City of Hamilton Airport Employment Growth District. Transportation Master Plan Implementation Update

Transcription

1 ity of Hamilton Employment Growth District Transportation Master Plan Implementation Update December 2016

2 TABLE OF ONTENTS 1.0 Introduction AEGD Transportation Master Plan Land Use and Trip Generation Emme Modifications and Analysis Modifications from Previously Recommended way Projects Final Recommended Project Phasing and Revised ost Estimates Anticipated Timing of Transportation Infrastructure and Water/Wastewater Servicing onclusion TABLES Table 1: Employee Forecasts... 5 Table 2: TAZ Trip Generation... 6 Table 3: Transportation Base Model Network Revisions/Inclusions... 8 Table 4: Modifications from Previously Recommended way Projects...15 Table 5: Improvement Plan - Final...18 FIGURES Figure 1: Updated Preferred Land Use... 4 Figure 2: AEGD Traffic Zone Structure...12 Figure 3: 2031 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Phase Figure 4: 2031 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Phase Figure 5: AEGD Revised Network and Phasing...24 Figure 6: AEGD Revised Final Network and Land Use...25 Figure 7: AEGD Revised Recreation Trails...26 Figure 8: AEGD Revised Truck Route Network...27 Dillon onsulting Page ii

3 1.0 INTRODUTION On February 17th, 2015, the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) approved the Employment Growth District (AEGD) Secondary Plan (Appendix 24 of the Urban Hamilton Official Plan) which was based on the Minutes of Settlement signed by the ity of Hamilton, Silvestri Investments, Twenty West Landowners Group, and raig Smith. The approved Secondary Plan included revised Land Use Schedule showing lands subject to the Secondary Plan which were added to the ity of Hamilton Urban Boundary. ompared to the initial Secondary Plan Land Use approved by ouncil in 2010, there are four notable geographic differences: Addition of land west of Highway 6 and east of Fiddler s Green ; Addition of lands south of Book East, and west of Smith ; Removal of Silvestri lands (south of Garner East, north of the Utility orridor, and west of Smith ); and Removal of Twenty West lands (east of, South of Twenty West, and North of Dickenson West) while maintaining a Garth Street orridor. The newly approved Secondary Plan will affect the future needs of the transportation system. The purpose of the updated transportation analysis is to confirm the ultimate network recommendations and the potential change in timing and priorities of improvements and service provisions required to accommodate the new land use configuration AEGD TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN In June of 2011, Dillon completed a comprehensive Transportation Master Plan for the AEGD (based on the original land use as identified in Figure 5 of the 2011 AEGD TMP). There were a number of Part II orders received by the ity and the Ministry of Environment and limate hange during the 30 day review period for the lass EA and as a result, the schedules of two projects (Dickenson and New 7E way) were changed from Schedule B to Schedule. Overall, the specific objectives of the 2011 Transportation Master Plan included: Preparing a transportation strategy that supports development of the AEGD; Identifying problems or opportunities and related alternative solutions to transportation issues anticipated for a 2031 horizon; Identifying and protecting future transportation corridors; Integrating policies, programs, funding and infrastructure needs; Identifying preliminary cost estimates for transportation infrastructure improvement projects; and Dillon onsulting Page 1

4 Developing a Transportation Master Plan for the AEGD to satisfy Phases 1 and 2 of the Municipal lass Environmental Assessment process. As a result of the analysis and assessment undertaken at the time, a number of infrastructure and service improvements were necessary to achieve the preferred road network alternative. Network recommendations were identified within the study area for: Infrastructure including: New and expanded roadways; Typical cross-sections; Greenway provisions; way improvements; and Other transportation-related infrastructure (e.g. Employment Supportive entres and integrated transit facilities, cycling lanes, and a pedestrian and trails network); Transit recommendations identified the development of local and regional transit initiatives to provide high quality service to the AEGD area; Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures and guidelines were recommended for the AEGD. ycling/pedestrian/trails networks were developed to provide multi-modal connections throughout the AEGD; and Potential Truck Routes were identified based on the need for goods movement between the study area and major goods movement destinations. These findings were consistent with those of the ity s Truck Route Master Plan. In particular, where relevant and significant, ity documents that guided the development of the original TMP and this update included: ity-wide Transportation Master Plan (2007) and Update; ycling Master Plan Shifting Gears (2009); Truck Route Master Plan Study Final Report (April 2010); Transit Oriented Development Guidelines for Hamilton (August 2010); Pedestrian Mobility Plan Step Forward (December 2012); Rapid Ready Expanding Mobility hoices in Hamilton (February 2013); Multi-year Accessibility Plan (2013 to 2017); Transit Bus Stop Accessibility riteria and Guidelines (January 2014); Ten Year Local Transit Strategy (2015 to 2024); Transportation Demand Management for Development (June 2015); o-ordinated Street Furniture Guidelines (August 2015); and Recreation Trails Master Plan (May 2016); The following sections describe the updates made to the transportation assessment to reflect the long-term land use change, and the implications of these changes to the recommended transportation network plan. Dillon onsulting Page 2

5 3.0 LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION In 2015 a settlement was reached at the OMB between the ity and the development community that allowed for the Secondary Plan to be finalized and approved. The settlement included study area land use changes that affected the trip generation calculations. This memo provides an update to the Transportation Master Plan that reflects the impacts of changes to the land uses and configuration of the AEGD. Figure 1 identifies the preferred land use used for this update based on the settlement at the OMB. In determining the employment levels in the revised areas, assumptions from the original AEGD analysis were carried forward along with some minor tweaks as follows: Net land use area represents 80% of the identified gross land use area; Employment densities; and New institutional densities of 11 people per hectare were provided by ity. Dillon onsulting Page 3

6 R GA NE AD O RR I SM TH TH WEST 5TH ST TH AD RO I SM TE O AD RO Land Use Designations DIKENSON ROAD FRENH ROAD Light Industrial Prestige Business Institutional Natural Open Space Utility Reserve ENGLISH HURH ROAD Other Features Employment Supportive entre U SO D OA R K John. Munro Hamilton International TH Greenbelt Natural Heritage System TE O AD RO FID ER DL Secondary Plan Area SG Additional Study Area RE Lands Subject to Rural Hamilton Official Plan EN AD RO AI R TT BU E AD O RR PO RT Urban Boundary RO AD AIRPORT ROAD HOMESTEAD DRIVE O BO Related Business DIKENSON ROAD PRIVATE ROAD O BO D OA R K Airside Industrial Employment Growth District Study Boundary AIRPORT ROAD Figure 1 Employment Growth District AEGD Final Approved Land Use GLANASTER ROAD E UPPER JAMES STREET U SO RN A G D OA R R 20 ROAD GLANASTER ROAD AD RO 20 ROAD RYMAL ROAD GARTH STREET RYMAL ROAD WHITE HURH ROAD A UK L R D OA R E ST E W m December 2016 Planning and Economic Development Department

7 Table 1 summarizes the employment calculations for the subject lands. Table 1: Employee Forecasts Area of Land Employment Density Distribution Emp / Net Net Ha Net Acre of Land Emp / Net Ha Acre Total Employment (Target) Airside Industrial % ,132 Related Business % ,299 Light Industrial % ,451 Prestige Business % ,509 Institutional (hurch) % Institutional (ollege) % Institutional (Secondary School) % TOTAL 692 1, % ,843 These employment values were used to recalculate the number of trips for the subject lands, using the following methodology: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition rates were used for consistency with previous analysis; Trip generations were calculated from employment numbers from AEGD assumed densities; Adjustments were made to trip generation rates to account for mode share targets set by the ity; Additional trip generation rates were added based on an employment density of 11 employees per net hectare for institutional land uses as provided by the ity; and Phase 1 and 2 trip generation outputs were used as input to Emme model. As an AM peak hour model, rates were only calculated for the AM peak hour. Table 2 provides an overview of the trip generation by Hamilton Traffic Analysis Zone. Dillon onsulting Page 5

8 Zone Number Area Description Table 2: TAZ Trip Generation Net Area (Ha) Employment AM Peak Hour Trips AM Peak Phase Phase Phase Phase Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Total Total In Out In Out In Out 101 Garner West Garner East ,279 1, Northwest , , Southwest ,438 1, West Northeast Southeast ,484 1, Book Northwest ,416 2, , , Twenty Greenbelt Smith North Smith South North ,808 1, North entral ,653 3, ,434 1,209 2,434 1, Dickenson North , , Upper James North , , Northeast , , Upper James East inal East , , East Existing ,056 1,190 TOTAL - Excluding ,928 14,915 23,843 3, ,954 2,630 10,336 3,268 GRAND TOTAL ,928 14,915 23,843 3,730 1,030 7,662 3,428 11,392 4,458 Dillon onsulting Page 6

9 4.0 EMME MODIFIATIONS AND ANALYSIS As with the original Master Plan work, the ity s strategic demand forecasting tool (Emme) was used to generate travel demand forecasts for the updated AEGD Study Area. Since the 2011 plan, the ity has initiated several key studies for which the model has been modified and enhanced, most notably the city-wide Transportation Master Plan Update (ole Engineering) and the LRT Planning, Design, and Engineering Study (Steer Davies Gleave). The most recent 2011 and 2031 horizon year Emme models from the TMP Update were provided by the ity in April 2016 and were used for the development of the revised AEGD land use scenario. Network modifications were made within the model to represent the anticipated study area road network. Table 3 identifies the revisions made to the base 2031 network for the purposes of the updated AEGD analysis. This included some modifications that are identified as Network Housekeeping in order to ensure that the model reflected the appropriate base condition. Other changes to the model included modifications to the Volume Delay Function (VDF). Volume Delay Functions are equations used within the model to express the travel time on the roadway as a function of the volume on that portion of the roadway - meaning that as congestion increases, so does travel time. Type within the model is an indication of the role and function of a roadway in a network such as its typical lane capacity and travel speed. Dillon onsulting Page 7

10 Table 3: Transportation Base Model Network Revisions/Inclusions Link From To Modification Garner Fiddler s Green Twenty Upper James Street Match characteristics of Rymal to East Reduce speed to 60 km/h Modify Volume Delay Function (VDF) to 36 Modify Type to 646 Increase lanes to 2 lanes each direction Increase capacity to 1400 vehicles per hour (vph) Twenty ( to West) Match Twenty to East Add 1 lane each direction Add speed of 60 km/h Add capacity of 1400 vph Dickenson Dickenson (New onnection) Book (Removed) Upper James Street Increase lanes to 2 lanes each direction Increase capacity to 1600 vph Smith Match characteristics of Dickenson to East Add 1 lane each direction Add speed of 60 km/h Add capacity of 1600 vph Smith Removed due to Dickenson realignment Book Smith Highway 6 Reduce speed to 60 km/h Increase lanes to 3 lanes each direction Increase capacity to 2400 vph Modify VDF to 31 Modify Type to 644 Dillon onsulting Page 8

11 Link From To Modification Garth Street (New onnection) Twenty Dickenson Match Garth Street to North Add 1 lane each direction Add speed of 60 km/h Add capacity of 1400 vph Garner Dickenson Similar to Twenty Increase speed to 60 km/h Increase lanes to 2 lanes each direction Increase capacity to 1400 vph Modify VDF to 31 Modify Type to 644 Garner Book Similar to Twenty Increase speed to 60 km/h Increase lanes to 2 lanes each direction Increase capacity to 1400 vph Modify VDF to 31 Modify Type to 644 Homestead Drive Upper James Street Trinity-hurch onnection (New onnection) 6N / 7E (New onnection) Upper James Street (North Access) Upper James Street (North Access) Restrict network access to southbound direction only Rymal Highway 6 Increase speed to 60 km/h north of Dickenson Reduce speed to 60 km/h south of Dickenson Upper James Street Red Hill Valley Parkway (RHVP) Upper James Street Used 1400 vph capacity and 70 km/h speed as configured at RHVP junction. Add speed of 60 km/h Add 2 lanes Add capacity of 1000 vph Dillon onsulting Page 9

12 Link From To Modification Other Minor s - - Network Housekeeping Garden Avenue Dickenson Fiddler s Green Upper James Street Add speed of 50 km/h Add 1 lane Add capacity of 500 vph Garner Reduce speed to 50 km/h Modify VDF to 20 Modify Type to 643 Nebo Reduce capacity to 500 vph to match adjacent original links to east/west Garth Street Rymal Twenty Reduce lanes to 1 lane each direction Reduce capacity to 700 vph Modify VDF to 31 Highway 6 / Butter - - Upper James Street White hurch Upper James Street Modify to grade separation per existing conditions Nebo Reduce capacity to 500 vph to match adjacent corridors Nebo Reduce speed to 60 km/h to match adjacent corridors Modifications to the study area structure were also made to recreate the detail used for the 2011 AEGD transportation work. These modifications were as follows: Increased zone detail from 386 TAZ to 406 TAZs to include more detail within study area; o Added TAZ prefix pattern of 9XXX to reflect TAZs in trip generation table above; o Included Mount Hope residential area (south east of the airport) as TAZ 9004, using the same values as in the previous 2011 AEGD analysis; and o Figure 2 provides an overview of study area TAZ structure; For new matrices with AEGD demands, the original parent TAZ trip patterns with revised Productions and Attractions was used for the AEGD update; reated two new scenarios from 2031 base model: o Phase 1 area employment limited mostly to land uses coming online in northern portion of study area; and o Phase 2 area employment mostly surrounding the airport itself. Dillon onsulting Page 10

13 Travel demand forecasts for these scenarios were generated. Figure 3 and Figure 4 provide auto volume assignment results for the two 2031 scenarios. Dillon onsulting Page 11

14 Figure 2: AEGD Traffic Zone Structure Dillon onsulting Page 12

15 Figure 3: 2031 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Phase 1 Dillon onsulting Page 13

16 Figure 4: 2031 A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Phase 2 Dillon onsulting Page 14

17 5.0 MODIFIATIONS FROM PREVIOUSLY REOMMENDED ROADWAY PROJETS The travel demands as assigned to the originally recommended road network were reviewed and assessed to confirm their need and contribution to the area traffic conditions. The roadway link volumes were compared to the road improvement plan from the 2011 AEGD Master Plan. The analysis identified projects that need to be accelerated, deferred, modified, or removed based on the revised land use. Table 4 summarizes these projects. The table references the project ID numbers from the 2011 AEGD TMP. Where the need for a project within the Phase 2 or (15-year) timeframe is no longer required due to land use changes or connections to other modified links/improvements, the project can be removed from the Phase 2 (15-year) program and moved to Long- ( beyond 2031 ) timeframe. Table 4: Modifications from Previously Recommended way Projects Id From To Description Phase Notes Accelerated Elements Moved up Timing R21 R22 R23 10N Smith (excluding hydro crossing) Smith Smith Garner 2W Dickenson Hydro orridor North rossing 1 Project shortened due to land use changes EA Schedule 1 1 B Garner Extent R31 1 2W 10N updated Smith Dickenson Moved 1N from Long R64 2 to Deferred Elements Moved to -term (Phase 2) or Long-term time period R4 Upper James Street Alderlea Avenue Homestea d Drive Widening 4 to 6 lanes 2 Moved to Long Dillon onsulting Page 15

18 Id From To Description Phase Notes R12 R15 Twenty Service 12S Aldercrest Avenue (Upper James Street) P41 4E 5E P44 White hurch 4E 12S P45 White hurch 5E 12S Modified Elements Modified timing or description Garner R1 R2 R13 Twenty Twenty Twenty Book 2 New 4 lane 2 4 lane re 4 lane re New 4 lane Moved to Moved to Long Moved to Long Moved to Long Moved to Long hanged timing for 2 to 4 lane reconstruct ion due to higher demands, removed R47 hanged timing for 2 to 4 lane reconstruct ion due to higher demands, removed R48 hanged widening consistent with demands, removed R55 EA Schedule B B B Dillon onsulting Page 16

19 Id From To Description Phase Notes R16 1N 2E New 4 lane 2 Increased capacity required to accommod ate higher demands EA Schedule Removed Elements - Removed from the - or Long- Networks R29 Garner 1W 10N - B R30 1W 10N Twenty - R47 R48 R55 R58 R65 R66 P70 Twenty 1N Smith Smith 11N Garner Twenty Twenty Book Smith 2E Garner Dickenson Hydro orridor North rossing Fiddler's Green 9W - Long B - Long B - Long - Long 2 lane re - Long - Long B - Long B 6.0 FINAL REOMMENDED PROJET PHASING AND REVISED OST ESTIMATES Based on the above findings, Table 5 summarizes the revised timing and costs of the recommended AEGD Improvement Plan and projects are shown in Figure 5. This table references the project ID numbers from the 2011 AEGD plan. The table highlights those aspects of projects (timing or description) that have been modified from the original recommendations. In the original 2011 plan, detailed assessments of cross-sectional elements were considered to determine right-of-way (ROW) needs (see Figures 33 to 36 in the original 2010 AEGD TMP) and were reviewed in the updated assessment. Dillon onsulting Page 17

20 With regard to the road costs, the following is noted: ost estimates have been updated to 2016 $ based on available tender package quotes from other roadway project work; Unit costs were used where possible; Applied general trend of 20% increase for lump sum items over 2011 analysis; and Property costs were update by applying onsumer Price Index (PI) change between 2008 and 2016 (estimated at 1.11 over the 8 years). The general methodology undertaken to derive road costs related to transportation projects was as follows: Identify unit costs for materials related to roadway, drainage, structures, landscaping, electrical, property, utilities, services, and other items; Develop typical per kilometre cross-sections for the various roadway classifications located within the study area; Identify the potential number of intersections, intersection treatments (e.g. traffic signals, roundabouts), bridge works, drainage, property requirements, etc. for individual projects; and alculate total road costs for the length of the specified project. The costing indicated reflects costs only (2016 $). Table 5: Improvement Plan - Final Id From To Description North-South Arterials R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Upper James Street Garth Street Garth Street Garner Twenty Garner Alderlea Avenue Twenty Dickenson Twenty Book Dickenson Homestea d Drive Dickenson 2E 4 lane re 4 lane re Widening 4 to 6 lanes New 4 lane New 4 lane Total ost* ($M) Anticipated Timing EA Schedule 6.61 Short Long Dillon onsulting Page 18

21 Id From To Description R46 R49 Fiddler's Green North-South s Smith (excluding R22 hydro crossing) R23 R24 R25 R26 R27 R28 R31 R32 R33 P42 P43 P44 P45 R63 Smith 1E 6E 7E 7E 2W 2W 7N 2E 4E 5E Garner Butter Garner arluke White hurch Dickenson Hydro orridor North rossing Dickenson 1N 6N 6N Dickenson 6N Garner 10N Book 1N 1N 12S 12S Book Dickenson Dickenson 6N Upper James Street 10N Dickenson Boundary Boundary White hurch White hurch 1N New 4 lane 2 lane re Total ost* ($M) Anticipated Timing EA Schedule Long Long Short 1.18 Short B ** B 5.25 Short 3.12 Short 2.84 Short 3.65 Short Long B 1.41 Long B 4.01 Long ** Dillon onsulting Page 19

22 Id From To Description R64 R67 R68 P77 P78 P79 P80 Smith 8W 9W (south) Smith 3E 6W East-West Arterials Dickenson Garner Garner Boundary 1N 12S 3S R7 Book Highway 6 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 Garner Dickenson Dickenson Dickenson Twenty Twenty Fiddler's Green Smith East argo 1N 5N arluke Butter Boundary White hurch Butter Upper James Street Smith Aldercrest Avenue (Upper James Street) Upper James Street 2 lane re 2 lane re New 4 lane New 4 lane 2-lane Re Total ost* ($M) 2.84 Anticipated Timing EA Schedule 5.84 Long Long 3.15 Long 1.95 Long ** B 1.53 Long B 2.45 Long ** ** ** 1.84 Short B Dillon onsulting Page 20

23 Id From To Description R14b R15 R50 Service Book inal Access Rd Fiddler's Green R51 Book Highway 6 R52 R53 R54 R56 R57 Butter Dickenson arluke E White hurch Fiddler's Green Butter Fiddler's Green East West s R16 1N Book R17 E 2W R18 R19 R20 R21 Garner Smith 6N 6N 10N 10N 6E P40 P41 R59 7N 12S 5N 4E Fiddler's Green East argo Highway 6 Smith Highway 6 2E 6E 7E Smith 2W 2W 5E 8W New 4 lane Widening 4 to 6 lanes Widening 4 to 6 lanes New 4 lane 2 lane re New 4 lane New 4 lane Total ost* ($M) Anticipated Timing EA Schedule 0.56 Short B 8.86* ** Long 4.06 Long 4.85 Long 9.38 Long 4.47 Long 2.3 Long B 4.56 Long Long ** B 3.78 Short 2.83 Short 2.35 Short Long B 3.20 Long Dillon onsulting Page 21

24 Id From To Description R60 R61 R62 2S Butter E 8S Fiddler's Green Fiddler's Green 9W 9W 2 lane re Total ost* ($M) Anticipated Timing EA Schedule 1.56 Long B 3.26 Long 1.56 Long B P69 P71 P72 P73 P74 P75 P76 2N 1S 3S 6S 6S 7S 12S 7N Fiddler's Green 6W (north) Fiddler's Green 3E Smith 9W (south) 9W 4E 2.43 Long ** 1.56 Long B 1.96 Long B 2.71 Long 3.45 Long 1.69 Long B 1.27 Long B * costs include property and exclude transit-related landscaping costs. costs are in 2016$. ** Timing to be coordinated with Water and Wastewater Servicing. *** osts for project R15 Service are based on a four-lane arterial road cross-section and the alignment as identified in Figure 5. The costs for this project, and other projects identified with proposed alignments, could change as actual alignment will be determined through the EA/detailed design process. Notes: 1) Anticipated timing represents approximate horizons as follows Phase 1 - Short (0-5 years), Phase 2 - (5-15 years), and Long (beyond 2031). Timing is subject to change based on available funding, combination with other capital works projects, and other potential timing influences. 2) With the exception of R64, projects with ID numbers 46 to 80 were not originally calculated because they were beyond the 2031 program. Future street design will conform to design guidelines and specific elements to be included in the design of a roadway (e.g., on-road bike route) would be identified at the detailed design stage. The final road network and phasing is provided in Figure 5. Figure 6 shows the final road network with the roads and road type labeled. These modifications do not result in any significant changes to the recommended recreational Dillon onsulting Page 22

25 trails networks. The final recreational trails network can be found in Figure 7. 1 There are also no significant changes to the truck route network; the final truck route network can be found in Figure ANTIIPATED TIMING OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUTURE AND WATER/WASTEWATER SERVIING In all cases, the timing of transportation infrastructure and water/wastewater servicing is dependent on the timing of development. In specific cases (as noted in Table 4), the identified timing for water/wastewater servicing needs is earlier than demands for transportation infrastructure. Therefore transportation infrastructure should be advanced as necessary to minimize capital cost of and implementation. The specific road projects and sections of road projects that should be considered for advancement to Phase 1 (2016 to 2021) are as follows: R8 Garner, Fiddler s Green to ; R9 - Dickenson, Garth Street to Upper James; R12 Twenty, to Aldercrest Avenue; R18-6N, Garth Street to 6E; and R25 1E, 6N to Dickenson. 1 Figure 7 shows proposed carpool lots which have not changed from the 2011 AEGD TMP. It should be noted that the ownership, location, and details of carpool lots are to be planned at a later stage. The ity s intent is that the carpool lots are to be located in strategic locations and be municipally operated. Implementation would be best achieved through dedication of portions of employment lands parking areas for carpooling determined through the subdivision/site plan application process. Dillon onsulting Page 23

26 R3 () R26 () GARNER RD R8 () 3 R46 () R8 () 3 R68 () R59 () R46 () R67 () R8 () 3 R59 () R68 () SOUTHOTE RD R50 () R68 () R8 () 3 R1 () R8 () 3 R20 () R1 () SOUTHOTE RD R8 () 3 R8 () 3 R22 () R22 () R20 () R33 () R2 () R31 () R21 () R23 (B) R13 () P69 () 4 R2 () R22 () P40 () R32 () R32 () R13 () R10/R54 (B) R63 () 4 P69 () 4 R13 () R64 () GLANASTER RD SOUTHOTE RD R50 () R7/R51 () R7/R51 () R17 (B) R22 () P40 () R63 () 4 P69 () 4 R32 () R11 () R16 () P78 (B) 4 R11 () R16 () R3 () R3 () R3 () R24 (B) P42 () R18 () 1 R9 () 2 R12 () 1 R25 () 1 R16 () R18 () 1 R9 () 2 GARTH ST P43 () R5 () R6 () R18 () 1 R12 () 1 R9 () 2 R9 () 2 R19 () R27 () R28 () R9 () 2 R4 () R28 () UPPER JAMES ST R4 () R4 () TWENTY RD DIKENSON RD ENGLISH HURH RD Legend Secondary Plan Area, Phase 1 Projects (Short ) Secondary Plan Area, Phase 2 Projects ( ) Additional Study Area Projects (Long ) Employment Growth District Secondary Plan Boundary Secondary Plan Area (Phase 1 - Short ) Secondary Plan Area (Phase 2 - ) Lands Subject to Rural Hamilton Official Plan Additional Study Area (Long ) P77 () Hydro orridor SHAVER RD BOOK RD BUTTER RD R46 () FIDDLER'S GREEN RD R46 () P71 (B) R68 () R68 () R60 (B) R46 () R68 () R52 () R46 () R68 () R46 () BUTTER RD P75 (B) R52 () R68 () R46 () R62 (B) P80 () P72 (B) R53 () P74 () R61 () R53 () P73 () R56 () ARLUKE RD R56 () P77 () GLANASTER RD R49 () R49 () R49 () R49 () R15 () R57 () P79 (B) AIRPORT RD P76 (B) P44 (B) P41 (B) R57 () P45 (B) R14b (B) R57 () R14 (B) WHITE HURH RD FERRIS RD John. Munro Hamilton International Employment Growth District AEGD Revised Network Phasing Reserve Notes: 1 Projects R12, R18, and R25 are high priority projects for Phase 2. 2 Project R9 (Dickenson ) is a Phase 1 priority project as it is foundational to the development of the AEGD. 3 Project R8 (Garner ) is already programmed through the ity's capital plan. 4 Projects R63, P69, and P78 are to be coordinated with water and wastewater servicing in Phase 1 or Phase 2 as needed. Location of new proposed roads reflects a potential alignment. Actual alignment of new proposed roads is to be determined during the EA/detailed design process Figure 5 December 2016 Planning and Economic Development Department

27 Prestige Business Institutional W Reserve Other Features DIKENSON I SM 1N TH UPPER JAMES N GLANASTER W W 2 r o t Utility E N r7 r6 Natural Open Space cto cto o lle o lle K ec l l o N r5 Light Industrial 6E r2 E O BO r8 r9 cto 6N AREA E Dickenson cto cto SG ER DL FID lle o l o N lle o Site Specific Policy Area AREA G Employment Supportive entre Major Arterial AREA G Major Arterial (Potential Alignment) Minor Arterial Major EN RE Major (Potential Alignment) Minor c uth So John. Munro Hamilton International r Greenbelt Natural Heritage System UPPER JAMES W to c e l ol A IR PO ER T T BU Proposed Service (Potential Alignment) ote r6 6S RT Lands Subject to Rural Hamilton Official Plan Urban Boundary Employment Growth Distict Study Boundary AIRPORT Figure 6 Employment Growth District Service r9 W WHITE HURH EN RE E K LU R A AEGD Revised Network and Land Use 12S 5E cto c S SG ER DL FID lle o 8 r o t Trinity - hurch orrridor 4E lle o lle o r o t c 7S 3E to S r2 Minor (Potential Alignment) AREA F cto ec l l o lle o r o t c lle o lle o r cto 1S 3S GLANASTER to 1N 1 r lle o c lle o AREA H le c 7 r o t cto OT H UT SO AREA B AREA I lle o TH Tw ty n e Related Business TWENTY 1E AREA A I SM AREA te x E i ns on Airside Industrial Garth AREA D Land Use Designations 2E ER N R GA GLANASTER AREA m December 2016 Planning and Economic Development Department

28 SOUTHOTE RD TWENTY RD GARNER RD GARTH ST SOUTHOTE RD GLANASTER RD UPPER JAMES ST DIKENSON RD Legend AEGD ycling and Pedestrian Facilities Recreational Facilities (RTMP 2016) Proposed Mulit-Use Recreational Trail Proposed On- Bike Routes Existing Trail Amenity (Hydro Line) AEGD Features Proposed Multi-Use Recreational Trail Proposed Reserved Bike Lanes and Sidewalks Proposed ar Pools Lot Enhanced Transit Stop SOUTHOTE RD ENGLISH HURH RD Gateway Secondary Plan Area BOOK RD BUTTER RD FIDDLER'S GREEN RD BUTTER RD GLANASTER RD AIRPORT RD WHITE HURH RD Lands Subject to Rural Hamilton Official Plan Additional Study Area Reserve Utilities Greenbelt Natural Heritage System Provincial Highway John. Munro Hamilton International Figure 7 Employment Growth District AEGD Revised Recreation Trails SHAVER RD ARLUKE RD FERRIS RD December 2016 Planning and Economic Development Department

29 TWENTY RD GARNER RD GARTH ST SOUTHOTE RD GLANASTER RD UPPER JAMES ST DIKENSON RD Legend Proposed Interchange Provincial Highway Full Time Truck Routes Beyond the Hamilton AEGD Hamilton AEGD Proposed Full Time Truck Routes SOUTHOTE RD ENGLISH HURH RD Potential onnections Arterial (Major/Minor) Proposed Arterial (Potential Alignment) SHAVER RD BOOK RD BUTTER RD FIDDLER'S GREEN RD BUTTER RD GLANASTER RD AIRPORT RD Proposed Service (Potential Alignment) Secondary Plan Area Lands Subject to Rural Hamilton Official Plan Additional Study Area Employment Growth District Secondary Plan Boundary John. Munro Hamilton International Figure 8 Employment Growth District AEGD Truck Route Network WHITE HURH RD ARLUKE RD FERRIS RD December 2016 Planning and Economic Development Department

30 8.0 ONLUSION Based on the reassessment of the road network in consideration of the revised land use allocation, the following conclusions are reached: The revised land use allocation results in modest changes to the travel demand in the 2021 and 2031 transportation network conditions; Accelerated, deferred, modified, and removed elements as assessed are summarized in Table 4 with the final proposed road improvement plan in Table 5; The identified timing for specific projects should be advanced as necessary to align with the identified timing for water/wastewater servicing needs: o R8 Garner, Fiddler s Green to ; o R9 - Dickenson, Garth Street to Upper James; o R12 Twenty, to Aldercrest Avenue; o R18-6N, Garth Street to 6E; and o R25 1E, 6N to Dickenson. These changes do not result in any proposed changes to the recommended transit network from the 2011 AEGD TMP; These changes do not result in any significant changes to the recommended recreational trails (Figure 7) nor the truck route networks (Figure 8); and Overall, these changes as assessed in this Master Plan update represent minor revisions that do not significantly impact the substance of the 2011 Transportation Master Plan. The changes are predominately variations to timing of projects and the removal of a number of projects that are no longer needed with the revised land use configuration. Based on the findings, it is not anticipated that formal public consultation is required as part of this Master Plan update process. Dillon onsulting Page 28