PRIORITIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT FOR RAIL SAFETY PROJECTS: A CORRIDOR-LEVEL APPROACH
|
|
- Daniella Hutchinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani PRIORITIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT FOR RAIL SAFETY PROJECTS: A CORRIDOR-LEVEL APPROACH Johnny R Arellano Moffatt & Nichol Fifth Avenue, th Floor, New York, NY 00 Tel: --; jrarellano@moffattnichol.com Amy Mindick-Walling, PE Moffatt & Nichol 00 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 00, Raleigh, NC 0 Tel: --; amindick-walling@moffattnichol.com Andrew Thomas, PE NCDOT Rail Division Mail Service Road (MAIL), Raleigh, NC Tel: --; dthomas@ncdot.com Ali Z. Rezvani, PhD Moffatt & Nichol Fifth Avenue, th Floor, New York, NY 00 Tel: --; arezvani@moffattnichol.com Word count:, + table/ figures x 0 words (each) =,0 November 0
2 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani 0 ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Rail Division s efforts in developing a methodology for prioritizing safety improvement projects for highway-rail atgrade crossings at the corridor-level. The goal is to optimize the use of limited funding to improve rail system reliability. By leveraging previous research which identifies and prioritizes individual projects using procedures such as benefit cost analysis, this approach aims to improve project selection by focusing on freight corridors rather than individual crossings. The proposed approach defines a metric that relates system reliability to crossing safety. It then uses binary programming to select an optimal set of safety improvement actions which maximize the improvement in system reliability. The defined framework can be expanded beyond crossing safety to include a more diverse set of projects and help decision makers with selecting projects that maximize overall system improvement. Keywords: Rail; Corridor; Safety; Prioritization; Optimization, System Reliability; Infrastructure; Investment
3 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani INTRODUCTION The continuous investment in the United States transportation infrastructure network is an essential part of its economy and future growth. The United States heavily invested in infrastructure for all modes of transportation over the past two-centuries, but in the last few decades has failed to allocate sufficient funding for the maintenance of this infrastructure. The shortage in maintenance funding necessitates for different approaches aimed towards the allocation of available funds. () At the state level, North Carolina has implemented a data-driven prioritization program for more efficiently and effectively using its funding in improving infrastructure known as the Strategic Transportation Investment (STI) Program. At the federal level, there are various government programs that have begun to award funding to infrastructure projects that contribute to the improvement of the United States transportation network, such as the Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for the Long-term Achievement of National Efficiencies (FASTLANE) program and the Transportation Infrastructure Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant. FASTLANE will award $. billion between 0 and 00 to selected freight and highway projects that address transportation system challenges such as the improvement of safety and reliability of the movement of freight (). Meanwhile, TIGER Grant will award $00 million in 0 to projects that improve transportation reliability and safety, and generate economic development (). FASTLANE, TIGER and other sources of funding usually have a set of requirements for projects in terms of viability and benefit they bring to the general public. Although these programs have guidelines to evaluate individual projects in terms of their costs and benefits to society, they do not investigate the benefits of combining multiple projects (i.e. multiple rail projects along a corridor). While the current approaches generate solid outcomes in term of the benefit to cost ratio of public expenditure, looking at individual projects independently could lead to less than optimal decisions in improving overall system efficiency. This paper proposes a framework for prioritizing highway-rail at-grade crossing safety improvement projects, from a set of feasible projects with benefit to cost ratios greater than one, with a goal of maximizing system efficiency while adhering to budgetary constraints. Furthermore, this paper extends prior crossing centric research () into a corridor-level approach. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Problem Statement further explains the problem that this research is addressing. Methodology proposes a safety related metric that can be used as a medium for measuring system reliability and uses it for optimizing safety improvement actions. Potential Number of Crashes per Corridor provides guidance on how to calculate the potential number of crashes on a corridor. Corridor Closure Time expands the calculation for number of crashes into expected corridor closure time. Total Train Delay Time uses the closure time to estimate delay times at corridor-level. Prioritization of Projects illustrates the use of the defined metric for prioritizing safety projects. Conclusion and Future Work discusses conclusions and future work. PROBLEM STATEMENT The NCDOT s Comprehensive State Rail Plan (State Plan) aims, amongst other goals, to analyze and prioritize rail corridors, rail programs and proposed projects (). In its State Plan, North Carolina identifies a total of rail corridors. Improving the combined performance of these corridors through the prioritization of safety improvement actions is the basis of this study. A freight rail corridor provides connectivity between two or more inland points enabling a frequent flow of cargo. Cargo flow performance metrics normally measure transportation costs, transportation time, and transportation reliability. Safety improvement projects, generally, do not have a major impact on transportation costs or time, however, they do impact transportation reliability and, consequently, impact system fluidity by reducing unplanned delays caused by crashes. Therefore, total unplanned delay times can be used as a means to calculate system reliability. This study expands previous efforts and processes developed by NCDOT in the development of a prioritization approach for improving highway-rail at-grade crossings. The input to this approach is a list of feasible at-grade crossing safety improvement projects, which is the typical output of a benefit-cost
4 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani analysis study. The proposed corridor-level prioritization approach seeks to improve the overall reliability and fluidity of the system by minimizing system-wide train delays caused by highway-rail crashes, by selecting the optimal safety improvement actions, under budget constraints. METHODOLOGY The primary challenge in developing a corridor-level prioritization approach is defining a performance metric that relates crossing safety to system reliability. As mentioned earlier, crashes at highway-rail atgrade crossings lead to a decrease in system reliability by causing unplanned delays. Hence, any action that leads to a reduction in unplanned delays will also lead to an improvement in system reliability. Unplanned corridor-level delays depend on (a) frequency of crashes and (b) severity of crashes. At the same level of severity, corridors with a higher number of crashes are expected to have higher unplanned delays. Similarly, at the same frequency of crashes, corridors with a higher representation of severe crashes tend to have higher unplanned delays dues to longer closure times of crossings. The proposed methodology estimates future unplanned corridor-level delays by estimating the likelihood of crashes and their severity levels on different corridors. It then provides a binary programming model to select the optimal set of safety improvement actions that maximize the reduction in unplanned delay. Potential Number of Crashes per Corridor The frequency of crashes on a freight rail corridor depends both on the number of crossings on that corridor and the likelihood of having a crash on its individual crossings. The probability of a crash happening on an individual crossing, as discussed by Ogden (), depends on multiple factors including highway traffic, train speed, etc. For a corridor with n total crossings, the chance of having m crashes (CP m n ) is calculated as follows: n CP m n = ( P ) ( i ) i P ( P ) ( i ) i P ( P n ) ( i n ) i P n n i j = m () i =0 i =0 i n =0 j= Where: CP m n : Probability of having m crashes on a corridor with n crossings. P i : Probability of having a crash on crossing i. The computational complexity of equation () exponentially increases as the number of crossings and crashes increase, which makes probability calculations extremely time consuming for larger corridors. For example, there are only possible crash combinations for a corridor with crossings that experiences two crashes. However, there are, possible combinations for a corridor with 0 crossings that experiences the same number of crashes. Therefore, the proposed approach uses an estimation for the formula in the above equation to measure the probability of having m crashes on a corridor with n crossings. The maximum average error between the actual and estimated probabilities was calculated to be less than 0.% for all corridors. The estimate equation is defined as follows: CP m n = ( n m ) P acc m ( P acc ) n m () Where: P acc = n i= P i n = average corridor crash probability Using the defined metric, different corridors can be compared in terms of number of crashes. Figure maps NCDOT s rail system and highlights three selected corridors: corridor, corridor, and corridor. For the remainder of this paper, these three corridors will be used for illustrating various calculations and comparing their results.
5 Cumulative Probability Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani 0 FIGURE Map of selected rail corridors. Figure shows that corridor has approximately a % chance of experiencing one crash or less next year while corridor has only an % chance. It could also be inferred from Figure that corridor has approximately a % chance of experiencing seven crashes or less next year. Therefore, corridor has a higher chance of experiencing a crash and consequent delays, which will be calculated further in the following sections, than corridor or. 00% 0% 0% 0% 0% Number of Crashes % FIGURE Corridor Crash CDF. Corridor Closure Time To identify the expected closure time of a corridor, it is necessary to estimate closure likelihood and duration. Closure duration depends both on the frequency of crashes and their severity. According to NCDOT assumption based on the findings of NCHRP Report (), in the occurrence of an at-grade crossing crash, the crossing will be closed to rail traffic for an average of minutes for fatal crashes, and it would be closed for minutes for injury or property damage only crashes. Using these assumptions, the total closure time of a crossing can be calculated for all potential crash outcomes (Table ). Table shows that having one crash with zero fatalities will lead to an average closure time of minutes while having two crashes with one fatality will lead to an average closure time of minutes.
6 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani TABLE Closure time matrix (minutes). Number of Crashes Number of Fatalities ,,0,,0 00,0,0,0,0,,,,,,0,,,,0,0,,,0,,,,,, 0 0,0,,,,,0,,,,0 The likelihood of any given closure time (Table ) can be estimated by calculating the probability of crashes and fatalities. Therefore, it is necessary to first calculate the probability of any number of fatal crashes based on the total number of crashes. For a given m number of crashes, the probability of having k fatalities is calculated as follows: FP k m = ( Pf ) ( i) i Pf ( Pf ) ( i) i Pf ( Pf m ) ( m) i Pf m i j = k () i =0 i =0 i m =0 Where: FP k m Probability of having k fatalities when the number of crashes is m. Pf i : Probability of crash i being a fatal crash calculated based on Ogden (). Similar to the crash count calculation, the computational complexity of calculating fatality probabilities increases exponentially by the increase in number of crashes and fatalities. Fatality probabilities can also be estimated using a similar approach to crash probability equation estimates as follows: FP m k = ( m k ) P acfc k ( P acfc ) m k () Where: P acfc = m i= P f i m = average corridor fatality crash probability. Consequently, the probability of having k fatalities out of m crashes on a corridor with n crossings is calculated as: P nmk = CP n m FP m k () Table shows the probability of different crash outcomes for corridor based on the P nmk. As it can be observed from Table, the chance of having zero crashes and zero fatalities is equal to.%. (Note: this is the same probability of having zero crashes in Figure.) The chance of having two crashes and one fatality is equal to.0% while the chance of having two fatal crashes is equal to 0.%. m j=
7 Cumulative Probability Cumulative Probability Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani 0 TABLE Delay probability matrix of corridor. Number of Crashes Number of Fatalities %.% 0.% 0.%.0% 0.%.%.% 0.% 0.0%.%.%.% 0.% 0.0%.%.%.% 0.% 0.0% 0.0%.%.%.% 0.% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%.%.%.0% 0.% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%.%.% 0.% 0.% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.% 0.% 0.% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% The expected closure time of a corridor depends on the number and types of crashes, and their probabilities. Therefore, a closure time cumulative distribution function (CDF) can be built, for each corridor, from the combination of closure times and delay probability matrices (Table and Table ) as shown in Figure, left. Figure, right represents a smoothed version of the original cumulative probability function which is used in future calculations. The smoothed version is created by fitting a logistics curve on the original cumulative distribution functions. According to Figure, corridor has a % chance of experiencing a closure time of minutes or less while corridor has the same chance of having minutes of closure time. 00% 00% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ,000,0,00 Closure Time (minutes) ,000,0,00 Closure Time (minutes) % % 0 FIGURE Closure Time CDF. Total Train Delay Time Total train delay time of a corridor depends on both unexpected closure times, as explained in section., and train frequency. Train frequency is defined by calculating the average number of daily trains traveling through each crossing on that corridor. Figure illustrates how total delay time resulting from the same closure time duration could differ for different corridors. Corridor A has an inter-arrival time of 0 minutes while corridor B has an inter-arrival time of 0 minutes of through trains. In the occurrence of a 0-minute closure at a crossing, train delays will vary by corridor. Corridor A will experience a total
8 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani train delay of 00 minutes, with four trains being affected, while corridor B will experience a total train delay of 0 minutes, with only two trains being affected FIGURE Total delay time calculation. For any specific corridor, the total delay time resulting from a closure with a length of c minutes can be calculated as follow: (x + ) Total Delay Time = f x Where: f = train inter-arrival time at Corridor (min.) c = closure time at the crossing on Corridor (min.) x = c f Using equation (), total delay times of all of the corridors are calculated based on the frequency and outcome of crashes to estimate the corridor delay time at % confidence. The delays for selected corridors are presented in Table. TABLE Calculated delay times by corridor. Corridor Crossing Count Daily Trains Train Delay (min.), Prioritization of Projects The objective of the proposed corridor-level prioritization approach is to minimize total unplanned train delays along the corridors. This objective can be achieved by selecting a set of safety improvement actions which minimize total train delay times. As illustrated in Figure, the process uses a list of potential safety improvement actions as input and generates different action-sets based on the input list. Applying each action-set to individual corridors will lead to new train delays for North Carolina rail corridors, action-sets could impact all or some of the corridors. In aggregate, the action-set that minimizes the total train delay (maximizes the total reduction in delays) is the optimal action-set. The new train delays are calculated using crash modification factors and the process explained in previous sections. ()
9 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani FIGURE Prioritization Process. This objective can mathematically be presented as: Maximize Z = dr i x i Subject to k i= k c i x i budget i= x i, for all action i related to a unique corridor () 0 x i = {0,} for all i Where: k = total action-sets x i = binary variable of action-set i dr i = delay reduction due to implementation of action-set i c i = cost related to implementation of action-set i This proposed model is further explained through an illustrative case-study. In this case study, a total of six feasible projects with identical cost and crash modification factors (CMF) of $ and 0., respectively, on corridors, and, are considered (Table ).
10 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani TABLE Proposed safety projects. Project Crossing ID Cost CMF A H $ 0. B A $ 0. C 0W $ 0. D U $ 0. E H $ 0. F U $ 0. These six projects lead to distinct action-sets which could reduce total corridor delay times (Table ). An action-set represents one of all possible combinations for identified projects on a corridor. TABLE Complete action-sets. Action Project Corridor Action-Set Project Cost Original Delay Improved Delay Reduction in Delay A $ B $...0 C $... BC $.. 0. D $,.,.. E $,.,.. DE $,.,.. F $,.,..0 DF $,.,.. 0 EF $,.,. 0. DEF $,.,. 0.0 Assuming a budget constraint of $, and using the mathematical formulation presented above, the optimization function for this case study can be illustrated as: Maximize Z = 0.x +.0x +.x + 0.x +.x +.x +.x +.0x Subject to +.x + 0.x x x + x + x + x + x + x + x + x + x + x 0 + x (Ensure budget constraint) x (Maximum of one action from corridor ) x + x + x (Maximum of one action from corridor ) x + x + x + x + x + x 0 + x (Maximum of one action from corridor ) x i = {0,} for all i ( is the action is selected and 0 if the action is not selected) Under the current assumptions and budget constraints, and are the optimal action-sets for minimizing unplanned system delay. Implementation of these actions is expected to reduce total unplanned system delay by. minutes (Table ).
11 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani 0 0 TABLE Linear program solution. Action Project Corridor Action-Set Project Cost Original Delay Improved Delay Reduction in Delay B $...0 DE $,.,.. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK The proposed framework looks at a set of individually feasible projects and evaluates their implementation from a system improvement perspective. A system perspective allows this approach to select an optimal set of projects which maximize system improvement. The developed framework is an extension of already existing project valuation procedures, such as benefit cost analysis, and extends them from a pool of individual crossings into a multi-project optimization approach along multiple corridors. The rail corridor-level methodology facilitates communication with Rail Division stakeholders in both the public and private sectors. This approach mirrors USDOT s efforts to establish an overall infrastructure investment funding process that can be applied across all modes and objectives, such as safety and mobility. The expanded framework will also have the ability of prioritizing projects under limited budget by expanding the planning horizon beyond one year and sequencing the corridor-level projects in a way that yields the maximum quantifiable benefits to society. Future steps include the implementation of this method into a test case utilizing a designated funding source tasked with improving rail infrastructure. The corridor-level method will run in parallel to the existing prioritization method with continuous comparison of both systems in project selection, funding allocation, and infrastructure improvements. Its secondary purpose will involve the design and implementation of this methodology into web-based systems supported by existing metrics. This tool will be tasked with offering dynamic analysis for what if scenarios further assisting Rail Division s management in the selection and visualization of impacts to the rail infrastructure.
12 Arellano, Mindick-Walling, Thomas, Rezvani 0 REFERENCES. National Economic Council and the President s Council of Economic Advisers. An Economic Analysis of Transportation Infrastructure Investment. National Economic Council. 0.. Office of the Secretary of Transportation. Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE Grants) for Fiscal Year 0. DOT-OST U.S. Department of Transportation. 0.. TIGER Discretionary Grants. U.S. Department of Transportation. Accessed July, 0.. Rezvani A. Z, Peach M., Thomas A., Cruz R., Kemmsies W. Benefit-cost methodology for highway-railway grade crossing safety protocols as applied to transportation infrastructure project prioritization processes. European Transport Conference, 0.. McCrory P., Tennyson N., Weatherly K., Worley P. C. NCDOT Rail Division Comprehensive Rail Plan. North Carolina Department of Transportation Rail Division. 0.. Ogden, Brent D. Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook - Revised Second Edition 00. FHWA-SA Federal Highway Administration Brod, D., Weisbrod, G., Williges, C., Moses, S. J., Gillen, D. B., Martland, C. D. Comprehensive Costs of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Crashes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 0, pp..
North Carolina Statewide Freight Plan
Greater Charlotte Regional Freight Peer Exchange North Carolina Statewide Freight Plan Derry Schmidt & Terry Arellano NCDOT Planning Branch NC : Two Phase Process Phase 1 Interim MAP-21 compliant freight
More informationAASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation: Section 3, Bridge Management Systems A Practical Tour
0 0 0 AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation: Section, Bridge Management Systems A Practical Tour Dave Juntunen P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Bridge Development Engineer Vice-Chair AASHTO SCOBS
More informationThe Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary
The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary The Lawrence County Port Authority 216 Collins Avenue South Point, Ohio 45638 P a g e Contents I. Base Case...
More informationAn Introduction to the. Safety Manual
An Introduction to the Highway Safety Manual An Introduction to the HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Table of Contents Section 1: HSM Overview... 1 What is the Highway Safety Manual?... 1 How is the HSM Applied?...
More informationIncreasing Performance through Extremely Cool Prioritization and Project Selection
Increasing Performance through Extremely Cool Prioritization and Project Selection June 26, 2017 Presented by: Tamara Haas, PE Director, Asset Management & Planning New Mexico DOT Mara Campbell, CQM Chief
More informationBenefit Cost Analysis 2016 TIGER Grant Application Funding Opportunity #: DTOS59-16-RA-TIGER8
Benefit Cost Analysis 2016 TIGER Grant Application Funding Opportunity #: DTOS59-16-RA-TIGER8 Applicant: Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Packer Avenue Marine Terminal Berth and Crane Rail Enhancement
More informationPerformance of Aggregate Base Course Pavements in North Carolina
Performance of Aggregate Base Course Pavements in North Carolina Judith Corley-Lay, Ph.D., PE * Pavement Management Unit, NCDOT 1593 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1593 919-212-61 jlay@ncdot.gov
More informationCHAPTER 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE?
CHAPTER 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE? VISION After significant public outreach and coordination with numerous agencies, organizations, and individuals, Phase 1 established a vision for transportation
More informationManagement. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office
VDOT and MAP-21 Performance Management VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office Overview Map-21- How is VDOT Preparing?
More informationI-710 Project Committee Meeting
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority I-710 Project Committee Meeting January 29, 2009 Meeting Expectations Review I-710 planning context Concur on a port cargo forecast scenario to
More informationA MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007
A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY November 2007 Prepared by CENTER FOR PORTS AND WATERWAYS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE 701 NORTH POST
More informationGRADE SEPARATIONS WHEN DO WE SEPARATE? Texas Transportation Institute
GRADE SEPARATIONS WHEN DO WE SEPARATE? 1999 Texas Transportation Institute GRADE SEPARATIONS - WHEN DO WE SEPARATE? By G. Rex Nichelson, Jr., P.E. 1 and George L. Reed, J.D., P.E. 2 INTRODUCTION Beyond
More informationP.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
P.L. 114-94 Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Key Highway Provisions and Freight Provisions Dan Walston Transportation Planner FHWA PA Division 2 FAST Act Signed by President Obama on
More informationSabbir Saiyed, PhD., P.Eng. Manager, Transportation System Planning
Sabbir Saiyed, PhD., P.Eng. Manager, Transportation System Planning February 5, 2016 Goods Movement is a Major Part of Peel s Economy Peel is one of Canada s most important freight hubs Close to major
More informationODOT Asset Management Plan 0
ODOT Asset Management Plan 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 ODOT s Experience with Asset Management... 1 A New Way of Doing Business... 2 ODOT s Investment Plans... 3 Moving Forward... 5 1.0
More informationHighway Safety Manual
Highway Safety Manual First Edition Implementation Second Edition Development Jason J. Siwula, PE Kentucky Transportation Cabinet AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting June 22, 2016 Overview Recent efforts
More informationOperations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations
Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations 1 Purpose of this Meeting: Share Thoughts & Discuss Challenges brought about by the changing transportation environment and public
More informationSoutheast Florida Freight and Goods Movement Update Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council September 16, 2011
Southeast Florida Freight and Goods Movement Update Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council September 16, 2011 For Questions on this Presentation, Please Contact: Jeff Weidner, Mobility Manager Florida
More informationDELAY AND REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT TO OPERATE LONG FREIGHT TRAINS ON SINGLE-TRACK RAILWAYS WITH SHORT SIDINGS
DELAY AND REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT TO OPERATE LONG FREIGHT TRAINS ON SINGLE-TRACK RAILWAYS WITH SHORT SIDINGS Ivan Atanassov Graduate Research Assistant University of Illinois, IL, USA C. Tyler
More informationTo provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.
8.4-1 REPORT Meeting Date: 2014-06-26 Regional Council For Information DATE: June 17, 2014 REPORT TITLE: PEEL GOODS MOVEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE 2014 FROM: Dan Labrecque, Commissioner of Public Works
More informationNew Jersey Pilot Study
New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures for Two Corridors Executive Summary October 2014 ABOUT THE NJTPA THE NJTPA IS THE FEDERALLY AUTHORIZED Metropolitan Planning
More information2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development
2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, 2016 Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development Why the State Freight Plan is Important to You Vision,
More informationEmergency Incident Management, Benefits and Operational Issues
Emergency Incident Management, Benefits and Operational Issues -- Performance and Benefits Evaluation of CHART Ying Liu, Peiwei Lin, Nan Zou, Gang-len Chang Department of Civil Engineering University of
More informationStockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement
Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement 2017 $10.34 million in 2017 FASTLANE Grant funding to complete engineering design, permitting, and construction of the Stockton Track Extension and
More informationAnalysis of Demand Variability and Robustness in Strategic Transportation Planning
Analysis of Demand Variability and Robustness in Strategic Transportation Planning May 25, 21 Cambridge, MA Ahmedali Lokhandwala Candidate for M.S. in Transportation & M.Eng. in Logistics and Supply Chain
More informationUSDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)
USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP) Eric Randall TPB Transportation Engineer Jane Posey TPB Transportation Engineer MWAQC TAC February 14, 2017 Agenda Item 4 Performance Based Planning
More informationThe Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices
The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices The Sustainability Triple Bottom Line The Triple Bottom Line (TBL) means addressing Environmental, Economic and Social Equity dimensions of a project
More informationFHWA FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES WORKSHOP. May 2012
FHWA FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES WORKSHOP May 2012 Before we begin Introductions Agenda Additional Information Performance Measures Overview The surplus, that which is produced in one place to be consumed
More informationA COMPREHENSIVE BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM TO EXTEND SERVICE LIFE. Bruce Johnson 1
Abstract A COMPREHENSIVE BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM TO EXTEND SERVICE LIFE Bruce Johnson 1 Bridges represent a large investment in highway systems. As highway systems age, agencies should optimize the
More informationAASHTO s Highway Safety Manual and Performance Measures / Targets
AASHTO s Highway Safety Manual and Performance Measures / Targets Dr. Anthony Kane Director of Engineering and Technical Services Wednesday October 26, 2011 Bom dia damas e cavalheiros Talk Overview Highway
More informationIntroduction. Background
Example Transportation Asset Management Plan Outline This outline was created using the Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) Builder ( www.tamptemplate.org ), a product of NCHRP Project 8-36/116.
More informationGUARDRAIL WARRANTS FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS
74 GUARDRAIL WARRANTS FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS Louis B. Stephens, P.E. INTRODUCTION Low volume roads present many challenges to highway engineers and public administrators. Although, by definition, these facilities
More informationEffective Integration of Theory and Practice
Effective Integration of Theory and Practice Michael F. Gorman Department of MIS, OM, DSC University of Dayton Spotlight on Advanced Research and Scholarship November 19, 2010 1 Presentation Overview Integration
More information2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Study Area Interstate 81 (I-81) is relied upon for local and regional travel and interstate travel in the eastern United States. It extends 855 miles from Tennessee to New York at
More informationMONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE
12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges
More informationAddresses for Publications Referenced in the MUTCD
Draft Texas MUTCD The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is approved by the Federal Highway Administrator as the National Standard in accordance with Title 23 U.S. Code, Sections 109(d),
More informationLATTS II - Freight Investment Decision Principles
LATIN AMERICA TRADE AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY (LATTS) II Emerging Principles in Freight Investment Decision Abstract An extremely important component to effective transportation planning and to this point
More informationChapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 1 Introduction KEY POINTS The amount and value of freight are critical components of the overall economic health of Missouri. Missouri s multimodal freight system supports the movement of trucks,
More informationTechnical Methods Part 2
Technical Methods Part 2 Performance Measurement in Transportation Planning Leading for results means that performance must be planned, not just reported Learning Objectives Describe a sample technical
More informationAPPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS Travel demand models (TDM) simulate current travel conditions and forecast future travel patterns and conditions based on planned system improvements
More informationFlorida Freight Supplychain Intermodal Model
Florida Freight Supplychain Intermodal Model Innovations in Travel Modeling 2014 April 29, 2014 Introduction Support freight plan development Office of Freight Logistics and Passenger Operations Evaluate
More informationHB2 Implementation Policy Guide
report HB2 Implementation Policy Guide prepared for Commonwealth Transportation Board date August 1, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 HB2 Legislation Requirements... 1 1.2 Roles and Responsibilities...
More informationProject Evaluation Criteria
Project Evaluation Criteria Goals and Objectives were developed to guide Envision 35 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update. These guiding principles were based on the requirements included in the
More informationNetwork Effects and Cost of Railroad Crosstie Maintenance and Replacement
Network Effects and Cost of Railroad Crosstie Maintenance and Replacement Alexander Lovett, Tyler Dick, Conrad Ruppert 4 June 2014 Objectives Develop a methodology for comparing the economics of using
More informationThe Challenges of Measuring GHG and Other Impacts of Transport Policies: Overcoming Data Limitations
The Challenges of Measuring GHG and Other Impacts of Transport Policies: Overcoming Data Limitations Michael Replogle, ITDP Presentation to Global conference on Assessing Inland Transport CO2 Emissions
More informationThe Economic Return on Transportation Investments
The Economic Return on Transportation Investments The Florida Experience presented to ited Session: Integration of Economic Analysis into Transportation Decisions presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
More informationAdvanced Analytics Meets Pulp and Paper Planning and optimizing your Supply Chain from A to Z. June 22, 2016
Advanced Analytics Meets Pulp and Paper Planning and optimizing your Supply Chain from A to Z June 22, 2016 Meet the Presenters Gertjan de Lange Connecting Business & Optimization SVP, AIMMS Gertjan has
More informationOrigin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices
Origin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices presented by César A. Segovia, AICP Senior Transportation Planner AECOM September 17, 2015 Today s Webinar Content Matrix Estimation Data sources Florida Application
More informationA RANKING AND PRIORITIZING METHOD FOR BRIDGE MANAGEMENT
A RANKING AND PRIORITIZING METHOD FOR BRIDGE MANAGEMENT Saleh Abu Dabous and Sabah Alkass Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Rm: EV-6139 1455 de Maisonneuve,
More informationCITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 3.20.2017 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999
More informationHB2 Implementation Policy Guide
report HB2 Implementation Policy Guide prepared for Commonwealth Transportation Board date March 18, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 9 1.1 HB2 Legislation Requirements... 10 House Bill 1887...
More informationInland Port Cargo Complex
Inland Port Cargo Complex Regional Approach for Ports A statewide improvement Connects five plus seaports Promotes connectivity utilizing existing transportation network Improves rail efficiencies Relocates
More informationProgram Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) PERT Bar charts and CPM networks assume all activity durations are constant or deterministic. The assumption of constant durations may not be realistic because
More informationAGENDA ITEM #13: MAP-21/FAST ACT SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Keith Nichols, HRTPO
AGENDA ITEM #13: MAP-21/FAST ACT SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Keith Nichols, HRTPO Recent federal surface transportation legislation established that States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations
More informationWEBB COUNTY CITY OF LAREDO REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY 7917 McPherson Road, Suite 203 Laredo, Texas 78045 956-723-9841 November 30, 2016 The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation
More informationImproved Methods for Superelevation Distribution: I. Single Curve
Improved Methods for Superelevation Distribution: I. Single Curve Udai Hassein 1, Said Easa 2, Kaarman Raahemifar 3 1 Ph.D Candidate, 2 Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto,
More information2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014
2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014 1 About the plan Long-range transportation plan for the Twin
More informationRAIL-DOT INSTITUTIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES
RAIL-DOT INSTITUTIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES CONSULTANT TEAM STARISIS CORPORATION svarma@insight.rr.com Gordon Proctor & Associates goproctor@wowway.com Michael L. Bradley & Associates Consulting L.L.C.
More informationWith the challenges facing Washington s transportation
CHAPTER 5 REACHING THE VISION HOW WILL WE GUIDE OURSELVES MOVING FORWARD? With the challenges facing Washington s transportation system, the project team and partners identified four focus areas that consistently
More informationSUSTAINABLE REVERSE LOGISTICS
SUSTAINABLE REVERSE LOGISTICS Reducing Waste and Emissions in the Retail Supply Chain WHITE PAPER 02.24.2016 ABSTRACT The retail industry faces a large and growing challenge in managing the 3.5 billion
More informationQuantifying the Benefits of Pavement Management
Quantifying the Benefits of Pavement Management Smadi, O Research Scientist Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA SYNOPSIS Pavement management systems (PMS) have been in operation since the early 1970s
More informationRAPID INCIDENT SCENE CLEARANCE (RISC)
Approved: Effective: September 18, 2008 Traffic Engineering and Operations Topic No. 750-030-020-a RAPID INCIDENT SCENE CLEARANCE (RISC) PURPOSE: Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) is a highly innovative
More informationModal Investment Comparison: The Impact of Upper Mississippi River Lock and Dam Shutdowns on State Highway Infrastructure
: The Impact of Upper Mississippi River Lock and Dam Shutdowns on State Highway Infrastructure October, 2017 Project: MAFC-16 Authors: Ernest Perry, PhD, Teresa Adams, PhD, and Eric Oberhart University
More informationCalifornia High-Speed Train Program FEIR/EIS
Page 2-30 Page 2-31 Page 2-32 Page 2-33 Page 2-34 Page 2-35 Page 2-36 of Enrique Manzanilla, Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 31, 2004 (Letter AF008) AF008-1 Acknowledged. AF008-2
More informationScenario-based simulation of revenue loss at seismically damaged seaports
2 nd International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction November 27~29, 2007 Scenario-based simulation of revenue loss at seismically damaged seaports U. J. Na *, S. R. Chaudhuri, M. Shinozuka 1 Department
More informationScope of Services Traffic Signal Retiming Contract FM NO Florida Department of Transportation District Four
Scope of Services Traffic Signal Retiming Contract FM NO. 230017-8-32-01 Florida Department of Transportation District Four A-1 Contents 1. Background... 3 2. Summary of Services... 3 3. Consultant Requirements...
More informationLOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016
Donald Vary March 1, 2016 FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN COMPONENTS Introduction and Plan Summary Strategic Goals and Objectives Economic Context of Freight Freight Policies, Strategies and Institutions Louisiana
More informationPOSITION DESCRIPTION
POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE: Director of Logistics DEPARTMENT: Supply Chain FLSA STATUS: Exempt REPORTING RELATIONSHIPS POSITION REPORTS TO: POSITIONS MANAGED: SVP Of Sales & Operations Freight
More informationAre We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER
Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE 16 2014 SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER Topics Capacity existing infrastructure Further rail/port
More informationProject Overview. A Collaborative Effort
Project Overview A Collaborative Effort DRPT and FRA are working closely with CSX, which owns and operates the corridor, as well as with passenger operators Amtrak and Virginia Railway Express (VRE), the
More informationImplementation of HERS-ST in Iowa and Development/Refinement of a National Training Program
Implementation of HERS-ST in Iowa and Development/Refinement of a National Training Program Final Report August 2008 Sponsored by University Transportation Centers Program, U.S. Department of Transportation
More informationSoftware Reliability Modeling with Test Coverage: Experimentation and Measurement with A Fault-Tolerant Software Project
18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Software Reliability Modeling with Test Coverage: Experimentation and Measurement with A Fault-Tolerant Software Project Xia Cai and
More informationPresentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015
Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2 October 21, 2015 Life Cycle of a Candidate Project How it s planned. How it s scored. How it s funded. 2 How it s planned. VTrans2040 VTRANS 2040 serves two functions,
More informationEvaluation of the Economic Impact of Proposed Measures for Non-indigenous Species (NIS) Control on St. Lawrence Seaway Shipping
Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Proposed Measures for Non-indigenous Species (NIS) Control on St. Lawrence Seaway Shipping (Michigan Sea Grant Funded d Project, $312k, 1999-2003) Proposed Research:
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION TO THE POTENTIAL REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION TO THE POTENTIAL REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN R.L. Sweeney, USDOE Yucca Mountain Project; R. Best, Jason and Associates; P. Bolton, P. Adams, Booz-Allen & Hamilton
More informationThe evolution of public transport policy in Hong Kong since 1981
Smart Construction Research RESEARCH ARTICLE The evolution of public transport policy in Hong Kong since 1981 Li Zhe Wuhan Organize Research, Hubei, Wuhan Abstract: Counting only the usable land, the population
More informationINVENTORY STRATEGY INVENTORY PLANNING AND CONTROL
CHAPTER 7 INVENTORY STRATEGY INVENTORY PLANNING AND CONTROL 7.1 PURPOSES OF HOLDING INVENTORY Remember that the goal of a public health supply chain is to improve health outcomes. This goal is achieved
More informationClimate Change/Extreme Weather Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for Transportation Infrastructure in Dallas and Tarrant Counties
Climate Change/Extreme Weather Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for Transportation Infrastructure in Dallas and Tarrant Counties Yekang Ko (School of Urban and Public Affairs) With Arne Winguth & Jun
More informationRegional Transportation Studies Regional Council
Pima Association of Governments 1 E. Broadway, Tucson, Arizona Santa Rita Conference Room Regional Transportation Studies Regional Council September 28, 2017 I-11 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement
More informationActive Risk Management - Charles River Basin
Protecting, Promoting and Enhancing our Commonwealth: Assisting MassDOT to deliver projects on Time and on Budget Active Risk Management - Charles River Basin September 18, 2013 & Massachusetts Accelerated
More informationNew Bern Area MPO Website Pilot for Assessing Indirect and Cumulative Effects during Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)
New Bern Area MPO Website Pilot for Assessing Indirect and Cumulative Effects during Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Presented by Taruna Tayal, Candice Andre, AICP Alena R. Cook, PE September 14,
More informationRapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN
Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN Prepared for the Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Endorsed by the Executive Policy Committee of the Rapid City Area
More informationClimate Change and Transportation
Climate Change and Transportation Impacts and Adaptation Options Climate Change Preparedness in New Jersey: Leading Practices and Policy Priorities May 22, 2013 John Posey, Ph.D. Disclaimer: Opinions expressed
More informationAn Inventory Model with Demand Dependent Replenishment Rate for Damageable Item and Shortage
Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, January 7 9, 2014 An Inventory Model with Demand Dependent Replenishment Rate for Damageable
More informationTo provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and the Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.
9.2-1 REPORT Meeting Date: 2015-11-26 Regional Council For Information DATE: November 10, 2015 REPORT TITLE: REGION OF PEEL GOODS MOVEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN - 2015 STATUS UPDATE FROM: Dan Labrecque, Commissioner
More informationADVANCING NEW STRATEGIC FOCUSES THROUGH PERFORMANCE-BASED EVALUATION THE GROWTH OF STATE DOT APPROACHES
ADVANCING NEW STRATEGIC FOCUSES THROUGH PERFORMANCE-BASED EVALUATION THE GROWTH OF STATE DOT APPROACHES A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Elliot Asher Sperling In Partial Fulfillment of the
More informationLAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
LAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN Prepared for: City of Colorado Springs Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 508 South Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903
More informationPRODUCT-MIX ANALYSIS WITH DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION. Raid Al-Aomar. Classic Advanced Development Systems, Inc. Troy, MI 48083, U.S.A.
Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick, eds. PRODUCT-MIX ANALYSIS WITH DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION Raid Al-Aomar Classic Advanced Development
More informationManaging Strategic Initiatives for Effective Strategy Execution
Managing Strategic Initiatives for Effective Strategy Execution Process 1: Initiative Rationalization A Balanced Scorecard Collaborative White Paper September 2005 Introduction The proper management of
More informationCaitlin Hughes Rayman Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 2013
Caitlin Hughes Rayman Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 2013 MAP-21 Era: Changing the Freight Transportation Landscape Performance-based transportation system; Corridor-level
More informationJim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project
Memorandum Date: January 15, 2014 To: CC: From: Subject: Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project Paul Danielson, P.E. Project Manager, Southwest Light Rail
More informationAssessing Risks to Inform Resilience: a Criticality Assessment of the British Railway Network
Infrastructure Resilience and Performance Assessing Risks to Inform Resilience: a Criticality Assessment of the British Railway Network Dr Raghav Pant 1, Dr Simon Blainey 2, Prof Jim Hall 3 and Prof John
More informationPort of Hamburg: Heading into the future with smartport
Port of Hamburg: Heading into the future with smartport The strategy for intelligent port development The Port of Hamburg is the most eastern port of the North Range. The strategy for intelligent port
More informationOKI Board of Directors. Presentation Ten June 2012
OKI Board of Directors Presentation Ten June 2012 Today s Presentation: Public Comment Changes to the Draft Plan Summary Plan Adoption TIMELINE 2011 May Sept 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June OKI staff initiate
More informationTARGET SETTING COMPONENT 02
COMPONENT 02 TARGET SETTING This chapter provides assistance to transportation agencies with the Target Setting component of Transportation Performance Management (TPM). It discusses where target setting
More informationTravis Black StrongPorts Planner U.S. Maritime Administration. AAPA Environment Committee November 14, 2017 Norfolk, VA
Travis Black StrongPorts Planner U.S. Maritime Administration AAPA Environment Committee November 14, 2017 Norfolk, VA 2 46 USC 50302 Mission To lead the development and expansion and modernization of
More informationAN ENHANCED PARAMETRIC RAILWAY CAPACITY EVALUATION TOOL (RCET)
Lai & Barkan 1 AN ENHANCED PARAMETRIC RAILWAY CAPACITY EVALUATION TOOL (RCET) Yung-Cheng (Rex) Lai Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University Room 313, Civil Engineering
More informationSEASONAL EFFECT ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF RAIL DEFECT INSPECTION FREQUENCY
Proceedings of the ASME 2013 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference RTDF2013 October 15-17, 2013, Altoona, Pennsylvania, USA RTDF2013-4711 SEASONAL EFFECT ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF RAIL DEFECT
More information