Comparative Evaluation Option #1 & Option #2
|
|
- Kathryn McKinney
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comparative Evaluation Option #1 & Option #2 Option #1 Existing Landfill Approx. 47 metres/14 stories Proposed Layout Approx. 31 metres/9.5 stories Option #2 Existing Landfill Approx. 47 metres/14 stories Proposed Layout Approx. 33 metres/10 stories 25
2 Comparative Evaluation Option #3 & Option #4 Option #3 Existing Landfill Approx. 47 metres/14 stories Proposed Layout Approx. 27 metres/8 stories Option #4 Existing Landfill Approx. 47 metres/14 stories Proposed Layout Approx. 30 metres/9 stories 26
3 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Component Aboriginal Archaeology & Cultural Heritage Biology - Terrestrial & Aquatic Environment Criteria Indicators Option #1 Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Potential effects Potential effects on use of on Aboriginal lands for traditional communities purposes. Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Cultural and Cultural and heritage heritage resources on-site and in resources vicinity and predicted NET Archaeological resources impacts on them. Criteria Ranking: 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 3rd Options 2 and 3 are preferred as these options result in minimal effects on Cultural Landscape Units and Built Heritage Features. Presence of archaeological resources on-site. Significance of on-site archaeology resources potentially displaced/disturbed. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the Options in relation to Archaeological resources. All options rank the same. Environmental Component Ranking 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 3 rd Terrestrial ecosystems Aquatic ecosystems Predicted impact on vegetation communities due to project. Predicted impact on wildlife habitat due to project. Predicted impact of project on vegetation and wildlife including rare, threatened or endangered species. NET NET NET NET Criteria Ranking: Tied 1 st Tied 1 st 4 th 3 rd Options 1 and 2 are preferred as they result in the least amount of vegetation being removed, least amount of wildlife habitat, including amphibian habitat and vegetated habitat for area sensitive birds. Predicted changes in water quality. Predicted impact on aquatic habitat due to project. Predicted impact on aquatic biota due to project. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd Options 2 and 3 are preferred as they do not include any streams (permanent or intermittent) and therefore no net effects on aquatic habitat. Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd 27
4 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Criteria Component Atmospheric Air Quality Indicators Modelled Landfill Gas Emissions: Vinyl Chloride; Benzene; Hydrogen Sulphide Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses, and institutions). Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Criteria Ranking: 2 nd 4 th 1 st 3 rd No exceedances with modelled landfill gas emissions for any option; however, Option 3 is marginally preferred because modelled emissions were slightly lower off-site with this option. Modelled Dust Emissions: Total Suspended Particulate Matter; Inhalable Particulate Matter (PM10); Respirable Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses, and institutions). NET NET Criteria Ranking: 4 th 1 st 3 rd 2 nd Option 2 is preferred as there are no receptors off-site that are affected by modelled dust emissions. Modelled Combustion Emissions: Carbon Monoxide; Nitrogen Oxides Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses, and institutions). Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd No exceedances with modelled combustion emissions for any option; however, Options 1 and 3 are marginally preferred because modelled impacts were slightly lower off-site with these options. 28
5 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Component Criteria Indicators Option #1 Atmospheric Odour Predicted odour emissions. Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, businesses and institutions). Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Criteria Ranking: 1 st Tied for 2 nd Tied for 2 nd Tied for 2 nd No exceedances with predicted odour emissions for any option; however, Option 1 is marginally preferred because modelled emissions are slightly lower off-site with this option. Noise Predicted site-related noise. NET Number of off-site receptors potentially affected (residential properties, public facilities, NET businesses, and institutions). Criteria Ranking: 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Options 2 and 3 are preferred as they will result in minimal site-related noise and affect the least amount of off-site receptors (1). Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 2 nd Tied for 2 nd 1 st Tied for 2 nd 29
6 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Criteria Component Economic Effects on the cost of services to customers Continued service to customers Economic benefit to local municipality Effects on residential and commercial development Effects on property tax revenue on the City of Ottawa Indicators Ratio of air space achieved to volume of soil to be excavated and area of cell base and leachate collection system to be constructed. Option #1 Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #2 Option #3 NET Option #4 NET Criteria Ranking: 2 nd 1 st 3 rd 4 th Option 2 is preferred as the ratio of airspace achieved to volume of soil to be excavated provides the maximum benefit from a cost of service to customers perspective. Total optimized site capacity and site life. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the options in relation to continued service to customers. Employment at site (number and duration). (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT NET EFFECT NET EFFECT NET EFFECT Opportunities to provide HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH products or services. (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) NET NET NET NET Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the Options in relation to economic benefit to the local municipality. Residential development plans. Commercial development plans. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the options in relation to effects on residential and commercial developments. City of Ottawa. LOW LOW (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT NET EFFECT NET EFFECT NET EFFECT Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC). LOW (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT LOW (POSITIVE) NET EFFECT Criteria Ranking: Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd Options 2 and 3 are preferred as they result in greatest positive net effect on the City of Ottawa s property tax revenue. Environmental Component Ranking 2 nd 1 st 3 rd 4 th 30
7 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Component Land Use Site Design & Operations Criteria Effects on current and planned future land uses Displacement of agricultural land Indicators Current land use. Planned future land use. Type(s) and proximity of off-site recreational resources within 500 m of landfill footprint potentially affected. Type(s) and proximity of off-site sensitive land uses (i.e., dwellings, churches, cemeteries, parks) within 500 m of landfill footprint potentially affected. Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 NET NET NET Criteria Ranking: 3 rd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 2 nd Options 2 and 3 are slightly preferred over Options 1 and 4 as the loss of current land uses are marginally less, the options are consistent with planned future land uses, and there are few sensitive land uses within 500 metres. Current land use. Predicted impacts on surrounding agricultural operations. Type(s) and proximity of agricultural operations (i.e., organic, cash crop, livestock) and intensive farm operations in surrounding area. NET NET Criteria Ranking: Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd Options 2 and 3 are preferred over Options 1 and 4 as the farm infrastructure is preserved west of William Mooney Road, as well as the part-time beef farm. Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 2 nd Site design & operations Complexity of site infrastructure. NET NET HIGH NET characteristics Operational flexibility. Environmental Component Ranking 3 rd 1 st 2 nd 4 th 31
8 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Component Geology and Hydrogeology Criteria Groundwater quality Indicators Predicted effects to groundwater quality at property boundaries and offsite. Option #1 Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the options in relation to groundwater quality. All options rank the same. Groundwater Predicted groundwater flow flow characteristics. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the options in relation to groundwater flow. All options rank the same. Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Surface Water Surface Resources water quality Predicted effects on surface water quality on-site and offsite. Criteria Ranking: 3 rd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 2 nd Option 2 and 3 are preferred because they will both use groundwater infiltration as a method of discharge after TSS removal by the sediment forebay. Surface water Change in drainage areas. quantity Predicted occurrence and degree of off-site effects. Criteria Ranking: 1 st 3 rd 4 th 2 nd Option 1 is preferred because it uses surface outlet controls, rather than groundwater infiltration, to attenuate flows and does not change the existing surface flow regime on South Huntley Creek. Environmental Component Ranking 3rd 1st 2nd 4th 32
9 Comparative Evaluation Environmental Component Social Criteria Visual impact of the facility Indicators Predicted changes in perceptions of landscapes and views. Option #1 Alternative Landfill Footprint Options Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Criteria Ranking: 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 2 nd Options 2 and 3 are preferred as they have the least predicted net effects from a visual perspective. Local residents Number of residences. HIGH NET NET NET Criteria Ranking: 4 th 2 nd 3 rd 1 st Option 4 is preferred because the fewest number of residences are located within 500 m of this footprint. Recreational facilities Transportation Effects on airport operations Type(s) and proximity of off-site recreational resources within 500 m of landfill footprint potentially affected. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st : There is no distinction between the Options in relation to recreational facilities. All options rank the same. Environmental Component Ranking 2 nd Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 2 nd Effects from truck transport along access roads Bird strike hazard to aircraft in Local Study Area. Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the Options in relation to effects on airport operations. All options rank the same. Potential for traffic HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH collisions. (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) (POSITIVE) Disturbance to traffic operations. Proposed road improvement requirements. NET HIGH (POSITIVE) NET NET HIGH (POSITIVE) NET NET HIGH (POSITIVE) NET NET HIGH (POSITIVE) NET Criteria Ranking: Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st There is no distinction between the options in relation to effects from truck transport along access roads. All options include a northbound left turn lane on Carp Road into the site. The potential closure of William Mooney Road does not impact on the criteria and indicators. All options rank the same. Environmental Component Ranking Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st Tied for 1 st 33
10 Comparative Evaluation - Evaluation Conclusions Environmental Component Archaeology & Cultural Heritage Atmospheric Aboriginal Biology (Terrestrial & Aquatic Environment) Geology & Hydrogeology Land Use Site Design & Operations Surface Water Resources Evaluation Conclusion Options #2 and #3 are most preferred as they result in minimal effects on Cultural Landscape Units and Built Heritage Features. Option #3 is most preferred as it has the lowest potential effect on off-site receptors relating to odour, landfill gas, combustion, and noise emissions. There is no distinction between the options as there are no current Aboriginal land claims related to any of the options. Options #2 and #3 are most preferred as they result in the least amount of vegetation being removed; the least amount of wildlife habitat disturbed; and there are no permanent or intermittent streams flowing through them. There is no distinction between the options as there are no off-site groundwater receptors predicted to be affected by any of the options in terms of groundwater flow or quality, given proposed mitigation measures and use of Ontario Regulation 232/98 - Generic Design Option II liner system. Options #2 and #3 are most preferred as changes to current land uses are minimized. Option #2 is most preferred as it offers highest level of operational flexibility and ease of implementation. Option #2 is most preferred as it has the lowest net effect on surface water quality and quantity. Economic Social Option #2 is most preferred as it provides the highest ratio of airspace to total soil excavated. Options #2 and #3 are most preferred as they have the fewest number of residences and recreational facilities within 500 m and the least predicted net effects from a visual perspective. There is no distinction between the options as they have the Transportation same net effects on airport operations and positive net effects Development of Terms of on Reference predicted for truck an transport along access roads. 34
11 Comparative Evaluation - Preferred Option #2 The comparative evaluation of the footprint options was completed using a Reasoned Argument or Trade-off method. This method is based on the following two activities: Identify the predicted level of effect ( No Net Effect, Low Net Effect, Moderate Net Effect or High Net Effect ) associated with each alternative for each indicator; and, Rank each alternative from most preferred to least preferred based on the predicted level of effect at the criteria and environmental component level in order to determine an overall ranking for each alternative. Option #2 was determined to be the most preferred option based on the following attributes: It has the lowest predicted net effects on Archaeological & Cultural Heritage; It has the lowest predicted net effect on Biology (Terrestrial & Aquatic environment); It has the lowest predicted net effect on Land Use; It has the lowest predicted net effect on Site Design and Operations; It has the lowest predicted net effect on Surface Water; and It has the lowest predicted net effect on Socio-Economic. While Option #2 is the most preferred option, it should be noted that there are no off-site groundwater receptors predicted to be affected by any of the options in terms of groundwater flow or quality. While Option #2 is the most preferred option, it should be noted that there are no predicted exceedences for any of the options in relation to odour, landfill gas, and combustion emissions. 35
12 Leachate Treatment Options Leachate Treatment Options WMCC amended the ToR to include an assessment and evaluation of alternative methods for treating and disposing of leachate generated from the new landfill footprint as part of the EA. Five Leachate Treatment Alternatives were identified by WMCC for assessment, based upon the company s operating experience at other landfill sites across North America. Leachate Treatment Characteristics The new landfill footprint will be designed with the Generic II Double Liner system, as specified in Ontario Regulation 232/98. This consists of (from top down): 0.3 m thick granular/perforated pipe primary leachate collection system; 0.75 m thick geomembrane/engineered clay primary liner; 0.3 m thick granular/perforated pipe secondary leachate collection system; 0.75 m thick geomembrane/engineered clay secondary liner; 1 m thick natural or constructed soil attenuation layer. Leachate collected from within the lined landfill will be pumped from the primary drainage/leachate collection system. The potential location and size of leachate pumping station(s) required will be identified as part of the conceptual design for the preferred landfill footprint. Leachate will then be directed to pretreatment and/or treatment facilities in a manner dependent on the preferred leachate treatment alternative. The volume of leachate to be managed will vary over the operational and post-closure period of the landfill and is influenced by factors including precipitation, degree of landfill development (e.g., area of landfill that is actively undergoing development versus areas where final cover has been placed), final cover design and cover installation progress, and other factors. 36
13 Leachate Treatment Option #1 On-site Tree Irrigation This alternative would involve irrigation of trees (typically poplar and/or willow) in order to dispose of the leachate. May require partial or full on-site treatment using chemical and/or biological processes to treat the leachate prior to irrigation. Treated leachate will be stored in a pond and then discharged to a tree plantation during days with suitable weather conditions. No liquid effluent would leave the WCEC site. 37
14 Leachate Treatment Option #2 On-site Leachate Evaporation This alternative would involve use of evaporator technology to dispose of leachate. Leachate from the landfill would be pumped to an equalization tank that will provide storage to handle peaks in leachate generation. Leachate would then be fed to the evaporator for processing. The evaporator system may utilize landfill gas as the energy source to evaporate the leachate or waste heat from the landfill gas cogeneration facility. Depending upon the strength of the leachate and the resulting air quality emissions, the leachate may have to be pretreated using a chemical and/or biological process prior to evaporation. These units have been widely used in the U.S. for a number of years for leachate disposal. 38
15 Leachate Treatment Option #3 Off-site Effluent Discharge to Surface Water This alternative would involve disposal of fully treated leachate by discharging it to a nearby surface watercourse. Collected leachate would be treated on-site using chemical and/or biological processes to meet Provincial Water Quality Objectives followed by storage of the treated effluent. Stored effluent would then be discharged to a surface watercourse. The nearest surface watercourse is the southern branch of the Huntley Creek which drains to the Carp River. 39
16 Leachate Treatment Option #4 Off-site Effluent Discharge to Ottawa Sanitary Sewer This alternative would involve disposal of leachate through discharging it to the City of Ottawa sanitary sewer system. Collected leachate may require pretreatment on-site using either chemical and/or biological processes in order to meet the City s sewer use bylaw. Leachate effluent would then be discharged to an existing forcemain at Carp Road and Highway 417. Effluent would be further treated at the City s Robert O. Pickard Environmental Centre (ROPEC) facility. 40
17 Leachate Treatment Option #5 Truck Haulage Off-site to Alternative Wastewater Treatment Plant This alternative would involve trucking of the leachate to one or more wastewater treatment plants outside Ottawa for disposal. Collected leachate may require pretreatment using chemical and/or biological processes if required to meet the quality parameters of the receiving wastewater treatment plant(s). Potential options for receiving the leachate in the surrounding area are not currently known. 41
18 Leachate Treatment Options Evaluation Methodology Criteria and indicators under the following environmental components are proposed in order to comparatively evaluate the leachate treatment alternatives: Atmospheric Environment Geology and Hydrogeology Surface Water Resources Biology Transportation Land Use Social Site Design and Operations Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Methodology The comparative evaluation of leachate treatment alternatives will be completed using a Reasoned Argument or Trade-off method. This method is based on the following two activities: Identify the predicted level of effect ( No Net Effect, Low Net Effect, Moderate Net Effect or High Net Effect ) associated with each alternative for each indicator; and, Rank each alternative from most preferred to least preferred based on the predicted level of effect at the criteria and environmental component level in order to determine an overall ranking for each alternative. 42
19 Next Steps Workshop #3 A future Workshop #3 is planned for November 23 rd, 2011 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Carp Agricultural Hall (3790 Carp Road, Carp). The purpose of Workshop #3 is to provide the public with an opportunity to give input on the comparative evaluation of alternative landfill footprints and the identification of a preferred landfill footprint. Please sign-up at this Open House if you wish to be involved in Workshop #3. Notification of Workshop #3 was published in local newspapers along with the advertisement for this Open House and will be published again two weeks prior to the event. Reminders will be provided to persons who have signed-up at Open House #3. Technical Sessions As requested by the community, Technical Sessions will be held on the subjects of air, groundwater, and property value impacts. The Air Technical Session is scheduled for November 16, 2011 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at WMCC s Ottawa Office (254 Westbrook Road, Ottawa). The Groundwater Technical Session is scheduled for November 30, 2011 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at WMCC s Ottawa Office (254 Westbrook Road, Ottawa). The Property Value Impact Technical Session(s) will be scheduled in the upcoming weeks. Notification will be provided on the project website and by to stakeholders registered on our project contact list. 43
20 Next Steps Get involved and make your views known: Over the coming months, we will continue working on the EA for a new landfill footprint at the existing Ottawa WMF. There are many opportunities for you to get involved in the process and make your views known. When you sign-in to any WCEC EA consultation event, please include your address if you wish to receive further information. Please try and attend future Open Houses, Workshops, and Technical Sessions. Meet with us individually or in groups to ask questions, express your viewpoints or provide your input. Visit our website to get more information or to provide your comments. 44
Assessment of Landfill Footprint Alternatives West Carleton Environmental Centre. Option #4 Impact on Agriculture
Assessment of Landfill Footprint Alternatives Figure 422 99 Option #4 Impact on Agriculture The net effects with respect to continued service to customers, the optimized site life/ capacity is 65 million
More informationAppendix E. Workshop #2 Summary Report
Appendix E Workshop #2 Summary Report Environment Public Workshop Session #2 Summary Report Prepared by: AECOM 302-1150 Morrison Drive 613 820 8282 tel Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8S9 613 820 8338 fax www.aecom.com
More information6. Net Effects of the Alternative Methods 6-1
Table of Contents 6. 6-1 6.1 Net Effects Methodology... 6-1 6.1.1 Evaluation Criteria and Indicators... 6-2 6.1.2 Key Design Considerations, Future Baseline Conditions &... 6-2 6.1.3 Maximum Impact / Worst-Case
More informationAppendix B. Commitments made in the Approved Terms of Reference
Appendix B Commitments made in the Approved Terms of Reference Approved Terms of Reference Requirements and How They Were in the 1. The study area considered for the new landfill footprint at the West
More informationWaste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) is pleased to welcome you to Public Open House #2 for the. Twin Creeks Landfill Environmental Screening
Welcome Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WM) is pleased to welcome you to Public Open House #2 for the Please take a few moments to browse the display material and talk to our staff and consultants.
More informationNatural Environment Existing Conditions Terrestrial
Natural Environment Existing Conditions Terrestrial Alternative 1 Significant Woodland in the Southeast and Southwest Woodlots. Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH) in the Southeast and Southwest Woodlots
More informationWaste Management of Canada Limited West Carleton Environmental Center Environmental Assessment (EA) Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) 2013/2014
Waste Management of Canada Limited West Carleton Environmental Center Environmental Assessment (EA) Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) 2013/2014 EA File: 02-08-02 Submitted by: Waste Management of Canada
More informationOttawa-Trussler Area Sewage Facility Class Environmental Assessment
Welcome to the Ottawa-Trussler Area Sewage Facility Class Environmental Assessment Public Open House May 7, 2013 September 25, 2013 Welcome The purpose of this second Public Open House is to: Present the
More informationNoront Ferrochrome Production Facility (FPF) Environmental Issues and Approach. October 2017
Noront Ferrochrome Production Facility (FPF) Environmental Issues and Approach October 2017 (Simulated FPF) INTRODUCTION Noront is proposing to develop a Ferrochrome Production Facility (FPF) in Northern
More informationGUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK
PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT Minerals and Petroleum Development Branch GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK Guide to the
More informationENVIRONMENT ACT TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS. Beaver Bank Bypass
ENVIRONMENT ACT TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS Beaver Bank Bypass Highway 101 to the Beaver Bank Road Halifax County, NS NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
More informationEnvironmental Screening Report Twin Creeks Landfill Proposed Fill Rate Increase. Waste Management of Canada Corporation
Environmental Screening Report Twin Creeks Landfill Proposed Fill Rate Increase Waste Management of Canada Corporation March 2017 Contents Executive Summary... 1 1 Project Description... 2 1.1 Introduction...
More informationIntroduction. They can help ensure that all key issues and elements have been considered; They help ensure that the review process is systematic; and
Introduction There are many tools that a reviewer of environmental impact assessment documents can use to help determine whether such documents are complete and adequate. Among the powerful tools that
More informationRegional Municipality of Halton Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study
Welcome to the Regional Municipality of Halton Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study September 23, 2009 Please Sign In and take an Information Brief
More informationNatural Systems Planning Primer
Natural Systems Planning Primer Lise.Guevremont@ottawa.ca Amy.Macpherson@ottawa.ca Land Use and Natural Systems Unit Planning and Growth Management November 2015 1 Welcome Policy Framework Development
More informationFactor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures
Natural Environment No impacts of provincial significance to the natural environment are anticipated for the rapid transit project. Other impacts and how they will be mitigated are outlined in the table
More information7.0 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES AND IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED SITE
7.0 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES AND IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED SITE As an initial step during the EA, Taggart Miller undertook a comparative Site selection assessment to identify a preferred
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement for the Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project
Environmental Impact Statement for the Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project Prepared for Submitted by 41844.101 March 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SLAVE FALLS TRAMWAY CONVERSION PROJECT
More informationCONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL SITE GUIDELINES
Nova Scotia Environment and Labour CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL SITE GUIDELINES Approval Date: October 24, 1997 Effective Date: October 24, 1997 Approved By: Peter Underwood Version Control:
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationShell Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Shell Canada Limited
SCREENING SCOPING DOCUMENT For the proposed Shell Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project Shell Canada Limited Prepared by: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Natural Resources Canada Fisheries
More informationM E M O R A N D U M 10 June Senior Environmental Officer Ottawa District Office Eastern Region
Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l'environnement P.O. Box 22032 C.P. 22032 Kingston, Ontario Kingston (Ontario) K7M 8S5 K7M 8S5 613/549-4000 or 1-800/267-0974 613/549-4000 ou 1-800/267-0974 Fax:
More informationViridor Waste Management. Proposed Development of an In-Vessel Composting Facility. Land at Exide Batteries, Salford Road, Bolton
Viridor Waste Management Proposed Development of an In-Vessel Composting Facility Land at Exide Batteries, Salford Road, Bolton Non-Technical Summary January 2009 Introduction Viridor Waste Management
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ATMOSPHERIC LANDFILL GAS (VOC) DETAILED IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared
More informationWATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 201 The Maitland Valley Conservation Authority has prepared this report card as a summary on the state of our forests, wetlands, surface water, and ground water resources.
More informationPreferred Elevated Tank Site
Preferred Elevated Tank Site Preferred Site No. 3 is on private property owned by Hopewell Developments. Approximately 5 acres of land will be required, including lands required for a permanent access
More informationPublic Information Centre No. 2
Public Information Centre No. 2 Wednesday April 20, 2011 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm City of Welland City Hall Area 2 Welland, Pelham, and Port Colborne Welcome to Public Information Centre No. 2 Please sign in
More informationEnvironmental Screening Form and EMMP Template USAID West Africa Regional Regulation 216 Workshop: Ghana USAID/GEMS JANUARY, 2017
Environmental Screening Form and EMMP Template USAID West Africa Regional Regulation 216 Workshop: Ghana USAID/GEMS JANUARY, 2017 This document contains two tools to be used for an exercise in which workshop
More informationInformation Requirements Table for Liquid Waste
Applicant Summary Tracking # Authorization # Applicant / Facility Name Ministry of Environment Prepared by: Title Date The Information Requirements Table (IRT) for Liquid Waste is a tool used by Ministry
More informationFebruary Reference Section in Supplemental. Reference Section in Consultants Reports. Reference Section in Application. TOR No.
Request i Final Terms of Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Coal Valley Resources Inc. (CVRI) Proposed Robb Trend Project Cross (Concordance) Table to Location in ii PURPOSE OF THE TERMS OF REFERENCE
More informationAPPENDIX 2. Nova Scotia Department of Environment and Labour Environmental Assessment Terms and Conditions for Environmental Assessment Approval
APPENDIX 2 Nova Scotia Department of Environment and Labour Terms and Conditions for Approval Approval Approval Date: March 14, 2007 Keltic Petrochemicals Inc. LNG and Petrochemical Plant Facilities Keltic
More informationGRAND NIAGARA Proposed Secondary Plan
GRAND NIAGARA Proposed Secondary Plan Public Open House #3 January 17. 2017 scope + process BUILT Grand Niagara Secondary Plan The Grand Niagara Secondary Plan will establish a framework for the future
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS... 4.17-1 4.17.0 Introduction... 4.17-1 4.17.1 Methodology... 4.17-2 4.17.2 Existing Conditions... 4.17-2 4.17.3 Impacts... 4.17-4 4.17.4 Applicant-Proposed
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED CAPITAL REGION RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE VOLUME I
Wilson-Johnston Municipal Drain: The post-development, final build-out sub-catchment area draining to the Wilson-Johnston Drain will decrease by approximately 11.5 hectares, from 95.1 hectares to 83.6
More informationDesign and Operation of Landfills
Design and Operation of Landfills Soils and hydrogeology Site selection criteria Site layout and landfill operations Liner design Water balance Biological reactions in landfills Leachate quality Gas production
More informationThe following potential environmental receptors and impacts form the basis of TRCA s review under Ontario Regulation 166/06 and the Fisheries Act:
TRCA Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Dewatering September 2013 Rationale: The Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for
More informationCass County Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Program
Cass County Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Program Both residents and visitors of Cass County enjoy the beauty of over 250 lakes and ponds, along with numerous streams, creeks, and wetlands that
More informationWELCOME! Please sign in so we can keep you updated on the study
The City of Peterborough Chemong Road/Reid Street Widening Class Environmental Assessment (Schedule C) Public Information Centre #2 March 20, 2012 Northminster United Church WELCOME! Please sign in so
More informationDivision 8 Intensive Animal Husbandry Code
Division 8 Intensive Animal Husbry Code 12.8.1 Intensive Animal Husbry Code (1) The provisions in this division comprise the Intensive Animal Husbry Code. (2) They are compliance with the Intensive Animal
More informationTOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER MIDHURST - WATER, WASTEWATER & TRANSPORTATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PHASE 3 & 4. January 7, 2015 Education Meeting
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER MIDHURST - WATER, WASTEWATER & TRANSPORTATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PHASE 3 & 4 January 7, 2015 Education Meeting 1 Overview of Presentation Overview of the Class Environmental
More informationCLC Meeting 23 November 23, 2016 FACILITY CHARACTERISTICS, CLIMATE CHANGE & PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
CLC Meeting 23 November 23, 2016 FACILITY CHARACTERISTICS, CLIMATE CHANGE & PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS 1 Agenda 1. Preliminary Facility Characteristics 2. Climate Change Assumptions 3. Preliminary Planning Assumptions
More informationTES Industrial Development SW ¼ SEC Lacombe County Outline Plan
TES Industrial Development Lacombe County Outline Plan 112849297 June 2012 am v:\1128\active\112849297\07_reports_studies\rpt_tes_20120508.doc i Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 PURPOSE... 1
More informationThis summary and the Report subsequently inform the recommended mitigation contained in Section 28 and will inform the Project conditions.
18. Air The Project Air quality team prepared an Air Quality Assessment Report for the Project, which is included in Volume 3 (Part 1). The Report provides an assessment of air quality effects associated
More informationAnnex F Scoping Checklist
Scoping Checklist Table F1: Scoping Checklist Table. Questions to be considered in Scoping /? Which Characteristics of the Project 1. Will construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involve
More information5 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. The scope of the EIA falls under three broad categories:
5 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 5.1 INTRODUCTION The scope of the EIA falls under three broad categories: technical scope; spatial scope; and temporal scope. The scoping process for the
More informationDREHID MECHANICAL BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT FACILITY WASTE LICENCE APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS JUNE 2012
DREHID MECHANICAL BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT FACILITY WASTE LICENCE APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS JUNE 2012 TOBIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS ATTACHMENTS TO WASTE LICENCE APPLICATION Prepared on behalf of: Bord na Móna Plc.
More informationProject Description Report
Project Description Report Project Description Report St. Catharines Glendale Avenue Plant Renewable Biogas Cogeneration Project 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this draft Project Description
More informationPROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED HORIZON NORTH PIT EXTENSION PROJECT
PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED HORIZON NORTH PIT EXTENSION PROJECT Approximately 70 km North of Fort McMurray, Alberta ISSUED
More informationEnvironmental Assessment Matrix
For FCC Use Only Date: Customer Name: Environmental Assessment Matrix Loan Number: Please complete each question. Some answers may require additional information. Attach additional documentation where
More informationLeaside to Main Infrastructure Refurbishment Project Strengthening the transmission system in your neighbourhood
Leaside to Main Infrastructure Refurbishment Project Strengthening the transmission system in your neighbourhood Purpose of this Public Information Centre Provide you with an update on Hydro One s infrastructure
More informationWaste Management, a Role for Surveyors - Linking the Environment and Planning
Waste Management, a Role for Surveyors - Linking the Environment and Planning John R PARKER, Australia Key words: Waste management, environment, planning, extractive industry, recycling, landfill SUMMARY
More informationCity Development Plan Variation No. 7 Marina Park - Pairc Ui Chaoimh
City Development Plan Variation No. 7 Marina Park - Pairc Ui Chaoimh Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Screening Report 25 th November 2011 Cork City Council Comhairle Cathrach Chorcaí Proposed
More informationGENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN WATERBODIES AND ON WATERBODY BANKS
ONTARIO PROVINCIAL STANDARD SPECIFICATION METRIC OPSS.PROV 182 NOVEMBER 2012 GENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN WATERBODIES AND ON WATERBODY BANKS TABLE OF CONTENTS
More information(1) Site Suitability PURPOSE
3.3 Code for Development and Use of Rural Service Industries PURPOSE This purpose of this code is to encourage the development and use of suitable rural service industries on rural, industrial or suitable
More informationGray s Creek. Gray s Creek
Gray s Creek 1 Grades F + Forest Conditions B Wetland Conditions C - Surface Water Quality This Watershed Report Card outlines the environmental information for the Gray s Creek watershed as of 2017. The
More informationENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN. Environment Protection Authority, ACT May 2009
ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN Environment Protection Authority, ACT May 2009 ISBN-13: 978-0-642-60494-1 ISBN-10: 0-642-60494-0 Australian Capital Territory,
More information3. SHIRLEY S BROOK / WATTS CREEK SUBWATERSHED STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
3. SHIRLEY S BROOK / WATTS CREEK SUBWATERSHED STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council endorse the Shirley s Brook/Watts Creek Subwatershed Study (September 1999) as the technical document to guide
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Town of Shelburne Long-Term Well for Additional Water Supply Project
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Town of Shelburne Long-Term Well for Additional Water Supply Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Project Summary In order to accommodate future growth
More informationWELCOME. Please sign in Representatives are available to answer questions Please complete a comment sheet
WELCOME Please sign in Representatives are available to answer questions Please complete a comment sheet Place it in the box or send it to the Consultant undertaking the study or to the Town of Wasaga
More informationDESIGN BULLETIN #16/2003 (Revised July 2007) Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas.
Drainage Guidelines for Highways Under Provincial Jurisdiction in Urban Areas. July 2007 Update to Design Bulletin #16/2003: Added under Design Criteria Culverts of 600mm diameter are commonly used to
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. Identification of the sources of pollution and assessing the impacts on the environment due to proposed project if any;
TERMS OF REFERENCE 1.0 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK FOR EIA STUDY The components of the EIA study include: Determination of baseline data using primary data generation and secondary data available from various
More informationNorthern Frontier Northern Homeland
Northern Frontier Northern Homeland THE REPORT OF THE MACKENZIE VALLEY PIPELINE INQUIRY Volume Two Terms and Conditions Mr. Justice THOMAS R. BERGER ii NORTHERN FRONTIER, NORTHERN HOMELAND - Mackenzie
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY In the Matter of the Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Remer Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion FINDINGS
More informationTechnical Guidance Document for Operational Environmental Management Plan (OEMP)
Technical Guidance Document for Operational Environmental Management Plan (OEMP) EAD-EQ-PCE-TG-06 Signature on Original Environment Quality Sector * Corporate Management Representative Secretary General
More information407 TRANSITWAY. Planning & Preliminary Design
FROM EAST OF HIGHWAY 400 TO KENNEDY ROAD GWP #252-96-00 Public Information Centre #2 June 24 th and 29 th, 2010 Purpose of Public Information Centre #2 The first Public Information Centre (PIC #1) was
More informationThe Don River and Central Waterfront are among the most degraded waterways in the City of Toronto.
This document was put together following the fourth round of public consultation for the Class Environmental Assessment study for this Project. In June 2011, the Project Team consulted with stakeholders
More informationTechnical Rules: Assessment Report. Clean Water Act, 2006
Technical Rules: Assessment Report Clean Water Act, 2006 November 20, 2008 Amended on: December 12, 2008 (administrative amendments) November 16, 2009 (EBR Posting Number EBRO10-7573) Clean Water Act,
More informationQuestionnaire (Conventional Energy)
Questionnaire (Conventional Energy) QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CONVENTIONAL ENERGY (SECTOR-RELATED QUESTIONS) The completion of this questionnaire is voluntary. However, replying to the relevant questions as completely
More informationChapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw
Chapter 21 Stormwater Management Bylaw SECTION 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Bylaw is to: implement the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm
More informationExcerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants
Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants The following is an excerpt of the Thermal Power guidelines for New Plants, a complete version of which is found in the Pollution Prevention and Abatement
More informationClifton Marsh Landfill Variation of planning permission 05/09/0376 & 06/09/0395 for the continuation of landfilling until Non Technical Summary
Clifton Marsh Landfill Variation of planning permission 05/09/0376 & 06/09/0395 for the continuation of landfilling until 2035 Non Technical Summary SLR Consulting Limited Project Ref: 403.00079.00474
More informationSABI Code of Practice for On-farm Irrigation Design
SABI Code of Practice for On-farm Irrigation Design This code was developed to provide guidelines for irrigators and those servicing irrigators on developing a new irrigation system or upgrading an existing
More informationRegional District of Okanagan-Similkameen 101 Martin Street Penticton, BC V2A 5J9. November 2008 Project No
Sawmill Road Area Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen 101 Martin Street Penticton, BC V2A 5J9 November 2008 Project No. 104258 Table of Contents SECTION TITLE PAGE
More informationEnvironmental Checklist:. 10.Ports and Harbors (1) Yes: Y No: N (a) (b) (c) (d)
Checklist:. 10.Ports and Harbors (1) 1 Permits and Explanation 2 Pollution Control (1) EIA and Permits (2) Explanation to the Local Stakeholders (3) Examination of Alternatives (1) Air Quality (2) Water
More informationState Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project
OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MEETING Celebration Church 688 Dan Street, Akron, Ohio Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project Existing Bridge Future Bridges: Steel
More informationE5. On-site and small scale wastewater treatment and disposal
E5. On-site and small scale wastewater treatment and disposal E5.1. Background On-site wastewater systems are utilised for residential dwellings, commercial and industrial activities and facilities not
More informationComprehensive Study Scoping Document. for Lower Mattagami Hydroelectric Complex Redevelopment CEAR Reference Number:
Comprehensive Study Scoping Document for Lower Mattagami Hydroelectric Complex Redevelopment CEAR Reference Number: 07-03-26302 Prepared pursuant to Subsection 21(1) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION. Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINING AND RECLAMATION DOCUMENT NUMBER: 563-2113-660 TITLE: Coal Refuse Disposal - Site Selection EFFECTIVE DATE: February 8, 1999 AUTHORITY: The Coal Refuse
More informationAirport Road from 1 km North of Mayfield Road to 0.6 km North of King Street Public Information Centre #1
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Airport Road from 1 km North of Mayfield Road to 0.6 km North of King Street Public Information Centre #1 Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013 Time: 6:30 p.m. 8:30 p.m.
More informationMarlow Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary. Final. WNGLDC Environment Agency Title
Marlow Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Final WNGLDC Environment Agency Title We are The Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it
More informationGuide to Content for Energy Project Applications
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Guide to Content for Energy Project Applications March 29, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 General Instructions... 7 Part 1: New Plants and Facilities...
More informationSizewell B Dry Fuel Store. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Sizewell B Dry Fuel Store Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION This Non Technical Summary (NTS) is submitted as part of the application to extend the existing
More informationMURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT
The RVCA produces individual reports for 16 catchments in the Lower Rideau subwatershed. Using data collected and analysed by the RVCA through its watershed monitoring and land cover classification programs,
More informationMaster Environmental Servicing Plan and Secondary Plan
East Side Lands Stage 2 Master Environmental Servicing Plan and Secondary Plan Public Consultation Centre (PCC) December 5, 2016 Today s Agenda 6:00 pm 6:30 pm: Open House 6:30 pm 7:00 pm: Presentation
More informationDraft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements
JUNE 2016 RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. IN
More informationPOINTE DU BOIS MODERNIZATION PROJECT
POINTE DU BOIS MODERNIZATION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF NEW FACILITIES AT PRESENT SITE AND DECOMMISSIONING OF EXISTING FACILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT SCOPING DOCUMENT Submitted By Manitoba Hydro
More informationPortbury Dock Renewable Energy Plant. Cumulative Impact Assessment Non-Technical Summary September 2009
Portbury Dock Renewable Energy Plant Cumulative Impact Assessment Non-Technical Summary September 2009 INTRODUCTION On 28 th August 2009 E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Developments Limited (EC&R) submitted
More informationCMPDI. 4.6 Mine Closure Plan
4.6 Mine Closure Plan Post-mining Land Use Planning The mine closure planning with regard to for Lekhapani OCP will broadly involve the following aspects: 1. Technical Aspects 2 Environmental Aspects 2.
More informationMaitland Valley WATERSHED
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 2018 Maitland Conservation has prepared this report card as a summary of the state of your forests, wetlands, and water resources. WHERE ARE WE? We are one of 36 Conservation
More informationWEAO STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION 2018 PROJECT STATEMENT
Water Environment Association of Ontario Young Professionals Committee and Student Design Competition Sub- Committee and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change In Collaboration with
More informationKENT BREEZE WIND FARMS
Decommissioning Plan Report MAY 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS DESCRIPTION... 2 3. SITE RESTORATION... 3 4. EXCESS MATERIALS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT... 4 5. MANAGING
More informationMinistry of the Environment and Climate Change. Transfer of Review. Presentation for Wastewater Practitioners Group.
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Transfer of Review Presentation for Wastewater Practitioners Group November 29, 2017 Outline of Presentation Transfer of Review (TOR) Program Context TOR
More informationE. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Existing Conditions The Project Site is located within the Lower Hudson Watershed. According to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Lower Hudson
More informationOFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF MAGNETAWAN
OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPALITY OF MAGNETAWAN Prepared by July 24, 2002 May 16, 2005 and June 14, 2005 With Jim s Notes on Modifications Modifications provided by MMAH on May 10, 2005 and June 8, 2005
More informationWelcome. Public Information Event. Dufferin Sanitary Trunk Sewer (STS) System Improvements Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study
Welcome Public Information Event Dufferin Sanitary Trunk Sewer (STS) System Improvements Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study Please sign in to be added to the study mailing list and receive
More informationCONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT ENACTMENT 1996 CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT (PRESCRIBED ACTIVITIES) ORDER 1999
(No. JPBN. 1509/27 Vol. II CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT ENACTMENT 1996 CONSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT (PRESCRIBED ACTIVITIES) ORDER 1999 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5 of the Conservation
More informationESIA for the proposed Baynes Hydropower Project:
ESIA for the proposed Baynes Hydropower Project: Public Scoping Meeting: Windhoek Special Arrangements Visitors from Kunene Region Liaison Officer will translate for them. Meeting filmed. Microphones to
More informationCLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE PLAN JAMES RIVER POWER STATION UTILITY WASTE LANDFILL CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE PLAN JAMES RIVER POWER STATION UTILITY WASTE LANDFILL CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI INITIAL PREPARATION DATE: October 11, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CERTIFICATION
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES Version 1 September, 2012 Section 1 Environmental Impact Study Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS What is an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) and What is its Purpose?.....................................
More informationFINAL SCOPING DOCUMENT
State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) FINAL SCOPING DOCUMENT HR Ventures Subdivision Town of Shawangunk, Ulster County, NY Draft Environmental Impact Statement SEQR CLASSIFICATION: UNLISTED ACTION
More information