Example Waste Utilization / Nutrient Management Plan. Revised 7/05
|
|
- Antony Norris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Example Waste Utilization / Nutrient Management Plan Revised 7/05
2 Step 1 - Locate Operation Locate on Topo Map first. Note if any named streams or water bodies present within 2000 feet of the application area of any field, look for other areas of environmental significance.
3 Dairy Facility Name of Topo Quad
4 Step - 2 Locate operation on a soil map. If published soil survey is not available Contact county office to see if they have maps available If no maps available locally, have office contact Area Resource Soil Scientist to get mapping done.
5
6 Step - 3 Again, note if any named water bodies present within 2000 feet of the application area of any field, look for other areas of environmental significance. Check soils to see if any are frequently flooded.
7 Site visit Step - 4 Discuss operation with producer and mention need to get soil tests on all application fields Gather facility data needed for waste utilization plan Record slope of the predominant soil of each field Note quality of perennial grass cover Record cropping system in cropland Record yield goal for crops
8 Develop plan map Step - 5 Operation may be located on an aerial photo. A sketch of the property can be made. You must have current soil test results for each field before you can complete plan.
9 Plan Map N 1 - Headquarters ac 2 - Pasture Pasture ac 4 - Pasture ac 5 - Hay land ac 6 - Wildlife land ac 7 Hay Land ac 8 Hay Land ac Dairy Lagoons Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1
10 Step - 6 Create an application area map Show buffers Filter Strips Other out areas Adjust field acreage due to these out areas
11 Application Area Map Riparian Forested Buffer Filter Strip Other non-application areas N Acres Available For Application 1 - Headquarters ac 2 - Pasture Pasture ac 4 - Pasture ac 5 Hay Land ac 6 - Wildlife land ac Hay land ac 8 Hay land ac Dairy Lagoons Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1
12 Step - 7 Locate fields on soil map. Find soil information needed for P-Index P Index or other waste utilization planning Soil legend Soil and Water Features Physical & Chemical Properties of Soil
13 Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N Scale 1:7920 2
14
15 Erath
16 Erath
17 Step 8 Confer with engineer in charge of designing the waste management system in order to get quantities of waste to be land applied. Start entering data into ag. waste utilization / nutrient management spreadsheet.
18
19
20
21
22
23 Step - 9 Complete P-Index P Index for each field to be used for waste application.
24 Application Area Map Riparian Forested Buffer Filter Strip Other non-application areas N Acres Available For Application 1 - Headquarters ac 2 - Pasture Pasture ac 4 - Pasture ac 5 Hay Land ac 6 - Wildlife land ac Hay land ac 8 Hay land ac Dairy Lagoons Dairy Blds. 5 Scale 1:7920 Well 2 8 1
25 Fields 2, 4, 5, 7, & 8 will be used for waste application. Soil test P results are: Field ppm (Very High) Field 4-70 ppm (Very High) Field 5-50 ppm (High) Field 7-9 ppm (Low) Field 8-12 ppm (Medium)
26 Start with Field 2 P Index
27 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points:
28 Site Characteristic #1 Soil Test P Level 405 ppm P = Very High
29 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac Very High Sub Total x 8.00 >150 lbs/ac Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 8.00
30 Site Characteristic #2 P Fertilizer Application Rate none
31 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 8.00
32 Site Characteristic #3 Organic P application rate Start with the > than 150 lb / ac rate. This will give you the highest value to begin with and then work back there, if enough acreage is available to reduce rate. Use a lower rate to start if you know the planned crop has a low P requirement.
33 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 14.00
34 Site Characteristic #4 P fertilizer application method and timing None applied
35 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Very High <100 feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 14.00
36 Site Characteristic #5 Organic P application method and timing Unless the dates shown in very high can be avoided you must check this box.
37 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac x 4.00 Very High <100 feet Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 18.00
38 Site Characteristic #6 Proximity of nearest field edge to named stream or lake. See soil map feet
39 Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N Scale 1:7920 2
40 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac Low 1-3 t/ac Medium 3-5 t/ac High 5-10 t/ac Very High >10 t/ac Total Index Points: 19.25
41 Runoff class Site Characteristic #7 Use predominant soil map unit for field 2 Use avg. field slope (2%) of that map unit (as determined in field) Find the hydrologic group for that soil Need to know field cover type and hydrologic condition.
42 Soil Map - Madison Erath County TX Sheet #2 N Scale 1:7920 2
43 Erath
44 Table 3 Runoff Class Based on Field Slope and Runoff Curve Number Runoff Curve Number Slope % <50 50 to to 80 > 80 < 1 N N N N M 1 to 2 N N VL L M >2 to 4 N N L M H >4 to 8 N VL M H VH >8 to 16 VL L M VH VH > 16 VL L H VH VH Refer to Texas NRCS Engineering Technical Note - Hydrology, No TX5, Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices - 10/90 for information on runoff curve numbers. Estimating Runoff for Conservation Practices - 10/90 for information on runoff curve numbers. N = Negligible, VL = Very Low, L = Low, M = Moderate, H = High, VH = Very High Table 4 - Partial Listing of Curve Numbers 1/ Cover Type Hydrologic Condition 2/ Soil Hydrologic Group A B C D Pasture poor fair good Hayland not grazed
45 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac x 1.00 Low Medium High Very High 1-3 t/ac 3-5 t/ac 5-10 t/ac >10 t/ac
46 Site Characteristic #8 Soil Erosion must be controlled to acceptable levels For water erosion RUSLE2 can be used For wind erosion see field office General guidance - if the area is pasture or hayland erosion is <1 unless poor cover, then 1-3 tons per acre should be used Cropland - needs to be calculated, unless already in the file.
47 Client Name: Dairy Field(s): 2 Date: 3/5/2005 Planner: Location: Crop: Coastal Grazing Impaired Watershed: Yes Runoff Curve No.: 74 Slope (%): 2 Site Characteristic Soil Test P Level Phosphorus Fertilizer ( ) Application Rate Organic Phosphorus ( ) Application Rate Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Method and Timing Organic Phosphorus Source Application Method and Timing Proximity of Nearest Field Edge to Named Stream or Lake Runoff Class (Runoff Class Table) Soil Erosion (All Sources) PHOSPHORUS INDEX WORKSHEET for East Texas Place an X in the approprate box for each of the Site Characteristic listed below. N/A Very Low -Low Moderate High Very High Sub Total x 8.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 0.00 None Applied 1-40 lbs/ac lbs/ac lbs/ac >150 lbs/ac x 6.00 None Applied Placed Deeper than 2 in. or broadcast w ith incorporation w ithin 48 hrs. 12/1-2/15 2/16-4/15 or 6/16-11/30 Surface Applied 4/16-6/15 x 0.00 Placed Deeper than 2 in. or Surface Applied None Applied broadcast w ith 2/16-4/15 or 12/1-2/15 4/16-6/15 incorporation 6/16-11/30 w ithin 48 hrs. Very Low >2000 feet Low feet Medium feet High feet x 4.00 Very High <100 feet x 1.25 Negligible Very Low or Low Moderate High Very High Very Low <1 t/ac x 1.00 Low Medium High Very High 1-3 t/ac 3-5 t/ac 5-10 t/ac >10 t/ac x 0.00 P Runoff Potential: Medium Total Index Points: 20.25
48 Post the P-Index P to the PI Report
49 Complete P Index for other Fields
50
51
52
53
54
55
56 Step - 10 Print waste sheet Review with producer
57 Step - 11 At this point you should point out to the producer fields with maximum application rates that could be adjusted to make better use of nutrients.
PENNSYLVANIA PHOSPHORUS INDEX UPDATE
PENNSYLVANIA PHOSPHORUS INDEX UPDATE Jennifer Weld Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Penn State University 2017 Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference November 2,
More informationAntonio Mallarino Professor, Department of Agronomy. Introduction
2003 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State University 121 USING THE IOWA PHOSPHORUS INDEX FOR AGRONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF FERTILIZER AND MANURE PHOSPHORUS Antonio Mallarino Professor,
More informationNUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590
IG-590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE INSTALLATION GUIDELINES NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590 GUIDELINES APPLICABLE FOR ALL PURPOSES Nutrient management activities shall
More informationManure Management Manual Revisions
Manure Management Manual Revisions Jim Spontak PA DEP Farms In PA 63,136 farms in PA 33813 have livestock Average farm is 124 acres, about 75% under 200 acres Women as the primary farm operator increased
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR CERTIFIED CNMP PROVIDERS
Customer Name: CNMP Preparer s Name: CNMP Reviewer s Name and Date: COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR CERTIFIED CNMP PROVIDERS COMPONENT Yes No NA 1. Overview - Brief statement
More informationNew Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University
New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University Situation Increasing concern for local and regional waters Substantial demand for
More informationDecember 2002 Issue # PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS. Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction
December 2002 Issue #12 2002 PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction Soil phosphorus (P) is important for crop production. Phosphorus
More informationAgriculture Action Packet DRAFT Attachment # FARM MAP EXAMPLE DRAFT
Attachment # FARM MAP EXAMPLE Attachment # Conservation Systems to Meet the PA E&S Guidelines to be Used as an Interim Guideline when a Plan Meeting Soil Loss (T) Cannot be Obtained Guiding Principles
More informationHOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION
HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION Dick Wolkowski and Larry Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin What are the issues Forage producers typically
More informationTHE FUTURE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN
THE FUTURE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN Susan M. Porter 1 The Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) is responsible for promulgating nutrient management rules in Wisconsin
More informationSOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS. D. Beegle, J. Weld, P. Kleinman, A. Collick, T. Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS
SOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS D Beegle, J Weld, P Kleinman, A Collick, T Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS Part of a larger national effort to improve the P Index and P Management Chesapeake Bay
More informationMissouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard
Missouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard March 4, 2009 Division of Environmental Quality Water Protection Program I Introduction A. Authority and Purpose Missouri
More informationIA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft
IA NRS Cost Tool Overview Tyndall & Bowman, 2016 Draft Edge of Field Practices Riparian Forest Buffers and Vegetative Filter Strips: Riparian buffers and filter strips are strategically located vegetated
More informationNutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance
Nutrient Management in Developing and Agricultural Areas A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance Chris Meehan, P.E. May 25, 2011 Agenda Physical Improvements Planning Improvements How to get it
More informationSmall-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward
L P E S Small Farms Fact Sheet series Livestock and Poultry Environmental Stewardship < L P E S > Curriculum : How to be a Good Steward By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University Summary Good stewardship
More informationBMP Verification: What is it and How Will it Impact Pennsylvania?
BMP Verification: What is it and How Will it Impact Pennsylvania? Chesapeake Bay Program Conservation District and Agency Staff Meeting March 13, 2017 + over 400 other unique practices approved by the
More informationLivestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow
Nutrient Management Practices for Small Livestock Farms Dr. Michael L. Westendorf Extension Specialist Rutgers University Fred Kelly New Jersey USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Basic Nutrient
More informationPhosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils
Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils Umass Extension - Managing Phosphorus in Organic Residuals Applied to Soils: Composts, Biosolids, Manures and Others November 2, 2016 - Marlborough, MA Jennifer
More informationMud Lake Lakeshed Assessment
Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment The lakeshed vitals table identifies where to focus organizational and management efforts for each lake. Criteria were developed using limnological concepts to determine the
More information7.10 BRA Sediment Reduction Program
7.10 BRA Sediment Reduction Program 7.10.1 Description of Option The protection of already developed water supplies is a key element of water supply planning. Because Region G s inventory of suitable sites
More informationAct 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017
Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Program Pennsylvania's Nutrient Management Act (Act 38, 2005) Introduction
More informationAgricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis
Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis December 2014 Executive Summary The Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis was developed from a 2014 analysis of current requirements for the riparian areas
More informationWisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014
Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014 The Fox River Contributes 1/3 of All Nutrients to Lake Michigan APRIL 15, 2011 Photo
More informationLPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward. By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University
LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Small-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University Summary Good stewardship is important for everyone, including
More informationNITROGEN MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY REPORT
NITROGEN MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY REPORT Date March 15 2015 Name Joe Member Member ID No. 1234 Crop Year 2014 APN (1) Field ID (1) Crop (2) Acres (3) Ratio (4) 053-080-043 001 Almonds 130 1.1 053-080-043
More informationIowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information
Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information 2013 Iowa Water Conference Reid Christianson, P.E., Ph.D. Center for Watershed Protection Ellicott City, Maryland Project Components Project Goal
More informationLand Application of Manure
University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension EC 98-758-S WORKSHEET 11 Nebraska s Farm Assessment System for Assessing the Risk of Water Contamination Why should I be concerned? Stewardship of soil and
More informationRiparian Buffers and Stream Restoration
Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration Why focus on riparian areas? Link land and water on any given site and link landscapes together in a watershed Riparian corridors protect the circulatory system
More informationHistory of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold
History of Model Development at Temple, Texas J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold INTRODUCTION Then Model development at Temple A long history (1937-present) Many scientists participating in: Data collection
More informationImplementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions
1 Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy Agricultural Sector/FSA CRP Program Measures Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions Measure Background Visual
More informationNutrient Management in Kentucky
IP-71 Nutrient Management in Kentucky Nutrient Management Focus Group, Environmental and Natural Resource Issues Task Force AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES FAMILY & CONSUMER SCIENCES 4-H/YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
More informationGrazing Land Management and Water Quality
Grazing Land Management and Water Quality In generally management of grazing lands requires fewer chemical inputs such as fertilizers and herbicides. However, grazing lands account for a larger land surface
More informationMDA BMP Functional Equivalents. Update WQGIT 11/12/13
MDA BMP Functional Equivalents Update WQGIT 11/12/13 Executive Order 12508 In January of 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order (EO) 12508 on the Chesapeake Bay. May 12, 2010, the EO Strategy was
More informationLittle Bear Watershed
Implementation and Maintenance of WQ BMPs A sociological study of cooperator behavior in the Little Bear River watershed Dr. Douglas Jackson-Smith Michael Halling, MS Ernesto de la Hoz, Lorien Belton,
More informationWhat Works: Farming Practices
What Works: Farming Practices Forestry, Farming and Filtration: Productive Lands and Water Supplies Can Coexist September 23, 2010 St. Paul Center, Augusta, Maine Farming Practices Protect Water Nutrient
More informationManaging Upland Grazing to Restore Soil Health and Farm Livelihoods
Managing Upland Grazing to Restore Soil Health and Farm Livelihoods Richard Teague, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Wimberley, Texas 30 th September 2016 Carbon rich soil: Benefits the entire ecosystem Healthy
More informationL-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University Great Lakes Sedimentation Workshop Ann Arbor Mi. L-THIA On-line watershed delineation
More informationVery slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required.
Land Capability Classes Land and Soil Capability Class 1 Class 1 Definition Very slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required. On-site impact of land management practices
More informationLPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Got Barnyard Runoff? By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University
LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University Summary Uncontrolled runoff from barnyards and open lots can contain nutrients and
More informationDELINEATING AGRICULTURE IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN
DELINEATING AGRICULTURE IN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN For Final Report for the Sampling Analysis: Delineating Agriculture in the Neuse River Basin Submitted October 5, 2011 to the NC Department of Environment
More informationWVU Extension Fertility Recommendation Tool (FRT) for Small Farms
Introduction WVU Extension Fertility Recommendation Tool (FRT) for Small Farms Tom Basden and Ed Rayburn, Extension Specialists WVU Extension Service, Agriculture and Natural Resources April 2014 Nutrient
More informationOn-Field Ohio! Evaluate/Revise the Ohio P Risk Index using Field Scale Edge-of-Field Monitoring Data
On-Field Ohio! Evaluate/Revise the Ohio P Risk Index using Field Scale Edge-of-Field Monitoring Data OSU: Libby Dayton, Chris Holloman, Shane Whitacre, Sakthi Subburayalu, Greg LaBarge, USDA-ARS: Kevin
More informationConservation Planning. Steve Barker, Resource Management Systems LLC
Conservation Planning Steve Barker, Resource Management Systems LLC Overview What is a conservation plan Conservation Districts The NRCS 9 step planning process First Nations support for Tribal producers
More informationBackground. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary
AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management Glossary Bankfull Stage: The stage at which water starts to flow over the flood plain; the elevation of the water surface at bankfull discharge. (This
More informationA Presentation of the 2011 IA MN SD Drainage Research Forum. November 22, 2011 Okoboji, Iowa
A Presentation of the 2011 IA MN SD Drainage Research Forum November 22, 2011 Okoboji, Iowa 1 Phosphorus Loss Through Subsurface Tile Drainage A.P. Mallarino, M.U. Haq, M.J. Helmers, R.S. Kanwar, C.H Pederson,
More informationPennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE
Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE Frank Schneider Nutrient Management Program Director 717-705-3895 fschneider@pa.gov Jerry Martin Senior
More informationLand Application and Nutrient Management
MODULE D Land Application and Nutrient Management Figure 34-13. Relationship between the concentration of dissolved P in subsurface drainage from 30 cm deep lysimeters and the Mehlich-3 extractable soil
More informationErosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation
3930-FM-WM0155 Rev. 7/2004 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for a Timber Harvesting Operation 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location Municipality B. Timber sale area = acres Date County C. Landowner Name
More informationGypsum Use to Reduce P Loss From Agricultural Fields 2013
Gypsum Use to Reduce P Loss From Agricultural Fields 2013 Bulletin No. 680 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, 2013 William Batchelor, Director Auburn University Auburn, AL FGD Gypsum may be stockpiled
More informationProtecting Your Water and Air Resources
Protecting Your Water and Air Resources Montana Agri-Business Association Convention (Feb 1, 2013) by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist and Adam Sigler, Extension Associate Water Quality
More informationLAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE
CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of swine manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key steps
More informationTech Manual Update Bulletin
Tech Manual Update Bulletin Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act Program VERSION 10 OCTOBER 2017 The Pennsylvania Act 38 Nutrient Management Program Technical Manual has been developed in order to provide
More informationDRAFT Great Bay Nitrogen Non-Point Source Study
DRAFT Great Bay Nitrogen Non-Point Source Study by Philip Trowbridge, P.E. & Matthew A. Wood Ted Diers, Administrator Watershed Management Bureau Open up the black box Source: PREP (2013) Non-Point Sources
More informationNarragansett Bay and Watershed Restoration Bond Fund
Narragansett Bay and Watershed Restoration Bond Fund 1) Govt. Entities Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Control Fund 2) Non-Govt. Non-point Source Water Pollution Control Fund 3) Riparian Buffer Restoration
More informationNatural Resources & Environmental Stewardship
Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Melissa L. Wilson Department of Environmental Science & Technology Ag Nutrient Management Program University of Maryland,
More informationSaturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS
Saturated Buffer To intercept tile drainage prior to discharging to surface waters and redistribute the water laterally in the soil profile of the streamside buffer. Subsurface drainage, also known as
More informationCropping System Nutrient Management
Cropping System Nutrient Management A Crop Advisor and Extension Specialist View Chris Snip Crop Sales Specialist Agris Co-op Cottam Jake Munroe Soil Fertility Specialist Field Crops OMAFRA Stratford Goals
More informationVermont Phosphorus Index User Guide. version 6.0 October 2017
Vermont Phosphorus Index User Guide version 6.0 October 2017 The Phosphorus Index is a tool developed to assess the potential for phosphorus runoff from individual fields based on soil and field characteristics
More informationRecordkeeping Manure and Fertilizer. Marilyn L. Thelen, Educator MSU Extension
Recordkeeping Manure and Fertilizer Marilyn L. Thelen, Educator MSU Extension What is a Nutrient Management Plan? Managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the application of nutrients
More informationThe Vermont Dairy Farm Sustainability Project, Inc.
The Vermont Dairy Farm Sustainability Project, Inc. The Vermont Dairy Farm Sustainability Project A Collaboration to Improve Dairy Farm Nutrient Balance Greg Weber, Project Coordinator, 2001-2003 Bill
More informationNATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (Acre) CODE 590 DEFINITION Managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the application of
More informationIntegrating Water Quality and Natural Filters into Maryland s Marine Spatial Planning Efforts
Integrating Water Quality and Natural Filters into Maryland s Marine Spatial Planning Efforts Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow July 31, 2014 Watershed-scale restoration targeting helps direct
More informationAG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA Fax Corning Eucalyptus Farm
AG-LAND Investment Brokers 275 Sale Lane Red Bluff, CA 96080 530-529-4400 Fax 530-527-5042 Corning Eucalyptus Farm Tehama County,, California 1 of 6 deep irrigation wells Drip tubing rolled at the edge
More informationPonds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.
POND SITE SELECTION AND CONSTRUCTION Uses, Planning, & Design David Krietemeyer Area Engineer USDA-NRCS June 20, 2008 Uses Considerations for Location of Commonly Used Terms Pond A water impoundment made
More informationCurrent Nutrient Management Strategies for Poultry Production. Josh B. Payne, Ph.D. Animal Waste Mgmt. Specialist
Current Nutrient Management Strategies for Poultry Production Josh B. Payne, Ph.D. Animal Waste Mgmt. Specialist Animal Production Trend Transitioned to achieve an economy of scale Low profit margins &
More informationPRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.)
PA528 1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.) CODE 528 DEFINITION Managing the harvest of vegetation with grazing and/or browsing animals. PURPOSE
More informationMARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
MARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OCC Tasks 20 and 21 FY 1990 319(h) Task 210 EPA Grant # C9-006704-90-0 Submitted by: Oklahoma Conservation Commission Water Quality Division 413 NW 12 th Oklahoma City,
More information12/28/2016. Air. Surface Water. Ground Water. Soil. 1. Calculate agronomic rate. 2. Identify optimal fields. 3. Determine when to apply
Air Ground Surface Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Management Specialist Whatcom Conservation District Far West Agribusiness Kennewick, WA December 13, 2016 Soil Manure Agronomics & Balance Soil s in grain, forage
More informationOverall Instructions
Farm Evaluation Survey Overall Instructions This Farm Evaluation Survey is prepopulated with member information you provide to the Coalition. If any information is incorrect, please indicate the correct
More informationEcosystem Service Tradeoffs in the Implementation of the Bay TMDL
Ecosystem Service Tradeoffs in the Implementation of the Bay TMDL Lisa A. Wainger 1 and Jay Messer 2 1 University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science 2 Retired; formerly of US EPA Office of Research
More informationVIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water
VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water Introduction to Riparian Buffers Adapted from: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water. Maryland Cooperative Extension. Wye
More informationImproving Soil Health with Grazing
Improving Life through Science and Technology Improving Soil Health with Grazing Soil Health Workshop Gatesville, TX 2015 Richard Teague, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Vernon 90% of Soil function is mediated
More informationThe Value of Buffers
Maintain Your Buffers Manage the land to maintain and encourage shallow sheet flow and water infiltration. New techniques have been developed to address concentrated flow, for example, strategically positioned
More informationNutrient and Sediment Modeling of the Yahara Lakes Watershed
Nutrient and Sediment Modeling of the Yahara Lakes Watershed Yahara CLEAN Project Rob Montgomery John Panuska Watershed Remediation Flow Chart - Watershed-scale Analysis - Pheasant Branch Field-scale pilot
More informationWildlife Management Intensity Standards
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management The planned manipulation of livestock numbers and grazing intensities to increase food, The planned manipulation of livestock
More informationFERTILIZING SUGARBEET
FERTILIZING SUGARBEET NITROGEN & QUALITY: Sugarbeet quality is dependent on the sucrose content in the roots and the level of impurities that must be removed during sugar refining. Production of high quality
More informationHEALTH SOIL MEANS Healthy Farms and Cleaner Water!
HEALTH SOIL MEANS Healthy Farms and Cleaner Water! National Hypoxia Taskforce Meeting May 10, 2012 Barry Fisher State Soil Health Specialist, Indiana NRCS - HELPING PEOPLE HELP THE LAND Improving Soil
More informationLAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE
CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of poultry manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key
More informationWATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 201 The Maitland Valley Conservation Authority has prepared this report card as a summary on the state of our forests, wetlands, surface water, and ground water resources.
More informationRanch Water Quality Plan Template for. Napa River & Sonoma Creek Watersheds
Ranch Water Quality Plan Template for Napa River & Sonoma Creek Watersheds Michael Lennox UCCE Ranch Planning & Conservation Monitoring Coordinator February 28, 2012 San Pablo Bay Sonoma Cr = 126 sq mi
More informationBenefits and Damages Statement
Sibley County Drainage Authority: RE: Sibley County Minnesota County Ditch No. 46 Redetermination of Benefits October 11, 2017 In accordance with the Minnesota Statute 103E.351 law, we herewith submit
More informationRangeland Conservation Effects Assessment Program (CEAP)
Rangeland Conservation Effects Assessment Program (CEAP) Program Overview with Emphasis on the Literature Review of Rangeland Practices Pat L. Shaver, PhD Rangeland Management Specialist USDA-NRCS West
More informationWest Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries. Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance. By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center
West Fork White River Watershed Conservation Map Summaries Prepared for the Beaver Watershed Alliance By the Watershed Conservation Resource Center November 2014 The Watershed Conservation Resource Center
More informationPhosphorus Site Index (PSI) and the Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT)
Phosphorus Site Index (PSI) and the Phosphorus Management Tool (PMT) Patricia Steinhilber Department of Environmental Science & Technology Agricultural Nutrient Management Program University of Maryland
More informationNutrient Management in Crop Production
Nutrient Management in Crop Production Dr. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Focus On Agriculture Water Quality Hypoxia Pfiesteria piscicida Nitrate Tile Flow Sediment
More informationFertilization of Perennial Grasses. Jack E. Rechcigl & Martin B. Adjei Gulf Coast REC & Range Cattle REC, UF/IFAS
Fertilization of Perennial Grasses Jack E. Rechcigl & Martin B. Adjei Gulf Coast REC & Range Cattle REC, UF/IFAS Introduction Most cost-effective provision of plant nutrients: N, P & K (soil ph); Ca Mg
More informationRiparian Buffer Restoration Fund. Gregg J. Cassidy RI DEM, Sustainable Watersheds Office
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund Gregg J. Cassidy RI DEM, Sustainable Watersheds Office Narragansett Bay and Watershed Restoration Bond Fund 1) Govt. Entities Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Control Fund
More informationUsing No-till and Cover Crops to Reduce Phosphorus Runoff
Using No-till and Cover Crops to Reduce Phosphorus Runoff How to Avoid SRP in Surface Water Dr. K. Rafiq Islam, Research Scientist Jim Hoorman, Assistant Professor, Agriculture and Natural Resources hoorman.1@osu.edu
More informationExtending the Summer Grazing Season. John Jennings Professor - Forage Specialist
Extending the Summer Grazing Season John Jennings Professor - Forage Specialist Seasonal Forage Production 100 days 100 days 100 days 65 days Spring Summer Fall Winter Bermudagrass for Extending the Forage
More informationALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE
ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE Alfalfa hay generally constitutes 40% of the ration of Idaho's dairy cows. Alfalfa yield and quality may be affected
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationC O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e
C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N f or th e R O S S B A R NE T T R E SERV O I R WATERS HED, MI S S I S S I P P I E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y O C T O B E R
More informationPA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan
PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan Instructor: Bryan Seipp, Watershed Manager- CWP Lee Epstein, Director, Lands Program- CBF 1 To Adjust How the Slides Appear on Your Screen To make
More informationPrecision Ag. Back to Basics
Precision Ag Back to Basics Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist OMAFRA) Mike Wilson (CCA-ON, Advanced Agronomy Solutions Manager - Thompsons Limited) What is Precision Agriculture a management system
More informationWater Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed HGAC Clean Waters Initiative Houston, Texas September 26, 2017 Agency Role Water Quality Mandate
More informationNATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. (Ac.) CODE 590
590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (Ac.) CODE 590 DEFINITION Managing the amount (rate), source, placement (method of application), and timing
More informationBasic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts
ECONOMICS TECHNICAL NOTE United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Economics Technical Note No.: TN 200-ECN-1 August 2013 Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts By
More informationMaryland Nutrient Management Program
Maryland Nutrient Management Program Nutrient management planning plays a key role in reducing nutrients from agricultural non-point sources Maryland Nutrient Management Program (MNMP) was established
More informationAction Packet for Agriculture
Pennsylvania Water Quality Action Packet for Agriculture A Self Assessment and Planning Tool for Water Quality Protection Under the PA Clean Streams Law Funded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
More informationUsing Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source for Forage Crops. Workgroup. Marsha Campbell Mathews University of California Farm Advisor Stanislaus County
Using Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source for Forage Crops Marsha Campbell Mathews University of California Farm Advisor Stanislaus County David Crohn University of California Waste Management Specialist,
More information