5 th Kitakyushu Initiative Network Meeting

Transcription

1 Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) Kitakyushu Initiative for a Clean Environment 5th Kitakyushu Initiative Network Meeting Summary of Thematic Sessions (A E) Good Practices Models Day 2 Rihga Royal Hotel, Kitakyushu, Japan Toshizo Maeda, IGES Kitakyushu Office Summary of Session A (Sanitation & Low Cost Wastewater Management) 1. High potential for adoption and replication in the region: A number of promising models and good practices available Highlighted: SANIMAS community based sanitation systems (Indonesia), Septage management(nonthaburi), BOT model (Weihai, China), river management in Korea, water supply in Cambodia Decentralized systems: affordable, effective and low operation costs Seed money and operation costs still required (user fees collection) Cooperation and participation among local/provincial and central s, develop capacity for replication Effective governance,, political commitment and leadership, precautionary approach, public awareness Infrastructure development, finance, economic benefits Technical assistance 2 Summary of Session B (Municipal Solid Waste Management) 1. Proven effective models that can be replicated Larger benefits expected with more support Highlighted: Surabaya model replicated in Bago, Cebu, Bangkok, Sibu; and Sto. Tomas model Build upon existing momentum, catalyze further replication in other cities and countries ti External agencies: Work with cities with high potential s: Enlist support of all stakeholders s, community s, private sector, media Central s: Institutionalize improvement of waste management through nation wide policy, replicate local models Summary of Session C (Improvement of WM and Final Disposal Sites) 1. Huge demand for improvement of final disposal sites Some less expensive systems/models available for systematic application and replication: Highlighted: Fukuoka method adapted in Dhaka, Kathmandu, San Fernando sanitary landfill Mostexisting sites can be retrofitted to a certain extent Financial sustainability: waste disposal systems are expensive; charges to users are necessary to lengthen landfill lifespan Long term solution: Active waste diversion more important composting, 3Rs with innovative participatory approach and regulation (case of Ooki town and Ube city) 3 4 Summary of Session D (Energy and Air Quality) Presented cases: Case studies of energy efficiency in buildings (Tajikistan, Malaysia, Thailand, China and India); air pollution (Philippines) 1. infrastructure design has considerable long term implications energy use and air pollution issues. 2. Due to considerable losses across the energy supply chain, implementing end use energy efficiency can result in massive savings in primary energy not needed at the power station. 3. Key Points Political will and strong partnerships are important in tackling these challenges. There are many options to overcome these barriers, if municipalities are serious about taking responsibility to implement initiatives. 5 Summary of Session E (Long term Vision on Development & Env.) 1. Long term planning and strong vision are important for realizing environmentally sustainable cities Based on clear vision, clear and measurable goals are set and supported by policy Higlighted: Puerto Princesa, Ulsan, Yokohama, Kyoto, Kitakyushu, Minamata etc Implementation guided by goals with collective efforts of all levels of society, respecting local features and traditional culture s with Strong political will, long term vision and aggressive public education Public participation in decision making process Cooperation with private sector Multi sectoral approach 6 1

2 Models of Good Practices 1. is complex and does not happen automatically Implementation of pilot projects and sharing knowledge on best practices were insufficient (1 st cycle) Many projects remain singular events without further replication. Why? Models of Good Practices 1. Surabaya s WM model was successfully replicated in 2 nd Cycle 1. Household based composting practice was developed and disseminated from to other s 2. scaled up composting with collaboration of others: PKK, s, private sector, media; 3. New composting s were set up in the city 4. Surabaya s model was replicated in Philippines, Thailand and so forth with facilitation by KI programme and others 5. Cities independently assisted others cities to replicate (self replicating) 2. Several replication models derived from Surabaya s case and other successful programmes studied by KI secretariat 3. Key factor the inter mediator as main driving force 7 8 Spread of Surabaya s model to 4 other Countries Starting a model in Surabaya, Indonesia (photo courtesy of KITA) INDONESIA Surabaya Semarang Medan Makassar Palembang Central Jakarta Balikpapan Tarakan PHILIPPINES Bago Talisay Cebu Cavite Bangkok THAILAND Sankamphaeng Puerto Princesa Sri Lacha NEPAL Lalitpur MALAYSIA Sibu Kuala Lumpur 9 Waste composition survey Shredding of waste Mixing with seed compost Temperature measurement Fermentation and ph tests Explaining how to use baskets to residents 10 s activities (4) Achievements following KITA s facilitation (photo courtesy of KITA) Segregated g waste collection from the community Shredding at the composting Fermentation PUSDAKOTA s compost : before and after KITA s intervention Household compost basket Selling compost Green streets using compost

3 (4) Activities of PKK (a women s )and Environmental Cadres and its positive impacts in Surabaya (Photos cited from Sparking Parks in Surabaya, Cleansing Department, Surabaya, 2008) Program pokok ke-9 Organic-unorganic waste sorting KELESTARIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP VICE CHAIRMAN OF PKK DIRECTLY GIVING TRAINING 9th main program ENVIRONMENT PRESERVATION Recycling trainings Waste segregation training Explaining how to use 9th main program ENVIRONMENT PRESERVATION Turn waste into blessing Manufacturing bags from waste Parks became greener using compost Streets became greener using compost Meeting of Environmental Cadres Activities of Environmental Cadres Environmental Event (Photo courtesy of PKK Surabaya (top row) and Environmental Cadre of Tegalsari, Surabaya (bottom row) 13 Bratang Compost Centre Sonokwijenan Compost Centre Keputran Compost Centre 14 and Private Sector Involvement in five cities, Indonesia Green streets Campaign sponsors Award winning community Products made from waste Central Jakarta Makassar Palembang Entrance to a community Award winning housewives 15 Tarakan Balikpapan 16 Main stakeholders Government Surabaya 5. Green & Clean Supports Campaign for campaigns Competition among communities Figure 13 Roles and relationships of key stakeholders in Surabaya who promoted composting practices 3. Operation of composting s Purchase of Surabaya Cleansing Dept. Operating 12 composting s Distribution of PKK to city cooperation Purchase of External agency Kitakyushu KITA Catalytic role 1. Technical Development cooperation of Dev. composting of methods 1) by s Inter mediator Pagtambayayong Foundation Private sector Unilever (Uli Peduli) & Java Post Green & Clean Campaign based SWM /CBO Other s Cadres Environmental Cadre system (28,000 Cadres) 4. Distribution of Environmental education (Socialisation) 2. Running Operation a community of a composting Provide composting trainings (over 80 times) Provision of Provision of composting trainings 17 boundary 1. Training provided to others became source of s revenue 2. Common feature: Strong mandate and high motivation to spread good practices beyond their operating borders 3. Win-win situation for s and KI programme 18 3

4 2) Scaling up by local s 1 2) Scaling up by local s 2 s composting Pagtambayayong Foundation Inter mediator Surabaya Government boundary Financial and political supports Use of compost baskets Pagtambayayong at Foundation households h A community in which where Pustakota is located Surabaya Government PKK (women s ) and other s Private companies and the media Support for the community cleanup campaign environmental leaders boundary 1. engaged others to distribute thousands of compost baskets for household use 2. New composting s were set up 1. cleaning campaigns were organized with the support of private sector and media 2. Similarly observed in Bago city in Philippines and Bangkok, Thailand ) to city & through inter city network 1 3) to city (Case of Sto. Tomas Municipality) Indonesia Financial supports JICA s Grassroots Grant CLAIR Japan Fund for Global Environmental UNESCAP Thailand Sankamphhaeng Bangkok Sri Lacha Political support NSWMC Technical assistance Surabaya s solid waste management model practices JICA Indonesia Office Kitakyushu Pagtambayayong KITAFoundation Kitakyushu Initiative Programme Semarang Medan Makassar Palembang Central Jakarta Balikpapan Tarakan APFED JICA Malaysia Office Bago Philippines Sibu Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Cebu Talisay Cavite Puerto Princesa JICA Nepal Office Lalitpur Nepal Sto. Tomas Municipality boundary Service fee 1. Sto. Tomas successful waste reduction strategy was highlighted by a national agency and replicated in more than 20 cities in the Mindanao region 2. The municipality charges for technical training and supervision 3. to city replication without relying on external financial support (ideal) ) by External Organisations 1 4) by External Organisations 2 Provincial boundary Technical and financial assistance Donor Technical and financial assistance Donor Provincial of good practices by a provincial assisted by a donor

5 4) by External Organisations 3 5) by Central Governments Technical and financial assistance LINAW / PSA Programme Financial support by donors Muntinlupa Capacity building Dumaguete San Fernando Manjuyod Technical and financial assistance Ministry of Public Works (PU) BORDA Financial support donors Capacity building Capacity building LINAW programme ( ) 4 cities PSA programme ( ) 10 cities and 2 Water Districts of low cost wastewater treatment systems by LINAW/PSA (Philippines) pilot projects by BORDA ( ) More than 300 replicated projects under the SANIMAS programme by the Ministry of Public Works (PU) ( ) Scaling up of pilot projects by the central (SANIMAS programme under the Ministry of Public Works (PU), Indonesia) 26 Conclusions 1. KI programme demonstrated actual replication Intentional selection of models/practices that are suitable for replication Features of replicability: Low cost, low tech, low maintenance, labour intensive, utilization of local resources Application in Bago, Philippines Using mud press from sugarcane 2. models can be used to spread good practices in urban environmental management Many potential practices identified under KI programme Helpful for designing framework and guiding approaches for other inter city network programmes etc Vermi composting 3 months for processing Changing to Takakura Method (2 weeks for fermenting) Household compost boxes and pots Copied from Bago to Cebu, Philippines Copied from Bago to Talisay, Philippines 2,000 baskets were distributed by Pagtambayayong () Dump site is full Workshop in December, 2008 in Talisay A small vegetable garden next to a make-shift hose using compost made from kitchen waste Seed compost is used under a shade Day 1 Day

6 Copied from Bago to Ternate, Cavite, Philippines Application in Bangkok, Thailand A composting build by an in Ternate, Cavite Din Daeng composting Participants i in a work shop in Ternate, Cavite 31 Checking the condition of a household 32 Copied from Bangkok to Lalitpur, Nepal Copied from Bangkok to Sibu and KL, Malaysia Participants from 26 local authorities Women s preparing seed compost 200 out of 600 household was trained after a workshop in Bangkok Workshop Training in Sibu& KL December 2009 Basket developed in Lalitpur 33 RM70,000 (made in Australia) 34 Application of in Sibu, Malaysia In Schools Source: Sibu Municipal Council THE END. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! 35 6