Findings from the Arizona Water Meter

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Findings from the Arizona Water Meter"

Daniel Parsons
6 years ago
Views:

1 Findings from the Arizona Water Meter Water Resources Research Center, Univ. of AZ November 17, 2010 Drew Beckwith, Water Policy Analyst (720)

2 Arizona Water Meter What 15 communities 7 criteria 1) Per capita use and trends 2) Water rate structures 3) Conservation measures 4) Ordinances 5) Funding 6) Water loss 7) Effluent use 2

3 Arizona Water Meter Why Expansion of WRA water program Assess state of the state Conservation as a viable alternative Learn from others = everyone benefits Recognize good programs 3

4 Arizona Water Meter How Survey pre-population w. ADWR data Provider review City summary compilation Provider review City summaries are the database (App B) 4

5 Buckeye Chandler Mesa Peoria Phoenix Scottsdale Casa Grande (AWC) Participating Entities Variation w.r.t. size, location, ownership, demographics, a nd regulatory program Tucson Sierra Vista (AWC) Safford Payson Clarkdale Prescott Lake Havasu City Yuma 5

6 1) SFR Per Capita Use Buckeye Payson Clarkdale Prescott Casa Grande (AWC) Tucson Sierra Vista (AWC) Phoenix Lake Havasu City Peoria Mesa Chandler Yuma Safford Scottsdale

Clarkdale Peoria Yuma -7.9% Scottsdale 19.0% 18.0% 16.5% 14.2% 12.

7 1) System-Wide Trend Buckeye Casa Grande (AWC) Prescott Safford Lake Havasu City Tucson Phoenix Sierra Vista (AWC) Chandler Mesa Payson Clarkdale Peoria Yuma -7.9% Scottsdale 19.0% 18.0% 16.5% 14.2% 12.1% 12.0% 11.5% 9.5% 8.9% 8.0% 6.5% 1.5% 1.0% 77.0% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 7

8 2) Marginal Price 8

9 2) Average Price 9

10 3) Public Awareness Measures 10

11 3) Conservation Measure Count Scottsdale Tucson Peoria Payson Sierra Vista (AWC) Chandler Prescott Phoenix Mesa Lake Havasu City Buckeye Casa Grande (AWC) Safford Clarkdale Yuma

12 3) Conservation Assessment Phoenix Chandler Prescott Scottsdale Peoria Tucson Casa Grande (AWC) Buckeye Mesa Payson Yuma Lake Havasu City Clarkdale Sierra Vista (AWC) Safford

13 3) Conservation Measures Most popular Messaging and Youth Education (14 of 15) Events and Audits (2/3 rds ) Mid-range HET rebates Landscape conversion incentives Underutilized ICI measures Large landscape incentives 13

14 4) Ordinance Chart 14

4) Ordinances Water Intensive Landscaping Limitations Landscape Watering Restrictions Other Examples: Planting new turf and expansion of existing turf

15 4) Ordinances Water Intensive Landscaping Limitations Landscape Watering Restrictions Other Examples: Planting new turf and expansion of existing turf areas is prohibited (Payson) Golf course developments must generate a sufficient amount of effluent to meet irrigation needs of the golf course (Clarkdale) 15

16 5) Funding Payson Scottsdale Prescott Peoria Chandler Tucson Safford Lake Havasu City Phoenix Clarkdale Buckeye Mesa Yuma Sierra Vista (AWC) Casa Grande (AWC) $1.90 $1.77 $1.37 $1.32 $1.30 $1.17 $1.07 $1.05 $0.56 $0.02 $- $- $2.98 $4.28 $7.07 $- $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $

Payson Tucson Safford Lake Havasu City 0.4% 2.5% 5.1% 6.3% 6.

17 6) Water Loss Clarkdale Peoria Phoenix Sierra Vista (AWC) Buckeye Scottsdale Mesa Casa Grande (AWC) Prescott Chandler Yuma Payson Tucson Safford Lake Havasu City 0.4% 2.5% 5.1% 6.3% 6.8% 7.0% 7.4% 7.5% 7.7% 8.6% 9.0% 9.4% 11.9% 16.0% 18.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 17

18 6) Water Loss ADWR 10% standard Leak detection Meter replacement Apparent lack of systematic accounting E.g. AWWA/IWA Water Loss Methodology Notable exception Peoria 18

19 7) Effluent Use 10 of 15 put 95% to use Direct Use irrigation, process water Recharge Exchange Regional partnership (SROG) 60,000 AF to Palo Verde 19

20 Scoring Consistent and transparent snapshot 1) Per capita: SFR and system-wide trend 2) Rate structures: avg. price and thresholds 3) Conservation measures and assessment 4) Ordinances 5) Funding 6) Water loss 7) Effluent use 20

2003 12 points if use decreased 5-10% 9 points if use decreased 0-4%

21 Scoring SW Trend System Wide Potable Per Capita Trend 15 points if adjusted 2008 system wide potable use decreased 10% or more since points if use decreased 5-10% 9 points if use decreased 0-4% 6 points if use increased 0-15% 3 points if use increased more than 15% 21

22 Scoring Cons. Measures Number of Measures (8 points max) 0.25 points for each specific conservation measure Assessment of measures (7 points max) 0.50 points for each assessment of a conservation measure 22

23 Water Loss Scoring Water Loss 10 points for the city with the lowest water loss in 2008, each subsequent city receives one less point 1 point guaranteed if water loss is less than 10% 0 points if water loss is greater than 10% 23

24 Tucson Snapshot 24

25 Mesa Snapshot 25

26 Overall Scoring 26

27 Top Drop Awards Oct. 14 th Desert Botanical Gardens Publically recognize leaders Prescott, Tucson/Phoenix, Payson Karin Sheldon President, WRA Ilene Grossman Conservation Program Manager, Tucson Water 27

28 Take Home Messages AZ water providers are doing good work Room for improvement Report is a database Learn from each other WRA will be here to help Water conservation is an excellent tool for increasing water supplies 28

29 Questions & Comments The Arizona Water Meter is available at: Drew Beckwith (720)

This presentation premiered at WaterSmart Innovations 2010 Join us this fall in Las Vegas, October, watersmartinnovations.

This presentation premiered at WaterSmart Innovations 2010 Join us this fall in Las Vegas, October, 2011 watersmartinnovations.com Arizona Water Meter: A Comparison of Water Conservation Programs in 15