PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information"

Daniella Miller
6 years ago
Views:

1 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Please read the attached guidance before filling in the form Country Project submission Date Project title Serbia and Montenegro Republic of Serbia April 2003 Sector Project Code (filled by the REC) Sustainable integrated solid waste managament in Krusevac Waste SR-15 A-1.1 A-1 Information about foreseen implementing agency Name Public Enterprise "Kruševac" A-1.2 Address Jasicki put bb, Krusevac A-1.3 Phones (+381) A-1.4 Faxes (+381) A-1.5 s A-1.6 Person responsible for contacts with the Ministry/Fund Municipality of Krusevac A-1.7 Name and function of person responsible for overall project implementation Dragan Djurdjevic, Director and Olivera Drenovac A-1.8 Legal status of the implementing agency Municipal company A-1.9 Institutions/firms jointly implementing the project (if any) TTI Group d.o.o. Belgrade A-1.10 What is the division of responsibilities (if joint implementation) A-2 Strategic context VH- very high; H- high; M- medium; L- low; VL very low; N- none (mark where appropriate) VH H M L VL N A2-1 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on regional level? X A2-2 What priority is allocated to the indicated sector on country level? X A2-3 Does an up-to-date country strategy in this sector exist? Yes No A2-4 Does an up-to-date country action plan in this sector exist? Yes No A2-5 What is the project (idea) priority from the regional scale point of view? X A2-6 What priority is allocated to project (idea) on a country level? X

2 A2-7 What is the project (idea) priority from the cross border cooperation point of view? X A2-8 What is the project (idea) priority from the local point of view? X A2-9 What is the project (idea) priority from the human health protection point of view? X A2-10 What is the project (idea) priority from the country economy point of view? X A2-11 What is the project (idea) priority from the ecosystem point of view? X

3 A-3 Information about the project A3.1 Short description of the environmental problem Kruševac is a medium size city of 80,000 located in central Serbia. Solid waste collection and disposal is managed by the Public Enterprise Kruševac, and collected solid waste is disposed of at a landfill that was designed and constructed in The current landfill is equipped with some infrastructure for sanitary operations, but not all components of this infrastructure are currently operational, and they do not cover all of the territory of the landfill. According to its original design, the landfill has an expected lifetime of years, and this lifetime may be increased if the city is able to implement waste re-use and recycling programs to reduce the amount of solid waste that goes to landfill. At the same time, the PE Kruševac is receiving requests from other communities currently not served with solid waste collection and landfill to extend its collection and disposal services to those areas. A3.2 Origins and positive environmental impact of the project A3.2.1 Description of factors that inspired the project (driving forces) FR Yugoslavia is preparing new regulations, on the national level, which are compatible with EU standards. Realization of this project would be direct help for solving the existing problems in field of solid waste treatment in the country. With this project, solid waste management in Krusevac will be improved and correlated with high ecological standards. Krusevac municipality established cooperation with three smaller, neighboring municipalities in field of protection of confluence of River Rasina from pollution. A3.2.2 Project main goal and objectives The goals, which this project is maintaining, are: Better standard of inhabitants of Krusevac Environmental protection of Krusevac municipality Providing the conditions for future regional landfill with recycling centre A3.2.3 expected positive environmental effects A3.2.4 Health impact of the project A3.2.5 Size of population benefiting from the project implementation A3.2.6 Scale of impact Reduction of air pollution and elimination of soil and groundwater contamination with toxic substances. Positive health impacts expected through prevention of groundwater contamination Regional Local Country Cross border (County) Local X X X A3.3 Project status Performance [%] Start [MM/YY]e End [MM/YY] A Pre-feasibility study A Feasibility study 100% August 2002 May 2003 A Detail engineering designs A EIA A Permits A Financing A Procurements A Construction

4 A A A Start of operation and training staff Operation Description of critical factors affecting project implementation: Availability of funds Capacity of implementing agency to manage project and municipal solid waste management (MSVM) system overall Willingness and ability of citizens to pay increased MSWM fees

5 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part B Waste management B Technical and environmental information on project B-1 Project type B1.1 Project type Sanitation and expansion of existing landfill B1.2 Technical description Expanding the services (obtaining the new containers) I phase of landfill sanitation II phase of landfill sanitation Landfill expansion Obtaining the new landfill vehicles and vehicles for waste collection Landfill re-cultivation Recycling center B1.3 Project location(s) (exact address) The existing landfill Srnje, located 7 km from the downtown of Krusevac. B1.4 Location from the environmental impact point of view (mark where appropriate) Hot spots Downtown area and/or specially protected areas X Other densely populated areas Loosely populated areas B-2 Status of the ownership title to land and buildings (mark where appropriate)) B2.1 Settled X B2.2 Not settled B2.3 Under settlement (describe status) B-3 Category of a technological solution proposed (mark where appropriate) B3.1 Modern X B3.2 Modern, not widely implemented B3.3 Traditional B3.4 Old B-4 Pressure on environment Generating intensities Unit Before project After project B4.1 MSW tons/a B4.2 Percentage of disposed waste % B4.3 Industrial waste tons/a B4.4 Nuclear waste tons/a B4.5 Hazardous waste tons/a B4.6 Other tons/a B4.7 Waste recycling % B-5 Evidence of the reduction of pressure on environment (mark where appropriate) B5.1 By direct emission monitoring B5.2 By technical specification of equipment X

6 B5.3 Other, e.g. input characteristics (give a description) B5.4 None B-6 Stakeholders opinion (mark where appropriate) B6.1 Positive attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs X B6.2 Positive attitude of authorities, public protests B6.3 Public opinion not informed B6.4 Project known, attitudes neutral B6.5 Negative attitude of authorities, local population and NGOs B6.6 Opinions not known

7 PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part C -Financial information C Financial information on project C-1 Investment outlays [ ] 5, EUR C-2 Operating costs and revenues due to project implementation [ ] Before project After project Total operating costs Total operating revenues C-3 Operating capital [ ] After project Demand for working capital C-4 Financing sources [ ] Total Disbursed Committed Planned % C4.1 Own sources 0 0 1, , C4.2 Grants (source: S&M government) C4.3 Soft Loans 0 0 (source: ) C4.4 Loans with subsidized interest 0 0 (source: ) C4.5 Private sector 0 0 (source: ) C4.6 Other (please specify) 0 0 3, , (source: foreign grant or loan) 0 C4.7 Total 0 0 5, , C.5 Financing schedule [ ] Planned Sources Own Other Total Year Activity C.4.1 C42- C4.6 C Total Preparation phase Construction 5, , , Total 5, , , REC PEIP project reference number What is the project (idea) priority from addressing an environmental threat of regional importance? Is the project linked to the EU acquis? If yes, which EU directive? SR-15 System of integrated waste management for the region around Krusevac where currently such does not exist. Reduction of air pollution and elimination of soil and groundwater contamination with toxic substances will have regional impact. It is linked with EU acquis process, e.g. with Waste Framework Directive

8 C-4 Need for financing C-4.1 C-4.2 C-4.3 C-4.4 Technical Assistance: describe the technical assistance needed give the estimated cost Investment co-financing: describe the elements for which grant financing is needed give the amount of grant needed Loan financing: specify the capital investment elements for which loan financing is sought give the amount of loan needed Describe the implementation schedule by years Assistance in technical documentation for main project EUR First phase of project realization 2, EUR Realization of all phases of the main project 2, EUR <Total cost is 5, EUR, > C-5 If the loan is foreseen, please provide information indicated below C-5.1 Who will be the borrower? JKP Krusevac C-5.2 C-5.3 Who will guarantee the loan (if relevant)? Describe the borrower: key activities, current tariffs structure, plans for tariffs increase, accounts for the previous 2 years and budget for next year Municipality of Krusevac Utility service Services of waste management for inhabitants and Industry: 1,94 din/m², 3,72din/m² respectively (corresponding to EURO/m², EURO/m² respectively ) 10% per year tariff increase C-5.4 C-5.5 Describe the municipality (if relevant): accounts for the previous 2 years and budget for next year, existing long-term obligations, city budget, current surplus etc. Affordability forecast

PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information

PROJECT INFORMATION FORM Part A - General information Country Project submission Date Serbia and Montenegro, Republic of Montenegro February 2003 1 (updated June 2005) Sector Project Code (filled by the