Balancing Power grid and Gas grid

Transcription

1 Balancing Power grid and Gas grid S. Walspurger November 2012 ECN-L

2 Balancing Power grid and Gas grid Energy Delta Convention 2012 Gas powers Stéphane Walspurger Groningen

3 Changing energy landscape Future energy mix relies less on depleting fossil fuels In conventional power gas is favored due to relative lower carbon footprint. Renewable power from intermittent sources such as wind and solar penetrates significantly the electricity market Due to lower capacity factors, installed capacity is high from IEA ETP 2012

4 Current German electricity mix Q1/Q % of e-production is from renewables May-June GW peak solar electricity production 14,7 TWh solar power in 6 months (JAN->JUN)

5 Success of renewables creates new issues Fluctuations difficult to predict and not controllable Not all green power can be fed into the grid Power grid does not store power. Load need to be smartly managed.

6 Part of the solution Maintain a sufficient efficient fossil fired power plant fleet Adapt conventional power plants for high load shift Optimize shut down/start-up procedure Fübi et al. VGB Power, 3, 2012, p30

7 But Load, capacity and efficiency Shut down/start-up of power plants is costly Operating at low load is inefficient and costly Power carbon footprint increases As a consequence investment in new power plant are unattractive currently, but remain necessary to cope with highly fluctuating loads. IEA calls for use of highest efficiency technologies such as NGCC or supercritical coal combustion plants to achieve higher efficiencies than 45% (net LHV basis) operating with capacity factor of more than 85%. Fübi et al. VGB Power, 3, 2012, p30

8 Power production Towards storing the excess power from renewables Installed capacity intermettent renewables Use of excess power Grid capacity Demand Conventional fossil based and non intermettent renewables Availabilty hours per year Adapted from DVGW, Jurgen Lenz

9 Discharge time Storage technologies month Gas storage day hour minute batteries CAES Pumped hydro second kw MW GW TW PW Rated Capacity Adapted from IEA ETP 2012 and Zentrum für Sonnenenergie und Waterstoff

10 Storage capacity in Europe Key facts Bergermeer Gas storage Working gas volume 46TWh ( m 3 ) Injection capacity Withdrawal capacity Netherland Gas consumption equivalent 0.47TWh per day ( m 3 ) 0.64TWh per day ( m 3 ) +/- 15 days Source: Gas Infrastructure Europe

11 Power to Gas routes Power to Hydrogen by electrolysis Pros Direct conversion (electrolysis) No carbon Cons Storage Distribution Load Flexibilty Power to Substitute Natural Gas by electrolysis + methanation Pros Existing infrastructure Cons Multistep process (efficiency) CO 2 utilisation Energy density

12 Power to Gas key advantages Gas injection during high power production Controllable withdrawal and use in conventional NGCC Security of supply Flexible fuel: For power production For heat production For domestic fuel For transportation.

13 Electrolysis technologies Classical alkaline electrolyzers Low temperature Commercially available up to 100 MW scale Operation at higher pressure possible 70-75% efficiency at high load. PEM electrolyzers Low temperature Commercially available up to 100MW Operation at higher pressure possible Low load operation possible High temperature electrolyzers High tenperature ( C) Higher efficiency (heat use)

14 Energy Delta Gas Research Project Synthetic Methane

15 Challenges in HT electrolysis Electric mode: SOE-E Fuel assisted mode SOE-fuel Cell development for reversible normal/fuel assisted operations Modelling and efficiency assessment at full/part load Stack configuration design Integration in full conversion chain Power to Gas

16 Sabatier reaction CO 2 + H 2 CO + H 2 O CO + 3H 2 CH 4 + H 2 O CO 2 + 4H 2 CH H 2 O Reverse WGS Methanation Sabatier reaction Flexible process (good part load, fast response) Very exothermic -164 kj/mol Paul Sabatier ( ) Nobel Laureate in Chemistry 1912

17 Issues SOE SOE characterisation, modeling and development Methanation Feedstock quality (CO 2, biogas, producer gas) Gas cleaning Unit operation development Process design Chain and market aspects (Hanze, ECN, TUD) Chain efficiency Preferred configurations Market opportunities End User

18 Biogas CO 2 from capture plants P- GRID Large Surplus Electricity Production Electricity from Renewable e Electricity from Fossil Fuels Solar Wind Hydro Solid Oxide Electrolyzer H 2 SNG plant CO 2 Capture Storage Conversion electricity to CH 4 O 2 Heat H 2 O P2G CO 2 Re-Use 0.6 CH CO 2 H 2 O Heat Bio-Syngas CH 4 + CO + CO 2 + H 2 CH 4 Gas Storage G- GRID Combined Heat Power

19 CO 2 from capture plants Bio-Syngas And/or Biogas P- GRID Small Surplus Electricity Production Electricity from Renewable e Electricity from Fossil Fuels Solar Wind Hydro Bio-Syngas And/or Biogas Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Fuel assisted electrolysis CO 2 Capture Storage Conversion electricity to CH 4 CO 2 + H 2 O H 2 O P2G H 2 CO 2 Re-Use SNG plant H 2 O Heat CH 4 Gas Storage G- GRID Combined Heat Power

20 CO2 SNG from CO2 E electrolysis H2 Methanation SNG 1000 MWe 710 MW th electrolysis Full/part load operation Switch on/off procedure resistance/idle operation Scale Methanation CO 2 purity SNG product specs Part load response 570 MW th 1 Mton CO % storage Rather than No storage

21 Biogas case Base case Productivity 100 Efficiency 90-95% Large surplus case Productivity 160 Efficiency 70-75%

22 Going further with Biogas Small surplus electricity Productivity 82 Efficiency 70% Towards continuous production: Mixed Configurations Large surplus / small surplus Robust gas cleaning strategy Methanation Process design and integration

23 Outlook There will be a business case for power to gas in which it pays off to turn excess renewable electricity into SNG Case configuration and techno economics Robust reversible electrolyzer Innovation and flexibilization of SNG train SNG quality for end-user specs

24 Project participants P.V. Aravind W. Haije M. Barankin T. Woudstra S. Walspurger W. van Gemert G. Botta M. Saric J.W. Dijkstra L. Rabou ECN Westerduinweg 3 P.O. Box LE Petten 1755 ZG Petten The Netherlands The Netherlands T F info@ecn.nl

25 Thanks for your attention

26 ECN Westerduinweg 3 P.O. Box LE Petten 1755 LG Petten The Netherlands The Netherlands T F info@ ecn.nl 8