Informational Meeting- March 31, Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study
|
|
- Christina Butler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Informational Meeting- March 31, 2016 Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study
2 Agenda Introductions Work Completed to Date Phase 1 Evaluations Alternatives Evaluations Economic Evaluations Draft Watershed Plan Development Investigation and Analysis Report Environmental Evaluation (EE) Questions/Discussions
3 Introductions NPIC Golder NRCS Guests sign-in sheet April 5,
4 Dam Locations and Watershed April 5,
5 Watershed Dam B-2 April 5,
6 Watershed Dam B-3 April 5,
7 FEMA Regulatory Floodplains April 5,
8 Impact of New Hazard Classification The new hazard classification for both B-2 and B-3 has been raised from significant to high based on downstream development Colorado Dam Safety Requirements: Inflow Design Flood (IDF) Significant Hazard: 50% PMP Event High Hazard: 90% PMP Event NRCS Dam Safety Requirements: Inflow Design Flood (IDF) Full PMF Event Current spillways do not meet capacity requirements April 5,
9 Regulatory Floodplain Benefits Dam Drainage Area (sq mi) Storage at Crest (acft) Q 100 without Dam (cfs) Q 100 with Dam (cfs) Sunny Day Breach Discharge (cfs) Residences in Breach Zone B ,000 17,500 (20,080) ,900 >1,000 B ,410 4,950 (5,850) ,500 >1,000 FEMA FIS: Boxelder Creek Upstream of I-25 near Wellington, Q 100 = 1,170 cfs Coal Creek at Town of Wellington, Q 100 = 830 cfs April 5,
10 Dam Breach Inundation Maps April 5,
11 Purpose & Need Dams were originally constructed to protect agricultural land from flooding Dams now protect developed portions within Larimer County, Wellington, Fort Collins and Timnath Hazard classification has been raised by the Colorado DWR from Significant to High (spillway capacity requirements have changed) Desire to maintain flood control benefits Develop alternatives to meet all current Colorado DWR and NRCS dam safety requirements Minimize environmental, socio-economic and cultural resource impacts and damages April 5,
12 Watershed Planning Study Components Phase 1: Collection and Analysis of Information (May-Aug, 2015) Phase 2: Formulation and Evaluation of Alternatives (Sept-Mar, 2015) Phase 3: Watershed Plan Supplement Preparation (Apr-Jul, 2016) April 5,
13 Work Completed to Date Reviewed Previous Work Developed Purpose and Need Statement Developed Work Plan Developed Public Participation Plan Performed environmental and cultural resources field surveys Completed preliminary hydrologic and Incremental Damage Assessment (IDA) evaluations Completed embankment stability evaluations Completed sediment deposition evaluations Developed alternatives for modifications Commenced economic evaluations Progressed Environmental Evaluation (EE) spreadsheets April 5,
14 Public Participation Informational Meetings Public Meetings (3 scheduled) Web Page: April 5,
15 Field Assessments Summary Conducted environmental and cultural resources field surveys Environment/Wildlife: Raptor nests Cultural Resources: Archaelogic sites identified in study area Irrigation turnout may require special consideration Wetlands: Wetlands delineation prior to construction 404 Nationwide permit Compensatory wetlands for disturbed areas No significant findings that would limit construction of modifications April 5,
16 Geotechnical Evaluations Summary Large amount of subsurface data exists for B-2 and B-3 collected as part of original design Embankments and structures appear to be in good condition Geotechnical stability evaluations indicate no issues with embankment stability in their current condition April 5,
17 Condition Assessment Summary Existing facilities are in relatively good condition requiring no major repairs Sediment deposition within the reservoirs has been minimal April 5,
18 Hydrologic Evaluations Summary Incorporated USBR methodology consistent with State of Colorado guidelines Infiltration/soil based on GIS datasets USBR Unit Hydrograph methodology Evaluated General and Local (Thunderstorm) events Areal reduction for Local Storm event PMF reduced by 25-40% (General Storm) and 70-80% (Local Storm) from previous NRCS evaluations General Storm produces highest peak discharges Dams would overtop under the greater than 25% (B-2) and 40% (B-3) PMF events April 5,
19 Determination of Inflow Design Flood (IDF) Based on current hazard classification, dam needs to safely convey percent of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) event Both NRCS and State of Colorado criteria allow for determining a different design flood based on evaluating incremental damages Differences in peak discharges between no dam and dam breach scenarios used to screen for appropriate design flood Evaluated increase in flood depths and velocities associated with a dam failure versus no dam scenario for various ratios of the PMF event: Incremental depth increases are less than 2 feet The product of the incremental depth and average cross section velocity is less than 7 April 5,
20 Preliminary Incremental Damage Assessment (IDA) Hydrologic model used to estimate ratios of the PMF for cases 1) with dam, 2) without the dam in place, and 3) assuming an overtopping dam failure Boxelder B-2 Boxelder B-3 PMP 90% PMP 75% PMP 50% PMP 40% PMP 30% PMP With Dam (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) Overtop Depth (feet) Without Dam (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) Dam Breach (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) With Dam (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) Overtop Depth (feet) Without Dam (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) Dam Breach (Peak Flow, cfs) (El. Ft AMSL) 156, , ,444 84,910 85, ,769 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5, , , ,219 76,395 76, ,059 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5, , , ,476 63,616 63, ,262 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5, ,926 78, ,477 42,176 42, ,467 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5, ,483 62, ,600 32,898 34,095 N/A 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5, ,714 47, ,999 22,589 25,571 N/A 5, N/A 5, , N/A 5,488.4 April 5,
21 50% General Storm Hydrographs April 5,
22 75% General Storm Hydrographs April 5,
23 B2 Incremental Damage Assessment April 5,
24 B-3 Incremental Damage Assessment April 5,
25 Incremental Damage Assessment Summary Hydraulic model evaluated for both the no dam and dam breach flood scenarios for various ratios of the PMF event Comparison of increase in depth and increase in depth-velocity product for the no dam and dam breach scenarios Event B-2 B year Dam does not overtop Dam does not overtop 30-percent PMF Dam overtops; failure unlikely Dam does not overtop 40-percent PMF Dam overtops; incremental depth greater than 2 ; depth-velocity product greater than 7 50-percent PMF Dam overtops; incremental depth greater than 2 ; depth-velocity product greater than 7 75-percent PMF Dam overtops; incremental depth greater than 2 ; depth-velocity product greater than 7 in some areas Dam overtops; failure unlikely Dam overtops; incremental depth greater than 2 ; depthvelocity product greater than 7 in some areas Dam overtops; incremental depth less than 2 ; depthvelocity product less than 7 90-percent PMF Full PMF Dam overtops; incremental depth less than 2 ; depthvelocity product less than 7 Dam overtops; incremental depth less than 2 ; depthvelocity product less than 7 Dam overtops; incremental depth less than 2 ; depthvelocity product less than 7 Dam overtops; incremental depth less than 2 ; depthvelocity product less than 7 April 5,
26 Recommended Inflow Design Flood B2: Full PMF Event B3: 90-percent PMF Event April 5,
27 Preliminary Alternatives Future Without Project (No Action Alternative) Decommissioning Auxiliary Spillway Modifications Modify crest (ogee, labyrinth) Lower crest; install gates Widening/lowering of existing spillway Embankment Crest Raise Overtopping Protection Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) Articulated Concrete Blocks (ACB) Geosynthetics/Turf Reinforcement Mats (TRM) Secondary Emergency Spillway New Secondary Spillway Fuseplugs in Embankment April 5,
28 Future Without Project (No Action) Assumes no Federal or outside funding for modifications Breaching of embankment would likely be required by Colorado DWR Embankment and hydraulic structures would remain in place April 5,
29 Decommissioning Design breach to meet all NRCS and State requirements Breach would need to be 200 feet wide with 3H:1V side slopes and armoured Demolition of all hydraulic structures and reclamation Re-establishment of stream channel April 5,
30 Auxilllary Spillway Modifications Widening/lowering of spillway Increased spillway hydraulic efficiency Ogee crest structure Labyrinth crest structure Lowering of spillway and installation of fusegates April 5,
31 Embankment Crest Raise Raise embankment crest to increase freeboard and spillway capacity Abutments and upstream development limit height of embankment crest raise Dam B-2 April 5,
32 Overtopping Protection Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) overtopping protection Alternative overtopping materials Geotextiles Articulated Concrete Blocks (ACB) April 5,
33 Secondary Emergency Spillway Installation of a new secondary spillway on the abutment Installation of a fuseplug within the embankment April 5,
34 Alternatives Considered in Evaluations No Action (Future Without Project) Decommissioning RCC Overtopping Protection TRM Overtopping Protection ACB Overtopping Protection Existing Auxiliary Spillway Widening/Lowering Auxiliary Fuseplug Spillway in Embankment April 5,
35 No Action (Future Without Project)-B2 April 5,
36 No Action (Future Without Project)-B3 April 5,
37 Breaching vs. Decommissioning Breach Alternative Decommissioning Alternative April 5,
38 Overtopping Alternatives April 5,
39 Existing Spillway Widening-B2 April 5,
40 Existing Spillway Modifications-B3 April 5,
41 Auxiliary Fuseplug Spillway-B2 April 5,
42 Auxiliary Fuseplug Spillway-B3 April 5,
43 Estimated Construction Costs 1,2 Alternative B-2 B-3 Future without Project 3 $3.6M $1.6M Decommissioning 3 $3.8M $1.7M RCC Overtopping Protection $27.6M $11.6M TRM Overtopping Protection $15.2M $7.2M ACB Overtopping Protection $28.1M $12.7M Existing Spillway Modifications $8.6M $2.4M Auxiliary Fuseplug Spillway in Embankment $6.1M $2.4M 1. Costs are for planning purposes only and do not include permitting, legal and land acquisition fees. 2. Costs include 25% contingency. 3. Costs do not include additional costs for floodproofing, buyouts, downstream flood protection. Actual costs for implementation would be much greater. April 5,
44 Recommended Alternatives Dam B-2 Future Without Project (No Action) Auxiliary Fuseplug Spillway in Embankment Dam B-3 Future Without Project (No Action) Existing Emergency Spillway Modifications Auxiliary Fuseplug in Embankment April 5,
45 Impacts of Decommissioning Approximately 2,300 structures in downstream floodplain impacted as a result of decommissioning B2 (majority within Town of Wellington) Approximately 1,800 structures in downstream floodplain impacted as a result of decommissioning B3 (majority within Town of Wellington) Downstream structures constructed by the Boxelder Regional Stormwater Authority would not function as designed Several road crossings (including I-25) impacted Currently performing economic evaluations to estimate benefit-cost of the various alternatives Benefit: Reduction in damages of keeping dams in service Large benefit for events up to 100-year frequency event Minimal benefit for very extreme flooding events April 5,
46 Potential Funding Sources Project Sponsors Federal Agencies NRCS - anticipated to fund up to 65% of the eligible project cost not to exceed 100% of construction costs FEMA Grants Stakeholders April 5,
47 Watershed Plan Schedule Preliminary Watershed Plan for Internal Review (end of April, 2016) Draft Watershed Plan for NRCS Review (mid-may, 2016) Public Meeting No. 3 (mid-june, 2016) Final Watershed Plan (late-july, 2016) April 5,
48 Discussion/Questions/Comments April 5,
Informational Meeting- July 21, Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study
Informational Meeting- July 21, 2015 Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study Agenda Introductions Background & History Purpose & Need NRCS Watershed Planning Program Work Completed to Date Longer term
More informationSupplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. 10 for Neshaminy Creek Watershed Core Creek Dam (PA-620) Bucks County, Pennsylvania
Supplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. 10 for Neshaminy Creek Watershed Core Creek Dam (PA-620) Bucks County, Pennsylvania Project Authorization USDA's Small Watershed Program is carried out under the
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Bremo Power Station CCR Surface Impoundment: North Ash Pond INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN Bremo Power Station CCR Surface Impoundment: North Ash Pond Submitted To: Bremo Power Station 1038 Bremo Bluff Road Bremo
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any
More informationV. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
V. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 5.1 Formulation of Drainage Improvements As indicated in Chapter 4, following the completion of the hydrologic analysis associated with future land use conditions, drainage improvements
More informationUnited States Army Corps of Engineers. Addicks and Barker Dam Safety Update
United States Army Corps of Engineers Addicks and Barker Dam Safety Update COL Richard P. Pannell District Commander, Galveston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 9, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationPrepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
BERM FAILURE TECHNICAL ANALYSES SOUTH PLATTE GRAVEL PIT EVALUATION CRITERIA Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Wright Water Engineers, Inc. January 2013 121-030.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationAppendix J Hydrology and Hydraulics
Appendix J Hydrology and Hydraulics Marsh Lake Dam Ecosystems Restoration Feasibility Study Hydraulics & Hydrology Appendix January 2011 Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables iii I. General 1 II.
More informationIII. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES
III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES Within the Growth Management Boundary, the existing storm drainage facilities are largely associated with development that has historically occurred in the ten drainage
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationLooking at Dam Safety from a Resiliency Perspective. February 23, 2017
Looking at Dam Safety from a Resiliency Perspective February 23, 2017 1 Discussion Outline Dam Safety 101 (10 min) Fort Hood Overview (5 min) Resiliency Framework (5 min) Fort Hood Dam Safety Program (15
More informationDistribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
CECW-EH-Y Engineer Regulation 1110-8-2(FR) Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Engineering and Design INFLOW DESIGN FLOODS FOR DAMS AND RESERVOIRS ER 1110-8-2(FR)
More informationTable of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...
Chapter 5 Table of Contents 5-1 Introduction... 1 5-1-1 Stormwater Quality Considerations... 1 5-1-2 Stormwater Volume Considerations... 2 5-1-3 Downstream Impacts... 2 5-2 Requirements... 2 5-2-1 General
More informationPonds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.
POND SITE SELECTION AND CONSTRUCTION Uses, Planning, & Design David Krietemeyer Area Engineer USDA-NRCS June 20, 2008 Uses Considerations for Location of Commonly Used Terms Pond A water impoundment made
More informationChapter 12 Storage. Contents. Overview... 1
Chapter 12 Storage Contents Overview... 1 Implementation of Regional, Sub-regional, and On-site Detention Facilities... 2 Regional Detention... 2 Subregional Detention... 5 Onsite Detention... 6 Detention
More informationCOON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
PAN 16-112, Westwood Middle School, Page 1 of 6 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW MEETING DATE: August 22, 2016 AGENDA NUMBER: 10 FILE NUMBER: 16-112 ITEM: Westwood Middle School RECOMMENDATION:
More informationDAM SAFETY PRESENTATION REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DAM ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTS IN NEW YORK Allan Estivalet, PE
Lower Hudson Regional Conference Carmel, NY DAM SAFETY PRESENTATION REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DAM ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTS IN NEW YORK Allan Estivalet, PE July 24, 2015 NEW YORK STATE DAM SAFETY REGULATIONS
More informationCarbon Creek Channel (OCFCD Facility No. B01) from upstream Intersection of Western/Orange to upstream Beach Boulevard.
Carbon Creek Channel (OCFCD Facility. B01) from Lead Agency: Agency: Project Director: Address: Orange County, Public Works, Infrastructure Programs, Capital Programs Sam Ali 300 N. Flower Street Santa
More informationDam Safety & Planning: Examples of Collaboration and Lessons Learned
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG Dam Safety & Planning: Examples of Collaboration and Lessons Learned Eric Halpin, P.E. Special Assistant for Dam & Levee Safety, HQUSACE Maria
More informationCHOLLA POWER PLANT BOTTOM ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_Inflowflood_003_
CHOLLA POWER PLANT BOTTOM ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_Inflowflood_003_20161017 This Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan (Plan) document has been prepared specifically for the
More informationProject Drainage Report
Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2A - General Information 2A-4 Project Drainage Report A. Purpose The purpose of the project drainage report is to identify and propose specific solutions to stormwater
More informationVolume 2, Chapter 10 - Storage
Volume 2, Chapter 10 - Storage Users Guidance: If a UDFCD Section number in this chapter is skipped: It was adopted as is; please refer to that Section in the corresponding UDFCD Manual, Volume, Chapter
More informationSan Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis
San Antonio Water System enhancement. This recommendation was based on limited water quality data provided by SAWS and using a free-water surface constructed wetland with approximately 112 acres of wetted
More informationPresentation Overview
Little Dry Creek Restoration Deep River Flood Risk Management Final Presentation to LCRBDC June 10, 2015 Presentation Overview Project Overview & Background Information Data Collection Model Development
More informationDevelopments in the Safety and Security of Mining Industry Dams
Developments in the Safety and Security of Mining Industry Dams John W. Fredland, P.E. Civil Engineer / Dam Safety Officer Mine Safety and Health Administration Tailings and Mine Waste `08 Conference Dam-Safety
More informationCHOLLA POWER PLANT FLY ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_InflowFlood_002_
CHOLLA POWER PLANT FLY ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_InflowFlood_002_20161017 This Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan (Plan) document has been prepared specifically for the Fly
More informationFullerton Creek Channel (OCFCD Facility No. A03) from downstream Beach Blvd. including undercrossing to downstream I-5 Freeway.
Fullerton Creek Channel (OCFCD Facility. A03) Lead Agency: Agency: Project Director: Address: Orange County, Public Works, Infrastructure Programs, Capital Programs Sam Ali 300 N. Flower Street Santa Ana
More informationSECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1
CITY OF THORNTON Standards and Specifications Revised: October 2012 SECTION 400 - STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 401 GENERAL PROVISIONS 400-1
More informationSECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements
SECTION 3 DRAINAGE 3-1 General All Drainage plans for proposed development shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in Virginia, except as noted below. Further, their seal and signature
More informationPARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012
PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No. 1894 - SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 PARR AND FAIRFIELD LOCATIONS Lockhart Neal Shoals Monticello
More informationInflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company
Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment MidAmerican Energy Company October 10, 2016 Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment Prepared for MidAmerican
More informationROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall
SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07 Ken Wolfe Warren Johnson USDA, NRCS Frederick, Maryland ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval MDE, WMA, Dam Safety Division Authority (COMAR 26.17.04.03)
More informationHYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006
HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationDAM AND CANAL SAFETY GUIDELINES
WATER ACT WATER (MINISTERIAL) REGULATION PART 6 DAM AND CANAL SAFETY GUIDELINES Prepared by: Dam Safety and Water Projects Branch Alberta Environmental Protection 8th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820-106 Street
More informationChapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements
4.0 Introduction The requirements presented in this section shall be used to aid the design engineer or applicant in the preparation of drainage reports, drainage studies, and construction drawings for
More informationNew Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations
New Castle County, DE Floodplain Regulations John J. Gysling, PE CFM Department of Land Use New Castle County, DE February 26, 2009 Today s Presentation Floodplain Protection and Uses Terms and Definitions
More informationVisual Inspection Checklist
APPENDIX Q. Visual Inspection Checklist Thispageintentionallyleftblank. VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST CITY OF AUBURN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INSPECTION YEAR: TYPE OF INSPECTION: (Informal, Regular, Formal):
More informationFINDINGS: Olsson used a three-step analysis strategy to develop a benefit cost ratio that would indicate the relative feasibility of this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINDINGS: Based on the results of this feasibility study, the Platte Republican Diversion Project would be cost-effective. With minimal improvements to the channel, and the existing bridge
More informationLyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual
Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual Prepared by: Mike Shaw Stormwater Program Manager City of Mountlake Terrace January 2010 Section I General Information This
More informationFreight Street Development Strategy
Freight Street Development Strategy Appendix B: Naugatuck River Floodplain Analysis Freight Street Development Strategy DECEMBER 2017 Page B-1 1.0 NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOODPLAIN AT FREIGHT STREET 1.1 Watershed
More informationConstructed Wetland Pond T-8
Constructed Wetland Pond T-8 Description A constructed wetlands pond is a shallow retention pond designed to permit the growth of wetland plants such as rushes, willows, and cattails. Constructed wetlands
More informationTVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4
2011 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference May 9-12, 2011 in Denver, CO, USA http://www.flyash.info/ TVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4 Improving Operations While Preparing for Closure May 10,
More informationCHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation
CHAPTER 7 San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation This chapter includes a range of adaptation measures to address vulnerabilities from flooding along the San Dieguito River, including the river valley,
More informationStantec Consulting Services Inc Lebanon Road, Cincinnati, OH 45241
Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 11687 Lebanon Road, Cincinnati, OH 45241 File: 175534017 Revision 0 Ohio Valley Electric Corporation 3932 U.S. Route 23 P.O. Box 468 Piketon, Ohio 45661 RE: Run-on and
More informationAbstract. Introduction. Table 1. Millsite Dam Critical Elevations Feature Dam Crest Spillway Existing Elevation (NAVD88) 6222.
MILLSITE DAM ARCED LABYRINTH WEIR DESIGN: APPLYING RESEARCH AND MODELING FOR AN ATYPICAL APPROACH CONDITION Aaron C. Spencer, P.E. 1, Blake Tullis, PhD 2 Abstract Millsite Dam, located in Ferron, Utah
More informationNEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT through (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL Office use only: Received by Municipality: Received by
More informationChapter 11 Culverts and Bridges
Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 General Design... 1 2.1 Design Criteria... 1 2.2 Design Flows... 1 2.3 Permitting and Regulations... 1 2.4 Aesthetics and Safety... 2
More informationMountain States Chapter International Erosion Control Association Conference
Mountain States Chapter International Erosion Control Association Conference November 5, 2015 Ian Paton, P.E, CFM Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Eliot Wong P.E., CFM Contech Engineered Solutions Hayes Lenhart,
More informationKentucky Dam Safety Hazard Mitigation Driving Local Mitigation Actions through Risk Map
Kentucky Dam Safety Hazard Mitigation Driving Local Mitigation Actions through Risk Map Michelle Meehan, PE Carey Johnson ASFPM 2013 Conference June 12, 2013 What We ll Talk About Today Overview of KDOW
More informationClassification and Inflow Design Flood Criteria
Classification and Inflow Design Flood Criteria Technical Bulletin Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources This publication is available online at: Ontario.ca/dams Ces documents sont offerts en anglais seulement
More informationUncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation
Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation Introduction Estimation of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) has become a core component of the hydrotechnical design of dam structures 1. There is
More informationAbstract. 1. Main features of the Cua Dat scheme. Hong Giang VNCOLD. Hanoi Vietnam. the Northern Central The reservoir storage purposes: - water
The diversion works for the Cua Dat CFRD in Vietnam Michel Ho Ta Khanh, Dinh Sy Quat, Prof Pham Hong Giang VNCOLD No 95/10 Chua Boc Street Dong Da District Hanoi Vietnam Abstract The Cua Dat CFRD is constructed
More informationNorthland Regional Council. Awanui Flood Scheme Preliminary Design
REPORT Northland Regional Council Awanui Flood Scheme Preliminary Design REPORT Northland Regional Council Awanui Flood Scheme Preliminary Design Report prepared for: NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Report
More informationDoes Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?
Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed? John C. Tracy, Director Idaho Water Resources Research Institute
More informationHydrologic Calibration:
Hydrologic Calibration: UPDATE OF EFFECTIVE HYDROLOGY FOR MARYS CREEK October 2010 Agenda Background Hydrologic model Calibrated rainfall Hydrologic calibration 100 year discharges, Existing Conditions
More informationHydrology and Flooding
Hydrology and Flooding Background The 1996 flood Between February 4, 1996 and February 9, 1996 the Nehalem reporting station received 28.9 inches of rain. Approximately 14 inches fell in one 48 hour period.
More informationCCR Certification: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for the
Submitted to Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company dba Vectren Power Supply, Inc. (SIGECO) One Vectren Square Evansville, IN 4778 Submitted by AECOM 94 Amberglen Boulevard Austin, Texas 78729 October
More informationDam Safety Program. Managing Risk to Support the Core Mission. Karen Weghorst, P.E. Manager, Flood Hydrology and Consequences Group
Dam Safety Program Managing Risk to Support the Core Mission Karen Weghorst, P.E. Manager, Flood Hydrology and Consequences Group Reclamation manages 476 dams and dikes in the Western 17 United States
More informationFargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Flood Risk Management Project
Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Flood Risk Management Project 52ND ANNUAL IOWA ASCE ENVIRONMENTAL & WATER RESOURCES CONFERENCE 03 April 2014 Aaron W. Buesing Senior Hydraulic Engineer Corps of Engineers,
More informationFolsom Dam Water Control Manual Update
Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Stakeholder Discussion October 31, 2013 Location: Tsakopoulos Library Galleria, East Room, 828 I Street, Sacramento US Army Corps of Engineers WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN CFR 257.82 Bottom Ash Pond Big Sandy Plant Louisa, Kentucky October, 2016 Prepared for: Kentucky Power Big Sandy Plant Louisa, Kentucky Prepared by: American Electric Power
More informationMill Pond Dam Modifications Feasibility Study
May 1, 2013 Mill Pond Dam Modifications Feasibility Study Village of Goodrich, MI Table of Contents 1. Background...1 1.1 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Regulation Dam Safety Unit
More informationStormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia
Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Adopted November 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 2 2.1.1.
More informationLower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM
PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM Non-Structural Measure Descriptions Elevate Critical Infrastructure This measure would raise at-risk critical structures above the design inundation level. Elevation would be
More informationChapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall
6.0 Introduction This chapter summarizes methodology for determining rainfall and runoff information for the design of stormwater management facilities in the City. The methodology is based on the procedures
More informationCCR Rule Report: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan For Ash Basin B At Brayton Point Power Station
Submitted to Brayton Point Energy, LLC 1 Brayton Point Rd., Somerset, MA 02725 Submitted by AECOM 1001 Highlands Plaza Drive West Suite 300 St. Louis, MO 63110 CCR Rule Report: Initial Inflow Design Flood
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Bottom Ash Pond Sherburne County Generating Plant Introduction This report presents documentation and certification of the
More informationFilter Tube Barriers (Instream)
Filter Tube Barriers (Instream) INSTREAM PRACTICES Flow Control No Channel Flow Dry Channels Erosion Control Low Channel Flows Shallow Water Sediment Control High Channel Flows Deep Water Symbol Photo
More informationWater Balance and Regulation Alternative Analysis for Kajakai Reservoir using HEC-ResSim
US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Water Balance and Regulation Alternative Analysis for Kajakai Reservoir using HEC-ResSim Phase I and II Final Report December 2007 Approved for
More informationMODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville
MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual City of Centerville Adopted December 6, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 1 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 1 2.1.1. Discharge
More informationPAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT A. GENERAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY - FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY RIVERINE STRUCTURES FORM O.M.B No. 1660-0016 Expires: 12/31/2010 PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT Public reporting burden for this form
More informationS.R. 4031, SECTION FVR OVER BEAVER RUN SEGMENT 0170, OFFSET 6093 EAST NANTMEAL TOWNSHIP, CHESTER CO. ENGINEERING DISTRICT 6-0
S.R. 4031, SECTION FVR OVER BEAVER RUN SEGMENT 0170, OFFSET 6093 EAST NANTMEAL TOWNSHIP, CHESTER CO. ENGINEERING DISTRICT 6-0 HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC STUDY REPORT OCTOBER 2007 Prepared For: Prepared By:
More informationJune 22, Francis E. Borcalli, P.E.
CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN SYMPOSIUM Managing the Settling Basin Who s Doing What! June 22, 2009 Francis E. Borcalli, P.E. CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN SYMPOSIUM Managing the Settling Basin Who s Doing What!
More informationThis material was downloaded from the website Please contact the PhillyH2O webmaster for more information about this material.
This material was downloaded from the website www.phillyh2o.org Please contact the PhillyH2O webmaster for more information about this material. Modernization and Optimization of Existing Dams and Reservoirs
More informationLocal Flood Hazard Mitigation Program. A framework for hazard mitigation in the NYC West of Hudson Water Supply Watersheds
Local Flood Hazard Mitigation Program A framework for hazard mitigation in the NYC West of Hudson Water Supply Watersheds Flood Hazard Mitigation Defined 2 2 Presentation Overview Why and how is the NYC
More informationUrban Hydrology Characteristics and their Influence on Urban Stream Restoration Technology. Presented by:
Urban Hydrology Characteristics and their Influence on Urban Stream Restoration Technology Presented by: Michael Clar Ecosite, Inc. James Gracie Brightwater, Inc. BACKGROUND Many streams in urban areas
More informationSUMMARY OF HYDROLOGICAL SPECIALIST STUDY
SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGICAL SPECIALIST STUDY The Government of the Republic of Mozambique (GOM) has received a grant from the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), an innovative United States established
More informationStorm Water & Drainage Projects 2011 Program Update
Storm Water & Drainage Projects 2011 Program Update Calf Run Montgomery Woods Owls Nest New Castle County Department of Special Services County Storm Water & Drainage Programs Waterway maintenance NPDES
More informationConstructed Wetland Channel T-9
Description A constructed wetland channel is a conveyance BMP that is built, in part, to enhance stormwater quality. Constructed wetland channels use dense vegetation to slow down runoff and allow time
More informationWill be modified map from GIS 6/16 EOD
Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District Judicial Ditch #19 Watershed Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) Public Scoping Meeting September 26, 2016 Will be modified map from GIS 6/16
More information2A Stormwater Regulations and Permitting A. Iowa Drainage Law and Resources 1 B. Regulated Activities 1
Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater Table of Contents TOC Table of Contents Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2A General Information 2A-1--------------------------------General Information A. Concept... 1 B. Informing
More informationPRESENTATION FOR THE POTENTIAL ADDITION OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
PRESENTATION FOR THE POTENTIAL ADDITION OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS 1 255 255 255 237 237 237 217 217 217 200 200 200 Part 1: Summary of Floodplain Analysis for Los 0 Angeles 163 131 River239 110 112
More informationAppendix VI: Illustrative example
Central Valley Hydrology Study (CVHS) Appendix VI: Illustrative example November 5, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Prepared by: David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc. Table of contents
More informationCreated by Simpo PDF Creator Pro (unregistered version) Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq
Lect.No.9 2 nd Semester Barrages, Regulators, Dams 1 of 15 In order to harness the water potential of a river optimally, it is necessary to construct two types of hydraulic structures, as shown in Figure
More informationWatershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)
A. B. Brown History of Construction 40 CFR 257.73 (c) (i.) (ii.) (iii.) Owner Name: Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company dba Vectren Power Supply Owner Address: One Vectren Square, PO Box 209, Evansville,
More informationFlood Hazard Assessment Report Falls Gulch, Larimer County, Colorado January 16, 2013
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Denver Federal Center Building 56, Room 2604 P.O. Box 25426 Denver, CO 80225 720-544-2818-OFFICE alton.albin@co.usda.gov Flood
More informationSTATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES GUIDELINES FOR DAM BREACH ANALYSIS
STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DAM SAFETY BRANCH GUIDELINES FOR DAM BREACH ANALYSIS February 10, 2010 Telephone (303) 866-3581
More informationInformation for File # PRH
Information for File # 2016-02602-PRH Applicant Corps Contact Tom Morley Paul Hauser Address 152 Baker Drive, Redwood Falls, MN 56283 E-Mail Paul.R.Hauser@usace.army.mil Phone 651-290-5357 Primary County
More informationTemporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts
Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent Symbol
More informationFarmington Dam Repurpose Project
Farmington Dam Repurpose Project 2017 $158,100,000 to re-purpose the Farmington Dam from flood protection only to a long-term water storage facility that increases water supply reliability to the region.
More informationIAFSM 2010 Annual Conference. City of Rockford Keith Creek Greenway Flood Mitigation Project
IAFSM 2010 Annual Conference City of Rockford Keith Creek Greenway Flood Mitigation Project March 10, 2010 Introduction Problem Overview 1890 s Building of homes along Keith Creek 1920 s Home construction
More information2 Hydrology Studies. 2.1 Introduction
2 Hydrology Studies Report by: C. Cadou, P. Eng. 2.1 Introduction The objective of this analysis was to review the hydrological/hydraulic and energy production components of studies carried out to date
More informationSECTION 7.0 PROJECT FEASIBILITY, ENGINEER S RECOMMENDATION AND DESIGN ISSUES NEEDING RESOLUTION
SECTION 7.0 PROJECT FEASIBILITY, ENGINEER S RECOMMENDATION AND DESIGN ISSUES NEEDING RESOLUTION 7.1 PROJECT FEASIBILITY The determination of project feasibility is based upon several criteria established
More informationStormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals
Page 1 of 7 Florence County MS4 Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals Please indicate the location and page number(s) where each item below
More information