Position Statement on. Biofuel. crops.org USDA-ARS
|
|
- Brandon Simon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Position Statement on Biofuel crops.org USDA-ARS
2 Introduction Over the past decade, unstable petroleum prices and Federal policies aimed at reducing U.S. dependency on oil imports have led to rapid growth in biofuel demand. In turn, these policies have led to an increase in the production of agricultural commodities that serve as feedstock for biofuels. The production of bioenergy from biomass feedstocks is unique as it is the only renewable energy source that can be converted to a liquid transportation fuel. The Crop Science Society of America (CSSA) recognizes the significant role of biofuels as a renewable energy source and as a facilitator of rural economic growth. Our scientists and students play a vital role in this process by contributing new technologies and management strategies that assist energy producers in achieving or surpassing current renewable fuel standards. In addition, crop science and its component disciplines integrate basic and applied research in order to achieve a holistic, systems-based approach to producing sustainable biofuel feedstock. The integration of public and private sector contributions into the development and transfer of related technologies allows our crop scientists to continually optimize the production of feedstocks. In addition, the future sustainment of feedstock production for the enhancement of rural economies can only be accomplished by capitalizing on multi-sector relationships, training, and continued advances in crop science. Background The 2005 Energy Policy Act (EPAct) established The Renewable Fuel Standard (known as RFS1), which authorized the production of renewable biofuels in order to reduce U.S. reliance on foreign oil. RFS1 required 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuel to be blended into gasoline by This goal was met with great success and in 2010 the U.S. produced more than 13 billion gallons of ethanol for blending. (see figure below) The 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) took RFS1 a step further and increased the goal for blending renewable fuels into transportation fuel to 36 billion gallons by 2022 (known as RFS2). RFS2 also established new categories of renewable fuel (i.e. advanced biofuel, biomass-based diesel, and cellulosic biofuel) and required life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) performance threshold standards that demonstrate lower GHG emissions than petroleum. Because of these changes, conventional biofuels (specifically corn ethanol) and advanced biofuels are now categorized separately. By January 2012, the United States had 209 ethanol plants on line with a total operating capacity of 14.0 billion gallons per year. 1 However, reaching 36 billion gallons by 2022 will require the identification of more efficient technologies, the cultivation of new feedstocks, and the implementation of efficient and sustainable cropping systems. CSSA s objectives for this position statement include: identifying challenges and opportunities within the biofuels sector, providing practical knowledge from the field that can enhance and inform biofuel production, and inviting a discussion to develop solutions for meeting the challenges of increasing renewable fuel supplies. CSSA looks forward to feedback from government, industry, science, and concerned citizen stakeholders regarding these issues. istock
3 Challenges 1. Meeting the Goals of RFS2 For each compliance year under the EISA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to determine the applicable renewable fuel percentage standards. The final percentage standards for 2011 and 2012 require blending the following: Meeting these targets for bioenergy production will require major advancements in the feedstock supplies, conversion technologies, and a rapid evolution of the cellulosic biofuel feedstock supply chain. 4 Conventional bioenergy feedstocks contain starch and sugars that easily ferment to produce ethanol and are used in combustion. Corn grain starch, in particular, is converted into glucose via enzymatic hydrolysis and subsequent glucose fermentation to make ethanol. Currently, corn ethanol comprises about 10% of the volume and 7% of the energy content of domestic gasoline consumed. 5 Yet, like all other biofuels, corn ethanol is simply one component of a diverse energy portfolio. At current corn grain production levels, the United States cannot substitute more than 15% of the country s transportation fuels with ethanol. 6 Although the United States has developed ethanol production from corn, and in some cases energy cane, additional feedstock sources are needed from an increasingly varied set of crops and land in order to produce the volume of biomass necessary to meet the EISA s goals by Cellulosic Standards First generation renewable biofuel Advanced biofuels Biomass-based diesel Cellulosic ethanol Million Gallons While the U.S. is on track to meet the 2022 mandates for conventional biofuels and biodiesel, there is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the development of cellulosic biofuels. In 2010 and 2011, the total volume of cellulosic biofuels qualifying under the RFS2 standard for 2010 and 2011 was zero gallons. 7 In 2012, the EPA raised the mandate for cellulosic biofuels by 2.65 million gallons over the 2011 level to a standard of million gallons. 8 However, this target falls far short of the 500 million gallons originally planned for Further, where the projected volume is less than the mandate required by EISA, the EPA is required to make waiver credits available for sale to obligated parties (generally, an obligated party is any refiner or importer of gasoline or diesel fuel in the U.S.). In 2010, obligated parties purchased 12,186 RFS2 cellulosic biofuel waiver credits. 9 According to a 2011 report by The National Academies, [without] major technological innovation or policy changes, the RFS2-mandated consumption of 16 billion gallons of ethanolequivalent cellulosic biofuels is unlikely to be met in In addition, at the time of publication, no commercially viable biorefineries exist[ed] for converting lignocellulosic biomass to fuels. 11 The report goes on to conclude that the capacity for producing cellulosic biofuels to meet the RFS2 consumption mandate will not be available unless innovative technologies are developed that unexpectedly improve the cellulosic biofuel production process, and technologies are scaled up and undergo several commercial-scale demonstrations in the next few years to optimize capital and operating costs. 12 The CSSA agrees with The National Academies findings and further concludes that without increased funding and support for research in crop science, we will fail to stimulate the advancements in bioenergy production that are necessary to develop and optimize feedstocks and sustainable cropping systems in order to meet the 2022 mandate. 3. Sustainable Biofuel Production and Lifecycle GHG Analyses The EISA set the first U.S. mandatory lifecycle GHG reduction thresholds for each of the four types of renewable fuel thereby requiring a percentage improvement compared to a baseline of gasoline and diesel. 13 According to the EISA, renewable fuels produced at new facilities require a 20% reduction in lifecycle GHG emissions, biomass-based diesel or advanced biofuel require a 50% reduction, and cellulosic biofuels require a 60% reduction. 14 In addition, the EISA provided EPA some flexibility in adjusting these percentage thresholds under certain circumstances. 15 Lifecycle GHG Thresholds Specified in EISA* (percent reduction from 2005 baseline) Renewable fuel, 20% Advanced biofuel, 50% Biomass-based diesel, 50% Cellulosic biofuel, 60% * renewablefuels/420f10007.pdf
4 The EISA defines lifecycle GHG emissions as follows: The term lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions means the aggregate quantity of greenhouse gas emissions (including direct emissions and significant indirect emissions such as significant emissions from land use changes), as determined by the Administrator, related to the full fuel lifecycle, including all stages of fuel and feedstock production and distribution, from feedstock generation or extraction through the distribution and delivery and use of the finished fuel to the ultimate consumer, where the mass values for all greenhouse gases are adjusted to account for their relative global warming potential. 16 The National Risk Management Research Laboratory further describes life-cycle analysis as a technique used to assess the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated with a product, process, or service, by: compiling an inventory of relevant energy and material inputs and environmental releases; evaluating the potential environmental impacts associated with identified inputs and releases; and interpreting the results to help inform decisions. However, the models originally used were not designed for this purpose. 17 In July 2011, EPA attempted to address this issue and finalized a rule deferring application of the greenhouse gas regulations to biomass emissions for three years. 18 In its explanation for deference, the EPA cited the complexity and uncertainty of attempting to determine the net carbon cycle impact of particular facilities combusting particular types of biomass feedstocks. 19 Some studies have concluded that the total emissions from biomass-based energy generation depend primarily on the type of resource used, the production methods employed to grow and harvest the resource, and the time required to re-grow the biomass resource. 20 Because of this complexity, life-cycle analysis is a key factor of research design when developing and improving current feedstocks or designing cropping systems appropriate for biofuel feedstock production. As a result, although yield levels are critical, crop scientists also consider ways to improve input efficiency in feedstock production systems. Diverse teams of researchers have found that nutrient recovery and efficiency is possible in starch and cellulosicbased bioenergy production. A review of inputs over time in corn has documented modest to significant improvements in energy use and carbon emissions per bushel. 21 Additionally, switchgrass experiments show that approximately 78% of the nitrogen fertilizer input required can be recovered with the cellulosic ethanol cropping system. Crop development provides the resources and knowledge necessary for ensuring consistent and reliable advances in feedstock yield and quality. In the crop development process, specific cultivar lines are selected by examining traits for fertilizer and water use efficiency, yield, and biomass quality. An ideal feedstock will have a good ratio of chemical and biological components for the greatest yield, the finest fuel quality, the lowest transportation costs, and the lowest lifecycle GHG emissions. Crop breeders, physiologists, and biotechnology scientists balance traits valuable for feedstock quality such as disease and pest resistance in the field with logistical properties such as dry and wet weights. In addition, through the judicious use of both traditional crop breeding and biotechnological approaches, crop scientists can determine the most effective and proven means of increasing yields. These improvements are vital to the long-term sustainability and economic viability of bioenergy production systems. 4. Food and Fuel Security Increased demand for biofuels has raised concerns about rising food prices as well as food and fuel security. However, bioenergy crops can be integrated into food and feed cropping systems or established as designated systems that subsist exclusively as sustainable feedstock. Recent advances raise the possibility that biofuels can be made from non-edible plants engineered to grow on land that has been abandoned for agricultural use in order to avoid compromising food security. 22 Corn and sugarcane research have demonstrated that grain or cane can be harvested for food or feed while also producing residue that can be used as a digestible cellulosic feedstock. 23 In addition, germplasm for these crops has been assessed for key agronomic and biofuel feedstock traits across a large gene pool and improvements have been made. For example, genetic research in energy sorghum has elucidated a set of maturity genes that are easily manipulated and strongly influence biomass yield potential of the crop. 24,25 Research can enhance food and fuel security by optimizing crop production on arable land, using crop residues as feedstocks, or by developing designated feedstock production on marginally productive cropland. Agricultural researchers, crop science educators, and crop professionals play key roles in training farmers about crop rotations and nutrient management techniques that enable intense production while minimizing environmental consequences. 26 Herbaceous perennial energy crops generally demand less fossil fuels, herbicides, and fertilizer than traditional row crops because they do not need to be planted annually. 27 While more research is necessary, it is apparent that these perennial cropping systems can produce large quantities of biomass while also providing important water and wildlife related ecosystem services. Annual bioenergy crops are also important to the complete production system. These crops provide production in the establishment year, protect against crop failure, and avoid the stand establishment issues that can occur in perennial crops. Recent development and deployment of sweet sorghum and biomass sorghum hybrids have exhibited great potential as high yielding and complementary biomass feedstocks. 28 In general, annual bioenergy crops are used in crop rotation systems that allow for their integration into existing food/feed production systems.
5 Sustainable cropping systems are economically viable without compromising future agricultural land use. These systems maintain or enhance soil productivity, water quality, and agroecosystem functions. Research has shown that bioenergy cropping systems achieve sustainability by providing an additional source of income to farm operations while also mitigating GHG emissions, building soil health, and increasing biomass yields. 29 Today s systems are being redesigned to improve nutrient, water, and energy-use efficiencies. Because of the innovative work of crop scientists and their colleagues in other disciplines, bioconversion processes are being configured to recover key plant nutrients from biomass and soil that allow for increased nutrient recycling, closed nutrient cycles and reduced energy and economic costs of production Building Equity and Demand in the Marketplace with Economic and Social Sustainability Where there is a demand to fill, farmers will respond. There is currently a distinct need for a marketplace where consumer demand for biofuel feedstock is consistent and obvious to farmers. This means making the economic benefits of feedstock production clear and easy to understand. While the corn and sugar cane ethanol market is burgeoning, the cellulosic sector is significantly hampered by low product supply. Market barriers in this sector include cost and competitive uses, large capital investment requirements for conversion facilities, a lack of risk management tools for bioenergy crops (including emerging crops and uses), and an inadequate supply-chain infrastructure. These barriers could, if left unaddressed, limit the United States capability to meet the blending goals laid out in the EISA for Cropping system production efficiency is a key area of concern for the Crop Science Society of America. The CSSA Grand Challenges for research released in 2011 underscore the importance of increasing production efficiencies in bioenergy systems. The Grand Challenges state that biofuel feedstock production research should: develop sustainable biofuel feedstock cropping systems that require minimal land area, optimize production, and improve the environment. As a result, there is a need to: modify crop compositions according to processing requirements; increase yield in low-input production systems; understand plant response to changes in the environment, in tandem with changes to composition for accurate modification; understand the ecosystem services (carbon sequestration, water quality, wildlife habitat, etc.) from perennial bioenergy crop production on arable and marginal lands; and develop new production systems that thrive in lowinput situations. For more information, please view the grand challenge at: The costs of biomass residue production are not trivial and include the cost of harvest, labor, fertilizer, and pesticide inputs. In the case of dedicated feedstocks, the production costs also include site preparation, fertilization, and maintenance. These expenses are influenced by yield per acre, fuel price, fertilizer price, labor, equipment availability, and financing. Market conditions must offer a feedstock price that compensates for these costs and creates incentives for farmers to integrate bioenergy feedstocks into their production systems. To address this issue, the Department of Energy s Biomass Multi-Year Program Plan is targeting conversion processes that can produce additional biofuels cheap enough to compete with gasoline at the pump, while at the same time offering sufficient feedstock prices to support economically viable biomass production. 31 Michael Casler
6 Market level solutions to maximize the biofuel value chain at the local level while improving rural development will need to include: alignment of biomass production with the scale of cellulosic biorefineries; efficient use of existing locally-owned conventional equipment to store and handle densified biomass; reduced transportation costs; reduced biorefinery conversion costs; and development of biofuel production and marketing systems. Numerous opportunities for collaboration between public and private sectors exist that could accelerate the development of the bioeconomy without compromising the long-term sustainability of economic, environmental, or social factors of the sector. These challenges are surmountable at the local level, and the economic and environmental opportunities associated with bioenergy production, especially those in rural areas, appear to far outweigh the uncertainties. 6. A Trained Bioenergy Workforce New conversion technologies have been developed based on the assumption that the bioeconomy will create a domestic supply of renewable biofuel and increase rural economic development. 32,33 However, to launch many of these technologies into commercialized production, there must be an available agricultural labor force. The contribution of biofuels production to increasing jobs and income will be substantial according to several economic reports {Swenson, 2007, Estimating the future economic impact of corn ethanol production in the U.S.}. 34 An estimate of the effects of increasing corn ethanol production to 14.5 billion gallons per year includes: 9000 direct jobs with payroll of $0.5 billion; payments for inputs of $17 billion requiring 11,600 jobs and payroll of $0.63 billion; and household purchases by workers of $3.5 billion sustaining 26,700 jobs and payroll of $1 billion. Total economic contributions include 47,200 jobs with $2.2 billion in labor income. If RFS2 biofuel targets are met, production would more than double, and job and income increases would be on the same order of magnitude. Training and deploying a qualified workforce for the bioenergy industries is no small task. These industries require personnel with a diverse and transformative set of skills ranging from crop physiology and plant breeding to economics. Certified professionals and scientists that can offer consulting services, develop new feedstocks appropriate to conversion technologies, and continually refine the approaches for producing bioenergy crops and cropping systems are increasingly in demand. CSSA has identified two main areas that require ongoing support from public and private institutions in order to ensure the success and growth of this sector: 1) continued support for basic and applied research and extension programs, and 2) support for STEM education programs and workforce training programs that will support the development of a qualified workforce for the bioenergy industry. Research, education, and extension programs within the United States Department of Agriculture s Research, Education, and Economics Mission Area are currently in place that develops educational and training materials appropriate to the needs of the bioenergy sector. CSSA urges the federal government to acknowledge and build upon the essential research conducted in such programs to build better science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education approaches that support the training of the next generation of experts who will be essential for developing and shaping the bioenergy sector. In order to succeed, more university-industry partnerships at the bachelor, master, and PhD levels are needed. Scholarships, fellowships, or internships could be funded by public or joint public-private foundations. Increased emphasis on recruitment needs to occur by interacting with guidance counselors and high-school level educators so that students enter the pipeline early. Community colleges also play a significant role in training students for the industry as not all jobs require technical training at or above the bachelor level. Further development of the science-business interface is needed to educate faculty, students, and post-doctorates about commercialization strategies, including the marketing of innovative ideas for the purpose of acquiring capital, venture or otherwise. Federal support for better use of university-based, industry-supported innovation incubators would help to advance the development of the sciencebusiness interface. Conclusion Today s advances in crop science provide farmers, agricultural consultants, and feedstock processers with robust options for sustainable bioenergy feedstock systems. To continue to meet future demands, collaborative and innovative transdisciplinary teams of researchers and private sector experts need to be supported to improve current feedstocks, identify new feedstocks, and design approaches to maximize the efficiency of bioenergy cropping systems. Additionally, accurate scientific information on productivity and life-cycle analysis models is needed to guide policy and regulations governing bioenergy use. These efforts will enhance the use-efficiency of agronomic inputs and limit greenhouse emissions from these systems.
7 Examples of bioenergy crops and uses: Switchgrass is a perennial warm-season grass native to North America well adapted to marginally-productive cropland similar to land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). In 1984, the U.S. DOE funded a multi-year screening of herbaceous species at 31 sites in the primary agro-ecoregions of the U.S. to determine their suitability for biomass energy production. Switchgrass, second generation feedstock, does require management to optimize productivity and maintain quality stands. Best management practices for switchgrass have been developed for most agro-ecoregions of the U.S. east of the 100th Meridian. Switchgrass genetics have been enhanced through population improvement. Energy cane is developed from early generations of the sugar cane hybrid breeding program which have lower sugar yields, but higher biomass yields, making it an ideal cellulosic feedstock. These energy cane hybrids produce 10 to 20 tons of biomass per acre in the Gulf Coast region and have persisted in most of the southeast as well. 35 Production practices for sugar cane can be easily adapted for energy cane. Miscanthus species are being evaluated for biofuel and electricity cogeneration with coal. Although the cost to plant Miscanthus giganteus is nearly $1,200 per acre and initial yields are low, it has a high return on investment because it requires fewer agronomic inputs than other annual row crops commonly grown in the Midwest. Additionally, in the second year of production, Miscanthus giganteus can produce six to eight tons of biomass per acre, 36 and 10 tons of biomass per acre by year three. 37 Right now, Miscanthus strains are being developed that are available for planting via seed. 38 While Miscanthus produces more biomass per unit than other herbaceous perennials, the cost of establishment and maintenance requirements may limit producer acceptance on a large scale until non-invasive, seeded varieties can be developed. Limitations also exist for this otherwise promising species because of the lack of field data available to develop coherent business plans or and life-cycle analysis. feedstocks, the biomass sorghum types accumulate significant quantities of structural carbohydrates and are intended to be used to complement those perennial feedstock production systems. All of these sorghums are annuals, meaning that they are established each year for production in that year. Short-rotation woody crops are also an attractive bioenergy feedstock. With the potential for production on marginal lands, woody crops are characterized by rotations of 3 10 years and offer logistical advantages for year-round delivery of biomass. Willow (in the Northeast) and hybrid poplar (in the North-Central and Pacific Northwest) are currently the more developed species. While biomass yields of 4 7 tons per acre are typically reported, elite varieties are currently being evaluated through a partnership with DOE. Preliminary results suggest that elite varieties may have significant yield improvements in certain regions of the country. Rich genetic diversity in both species promise continued gains in growth rates, and the potential to tailor properties for optimal conversion performance in moving forward. Woody crops are projected to play a major role in the Southeast. Exciting progress has been made with eucalyptus. This highly productive species yields up to twelve tons of biomass per acre but is sensitive to cold weather. However, cold-tolerance is encouraging and could expand the range of eucalyptus to a significant area across the region. Southern pine occupies more than 30 million acres of plantation land across the south and holds considerable promise as a biofuel feedstock. Production technologies specific to bioenergy feedstock have received only limited attention, although integrated systems which produce herbaceous energy crops between forested pine are of great interest. Also, recent advances in control of cell wall chemistry to reduce recalcitrance and research toward increased production of isoprenoid compounds for fuel suggest that southern pine will make important contributions to the region s biofuels industry. Sorghum as a bioenergy crop has been developed for three distinct conversion processes. Approximately 30% of U.S. grain sorghum is used for ethanol production. Sweet sorghum accumulates significant quantities of soluble, fermentable sugar in the stalk of the plant. This crop can be processed in a similar manner to sugarcane. It is currently being evaluated to extend the mill season in the Brazilian sugarcane industry and in targeted regions of the U.S., the production of both sweet sorghum and sugarcane (energycane) is essential to have a harvest season long enough to justify capital investment in infrastructure and conversion facilities. Like most of the perennial biomass istock/jan-otto
8 Endnotes 1 Renewable Fuel Association, 2 Under the Clean Air Act Section 211(o), as amended by the EISA of 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was required to set the annual standards under the Renewable Fuel Standard program (RFS) each November for the following year based on gasoline and diesel projections from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). renewablefuels/420f10056.htm 3 pdf CFR, Vol. 77, No. 5, Monday, January 9, web.pdf 5 United States Department of Energy. Report on the First Quadrennial Technology Review, P. 58 (Sept., 2011). ( gov/downloads/report-first-quadrennial-technology-review or energy.gov/sites/prod/files/qtr_report.pdf) 6 (Houghton et al., 2006) pdf CFR, Vol. 77, No. 5, Monday, January 9, htm 10 Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of U.S. Biofuel Policy, Committee on Economic and Environmental Impacts of Increasing Biofuels Production; National Research Council (2011). Page Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of U.S. Biofuel Policy, Committee on Economic and Environmental Impacts of Increasing Biofuels Production; National Research Council (2011). Page Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of U.S. Biofuel Policy, Committee on Economic and Environmental Impacts of Increasing Biofuels Production; National Research Council (2011). Page Clean Air Act Section 211(o)(1) 17 For example, GTAP was built to analyze trade policy; FAPRI was used to model agriculture policy and farm bill implications; and, FASOM was built by the EPA to analyze the forestry sector. 18 Deferral for CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs, 76 Fed. Reg. 43,490 (July 20, 2011) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pts. 51, 52, 70, and 71). 19 Deferral for CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs, 76 Fed. Reg. 43,490 (July 20, 2011) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pts. 51, 52, 70, and 71) at 43, MANOMET CTR. FOR CONSERVATION SCIS., BIOMASS SUSTAINABILITY AND CARBON POL Y STUDY (2010), Environmental Resource Indicators for Measuring Outcomes of On-Farm Agricultural Production in the United States, First Report, January Keystone Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture Field-to-Market_Environmental-Indicator_First_Report_With_ Appendices_ pdf 22 post/2012/05/plant-based-biofuels-could-power-nearly-a-third-ofvehicles/1#.t6e_ysxllgm 23 Lorenz, A.J., J.G. Coors, C.N. Hansey, S.M. Kaeppler, and N. de Leon.* Genetic Analysis of Cell Wall Traits Relevant to Cellulosic Ethanol Production in Maize (Zea mays L.) 24 Rooney, W.L., J. Blumenthal, B. Bean, and J.E. Mullet Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 1: Murphy, R.L., R.R. Klein, D.T. Morishige, J.A. Brady, W.L. Rooney, F.R. Miller, D.T. Dugas, P.E. Klein, and J.E. Mullet Sorghum PRR37 (Ma1) Controls Flowering in Response to Photoperiod through Coincident Light/Clock Regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108: Burney, J.A., S.J. Davis, and D.B. Lobell Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: Schmer, M.R., K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, and R.K. Perrin Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105: Rooney, W.L., J. Blumenthal, B. Bean, and J.E. Mullet Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 1: Somerville, C., H. Youngs, C. Taylor, S.C. Davis, and S.P. Long. (2010. Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels. Science 329(5993): Anex, R.P., L.R. Lynd, M.S. Laser, A.H. Heggenstaller, and M. Liebman Potential for Enhanced Nutrient Cycling through Coupling of Agricultural and Bioenergy Systems. 31 DOE. april_2011.pdf 32 Berndes, G., M. Hoogwijk, and R. van den Broek The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies. Biomass Bioenerg. 25: Hoogwijk, M., et al Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenerg. 25: Swenson, D Estimating the future economic impact of corn ethanol production in the U.S. In: Web papers. Iowa State University. p Perlack, R.D., and B.J. Stokes U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. p Perlack, R.D., and B.J. Stokes U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. p Heaton, E., T. Voight, and S.P. Long A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perrennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature, and water. Biomass Bioenerg. 27: Mitchell, R.B., V. Owens, N. Gutterson, E.P. Richard, and J.N. Barney Herbaceous perennials: placement, benefits and incorporation challenges in diversified landscapes. In: R. Braun, D. Karlen, and D. Johnson, editors, Sustainable Alternative Fuel Feedstock Opportunities, Challenges and Roadmaps for Six U.S. Regions. Soil & Water Cons. Soc., Ankeny, IA. p Schmer, M.R., K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, and R.K. Perrin Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105: Mitchell, R., K.P. Vogel, and D. Uden The feasibility of switchgrass for biofuel production. Biofuels 3: Guilford Road, Madison, WI
Long-term Outlook for Biofuel Production and Technologies [What has to be done in practice] Richard Flavell Ceres, California, USA
Long-term Outlook for Biofuel Production and Technologies [What has to be done in practice] Richard Flavell Ceres, California, USA Long Term Outlook Promising: World wide concerns Government initiatives
More informationGrowing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects
Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1 Scott Malcolm smalcolm@ers.usda.gov 10 Marcel Aillery maillery@ers.usda.gov Federal mandates for biofuel production promote expanded crop
More informationOffice of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses. November 19, 2008
THE CURRENT STATUS AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR INDUSTRIAL BIOMASS IN THE UNITED STATES BY Dr. Marvin Duncan USDA/OCE/OEPNU November 19, 2008 This presentation has five sections Background Current biofuels
More informationLooking at the Economics of the Next Generation of Biofuels
Looking at the Economics of the Next Generation of Biofuels Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University E-mail: chart@iastate.edu May 27, 2008 Breeding Lignocellulosic
More informationGrand Challenges. C r o p S c i e n c e S o c i e t y o f A m e r i c a. Plant Sciences for a Better World
Grand Challenges C r o p S c i e n c e S o c i e t y o f A m e r i c a Plant Sciences for a Better World Written by the Crop Science Society of America (CSSA) Grand Challenge Committee Crop Science Society
More informationNew Studies Portray Unbalanced Perspective on Biofuels. DOE Committed to Environmentally Sound Biofuels Development
New Studies Portray Unbalanced Perspective on Biofuels DOE Committed to Environmentally Sound Biofuels Development DOE Response based on contributions from Office of Biomass Program; Argonne National Lab,
More informationBiofuels and Food Security A consultation by the HLPE to set the track of its study.
Biofuels and Food Security A consultation by the HLPE to set the track of its study. Discussion No. 80 from 8 to 28 May 2012 In October 2011, the CFS has recommended that appropriate parties and stakeholders
More informationProduction of Biofuels Feedstock on Agriculture Land and Grasslands
Production of Biofuels Feedstock on Agriculture Land and Grasslands W. W. Wilhelm 1, Gary Varvel 1, Rob Mitchell 2, and Brian Wienhold 1 1 Agroecosystem Management Research Unit 2 Grain, Forage, and Bioenergy
More informationProceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show
Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show December 4 6, 2007 Minneapolis Convention Center Do not Reproduce or Redistribute Without Written Consent of the Author(s) The Realities of
More informationSecond Generation Biofuels: Economic and Policy Issues
Second Generation Biofuels: Economic and Policy Issues Wally Tyner With Input from Farzad Taheripour March 27, 2012 Presentation Outline New data on global land use change Sources of uncertainty for second
More informationPotential for Sustainable Deployment of Biofuels Under EISA
Potential for Sustainable Deployment of Biofuels Under EISA American Chemical Society Science & the Congress Briefing on Cellulosic Biofuels Virginia H. Dale Oak Ridge National Laboratory Washington, D.C.
More informationBiofuels: Costs and Potential for Mitigating Greenhouse Gases
Biofuels: Costs and Potential for Mitigating Greenhouse Gases Madhu Khanna Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics Energy Biosciences Institute University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign GHG Emissions
More informationSustainable Production and Distribution of Bioenergy for the Central USA
Ken Moore, Stuart Birrell, Robert Brown, Mike Casler, Jill Euken, Mark Hanna, Dermot Hayes, Jason Hill, Keri Jacobs, Cathy Kling, David Laird, Robert Mitchell, Patrick Murphy, Raj Raman, Charles Schwab,
More informationEvolving Priorities for NIFA Funded Bioenergy Work
Evolving Priorities for NIFA Funded Bioenergy Work Franklin E. Boteler NIFA Institute of Bioenergy, Climate and Environment fboteler@nifa.usda.gov Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 Calls
More informationU.S. EPA Renewable Fuel Standard 2
Policy Update Number 6 April 2, 2010 U.S. EPA Renewable Fuel Standard 2 Final Rule Summary Fig. 1. Projected volumes of renewable fuels under RFS2. Source: EPA 2010a. ICCT Policy Updates summarize and
More informationGrowing the Nation s Bioeconomy Through Science
Growing the Nation s Bioeconomy Through Science Sustainable Development Feedstock Development Pre-Processing Conversion Education & Outreach Why Bioenergy? We need energy. We need energy to turn on the
More informationSpecial issue: Renewable Fuels and the Bioeconomy
Number 69 February 16, 2007 Special issue: Renewable Fuels and the Bioeconomy Renewable Fuels and More: Creating a Sustainable Bioeconomy for the Nation was the title of the January 31, 2007 Agronomy Seminar
More informationEnergy Issues Affecting Corn/Soybean Systems: Challenges for Sustainable Production
Energy Issues Affecting Corn/Soybean Systems: Challenges for Sustainable Production Issue Paper 48 January 2012 Dr. Doug Karlen www.cast-science.org 1 Authors Douglas Karlen (Chair) Task Force Members
More informationCrop Science Society of America
Crop Science Society of America Grand Challenge Statements Crop science is a highly integrative science employing the disciplines of conventional plant breeding, transgenic crop improvement, plant physiology,
More informationUS Energy A Place for Bioenergy
US Energy A Place for Bioenergy Harry S. Baumes, Ph. D. Director North Central Sustainable Agricultural Research & Education Michigan State University W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Hickory Corners,
More informationThe Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program Presentation for The Nexus of Biofuels Energy, Climate Change, and Health Workshop (Institute of Medicine) January 25, 2013 Karl Simon, Director Transportation
More informationUSDA S STRATEGY AND FUNDING, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR RURAL AMERICA
RENEWABLE ENERGY: USDA S STRATEGY AND FUNDING, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR RURAL AMERICA APCA (Chambers of Agriculture) Room Rene Blondelle 75008 Paris February 11, 2010 Marvin Duncan, Ph.D. Senior Agricultural
More informationGRASS BIOMASS. By Jock Gill Grass Energy Collaborative, Inc. September Overview
GRASS BIOMASS By Jock Gill Grass Energy Collaborative, Inc. September 2006 Overview One of the most exciting renewable energy potentials emerging for farm development is grass and other herbaceous bioenergy
More informationBiofuels: Trends, Specifications, Biomass Conversion, and GHG Assessments
Biofuels: Trends, Specifications, Biomass Conversion, and GHG Assessments 6 th International Symposium on Fuels and Lubricants New Delhi, India March 9-12, 2008 S. Kent Hoekman, Ph.D. Desert Research Institute
More informationThe role of 2 nd generation biofuels in tackling climate change with a positive social and economic dimension
The role of 2 nd generation biofuels in tackling climate change with a positive social and economic dimension Dr. Mairi J. Black Conference on Advanced Biofuels and Bioeconomy 2 nd December 2016, Canning
More informationPlant biotechnology and the future of ethanol
Plant biotechnology and the future of ethanol CPAC July, 2009 Greg Crabb Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Syngenta s role in agriculture Syngenta is one of the world s
More informationThis talk should cover:
This talk should cover: Context for biomass cropping Crop choice in Iowa Basic Miscanthus management What we are doing in the Biomass Crop Production Group at ISU Context Crop Choice Miscanthus Research
More informationAPI Southern Region/ State Working Groups Spring Conference Charleston, SC
THE FUTURE OF ETHANOL Presentation to API Southern Region/ State Working Groups Spring Conference Charleston, SC By Mike D. McDaniel, Ph.D. LSU Center for Energy Studies May 20, 2008 THE FUTURE OF ETHANOL
More informationCritical Issues of Biofuel Life-Cycle Analysis
Critical Issues of Biofuel Life-Cycle Analysis Michael Wang Center for Transportation Research Argonne National Laboratory CRC Workshop on Life Cycle Analysis of Biofuels Argonne National Laboratory Oct.
More informationMetrics Models and Tools for Evaluating the Impacts of Biofuels
Metrics Models and Tools for Evaluating the Impacts of Biofuels National Academy of Sciences Workshop Madison, Wisconsin June 23, 2009 Alan D. Hecht Director for Sustainable Development Office of Research
More informationFlorida Water Availability and Water Needs In 2020, Chuck Aller Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services February 28, 2008
Florida Water Availability and Water Needs In 2020, 2060 Chuck Aller Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services February 28, 2008 Florida Agriculture Today 41,000 farms and ranches 14.3 million
More informationPBCC Environment White Paper Draft 2.0
Plant breeding for harmony between agriculture and the environment White Paper E. Charles Brummer, Rich Pratt, Steve Jones, Julia Kornegay, Wesley Barber, Isabelle Delanney, Sarah Collier, Randy Johnson,
More informationRange Fuels Plans for the Commercialization of Cellulosic Ethanol
Range Fuels Plans for the Commercialization of Cellulosic Ethanol Bio-Energy Wood Supply Chain Conference: New Opportunities, New Issues Bill Schafer, Sr. Vice President, Business Development Range Fuels,
More informationEnergy Crop Production. Emily Heaton Sam Jackson September 27, 2012
Energy Crop Production Emily Heaton Sam Jackson September 27, 2012 Genera Energy Inc. 167 Tellico Port Road Vonore, TN 37885 423.884.4110 - Phone 423.884.4129 - Fax www.generaenergy.com Sam Jackson VP,
More informationThe Economic and Policy Challenges of Biofuels
The Economic and Policy Challenges of Biofuels Madhu Khanna Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Economic, Environmental and Policy Challenges Growing
More informationSustainable Agriculture: What s Energy Got to Do With It? Bioenergy at a Crossroad Down on the Farm
Sustainable Agriculture: What s Energy Got to Do With It? Bioenergy at a Crossroad Down on the Farm American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy Des Moines, IA February 21, 2008 IATP works at the intersection
More informationBioenergy yield from cultivated land in Denmark competition between food, bioenergy and fossil fuels under physical and environmental constraints
Bioenergy yield from cultivated land in Denmark competition between food, bioenergy and fossil fuels under physical and environmental constraints I. Callesen 1,3, P.E. Grohnheit 2 and H. Østergård 1 1
More informationEnvironmental Life Cycle Assessments of Biofuels
Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Biofuels David R. Shonnard, Ph.D. Robbins Chair Professor Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological University Director, drshonna@mtu.edu Michigan
More informationMarch 22, Pollution Probe Pathways Initiative Workshop. Renewably Sourced Fuels. Carolyn Tester
March 22, 2015 Pollution Probe Pathways Initiative Workshop Renewably Sourced Fuels Carolyn Tester Principle-based Advocacy Free market, level playing field, market solutions No mandates or subsidies Consumer
More informationBuilding Successful Feedstock Logistical Systems
Building Successful Feedstock Logistical Systems February 4, 2015 Southeastern Sun Grant Regional Conference Auburn, Alabama Lance Stewart Supply Chain Manager Genera Energy Privately held biomass supply
More informationOffice of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses
Philadelphia Inquirer, Jan. 6, 2007 OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURE FOR BIOFUELS IN THE U. S. By Hosein Shapouri, Ph. D. CRC WORKSHOP ON LIFE CYCLE ANAYSIS OF BIOFUELS Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL,
More informationOverview of the Bioenergy Policy Landscape: Current Status, Future
Overview of the Bioenergy Policy Landscape: Current Status, Future Trends Ned Stowe Environmental and Energy Study Institute www.eesi.org Biomass/Waste to Energy to EnergyConversion Workshop January 19,
More informationBiofuels and the Environment: First Triennial Report to Congress
DRAFT EPA/600/R-10/183A DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE January 2011 External Review Draft Biofuels and the Environment: First Triennial Report to Congress NOTICE THIS DOCUMENT IS A PRELIMINARY DRAFT. It has not
More informationThe global biot ech et hanol company
The global biotech ethanol company ABENGOA BIOENERGY The global biot ech et hanol company Nebraska advanced biofuel opportunities utilizing grain sorghum as a feedstock Douglas Bice Corporate Project Development
More informationLiquid Biofuels for Transport
page 1/11 Scientific Facts on Liquid Biofuels for Transport Prospects, risks and opportunities Source document: FAO (2008) Summary & Details: GreenFacts Context - Serious questions are being raised about
More informationAgricultural Outlook Forum Presented: March 1-2, 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Outlook Forum Presented: March 1-2, 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture DEVELOPMENT OF CELLULOSIC BIOFUELS Chris Somerville Carnegie Institution, Stanford University Lawrence Berkeley National
More informationBiofuels Toward the Next Generation. BCSEA Energy Solutions, June 10, 2008 Patrick Mazza, Research Director, Climate Solutions
Biofuels Toward the Next Generation BCSEA Energy Solutions, June 10, 2008 Patrick Mazza, Research Director, Climate Solutions Climate Solutions Climate Solutions mission is to accelerate practical and
More informationWater Implications of Biofuel Policy in the U.S.
Water Implications of Biofuel Policy in the U.S. Jerry Schnoor Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering Center Global & Regional Environ Research Institute of Medicine (IOM)Roundtable Biofuels and Health
More information2002 Farm Bill v Farm Bill Energy Provisions
2002 Farm Bill v- Energy Provisions Biobased Markets Program Established new program for preferred purchase of biobased products by Federal agencies, modeled on existing program for purchase of recycled
More informationEthanol: Energy Well Spent
February 2006 Ethanol: Energy Well Spent A Survey of Studies Published Since 1990 Natural Resources Defense Council and Climate Solutions ABOUT NRDC The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national
More informationEPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR September 13, 2010
Comments of Biotechnology Industry Organization on EPA s Call for Information on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0560 September
More informationFEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTING BIOENERGY
FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS AFFECTING BIOENERGY Presentation to LSU AgCenter/International Programs USTDA & AEAI Pakistan Sugar Industry Biomass Cogeneration Orientation Louisiana State University
More informationGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center at Michigan State University
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center at Michigan State University Great Lakes Bioenergy Center Led by the University of Wisconsin-Madison with Michigan State University as the major partner. The mission
More informationBiofuels Journal Webinar Series September 15, 2009 Federal Stimulus Funding, Incentives and Policies for the Biofuels Industry
Biofuels Journal Webinar Series September 15, 2009 Federal Stimulus Funding, Incentives and Policies for the Biofuels Industry Gregory J. Lynch Office: 608-283-2240 Cell: 608-770-9549 gjlynch@michaelbest.com
More informationDOE Activities on Biofuels Sustainability Issues. Zia Haq
DOE Activities on Biofuels Sustainability Issues Zia Haq Coordinating Research Council, October 22, 2009 Introduction: Department of Energy Biomass Program The Biomass Program (OBP) at the DOE works closely
More informationSustainably Growing Above-Ground Energy Reserves
Sustainably Growing Above-Ground Energy Reserves Sustainable Feedstocks Environmental Non-food feedstocks Grown on non-food non-fiber land International sustainability certification Low direct and indirect
More informationBiofuels Provisions in the 2007 Energy Bill and the 2008 Farm Bill: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Order Code RL34239 Biofuels Provisions in the 2007 Energy Bill and the : A Side-by-Side Comparison Updated June 27, 2008 Tom Capehart and Randy Schnepf Specialists in Agricultural Policy Resources, Science,
More informationEvaluation of Breakeven Farm-gate Switchgrass Prices in South Central North Dakota
Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 632-S August 2008 Evaluation of Breakeven Farm-gate Prices in South Central North Dakota Dean A. Bangsund, Eric A. DeVuyst, and F. Larry Leistritz A key provision
More informationSorghum s Increasing Value for Renewable Markets Commercially scalable and ready today
Sorghum s Increasing Value for Renewable Markets Commercially scalable and ready today Kenneth G. Davenport, Ph.D. June 17, 2013 Outline 2 Chromatin, Inc. overview Choosing a feedstock: sorghum s unique
More informationBiofuels Incentives: A Summary of Federal Programs
Order Code RL33572 Biofuels Incentives: A Summary of Federal Programs Updated July 29, 2008 Brent D. Yacobucci Specialist in Energy and Environmental Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Biofuels
More informationSustainability and Bioenergy from Forests
Sustainability and Bioenergy from Forests Marcia Patton-Mallory, PhD Biomass and Bioenergy Coordinator, US Forest Service Harvesting Green Energy Conference Portland, OR January 29, 2008 Overview Sustainability:
More informationFeedstock Logistics. Michael Bomford Ken Bates
Feedstock Logistics Michael Bomford Ken Bates Sustainable feedstock logistics Energy Supply system must consume (much) less energy than biomass contains Ideal: Supply system runs on renewables Greenhouse
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. ELPC Clean Energy, Rural and Agriculture Colleagues. Howard Learner, Andy Olsen, Al Grosboll and Steve Falck, ELPC
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: RE: ELPC Clean Energy, Rural and Agriculture Colleagues Howard Learner, Andy Olsen, Al Grosboll and Steve Falck, ELPC Summary of 2014 Farm Bill s Energy Title Provisions DATE:
More informationVariable demand as an avenue to sustainable first generation biofuels
Variable demand as an avenue to sustainable first generation biofuels Sustainable First and Second Generation Bioethanol for Europe: Opportunities for People, Planet and Profit functionality & sustainability.
More informationLife Cycle Analysis of Canola for Biodiesel Use: PNW perspective
Life Cycle Analysis of Canola for Biodiesel Use: PNW perspective W. L. Pan, WA Biofuels Cropping Systems Coordinator W.A. Hammac, PhD Candidate Bioenergy Research Symposium, Nov. 13, 2012 Topics What is
More informationSustainable Biofuel Production
Sustainable Biofuel Production A U.S. Department of Energy Perspective Alison Goss Eng Office of the Biomass Program May 28, 2008 A Sustainable Biofuels Industry Social Promotes social goals Rural livelihoods
More information25x 25 Sustainability Presentation: 5 th California Biomass Collaborative Forum Joint Forum on Biomass Sustainability and Lifecycle Analysis
25x 25 Sustainability Presentation: 5 th California Biomass Collaborative Forum Joint Forum on Biomass Sustainability and Lifecycle Analysis May 28, 2008 25x 25: a National Alliance Formed in Spring 2004
More informationSustainability of Food, Energy and Environment with Biofuels
Sustainability of Food, Energy and Environment with Biofuels Madhu Khanna Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois For A New Green Revolution? Meeting Global Food and Energy
More informationSeoul, Korea May, 2017
Life-Cycle Analysis of Bioethanol Fuel Steffen Mueller, PhD, University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center Seoul, Korea May, 2017 Introduction University of Illinois at Chicago has 29,000 students
More informationBiofuels in the Gas Tank: What Does It Take? Maria Janowiak Future Fuels Field Trips March 2009
Biofuels in the Gas Tank: What Does It Take? Maria Janowiak Future Fuels Field Trips March 2009 Three types of energy: Heat Electricity Fuel Current US Energy Use 94% of our energy comes from fossil fuels.
More informationBiomass Electricity. Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski mziolkowski@kentlaw.edu November 29, 2009 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Conversion Process 3. Environmental Impact 4. Benefits for the US 5. The Future of Biomass Electricity
More informationRenewable Energy Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill
FSPPC111 Renewable Energy Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill Introduction The 2008 Farm Bill extends and expands many of the renewable energy programs originally authorized in the 2002 Farm Bill. The bill
More informationEnergy & Food Security:
IAEA 12 th Scientific Forum Energy for Development Vienna International Centre, Vienna September 15-16, 16, 29 Energy & Food Security: Faris Hasan Director of Corporate Planning OPEC Fund for International
More informationWhat does the introduction of energy crops mean for the crop mix and cellulosic ethanol plant location in Louisiana?
What does the introduction of energy crops mean for the crop mix and cellulosic ethanol plant location in Louisiana? Tyler Mark, Ph.D. Candidate Louisiana State University Graduate Student 215 Agricultural
More informationBiofuels: An Important Part of a Low-Carb Diet
Biofuels: An Important Part of a Low-Carb Diet Steven Bantz Union of Concerned Scientists Washington, DC The Union of Concerned Scientists is a science-based organization in DC, Berkeley, CA, and Cambridge,
More informationOVERVIEW Billion Ton Report recap Goals of the 2010 Update Key assumptions of methods of analysis. Results
Bob Perlack 1 *, Bryce Stokes 2 *, Laurence Eaton 1 **, John Ferrell 3, Mark Downing 1 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 Navarro Research & Engineering, Inc. 3 Department of Energy *Lead authors **Corresponding
More informationAvailability of Biomass Feedstocks in the Appalachian Region
Availability of Biomass Feedstocks in the Appalachian Region Appalachian Woody Biomass to Ethanol Conference Bob Perlack Oak Ridge National Laboratory September 5, 2007 Managed by UT-Battelle Quick review
More informationResponse to Department for Transport Call for Evidence on Advanced Fuels. Summary
Response to Department for Transport Call for Evidence on Advanced Fuels Summary 1. The Energy Technologies Institute (ETI), a public-private partnership between global energy and engineering firms and
More informationEconomics of a New Generation of Bioenergy Crops: Implications for Land Use and Greenhouse Gases
Economics of a New Generation of Bioenergy Crops: Implications for Land Use and Greenhouse Gases Madhu Khanna Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
More informationNIFA Sustainable Bioenergy Portfolio
NIFA Sustainable Bioenergy Portfolio Mark Poth, Ph.D. Sustainable Bioenergy Division Director Institute of Bioenergy, Climate and Environment National Institute of Food and Agriculture - USDA National
More informationReport of the Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on Biofuels: Trade and Development Implications of Present and Emerging Technologies
21 August 2007 English only UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Report of the Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on Biofuels: Trade and Development Implications of Present and Emerging Technologies
More informationFueling the Commercializationof Cellulosic Ethanol
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Conference on Cellulosic Biofuels September 2008 Fueling the Commercializationof Cellulosic Ethanol John Howe Verenium Corp., John.Howe@verenium.com
More informationU.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program
U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program Growing A Robust Biofuels Economy John Ferrell Feedstock Platform Manager Regional Feedstock Partnership Planning Meeting February 27, 2008 U.S. Commitment to
More informationEconomy-wide Implications from U.S. Bioenergy Expansion
Economy-wide Implications from U.S. Bioenergy Expansion Mark Gehlhar*, Agapi Somwaru*, Peter Dixon**, Maureen Rimmer** and Ashley Winston** Abstract The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)
More informationSugar Industry Restructuring by Implementing Biorefinery Technology
Sugar Industry Restructuring by Implementing Biorefinery Technology Dr. Maurizio Cocchi THE BIOREFINERY CONCEPT Biorefinery approach Integration of biomass conversion processes and technologies to produce
More informationAn Update on Range Fuels Soperton Plant Project
An Update on Range Fuels Soperton Plant Project Range Fuels Focus Commercial production of cellulosic biofuels, including cellulosic ethanol, and clean renewable power from renewable biomass that cannot
More informationBioEnergy Policy Brief January 2013
Aggregate Economic Implications of National Cellulosic Biofuel Goals 1 Naveen C. Adusumilli, C. Robert Taylor, Ronald D. Lacewell, and M. Edward Rister Estimates of the domestic and international economic
More informationRenewable Energy Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill
Renewable Energy Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill Megan Stubbs Analyst in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy August 13, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationTom Richard, Penn State University NARA Annual Meeting May 3, 2016
NEWBio: The Northeast Woody/Warm-season Biomass Consortium Tom Richard, Penn State University NARA Annual Meeting May 3, 2016 Northeast Woody/Warm-Season Biomass Consortium 2015 Annual Meeting NEWBio s
More informationPlease find attached the Grain Farmers of Ontario s comments on the Ontario Climate Change Discussion paper.
March 27, 2015 Honourable Glen Murray Minister of Environment and Climate Change Ferguson Block 11th Floor 77 Wellesley St West Toronto ON M7A 2T5 Dear Minister Murray, Please find attached the Grain Farmers
More informationStrategies for building the nextgeneration
Strategies for building the nextgeneration biofuel supply chain Tom Maze Transportation Seminar Mark Mba Wright Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering Iowa State University 3/27/15 The US Biofuel Context
More informationSupplying New Markets with Forest Products Nationwide. Bryce Stokes USDA Forest Service Research & Development Washington, DC
Supplying New Markets with Forest Products Nationwide Bryce Stokes USDA Forest Service Research & Development Washington, DC The Carbohydrate Economy... (Cellulosic Biorefinery...) Bioeconomy Dr. Peter
More informationMultifunctional production of biomass for the bio-based economy. Erik Steen Jensen Biosystems and Technology LTJ Faculty
Multifunctional production of biomass for the bio-based economy Erik Steen Jensen Biosystems and Technology LTJ Faculty Challenges for the global society Global population growth and food security Climate
More informationLocal Bioenergy: Benefits and Challenges
Agricultural Watershed Institute Local Bioenergy: Benefits and Challenges Steve John Agricultural Watershed Institute sfjohn@agwatershed.org EESI Biomass Crops Briefing March 26, 2012 Agricultural Watershed
More informationAGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 26: U.S. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 26: U.S. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AGEC 429 Lecture #26 U.S. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Basic Premise of Resource and Environmental
More informationClick to edit Master title style
Growing Energy: Brazil and Beyond Click to edit Master title style Jefferies 2013 Global Industrials Conference Click to edit Master subtitle style Paul Kuc Chief Financial Officer August 12, 2013 Safe
More informationSponsored by Farm Foundation USDA Office of Energy Policy and New Uses USDA Economic Research Service
Proceedings of a conference February 12-13, 2008 Atlanta, Georgia Sponsored by Farm Foundation USDA Office of Energy Policy and New Uses USDA Economic Research Service Economic Analysis of Farm-Level Supply
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Howard Learner, John Moore and Andy Olsen, Environmental Law and Policy Center
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: RE: All Colleagues Howard Learner, John Moore and Andy Olsen, Environmental Law and Policy Center Summary of the 2008 Farm Bill s Energy Title and Other New Clean Energy Development
More informationBiomass Supply. Improving lives through science and technology. Robert V. Avant, Jr., P.E. Bioenergy Program Director Texas A&M AgriLife Research
Biomass Supply Improving lives through science and technology Robert V. Avant, Jr., P.E. Bioenergy Program Director Texas A&M AgriLife Research THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Texas A&M AgriLIFE 11 Universities
More informationUNESCAP APCAEM : Regional Forum on Bio-energy Sector Development. Dr. Chang-Gil Kim
UNESCAP APCAEM : Regional Forum on Bio-energy Sector Development Dr. Chang-Gil Kim Contents I Introduction II Contents of the Kyoto Protocol and Post-2012 Discussions III IV V Instruments for GHGs Control
More information