/service providers (SUST, RAD, ITD, Projects, Legal) Review Tenants Fit Out Handbook with TSD and RAD, consider adding / updating environmental-related aspects. Implement practical usage of green materials in the fitting out (SUST, TSD, RAD) Since 2014 Support low footprint logistics arrangements for sustainable development-related luncheon talks / training sessions hosted by SUST (HRA) Since 2015 Following the strategic review: (i) work with relevant departments to incorporate more environmental requirements in AA s contracts; (ii) review and update the templates of the EMP outline (SUST) Source new seating with recyclable materials as far as practicable, i.e. after fire load prerequisite (T1D) 2016 The IT061 Green IT Policy Strategy and Standards was established in 2013 and included requirements to acquire Energy Star labelled Office equipment (PC s). Update Green IT Policy to incorporate environmental considerations in product and supplier selection processes to align with AA s Corporate Green Procurement Policy (ITD) Target Completion Date Q /17 Q Q Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 17

18 Expand the scope of printer replacement in Managed Print Service for the continual promotion of eco-friendly printing (ITD) Publicize internally the revised Green Procurement Policy (PRO) Develop mechanisms and guidelines for translating the Green Procurement Policy into requirements for embedding into the procurement processes (PRO) Q Q3, 2016 Q4, 2016 Airport Authority Hong Kong 18

19 6.4 Air quality Background Air Quality is one of the most important environmental issues facing Hong Kong. Public concerns about emissions at HKIA principally come from residents in Tung Chung, which is located just to the south of the airport. While HKIA is close to Tung Chung, a number of other significant sources of emissions lie upwind and also influence air quality both at the airport and in Tung Chung. These include a major shipping lane, two power stations, and the North Lantau Highway. Further away, but nonetheless significant, regional emissions from the Pearl River Delta (PRD) also influence air quality in northwest Lantau. A range of emission sources are associated with the operation of HKIA. Some of these, including aircraft auxiliary power units (APU) and airside vehicular emissions, can be directly controlled by AA, while AA must work closely with key stakeholders such as airlines, ferry operators and a range of other airport business partners whose emissions AA does not control directly. AA continuously tracks outdoor air quality through two airport monitoring stations and a third control station on Sha Chau since Since 2013, AA has commissioned experts from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) to develop inventories of emissions from key sources including airside vehicles and Ground Support Equipment (GSE), aircraft landing and take-off (LTO) emissions, landside vehicles serving the airport and ferries moving passengers to and from the SkyPier. The inventories provide the evidence based to identify the most cost-effective policies and solutions to reduce emissions at HKIA and also provides useful insights into regional air quality. Potential drivers for change While background air quality in Hong Kong is improving, public concern about poor air quality remains a potential constraint to future airport development. The wide range of new air quality improvement measures implemented by the Government has reduced emissions from the three major local sources. As a result, airport-related emissions account for an increasing proportion of local emissions in Hong Kong. Meet commitments in EIA reports and associated Environmental Permit conditions. Challenges Emissions from GSE and aircraft are not under AA s direct control. High capital cost of e-gse. Lack of government subsidy to promote retirement of aging diesel vehicles or pilot of low emission technology. For some GSE, electrification is either not technologically feasible or the technology is not yet mature. Airport Authority Hong Kong 19

20 Co-benefit The replacement of operating vehicle fleet, and the phasing out and replacement of Pre-VI vehicles with an electrified fleet will achieve overall carbon reductions as well as improve air quality. Targets Since July 2013, all new saloon cars in the Airport Restricted Area (ARA) must be electric. By July 2017, all petrol saloons in the ARA must be replaced by electric vehicles. Airport Authority Hong Kong 20

21 New and ongoing actions Action Year Actions and Targets Target Completio n Date (A) Air Quality Control Vehicle Emissions Since 2013 Replace operating vehicle fleet with EURO V vehicles (Airfield) Vehicle types Mobile liaison centre 1 Medium goods vehicles 1 Rubber removal vehicle 1 Wheelchair lift (additional) 3 Runway sweeper 2 Quantity Continue to explore with franchisees the feasibility of expediting replacement of legacy vehicles with cleaner vehicles (the latest EURO or equivalent emission standard) during the tender/renewal of catering, into plane fuelling services and GSE maintenance contracts Q Q Q Q Q On-going Monitor the replacement of aged vehicles and usage of the latest emission standard vehicles by ALD franchisees per franchise agreements (ALD) Since 2014 Undertake a market study for egse and evan availability (Airfield) Phase out Pre-Euro IV vehicles of AMD (TSD) Vehicle types Replace LGV Panel Vans (Euro II) with Euro V vans or E-vans Replace SPV (Aerial Works Platform) (Euro II) with Euro V diesel SPV Quantity 2 4 Q Q Replace eight Pre-Euro IV vehicles with vehicles either electrical / hybrid or other types complying to Euro V standards (HRA) 2016 Install Midfield Concourse charging stations Phase 2 (AD) - EV normal chargers 10 nos - EV quick chargers 3 nos - egse PosiChargers 5 nos 2017 Q Explore providing a biodiesel facility in the design of airside petrol fuelling stations (subject to market response) (ALD) 2020/21 Airport Authority Hong Kong 21

22 Since 2014 Since 2015 (B) Air Quality Control - Others Achieve the requirement of IAQwise Label and maintain the label (SUST & TSD) Plan to develop an Air Quality Management Strategy (SUST) Develop a framework for landside emission inventory by consultancy service with HKUST (SUST) Renew the air quality monitoring system (AQMS) contract (SUST) To upgrade the API website to calculate Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) (SUST) Renew the air quality charter under Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC) (SUST) Annually Q Q Q Q Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 22

23 6.5 Waste management Background Effective waste management is an issue of concern both to the Hong Kong public and Government, and to international airports. AA aims to reduce the absolute amount of waste generated, and to promote recycling of waste through a number of active measures to encourage separation of waste at source. In 2014, AA established a Waste Management Task Force, which is chaired by the Executive Director, Corporate Development and comprises the heads of key departments, to review existing waste management practices and identify possible solutions to reduce waste and promote recycling at HKIA. In 2015, AA commissioned a study to review AAHK s waste management practices with a view to develop a long-term strategy to achieve the 50% waste recycling/recovery target. The study revealed that, through the implementation of various waste reduction and recycling measures, the best achievable recycling rate for AAHK is 35%. To achieve the recycling/recovery target of 50%, it was proposed that AA improve its waste management practices, develop and implement a waste charging programme and explore the adoption of waste-to-energy technology at HKIA. AA will engage a consultant to develop and implement a waste charging pilot to prepare AA and its tenants for the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) charging legislation that is expected to come into effect in AA will commence a study to investigate the feasibility of developing a small-scale waste-toenergy plant at HKIA. The outcome of this study will recommend the most suitable waste treatment technology and the associated cost and time requirements. Airport Authority Hong Kong 23

24 Potential drivers for change To align with the global best practices adopted by hub-sized airports. To help the HKSAR Government to tackle the waste to landfill challenge. To prepare AA for the introduction of the Government s Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) charging legislation which is expected to come into effect in Meet commitments in EIA reports and associated environmental permit conditions. Publication of an emission factor for municipal solid waste would provide a driver for reduction of carbon in waste. Challenges No incentive for tenants and cleaning contractors to improve waste management system. AA s waste management system is complex and often tenants and contractors are not under AAHK sphere of influence or control, which hinders AA s efforts to improve waste reduction and recycling. The decentralized waste management system hinders AA s effort to implement a holistic approach for an integrated waste management system. Lack of resources such as space and manpower to further enhance sorting of waste at tenants premises and refuse rooms. Lack of market outlet in Hong Kong for low-value recyclables such as plastics. Co-benefits A reduction in waste to landfill will yield carbon reductions. Carpet replacement will improve indoor air quality through the avoidance of trapping pollutants, such as dust and dirt. Social outcomes are achieved through the engagement of the not-for-profit organization, Food Angel, and the delivery of the Food Rescue Programme to those in need. AA staff and the airport community will continue to be informed and educated through planned engagement activities on waste reduction such as workshops and training sessions. Targets Recycle/Recover 50% of all waste generated by To conduct a MSW charging pilot at HKIA. To investigate the feasibility of developing a small-scale waste-to-energy facility at HKIA. Airport Authority Hong Kong 24

25 New and ongoing actions Action Year Since 2013 Since 2015 Actions and Targets Explore initiatives to promote effective measures in reducing waste at source (RAD & SUST) Encourage franchisees to participate airport-wide recycle activities held by AA (ALD) Arrange for the landscape contractor to recycle festive plants (T1D & SUST) Achieve the requirements of the Wastewise Label and maintain the label annually (SUST & T1D) Develop common guidelines for airports in the Asia Pacific regions to promote aircraft cabin waste recycling (SUST) Maximise food waste separation and recovery of recyclable cutlery at Airside L7 food court (T1D) Continue partnership with Food Angel on Food Rescue Programme (SUST) Waste reduction strategy study: (T1D) - Reduce the use of toilet paper towels and undertake a study on the installation of high efficiency electric hand dryers - Improve sorting efficiency for the recyclable items from aircraft waste Target Completion Date Annually Annually Q Q Q Undertake a market study for new self-adhesive baggage tags, without peel-off parts (AD) Provide training to tenants and cleaning / waste contractor on waste separation at source (SUST) Encourage use of reusable water bottles: Introduce water bottle vending machine at/near Water Zone to encourage users to use reusable water bottles instead of paper cups for drinking water (T1D) Undertake waste survey to tenants to collect waste-related data (SUST) Arrange workshop on chemical waste management to AA staff and Business Partners (SUST) Annually 2016/2017 Q Q Explore food waste collection at HKIA Tower (HRA) Q Establish a waste working group comprises AA, key tenants and contractors(sust) Undertake trial on waste charging by phases (SUST) - Work with BEC to conduct trial at AWTC - Trial at terminal 2 Q Q Q Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 25

26 Commence a feasibility study for a waste-to-energy at HKIA (SUST and CWD) Replace carpet with Granite in T1: Replacement of a total of 56,800sq.m. carpeted areas to granite tiles at high passenger flow areas on level 6 departures, level 5 arrivals and level 4 APV lounges in T1 (T1D) Introduce central washing facilities at L7 East Hall Food Court to encourage usage of non-disposable tableware (RAD) 2017 Revamp the Airside Waste Station including initiatives to equip revolving sorting belt, to increase the waste separation efficiency (T1D) 2018 Review and incorporate new requirements to the contract specifications of the waste management contract/cleaning contracts to include more stringent reporting requirements and to incorporate performance-driven rewards and KPIs in the contracts. Contract duration to be reviewed with Procurement. (T1D) 2019 Support SUST to set up the waste charging system at HKIA in order to align with the Hong Kong wide waste charging legislation. T1D to participate in the joint-department task force to study the requirements for data collection and weighing waste at the point of collection. (T1D) Q Q Q / / /2020 Airport Authority Hong Kong 26

27 6.6 Water usage Background Potable water usage has increased in importance as the need to respond to climate changeinduced water scarcity has become more widely accepted. HKIA s innovative use of seawater for toilet flushing and air cooling has positioned it among the global leaders in potable water management. The inclusion of seawater in HKIA s triple water system (potable water, reclaimed water and seawater) also delivers substantial cost, energy and carbon savings over more traditional dual (potable and reclaimed) water systems. Treating and recycling grey water, which is required to meet government sewage and discharge regulations, is costly and energy-intensive. AA s grey water treatment plant has a daily capacity of 6,000m 3. In 2015, an average of 560m 3 per day recycled water was used for irrigation. Additional potential uses included new construction activities, vehicle washing and additional irrigation. A sustainable water strategy has been adopted for the Midfield Concourse (MFC) which covers demand reduction, grey water recycling and condensate water harvesting. Demand reduction is mainly supported by the use of sea water flushing and water-conserving sanitary fittings. Treated grey water and condensate water will be reused in the cooling system of the MFC to further reduce potable water consumption. In 2015 AA s fresh water usage was about 610,000 m 3. The consumption for previous years is summarized in the chart below: AAHK's Freshwater Consumption Total Amount, m 3 800, , , , , , , , , , , , , / / / / /16 Potential drivers for change Opportunity to secure and extend AA s leadership position on water management among comparably-sized airports. Upcoming major projects provide an opportunity to expand use of reclaimed water use in construction or a decrease in the supply. Greater demand for water in the Pearl River Delta may lead to an increase in the cost or a decrease in the supply of water in Hong Kong. Meet commitments in EIA reports and associated environmental permit conditions. Airport Authority Hong Kong 27

28 Challenges Further uses are constrained by the quality of treated water, limited distribution network for treated grey water, and the expense and operational difficulties in expanding this network. Targets Explore the increase usage of reclaimed water. To explore the source apportionment of water usage and to set a water reduction target. Airport Authority Hong Kong 28

29 New and ongoing actions Action Year Since 2015 Actions and Targets Encourage tenants to reduce water usage through HKIA Environmental Management Recognition Scheme. (SUST) Direct cobenefits N/A Target Completion Date Further explore the feasibility of improving the quality of treated water to increase the utilisation of treated water for construction use (SUST) Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 29

30 6.7 Ecology and biodiversity Background Conservation of biodiversity is important to the sustainable development of the city. In December 2016, the Government launched Hong Kong s first city-level Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (BSAP) ( ), to step up biodiversity conservation and support sustainable development. AA s development and operation may impact biodiversity around the airport. The loss of natural habitat associated with major engineering works is an inevitable part of major infrastructure development. Key species affected include two globally threatened or endemic species: Romer s Tree Frog and Chinese White Dolphin. The whole airport community has a duty of care. To avoid and minimise adverse impacts on biodiversity during the operation and development of HKIA, particularly towards these species. In February 2016, AA launched the HKIA Biodiversity Strategy (Appendix F). It aims to minimise the impacts of the development and operation of HKIA on biodiversity. A HKIA biodiversity conservation plan is currently under development. In order to further promote sustainable dining, AA reviewed and updated its Sustainable Dining Policy (Appendix C) in October 2016 which included a total ban on shark fin in all corporate dining events. AA has also committed to developing and implementing a Marine Ecology and Fisheries Enhancement Strategy (MEFES) under the three-runway system (3RS) Environmental Permit. The MEFES includes an independent Marine Ecology Enhancement Fund (MEEF) and Fisheries Enhancement Fund (FEF), respectively, to fund initiatives proposed by third parties that support the objectives of the MEFES. Wildlife trafficking continues to be a regular occurrence at Hong Kong s borders. This is especially the case with smuggled ivory and rhino horns, which have come through HKIA. In response to the threat wildlife crime poses, international decisions, alliances and enforcement collaborations are gaining momentum. Among these, International Air Transport Association (IATA) and Airport Council International (ACI) have pledged to join the effort to stop the transportation of illegal wildlife products. AA is expected to take a proactive response to address growing public concerns on these issues. Potential drivers for change Impacts on Chinese White Dolphins are a potential constraint on development of future operations requiring further reclamation. Tighter legislation following Hong Kong s adoption the Convention on Biological Diversity. Protection of corporate reputation by minimising consumption of unsustainably-sourced natural products. Growing public concern about wildlife trafficking. Meet commitments in EIA reports and associated environmental permit conditions. Secure social license to operate and grow. Challenges Competing demand for land, especially during 3RS construction. The airport community lacks awareness of wildlife trafficking. AA has no legal responsibly and enforcement power. Legal action over biodiversity-related issues might results in project delay and higher cost. Airport Authority Hong Kong 30

31 Target To develop a HKIA Conservation Action Plan. To raise airport community s awareness on wildlife trade issues. Airport Authority Hong Kong 31

32 New and ongoing actions Action Year Since 2013 Actions and Targets Explore initiatives to promote sustainable seafood concept to BPs and restaurants (SUST & RAD) Target Completion Date 2016 Review Sustainable Dining Policy (SUST) Annually Sponsor Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong to develop a Chinese White Dolphin Conservation Framework through HKIA Environmental Fund (SUST) Q Sponsor HKU Ant and Moth Study Q Develop a HKIA Conservation Action Plan (SUST) Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 32

33 6.8 Noise Background Noise from aircraft operations is an issue of concern for Hong Kong residents living close to the airport and flight path. Under Hong Kong law (Civil Aviation (Aircraft Noise) Ordinance Cap. 312) responsibility for managing aircraft noise is the responsibility of the Civil Aviation Department rather than AA. This is not widely understood by the public, and AA has had to respond to numerous complaints from affected residents. Airports in many other countries are directly accountable for noise associated with aircraft operations, and have developed a range of measures to address the issue. This is because airports were often built or close to large cities, and large numbers of residents were impacted, or because airports are held responsible for aircraft noise under local or regional legislation. Even though these conditions do not apply to HKIA, AA actively considers noise-related issues in its own planning and in assessing the potential impacts of future infrastructure and residential developments close to the flight path and AA s noise contours. An increase in the number of residents or other sensitive receivers that may be affected by noise generated by a new project may result in approval for that project being delayed or rejected. Potential drivers for change Improving relations with residents that are most affected and most active in challenging future development of HKIA. Improving HKIA s performance on noise management in pursuit of the greenest airport objective. Meet commitments in EIA reports and associated environmental permit condition. Challenges Responsibility for aircraft noise management lies with CAD rather than AA. Target To consider developing a noise management strategy by Airport Authority Hong Kong 33

34 New actions in this Plan Action Year Since 2015 Actions and Targets Consider the development of a noise management strategy (FPD, SPD, SUST) 2016 Gather information on best practice noise management from other airports through ACI and other engagement with airports and relevant experts (FPD, SUST) Provide indirect measures to mitigate the noise impacts to the affected villages/residents (e.g., in form of window insulation and air-conditioning) (OPSD) 2017 Implement a Pilot Quota Count ( QC ) Scheme as an aircraft noise management measure to incentivize airlines to use quieter aircraft as a test that may lead to the introduction of a noise charge. (FPD) Target Completion Date From Jan 2017 onward and to be reviewed after 2019 Airport Authority Hong Kong 34

35 6.9 Engagement Background Engagement with key stakeholders is an important part of the process of implementing changes that will reduce the environmental footprint of the airport. While engagement is not itself an environmental aspect, it is the principal tool in securing the necessary support to implement footprint reduction measures for every environmental aspect. SUST meets with four distinct stakeholder groups, each with a different purpose: Implementing departments within AA to implement internal footprint reduction actions and manage relationships with business partners. HKIA business partners to review environmental management plans and to develop workable footprint reduction strategies on relevant environmental issues. Environmental NGOs to better understand and respond to public expectations, and to learn of emerging technologies and approaches for footprint reduction. EPD and other relevant departments of the HKSAR Government to ensure AA complies with and supports existing and upcoming legislation, policies and initiatives. Local and international environmental associations and industry associations to learn from best practice, raise and participate in discussions of interest for footprint reduction at HKIA. SUST organises general environmental training and NGO-organised and other green activities for AA and airport community staff. It also arranges briefings and tours of environmental facilities with relevant departments including TSD and T1D for visitors with a specific interest in environmental issues. AA has established a HKIA Environmental Fund and provides display areas at the airport for the use of NGOs at no charge. Potential drivers for change Manage reputational risk and AA s social license to operate and grow. Building a cordial relationship with NGOs and business partners. To start actively managing AA s supply chain according to GRI G4 sustainability reporting requirements. Challenges Different operating environment and needs of implementing departments impose difficulties on setting up environmental targets. Behavioral change requires long term and sustainable engagement efforts. Targets Quarterly meetings with implementing departments. (AA Environmental Coordination Group). Quarterly meetings with business partners. (Airport Wide Environmental Forum). Half-yearly meetings with Environmental NGOs. (Environmental Liaison Group). At least 6 environmental training sessions for AA staff annually. Airport Authority Hong Kong 35

36 New and ongoing actions Action Year Since 2013 Since 2014 Actions and Targets Provision of at least 6 environmental training sessions for staff annually (SUST) Organise Airport Community Environmental Forum quarterly (SUST) Organise Environmental Liaison Group Meeting half-yearly (SUST) Organise annual International Coastal Clean Up for AA staff and Tung Chung community (SUST) Take part in Earth Hour organised by WWF-HK (SUST) Provide 6-8 environmental training sessions for staff annually (SUST) Provide at least one environmental activity for BPs (SUST) Incorporate of HKIA s green stories in PRD agency promotional materials Transport connection with Mainland China via e- marketing (MCDD) Incorporate environmental topics and promote green messages in future Mainland airport training course (MCDD) Continue working with the AMD, Projects and SUST teams to promote green messages in the airport visits (e.g. in presentation materials and tour of more green facilities at HKIA) (CCD) Continue publishing green stories and messages in HKIA News and pitching related features stories for mainstream media (CCD) Encourage NGOs and academics to address environmental issues relevant to HKIA and the community through the HKIA Environmental Fund Implement Green Office Programme / Campaign at AA s Office (SUST) Update the Greenest Airport Updates in corporate website (SUST) Explore opportunities to organise environmental-related events at HKIA (CS) Green Monday Programme at HKIA Encourage licensees to introduce vegetarian dishes and menus and join the programme (RAD) Target Completion Date Annually Enhance the CSR section of AA s corporate website (SUST) Q Engage 1) CX City 2) SkyCity Marriott Hotel 3) Regal Airport Hotel 4) KA-CNAC House 5) Asia World Expo 6) Petrol filling station: (APD) Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 36

37 Since 2015 i. Request business partners to submit new / updated Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for review ii. Conduct on-site environmental audit to identify areas for improvement and make suitable recommendations Monitor continuously and review of i), ii) and iii) and apply to new BPs where appropriate (APD) Collaborate with service contractors to promote Go-Green during their services delivery (T1D) Continue to encourage licensees to participate in Plastic Shopping Bag Charging Environmental Fund (RAD) Work with SUST to conduct 1) environmental audits for all franchisees; 2) review franchisees new/ updated environmental management plans; 3) encourage franchisees to implement new initiatives on footprint reduction (ALD) Provide environmental friendly themed workshops in Weekend Kids Workshop, e.g. making kid toys by recycled material (T1D) 2016 Maintain its presence in the Environment Committee of the Airport Council International (ACI) Asia Pacific and the ACI World Committee to raise the profile of AA s environmental initiatives and thought leadership in support of the Greenest Airport pledge (SUST) Demonstrate environmental thought leadership to support Greenest Airport Pledge through securing positions in ACI regional and global meetings (SUST) To share AA s best practices and strengthen credibility and relationships with key stakeholders (SUST) Launch HKIA Environmental Management Recognition Scheme (SUST) Post up Green Photos in AA Tower and officers to create an atmosphere of green environment (HRA & SUST) Expand the scope of printer replacement in Managed Print Service for the continual promotion of eco-friendly printing (ITD) Explore opportunity to organise an interactive exhibition in Terminal to promote energy saving messages to passengers (T1D) Improve awareness of Green Office practices for ITD staff and contractors by introducing new orientation package. Annual checking of attendance records for assurance of awareness (ITD) Q Q2-Q Q Q Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 37

38 6.10 New development Background To cope with the rapid growth in air traffic demand in HKIA, new developments such as Third Runway and Terminal 2 expansion are either under design or construction. A green airport design strategy is required by AA to ensure that the leading environmental standards, technologies and best practice are incorporated from the outset. In addition, it is more cost effective to incorporate green concepts into the design stage than retrofitting the buildings during the operation phase. Potential drivers for change Supporting HKIA s pledge to become the world s greenest airport. Improving environmental performance through design. Reducing the operating costs associated with developing and operating the airport. Airports in other countries raising the best practice bar. Targets To ensure all significant new facilities and infrastructure projects develop and follow a Green Airport Design Strategy. All new buildings should achieve a best in class standard for the relevant building type according to clearly defined performance benchmarks, where possible supported by an appropriate building environmental performance certification scheme. Challenges Need to consider the future price of carbon for new major developments. Need to consider the climate risks. BEAM-Plus may not be an appropriate tool for airport infrastructure. Airport Authority Hong Kong 38

39 New and ongoing actions Action Year Since 2014 Actions and Targets (Projects) 3RS Project and Terminal 2 Expansion Design and Construction 1. Design driven by targets / commitments from green design and 3RS EIA approval process 2. At least the same performance as MFC green design components (e.g. reduced use of timber; FSC certified timber, etc.) 3. New and specific commitments for design and construction come from P282 and P283 green design process and follow on detailed design for 3RS developments (expected 2016/17) 4. Full compliance with specific EP requirements under the EIAO and with ACE Recommendations 5. Establish and maintain effective means of managing and tracking against statutory and non-statutory environmental commitments during 3RS development process Target Completion Date 2024 Since 2014 Operations Design driven by targets / commitments from green design process New and specific commitments for design and construction come from P282 and P283 green design process (expected July 2014) Building Energy Efficiency Commit all new AA office and public use buildings achieve at least BEAM Plus GOLD certification (or equivalent) Commit all new AA office and public use buildings achieve at least BEAM Plus GOLD certification (or equivalent) 2016 Airport Authority Hong Kong 39

40 RS Design and Construction 1. 3RS detailed design Packages shall make reference to the Green Performance Indicators identified in the P283 Green Airport Design Report (Nov 2014) and the P282 Green Airport Design Report (where relevant) 2. 3RS detailed design packages are required to undertake a further green airport design assessments for specific works / facilities, including Lifecycle Cost assessment where appropriate, to facilitate informed decisions on incorporating good performance environmental systems and infrastructure into 3Rs developments - Terminal 2 Expansion - Third Runway Concourse - Other 3RS Works Packages 3. Beneficial green design elements that are recommended for each project will be confirmed by AA senior management, committed and implemented at later design stages and at construction and operations stages 4. Key Green Design commitments from each design works package will be itemised and tracked within this 5- year plan cycle (TRD) Building Energy Efficiency 1. Commit 3RS-related development achieves at least a BEAM Plus GOLD certification (or equivalent) standard when use of such a standard is viable for the building / development in question (TRD) Comply with EIA and EP commitments for all stages of the 3RS project will be adhered to, including implementation of all specific EP conditions and follow through on all committed mitigation measures and enhancement initiatives, including preparation for and designation of a new marine park and implementation of a Marine Ecology and Fisheries Enhancement Strategy including supporting related initiatives under Marine Ecology and Fisheries Enhancement Funds. (TRD) Engage continuously with the green non-governmental organsations (NGOs), fisherman groups, affected villagers and other relevant groups during the 3RS construction period (CCD, TRD) - During construction period Airport Authority Hong Kong 40

41 6.11 Environmental management systems Background International environment-related management systems including ISO Environmental Management System (EMS), ISO Energy Management Systems (EnMS) and ISO Greenhouse Gas Management Systems have been developed to facilitate the management of these aspects by corporates. To support its greenest airport pledge, SUST is working with TSD to establish and implement an Integrated Management System (IMS), which comprises an EMS and an EnMS that fulfils the requirements of ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 50001:2011 respectively. ISO and ISO Certifications are expected to be obtained in Feb 2017 and Dec 2017 respectively. Potential drivers for change To create a systematic response and rectification system to properly handle noncompliance arising from AA, BP or contractors activities at HKIA. Increase the credibility of AA s claims to be the world s greenest airport. Challenges The compliance-based checking exercises adopted in EMS may limit the creativity and innovative incentives. Targets To drive continuous improvement of AA by setting up targets and monitoring the progress. Airport Authority Hong Kong 41

42 New and ongoing actions Action Year Actions and Targets Since 2014 Align AA s EMS with ISO 14001:2015 Principles (SUST) Benchmarking Recommendations Since 2015 Obtain Certification under new ISO 14001:2015 Requirements (SUST) Benchmarking Recommendations Develop Energy Management System in line with ISO 50001:2011 Principles (SUST, TSD) Benchmarking Recommendations Consider ISO50001:2011 certification (SUST, TSD) Benchmarking Recommendations Target Completion Date Q Consider 2 nd greenest airport benchmarking study (SUST) Q Establish of ISO50001 for NSC & MFC (TSD) Q Obtain re-certification of ISO50001 for T1(TSD) Q Airport Authority Hong Kong 42

43 7. WORKING WITH BUSINESS PARTNERS To operate HKIA sustainability, AA must work with a range of franchisees, licensees, tenants, contractors and services providers. These include airlines, logistics companies, cargo terminals, catering companies. Therefore AA has built close relationships with its business partners. We aim to actively influence their environmental performance through contract agreements, collaborative targetsetting, award and incentive schemes and partnerships. By engaging business partners, we aim to continue the airport-wide carbon reduction programme and also to further improve business partners environmental performance via the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) submission requirement. Since it has emerged that adopting an airport-wide boundary rather than an airport operator boundary represents best practice in airport environmental management. AA is actively exploring opportunities to adopt this approach wherever it is feasible to do so. The sections below consolidate the general requirements and policies we expect business partners to follow. 7.1 General Requirements of Airport Business Partners: Obtain any statutory licenses, consents or exemptions relating to the protection of the environment and which are required for its activities and operation. Prepare its own environmental management plan (the "Plan") in relation to all its activities and operation, when required by the Authority. Take all reasonable steps to minimise waste arising from its activities and operation and separate recyclables at source. Co-operate with the Authority and participate in the implementation of the Authority s plan, policies, initiatives and commitments for the management of the environment at the Airport, including but not limited to the Airport-wide carbon reduction programme, carbon audit, environmental audit, waste survey and energy saving measures undertaken by the Authority when required by the Authority. 7.2 Policies to be followed by Airport Business Partners: Vehicle Emission Standards Unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority, the business partner of AA shall, in relation to all vehicles and mobile equipment that operate within the restricted area of the Airport, use electric vehicles and electric mobile equipment if such vehicles and mobile equipment are commercially available. If electric vehicles and/or electric mobile equipment are not used as aforesaid, the business partner shall use vehicles and mobile equipment, in the following descending order of priority, which are: i. powered by a hybrid of petrol engine and electric motor; or ii. powered by a hybrid of diesel engine and electric motor; or Airport Authority Hong Kong 43

44 iii. powered by an engine type that complies with the latest emissions standards (for vehicles this shall be the latest EURO (or equivalent) emission standards in force during the contract period If there are available vehicles and mobile equipment that achieve equal or lower local emissions than the types of vehicles and mobile equipment identified in conditions i to iii above, the business partner may, upon the approval of the Authority, use such vehicles and mobile equipment. Phase-in of Electric Vehicles Commencing from 1st July 2013, all newly purchased saloon cars that operate in the restricted area of the Airport must be powered by electric motor only and commencing from 1st July 2017, the entire fleet of business partners saloon cars that operate in the restricted area of the Airport must be powered by electric motor only. Airport Authority Hong Kong 44

45 Appendix A - Corporate Environmental Policy Statement Airport Authority Hong Kong 45

46 Appendix B - Green Procurement Policy Airport Authority Hong Kong 46

47 Appendix C - Sustainable Dining Policy Airport Authority Hong Kong 47

48 Appendix D Energy Policy Airport Authority Hong Kong 48