Building Energy Next Generation Policy International Facility Managers Association October 1, Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment

Transcription

1 Building Energy Next Generation Policy International Facility Managers Association October 1, 2015 Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment

2 CAP Emission Reduction Goals

3 CAP Building Goals

4 PROGRESS TO DATE Energy & GHG Reductions Building Energy Use ( ) Target Reduction: 1.25% / year Actual : 0.75% / year GHG Intensity of Fuels ( ) Target Reduction: 1.5% / year Actual : 1.75% / year Overall Building Emissions ( ) Target Reduction: 2% / year Source: 2012 Seattle Community GHG Inventory Actual : 2.50% / year

5 PROGRESS TO DATE Energy Reductions Commercial Building Energy Use ( ) Target Reduction: 1.10% / year Actual : 0.25% / year Residential Building Energy Use ( ) Target Reduction: 1.5% / year Actual : 1.25% / year Source: 2012 Seattle Community GHG Inventory

6 BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS Seattle Building Energy Benchmarking Analysis Report 2013 Data (Sept. 2015)

7 BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS Seattle Building Energy Benchmarking Analysis Report 2013 Data (Sept. 2015)

8 CAP STRATEGY FOR BUILDINGS

9 WORK TO DATE: CAP 2015 ACTIONS Commercial & Multifamily Buildings LEADERSHIP (City Facilities) Develop Resource Conservation Management Plan Publish City energy benchmarking scores INCENTIVES Pilot retro-commissioning incentives Pilot pay for performance incentives Update Living Building pilot REGULATIONS Minimum energy requirements for substantial alterations Increase efficiency standards in each code cycle Outcome-based code option

10 NEXT STEPS IN CLIMATE ACTION Policy Legislation this Fall/Winter Energy Benchmarking Transparency Periodic Tune-Ups for Large Commercial Buildings Additional Supporting City Actions Energy & GHG Goals by Building Type Benchmarking Performance Scorecards SCL Incentives DPD Energy Code Continued Investigation of Additional Actions

11 TIMELINE 2015 Legislation Legislation Submitted Oct. 9 th Introduced to City Council Nov. 16 th Considered at Planning Land Use & Sustainability Committee Dec. 1 st Considered at Full Council Dec. 7 th Director s Rules Spring 2016 Residential Buildings Policy Development Publication of 2015 Building Energy Data Fall 2016 Reporting for First Round of Tune-ups 2018 Evaluation of 2020 performance results

12 BENCHMARKING TRANSPARENCY Why Transparency? Building owners benchmark and make more informed decisions Policy makers use data to inform planning The market uses data to compare performance and reward efficiency

13 BENCHMARKING TRANSPARENCY Why Transparency? City New York City Program Components Benchmarking & Transparency Audits (2013) Lighting Upgrades (2025) Energy Savings for Benchmarked Buildings 5.7% (over 3 years) 9.9% carbon savings Washington, D.C. 2 Benchmarking & Transparency 6% (over 2 years) Seattle Benchmarking 0.6% (over 2 years) 1. US Department of Energy. New York City Benchmarking and Transparency Policy Impact Evaluation Report, May (p. ii) 2. District Department of the Environment. Green Building Report for the District of Columbia, (pp ). Note that reporting and disclosure for all 3 years occurred together in Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment. Building Energy Analysis Report (Executive Summary)

14 BENCHMARKING TRANSPARENCY Key Elements of Legislation Benchmarking energy and GHG information available on web Transparency would start with 2015 data, reported in 2016 No change to owner submittal requirements

15 BUILDING TUNE-UPS Why Tune-Ups? Ensure energy and water are not needlessly wasted by optimizing building performance Promote active management of building systems Tune-ups yield 5-20% energy savings and pay back in 2-3 years, on average

16 BUILDING TUNE-UPS Key Elements of Legislation Non-residential buildings 50,000 sq. ft. Tune up every 5 years Focused on operational improvements Phased in by building size, beginning 2018 Exemptions for evidence of good performance

17 Phase In Strategy 200,000 sf or larger , ,000 sf ,000 99,000 sf ,000 69,000 sf 2021 BUILDING TUNE-UPS Discussion Questions Question: How long does it take to budget, plan for, and conduct a building tune-up in your organization?

18 BUILDING TUNE-UPS Discussion Questions Scoping a Tune-up vs. Retro-commissioning Shaping policy to on average save 10-15% energy, and pay back in 2-3 years. Question: What do you feel are the low-hanging fruit and most economical measures? What is your experience with the cost of a building assessment and implementation of low/no-cost measures?

19 BUILDING TUNE-UPS Discussion Questions Additional questions: What type of support would be most helpful to facilities managers in implementing this policy? (e.g. incentives, training, etc.) Issues with lease agreements or access to tenant spaces that make this challenging? Other input and perspectives?