City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report
|
|
- Augustine Ford
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hydrology Study City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report Orange, Orange County, California Prepared For: Greenlaw Partners Von Karman Avenue, Suite 250 Irvine, CA Prepared By: Contact Person: Scott P. Gilbert, P.E. MBI JN July 18, 2016 D1-1
2 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Table of Contents Section 1 - Introduction General Introduction... 3 Section 2 Design Criteria... 5 Section 3 Hydrology Watershed Description and Drainage Patterns Land Use Development Precipitation Infiltration and Soils Watershed Model Development Design Hydrology... 7 Section 3 - Results Existing Hydrology Results Proposed Hydrology Results Conclusion... 8 Appendix A: Existing Hydrology Calculations & Map Appendix B: Proposed Hydrology Calculations & Map Appendix C: Reference Materials 2 D1-2
3 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 1 - Introduction 1.1 General Introduction The 8.62 acre site is located at 1 City Boulevard in Orange, California which is situated southwest of the Block of Orange development along City Boulevard. The project site, designated land use Urban Mixed Use, is bounded by the parking lots to the north, to the south, City Boulevard to the east, and South Lewis Street to the West. The site is relatively level with an approximate maximum elevation difference of 2 feet sloping down to the southwest. Currently, the site is developed with a multi-story commercial building situated on the southeastern portion of the site. The site is bounded on all sides with asphalt parking, drive aisles, and roadways. Some minor landscaping is present along the property lines and within the parking aisles. The proposed development will consist of a 5-story residential building wrapped around a 7-story parking structure and an additional 6.5-level parking structure is proposed toward the central portion of the property, where one level of parking is below grade for this structure. The existing multi-story commercial building will be preserved in the southeastern portion of the site while the remaining areas will become access roads to these elements. Proposed drive aisles will utilize a combination of asphalt and concrete pavers while common areas will utilize concrete, turf, and landscaping. Waste generated will be typical of a residential and commercial community. Some amenities included are a pool deck, pool building, lobby, and a courtyard located central to the wrapped buildings. VICINTY MAP 3 D1-3
4 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report The primary objectives of this report are as follows: 1. Perform ultimate condition hydrologic analysis considering ultimate condition land uses for City Plaza Residential. A computer hydrologic model will be developed based on drainage patterns, ground slope, ultimate condition land use, and soil type using methodology from the Orange County Hydrology Manual. 4 D1-4
5 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 2 Design Criteria This study has been prepared in conformance with the hydrological procedures and standards set forth in the Orange County Hydrology Manual, dated 1986 (including 1996 addendum). Existing condition drainage area delineation was performed utilizing survey shots for the site. Proposed condition drainage areas were developed using proposed street elevations and grades, pad elevations and proposed storm drain layout. Due to the size of the watershed (less than 640 acres), only rational method was used to calculate the peak runoff at each concentration point. 10-year and 25-year frequency storm events were used to determine the peak flow for storm drain sizing. The streets will be designed such that the 100-year frequency will be conveyed in the proposed street right of way. Point precipitation values for the 10-year 1-hour, 25-year 1-hour and 100- year 1-hour, used in the rational method analysis, were per the NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 6, Version 2. The antecedent moisture condition (AMC) used was AMC II for the 10-year and 25-year and AMC III for the 100-year analysis. City Plaza Residential land use for the ultimate condition was utilized for the entire tributary area. 5 D1-5
6 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 3 Hydrology Stormwater runoff is a function of watershed characteristics, precipitation, infiltration, and routing processes. Each of these topics is discussed briefly in the following paragraphs. City Plaza Residential drainage study follows methods and procedures found in the Orange County Hydrology Manual. 3.1 Watershed Description and Drainage Patterns Post development drainage will mimic the existing condition drainage. From a drainage standpoint, the existing site is currently providing runoff to a private storm drain located along Lewis Street, where it then enters the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel before ultimately reaching the outlet point in Huntington Harbor. 3.2 Land Use Development City Plaza Residential consists of two commercial building with surrounding parking lot. While the existing condition is considered commercial land use, for a more conservative existing condition the land use combination of public park and commercial was used to more accurately depict the 88% imperviousness of the site. The ultimate condition hydrology was performed utilizing the proposed land use of apartment, which represents an impervious value of 80% which accurately represents the imperviousness of the proposed site in the ultimate condition. 3.3 Precipitation The precipitation analysis for the study area was based upon the NOAA Atlas 14 volume 6, version 2 at latitude , and longitude (see Appendix C, Reference Materials). The 1-hour precipitation depths for City Plaza are inches, 1.02 inches and 1.31 inches for 10-year, 25-year and 100-year storm events, respectively. 6 D1-6
7 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report 3.4 Infiltration and Soils The most significant factor affecting infiltration is the nature of the soil on the watershed. Accordingly, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resource Conservation Service) classifies soils according to their infiltration capacity. Soils in the study area are classified as SCS Soil Type A and SCS Soil Type B according to the Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (see Appendix C, Reference Materials). Soils in Group A have a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. Soils in Group B have a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderate well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. Other important factors in soil infiltration are the antecedent moisture condition (AMC) and land use/soil cover. Following the methodology outlined in the Orange County Hydrology manual, an AMC II (moderate runoff potential) was assumed for events with a 10-year and 25-year return period and AMC III (highest runoff potential) for events with a 100-year return period. 3.5 Watershed Model Development City Plaza drainage study was completed using the Advance Engineering Software (AES) HydroWIN v Rational Method Analysis computer program. The computer program uses Orange County methodology to perform the hydrologic analysis of a network of watershed basins. 3.6 Design Hydrology The 10-year, 25-year and 100-year storm events were calculated for the entire watershed for the ultimate condition. Other smaller storm return period analysis may be used during local drainage design stage for catch basin sizing and lateral size determination. 7 D1-7
8 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 3 - Results 3.1 Existing Hydrology Results The results, based on the Orange County Hydrology Manual guidelines and the computer models developed using AES software, are summarized in the table below for the existing condition. The node points are illustrated on the hydrology map found in Appendix A. DA (Node) 10 YR EVENT 25 YR EVENT 100 YR EVENT Area Q (acres) 100 T c (min) Q 10 (cfs) T c (min) Q 25 (cfs) T c (min) (cfs) A (Node 10) A (Node 20) Total Proposed Hydrology Results The results, based on the Orange County Hydrology Manual guidelines and the computer models developed using AES software, are summarized in the table below for the proposed condition. The node points are illustrated on the hydrology map found in Appendix B. DA (Node) Area (acres) 10 YR EVENT 25 YR EVENT 100 YR EVENT T c (min) Q 10 (cfs) T c (min) Q 25 (cfs) T c (min) Q 100 (cfs) A (Node 10) A (Node 20) Total Conclusion The overall site imperviousness was reduced with the proposed development therefore, the volume runoff expected in the entire site was less than existing. 8 D1-8
9 References City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Manuals Orange County. (1986). Hydrology Manual. Orange County (1996 Addendum). Hydrology Manual. Software Advanced Engineering Systems. HydroWIN7 Version D1-9
10 Appendix A: EXISTING HYDROLOGY & MAP D1-10
11 D Alton Parkway Irvine, CA Phone: (949) MBAKERINTL.COM
12 623EX10.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY - 10 YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 18:18 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX10.RES * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.89 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.74 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.19 Tc(MIN.) = 6.31 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.03 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.22 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.24 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.75 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.22 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.72 Tc(MIN.) = 7.03 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-12
13 623EX10.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.70 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.70 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.22 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.57 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.04 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.55 Tc(MIN.) = 8.83 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.02 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.39 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.05 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.74 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.83 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Page 3 623EX10.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.31 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.70 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.37 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.70 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.74 Tc(MIN.) = 9.58 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.58 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.57 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.94 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.95 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.94 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.71 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-13
14 623EX10.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.71 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.47 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 8.94 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.83 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.83 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.66 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.35 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.26 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.79 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.88 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX10.RES * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.66 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.05 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.36 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.32 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.84 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.05 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-14
15 623EX10.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-15
16 623EX25.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY - 25 YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 18:14 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX25.RES * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.67 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.67 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 6.08 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.90 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.09 Tc(MIN.) = 6.21 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.77 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.09 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.36 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.17 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.67 Tc(MIN.) = 6.88 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-16
17 623EX25.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.11 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.11 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.00 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.65 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.05 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.43 Tc(MIN.) = 8.72 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.76 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.48 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.88 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.72 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Page 3 623EX25.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.87 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.4 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.74 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.35 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.69 Tc(MIN.) = 9.41 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.41 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.22 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.28 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.53 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-17
18 623EX25.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.53 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.28 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.32 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.37 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.38 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.88 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.68 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX25.RES * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.08 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.84 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.38 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.45 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.94 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.83 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.84 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.53 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.53 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-18
19 623EX25.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-19
20 623EX100.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 17:48 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX100.RES * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.15 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 7.90 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.15 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.96 Tc(MIN.) = 6.08 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.10 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.62 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 17.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.40 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.65 Tc(MIN.) = 6.73 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-20
21 623EX100.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.72 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.72 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 5.21 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.85 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.16 Tc(MIN.) = 8.45 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.94 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.21 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.19 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.45 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Page 3 623EX100.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.78 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.10 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.64 Tc(MIN.) = 9.09 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.09 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.25 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 19.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.50 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.12 Tc(MIN.) = 9.21 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-21
22 623EX100.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.21 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.95 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.95 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.32 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.40 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.50 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.99 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.49 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX100.RES * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.03 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.41 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.60 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.07 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.67 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.03 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.21 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.21 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-22
23 623EX100.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-23
24 Appendix B: PROPOSED HYDROLOGY & MAP D1-24
25 C LU B ROOM Alton Parkway Irvine, CA Phone: (949) MBAKERINTL.COM D1-25
26 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 10YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:20 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 1 D1-26 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.81 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.45 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.19 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.26 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 2
27 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.46 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.46 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.52 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.46 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.36 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.47 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.82 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 3 D1-27 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.68 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.82 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.98 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.22 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 4.82 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.19 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 4
28 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.73 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.40 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.85 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.18 Tc(MIN.) = 8.71 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.07 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.43 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.29 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.99 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 8.54 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.07 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.19 Tc(MIN.) = 8.89 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.89 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 5 D1-28 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.68 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.69 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 11.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.64 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 7.69 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.60 Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.12 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.50 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.50 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.51 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 9.50 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 6
29 STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.50 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 7 D1-29 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 8
30 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 25YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:19 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 1 D1-30 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.00 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.27 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.27 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.76 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.27 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.12 Tc(MIN.) = 9.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 2
31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.81 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.81 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.81 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.28 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.31 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.99 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 3 D1-31 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 11.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.91 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.99 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.93 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.74 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.99 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.71 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 4
32 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.62 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.42 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.25 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.95 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.12 Tc(MIN.) = 8.65 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.81 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.30 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.46 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.41 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.10 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.06 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.30 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.17 Tc(MIN.) = 8.82 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.82 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 5 D1-32 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.34 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.56 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.90 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 9.56 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.58 Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.64 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.40 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.10 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 6
33 NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.40 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 7 D1-33 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 8
34 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 100YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:18 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 1 D1-34 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.29 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.51 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.80 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.80 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.11 Tc(MIN.) = 9.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 2
35 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.34 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.34 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.18 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.34 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.19 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.60 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 3 D1-35 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.08 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 7.77 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.90 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.55 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 7.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.50 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.50 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 4
36 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 5.97 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.45 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.39 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.08 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.06 Tc(MIN.) = 8.58 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.94 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.17 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.49 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.58 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.26 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 8.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.70 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.17 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.16 Tc(MIN.) = 8.74 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.74 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 5 D1-36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.33 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.46 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.54 Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.44 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.28 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 6
37 NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.28 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 7 D1-37 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 8
38 Appendix C: REFERENCE MATERIALS D1-38
39 D1-39
40 D1-40
41 D1-41
42 D1-42
43 D1-43
Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study
Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study Hunsaker & Associates 2015 Contents 1 Scope... 1 2 Existing Conditions... 1 3 Project Description... 3 4 Methodology... 5 4.1 Hydrology... 5 4.2 Hydraulics...
More informationAPPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT
APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT UCSD LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HYDROLOGY STUDY MAY 2004 PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 10280 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD, SUITE 340 LA JOLLA, CA 92093-0965
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN April 5, 2015 Wayne W. Chang, MS, PE 46548 Chang Civil Engineering Hydrology Hydraulics Sedimentation P.O. Box 9496 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (858) 692-0760
More informationHYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT:
HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA 90731 (310) 241-2992 FOR THE PROJECT: PERRIS VALLEY COMMERCE CENTER BUILDING PERRIS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NUMBER:
More informationHYDROLOGY STUDY LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California
HYDROLOGY STUDY 12000 LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California TTM 73119 Prepared for: The Olson Company 3010 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 100 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Aaron Orenstein (562) 370-9531
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY For 34 th & J Residences 3402 J St. San Diego, CA 92102 A.P.N 545-250-08 Prepared By: Kenneth J. Discenza, P.E. Site Design Associates, Inc. 1016 Broadway, Suite A El Cajon,
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment
More informationAPPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD
7-F-1 APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD 1.0 Introduction One of the most commonly used procedures for calculating peak flows from small drainages less than 200 acres is the Rational Method. This method is most
More informationSummary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California
July 15, 2015 Bellecci & Associates, Inc Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California 1. Methodology: Method: Unit Hydrograph Software: Bentley Pond Pack Version 8i
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT To: Michael Hindle, P.E. Mark Niemiec, P.E. Project Engineer Manager of District Projects Padre Dam MWD Padre Dam MWD PD JN 214007 From: Subject:
More information6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff
October 2003, Revised February 2005 Chapter 6.0, Runoff Page 1 6.1 Introduction 6.0 Runoff The timing, peak rates of discharge, and volume of stormwater runoff are the primary considerations in the design
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any
More informationJanuary 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)
January 20, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter
More informationDrainage Analysis. Appendix E
Drainage Analysis Appendix E The existing and proposed storm drainage systems have been modeled with Bentley CivilStorm V8 computer modeling software. The peak stormwater discharge was determined for
More informationLAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS
LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS Lake County Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 N. Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 (707)263-2341 Adopted June 22, 1999 These Standards provide
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or
More informationRATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS
RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS TIME OF CONCENTRATION Study Area Rational Method Nodes Upper Elevation, ft Lower Elevation, ft Flow Length, mi Tc, min Quarry Phase 1 10 12 352.2 221 0.014 0.17 Quarry
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationIntroduction to Storm Sewer Design
A SunCam online continuing education course Introduction to Storm Sewer Design by David F. Carter Introduction Storm sewer systems are vital in collection and conveyance of stormwater from the upstream
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationAppendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study
Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study Preliminary Hydrology Study VESTING TTM 72608 Long Beach, CA Prepared for: The Long Beach Project, LLC 888 San Clemente, Suite 100 New Port Beach, CA May 28, 2014
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part 257.82 PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part
More informationPreliminary Drainage Analysis
Preliminary Drainage Analysis Tanimura and Antle Employee Housing Town of Spreckels County of Monterey, California LIB150205 May 29, 2015 Prepared For: Tanimura and Antle Produce Prepared By: 9699 Blue
More informationMaster Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area
CITY OF ANAHEIM Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area JANUARY 2006 VOLUME 1 Table of Contents VOLUME 1 1. Executive Summary... 1 1.1 General... 1 1.2
More informationPRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY
PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR Tentative Tract Map West Side of Loma Alta Drive City of Oceanside, CA Prepared For: EMERALD HILLS LLC 4272 Dogwood Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Jimmy Chen Ph:
More informationRETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE
-7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary
More informationFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED FOR: Thornton Cornerstone LLC 558 Castle Pines Parkway Suite B4-321 Castle
More informationFORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview
Chapter 5: Hydrology Standards Contents 1.0 Overview... 1 1.1 Storm Runoff Determination... 1 1.2 Design Storm Frequencies... 1 1.3 Water Quality Storm Provisions... 2 1.4 Design Storm Return Periods...
More informationAppendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report
Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL PARKING STRUCTURE 3700 Coldwater Canyon North Hollywood, CA 91604 KPFF Job # 109046 August 12, 2013 CLIENT:
More informationChapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY
Chapter 5. HYDROLOGY 5.1 Introduction The definition of hydrology is the scientific study of water and its properties, distribution, and effects on the earth s surface, in the soil and the atmosphere.
More informationLearn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS
v. 11.0 WMS 11.0 Tutorial Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS Objectives Learn how to use several Hydraulic Toolbox calculators
More informationINITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR
INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR 257.82 EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 257 and Part
More informationSECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
A. Watershed Modeling SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS An initial step in the preparation of this stormwater management plan was the selection of a stormwater simulation model to be utilized. It
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More information100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The drainage for this site has been designed to be less than the maximum allowable runoff from each basin as stated in the Overall Rigden Farm drainage plan. Table 1 compares the actual
More informationModule 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control
Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL Rainfall and Hydrology
More informationIBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project
IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project Len Wright, Ph.D., PE Lecturer, CEAE Wright.Len@gmail.com September 11, 2008 mwsw204i1.ppt/1 OUTLINE Motivation for Stormwater Management Quantity (both onsite,
More informationNames: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency
Names: ESS 315 Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency A flood is any relatively high flow of water over land that is not normally under water. Floods occur at streams and rivers but can also
More informationAppendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.
Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 23 LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROCTOR ROAD CASTRO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Owner/Developer: Hue Tran 4584 Ewing
More informationStorm Sewers, Page 2
Storm Sewers storm sewer systems are dendritic systems used to collect and direct stormwater runoff storm sewer systems are integral components of any urban infrastructure curbs, gutters and storm inlets
More informationRE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
April 12, 2016 Mr. Craig Perl, P.E. Senior Engineer City of Aurora Public Works Department 15151 E. Alameda Parkway Aurora, CO 80012 RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
More informationSTORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION 105.1. STORM DRAINS... 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS... 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method... 105.1 105.2.2.
More informationHYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006
HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationDesign Example Residential Subdivision
Design Example Residential Subdivision Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual December 2010 Public Training March 22, 2010 Richard Claytor, P.E. 508-833-6600 Appendix D: Site
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SECTION TITLE PAGE 105.1. SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method
More informationSTORMWATER HYDROLOGY
..CHAPTER.. STORMWATER HYDROLOGY 3.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods Hydrology is the science dealing with the characteristics, distribution, and movement of water on and below the earth's surface and
More informationHydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)
Hydrology Study Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Prepared for San Mateo Real Estate & Construction March 9, 21 Rev. 1 11-8-211 Rev.
More informationTechnical Memorandum
Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum To: Kathy Arnold From: Greg Hemmen, P.E. Company: Rosemont Copper Company Date:
More informationAPPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)
APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) Hydromodification design criteria for the North Orange County permit area are based on the 2- yr, 24-hr
More informationChapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall
6.0 Introduction This chapter summarizes methodology for determining rainfall and runoff information for the design of stormwater management facilities in the City. The methodology is based on the procedures
More informationLearning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:
Solomon Seyoum Learning objectives Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe: The different approaches for estimating peak runoff for urban drainage network
More informationAPPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS
APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS March 18, 2003 This page left blank intentionally. March 18, 2003 TABLES Table E.1 Table E.2 Return Frequencies for Roadway Drainage Design Rational Method
More informationAppendix B. Storm Drain System Data
MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Appendix Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data June 2017 MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 HUFFAKER ROAD (PLANT HAMMOND) PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL (HUFFAKER ROAD LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion
More information3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions
iswm TM Criteria Manual - = Not typically used or able to meet design criterion. 1 = The application and performance of proprietary commercial devices and systems must be provided by the manufacturer and
More informationJacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.
Area 5: Blackiston Mill Road at Dead Man's Hollow Flooding Assessment Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc. This document summarizes an assessment of drainage and flooding concerns and provides recommendations
More informationHydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021
Hydrology Study For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Prepared for Daryl Priest - Priest Development Corporation 124 West Main Street,
More informationDecember 6, Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229
December 6, 2016 Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 RE: Drainage Conformance Letter Hilton Garden Inn @ The Grove The Grove Filing No 1, lot 5E Thornton,
More informationEngineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has updated the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Finney County, including the City of
More informationExample 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)
Chapter 10 Design Examples Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond) Example 2: Filter Design in a commercial development
More informationRational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT
Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel Harlan H. Bengtson, PhD, P.E. COURSE CONTENT 1. Introduction Calculation of peak storm water runoff rate from a drainage area is often done with the
More informationTable of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff
CHAPTER Table of Contents 2 Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis 2.1 Estimating Runoff 2.1.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods...2.1-1 2.1.2 Symbols and Definitions...2.1-4 2.1.3 Rainfall Estimation...2.1-5
More informationAPPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS
ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS June 2011 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. June 2011 TABLES Table E.1 Table E.2 Return Frequencies for Roadway Drainage Design Rational Method Values June 2011
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 PLANT BOWEN PRIVATE INDUSTRY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY (ASH LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals
More informationAPPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
Storm Drainage 13-G-1 APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE 1.0 Introduction The hydraulic grade line is used to aid the designer in determining the acceptability of a proposed or evaluation of an existing storm
More informationSAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I
SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I Banning, CA DRAINAGE STUDY June 16, 2010 Reference 106-195 PREPARED BY: Encompass Associates, Inc. 5699 Cousins Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 909-684-0093 Fax-909-586-6979
More informationCUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER DRAINAGE MANUAL Supplement to O.D.O.T. LOCATION and DESIGN MANUAL, Volume 2, Drainage Design, Section 1000 and 1100 May 28, 2010 Revisions to the July 29, 2009 edition are noted
More informationContents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek
Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Contents SITE LOCATION / DESCRIPTION... 3 WESTPOINTE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN... 3 THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE DETENTION POND... 3 Table
More informationSECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE
4.01 GENERAL SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE These standards shall provide minimum requirements for the design of Storm Drainage and related appurtenances within the City of West Sacramento rights of way and
More informationLIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv. Section 1 - Introduction Purpose of Study... 1
Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis for Alberhill Villages April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Name Page Number LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv Section 1 - Introduction...
More informationHydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis
Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Prepared for: City of Vista, California August 18, 2006 Tory R. Walker, R.C.E. 45005 President W.O. 116-01 01/23/2007 Table of Contents Page
More informationThe site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent.
March 3, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter Dear
More informationChapter 3 Dispersion BMPs
Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs 3.1 BMP L611 Concentrated Flow Dispersion 3.1.1 Purpose and Definition Dispersion of concentrated flows from driveways or other pavement through a vegetated pervious area attenuates
More informationAPPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary
APPENDIX J-3 Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary Stormwater Management & Treatment Facilities Design Summary INTRODUCTION KPFF Consulting Engineers has compiled this report
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationDRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL
MAY 10, 2016 DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL Connor Klein, Jiangnan Yi, Yuzhi Zhang, Yi Yang NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY NAU Water Buffalo Engineering Table
More informationNovember 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
November 21, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report
More informationDESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID PLAN)
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ( PLAN) ALAMITOS BEACH CONCESSION BUILDING 780 E. SHORELINE DRIVE LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Long Beach Public Works 333 W. Ocean
More informationSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Silvercreek Junction STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek at the Silvercreek Parkway Site Guelph, Ontario August, 2008 TSH File 22304A-04 August 19, 2008 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek
More informationMODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation
Watershed MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1 A watershed is an area of land thaaptures rainfall and other precipitation and funnels it to a lake or stream or wetland. The area within the watershed
More informationAstra Engineering LLC
Astra Engineering LLC!"#$#% &'( ) *) ) *)* +## ) ',#$$+-."$% "#"-",-/$+ 0 ) )1'(0 23** ) 243 5*6 78947)3 9**!:;24?)3* 973''!"$#%=4? *9> %-2/- 2+ @:* 3*$/A 2 32 @3*49 13* 32 3-3*-* 2!!2 3*!*!2
More informationPreliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report
Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report MGA Chatsworth Campus 20000 Prairie Street Chatsworth, CA TUSTIN 17782 17th Street Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780-1947 714.665.4500 Fax 714.665.4501 LOS ANGELES
More informationHighway Surface Drainage
Highway Surface Drainage R obert D. M iles, Research Engineer Joint Highway Research Project, and Assistant Professor of Highway Engineering, School of Civil Engineering Purdue University IN T R O D U
More informationiswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:
: 1.0 2.0 Downstream Assessment 3.0 Streambank Protection 4.0 Water Balance 5.0 Rainfall Tables 6.0 Hydrologic Soils Data Table of Contents 1.0... HO-1 1.1 Estimating Runoff... HO-1 1.1.1 Introduction
More informationPonds Planning, Design, Construction
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ponds Planning, Design, Construction Agriculture Handbook Number 590 Estimating storm runoff The amount of precipitation,
More informationDRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT OLD DENVER ROAD
DRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT 16140 OLD DENVER ROAD PART OF THE NW1/4 SEC. 28, T.11S., R.67W., 6 th P.M. EL PASO COUNTY February 3, 2017 Revised January 5, 2018 Prepared for All About Outdoor Storage Oliver
More informationDesign of Stormwater Wetlands
Hydraulic & Hydrologic Stormwater Engineering Design of Stormwater Wetlands Jon Hathaway, EI Extension Associate NCSU Bio. And Ag. Engineering 6 Step Process 1. Watershed Analysis (Runoff Volume and Peak
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY PREPARED FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT JULY 2014 BY ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, INC. ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, Inc Established
More informationSTORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL
Appendix I STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL by: SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. GEN ERAL DESIGN STAN DARDS AN D POLICIES 1. STREET AND LOCAL DRAINAGE Discharge estimates for specified design storms shall be calculated
More informationPART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA
PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement
More informationPART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA
PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY FOR Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA OWNER: Touchstone Communities 12700 Stowe Drive, Suite 130 Poway, CA 92064 858-586-0414 ENGINEER: MASSON & ASSOCIATES,
More informationTable of Contents. Overview... 1
Table of Contents Overview... 1 Rainfall... 2 3-2-1 Rainfall Depths and Intensities... 3 3-2-2 Design Storm Distribution for use with Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP)... 5 3-2-3 Temporal Distribution...
More informationStorm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg
Storm Sewer Design Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg Major floods are dramatic and water flow routes must be recognized when minor drainage systems fail. These types
More informationStormwater Analysis Report
Stormwater Analysis Report Solar Panel Array Temple Street (Rt. 14) West Boylston, MA February 24, 216 SITE Prepared for: West Boylston Municipal Lighting Plant 4 Crescent Street West Boylston, MA 1583
More informationDRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name: Firm Name: Map ID: Engineer: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Property Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Reviewed By: Date Received: Date Accepted for Review: The following
More informationAppendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008
Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR This Page Left Intentionally Blank OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR APPENDIX I PAGE 1 Appendix II OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR This Page Left
More informationFinal Drainage Report
Thornton Electric Substation Project Final Drainage Report December 14, 2016 DRAFT Prepared for: Xcel Energy, 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado 80202 Prepared by: 350 Indiana Street, Suite
More informationCHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF
CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF 3.1.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods...3.1-1 3.1.2 Symbols and Definitions...3.1-3 3.1.3 Rainfall
More informationHYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR
HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description and Location Isabella Ocean Residences is a residential development to be constructed
More information