for the January 2018 MRB Group Project No

Transcription

1 Town of Canandaigua 5440 Route 5 & 20 West Canandaigua, New York PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT for the TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA WATER BOOSTER STATION, TRANSMISSION MAIN, & STORAGE TANKS January 2018 MRB Group Project No Prepared by: 145 Culver Road, Suite #160 Rochester, NY (585) (585) fax info@mrbgroup.com Copyright 2018 by MRB Group All Rights Reserved The following is an excerpt from the New York Education Law Article 145 Section 7209 and applies to this document. It is a violation of this law for any person unless he is acting under the direction of a Licensed Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the Seal of an Engineer or Land Surveyor is altered, the Altering Engineer or Land Surveyor shall affix to the item his Seal and the Notation Altered By followed by his signature and the date of such alteration and a specific description of the alteration.

2 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...3 II. INITIATION AND BACKGROUND...5 III. PROJECT PLANNING AREA...6 A. PROJECT LOCATION...6 B. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRESENT...6 C. LONG RANGE PLANNING...7 IV. EXISTING FACILITIES...7 A. WEST STREET PUMP STATION (WSPS)...7 B. CRAMER ROAD WATER STORAGE TANK...7 C. WATER QUALITY...8 V. NEED FOR PROJECT...8 A. HEALTH AND SAFETY...8 B. POPULATION GROWTH...11 VI. ALTERNATIVES...12 A. ALTERNATIVE 1 NO ACTION TAKEN...12 B. ALTERNATIVE 2 - REPLACE PUMPS IN WEST STREET PUMPING STATION...13 C. ALTERNATIVE 3 UPGRADED TO CRAMER ROAD TANK...13 VII. PROPOSED PROJECT...14 A. PROJECT DESIGN...14 B. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE...16 C. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET...17 D. SHORT-LIVED ASSETS...18 E. INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT...18 VIII. USER COST ANALYSIS...18 A. FUNDING ASSISTANCE...18 B. DEBT SERVICE...19 C. ANNUAL WATER CHARGE...19 IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...21 MRB Group Project No Page 1

3 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 LIST OF TABLES TABLE V.1: CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED SERVICE AREA WATER DEMAND... 9 TABLE V.2: CRAMER ROAD STORAGE TANK CAPACITY AND DEMAND TABLE V.3: DISINFECTION BYPRODUCT SAMPLE RESULTS TABLE V.4: POPULATION AND WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS TABLE VII.1: SUMMARY - PROJECT COST ESTIMATE TABLE VIII.1: PROJECTED ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE CHARGE TABLE VIII.2: TOTAL ANNUAL WATER CHARGE LIST OF APPENDICES A. LOCATION MAP B. CITY TANK SITE AND TRANSMISSION MAIN CONCEPT C. CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE CONCEPT D. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPS E. STATE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION OFFICE (SHPO) MAPS F. AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT MAP G. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) PART 1 H. CRAMER ROAD TANK INSPECTION REPORT I. HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS J. COST ESTIMATE K. INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT WITH ONTARIO COUNTY L. CITY OF CANANDAIGUA LETTER OF SUPPORT M. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CORRESPONDENCE N. TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA WATER DISTRICTS MAP O. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM P. SMART GROWTH ASSESSMENT FORM MRB Group Project No Page 2

4 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Canandaigua adopted a Water Master Plan in 2017 that comprehensively reviewed the Town s water system and provided an Implementation Plan, which included a timeline for future projects based on short or long-term needs. The proposed improvements described in this Preliminary Engineering Report were identified as short-term actions in the Implementation Plan. As outlined in the Water Master Plan, major deficiencies currently exist in the water system at both the West Street pump station and the Cramer Road tank. The West Street pump station is located in the City of Canandaigua and feeds the Cramer Road tank, which provides water to a large portion of the Town s service area. The pump station currently struggles to meet peak system demands, experiences discharge pressures near the system piping capacity, and is non-compliant with regulatory standards. The Cramer Road tank is undersized to meet current system demands, struggles to maintain minimum pressures at high points in the distribution system, and is in need of structural repairs due to its deteriorating condition. There are also elevated concentrations of disinfection byproducts appearing in various portions of the water system. The deficiencies outlined above are having a detrimental effect on the ability of the Town to meet day-to-day requirements, existing and future demands. In fact, the NYS Department of Health has issued a temporary moratorium on further expansion of the Town s water system until concrete actions are taken towards alleviation of these deficiencies. The proposed improvements outlined in this report were evaluated using advanced hydraulic modeling coupled with population growth projections through the year The best way to resolve the West Street pump station deficiencies is to construct a new pump station on the City of Canandaigua s water tank site with a new transmission main from the new pump station to Middle Cheshire Road. This location offers several hydraulic advantages over the current location on West Street including lower discharge pressures and more stable suction pressures, and eliminates the burden on the City s distribution system which currently supplies the West Street pump station. The new pump station would act as the primary source of water for the Town with the existing West Street pump station remaining as a backup supply. To resolve the deficiencies in the Cramer Road tank, the best solution is to replace the existing 1.5 million gallon (MG) tank with two 1.0 MG tanks for a total storage of 2.0 MG. The new tanks would provide increased storage volume capable of meeting future demands and also MRB Group Project No Page 3

5 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 provide redundancy which will reduce demands on the proposed pump station. The tanks would utilize separate dedicated 12 fill and discharge lines where they tie into a new 16 main inside a new valve vault adjacent to the tanks. The 16 main would be installed from the new valve vault to Cramer Road, connecting the tanks to the distribution system. The new piping system will provide redundancy to and from the tanks, as well as replace the existing undersized 8 tank inlet/outlet pipe that currently limits fire flow in the existing system due to high head loss. The projected cost estimate for the proposed improvements is $7,350,000. The Town plans to apply for funding assistance through the New York State Water Infrastructure Improvements Act (WIIA). The WIIA grant could be up to 60% of the net eligible project costs up to $3,000,000; thereby reducing the project cost to $4,350,000. This remaining cost would be financed through a debt service to the users within the benefited districts and reimbursed using an Ad Valorem Charge Program. The annual debt charge for the average single-family home within the benefited districts was calculated to be $ Combined with the current annual operation and maintenance charge and the typical annual water commodity charge, the annual cost for water is expected to be $458.68, which is well below the New York State Comptroller s threshold for 2018 of $904. In the event that the Town does not receive any funding assistance through the WIIA program and finances the full project cost, the annual debt service charge would increase to $ resulting in an annual cost for water of $ The proposed improvements outlined in this report address the short-term needs in the Town of Canandaigua s water system while proactively planning for future growth. It is essential that this project be moved forward in an expeditious manner to eliminate the deficiencies and temporary moratorium as soon as possible, meet the anticipated June deadline for submission of the WIIA grant application, and minimize escalation of costs associated with the proposed projects. MRB Group Project No Page 4

6 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 II. INITIATION AND BACKGROUND The Town of Canandaigua is responsible for construction, maintaining, and operating the Canandaigua Consolidated Service Area (CCSA), which provides potable water to residents within the Town. Operation of this system includes purchasing water from the City of Canandaigua Treatment Plant located at 3772 West Lake Road. The Town of Canandaigua adopted a Water Master Plan in November of 2017, which comprehensively reviewed the Town s water system in coordination with the Town s adopted Comprehensive Plan, Agricultural Enhancement Plan, and Sewer Master Plan. The Water Master Plan identified significant deficiencies within the Canandaigua Consolidated Water District (CCWD) associated with the: West Street Booster Station Cramer Road water tank Elevated concentrations of disinfection byproducts The Town intends to address these deficiencies through improvements as follows: Construction of a new booster pumping station located on the City of Canandaigua Water Treatment Plant site and utilization of the existing West Street booster station as a backup supply. Installation of a new 16 transmission main from the proposed booster station to Middle Cheshire Road and installation of a new 12 main along Middle Cheshire Road to Nott Road that runs parallel to the existing 12 main. Replacing the existing 1.5 MG Cramer Road water tank with two equally sized 1 MG tanks for a total storage of 2 MG. Replacing the existing 8 inlet/outlet pipe connecting the Cramer Road tank to the distribution system with a new 16 inlet/outlet pipe splitting into a dedicated 12 inlet pipe and 12 outlet pipe to each tank. This engineering report will serve as the basis for a capital improvement project and is required for the Town s application for funding assistance (grant) through the NYS Water Infrastructure Improvement Act (WIIA). MRB Group Project No Page 5

7 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 III. PROJECT PLANNING AREA A. PROJECT LOCATION The improvements proposed in this report are located between two areas: The City of Canandaigua Water Treatment Plant site on County Road 16 and the Cramer Road Tank site. A location map can be found in Appendix A. B. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRESENT A review of available mapping and information obtained from the Department of Environmental Conservation Environmental Resource Mapper identified a number of environmental resources within the area of the project locations (Appendix D). The transmission main between the pump station site and Middle Cheshire Road encounters a state regulated wetland (CL-8) and a state regulated stream that serves as a tributary to Canandaigua Lake ( ) along the proposed alignment. It is anticipated that the transmission main will be installed by method of directional drilling in order to cross the wetlands and stream, minimizing environmental impacts. The use of standard soil and erosion control measures would aid in protecting these environmental resources during construction. Permits from the NYSDEC and Army Corps of Engineers will be required. The Ontario County Agricultural District ONTA001 neighbors both the Cramer Road tank site and the Booster Pump Station site, as well as the transmission mains leaving both sites (Appendix F). Due to the close proximity with the agricultural district, a review and coordination with the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets will be anticipated. A review of available mapping from the NYS Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (Appendix E) indicate that the City of Canandaigua Water Treatment Plant site is partially located within an archeologically sensitive area. Coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was completed as part of the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) and the proposed improvements on both sites were deemed to have no impact on historical or archeological sites. All appropriate environmental and cultural resources will be investigated and documented as part of the required State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR). There do not appear to be any environmental or cultural resources that will be prohibitive to the development of the project. A copy of the SEQR Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part 1 can be MRB Group Project No Page 6

8 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 found in Appendix G. C. LONG RANGE PLANNING The Water Master Plan adopted by the Town is being used as a comprehensive planning tool to meet the needs of the water system in both the immediate future and the long term. The Master Plan took into consideration the projected future growth of the Town through the year An Implementation Plan was created as part of the Master Plan, acting as a guideline and timeline for the Town s water system improvements. The proposed improvements discussed within this engineering report fall within the short-term (0-5 years) timeframe of the Implementation Plan and are designed to be able to meet future needs through IV. EXISTING FACILITIES A. WEST STREET PUMP STATION (WSPS) The West Street Pump Station, located at 3176 West Street, pumps water purchased from the City of Canandaigua to the Cramer Road tank to supply the CCSA. The station was constructed in 1994 and includes two horizontal split case Aurora Model 420, 4x5x12 pumps with 100 HP, 1,750-rpm motors. Regular service to the pumps since commission has included the replacement of pump shafts, bearings, sleeves and seals. The design life at the time of construction for the WSPS was 20 years. The station was originally designed as a duplex pump station with one pump serving as a backup. Recent years have shown that often both pumps must be run simultaneously in order to satisfy maximum daily and peak demands. The summer of 2016, being unusually dry, caused both pumps to operate for extended periods while barely meeting system demands. B. CRAMER ROAD WATER STORAGE TANK The Cramer Road water storage tank is located approximately 1,100 feet south of the intersection of Cramer Road and Rossier Road. The tank serves as primary storage and maintains the hydraulic grade in the CCSA. The painted steel storage tank was constructed in 1969, stores 1.5 million gallons, is 85.6 feet in diameter, and has an overflow depth of 35 feet. The base of the tank is at elevation 1,177.8 feet, based on the NAD88 Datum. The MRB Group Project No Page 7

9 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 tank s high water level is set to approximately 32 feet and the low water level is set to 23 feet in the summer and 26.5 feet in the winter. A single 8 pipe from Cramer Road serves as both the inlet and outlet for the tank. C. WATER QUALITY The City of Canandaigua is solely responsible for the source water quality. Distribution water quality is the responsibility of the Districts. One of the parameters used to monitor water quality is the level of disinfection byproducts. Two forms of disinfection byproducts that are monitored in the distribution system are Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and Five Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). These two parameters are monitored at locations expected to have the oldest water, which are at Onanada Park and at the end of Cooley Road for the CCSA. An additional sample point is located in the Town of Bristol Water District along Route 64. V. NEED FOR PROJECT A. HEALTH AND SAFETY West Street Pump Station In 2010, a pump performance test was conducted on the West Street Pump Station. The test determined the pumps operated between 656 gpm at 263 feet and 665 gpm at 254 feet. Those results matched the performance curve for the pumps and the measured flows in the system as reported by the Town. At those flow rates, the pump was operating at approximately 63 BHP assuming 70% efficiency as indicated on the manufacturers curve. The pump analysis indicated that during average day demand, a single pump typically supplies 560 gpm to 608 gpm depending on tank levels, system demand, and time of day. The analysis also indicated that during normal maximum day demands, with two pumps operating, the total flow from the station ranges from 820 gpm to 980 gpm depending on tank level and time of day. The Recommended Standards for Water Works states, Each booster pumping station shall contain not less than two pumps with capacities such that peak demand can be satisfied with MRB Group Project No Page 8

10 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 the largest pump out of service. Table V.1 below summarizes the water demands of the CCSA in the year Table V.1: Canandaigua Consolidated Service Area Water Demand Average Day (gpm) Max. Day (gpm) Peak Hour (gpm) System Demands (2015) ,248 Pump Station Supply 560 (1 pump) 820 (2 pump) 980 (2 pump) As shown in Table V.1, the pump station cannot supply the peak hour demand and relies on flow from the Cramer Road tank under this scenario. Therefore, the pump station does not comply with the Recommended Standards for Water Works since it does not supply maximum daily or peak hourly flows with the largest pump out of service. Additionally, the review of the pumps and their associated service records indicated they are near the end of their useful design life and should be replaced in the near future. Based on the pump station not meeting the current standards set forth in the Recommended Standards for Water Works and the pumps being near the end of their useful life, there is a strong and immediate need for replacement. Cramer Road Water Tank The Cramer Road tank was inspected in June 2016 by Liquid Engineering Corporation. A copy of the inspection report can be found in Appendix H. The inspection identified several significant coating failures and recommended a full sand blast and recoat of the inside and outside of the tank. The report also commented on the very poor condition of the support columns, citing substantial corrosion and metal loss, with a recommendation that the columns be reinforced or replaced altogether. The following pictures from the inspection report show the high level of corrosion that exists at the typical water level demonstrating the poor condition of the interior support columns. MRB Group Project No Page 9

11 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Cramer Road Tank Support Column Cramer Road Tank Second Support Column A storage analysis of the tank was completed by MRB Group in August 2017 and found that due to a high point in the system on Nott Road, the operating volume in the tank is effectively minimized. Table V.2 below summarizes the findings of the storage analysis. The storage requirements for 2015 are calculated under two conditions: (1) required storage with zero dead storage and (2) required storage volume based on current tank elevations, taking into account the dead storage created due to the high point on Nott Road. Table V.2: Cramer Road Storage Tank Capacity and Demand 2015 (Gallons) 2050 (Gallons) Existing Tank Capacity 1,500,000 1,500,000 Minimum Storage Required 622,000 (1) 1,610,000 (2) 1,570, ,000 (1) Maximum Storage Required 1,710,890 1,830,000 (2) (1) Volume required with no dead storage (2) Volume required including current system dead storage The listed volumes for the year 2050 were based on additional flow from a future pump station designed to provide the projected maximum day demand. Based on Table V.2, the existing tank does not have the storage capacity required to meet current or future demands. MRB Group Project No Page 10

12 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Disinfection Byproducts The Town takes quarterly samples for TTHM and HAA5 levels from the three locations within the CCSA described in Section III.C. The Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) are set at 0.08 mg/l for TTHMs and 0.06 mg/l for HAA5 based on Local Running Annual Averages (LLRA). Table V.3 below summarizes the recent quarterly samples through Table V.3: Disinfection Byproduct Sample Results Onanda Park Cooley Road Bristol Water TTHM (mg/l) HAA5 (mg/l) TTHM (mg/l) HAA5 (mg/l) TTHM (mg/l) HAA5 (mg/l) Q Q Q Q Q Q LRAA As seen in Table V.3, LRAA typical levels at Onanda Park and Cooley Road are well below the MCL, however, the LRAA for the Bristol sample location was above the MCL for TTHMs at 0.82 mg/l. The third quarter results for 2016 show elevated levels at Cooley Road and Onanda Park. The Town currently utilizes a mixing system in the Cramer Road tank to reduce disinfection byproducts. With the proposed replacement of the tank, it is recommended that a mixing system be installed in each new tank. The proposed mixing system for each tank will be more efficient and is designed to achieve greater levels of THM removal than the system currently installed. B. POPULATION GROWTH Population and water demand projections were completed as part of the Water Master Plan. Population projections were provided by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (GFLRPC) utilizing US Census Data, which were used in conjunction with existing MRB Group Project No Page 11

13 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 water demands to calculate projections through the year The existing water demands used in the projections were representative of the CCSA, defined as the area supplied by the West Street Pump Station and Cramer Road tank, including districts in the Towns of Canandaigua, East Bloomfield, and Bristol. Table V.4 below summarizes the projected population and water demands of the CCSA. Table V.4: Population and Water Demand Projections Year Population Avg. Day Max. Day Peak Hour Peak Hour (GPD) (GPD) x4.2 (gpm) x3.2 (gpm) , , ,000 1, , ,000 1,078,000 1,443 1, , ,000 1,369,000 1,832 1, , ,000 1,660,000 2,222 1, , ,000 1,951,000 2,611 1,990 A review of water supply data for the CCSA yields a ratio of 2.18:1 for maximum day demand to average day demand, while the peak hour ratio is 4.2:1. These ratios are higher than expected since ratios found in other parts of the system were 2:1 for maximum day and 3.2:1 for peak hour. VI. ALTERNATIVES A. ALTERNATIVE 1 NO ACTION TAKEN The option to take no action is not feasible for a number of reasons. The West Street pump station is currently out of compliance due to its inability to meet peak system demands with one of the pumps out of service. Additionally, due to the pumps being near the end of their useful design life, the scenario where one pump is out of service becomes more likely as time goes on. The Cramer Road tank in its current state is in need of structural repairs to the support columns as stated in the most recent tank inspection report. The tank also lacks sufficient storage to meet current system demands. MRB Group Project No Page 12

14 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Without significant improvements to the water system, specifically the West Street pump station and the Cramer Road tank, the Town is in danger of a catastrophic failure that could compromise the quality of water provided to the public. Furthermore, the deficiencies outlined above are having a detrimental effect on the ability of the Town to meet day-to-day requirements for both existing and future demands. In fact, the NYS Department of Health has issued a temporary moratorium on further expansion of the Town s water system until concrete actions are taken towards alleviation of these deficiencies, as shown in Appendix M. Therefore, the alternative to take no action is not feasible. B. ALTERNATIVE 2 - REPLACE PUMPS IN WEST STREET PUMPING STATION This alternative would consider replacing the pumps in the existing West Street pumping station with larger pumps capable of supplying future demands. Due to the pump station being at the low point in the system, the station experiences very high pressures on the pump discharge. The Hydraulic Analysis completed as part of the Water Master Plan indicates the maximum pressure experienced at the discharge of the pumping station is approximately 190 psi, which is approaching the max design pressure of the watermains in the distribution system at 200 psi. These high pressures limit the upgrade potential of the existing pumps without replacing a significant portion of the watermain in proximity to the pump station with higher pressure rated piping. Additionally, upgrading the pumps to meet future demands would further exacerbate the pressure loss experienced in the City of Canandaigua s transmission main while supplying the pumping station during peak demands. The costs associated with upgrading the pumps is roughly equivalent to the cost of the new pumps proposed in this report. However, the cost and time required to replace the watermain in the distribution system near the pump station would be excessive for an alternative that does not address all the major issues that currently exist. C. ALTERNATIVE 3 UPGRADED TO CRAMER ROAD TANK This alternative would consider upsizing the tank inlet/outlet line and repairs to the tank. The hydraulic analysis performed for the Water Master Plan found that increasing the size of the existing tank inlet/outlet line from 8 to 16 would reduce head loss currently experienced during peak demands. As a result, the new line would improve system pressure during high demand, increase design fire flows in the service area, and slightly reduce the tanks dead storage. MRB Group Project No Page 13

15 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Proposed repairs to the tank would be consistent with the recommendations outlined in the tank inspection report from 2016, including blasting and recoating, structural repairs to the interior support columns, and coating of the corroded areas. Although this alternative would resolve a few issues that are in need of immediate attention, it does not resolve the significant deficiency regarding lack of storage volume. VII. PROPOSED PROJECT A. PROJECT DESIGN The design criteria will be as outlined in Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten States Standards) and/or the requirements and approval conditions of the NYSDOH. The system will be designed for a minimum working pressure of 35 psi and a minimum fire flow of 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. 1. Booster Pumping Station A new booster pumping station is proposed with the intent to keep the existing West Street station as a backup supply. The recommended location to construct the proposed booster pumping station is on the City of Canandaigua Water Treatment Plant site, located near the tanks. The relatively constant water levels in the City s tanks would provide a more consistent suction head for the pumps and discharge pressures would be much lower than currently experienced in the West Street station. Utilizing the new station as the primary supply in place of the existing West Street station would reduce the impact on the City s distribution system by eliminating the pressures losses in the City transmission main due to flow to the station. Recommended Standards for Water Works requires that the pumping station be capable of supplying system demand when the Cramer Road tank is offline. In anticipation of the Town replacing the Cramer Road tank as outlined in Section VI.D, the pumping station will be required to meet Peak Hourly/Fire Flow demands for the year 2050, which is 1,990 gpm in Table IV.3. A three-pump station is proposed to meet these demands. The design is based on using vertical turbine pumps; two pumps providing peak hourly flow with the third for redundancy. The design point for each pump is 1,010 gpm at 419-feet, which provides a total flow from the station with two pumps running of 2,020 gpm utilizing 150 HP motors. When equipped with high MRB Group Project No Page 14

16 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 efficiency motors, the vertical turbine pumps area capable of pumping efficiencies up to 82% +/-. A space for a fourth pump may be provided due to the variance in anticipated peak hour flows in year The proposed location on the City of Canandaigua Water Treatment Plant site will provide a more consistent suction head on the pumps due to the close proximity to the City s tanks and the relatively stable water levels within the tanks. Additionally, moving from the current location on West Street will eliminate the low pressures in the City s distribution system and points further north caused by the West Street station during peak demands. The City of Canandaigua concurs with this course of action, as shown in Appendix L. In addition to high efficiency motors, the pumps will be operated by variable frequency drives (VFDs) to further increase efficiency. The pump station will be designed to be energy efficient using LED lighting and HVAC systems more efficient than current local building code requirements. 2. Transmission Main A new transmission main will be installed to connect the proposed pump station to the distribution system and will consist of two sections. The first section will be a new 16 transmission main from the proposed pump station on the City tank site to Middle Cheshire Road where it will connect to the existing 12 watermain. The second section will be a new 12 transmission main from the connection at Middle Cheshire Road to Nott Road, acting as a parallel main to the existing 12 watermain. Hydraulically, the new 12 transmission main combined with the existing parallel 12 watermain along Middle Cheshire Road will be capable of transmitting the flow from the new 16 transmission main. The proposed alignment for the 16 section of the transmission main passes through two properties between the pumping station and Middle Cheshire Road, both properties being owned by the Town, thus eliminating the need for easements. The 12 transmission main along Middle Cheshire Road to Nott Road will be installed primarily within the Town s right-of-way, although select easements may be required depending on site constraints. MRB Group Project No Page 15

17 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January Cramer Road Tank The Cramer Road tank is to be replaced with two identical 50 tall, 60 diameter tanks with a total storage volume of approximately 2.0 MG. The new tanks will be constructed such that both floors will be at the same elevation. The installation of two identical tanks at the same elevation provides for redundancy allowing the proposed pumping station to fill the tanks with less intensive demands. The booster station would be designed to meet maximum day demands rather than peak hourly demands, reducing the horsepower requirements and potentially the number of pumps overall. The design points for the pumps consider peak hourly flow in year 2030 and maximum daily demand in year As part of the tank replacement, the existing 8 combination inlet/outlet pipe to the tanks would be replaced with separate 12 fill and 12 discharge lines. The two lines provide redundant connections to the storage tanks and will reduce the demand on the pumping station by reducing head loss in the pipe under current and future peak demands. 4. Disinfection Byproducts It is proposed that each new tank on the City s site be installed with a mixing system to aid in the removal of THMs. The existing tank utilizes a mixing system to control THMs in the distribution system and installing new tanks provides the opportunity to install a higher efficiency system with better THM removal. 5. Hydraulic Calculations A Hydraulic Calculations memorandum is included in Appendix I. B. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE Table VI.1 represents the preliminary project cost estimate that is inclusive of all construction, engineering, administrative, and incidental costs including mobilization/demobilization, fittings, etc. A more detailed cost estimate can be found in Appendix J. MRB Group Project No Page 16

18 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Table VII.1: Summary - Project Cost Estimate Project Component Cost Pumping Station $1,310,750 Pump Station Electrical Service $625,000 Transmission Main $515,500 Cramer Road Tanks $2,708,500 Cramer Road Tank Supply Line $191,925 General Conditions/Mobilization $216,000 Subtotal Construction Cost $5,568,000 Contingency (10%) $557,000 Total Construction $6,125,000 Engineering, Legal, Admin. (20%) $1,225,000 Total Project Costs $7,350,000 C. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET The Town of Canandaigua s annual water budget from 2017 is $953, Revenue The Town generates their revenue through quarterly billing based on usage and service size. A typical resident with a 1 water service within the CCWD is charged at the following rate: Minimum Quarterly Charge (0-10,000 gallons) - $42.30 Additional Cost over 10,000 - $4.87 per 1,000 gallons A typical resident s average annual cost for water assuming a usage of 50,000 gallons per year is $ Operation and Maintenance The Town charges an Operation and Maintenance fee to each resident within a water district at a rate specific to each district or extension. The 2018 tax rate for the CCWD is $ per $1000 assessed value. MRB Group Project No Page 17

19 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 D. SHORT-LIVED ASSETS The proposed project involves mostly infrastructure with long-term lifespans designed for a minimum of 40 years. All short-lives assets have been included in the Town s Operation and Maintenance budget. Short-term assets for the project include the following: Pumps & pump motors Pump controls Storage tank cathodic protection Telemetry (level sensors, flow meter, etc.) Tank mixing system for TTHM removal Chlorination Equipment E. INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT The Town of Canandaigua has an existing intermunicipal agreement with Ontario County related to the use of the Cramer Road tank site. An intermunicipal agreement between the Town of Canandaigua and the City of Canandaigua will be required in order to locate the Town s proposed infrastructure on City property. The agreement may include a long-term renewable lease of the land needed for the pump station and a utility easement for the electric service and transmission main. An access and/or shared maintenance agreement may be utilized for the access road to the pump station. Portions of the transmission main will be installed on Town owned property along Middle Cheshire Road and should be located within a utility easement. VIII. USER COST ANALYSIS A. FUNDING ASSISTANCE The project appears to qualify for grant funding through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Water Infrastructure Improvements Act (WIIA). Grant funding is limited to the lesser of $3 million or 60% of net eligible project costs. The Town will apply for grant funding up to the $3 million limit in the upcoming 2018 round. The user cost analysis will be calculated under the scenario of receiving the full $3 million in grant funds as well as the scenario where no funds are received. MRB Group Project No Page 18

20 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 B. DEBT SERVICE The remaining project cost minus grant funding received will be financed through an Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) DWSRF loan. The loan financed through the DWSRF will be reimbursed through a debt service charge to the users within the benefited districts, which are the Canandaigua Consolidated Water District and its extensions, the Canandaigua-Hopewell Water District, and the Canandaigua-Bristol Water District. The method used for reimbursement of the debt will be an Ad Valorem Charge Program which is used to distribute the debt for the construction of the improvements to all the users in the benefited districts based on assessed valuation of their property. Table VII.1 represents a summary of the Ad Valorem Charge Program for this project under the scenario of the Town receiving the full $3 million in requested grant funds as well as the scenario in which the Town receives no grant funding. Table VIII.1: Projected Annual Debt Service Charge Projected Annual Debt Service Charge Total Construction Cost $7,350,000 $7,000,000 Grants Received $3,000,000 $0 Total Amount Financed $4,350,000 $7,000,000 Annual Debt Payment (30 5%) $282,974 $478,128 Total Assessed Value $854,182,208 $854,182,208 Debt Service (per $1,000 Assessed Value) $0.33 $0.56 Average Residential Assessed Value $289,663 $289,663 Annual Debt Service Charge $95.96 $ C. ANNUAL WATER CHARGE The total cost for water on an annual basis is comprised of three components; the debt service charge, the operations and maintenance charge outlined in Section VII.C.2, and the water commodity charge outlined in Section VII.C.1. A summary of the total annual water charge is shown in Table VIII.2 below. MRB Group Project No Page 19

21 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 Table VIII.2: Total Annual Water Charge Total Annual Water Charge $3 Million in Grant Funding No Grant Funding Debt Service Charge $95.96 $ O&M Charge $ $ Water Commodity Charge $ $ Total Annual Water Charge $ $ MRB Group Project No Page 20

22

23 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX A LOCATION MAP MRB Group Project No

24 CITY OF CANANDAIGUA TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA BOOSTER PUMPING STATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone:

25 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX B CITY TANK SITE AND TRANSMISSION MAIN CONCEPT MRB Group Project No

26 Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK CITY TANK SITE - CONCEPT B

27 Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK TRANSMISSION MAIN - CONCEPT B

28 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX C CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE - CONCEPT MRB Group Project No

29 Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE - CONCEPT 1 C

30 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPS MRB Group Project No

31 Booster Pump Station & Transmission Main January 15, :9, mi km Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Author: DAH Not a legal document

32 Cramer Road Tank Site January 15, :9, mi km Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Author: DAH Not a legal document

33 Booster Pump Station & Transmission Main January 15, :9, mi km Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Author: DAH Not a legal document

34 Cramer Road Tank Site January 15, :9, mi km Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Author: DAH Not a legal document

35 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX E STATE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION OFFICE (SHPO) MAPS MRB Group Project No

36 BOOSTER PUMPING STATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone:

37 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX F AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT MAP MRB Group Project No

38 TRANSMISSION MAIN BOOSTER PUMPING STATION CRAMER ROAD TANK SITE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK Engineering, Architecture & Surveying, D.P.C. The Culver Road Armory, 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Phone:

39 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX G FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) PART 1 MRB Group Project No

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX H CRAMER ROAD TANK INSPECTION REPORT MRB Group Project No

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX I HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS MRB Group Project No

79 TO: COPY: FROM: New York State Department of Health Town of Canandaigua MEMORANDUM DATE: April 25, 2018 MRB GROUP PROJECT NO: RE: TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA WATER BOOSTER STATION, TRANSMISSION MAIN, & STORAGE TANKS SUMMARY HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS for the TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA WATER BOOSTER STATION, TRANSMISSION MAIN, & STORAGE TANKS n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

80 n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx MEMORANDUM

81 I. BACKGROUND & PURPOSE MEMORANDUM MRB Group performed a hydraulic evaluation to determine the benefit of the proposed improvements to the Town of Canandaigua s water system. The Preliminary Engineering Report provides a more complete description of the improvements, which include a new water booster station, a new transmission main, and new water storage tanks. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. DESIGN FLOW Design Flow (listed in the following tables) is the flow available at a point in the system when the minimum system pressure is 20 psi during the demand. Design flows were reviewed under average and maximum day demands based on the existing system. Design flow was also evaluated with the proposed improvements under maximum day demands. Results listed in the following tables also include Available Flow at Fire Hydrant. This result represents the available flow when the pressure is 20 psi at the listed Fire Hydrant. Please note that the Available Flow at Fire Hydrant may result in negative system pressures as indicated in the tables. The more restrictive Design Flow is utilized for determining the available fire flow of the system. 1. Average Day Demand Three scenarios were run to determine the range in design flow during differing system conditions. Under the first scenario, system demands equaled average day demands, Pierce Park pump station, which supplies the Canandaigua-Bristol Water District, was pumping at 14 gpm, the Cramer Road Tank was at 28.3-feet, and the West Street pump station is off. Table II.3 summarizes the hydraulic modeling results at various hydrant locations in the system. The results represent normal operating conditions. The table identifies the available fire flow at the hydrants while maintaining a minimum system pressure of 20 psi. In most n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

82 MEMORANDUM cases, the minimum system pressure occurs at junction J-2124, which is a high point in the near 5615 Nott Road. Design Flows within the service area are above 900 gpm. Table II.1: Existing Average Day Flow Hydrant Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F HYD-083F HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F J HYD-xx1F J The second scenario contemplated the impact on the system while the Pierce Park pump station was filling the Day Road tank during peak, average day demands (demand ratio of 2.41). The Day Road tank is located in the Canandaigua-Bristol Water District. Under this scenario, Pierce Park was pumping at 187 gpm, West Street pump station was off, and the Cramer Road tank was at 28.2-feet and falling. Model results (Table II.2) found a significant effect on design flow with flows reduced on average by 560 gpm. Resultant flows in the service area were above 500 gpm. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

83 MEMORANDUM Table II.2: Existing Average Day, Day Road Tank Filling Flow Hydrant Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F J HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F J HYD-xx1F J Turing on the West Street pump station while the Day Road tank fills improves available fire flows. Under this scenario the Pierce Park Pump station was pumping at 177 gpm, West Street supplied 576 gpm with one pump operating, and Cramer Road tank was low at 26.3 feet and falling. The Average Day demand ratio was On average, design flows increased by 234 gpm over the first scenario. Design flows were above 1000 gpm. Results are included in Table II.3. Table II.3: Existing Average Day, West Street On Flow Hydrant CENTRAL ZONE Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F HYD-083F HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F HYD-349F HYD-xx1F J n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

84 MEMORANDUM 2. Max Day Demand Three scenarios were run to determine the impact of maximum day demands on the system. Under the first scenario, system demands for the Canandaigua Consolidated service area were provided only by the Cramer road tank. Analysis was performed when the average day ratio was 2.89, the Pierce Park pump station was filling the Day Road tank, and the West Street pump station was off. Table II.4 shows that under this condition that design flows drop to below 380 gpm. Table II.4: Existing Maximum Day Flow Hydrant Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F J HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F J HYD-xx1F J Under the second scenario, system demands were provided by both the Cramer Road tank and one pump in the West Street pump station, Pierce Park was filling the Day Road tank, and the average day demand ratio was 3.04, indicating that system demands were essentially at peak hour demand. Adding one pump at West Street increased design flows to above 900 gpm. Results are included in Table II.5. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

85 MEMORANDUM Table II.5: Existing Maximum Day with One Pump Flow Hydrant CENTRAL ZONE Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F J HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F J HYD-xx1F J The final scenario contemplated water supply from both the Cramer Road tank supplemented by two pumps operating at the West Street pump station. As with the other scenarios, the Pierce Park pump station was filling the Day Road tank. The demand ratio for this scenario was Allowing both pumps to operate increases the system design flows to over 1,000 gpm. Results are included in Table II.6. Table II.6: Existing Maximum Day with Two Pumps Flow Hydrant CENTRAL ZONE Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) HYD-080F J HYD-083F HYD-083F HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F HYD-349F HYD-xx1F HYD-XX1F n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

86 MEMORANDUM 3. Cramer Road Supply Line Review of the system under maximum day demands found high head losses in the Cramer Road tank supply line. The supply line includes 1,475-feet of 12-inch PVC pipe along Cramer Road, and 1,350-feet of 8-inch AC pipe that runs from Cramer Road to the tank. Head loss in the line can exceed 30.6-feet when the tank is draining with most of the loss in the 8-inch pipe (~26.4-feet). Adding a single pump at the West Street pump station reduces flow from the tank reducing head loss to 26-feet (~11.4 psi). Adding the second pump at West Street provides additional improvement, reducing the head loss to 11-feet (~4.8 psi). It is apparent from results that the 8-inch line to the tank is undersized for the anticipated flows during maximum day demands, peak demand, and fire demands. Head loss caused by the 8-inch pipe effectively reduces system pressures and firefighting design flows. B. SYSTEM PRESSURES System pressures are a function of system demands, water level in the Cramer Road tank, and pump station operation. Table II.7 lists anticipated pressure ranges for system high points, low points, and at an average elevation in the service area. High system pressure (Max. Value) occurs during minimum system demands while both pumps in the West Street pump station are operating, the Pierce Park pump station is OFF and Cramer Road tank is near it high operating point. Low system pressures (Min. Value) occur during peak demands, when the West Street Pump Station is OFF, Pierce Park pump station is filling the Day Road tank, and the Cramer Road tank is at its lowest operating level. Average pressures occur during average day demands Nott Road is the highest point in the existing system. The intersection of Woolhouse and Rossier Roads will be the highest point when the associated water district is complete. The lowest point in the system is at the West Street pump station Hopkins Rd is representative of the average elevation in the system. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

87 MEMORANDUM Table II.7: Central Zone Pressure Location Elevation (feet) Max. Value (psi) Min. Value (psi) Average (psi) West Street Pump Station Hopkins Rd Nott Rd 1, Woolhouse & Rossier Roads 1, III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. DESIGN FLOW Table III.1 demonstrates the benefit of installing a 12-inch supply line to the Cramer Road tank. Comparing to Table II.1 shows that increasing the pipe size results in design flows that are, on average, 137 gpm greater than the anticipated flows under average day conditions. Head loss in the modified supply line is 8.23 feet (~3.6 psi) during peak demands. The head loss with a 760 gpm fire demand is 21.7 feet (~9.4 psi). Review of the system determined that increasing the supply line to the Cramer Road tank from 8-inch to 12-inch improves system pressure and design flows. Table III.1: Proposed Maximum Day 12-Inch Supply Line Flow Hydrant Total Demand (gpm) Available Flow at Hydrant (gpm) Critical Node ID Critical Node Pressure (psi) Critical Node Head (ft) Design Flow (gpm) Design Pressure (psi) Fire Node Pressure (psi) Static Pressure (psi) CENTRAL ZONE HYD-080F J HYD-083F HYD-083F HYD-094F J HYD-109F J HYD-110F J HYD-201F J HYD-230F J HYD-349F HYD-349F HYD-xx1F J n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

88 MEMORANDUM B. PRESSURE The proposed tanks at Cramer Road will be installed at the same floor elevation as the current tank. Due to their increased height, anticipated static pressures within the service area will increase by 3-5 psi. IV. STORAGE - CRAMER ROAD TANK A. STORAGE VOLUMES Tank storage volume contains six volume components that include: 1. Operating Storage (OS) volume between pump on and off levels. 2. Equalizing Storage (ES) volume between pump on level and the level needed to maintain a system pressure of 35 psi. 3. Standby Storage (SB) volume needed to provide water during an emergency such as a water main break; typically, the volume between the levels needed to maintain system pressures of 35 psi and 20 psi. 4. Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) volume between equalization storage and the level needed to maintain 20 psi system pressure 5. Dead Storage (DS) volume between the level needed to maintain a system pressure of 20 psi and the tank outlet. Ideally, this volume should be zero in order to minimize tank volume and maintain water quality. 6. Headspace (HS) volume available between the pump off level and the level of the overflow B. EXISTING TANK Due to a high point in the system near 5615 Nott Road, the operating volumes of the Cramer Road tank are limited. Under peak hour conditions, the pressure at the high point drops to ~30 psi, the rest of the system is above 35 psi. Because of this, the tank does not contain ES; the pump off level equals the level needed to maintain 35 psi in the rest of the system. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

89 MEMORANDUM Analysis of the tank also considered a proposed water district on Woolhouse and Rossier Roads. When completed, the intersection of the two roads becomes the high point of the system. Under peak hour demands, the projected pressure at the intersection is ~21 psi. This low pressure results in minimal SB, ~151,000 gallons. Table IV.1: Cramer Road Tank Needed Storage Volume Existing Minimum Maximum Operating Storage (OS) 236, , ,404 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 150, , ,301 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) as ES+SB Equalizing Storage (ES) - 128, ,700 Standby Storage (SB) 150, , ,309 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 150, , ,009 Dead Storage (DS) 990, Head Space (HS) 129,157 21,526 43,052 Total Volume = OS + FSS + DS + HS 1,506, , ,757 Total Volume = OS + ES + SB + DS + HS 1,506, , ,465 Table IV.1 lists maximum and minimum needed storage volumes with a total needed storage ranging from 622,000 gallons to 948,000 gallons. The volume of the existing tank (discounting dead storage) is 517,000 gallons. Therefore, the existing tank is undersized for existing system demands. Listed needed volumes do not include dead storage since excess storage is discouraged. The needed volumes can be provided by an elevated storage tank. Utilizing a standpipe introduces dead storage resulting in a tank with total volume ranging from 1.61 million gallons to over 1.83 million gallons. The proposed tanks are standpipes since they are a more cost effective option when compared to elevated storage. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

90 MEMORANDUM Review of the Cramer Road tank determined that it does not provide the needed storage for the service area based on current demands. Storage volume is limited by existing and proposed high points in the system. Volume is further limited by head loss during high flows in the tank s supply line. C. PROPOSED TANKS Normally the pressure on Nott Road is ~42 psi, trending toward 35 psi during maximum day demands. Analysis of the distribution system found that pressure losses due to flow in the supply line to the Cramer Road tank can be significant with losses over 30-feet (~13.2 psi) during peak demands. Tank volumes shown in Table IV.1 account for this loss. The hydraulic analysis also found that providing a 12-inch supply line from the tank to the system reduces line losses to 8.2-feet (~3.6 psi) during peak demands. Table IV.2 compares Cramer Road tank storage volume under existing conditions to the tank with a 12-inch supply line. As the table shows, the increased supply line increases FSS, ES and SB; it also decreases DS. Table IV.2: Cramer Tank with 12-inch Supply Existing Existing Storage Volume w/8 w/12" Operating Storage (OS) 236, ,788 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 150,683 1,118,501 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) as ES + SB Equalizing Storage (ES) - 3,014 Standby Storage (SB) 150,683 1,115,487 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 150,683 1,118,501 Dead Storage (DS) 990,205 22,387 Head Space (HS) 129, ,157 Total Volume = OS + FSS + DS + HS 1,506,833 1,506,833 Total Volume = OS + ES + SB + DS + HS 1,506,833 1,506,833 n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

91 MEMORANDUM Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. summarizes the estimated storage volume needed in the service area by year Comparing the table to Table IV.1, shows that as system demand increases that needed SB storage becomes more significant than FSS. Listed volumes in Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. are based on additional flow from a future supply pump station designed to provide year 2050 maximum day demands and increased demand at the Pierce Park pump station. The larger pumps help reduce storage volumes. Table IV.3: Cramer Road Tank Needed Storage Volume Minimum Maximum Operating Storage (OS) 357, ,525 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 185, ,101 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) as ES+SB Equalizing Storage (ES) 154,695 54,195 Standby Storage (SB) 1,036,618 1,036,618 Fire Suppression Storage (FSS) 1,091,313 1,091,313 Dead Storage (DS) 0 0 Head Space (HS) 21,526 43,052 Total Volume = OS + FSS + DS + HS 564,033 98,678 Total Volume = OS + ES + SB + DS + HS 1,570,233 1,710,890 V. CONCLUSION MRB Group performed a hydraulic review of the proposed improvements outlined in the Preliminary Engineering Report and determined that the proposed transmission improvements and tank modifications provide an overall benefit to the system by increasing Design Flow and available storage. Results shown are based on water supply from the tank only. The proposed pump station improves the system by providing a station with redundant pump as required by the Department of Health. n:\ \reports\hydraulic analysis\dah_hydraulic memo (dca edits).docx

92 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX J COST ESTIMATE MRB Group Project No

93 Town of Canandaigua - PER Project Cost Estimate D. Herman 2/2/2018 Construction Cost Items Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Pump Station Pump Building 650 SF $ $162,500 Pumps/Piping/Misc 1 LS $475,000 $475,000 HVAC 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 Generator 1 LS $200,000 $200,000 Excavation and Backfill 200 CY $100 $20,000 Structural Fill 150 CY $75 $11,250 Security 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 Telemetry/SCADA 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 16" Class 350 DIP 250 LF $100 $25,000 16" Gate Valve 2 EA $15,000 $30,000 Connect to Existing 2 EA $7,500 $15,000 Paved Drive - Plant to Pump Station (Town Forces) 50,000 SF $3 $125,000 Site Pavement 700 SF $10 $7,000 Site Demolition 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Clearing/Grubbing & Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 Erosion & Sediment Control 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Fencing & Automatic Gate 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 Chlorination System 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 Pump Station Electric Service Electric Service from CR 16: 3,000 LF 3P, Pole Change, 100 LF primary, and 500 KVA Transformer 1 LS $450,000 $450,000 Electrical Distribution 1 LS $175,000 $175,000 Transmission Main 16" PVC Watermain 2,200 LF $40 $88,000 16" Installation 2,200 LF $15 $33,000 20" HDPE Directional Drill 1,000 LF $250 $250,000 12" PVC Watermain 1,100 LF $20 $22,000 12" Installation 1,100 LF $15 $16,500 12" Gate Valve 4 EA $2,500 $10,000 16" Gate Valve 2 EA $15,000 $30,000 Hydrants 2 EA $5,000 $10,000 Connect to Existing 12" Watermain 2 EA $7,500 $15,000 Erosion and Sediment Control 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Driveway Restoration 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Lawn Restoration 1,000 LF $1 $1,000 Cramer Tank Supply Line 16" PVC Watermain 1,525 LF $30 $45,750 16" Installation 1,525 LF $15 $22,875 12" PVC Watermain 200 LF $30 $6,000 12" PVC Installation 200 LF $15 $3,000 16" Gate Valve 2 EA $15,000 $30,000 12" Gate Valve 10 EA $2,500 $25,000 Connect to Existing 12" Watermain 1 EA $7,500 $7,500 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Restoration 900 LF $2 $1,800

94 Town of Canandaigua - PER Project Cost Estimate D. Herman 2/2/2018 Pavement Restoration (900 LF x 5 FT) 4,500 SF $10 $45,000 Cramer Tanks 1.0 MG Tanks 2 EA $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Tank Demo 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 Site Work 1 LS $75,000 $75,000 Telemetry 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 Fencing 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 THM Removal and Mixing System 2 EA $105,000 $210,000 Tank Drains and Foundation Drains 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Site Demolition 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Gravel Drive 2,700 SF $5 $13,500 Site Grading and Restoration 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Valve Vault Building (200 SF) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 HVAC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Cramer Tanks Electrical Service Electric service and extension to valve vault and tanks 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 General Conditions (2%) 1 LS $108,000 $108,000 Mobilization (2%) 1 LS $108,000 $108,000 Subtotal Construction Cost Contingency (10%) Total Construction Engineering, Legal and Admin. (20%) $5,568,000 $557,000 $6,125,000 $1,225,000 Total Project Costs $7,350,000

95 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX K INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT WITH ONTARIO COUNTY MRB Group Project No

96

97

98

99 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX L CITY OF CANANDAIGUA LETTER OF SUPPORT MRB Group Project No

100

101 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX M NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CORRESPONDENCE MRB Group Project No

102

103

104 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX N TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA WATER SERVICE MAP MRB Group Project No

105 Murray Rd CR 2 Mertz Rd Hadsell Rd Ganyard Hill Rd Smith Rd Smith Rd SR 21 CR 41 VILLAGE OF MANCHESTER SR 332 Payne Rd SR 444 TOWN OF VICTOR Cherry St CR 8 Canandaigua Farmington Townline Rd TOWN OF FARMINGTON CR 28 Shortsville Rd TOWN OF MANCHESTER Stirnie Rd CR 39 CR 40 Bloomfield Water District 2 Extension 1 Main St Oakmount Rd Boughton Rd VILLAGE OF BLOOMFIELD SR 5 & 20 Gauss Rd % Flatiron Rd Rice Rd Woolston Rd Pond Rd TOWN OF EAST BLOOMFIELD Whalen Rd SR 5 & 20 % SR 64 S Brace Rd Wheeler Station Rd New Michigan Rd Canandaigua Consolidated Water District Extension 31 CR 30 Mccann Rd East Bloomfield Water District 2 Hopkins-Grimble and County Road 32 Water District Canandaigua Consolidated Water District Extension 41 Hopkins Rd % % Canandaigua Consolidated Water District Extension 36 N Bloomfield Rd Cooley Rd Thomas Rd Hickox Rd % Brickyard Rd % Yerkes Rd Buffalo St Extension Bliss Rd SR 21 Rochester Rd Risser Rd Canandaigua-Farmington Water District Airport Rd % SR 5 & 20 North Road and Andrews Road Water District Extension Sand Hill Rd Canandaigua Consolidated Water District Extension 30 % CITY OF CANANDAIGUA The Hammocks Water District S Main St North Rd East St Canandaigua-Hopewell Water District % % % % Eastern Blvd Emerson-Allen-Townline Road Water District Extension Emerson Rd Chapin Rd % Lakeshore Dr County Road 10 CR 4 TOWN OF HOPEWELL CR 46 SR 5 & 20 Fisher Hill Rd % Baptist Hill Rd Tilton Rd Vincent Hill Rd SR 64 CR 32 Woolhouse Rd Canandaigua Consolidated Water District Hickox Road Watermain Extension 38 % Nott Rd West Lake Boulevard Water District Extension Beecher Tract Water District Extension Turner Rd CR 18 Gregg Rd Elm Tree Rd US 20A Lee Rd Bristol Water District 1 Kear Rd Nott Road Water District Extension 40 Goodale Rd Canandaigua-Bristol Water District TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA Rossier Rd Deuel Rd Cramer Rd Middle Cheshire Rd Wells Curtice Rd CR 16 SR 364 CR 1 TOWN OF GORHAM Kipp Rd Lake To Lake Rd Logan Rd S Hill Rd TOWN OF BRISTOL Dugway Rd Goff Rd CR 11 Jones Rd Arnold Rd Green Rd Conklin Rd Twitchell Rd State Route 245 Town Line Rd Ferguson Corners Legend EXISTING WATER DISTRICT BEECHER TRACT WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION BLOOMFIELD WATER DISTRICT 2 EXTENSION 1 County Road 33 TOWN OF SOUTH BRISTOL BRISTOL WATER DISTRICT 1 CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT County Road 34 Stid Hill Rd Hicks Rd CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION 30 CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION 31 CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION 36 CANANDAIGUA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION 41 CANANDAIGUA-BRISTOL WATER DISTRICT Seneca Point Rd S Lake Rd E Lake Rd TOWN OF MIDDLESEX Bare Hill Rd CANANDAIGUA-FARMINGTON WATER DISTRICT CANANDAIGUA-HOPEWELL WATER DISTRICT EAST BLOOMFIELD WATER DISTRICT 2 EMERSON-ALLEN-TOWNLINE ROAD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION S Vine Valley Rd HICKOX ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION 38 N Vine Valley Rd HOPKINS-GRIMBLE AND COUNTY ROAD 32 WATER DISTRICT State Route 245 Dunton Rd Bagley Rd NORTH ROAD AND ANDREWS ROAD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION NOTT ROAD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION 40 THE HAMMOCKS WATER DISTRICT WEST LAKE BOULEVARD WATER DISTRICT EXTENSION MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY State Route SHEET NO. FIG. 1 Document Path: N:\ \dwg\Water_Districts_Consolidated.mxd MRB group Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, D.P.C. 145 Culver Road, Suite 160, Rochester, New York Tel Fax Drawn By: Scale: Date: T J V 1 " = 6, " x 1 7 " M A R TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK EXISTING WATER DISTRICTS 2018 MRB Group

106 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX O CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION FROM MRB Group Project No

107 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, 2018 CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TECHNICAL, MANAGERIAL, AND FINANCIAL EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR: COMMUNITY PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS SYSTEM NAME: Canandaigua Consolidated water district COUNTY: Ontario PWSID #: ny COMPLETED BY: Jim Fletcher DATE: 4/18/18 A. System Infrastructure Technical Capacity 1. Does the system have as-built plans, drawings, or maps of its facilities including source, treatment, storage, and distribution? x Yes No Not Applicable If the system lacks certain plans, please specify: 2. Does the system have exact location measurements of all main valves and service shutoffs? x Yes No Not Applicable 3. Can the system s pumping, storage and distribution facilities meet current normal and peak demands and required distribution pressures? Yes No Not Applicable 4. Does the system have a water conservation plan? x x Yes No Not Applicable 5. Are all customers on the water system metered? x Yes No Not Applicable 6. Is the system equipped with master meters that measure the amount of water the system produces or purchases for each source of water? Yes No Not Applicable x 8

108 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, 2018 B. Source Water Evaluation 1. Does the system have a copy of its Source Water Assessment? Yes No Not Applicable x 2. Has a yield analysis been done for the system s source? Yes No Not Applicable 3. Does the system have a description of the existing source-pumping capacity and the system s raw and finished water storage capacity? Yes No Not Applicable 4. For groundwater systems, does your system have a wellhead protection program in place? C. Technical Knowledge Yes No Not Applicable 1. Has an evaluation of the water system facilities been conducted with respect to its ability to reliably meet current and proposed State and Federal drinking water regulations? x x x x Yes No Not Applicable If system can t meet regulations, please specify: 2. Does the system have monthly water production records or treatment records that show daily and monthly water production for each source used by the system? x Yes No Not Applicable 3. Has an evaluation been conducted to document the condition and remaining service life of existing facilities? x Yes No Not Applicable 4. Has the system been cited within the past two years for failing to sample and report test results? x Yes No Not Applicable 5. Has the system been cited within the past two years for operating deficiencies as a result of a sanitary survey or other inspection conducted by the DOH? Yes No Not Applicable 9

109 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, If you answered Yes to Questions 4 or 5, has corrective action been taken to correct all deficiencies? D. Certified Operators Yes No Not Applicable 1. Does the water system have a certified water operator(s) and designated an operator in responsible charge? x Yes No 2. If the water system does not have a state-certified water treatment operator, or lacks the necessary number of operators to safely and reliably operate the system, does the system have a plan to acquire the services of a (additional) state-certified operator? Yes No Not Applicable x A. Staffing and Organization Managerial Capacity 1. What type of training/continuing education did system personnel attend within the last two years (please specify)? Finger Lakes rural water training 2. Who is responsible for policy and operational decisions for the water system (name and title)? James Fletcher Water superintendent 3. Who is responsible for ensuring compliance with state regulatory requirements (name and title)? James Fletcher Water Superintendent 4. Who is responsible for approving expenditures (name and title)? Canandaigua town board 5. For systems that contract for system operation or management: Does the system have a valid (signed) contract that summarizes the duties and responsibilities the contractor must provide to the system? Yes No Not Applicable x 10

110 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, 2018 B. Ownership 1. If the system is under temporary ownership, has a future owner been found for the water system? Yes No Not Applicable If Yes, who will the future owner be? 2. For systems that use, but do not own, land or facilities that are essential to water system operation: Is there a valid long-term contract (i.e., lease) between the water system and the owner of the land or facilities essential to the operation of the system? Yes No Not Applicable 3. For systems with a single proprietor: Does the system have a contingency plan for continuing system operation in the event the owner becomes incapable of carrying out his/her responsibilities? C. Consolidation/Restructuring Yes No Not Applicable 1. Has the system examined the feasibility of: a) Incorporating with an existing water system in the immediate proximity? Yes No Not Applicable b) Selling ownership to an existing water system? x x Yes No Not Applicable x x x c) Contracting for the management or operation of the system with an existing system or satellite management/operations agency? D. Emergency/Disaster Response Plans Yes No Not Applicable 1. Has the system developed an Emergency Response Plan? x Yes No Not Applicable 2. Does the Emergency Response Plan: x a) Designate responsible personnel in the event of an emergency? x Yes No Not Applicable 11

111 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, 2018 b) Provide for emergency phone and radio capabilities? x Yes No Not Applicable c) Describe public and health department notification procedures? x Yes No Not Applicable 3. Does the system have any emergency contract agreements under which it operates (e.g., emergency water interconnections and alternative sources)? x Yes No Not Applicable E. Water System Policies 1. Does the system have a written System Operations Manual or Policy? F. Record Keeping Yes No Not Applicable 1. Does the system keep water utility records including: financial, regulatory, facility, operations and maintenance, data quality, Annual Water Quality Reports, and correspondence with the NYS Department of Health and/or local Health Departments (and where appropriate, the NYSPSC)? x Yes No Not Applicable Financial Capacity A. Budget Projection Revenues and Expenses 1. Does the system have a water budget? x Yes No Not Applicable 2. Are the system s annual water revenues sufficient to cover the annual water expenses as well as anticipated capital improvements? x Yes No Not Applicable 3. Are the system s water rates, when combined with other revenue sources, sufficient to cover all listed expenditures for the water system? x Yes No Not Applicable 12

112 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, Does the system retain budget information for at least two years? x Yes No Not Applicable B. Reserves 1. Does the system have a reserve account (or funds within a reserve account) dedicated to: a) Financing the emergency replacement of critical facilities in the event of their failure? x Yes No Not Applicable b) The maintenance of cash flow in the event of an unexpected funding shortfall? x Yes No Not Applicable 2. If the system has a reserve account, how does it determine the amount to put into the account? Fixed Amount Percentage of Revenues Percentage of Expenses Other xx (please specify) Per town reserve fund policy 3. If the system has a reserve account, what type(s) of reserve account(s) does it have? Operation x and Maintenance Capital Projects Debt Service Other (please specify) C. Capital Improvement Plan 1. How do you finance operation and maintenance costs (Check all that apply)? Rates x collected from ratepayers Rental fees Other business revenue Personal capital Surcharges Reserve x account Other x (Please specify) Operation and Maintenance assets value on property 2. How did you finance your LAST major repair or improvement? Commercial x bank loan Bonds x DWSRF Other State or federal loan/grant program Surcharge Personal Capital Reserve x Account Revenue from other business Other (Please specify) 13

113 DWSRF Engineering Report Outline Appendix A: Capacity Development Form Effective April 1, What options do you have for financing your NEXT major repair or improvement? Commercial x bank loan Bonds x DWSRF Other x State or federal loan/grant program Surcharge Personal Capital Reserve x Account Revenue from other business Other (Please specify) D. Water System Rates 1. Does the water system management review user fee, user charge, or rate system at least once every two years? x Yes No Not Applicable 2. What is the frequency of billing (e.g., 12, 6, or 4 times per/year)? times/year 4 3. Where applicable, what are the system s water rates? 4. What are rates based on? Capital x Improvement Plan and Annual Budget Annual Budget Only Cash on Hand Last year s expenses Not sure Other x (Please specify ) Contract with supplier varies per year on amount purchased. 5. What was the date of the last rate increase? - 1/1/2018 END OF DOCUMENT 14

114 Preliminary Engineering Report Town of Canandaigua Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks January 2018 APPENDIX P SMART GROWTH ASSESSMENT FORM MRB Group Project No

115 Smart Growth Assessment Form This form should be completed by the applicant s project engineer or other design professional. 1 Applicant Information Applicant: Town of Canandaigua Project No.: Project Name: Water Booster Station, Transmission Main, & Storage Tanks Is project construction complete? Yes, date: No Project Summary: (provide a short project summary in plain language including the location of the area the project serves) Construction of a new pump station on the City tank site to replace exisitng pump station as the primary supply, construction of a new transmission watermain from the new pump station to Middle Cheshire Road, replacement of exisitng Cramer Road tank with new twin tanks. Section 1 Screening Questions 1. Prior Approvals 1A. Has the project been previously approved for EFC financial assistance? Yes No 1B. If so, what was the project number(s) for the prior Project No.: approval(s)? Is the scope of the project substantially the same as that which was approved? Yes No IF THE PROJECT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY EFC S BOARD AND THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT HAS NOT MATERIALLY CHANGED, THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO SMART GROWTH REVIEW. SKIP TO SIGNATURE BLOCK. 2. New or Expanded Infrastructure 2A. Does the project add new wastewater collection/new water mains or a Yes No new wastewater treatment system/water treatment plant? Note: A new infrastructure project adds wastewater collection/water mains or a wastewater treatment/water treatment plant where none existed previously 2B. Will the project result in either: Yes No An increase of the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permitted flow capacity for an existing treatment system; OR An increase such that a NYSDEC water withdrawal permit will need to be obtained or modified, or result in the NYSDOH approving an increase in the capacity of the water treatment plant? Note: An expanded infrastructure project results in an increase of the SPDES permitted flow capacity for the wastewater treatment system, or an increase of the permitted water withdrawal or the permitted flow capacity for the water treatment system. 1 If project construction is complete and the project was not previously financed through EFC, an authorized municipal representative may complete and sign this assessment. Page 1 Effective October 1, 2017

116 IF THE ANSWER IS NO TO BOTH 2A and 2B ON THE PREVIOUS PAGE, THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER SMART GROWTH REVIEW. SKIP TO SIGNATURE BLOCK. 3. Court or Administrative Consent Orders 3A. Is the project expressly required by a court or administrative consent Yes No order? 3B. If so, have you previously submitted the order to NYS EFC or DOH? Yes No If not, please attach. Section 2 Additional Information Needed for Relevant Smart Growth Criteria EFC has determined that the following smart growth criteria are relevant for EFC-funded projects and that projects must meet each of these criteria to the extent practicable: 1. Uses or Improves Existing Infrastructure 1A. Does the project use or improve existing infrastructure? Yes No Please describe: The proposed upgrades will continue to utilize the existing water distribution system and the upgrades will provide an improvement in both the quality and reliability of the water system. 2. Serves a Municipal Center Projects must serve an area in either 2A, 2B or 2C to the extent practicable. 2A. Does the project serve an area limited to one or more of the following municipal centers? i. A City or incorporated Village Yes No ii. A central business district Yes No iii. A main street Yes No iv. A downtown area Yes No v. A Brownfield Opportunity Area Yes No (for more information, go to & search Brownfield ) vi. A downtown area of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Area Yes No (for more information, go to and search Waterfront Revitalization ) vii. An area of transit-oriented development Yes No viii. An Environmental Justice Area Yes No (for more information, go to ix. A Hardship/Poverty Area Yes No Note: Projects that primarily serve census tracts and block numbering areas with a poverty rate of at least twenty percent according to the latest census data Please describe all selections: 2 of 3 Effective October 1, 2017

117