Biomass Burning Contribution to Haze Episode in Winter of Nanjing

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Biomass Burning Contribution to Haze Episode in Winter of Nanjing"

Transcription

1 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment Biomass Burning Contribution to Haze Episode in Winter of Nanjing Liu Xiaoyan

2 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment Outline Introduction Material and method Result and Discussion Conclusion Other work 2

3 3

4 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment

5 Introduction Biomass Burning (BB) what is BB? Biomass burning includes the combustion of biomass fuels through either natural (e.g., wildfires) or planned processes (e.g., prescribed burning and residential wood combustion in fireplaces and wood stoves). Impact: BB emit large amounts of air pollutants, which especially exists in fine particles. Fossil fuel burning has gained attention for about 2 centuries, but scientific interest in biomass burning grew when it had been suggested that for some atmospheric pollutants biomass burning could rival fossil fuel use as a source of atmospheric pollution (Seiler and Crutzen, 1980; Crutzen and Andreae, 1990).The biomass burning contribution to seasonal ambient PM 2.5 mass is much higher in China, that is, 12-27μg m -3 (15-24%) in Beijing (Cheng et al., 2013; Song et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2009), μg m -3 (4-19%) in Guangzhou (Wang et al., 2007), 37% in YRD (70% to OC)(Z. Cheng et al., 2014) It became evident that these emissions could affect large areas of the world as a consequence of long-range transport (Andreae, 1983; Fishman et al., 1990). Tracer: Levoglucosan, K +. 5

6 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment Material and method Sampling site Sampling site Shanxi Road station Distance: 1.7 km

7 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment PM 2.5 Sampling instrument Sampler: KC 1000 Sample collector: quartz filter(8 10 inch) Sampling frequency and time : Time Frequency Notes 14 th Jan 16:30-26 th Jan 18:00 Every 3 hrs Afternoon of 14 th : after light rain Morning of 25 th : light rain 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. of 25 th :power failure 26 th Jan 18:00-29 th Jan 00:00 Every 6 hrs 27 th to 29 th : rain and snow 7

8 Material and method Laborotary analysis of chemical species Chemical species Instrument Principle Carbonaceous component Sunset EC/OC analyzer TOT Water-soluble ion ICS Ion Chromatography + Conductive Detector Carbohydrate ICS Ion Chromatography + Electrochemical Detector Cation Anion Carbohydrate Column IonPac CS12A IonPac CG 12A IonPac AS11-HC IonPac AG11-HC MA Loop 25μL 25μL 200μL Elution Method Flow:1mL min -1 MSA:0-20min 30mM L -1 Flow:1.5mL min -1 NaOH:0-3min 0.5mM L -1,3-5min 0.5-5mM L -1, 5-15min 5-30mM L -1, min 0.5mM L -1 Flow:0.4mL min -1 NaOH:-15-34min 300mM L -1, 34-45min 480mM L -1, 45-60min mM L -1 8

9 Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment QAQC Cation Cal.Type Points Offset Slope Coeff.Det. RSD LOD % % ppb glycerol Lin threitol Lin xylitol Lin levoglucosan Lin arabitol Lin mannanson Lin mannitol Lin galctosan Lin mannose Lin glucose Lin galactose Lin fructose Lin

10 QAQC Cation Cal.Type Points Offset Slope Coeff.Det. RSD recovery LOD % % % ppb Na+ LOff NH4+ Quad K+ LOff Mg2+ LOff Ca2+ LOff F- LOff MSA- LOff Cl- LOff NO2- LOff NO3- LOff SO42- LOff Na NH4 CE K 2Mg Ca 40 2 Cl 2 SO AE NO3 62 MSA F 19 NO

11 Result and Discussion OC EC SOC OC/EC SOC/OC (μg m-3) min max average 11

12 Table 3. The max, min and average value of inorganic ion in PM 2.5 and its ratio to PM 2.5.Ion in μg m -3 Figure 5. Concentration distribution of inorganic ion. The box represent the 25th (lower line),50th (middle line), 75th (top line) percentiles; the end of the vertical bars represent the 10th (below the box) and 90th (above the box) percentiles.the solid dots and stars represent abnormal value. Average SD Max Min (μg m -3 ) Na NH K Mg Ca F MSA Cl NO NO SO

13 Total carbohydrate level in this study is higher than the mean level in urban area of Shanghai(503.7 ng m -3 ) and Guangzhou(206.0 ng m -3 )during winter time(ma et al., 2009, Du et al., 2015) average SD max min ng m -3 levoglucosan mannanson galactosan total anhydrasugar mannose airborne fungal spores glucose galactose fructose pollen, fruit, debritus wood combustion, emitted as uncombusted material glucose: fresh leaf surfaces, pollen,spores,fungi,soil biomass burning total sugar threitol xylitol arabitol mannitol total sugar alcohol total carbohydrate 13

14 Total carbohydrate to OC ratio ranges from 0.54% to 5.31%,with a mean value of 2.86% which is higher than that of urban area in Shanghai during winter(x. Li et al., 2016). Levoglucosan is the most dominant component in total carbohydrate with a portion of 63%, indicating the significant contribution of biomass burning. Levoglucosan to OC ratio varies from 0.08% to 3.99%,with a mean level of 1.81%. 14

15 Good correlationship between levoglucosan and K + or OC suggested the important contribution of biomass burning. Above mean amount of levoglucosan Below mean amount of levoglucosan Second Ion: 88.28% Second Ion: 85.39% 15

16 Total carbohydrate to OC ratio ranges from 0.54% to 5.31%,with a mean value of 2.86% which is higher than that of urban area in Shanghai during winter(x. Li et al., 2016). Levoglucosan is the most dominant component in total carbohydrate with a portion of 63%, indicating the significant contribution of biomass burning. Levoglucosan to OC ratio varies from 0.08% to 3.99%,with a mean level of 1.81%. 16

17 Hysplit 17

18 levoglucosan/k + levoglucosan/mannosan average 0.32± ±1.34 max min (Y. Cheng et al., 2013) K + /OC average 0.06 ± 0.01 max 0.11 min 0.01 Savanna burning emissions during their flaming phase K + /OC: by Cachier et al. (1991), (1995,)Echalar et al. (1995), Maenhaut et al. (1996). K/OC ratio for agricultural residues burning: by Andreae and Merlet (2001) 18

19 PCA 旋转成份矩阵 a 成份 Factor 1: Biomass burning, fossil fuel burning Factor 2: Soil dust Factor 3: Marine emission OC EC Na NH K Mg Ca F MSA Cl NO NO SO levoglucosan 提取方法 : 主成分分析法 旋转法 : 具有 Kaiser 标准化的正交旋转法 a. 旋转在 4 次迭代后收敛 BB to OC_ K + BB to OC_lev average 72.99% 53.85% min 10.75% 2.39% max 99.02% 98.06% % 19

20 Conclusion OC, EC mean concentration is and 2.35 μg m -3,with a mean OC/EC of in the ambient environment during this winter time pollution event in Nanjing. The good relationship between OC and EC indicates the important contribution of fuel combustion. The total carbohydrate concentration is ng m -3, including levoglucosan (375.6 ng m -3 ) as its dominant component, with a high levglucosan/oc (1.81) illustrating the significant contribution of biomass burning to OC, which is estimited as 53.89%. It is identified that Nanjing has been influenced by open biomass burning in southeast China, through air mass long-range transport. Through PCA, main sources of emission are devided to biomass burning, fossil fuel burning, soil dust and marine emission. 20

21 Nepal_PM 10 21

22 Thailand The 10 sugars concentrations (ng/m 3 ) on PM 2.5 in BB and NBB Biomass burning Non-biomass burning Research Institute for Health Sciences (RIHES), Chiang Mai University (CMU) 22

23 The ratio of any sugars in total sugars on PM 2.5 in BB Research Institute for Health Sciences (RIHES), Chiang Mai University (CMU) 23

24 Outlook Looking for method to quantify contribution of biomass burning better. Investigate research method for various kinds of carbohydrates. Continue to improve seperation method for more sorts of target carbohydrate. 24

25 25