ESCO Industry Perspective

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ESCO Industry Perspective"

Clarissa Sims
5 years ago
Views:

1 Opportunities Presented by the Utility Grid ESCO Industry Perspective Kevin Johnson Energy Systems Group August 10, 2016 Rhode Island Convention Center Providence, Rhode Island

2 Agenda ESG Nation wide Utility Interactions Industry Approaches to Support Grid Opportunities For Federal & Utilities UESC ESPC EUL Utility Privatization Support Industry Offering Keys to Success for Federal Customers 2

3 ESG Nation wide Utility Interactions Federal Projects 3

4 ESG Nation wide Utility Interactions CHP & WTE 4

MCLB Albany: Landfill Gas to Energy CHP funded via ESPC LFG Electric Offset 11% LFG Natural Gas Offset 12% 2013 Energy Star CHP Award $20,460,945 Implementation Cost $1,722,380 Annual Savings

3 MMBtu/h of steam Proven island mode capable Dual Fuel Equipment (generator and boilers) Redundant Steam Production Installed two dual fuel (LFG/Natural Gas) boilers to burn excess LFG Developed

5 MCLB Albany: Landfill Gas to Energy CHP funded via ESPC LFG Electric Offset 11% LFG Natural Gas Offset 12% 2013 Energy Star CHP Award $20,460,945 Implementation Cost $1,722,380 Annual Savings Electric 41% Natural Gas 36% Renewable Energy = 23% Total Consumption Designed and Constructed Landfill Gas to Energy CHP Plant 1.9 MW of renewable electric power Up to 13.3 MMBtu/h of steam Proven island mode capable Dual Fuel Equipment (generator and boilers) Redundant Steam Production Installed two dual fuel (LFG/Natural Gas) boilers to burn excess LFG Developed infrastructure to support plant Construction of LFG compression anddehydration station at the county landfill Installed underground LFG and condensate piping system (3+ miles) Modified electrical feed to allow interconnection of the generator to electric grid Underground steam piping system connected to boiler plant Lighting and EMCS Upgrades Renewable ECMs > M&V Option B 5

6 MCLB Albany: Renewables Bundled with ESPC $20,460,945 Implementation Cost $1,722,380 Annual Savings Energy Conservation Measures Renewable Efficiency 21% 33% 79% 67% Landfill Gas to Energy CHP Plant Electrical Feed Modifications Renewable Efficiency Renewable ECM only = 14.1 year simple payback Renewable + Efficiency ECMs = 11.9 year simple payback EMCS Upgrades Two LEED dual fuel (LFG/Natural Silverstatus boilers to Gas) burn facility excess LFG Lighting Upgrades LFG Compression and Dehydration Station a Underground LFG and Condensate Piping (3+ miles) Connect underground steam piping to boiler plant 6

Solar funded via UESC at MCSF Blount Island $4,602,295 Implementation

10,000 GPM pumping capacity Backup battery system 3 day operation w/o

with twelve 10 x 4 flat panels One 500 gal storage tank, two drain

PV Fed directly into building electric distribution 240 Tons

Supplies 7 water source heat pumps Building 450 Used as the cooling

controls & motors, lighting, transformer, spray foam insulation,

7 Solar funded via UESC at MCSF Blount Island $4,602,295 Implementation Cost $496,725 Annual Savings Solar Powered Pond Circulators (2 ponds) 10,000 GPM pumping capacity Backup battery system 3 day operation w/o sun Solar Thermal Delivers 84 mmbtu annually One collector system with twelve 10 x 4 flat panels One 500 gal storage tank, two drain back tanks with heat exchanger, controller sensors, pumps 40 kw Solar PV Fed directly into building electric distribution 240 Tons Geothermal (independent injection and extraction points) Building 104 Supplies 7 water source heat pumps Building 450 Used as the cooling source for a new magnetic bearing chiller Efficiency ECMs AMR, controls & motors, lighting, transformer, spray foam insulation, HVAC, UV lighting, compressed air system repair Performance Verification Method > IPMV Option A 7

Renewables Bundled with UESC at Blount Island $4,602,295 Implementation Cost $496,725 Annual Savings Energy Conservation Measures Renewable Efficiency 61% 39% Renewable 83% Efficiency 17% Renewable

8 Renewables Bundled with UESC at Blount Island $4,602,295 Implementation Cost $496,725 Annual Savings Energy Conservation Measures Renewable Efficiency 61% 39% Renewable 83% Efficiency 17% Renewable ECM only = 21.8 year simple payback Renewable + Efficiency ECMs = 9.3 year simple payback Automatic Meter Reading Solar thermal 40 kw Solar PV High efficiency lighting retrofits Controls and motors upgrades Spray foam insulation Solar powered pond circulators Transformer replacements Compressed air system repairs Geothermal energy systems HVAC upgrades & AHU UV Lights 8

VA Energy Centers: Grid Resiliency through EUL James A.

1,500 tons (Steam driven) Steam: 250,000 lbs/hour James H.

8 megawatts (ICE) Chilled Water: 4,900 tons (inc.

9 VA Energy Centers: Grid Resiliency through EUL James A. Lovell FHCC North Chicago, IL Electricity: 12 megawatts (GT) Chilled Water: 1,500 tons (Steam driven) Steam: 250,000 lbs/hour James H. Quillen VAMC Mountain Home, TN Electricity: 6.8 megawatts (ICE) Chilled Water: 4,900 tons (inc tons absorption) Chilled Water Storage: 800,000 gallons Steam: 103,800 lbs/hour Jesse Brown VAMC Chicago, IL Electricity: 3.4 megawatts (GT) Chilled Water: 3,000 tons Steam: 100,000 lbs/hour 9

10 Dominion Base of Tomorrow: Grid Resiliency through UP 10

11 Industry Offering Keys to Success Include utilities in Master Planning Win Win Demand reduction first through UESC or other PPP options Bundling to maximize savings benefit to support resiliency opportunities Capitalize on available rebates & incentives Evaluate all potential distributed options (Solar Voltaic, Fuel Cells, Battery Storage, CHP/Co Generation, Geothermal Energy, Wind, etc.) to see what may work for resilient grid options ESCO industry is available to support Utilities and Federal needs 11

12 Thank You! Kevin G. Johnson Senior Director, Federal Engagement & Development T: F: