City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report"

Transcription

1 Hydrology Study City Plaza Residential (TPM ) Preliminary Hydrology Report Orange, Orange County, California Prepared For: Greenlaw Partners Von Karman Avenue, Suite 250 Irvine, CA Prepared By: Contact Person: Scott P. Gilbert, P.E. MBI JN July 18, 2016 D1-1

2 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Table of Contents Section 1 - Introduction General Introduction... 3 Section 2 Design Criteria... 5 Section 3 Hydrology Watershed Description and Drainage Patterns Land Use Development Precipitation Infiltration and Soils Watershed Model Development Design Hydrology... 7 Section 3 - Results Existing Hydrology Results Proposed Hydrology Results Conclusion... 8 Appendix A: Existing Hydrology Calculations & Map Appendix B: Proposed Hydrology Calculations & Map Appendix C: Reference Materials 2 D1-2

3 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 1 - Introduction 1.1 General Introduction The 8.62 acre site is located at 1 City Boulevard in Orange, California which is situated southwest of the Block of Orange development along City Boulevard. The project site, designated land use Urban Mixed Use, is bounded by the parking lots to the north, to the south, City Boulevard to the east, and South Lewis Street to the West. The site is relatively level with an approximate maximum elevation difference of 2 feet sloping down to the southwest. Currently, the site is developed with a multi-story commercial building situated on the southeastern portion of the site. The site is bounded on all sides with asphalt parking, drive aisles, and roadways. Some minor landscaping is present along the property lines and within the parking aisles. The proposed development will consist of a 5-story residential building wrapped around a 7-story parking structure and an additional 6.5-level parking structure is proposed toward the central portion of the property, where one level of parking is below grade for this structure. The existing multi-story commercial building will be preserved in the southeastern portion of the site while the remaining areas will become access roads to these elements. Proposed drive aisles will utilize a combination of asphalt and concrete pavers while common areas will utilize concrete, turf, and landscaping. Waste generated will be typical of a residential and commercial community. Some amenities included are a pool deck, pool building, lobby, and a courtyard located central to the wrapped buildings. VICINTY MAP 3 D1-3

4 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report The primary objectives of this report are as follows: 1. Perform ultimate condition hydrologic analysis considering ultimate condition land uses for City Plaza Residential. A computer hydrologic model will be developed based on drainage patterns, ground slope, ultimate condition land use, and soil type using methodology from the Orange County Hydrology Manual. 4 D1-4

5 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 2 Design Criteria This study has been prepared in conformance with the hydrological procedures and standards set forth in the Orange County Hydrology Manual, dated 1986 (including 1996 addendum). Existing condition drainage area delineation was performed utilizing survey shots for the site. Proposed condition drainage areas were developed using proposed street elevations and grades, pad elevations and proposed storm drain layout. Due to the size of the watershed (less than 640 acres), only rational method was used to calculate the peak runoff at each concentration point. 10-year and 25-year frequency storm events were used to determine the peak flow for storm drain sizing. The streets will be designed such that the 100-year frequency will be conveyed in the proposed street right of way. Point precipitation values for the 10-year 1-hour, 25-year 1-hour and 100- year 1-hour, used in the rational method analysis, were per the NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 6, Version 2. The antecedent moisture condition (AMC) used was AMC II for the 10-year and 25-year and AMC III for the 100-year analysis. City Plaza Residential land use for the ultimate condition was utilized for the entire tributary area. 5 D1-5

6 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 3 Hydrology Stormwater runoff is a function of watershed characteristics, precipitation, infiltration, and routing processes. Each of these topics is discussed briefly in the following paragraphs. City Plaza Residential drainage study follows methods and procedures found in the Orange County Hydrology Manual. 3.1 Watershed Description and Drainage Patterns Post development drainage will mimic the existing condition drainage. From a drainage standpoint, the existing site is currently providing runoff to a private storm drain located along Lewis Street, where it then enters the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel before ultimately reaching the outlet point in Huntington Harbor. 3.2 Land Use Development City Plaza Residential consists of two commercial building with surrounding parking lot. While the existing condition is considered commercial land use, for a more conservative existing condition the land use combination of public park and commercial was used to more accurately depict the 88% imperviousness of the site. The ultimate condition hydrology was performed utilizing the proposed land use of apartment, which represents an impervious value of 80% which accurately represents the imperviousness of the proposed site in the ultimate condition. 3.3 Precipitation The precipitation analysis for the study area was based upon the NOAA Atlas 14 volume 6, version 2 at latitude , and longitude (see Appendix C, Reference Materials). The 1-hour precipitation depths for City Plaza are inches, 1.02 inches and 1.31 inches for 10-year, 25-year and 100-year storm events, respectively. 6 D1-6

7 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report 3.4 Infiltration and Soils The most significant factor affecting infiltration is the nature of the soil on the watershed. Accordingly, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (now the Natural Resource Conservation Service) classifies soils according to their infiltration capacity. Soils in the study area are classified as SCS Soil Type A and SCS Soil Type B according to the Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (see Appendix C, Reference Materials). Soils in Group A have a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. Soils in Group B have a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderate well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. Other important factors in soil infiltration are the antecedent moisture condition (AMC) and land use/soil cover. Following the methodology outlined in the Orange County Hydrology manual, an AMC II (moderate runoff potential) was assumed for events with a 10-year and 25-year return period and AMC III (highest runoff potential) for events with a 100-year return period. 3.5 Watershed Model Development City Plaza drainage study was completed using the Advance Engineering Software (AES) HydroWIN v Rational Method Analysis computer program. The computer program uses Orange County methodology to perform the hydrologic analysis of a network of watershed basins. 3.6 Design Hydrology The 10-year, 25-year and 100-year storm events were calculated for the entire watershed for the ultimate condition. Other smaller storm return period analysis may be used during local drainage design stage for catch basin sizing and lateral size determination. 7 D1-7

8 City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Section 3 - Results 3.1 Existing Hydrology Results The results, based on the Orange County Hydrology Manual guidelines and the computer models developed using AES software, are summarized in the table below for the existing condition. The node points are illustrated on the hydrology map found in Appendix A. DA (Node) 10 YR EVENT 25 YR EVENT 100 YR EVENT Area Q (acres) 100 T c (min) Q 10 (cfs) T c (min) Q 25 (cfs) T c (min) (cfs) A (Node 10) A (Node 20) Total Proposed Hydrology Results The results, based on the Orange County Hydrology Manual guidelines and the computer models developed using AES software, are summarized in the table below for the proposed condition. The node points are illustrated on the hydrology map found in Appendix B. DA (Node) Area (acres) 10 YR EVENT 25 YR EVENT 100 YR EVENT T c (min) Q 10 (cfs) T c (min) Q 25 (cfs) T c (min) Q 100 (cfs) A (Node 10) A (Node 20) Total Conclusion The overall site imperviousness was reduced with the proposed development therefore, the volume runoff expected in the entire site was less than existing. 8 D1-8

9 References City Plaza Residential Orange, CA Preliminary Hydrology Report Manuals Orange County. (1986). Hydrology Manual. Orange County (1996 Addendum). Hydrology Manual. Software Advanced Engineering Systems. HydroWIN7 Version D1-9

10 Appendix A: EXISTING HYDROLOGY & MAP D1-10

11 D Alton Parkway Irvine, CA Phone: (949) MBAKERINTL.COM

12 623EX10.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY - 10 YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 18:18 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX10.RES * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.89 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.74 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.19 Tc(MIN.) = 6.31 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.03 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.22 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.24 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.75 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.22 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.72 Tc(MIN.) = 7.03 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-12

13 623EX10.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.70 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.70 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.22 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.57 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.04 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.55 Tc(MIN.) = 8.83 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.02 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.39 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.05 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.74 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.83 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Page 3 623EX10.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.31 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.70 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.37 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.70 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.74 Tc(MIN.) = 9.58 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.58 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.57 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.94 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.95 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.94 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.71 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-13

14 623EX10.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.71 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.47 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 8.94 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.83 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.83 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.66 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.35 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.26 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.79 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.88 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX10.RES * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.66 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.05 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.36 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.32 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.84 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.05 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-14

15 623EX10.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-15

16 623EX25.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY - 25 YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 18:14 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX25.RES * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.67 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.67 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 6.08 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.90 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.09 Tc(MIN.) = 6.21 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.77 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.09 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.36 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.17 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.67 Tc(MIN.) = 6.88 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-16

17 623EX25.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.11 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.11 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.00 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.65 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.05 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.43 Tc(MIN.) = 8.72 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.76 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.48 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.88 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.72 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Page 3 623EX25.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.87 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.35 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.4 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.74 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.35 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.69 Tc(MIN.) = 9.41 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.41 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.22 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.28 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.53 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-17

18 623EX25.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.53 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.28 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.32 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.37 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.38 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.88 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.68 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX25.RES * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.08 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.84 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.38 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.45 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.94 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.83 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.84 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.53 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.53 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.48 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-18

19 623EX25.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-19

20 623EX100.RES RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 06/01/2013 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: G:\151623EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 17:48 06/21/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = Page 1 623EX100.RES * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.42 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.15 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 7.90 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.15 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.96 Tc(MIN.) = 6.08 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.48 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.10 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.62 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 17.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.40 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.65 Tc(MIN.) = 6.73 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 Page 2 D1-20

21 623EX100.RES >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.72 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.72 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 51 >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = CHANNEL SLOPE = CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = "Z" FACTOR = MANNING'S FACTOR = MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 5.21 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.85 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.06 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.16 Tc(MIN.) = 8.45 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.31 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.94 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.21 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.19 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.45 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Page 3 623EX100.RES COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.32 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.00 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.78 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.92 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.37 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.10 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.64 Tc(MIN.) = 9.09 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.30 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.30 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.09 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A COMMERCIAL B PUBLIC PARK B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.25 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.1 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 19.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.50 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.12 Tc(MIN.) = 9.21 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. Page 4 D1-21

22 623EX100.RES FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.21 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.95 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.73 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.95 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.32 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.40 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.50 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.99 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.49 Tc(MIN.) = Page 5 623EX100.RES * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): COMMERCIAL A PUBLIC PARK A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.84 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.71 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.03 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.41 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.60 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.07 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.67 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.12 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.29 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.57 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.03 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.12) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.21 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.21 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 5.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.09 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Page 6 D1-22

23 623EX100.RES ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.09) ( 0.09) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 D1-23

24 Appendix B: PROPOSED HYDROLOGY & MAP D1-24

25 C LU B ROOM Alton Parkway Irvine, CA Phone: (949) MBAKERINTL.COM D1-25

26 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 10YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:20 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 1 D1-26 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.81 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.45 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.19 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.26 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 2

27 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.46 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.46 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.52 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.46 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.36 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.47 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.82 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 3 D1-27 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.68 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.82 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.98 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.22 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 4.82 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.19 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 4

28 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.73 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.40 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.85 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.18 Tc(MIN.) = 8.71 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.07 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.43 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.29 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.99 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 8.54 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.07 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.19 Tc(MIN.) = 8.89 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.89 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 5 D1-28 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.68 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.69 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 11.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.64 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 7.69 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.60 Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.12 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.50 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.50 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.51 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 9.50 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 6

29 STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.50 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.50 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 7 D1-29 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR10.RES Page 8

30 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 25YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:19 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 1 D1-30 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.00 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.27 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.27 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.76 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.27 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.12 Tc(MIN.) = 9.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 2

31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.81 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.81 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.81 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.81 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.28 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.31 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.99 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 3 D1-31 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 11.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.91 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.99 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.93 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.74 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.99 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.71 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 4

32 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.62 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.42 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.25 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.95 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.12 Tc(MIN.) = 8.65 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.81 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.30 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.46 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.41 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.10 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.06 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.30 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.17 Tc(MIN.) = 8.82 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.82 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 5 D1-32 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.34 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.56 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.90 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 9.56 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.58 Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.64 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.40 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.10 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 6

33 NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.40 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.40 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 7 D1-33 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR25.RES Page 8

34 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver Release Date: 07/01/2011 License ID 1264 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CITY PLAZA RESIDENTIAL * * PROPOSED HYDROLOGY - 100YR STORM EVENT * * * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: PR.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 20:18 07/18/2016 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *USER-DEFINED LOGARITHMIC INTERPOLATION USED FOR RAINFALL* SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE(LOG(I;IN/HR) vs. LOG(Tc;MIN)) = USER SPECIFIED 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= /0.018/ GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 1 D1-34 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.29 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE 1.10 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.15 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.51 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.35 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.80 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.10 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.80 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.11 Tc(MIN.) = 9.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.10 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 2

35 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.34 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.66 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.34 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.10 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.18 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.34 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.19 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 2.20 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE 2.20 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.70 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.60 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.20 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 3 D1-35 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 14.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.08 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 7.77 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.90 Tc(MIN.) = LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.55 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.34 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 7.77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.40 IS CODE = 21 >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): Tc (MIN.) APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.50 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.50 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.40 TO NODE 2.50 IS CODE = 62 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STREET TABLE SECTION # 1 USED)<<<<< UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = STREET LENGTH(FEET) = CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 8.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 4

36 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 STREET PARKWAY CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Back-of-Walk Flow Section = **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 5.97 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.45 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.39 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.08 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.06 Tc(MIN.) = 8.58 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.94 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.20 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.17 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.49 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.58 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.26 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.50 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.50 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 8.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.70 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.17 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.16 Tc(MIN.) = 8.74 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE 2.60 = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE 2.60 IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 8.74 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 5 D1-36 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.18 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.33 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.38 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.60 TO NODE IS CODE = 31 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = MANNING'S N = DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 13.7 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.46 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.54 Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.30 TO NODE = FEET. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 81 >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): APARTMENTS A APARTMENTS B SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.97 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.44 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE TO NODE IS CODE = 1 >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.28 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.01 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.39 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 4.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 6

37 NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.07) ( 0.08) RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE = FEET. END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.7 TC(MIN.) = 9.28 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 6.27 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.38 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE ( 0.08) ( 0.08) END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 7 D1-37 Date: 07/18/2016 File name: 623PR100.RES Page 8

38 Appendix C: REFERENCE MATERIALS D1-38

39 D1-39

40 D1-40

41 D1-41

42 D1-42

43 D1-43

Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study

Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study Hunsaker & Associates 2015 Contents 1 Scope... 1 2 Existing Conditions... 1 3 Project Description... 3 4 Methodology... 5 4.1 Hydrology... 5 4.2 Hydraulics...

More information

APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT

APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT APPENDIX F HYDROLOGY REPORT UCSD LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HYDROLOGY STUDY MAY 2004 PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 10280 NORTH TORREY PINES ROAD, SUITE 340 LA JOLLA, CA 92093-0965

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN April 5, 2015 Wayne W. Chang, MS, PE 46548 Chang Civil Engineering Hydrology Hydraulics Sedimentation P.O. Box 9496 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (858) 692-0760

More information

HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT:

HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA (310) FOR THE PROJECT: HYDROLOGY STUDY PREPARED FOR: MARKHAM PERRIS LLC 302 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 103 SAN PEDRO, CA 90731 (310) 241-2992 FOR THE PROJECT: PERRIS VALLEY COMMERCE CENTER BUILDING PERRIS, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NUMBER:

More information

HYDROLOGY STUDY LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California

HYDROLOGY STUDY LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California HYDROLOGY STUDY 12000 LA MIRADA BOULEVARD La Mirada, California TTM 73119 Prepared for: The Olson Company 3010 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 100 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Aaron Orenstein (562) 370-9531

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY For 34 th & J Residences 3402 J St. San Diego, CA 92102 A.P.N 545-250-08 Prepared By: Kenneth J. Discenza, P.E. Site Design Associates, Inc. 1016 Broadway, Suite A El Cajon,

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment

More information

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD 7-F-1 APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD 1.0 Introduction One of the most commonly used procedures for calculating peak flows from small drainages less than 200 acres is the Rational Method. This method is most

More information

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California July 15, 2015 Bellecci & Associates, Inc Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California 1. Methodology: Method: Unit Hydrograph Software: Bentley Pond Pack Version 8i

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (TM) UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT To: Michael Hindle, P.E. Mark Niemiec, P.E. Project Engineer Manager of District Projects Padre Dam MWD Padre Dam MWD PD JN 214007 From: Subject:

More information

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff October 2003, Revised February 2005 Chapter 6.0, Runoff Page 1 6.1 Introduction 6.0 Runoff The timing, peak rates of discharge, and volume of stormwater runoff are the primary considerations in the design

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any

More information

January 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)

January 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) January 20, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter

More information

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E Drainage Analysis Appendix E The existing and proposed storm drainage systems have been modeled with Bentley CivilStorm V8 computer modeling software. The peak stormwater discharge was determined for

More information

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS Lake County Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 N. Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 (707)263-2341 Adopted June 22, 1999 These Standards provide

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or

More information

RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS

RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS RATIONAL METHOD INPUT PARAMETERS TIME OF CONCENTRATION Study Area Rational Method Nodes Upper Elevation, ft Lower Elevation, ft Flow Length, mi Tc, min Quarry Phase 1 10 12 352.2 221 0.014 0.17 Quarry

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.

More information

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design

Introduction to Storm Sewer Design A SunCam online continuing education course Introduction to Storm Sewer Design by David F. Carter Introduction Storm sewer systems are vital in collection and conveyance of stormwater from the upstream

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.

More information

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study Preliminary Hydrology Study VESTING TTM 72608 Long Beach, CA Prepared for: The Long Beach Project, LLC 888 San Clemente, Suite 100 New Port Beach, CA May 28, 2014

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part 257.82 PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part

More information

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Preliminary Drainage Analysis Preliminary Drainage Analysis Tanimura and Antle Employee Housing Town of Spreckels County of Monterey, California LIB150205 May 29, 2015 Prepared For: Tanimura and Antle Produce Prepared By: 9699 Blue

More information

Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area

Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area CITY OF ANAHEIM Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area JANUARY 2006 VOLUME 1 Table of Contents VOLUME 1 1. Executive Summary... 1 1.1 General... 1 1.2

More information

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY

PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR Tentative Tract Map West Side of Loma Alta Drive City of Oceanside, CA Prepared For: EMERALD HILLS LLC 4272 Dogwood Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Contact: Mr. Jimmy Chen Ph:

More information

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE -7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary

More information

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CORNERSTONE RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE FILING NO. 1 CITY OF THORNTON, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED FOR: Thornton Cornerstone LLC 558 Castle Pines Parkway Suite B4-321 Castle

More information

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview Chapter 5: Hydrology Standards Contents 1.0 Overview... 1 1.1 Storm Runoff Determination... 1 1.2 Design Storm Frequencies... 1 1.3 Water Quality Storm Provisions... 2 1.4 Design Storm Return Periods...

More information

Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report

Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report Appendix E.2 Preliminary Hydrology Report PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY HARVARD WESTLAKE SCHOOL PARKING STRUCTURE 3700 Coldwater Canyon North Hollywood, CA 91604 KPFF Job # 109046 August 12, 2013 CLIENT:

More information

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY Chapter 5. HYDROLOGY 5.1 Introduction The definition of hydrology is the scientific study of water and its properties, distribution, and effects on the earth s surface, in the soil and the atmosphere.

More information

Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS

Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS v. 11.0 WMS 11.0 Tutorial Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS Objectives Learn how to use several Hydraulic Toolbox calculators

More information

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR 257.82 EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 257 and Part

More information

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS A. Watershed Modeling SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS An initial step in the preparation of this stormwater management plan was the selection of a stormwater simulation model to be utilized. It

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.

More information

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals

100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The drainage for this site has been designed to be less than the maximum allowable runoff from each basin as stated in the Overall Rigden Farm drainage plan. Table 1 compares the actual

More information

Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control

Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL Rainfall and Hydrology

More information

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project Len Wright, Ph.D., PE Lecturer, CEAE Wright.Len@gmail.com September 11, 2008 mwsw204i1.ppt/1 OUTLINE Motivation for Stormwater Management Quantity (both onsite,

More information

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency Names: ESS 315 Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency A flood is any relatively high flow of water over land that is not normally under water. Floods occur at streams and rivers but can also

More information

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 23 LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROCTOR ROAD CASTRO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Owner/Developer: Hue Tran 4584 Ewing

More information

Storm Sewers, Page 2

Storm Sewers, Page 2 Storm Sewers storm sewer systems are dendritic systems used to collect and direct stormwater runoff storm sewer systems are integral components of any urban infrastructure curbs, gutters and storm inlets

More information

RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016

RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016 April 12, 2016 Mr. Craig Perl, P.E. Senior Engineer City of Aurora Public Works Department 15151 E. Alameda Parkway Aurora, CO 80012 RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016

More information

STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION

STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION 105.1. STORM DRAINS... 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS... 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method... 105.1 105.2.2.

More information

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006 HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Design Example Residential Subdivision

Design Example Residential Subdivision Design Example Residential Subdivision Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual December 2010 Public Training March 22, 2010 Richard Claytor, P.E. 508-833-6600 Appendix D: Site

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SECTION TITLE PAGE 105.1. SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method

More information

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY ..CHAPTER.. STORMWATER HYDROLOGY 3.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods Hydrology is the science dealing with the characteristics, distribution, and movement of water on and below the earth's surface and

More information

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Hydrology Study Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Prepared for San Mateo Real Estate & Construction March 9, 21 Rev. 1 11-8-211 Rev.

More information

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum To: Kathy Arnold From: Greg Hemmen, P.E. Company: Rosemont Copper Company Date:

More information

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY) Hydromodification design criteria for the North Orange County permit area are based on the 2- yr, 24-hr

More information

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall 6.0 Introduction This chapter summarizes methodology for determining rainfall and runoff information for the design of stormwater management facilities in the City. The methodology is based on the procedures

More information

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe: Solomon Seyoum Learning objectives Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe: The different approaches for estimating peak runoff for urban drainage network

More information

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS March 18, 2003 This page left blank intentionally. March 18, 2003 TABLES Table E.1 Table E.2 Return Frequencies for Roadway Drainage Design Rational Method

More information

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Appendix Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data June 2017 MENIFEE VALLEY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN FINAL EIR MT. SAN JACINTO

More information

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257 INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 HUFFAKER ROAD (PLANT HAMMOND) PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL (HUFFAKER ROAD LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion

More information

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions iswm TM Criteria Manual - = Not typically used or able to meet design criterion. 1 = The application and performance of proprietary commercial devices and systems must be provided by the manufacturer and

More information

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.

Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc. Area 5: Blackiston Mill Road at Dead Man's Hollow Flooding Assessment Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc. This document summarizes an assessment of drainage and flooding concerns and provides recommendations

More information

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021

Hydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Hydrology Study For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Prepared for Daryl Priest - Priest Development Corporation 124 West Main Street,

More information

December 6, Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229

December 6, Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 December 6, 2016 Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 RE: Drainage Conformance Letter Hilton Garden Inn @ The Grove The Grove Filing No 1, lot 5E Thornton,

More information

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary Executive Summary Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has updated the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Finney County, including the City of

More information

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond) Chapter 10 Design Examples Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond) Example 2: Filter Design in a commercial development

More information

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel Harlan H. Bengtson, PhD, P.E. COURSE CONTENT 1. Introduction Calculation of peak storm water runoff rate from a drainage area is often done with the

More information

Table of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff

Table of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff CHAPTER Table of Contents 2 Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis 2.1 Estimating Runoff 2.1.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods...2.1-1 2.1.2 Symbols and Definitions...2.1-4 2.1.3 Rainfall Estimation...2.1-5

More information

APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS

APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS June 2011 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. June 2011 TABLES Table E.1 Table E.2 Return Frequencies for Roadway Drainage Design Rational Method Values June 2011

More information

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257 INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 PLANT BOWEN PRIVATE INDUSTRY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY (ASH LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals

More information

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE Storm Drainage 13-G-1 APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE 1.0 Introduction The hydraulic grade line is used to aid the designer in determining the acceptability of a proposed or evaluation of an existing storm

More information

SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I

SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I Banning, CA DRAINAGE STUDY June 16, 2010 Reference 106-195 PREPARED BY: Encompass Associates, Inc. 5699 Cousins Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 909-684-0093 Fax-909-586-6979

More information

CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER

CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER CUYAHOGA COUNTY ENGINEER DRAINAGE MANUAL Supplement to O.D.O.T. LOCATION and DESIGN MANUAL, Volume 2, Drainage Design, Section 1000 and 1100 May 28, 2010 Revisions to the July 29, 2009 edition are noted

More information

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek

Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Contents SITE LOCATION / DESCRIPTION... 3 WESTPOINTE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN... 3 THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE DETENTION POND... 3 Table

More information

SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE

SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE 4.01 GENERAL SECTION 4 STORM DRAINAGE These standards shall provide minimum requirements for the design of Storm Drainage and related appurtenances within the City of West Sacramento rights of way and

More information

LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv. Section 1 - Introduction Purpose of Study... 1

LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv. Section 1 - Introduction Purpose of Study... 1 Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis for Alberhill Villages April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Name Page Number LIST OF TABLES... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF APPENDICES... iv Section 1 - Introduction...

More information

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis Prepared for: City of Vista, California August 18, 2006 Tory R. Walker, R.C.E. 45005 President W.O. 116-01 01/23/2007 Table of Contents Page

More information

The site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent.

The site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent. March 3, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter Dear

More information

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs 3.1 BMP L611 Concentrated Flow Dispersion 3.1.1 Purpose and Definition Dispersion of concentrated flows from driveways or other pavement through a vegetated pervious area attenuates

More information

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary

APPENDIX J-3. Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary APPENDIX J-3 Orcem Stormwater Management and Treatment Facilities Design Summary Stormwater Management & Treatment Facilities Design Summary INTRODUCTION KPFF Consulting Engineers has compiled this report

More information

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.

More information

DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL

DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL MAY 10, 2016 DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL Connor Klein, Jiangnan Yi, Yuzhi Zhang, Yi Yang NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY NAU Water Buffalo Engineering Table

More information

November 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

November 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report November 21, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report

More information

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID PLAN)

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (LID PLAN) DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY REPORT & LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ( PLAN) ALAMITOS BEACH CONCESSION BUILDING 780 E. SHORELINE DRIVE LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Long Beach Public Works 333 W. Ocean

More information

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Silvercreek Junction STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek at the Silvercreek Parkway Site Guelph, Ontario August, 2008 TSH File 22304A-04 August 19, 2008 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Howitt Creek

More information

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation Watershed MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1 A watershed is an area of land thaaptures rainfall and other precipitation and funnels it to a lake or stream or wetland. The area within the watershed

More information

Astra Engineering LLC

Astra Engineering LLC Astra Engineering LLC!"#$#% &'( ) *) ) *)* +## ) ',#$$+-."$% "#"-",-/$+ 0 ) )1'(0 23** ) 243 5*6 78947)3 9**!:;24?)3* 973''!"$#%=4? *9> %-2/- 2+ @:* 3*$/A 2 32 @3*49 13* 32 3-3*-* 2!!2 3*!*!2

More information

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report MGA Chatsworth Campus 20000 Prairie Street Chatsworth, CA TUSTIN 17782 17th Street Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780-1947 714.665.4500 Fax 714.665.4501 LOS ANGELES

More information

Highway Surface Drainage

Highway Surface Drainage Highway Surface Drainage R obert D. M iles, Research Engineer Joint Highway Research Project, and Assistant Professor of Highway Engineering, School of Civil Engineering Purdue University IN T R O D U

More information

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology: : 1.0 2.0 Downstream Assessment 3.0 Streambank Protection 4.0 Water Balance 5.0 Rainfall Tables 6.0 Hydrologic Soils Data Table of Contents 1.0... HO-1 1.1 Estimating Runoff... HO-1 1.1.1 Introduction

More information

Ponds Planning, Design, Construction

Ponds Planning, Design, Construction United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ponds Planning, Design, Construction Agriculture Handbook Number 590 Estimating storm runoff The amount of precipitation,

More information

DRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT OLD DENVER ROAD

DRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT OLD DENVER ROAD DRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT 16140 OLD DENVER ROAD PART OF THE NW1/4 SEC. 28, T.11S., R.67W., 6 th P.M. EL PASO COUNTY February 3, 2017 Revised January 5, 2018 Prepared for All About Outdoor Storage Oliver

More information

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

Design of Stormwater Wetlands Hydraulic & Hydrologic Stormwater Engineering Design of Stormwater Wetlands Jon Hathaway, EI Extension Associate NCSU Bio. And Ag. Engineering 6 Step Process 1. Watershed Analysis (Runoff Volume and Peak

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY PREPARED FOR THE NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT JULY 2014 BY ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, INC. ROSEVILLE DESIGN GROUP, Inc Established

More information

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL Appendix I STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL by: SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. GEN ERAL DESIGN STAN DARDS AN D POLICIES 1. STREET AND LOCAL DRAINAGE Discharge estimates for specified design storms shall be calculated

More information

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement

More information

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA

PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA PART V - STORM DRAIN DESIGN CRITERIA A. Hydrology Studies and Hydraulic Analyses 1. Drainage area master plans and calculations are to be submitted with all subdivision improvement plans, permit improvement

More information

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY. Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY FOR Del Prado 2329 CENTRE CITY PARKWAY ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA OWNER: Touchstone Communities 12700 Stowe Drive, Suite 130 Poway, CA 92064 858-586-0414 ENGINEER: MASSON & ASSOCIATES,

More information

Table of Contents. Overview... 1

Table of Contents. Overview... 1 Table of Contents Overview... 1 Rainfall... 2 3-2-1 Rainfall Depths and Intensities... 3 3-2-2 Design Storm Distribution for use with Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP)... 5 3-2-3 Temporal Distribution...

More information

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg

Storm Sewer Design. Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg Storm Sewer Design Bob Pitt University of Alabama and Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg Major floods are dramatic and water flow routes must be recognized when minor drainage systems fail. These types

More information

Stormwater Analysis Report

Stormwater Analysis Report Stormwater Analysis Report Solar Panel Array Temple Street (Rt. 14) West Boylston, MA February 24, 216 SITE Prepared for: West Boylston Municipal Lighting Plant 4 Crescent Street West Boylston, MA 1583

More information

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Firm Name: Map ID: Engineer: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Property Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Reviewed By: Date Received: Date Accepted for Review: The following

More information

Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008

Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL 7/1/2008 Appendix I OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR This Page Left Intentionally Blank OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR APPENDIX I PAGE 1 Appendix II OFFICE OF THE MORGAN COUNTY SURVEYOR This Page Left

More information

Final Drainage Report

Final Drainage Report Thornton Electric Substation Project Final Drainage Report December 14, 2016 DRAFT Prepared for: Xcel Energy, 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado 80202 Prepared by: 350 Indiana Street, Suite

More information

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF 3.1.1 Introduction to Hydrologic Methods...3.1-1 3.1.2 Symbols and Definitions...3.1-3 3.1.3 Rainfall

More information

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description and Location Isabella Ocean Residences is a residential development to be constructed

More information