Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations"

Transcription

1 Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations Department of Agronomy MF-586 Nutrient Management Development of sound nutrient management programs involves knowledge of a wide range of information. Soil test records are an important piece of required information, but other factors such as soil moisture conditions, land ownership/tenure, crop and cropping sequence, pest management, cultural practices, environmental issues, and other management items are vital for developing sound nutrient management programs. It is beyond the scope of this publication to detail the ramifications of all these factors, but they should not be overlooked when finalizing nutrient application programs. The following tables, equations and accompanying information are the most recent soil test interpretations for major crops for the most commonly deficient plant nutrients in Kansas. These interpretations are valid for interpreting soil test values from the KSU Soil Testing Laboratory and other laboratories utilizing the same soil testing procedures. Yield Goals Suggested recommended application rates are tied to yield goals for several nutrients. Yield records should be used to set individual realistic, but progressive, yield goals for each field. Appropriate yield goals for a specific field should be high enough to take advantage of high production years when they occur, but not so high as to jeopardize environmental stewardship and/or profitability when environmental conditions are not as favorable. Appropriate yield goals fall between the average yield obtained in a field over the past to 5 years and the highest yield ever obtained in a particular field. Soil Sampling Depth. Interpretations for the nitrate-n, sulfate-s and chloride-cl soil tests are based on a 0-4 inch soil profile sampling depth. All other nutrient interpretations are based on surface soil samples collected to a depth of six inches. We suggest collecting a sample from the 0 to 4 inch depth for N, S and Cl recommendations and a separate 0- to 6-inch sample for ph, P, K, Zn, Fe and B soil test determinations. For lime, the recommended lime rate should be adjusted to reflect the depth of lime incorporation, while no-till and perennial crops should assume a depth of inches. Appropriate Soil Test Procedures The KSU soil test interpretations are based on the following soil test procedures: Soil ph : Water ph Buffer ph SMP Buffer (determines lime requirement) Nitrogen Available Nitrate-N Phosphorus: Bray P Extractable P Mehlich III Extractable P (ICP) interpreted the same as Bray P Olsen P multiply by.6 and interpret similarly to Bray P Potassium Ammonium Acetate Extractable Zinc, Iron and Boron DTPA Extractable Sulfur Calcium Phosphate Extractable Sulfate Chloride Mercury (II) Thiocyanate Extractable (Colorimetric) A downloadable version of these recommendations is available at Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service

2 Soil ph and Liming Interpretations A buffer ph will be determined and reported on all soils having a ph of less then 6.4. Options are provided for liming to various target ph s and information is provided for various areas of the state to aid in selection of an appropriate target ph, based on subsoil acidity and crops to be grown. Nitrogen Interpretations The nitrogen requirement for a specific crop and yield goal is adjusted by taking into account many field specific factors. The K-State nitrogen recommendation guidelines for all crops are directly adjusted for soil organic matter content. Twenty pounds of available N per acre is expected to be mineralized during the crop year for each.0 percent soil organic matter in the surface six inches for warm season crops (e.g. corn, grain sorghum), while 0 pounds nitrogen per acre is expected to be mineralized for each.0 percent soil organic matter for cool season crops (e.g. wheat). In addition, the previous crop, residual profile N, manure applications, irrigation water N content, grazing N removal and the tillage system utilized are additional factors used to refine suggested N application rates for specific crop situations. Detailed information for major crops is provided. Since nitrate (NO - -N) is mobile, we encourage use of a 0- to 4-inch soil sample to assess the profile N content (also for sulfate and chloride as they are mobile in soils as well). How and when N is applied can have a dramatic effect on how efficiently it will be utilized by the crop. For example, using delayed or split N applications on irrigated fields, particularly on sandy soils, often improves N use efficiency by reducing the potential for loss. Also, for high residue systems such as no-till, placing fertilizer N below the residue or dribbling N solution in concentrated bands on the soil surface offers the potential for improved N use efficiency for summer crops. Many factors other than application rate influence N use efficiency and should be taken into account when developing the overall nutrient management plan. Phosphorus and Potassium Interpretations. Kansas State University phosphorus and potassium recommendations provide two main options for producers, depending on circumstances for specific producers, fields and situations. Sufficiency fertility programs are intended to estimate the long-term average amount of fertilizer phosphorus required to, on the average, provide optimum economic return in the year of nutrient application while achieving about 90 to 95 percent of maximum yield. In some years greater amounts of nutrient are required for optimum yield and economic return, while in other years less than recommended amounts of nutrient would suffice. There is little consideration of future soil test values and soil test values will likely stabilize in the low, crop responsive range. Build-maintenance recommendations are intended to apply enough phosphorus or potassium to build soil test values to a target soil test value over a planned timeframe (typically 4 to 8 years) and then maintain soil test values in a target range in future years. If soil test values exceed the target range, no phosphorus or potassium is recommended with the exception of low starter applied rates if desired. Buildmaintenance fertility programs are not intended to provide optimum economic returns in a given year, but rather attempt to minimize the probability of phosphorus or potassium limiting crop yields while providing for near maximum yield potential. Secondary/Micronutrient Interpretations The KSU Soil Testing Lab offers soil tests and interpretations for sulfur, zinc, chloride, iron and boron. Detailed information is provided for interpreting soil test values for these nutrients and for recommending rates of application if they are deficient. To date in Kansas, we have not documented deficiencies of manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), or molybdenum (Mo) and do not offer interpretations for these micronutrients.

3 Nitrogen Rate Recommendation Adjustments for Cool Season s Soil Organic Matter (SOM) Adjustment Lb N Adjustment = % SOM x 0 Manure N Inorganic N 00% of Manure Worksheet value Organic N 50% of Manure Worksheet value Profile N Test ( foot sampling depth, if possible) Default 0 Lb N if Profi le N Sample Not Collected Lb N = 0. x Sampling Depth (inches) x ppm Profi le Nitrate-N Tillage Adjustment Conventional Tillage 0 Lb N No-Tillage + 0 Lb N Grazing Adjustment 40 Lb N per 00 Lb beef weight gain per acre Previous Adjustment Corn, Wheat 0 Lb N Sorghum, Sunflowers, + 0 Lb N Soybeans 0 Lb N Fallow Without Profi le N Test - 0 Lb N With Profi le N Test 0 Lb N With Stand Destruction Tillage Alfalfa Excellent Stand (> 5 plants/ft) - 60 Lb N Good Stand ( 5 plants/ft) - 40 Lb N Fair Stand (- plants/ft) - 0 Lb N Poor Stand (< plant/ft) 0 Lb N Red Clover Excellent Stand - 40 Lb N Good Stand - 0 Lb N Poor Stand 0 Lb N Sweet Clover Excellent Stand - 55 Lb N Good Stand - 0 Lb N Poor Stand 0 Lb N For no-till production, reduce nitrogen credit adjustment by 50 percent "Estimating Manure Nutrient Availability," MF-56 Nitrogen Rate Recommendation Adjustments for Warm Season s Soil Organic Matter (SOM) Adjustment Lb N Adjustment = % SOM x 0 Manure N Inorganic N 00% of Manure Worksheet value Organic N 00% of Manure Worksheet value Profile N Test ( foot sampling depth, if possible) Default 0 Lb N if Profi le N Sample Not Collected Lb N = 0. x Sampling Depth (inches) x ppm Profi le Nitrate-N Irrigation Water Nitrate N Lb N = ppm Nitrate-N in Water x 0.6 x Inches Irrigation Water Applied Previous Adjustment Corn, Wheat 0 Lb N Sorghum, Sunflowers 0 Lb N Soybeans - 40 Lb N Fallow Without Profi le N Test - 0 Lb N With Profi le N Test 0 Lb N With Stand Destruction Tillage Alfalfa Excellent Stand (> 5 plants/ft) - 0 Lb N Good Stand ( 5 plants/ft) - 80 Lb N Fair Stand (- plants/ft) - 40 Lb N Poor Stand (< plant/ft) 0 Lb N Red Clover Excellent Stand - 80 Lb N Good Stand - 40 Lb N Poor Stand 0 Lb N Sweet Clover Excellent Stand - 0 Lb N Good Stand - 60 Lb N Poor Stand 0 Lb N For no-till production, reduce nitrogen credit adjustment by 50 percent "Estimating Manure Nutrient Availability," MF-56

4 Corn Nitrogen Recommendations Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Bu) - Lb N N Rec, = (Yield Goal.6) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Manure N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Manure and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for warm-season crops). Maximum fertilizer N recommendations are 0 Lb N for Dryland Corn production and 00 Lb N for Irrigated Corn production. A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. Grain Sorghum Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Bu) Lb N N Rec = (Yield Goal.6) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Manure N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Manure and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for warm-season crops). A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. Wheat Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Bu) Lb N N Rec = (Yield Goal.4) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments + Tillage Adjustments + Grazing Adjustments Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Tillage, Grazing and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for cool-season crops). A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. 4

5 Sunflower Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Lb) Lb N, , , , , N Rec = (Yield Goal 0.075) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Manure N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Manure and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for warm-season crops). A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. Oats Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Bu) Lb N N Rec = (Yield Goal.) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments + Tillage Adj Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Tillage, Grazing and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for cool-season crops). A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. Corn/Sorghum Silage Nitrogen Recommendations Fertilizer N Required At Various Yield and Soil Organic Matter Levels Assuming Profile N Test Is Not Used (includes 0 Lb N residual default) Soil Organic Matter Content (%) Yield Goal (Ton) Lb N N Rec, = (Yield Goal 0.67) (% SOM 0) Profi le N Manure N Other N Adjustments + Previous Adjustments Total N requirements presented include only Yield Goal and Soil Organic Matter Adjustments assuming profi le N test not used. N rate should also be adjusted for Previous, Manure and Other Appropriate N Rate Adjustments (see N rate adjustments for warm-season crops). Maximum fertilizer N recommendations are 0 Lb N for Dryland Corn production and 00 Lb N for Irrigated Corn production. A minimum fertilizer N application of 0 Lb N may be appropriate for early crop growth and development. 5

6 Brome, Fescue and Bermuda Grass Nitrogen Recommendations N Required At Various Yield Goals Yield Goal (Ton) Production (Lb N) New Seeding (Lb N) Total N requirements presented only include Yield Goal Adjustments. These Total N requirements should be modifi ed for other appropriate adjustments. Liming Recommendations Lime Recommendations (Lb ECC) Target ph = 6.8 Target ph = 6.0 Target ph = 5.5 Buffer ph - lb ECC/acre , ,000, ,500,50, ,50,5, ,50 4,5, ,50 5,5,65 5.8,500 6,50, ,50 7,65, ,000 9,000 4, ,000 0,75 5,50 Based on 6.67 inch soil depth. Soil Depth is the depth of incorporation through rotation. For No-Till systems, alfalfa and grass assume inch depth of incorporation ( / of rate for 6-7 inch depth). When lime recommendation exceeds 0,000 lb ECC, we suggest applying one-half rate, incorporate, wait to 8 months and then retest. Target ph of 6.8 = [ 5,60 (6,60 Buffer ph) + (Buffer ph Buffer ph 9)] Depth (inches) All crops in Southeast Kansas east of Flinthills & south of Highway 56 Alfalfa and clover in Northeast Kansas Lime Rec if ph < 6.4 Target ph of 6.0 = [,80 (,80 Buffer ph) + (Buffer ph Buffer ph 96)] Depth (inches) All crops in Northeast Kansas except alfalfa and clover All crops in Central and Western Kansas Lime Rec if ph < 5.8 Target ph of 5.5 = [6,405 (,590 Buffer ph) + (Buffer ph Buffer ph 98)] Depth (inches) Cash fl ow/lime availability problem areas in Central and Western Kansas Lime Rec if ph < 5.5 6

7 Phosphorus and Potassium Recomendations Phosphorus and Potassium Removal Values Unit P K O Alfalfa & Clover ton 60 Bermudagrass ton 40 Bromegrass ton 40 Fescue, tall ton 40 Corn bushel Corn silage ton Grain sorghum bushel Sorghum silage ton Wheat bushel Sunfl owers pound Oats bushel Soybeans bushel Native grass ton Phosphorus Managment Model for Kansas Production and Manure Management Nutrient Recommendation Manure Allocation No Application 00 % 95 % Relative Yield (%) 50 % Sufficiency Recommendation Build Recommendation Maintenance Recommendation Starter Statement Starter Statement 0 ppm Critical Value 0 ppm Upper Build VL L M H VH 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm Responsive Soil Test Range Maintenance Range 50 ppm Bray P Soil Test (ppm) Upper Manure Limit Manure Management Range EX Environmental Risk Range 7

8 Corn P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Corn Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Corn Bray P Yield Goal (Bu) Yield Goal (Bu) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Removal Corn Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 50 + (Exp Yield 0.) + (Bray P -.5) + (Exp Yield Bray P -0.0) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Corn Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 7 + (Exp. Yield 0.) + (Exch K ) + (Exp Yield Exch K ) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Corn Recommendations 5 Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Corn Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0. lb P and 0.6 lb K O per bushel of harvested corn. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0. lb P /bu and 0.6 lb K O/bu). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

9 Wheat P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Wheat Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Wheat Bray P Yield Goal (Bu) Yield Goal (Bu) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Wheat Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 46 + (Yield Goal 0.4) + (Bray P.) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.0) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Wheat Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 6 + (Yield Goal 0.4) + (Exch K 0.48) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.008) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Wheat Recommendations 5 9 Removal Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Wheat Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0.50 lb P and 0.0 lb K O per bushel of harvested wheat. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0.50 lb P /bu and 0.0 lb K O/bu). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

10 Grain Sorghum P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Grain Sorghum Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Grain Sorghum Bray P Yield Goal (Bu) Yield Goal (Bu) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal G. Sorghum Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 50 + (0.6 Yield Goal) + (Bray P.5) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.008) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P G. Sorghum Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 80 + (0.7 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.66) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.00) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Grain Sorghum Recommendations 5 Removal Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Grain Sorghum Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0.40 lb P and 0.6 lb K O per bushel of harvested grain sorghum. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0.40 lb P /bu and 0.6 lb K O /bu). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs. 0

11 Soybean P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Soybeans Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Soybeans Bray P Yield Goal (Bu) Yield Goal (Bu) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Soybeans Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 56 + (0.5 Yield Goal) + (Bray P.8) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.057) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested (not in direct seed contact) If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Soybeans Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 60 + (0.68 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.46) + (Yield Goal x Exch K ) ] Removal If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested (not in direct seed contact) If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Soybeans Recommendations 5 Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Soybeans Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not place fertilizer in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0.80 lb P and.4 lb K O per bushel of harvested soybeans. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0.80 lb P /bu and.4 lb K O/bu). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

12 Sunflower P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Sunflower Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Sunflower Bray P Yield Goal (Lb) Yield Goal (Lb) Soil Test,000,500,000,500,000 Exch. K,000,500,000,500,000 (ppm) Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Sunfl ower Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 4 + (Yield Goal 0.0) + (Bray P.) + (Yield Goal Bray P ) ] Removal If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested (not in direct seed contact) If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Sunfl ower Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 80 + (Yield Goal 0.008) + (Exch K 0.6) + (Yield Goal Exch K ) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested (not in direct seed contact) If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build Sunflowers Recommendations 5 Bray P Yield (Lb) Yield (Lb) Yield (Lb) Soil Test,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Sunflowers Recommendations 5 Exch. K Yield (Lb) Yield (Lb) Yield (Lb) Soil Test,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not place fertilizer in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0.05 lb P and lb K O per pound of harvested sunfl ower. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0.05 lb P /lb and lb K O/lb). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

13 Oats P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Oats Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Oats Bray P Yield Goal (Bu) Yield Goal (Bu) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Oats Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 47 + (Yield Goal 0.5) + (Bray P.) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.0)] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Oats Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 6 + (Yield Goal 0.) + (Exch K 0.48) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.007)] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build Oats Recommendations 5 Removal Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Oats Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only 0.5 lb P and 0.0 lb K O per bushel of harvested oats. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (0.5 lb P /bu and 0.0 lb K O/bu). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

14 Corn Silage P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Corn Silage 4 Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Corn Silage Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Corn Silage Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 56 + (Yield Goal.) + (Bray P.8) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.056) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Corn Silage Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 74 + (Yield Goal.50) + (Exch K 0.567) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.05) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build Corn Silage Recommendations 5 Removal Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Corn Silage Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only. lb P and 8.7 lb K O per ton of harvested corn silage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (. lb P /ton and 8.7 lb K O/ton). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

15 Sorghum Silage P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Sorghum Silage 5 Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Sorghum Silage Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Removal Sorghum Silage Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 48 + (.9 Yield Goal) + (Bray P.8) + (Yield Goal Bray P ) ] If Bray P is greater than 0 ppm, then only a NP or NPKS starter fertilizer suggested If Bray P is less than 0 ppm, then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Sorghum Silage Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 7 + (.8 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.56) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.09) ] If Exch K is greater than 0 ppm then only a NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer is suggested If Exch K is less than 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Phosphorus Build Sorghum Silage Recommendations 5 Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Sorghum Silage Recommendations 5 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(0 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. Application of a NP, NPK or NPKS starter fertilizer may be benefi cial regardless of P or K soil test level, especially for cold/wet soil conditions and/or high surface crop residues. Do not exceed N + K O guidelines for fertilizer placed in direct seed contact. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only. lb P and 8.7 lb K O per ton of harvested sorghum silage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 4 Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields (. lb P / ton and 8.7 lb K O / ton). 5 Four, six and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs.

16 Brome and Fescue P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Brome/Fescue Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 44 + (6. Yield Goal) + (Bray P.) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.5) ] If Bray P > 0 ppm then basic P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 0 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Brome/Fescue Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 4 + (5.85 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.5) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.045) ] If Exch K > 0 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Removal P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 40 lb K O per ton of harvested forage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient New Brome and Fescue P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal New Brome/Fescue Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 68 + (. Yield Goal) + (Bray P.4) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.56) ] Removal If Bray P > 0 ppm then basic P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 0 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P New Brome/Fescue Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 9 + (5 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.7) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.6) ] If Exch K > 0 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 0 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. At low to very low soil test levels applying at least 5 to 50% of total as a band is recommended. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 40 lb K O per ton of harvested forage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 6

17 Bermuda Grass P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Bermuda Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Bermuda Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Exch. K Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Soil Test (ppm) Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Bermuda Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 64 + (5. Yield Goal) + (Bray P.56) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.) ] If Bray P > 5 ppm then basic P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 5 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Bermuda Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 75 + (6. 5 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.5) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.04) ] If Exch K > 50 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 50 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O Removal P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 40 lb K O per ton of harvested forage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient New Bermuda Grass P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Bermuda Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Bermuda Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Exch. K Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Removal Bermuda Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 64 + (9. Yield Goal) + (Bray P.56) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.65) ] If Bray P > 5 ppm then basic P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 5 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Bermuda Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 05 + (5 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.7) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.) ] If Exch K > 50 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 50 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 40 lb K O per ton of harvested forage. If crop removal exceeds nutrient 7

18 Alfalfa and Clover P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Alfalfa, 5 Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Alfalfa Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Exch. K Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb P Removal Alfalfa/Clover Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 7 + (4.56 Yield Goal) + (Bray P.9) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.8) ] If Bray P > 5 ppm then P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 5 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P Alfalfa/Clover Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 84 + (5.4 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.56) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.05) ] If Exch K > 50 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 50 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O, 4, 5 Phosphorus Build Alfalfa Recommendations 8 Removal Bray P Soil Test (ppm) - Lb P - Lb P - Lb P Potassium Build-Maintenance Alfalfa Recommendations,4 Exch. K Soil Test (ppm) - Lb K O - Lb K O - Lb K O Phosphorus Build-Maintenance Rec = {(5 Current P Soil Test) 8 } + P Removal In Potassium Build-Maintenance Rec = {(50 Current K Soil Test) 9 } + K O Removal In P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 60 lb K O per ton of harvested alfalfa or clover. If crop removal exceeds nutrient Recommended amounts of P and K O are based on crop nutrient removal at the indicated yields ( lb P / ton and 60 lb K O/ton). 4 Four, six, and eight year timeframes below are examples only. Build programs can be over longer timeframe, however, build-maintenance recommendations should not be less than crop suffi ciency based fertility programs. 5 Nitrogen fertilizer is not recommended, however, the amount of N supplied by common P fertilizers is not detrimental to alfalfa production

19 New Alfalfa and Clover P and K Recommendations Phosphorus Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Potassium Sufficiency Recommendations for Brome and Fescue Bray P Yield Goal (Ton) Yield Goal (Ton) Soil Test Exch. K (ppm) - Lb P (ppm) - Lb K O Removal Removal New Alfalfa/Clover Suffi ciency P Rec = [ 84 + ( Yield Goal) + (Bray P.7) + (Yield Goal Bray P 0.48) ] If Bray P > 5 ppm then basic P Recommendation = 0 If Bray P < 5 ppm then the minimum P Recommendation = 5 Lb P New Alfalfa/Clover Suffi ciency K Rec = [ 05 + (5 Yield Goal) + (Exch K 0.7) + (Yield Goal Exch K 0.) ] If Exch K > 50 ppm then basic K Recommendation = 0 If Exch K < 50 ppm then the minimum K Recommendation = 5 Lb K O P & K recommendations are for the total amount of broadcast and banded nutrients to be applied. removal numbers provided for comparitive purpose only lb P and 60 lb K O per ton of harvested alfalfa or clover. If crop removal exceeds nutrient For More Information For additonal information about nutrient management, see the following publications, available from your local K-State Research and Extension office, or on the World Wide Web at Best Management Practices for Phosphorous, MF- Chloride in Kansas: Plant, Soil, and Fertilizer Considerations, MF-570 Estimating Manure Nutrient Availability, MF-56 Phosphorus and Water Quality in Kansas, MF-46 Sulphur in Kansas, MF-64 Water Quality Protection: Best Management Practices for land, MF-46 9

20 Secondary and Micronutrients Chloride Wheat, Corn and Sorghum Chloride Profile Soil Chloride Recommendation ppm Lb Lb Cl < 4 < 0 0 Boron, > 6 > 45 0 Alfalfa, Corn, Sorghum and Soybeans Boron Recommendation DTPA Extr. B ppm Boron Recommendation Lb B < >.0 0 Recommendations are for southeast Kansas. Test is not well calibrated DO NOT BAND APPLY BORON Zinc Corn, Sorghum and Soybeans Zinc Recommendation Zn Rate, =.5 (.5 ppm DTPA Zn) If DTPA Zn >.0 ppm then Zn Rec = 0 If DTPA Zn <=.0 ppm then Minimum Zn Rec = Wheat, Sunflowers and Oats Zinc Recommendation Zn Rate = 0 Broadcast application intended to build Zn soil test level to non-responsive range and correct soil defi ciency for several years If applied as banded starter at planting, application of about lb Zn will correct crop defi ciency for that crop year. Soil defi ciency will likely remain. May desire to apply Zinc depending on incorporation opportunity in rotation Alfalfa, Brome, Fescue, Bermuda and Others Zn Recommendation Zn Rate = 0 Sulfur Wheat Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (0.6 Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Corn and Grain Sorghum Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (0. Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Corn and Forage Sorhum Silage Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (. Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Sunfl ower Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (0.005 Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Brome, Fescue & Bermuda Grass Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (5.0 Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Alfalfa Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (6.0 Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Soybean Sulfur Recommendation (Lb) = (0.4 Y Goal) (.5 % OM) Profi le Sulfur Other Sulfur Credits Default Profi le Sulfur = 5 lb S Dale F. Leikam Extension Specialist Nutrient Management Ray E. Lamond Extension Specialist Soil Fertility, Soil Testing Dave B. Mengel Head Department of Agronomy Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of sim i lar products not mentioned. Publications from Kansas State University are available on the World Wide Web at: Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, credit Dale F. Leikam, Ray E. Lamond, and David B. Mengel, Soil Test Interpretaions and Fertilizer Recommendations, Kan sas State Uni ver si ty, September 00 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Co op er a tive Ex ten sion Ser vice MF-586 September 00 It is the policy of Kansas State University Agricultural Ex per i ment Sta tion and Co op er a tive Extension Service that all per sons shall have equal op por tu ni ty and access to its ed u ca tion al programs, ser vic es, activities, and materials without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. Kan sas State University is an equal opportunity organization. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work, Acts of May 8 and June 0, 94, as amend ed. Kansas State Uni ver si ty, County Ex ten sion Councils, Extension Districts, and United States De part ment of Ag ri cul ture Co op erating, Marc A. Johnson, Director.

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results University of Missouri Extension G9111, Reviewed October 1, 1993 Editor's note: Use the XPLOR order form to purchase the printed version of this publication, which includes a sample soil test report. Using

More information

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009 Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009 Outline How to take a soil sample What is the appropriate depth for soil tests How many should you take How often

More information

Soil Fertility Management

Soil Fertility Management SFM-1 Revised April 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY H.J. PATTERSON HALL COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 PHONE (301) 405-1351 FAX (301) 314-2763 MCGRATHJ@UMD.EDU Soil Fertility Management AGRONOMIC CROP

More information

Update to Iowa phosphorus, potassium, and lime recommendations

Update to Iowa phosphorus, potassium, and lime recommendations 2013 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State University 137 Update to Iowa phosphorus, potassium, and lime recommendations Antonio P. Mallarino, professor and Extension soil fertility specialist,

More information

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Irrigated Spring Wheat Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide Irrigated Spring Wheat Brad Brown, Jeffrey Stark, and Dale Westermann These fertilizer guidelines are based on relationships established between University of Idaho soil

More information

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota Fertilizing corn in Minnesota : Nutrient Management : Agriculture : University of Minnes... Page 1 of 14 University of Minnesota Extension www.extension.umn.edu 612-624-1222 Nutrient Management Fertilizing

More information

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

OSU Soil Test Interpretations F-2225 SU Soil Test Interpretations Hailin Zhang Director, Soil, Water, and Forage Analytical Laboratory Bill Raun Soil Fertility Research Management Gordon Johnson Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

More information

Figure 3. Nutrient recommendation scheme for phosphorus and potassium.

Figure 3. Nutrient recommendation scheme for phosphorus and potassium. Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) Recommendations: Response of crops to additions of P and K is a continuous function. When inadequate amounts are present in the soil, crops respond to P and K additions

More information

WQ221 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests...

WQ221 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests... 1 of 9 2/1/2010 11:26 AM University of Missouri Extension WQ221, Reviewed January 2009 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests Charles D. Fulhage and Donald L. Pfost Department

More information

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training George Silva - silvag@msu.edu Eaton, Ingham, Barry and Livingston Counties 17 Essential Plant

More information

Do not oven-dry the soil

Do not oven-dry the soil Fertilizing Corn Fact Sheet No..38 Crop Series Soil by J.G. Davis and D.G. Westfall* Adequate soil fertility is one of the requirements for profitable corn production. Nitrogen (N) is the most yield-limiting

More information

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

OSU Soil Test Interpretations klahoma Cooperative Extension Service PSS-2225 SU Soil Test Interpretations Hailin Zhang Director, Soil, Water, and Forage Analytical Laboratory Bill Raun Soil Fertility Research Brian Arnall Nutrient

More information

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO With High Fertilizer Prices Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO 573 243 3581 Good fertility = Good Pastures = Good Crops Know where you are..soil Test What Nutrients Do Plants Require?

More information

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota George Rehm, Nutrient Management Specialist Gyles Randall, Soil scientist, Southern Research and Outreach Center John Lamb, Nutrient Management Specialist Roger Eliason, Director,

More information

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO Pasture Management- Fertility Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO Goals of Pasture Fertility To establish and maintain desired species Requirements and application timing of some nutrients

More information

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE www.wardlab.com Purposes of Soil Quality Employ new & modified crop management systems Increase efficiency

More information

Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby

Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby With Cooperation Of: Dorivar Ruiz Diaz, Associate Professor,

More information

Clovers.. 75 pounds of "N" per acre

Clovers.. 75 pounds of N per acre Fertilizer Guideline by Don "Moe" Moeller, Sales Agronomist Much of the contained information is from the "WARDguide" NITROGEN. (N) Estimated amounts of Nitrogen available from past legume plants: Alfalfa..

More information

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Nutrient Removal by Crops Nutrient Removal by Crops REMOVAL OF PLANT NUTRIENTS BY CEREALS AND FEED GRAINS (LBS. PER BUSHEL) CROP YIELD Nitrogen P2O5 K2O Calcium Magnesium Sulfur Corn Total 1.50 0.60 1.30 0.21 0.20 0.16 Stover 0.50

More information

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops Crop Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops Table of Contents Page Alfalfa... 3D-1 Corn Silage... 3D-5 Grass/Alfalfa Mixtures... 3D-8 Grass/Clover Pastures... 3D-11 Sorghum Silage... 3D-15

More information

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. (Acre) CODE 590

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. (Acre) CODE 590 590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (Acre) CODE 590 DEFINITION Managing the amount, source, placement, form, and timing of the application of

More information

Soil Fertility Management Under Tight Crop Production Margins. John Sawyer Antonio Mallarino Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Soil Fertility Management Under Tight Crop Production Margins. John Sawyer Antonio Mallarino Department of Agronomy Iowa State University Soil Fertility Management Under Tight Crop Production Margins John Sawyer Antonio Mallarino Department of Agronomy Iowa State University Nitrogen Application Almost Always Needed To Increase Corn Yields

More information

Soil Fertility Briefs. Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison

Soil Fertility Briefs. Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison Soil Fertility Briefs Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison Using the remote responders Push button corresponding to your answer When green light flashes

More information

For Agronomic Crops. Fertilizer Recommendations. In Minnesota. George Rehm and Michael Schmitt . AG-MI MN 2500 AGMI (U.

For Agronomic Crops. Fertilizer Recommendations. In Minnesota. George Rehm and Michael Schmitt . AG-MI MN 2500 AGMI (U. '-\ ~~. ; --~':#)/'\/ :~~:. AG-MI-391. MN 25 AGMI- 199. 391 (U.~9) MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AGRICULTURE. / Fertilizer Recommendations For Agronomic Crops In Minnesota by George

More information

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017 Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Program Pennsylvania's Nutrient Management Act (Act 38, 2005) Introduction

More information

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application Quirine M. Ketterings Cornell University Nutrient Management Spear Program http://nmsp.cals.cornell.edu Acidity and ph Acidity = H + and Al 3+

More information

DRYLAND WINTER WHEAT: EASTERN WASHINGTON NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT GUIDE

DRYLAND WINTER WHEAT: EASTERN WASHINGTON NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT GUIDE DRYLAND WINTER WHEAT: EASTERN WASHINGTON NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT GUIDE By Richard T. Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman

More information

Fertility Management for Wheat Production Lucas Haag, Ph.D., Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center Colby, Kansas

Fertility Management for Wheat Production Lucas Haag, Ph.D., Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center Colby, Kansas Fertility Management for Wheat Production Lucas Haag, Ph.D., Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center Colby, Kansas Where are we now? Historical and Current Price Ratios Understanding

More information

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AG-FO-3790-D (REVISED 2016) Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota Daniel E. Kaiser 1, Fabian Fernandez 1, John A. Lamb 1, Jeffrey A. Coulter 2, and Brian Barber 3 1/ Extension Specialist in

More information

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln G02-1460 Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients Jurg M. Blumenthal Donald H. Sander Nebraska

More information

Chapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives

Chapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software learning objectives Identify information required to use the Alberta Farm Fertilizer Information and Recommendation Manager (AFFIRM). Identify information required to use

More information

GROWERS GUIDE. to Soil Health.

GROWERS GUIDE. to Soil Health. GROWERS GUIDE to Soil Health www.arrowseed.com Feed Your Soil One percent organic matter contains about 1,200 pounds of nitrogen, 345 pounds of phosphorus and 150 pounds of sulfur per acre. Dr. Ray Ward,

More information

Fertilizing and Liming Forage Crops 1

Fertilizing and Liming Forage Crops 1 SS-AGR-176 Fertilizing and Liming Forage Crops 1 Y.C. Newman, C. Mackowiak, R. Mylavaparu, and M. Silveira 2 Plants require many essential nutrients for growth. Those nutrients required by plants in large

More information

North Dakota Fertilizer Recommendation Tables and Equations

North Dakota Fertilizer Recommendation Tables and Equations SF882 (Revised) North Dakota Fertilizer Recommendation Tables and Equations D.W. Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist The following soil test recommendation tables are based on field research data obtained

More information

Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans

Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans The Manure Management Plan (MMP) must include manure application rates for

More information

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension Soil Fertility and Forage Availability Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension Outline Introduction Soil Testing Fertilizer Application Saving Money on Fertilizer Introduction

More information

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FO 0792 F (REVISED 2016) Understanding Phosphorus in Minnesota Soils Paulo H. Pagliari, Daniel E. Kaiser, Carl J. Rosen, and John A. Lamb: Extension Specialists in Nutrient Management

More information

UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1

UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1 SL129 UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1 R. Mylavarapu, D. Wright, and G. Kidder 2 Introduction This publication presents in abbreviated form the fertilization recommendations

More information

LIQUIDS WORKSHEET 2 - NUTRIENT BALANCE Modified January 14, 2014

LIQUIDS WORKSHEET 2 - NUTRIENT BALANCE Modified January 14, 2014 LIQUIDS WORKSHEET 2 - NUTRIENT BALANCE Modified January 14, 2014 Tract Field No. Acres Soil Test P Value (Mehlich 3) Step 1. Crop or Crop Sequence/Rotation See Table 2.1 Options Step 2. Step 3. Realistic

More information

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p. Things to Know Nutrient Management Chapter 16 p. 669-739 Goals of fertilizer use General concept of plant nutrient needs Fertilizer grades (e.g., 10-10-10) Fertilizer characteristics Application methods

More information

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. Nutrient Management. (Acre) Code 590

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. Nutrient Management. (Acre) Code 590 590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD Nutrient Management (Acre) Code 590 DEFINITION Managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the application of

More information

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations Len Kryzanowski, P.Ag. Director, Environmental Strategy and Research Environmental Stewardship Branch Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Key Messages

More information

Soil Test Advanced. Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013

Soil Test Advanced. Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013 Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013 Soil Test Advanced Tom Bruulsema, PhD, CCA Director, Northeast Region, North America Program Formed in 2007 from the Potash

More information

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010 Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010 by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist and Kathrin Olson-Rutz research associate clainj@montana.edu;

More information

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison/UW-Extension, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706/608-262-0485 November 2008 Issue #4 2008 Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment Carrie Laboski

More information

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Soil fertility is one of the primary yield building components of small grain management. A properly managed fertility program, including recommended fertilization and liming

More information

Institute of Ag Professionals

Institute of Ag Professionals Institute of Ag Professionals Proceedings of the 2013 Crop Pest Management Shortcourse & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show www.extension.umn.edu/agprofessionals Do not reproduce

More information

Determining nutrient needs

Determining nutrient needs A3340 Corn fertilization L.G. Bundy Profitable corn production requires an adequate soil fertility program. Insufficient nutrients will lower yields; excess nutrients will lower profit margins and may

More information

Number 146 June 27, 2008

Number 146 June 27, 2008 Number 146 June 27, 2008 1. Yield prospects for various doublecrop options 1 2. Herbicide carryover considerations when doublecropping after wheat 4 3. Doublecropping options in northwest and northcentral

More information

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay July 2009 Agdex 127/541-2 Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay Timothy has a relatively high demand for nutrients. Under excellent moisture conditions or irrigation and when supplied with

More information

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops Westi Ag Days, Worland, Wyoming February 4, 2009 Jay Norton, Soil Fertility Specialist Renewable Resources Department University of Wyoming 307-766

More information

LAND APPLICATION OF DAIRY MANURE

LAND APPLICATION OF DAIRY MANURE CHAPTER 5 LAND APPLICATION OF DAIRY MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of dairy manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key steps

More information

Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation

Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation University of Missouri Extension WQ278, Reviewed January 2009 Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation Paul Tracy and S.G. Hefner Department

More information

Irrigated Pastures. Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide. Introduction. Nutrient Distribution and Cycling in Grazed Pastures

Irrigated Pastures. Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide. Introduction. Nutrient Distribution and Cycling in Grazed Pastures CIS 392 Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide Irrigated Pastures by Glenn E. Shewmaker, Jason W. Ellsworth, and Scott Jensen Introduction Pastures of perennial forage grasses and legumes can be largely sustainable

More information

LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE

LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of poultry manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key

More information

National Sunflower Association of Canada Inc.

National Sunflower Association of Canada Inc. National Sunflower Association of Canada Inc. Nutritional Needs of Sunflower CROP DEVELOPMENT General Ensuring the fertility needs of the crop are met is critical to maximize yield and profit. Improper

More information

Nutrient Removal Values for Major Agronomic Crops in Missouri Update for 2008 Manjula V. Nathan, Yichang Sun, and David Dunn

Nutrient Removal Values for Major Agronomic Crops in Missouri Update for 2008 Manjula V. Nathan, Yichang Sun, and David Dunn Introduction: Nutrient Removal Values for Major Agronomic Crops in Missouri Update for 2008 Manjula V. Nathan, Yichang Sun, and David Dunn Currently the soil Fertility Group is working on revising the

More information

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect DAVE MENGEL SOIL FERTILITY A ND CROP PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Some Important Facts About Kansas

More information

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture PNW511 Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture By Craig Cogger, Extension Soil Scientist, WSU-Puyallup and Dan Sullivan, Extension Soil Scientist, Oregon State University Overview

More information

Recommendations in this nutrient management

Recommendations in this nutrient management NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT EM 8943-E November 2007 Irrigated and Dryland Canola D.J. Wysocki, M. Corp, D.A. Horneck, and L.K. Lutcher Recommendations in this nutrient management guide apply to spring or winter

More information

Editor: Robert Waggener

Editor: Robert Waggener Cooperative Extension Service College of Agriculture B-116R June 25 Editor: Robert Waggener Issued in furtherance of cooperative extension work, acts of May 8 and June 3, 1914, in cooperation with the

More information

UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1

UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1 SL19 UF/IFAS Standardized Fertilization Recommendations for Agronomic Crops 1 G. Kidder, C.G. Chambliss, and R. Mylavarapu Introduction This publication presents in abbreviated form the fertilization recommendations

More information

Clain Jones

Clain Jones FERTILIZER TIMING AND PLACEMENT Extension Agent Agronomy College September 24, 2014 Clain Jones clainj@montana.edu 994-6076 MSU Soil Fertility Extension Goal Describe optimal fertilization timing and placement

More information

A December 18, 2007 article (printed below) from South Dakota State University on the Plant Management Network web site addresses this issue.

A December 18, 2007 article (printed below) from South Dakota State University on the Plant Management Network web site addresses this issue. Number 122 January 18, 2008 1. Surface applications of nitrogen on snow-covered fields of wheat 1 2. Chloride as a fertilizer nutrient for wheat 2 3. Reducing phosphorus movement into surface water: Eutrophication

More information

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011 Fertility and Crop Nutrition B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011 900 800 Fertilizer costs: 1960-2010 Source: USDA 700 600 Nitrogen solutions (30%)

More information

Making rational adjustments to phosphorus, potassium, and lime application rates when crop prices are low and producers want to cut inputs

Making rational adjustments to phosphorus, potassium, and lime application rates when crop prices are low and producers want to cut inputs 2015 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State University 149 Making rational adjustments to phosphorus, potassium, and lime application rates when crop prices are low and producers want to cut

More information

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production 2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production Daniel H. Poston February 25, 2016 Things That Drive Soybean Yield Light (Temperature) Nutrition Water (Drainage) Pest management What do

More information

FACT SHEET. Manure Analysis And Interpretations

FACT SHEET. Manure Analysis And Interpretations FACT SHEET Manure Analysis And Interpretations Manure is a co-product of animal agriculture. Depending on the point of view, it is either a resource for crop production or it is a waste product of the

More information

Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals

Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals Edward B. Rayburn, Extension Specialist WVU Extension Service, Agriculture and Natural Resources March 2008 1 Fertilizer recommendations from a

More information

LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE

LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of swine manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key steps

More information

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup Soil Testing and Nutrient Management Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup Soil Testing Nutrients Soil Quality Contaminants Biological Simple Soil Quality Tests Texture Structure Color Texture: Proportions

More information

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops Dr. Tom Thompson Dept. of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science Presented at 14 th Annual Desert Crops Workshop Holtville, CA 3 December, 2003 Objectives of Nutrient

More information

For over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means

For over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means Part I Agronomic Crops 65 9 Soil Testing and Nutrient Recommendations Gary W. Hergert UNL Professor of Agronomy For over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means of predicting the kind and amount

More information

SF723 (Revised) Barley

SF723 (Revised) Barley SF723 (Revised) Fertilizing Malting and Feed Barley D.W. Franzen Extension Soil Science Specialist R.J. Goos Professor Soil Science Department Barley has been an important cash and rotational crop in North

More information

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET FERTILIZING SUGARBEET NITROGEN & QUALITY: Sugarbeet quality is dependent on the sucrose content in the roots and the level of impurities that must be removed during sugar refining. Production of high quality

More information

General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1

General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1 SL1 General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1 J.B. Sartain In many neighborhoods, people envy the individual with the most beautiful lawn and think they cannot grow a

More information

Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing. Bill Kreuser University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing. Bill Kreuser University of Nebraska-Lincoln Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing Bill Kreuser University of NebraskaLincoln Why Do We Soil Test? Estimate plant available nutrients Monitor changes in soil nutrients Peace of Mind Emphasis on Available

More information

SAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan

SAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan SAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan General Overall, the nutrient management plan for the farm includes these components: 1) use of poultry litter when soil phosphorus (P) content and timing of application

More information

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA B E S T M A N AG E M E N T P R AC T I C E S F O R N I T R O G E N A P P L I C AT I O N Best Management Practices

More information

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison Fertilizer Management Considerations for 2008 Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison Fertilizer Price Overview Fertilizer prices have increased significantly over the past six months and are

More information

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization of Corn

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization of Corn Publication 424-027 Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization of Corn M. M. Alley, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist Marvin E. Martz, Jr., Former Graduate Research Assistant Paul H. Davis, Extension Agent,

More information

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing Rocky Lemus Extension Forage Specialist Visit us at http://msucares.com/crops/forages/index.html As the fall approaches, many

More information

Fertility Management of Soybeans

Fertility Management of Soybeans Fertility Management of Soybeans Gyles Randall Soil Scientist and Emeritus Professor, Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center Waseca, MN 56093-4521 grandall@umn.edu Abstract Providing

More information

By-Step Nutrient Management Plan May 23, Jim Crownover, Conservation Agronomist USDA-NRCS Lubbock, Texas

By-Step Nutrient Management Plan May 23, Jim Crownover, Conservation Agronomist USDA-NRCS Lubbock, Texas Step-By By-Step Nutrient Management Plan May 23, 2001 Jim Crownover, Conservation Agronomist USDA-NRCS Lubbock, Texas Objectives: Learn how to prepare a Nutrient Management Plan Review an example of a

More information

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1 SS-AGR-194 1 David Wright, I. Small, and Nick Dufault 2 Cotton production and management requires much planning and timely action throughout the season. Preparation for planting cotton can be done by strip-tilling

More information

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE Steve Culman (and many, many others) Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources culman.2@osu.edu soilfertility.osu.edu Tri-State Recommendations Originally

More information

Nutrient Recommendations for Field Crops in Vermont

Nutrient Recommendations for Field Crops in Vermont Nutrient Recommendations for Field Crops in Vermont Revised March 208 This 208 publication, of Nutrient Recommendations for Fields Crops in Vermont (BR 390.2), is a revision of the 2004 publication, Nutrient

More information

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Number 209 September 11, 2009 Number 209 September 11, 2009 1. Preplant and planting time fertilizer decisions for wheat 1 2. Adjusting wheat seeding rates for unfavorable conditions 3 3. The importance of fall tillers in wheat yields

More information

Fertilizer Recommendations for S.D. Crops

Fertilizer Recommendations for S.D. Crops South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 2-1954 Fertilizer Recommendations for S.D.

More information

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist clainj@montana.edu; 406 994-6076 http://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility Sweet Grass County

More information

Nutrient Management Considerations in a High Cost. Carrie Laboski Dep. Soil Science, UW-Madison

Nutrient Management Considerations in a High Cost. Carrie Laboski Dep. Soil Science, UW-Madison Nutrient Management Considerations in a High Cost Environment Carrie Laboski Dep. Soil Science, UW-Madison Fertilizer Prices Avg. of 7 to 12 Wisconsin vendors Average Midwest Fertilizer Price 1988 to 2008

More information

Sampling Soil and Crop Tissue

Sampling Soil and Crop Tissue Conventional Soil Sampling CHAPTER 7d Sampling Soil and Crop Tissue James J. Camberato Soil Sampling and Analysis Conventional soil sampling prior to land application of animal manures is required by DHEC

More information

Cool Season Grass Establishment. Doug Shoup Southeast Area Agronomist

Cool Season Grass Establishment. Doug Shoup Southeast Area Agronomist Cool Season Grass Establishment Doug Shoup Southeast Area Agronomist Introduction Smooth Brome and tall fescue are important cool season grasses for eastern Kansas Well adapted High production Quality

More information

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. ) Site-Specificc Nutrient Management For Nutrient Management Planning To Improve Crop Production, Environ nmental Quality, and Economic Return Presentationn Script: Overview - Chapter 1 Written By: Agustin

More information

Permanent Pastures For Delaware

Permanent Pastures For Delaware Revision Date: 9/1/1998 Richard Barczewski, PhD Animal Scientist Richard W Taylor, PhD Extension Specialist III AF-10 Permanent Pastures For Delaware Pasture, like any other crop, must be properly managed

More information

Agricultural Lime Recommendations Based on Lime Quality

Agricultural Lime Recommendations Based on Lime Quality ID-163 Agricultural Lime Recommendations Based on Lime Quality University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Cooperative Extension Service E.L. Ritchey, L.W. Murdock, D. Ditsch, and

More information

Soil Testing and Using Fertilization Recommendations Age: years old (grades 5-6), but can be adapted for all youth 5-19 (grades K-12)

Soil Testing and Using Fertilization Recommendations Age: years old (grades 5-6), but can be adapted for all youth 5-19 (grades K-12) Soil Testing and Using Fertilization Recommendations Age: 10-12 years old (grades 5-6), but can be adapted for all youth 5-19 (grades K-12) Objectives: 1. Members/students should be able to take a representative

More information

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team 2 Take Home Points Fertilizer placement is the main tool to manage crop fertility in reduced tillage systems

More information

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2 Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2 With high nitrogen (N) prices, it is essential that producers get the most out of every pound (lb) of N applied.

More information

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Cropping System Nutrient Management Cropping System Nutrient Management A Crop Advisor and Extension Specialist View Chris Snip Crop Sales Specialist Agris Co-op Cottam Jake Munroe Soil Fertility Specialist Field Crops OMAFRA Stratford Goals

More information