Legend FIGURE 2 ENLOW FORK RESTORATION SITE. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY MAP DtF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA REFERENCE

Transcription

1 Fa DtD WeD WeD CaB WeC WeC DtD WeD WeD CaB CaB 5 Feet.5.1 FIGURE 2 ENLOW FORK RESTORATION SITE CaB ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY MAP WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Document Path: Y:\84\33362-RES_2WAS2_Carpent\GIS\Wetland Delineation\JD Package Maps\Figure 2- Enlow Fork MB- EIM.mxd 25 Miles DtD WeD CaB CaB PUBHh DtD DoB CaB WeC WeC Fa DtD CaB DtD Legend CaB DoC REFERENCE CaB J/N: Date: 6/3/13 Revised: 6/5/13 Nw WeD DtD WeD Project Limits- 49 Acres Washington County Streams Hydric Soils Non-HydricHuSoils Washington W County Wetlands No wetlands located within the site area. Soils data from National Resources Conservation Service. Stream data from PA Dept. of Environmental Protection. Aerial imagery from Bing Maps-211. Study limits are approximate.

2 AA-2 AA-1 AA-3 AA-5 X-5 X-4 X-7 X-2 X-9 X-12 X-11 Y-7 Y-6 Y-2 P-1 Y-4 Y-3 P-15 P-8 Q-4 Q-5 Q-1 P-7 Q-3 P-5 P-19 P-2 P-3 P-21 P-23 O-7 P-25 O-1 O-1 N-5 N-8 N-1 M-7 M-8 M-1 L-1 L-8 L-13 L-7 L-5 L-16 L-1 L-3 K-4 K-1 J-1 K-2 J-11 K-12 J-15 J-18 J-5 J-3 J-21 J-1 J-26 J-31 J-29 J-28 G-7 G-5 C-1 G-3 G-1 C-7 F-4 F-3 F-2 A-13 A-11 A-9 C-6 B-8 C-5 A-1 A-3 E-6 E-2 E-1 FIGURE 3 ENLOW FORK RESTORATION SITE FDS 6 FDS 5 S-3 S-4 R-4 R-5 R-6 S-1 A AA AB PRELIMINARY WATERS OF THE U.S. DELINEATION MAP - TOPO WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA R-1 R-7 B C SCALE 1"=4' D AD PENNSYLVANIA 1983 NAD DATUM NORTH 4' 8' AE AF LEGEND E G I F PROJECT LIMITS (49 ACRES XX WETLAND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AG PERENNIAL STREAMS PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO WETLAND AH AI N-4 N-3 N-7 M-4 XX EPHEMERAL STREAMS INTERMITTENT STREAMS WETLAND FLAG PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM WETLAND PALUSTRINE OPEN WATER (POW WETLAND Y:\84\33362-RES_2WAS2_Carpent\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\JD Package\ WETL-WDM No Imagery.dwg Plotted on 8/13/213 8:58 AM by Will Gilrain AJ AK FDS 3 J FDS 4 AL AM OHP X X OHU AN L AP AQ N OHP FDS 7 AO X K M AR X NOTES: XX STREAM SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION 1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PER TIMMONS GROUP SURVEY.

3 FIGURE 4 ENLOW FORK RESTORATION SITE A PRELIMINARY WATERS OF THE U.S. DELINEATION MAP - AERIAL S-3 AA S-4 FDS FDS WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA S-1 R-4 R-5 AB 5 6 R-6 R-1 R-7 B SCALE 1"=4' C D AD Q-4 PENNSYLVANIA 1983 NAD DATUM NORTH Q-3 AF AE 4' 8' Q-5 G Q-1 LEGEND P-1 5 X-4 P-1 AAAA- 5 X-2 X-5 X-12 Y-6 X-7 1 X-11 Y-7 Y-4 X-9 P-19 AA- 2 E P-8 Y-3 AA- 3 P-7 Y-2 P-2 F P-21 P-5 I PROJECT LIMITS (49 ACRES P-2 3 AG XX WETLAND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION P-3 P-25 PERENNIAL STREAMS PALUSTRINE FORESTED (PFO WETLAND O-7 EPHEMERAL STREAMS O-1 O-1 AH INTERMITTENT STREAMS N-4 N-3 N-5 AI XX N-7 N-1 N-8 AJ M-4 XX M-7 M-1 M-8 L-7 PALUSTRINE EMERGENT (PEM WETLAND PALUSTRINE OPEN WATER (POW WETLAND WETLAND FLAG STREAM SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Y:\84\33362-RES_2WAS2_Carpent\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\JD Package\ WETL-WDM.dwg Plotted on 8/13/213 9:1 AM by Will Gilrain L-8 AK L-1 L-5 L-13 L-16 FDS NOTES: 3 L-3 L-1 FDS 1. 4 AM J K-4 J-1 J-11 K-1 K-2 K-12 AL J-5 J-15 J-18 J-3 J-21 J-1 K J-26 J-31 J-29 J-28 G-5 AN G-7 AO G-3 L G-1 F-4 C-1 F-3 C-7 F-2 C-6 AP C-5 AR E-6 E-2 AQ A-1 M A-3 N A-13 B-8 FDS 7 A-9 A-11 E-1 WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS PER TIMMONS GROUP SURVEY.

4 APPENDIX A FIELD DATA SHEETS

5 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington County Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-1 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none: Concave Slope (%: 5 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dormont-Culleoka silt loams NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No This data station is located in an active livestock pasture. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

6 Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A/B Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 OBL species 15 x 1 = 3 1. None FACW species 15 x 2 = 3 FAC species x 3 = FACU species 7 x 4 = 28 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 1 (A 34 (B Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. None Dominance Test is >5% Prevalence Index is 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Festuca pratensis 7 Yes FACU Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and 3 in. Juncus effusus 15 Yes FACW (6 cm or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH. Carex lurida 1 No OBL Polygonum hydropiper 5 No OBL Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and less than 3 in. (6 cm DBH. Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2 ft (1 to 6 m in height All herbaceous (non-woody plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m in height. All woody vines, regardless of height. 1 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 1. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet. US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

7 Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches Color (moist % Color (moist % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks -7 1YR 4/1 9 5YR 4/6 1 C PL SICL YR 4/2 95 5YR 4/6 5 C PL SICL FDS-1 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Histosol (A1 Dark Surface (S7 2 cm Muck (A1 Histic Epipedon (A2 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 Black Histic (A3 Thin Dark Surface (S9 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2 Red Parent Material (TF2 Stratified Layers (A5 Depleted Matrix (F3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12 2 cm Muck (A1 Redox Dark Surface (F6 Other (Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7 Thick Dark Surface (A12 Redox Depressions (F8 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4 Umbric Surface (F13 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6 unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

8 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-2 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none: Convex Slope (%: 1 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Culleoka silt loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No This data station is located in active livestock pasture. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

9 Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 OBL species x 1 = 1. None FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species 8 x 4 = 32 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 8 (A 32 (B Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. None Dominance Test is >5% Prevalence Index is 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Festuca pratensis 5 Yes FACU Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and 3 in. Trifolium repens 3 Yes FACU (6 cm or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH. Cirsium valgare 1 No FACU Plantago major 5 No FACU Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and less Taraxacum officinale 5 No FACU than 3 in. (6 cm DBH. Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2 ft (1 to 6 m in height All herbaceous (non-woody plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m in height. All woody vines, regardless of height. 1 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 1. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet. US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

10 Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches Color (moist % Color (moist % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks -4 1YR 4/2 1 N/A N/A Loam YR 4/3 1 N/A N/A Loam FDS-2 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Histosol (A1 Dark Surface (S7 2 cm Muck (A1 Histic Epipedon (A2 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 Black Histic (A3 Thin Dark Surface (S9 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2 Red Parent Material (TF2 Stratified Layers (A5 Depleted Matrix (F3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12 2 cm Muck (A1 Redox Dark Surface (F6 Other (Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7 Thick Dark Surface (A12 Redox Depressions (F8 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4 Umbric Surface (F13 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6 unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

11 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-3 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none: None Slope (%: 2 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dormont-Culleoka silt loams NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No This data station is located in an active livestock pasture. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: 6" Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: 3" (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

12 Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-3 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A/B Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 OBL species 6 x 1 = 6 1. None FACW species 1 x 2 = 2 FAC species x 3 = FACU species 3 x 4 = 12 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 1 (A 2 (B Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. None Dominance Test is >5% Prevalence Index is 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Carex lurida 6 Yes OBL Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and 3 in. Festuca pratensis 3 Yes FACU (6 cm or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH. Juncus effusus 1 No FACW Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and less than 3 in. (6 cm DBH. Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2 ft (1 to 6 m in height All herbaceous (non-woody plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m in height. All woody vines, regardless of height. 1 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 1. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet. US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

13 Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches Color (moist % Color (moist % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks -14 5Y 4/1 92 5YR 4/6 8 C M SICL FDS 3 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Histosol (A1 Dark Surface (S7 2 cm Muck (A1 Histic Epipedon (A2 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 Black Histic (A3 Thin Dark Surface (S9 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2 Red Parent Material (TF2 Stratified Layers (A5 Depleted Matrix (F3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12 2 cm Muck (A1 Redox Dark Surface (F6 Other (Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7 Thick Dark Surface (A12 Redox Depressions (F8 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4 Umbric Surface (F13 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6 unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

14 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-4 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none: Concave Slope (%: 5 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Culleoka silt loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Peer-Review Draft

15 Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-4 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 OBL species x 1 = 1. None FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species 1 x 4 = 4 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 1 (A 4 (B Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. None Dominance Test is >5% Prevalence Index is 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Festuca pratensis Trifolium repens Yes Yes FACU FACU Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and 3 in. (6 cm or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH. Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and less than 3 in. (6 cm DBH. Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2 ft (1 to 6 m in height All herbaceous (non-woody plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m in height. All woody vines, regardless of height. 1 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 1. None (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Peer-Review Draft

16 Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches Color (moist % Color (moist % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks -2 1YR 4/2 95 5YR4/6 5 C PL Loam YR 4/3 92 5YR 4/6 8 C PL Loam FDS-4 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Histosol (A1 Dark Surface (S7 2 cm Muck (A1 Histic Epipedon (A2 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 Black Histic (A3 Thin Dark Surface (S9 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2 Red Parent Material (TF2 Stratified Layers (A5 Depleted Matrix (F3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12 2 cm Muck (A1 Redox Dark Surface (F6 Other (Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7 Thick Dark Surface (A12 Redox Depressions (F8 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4 Umbric Surface (F13 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6 unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Peer-Review Draft

17 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennyslvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-5 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Toe of slope and floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none: Concave Slope (%: 5 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dormont silt loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No This data station is located in an active livestock pasture. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: 3 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

18 Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FDS-5 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A/B Total % Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 OBL species 25 x 1 = None FACW species 25 x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 5 (A 75 (B Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.5 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. None Dominance Test is >5% Prevalence Index is 1 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Festuca pratensis 4 Yes FACU Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and 3 in. Carex lurida 2 Yes OBL (6 cm or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH. Rumex crispus 15 Yes FACW Boehmeria cylindrica 1 No FACW Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2 ft (6 m or more in height and less Onoclea sensibilis 1 No FACW than 3 in. (6 cm DBH. Polygonum hydropiper 5 No OBL Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2 ft (1 to 6 m in height All herbaceous (non-woody plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m in height. All woody vines, regardless of height. 1 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 1. (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet. US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

19 Sampling Point: Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches Color (moist % Color (moist % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Remarks -12 5Y 5/1 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Silt FDS-5 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Histosol (A1 Dark Surface (S7 2 cm Muck (A1 Histic Epipedon (A2 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 Black Histic (A3 Thin Dark Surface (S9 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2 Red Parent Material (TF2 Stratified Layers (A5 Depleted Matrix (F3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12 2 cm Muck (A1 Redox Dark Surface (F6 Other (Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7 Thick Dark Surface (A12 Redox Depressions (F8 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4 Umbric Surface (F13 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19 wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6 unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft

20 Project/Site: Enlow Fork Restoration Site City/County: Washington Sampling Date: 11/28/12 Applicant/Owner: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC State: PA Sampling Point: FDS-6 Investigator(s: J Bohdan Section, Township, Range: West Finley Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.: Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none: None Slope (%: 15 Lat: N Long: W Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Dormont silt loam NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks. Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No This data station is located in an active livestock pasture. Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply Surface Soil Cracks (B6 Surface Water (A1 True Aquatic Plants (B14 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8 High Water Table (A2 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 Drainage Patterns (B1 Saturation (A3 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3 Moss Trim Lines (B16 Water Marks (B1 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4 Dry-Season Water Table (C2 Sediment Deposits (B2 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6 Crayfish Burrows (C8 Drift Deposits (B3 Thin Muck Surface (C7 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Other (Explain in Remarks Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1 Iron Deposits (B5 Geomorphic Position (D2 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 Shallow Aquitard (D3 Water-Stained Leaves (B9 Microtopographic Relief (D4 Aquatic Fauna (B13 FAC-Neutral Test (D5 Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches: Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches: >14 (includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections, if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Peer-Review Draft