Global Efficient Lighting Centre. Shuming Hua 23 April 2014

Transcription

1 Global Efficient Lighting Centre Shuming Hua 23 April 2014

2 Global Efficient Lighting Centre Who is GELC What is our vision? Projects and activities

3 Creation of GELC NLTC become the Partner of UNEP/GEF en.lighten initiative and the member of Steering Committee 年 2011 年 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING was signed in Kenya, 2011 Opening Ceremony of GELC was hold on 31 Oct in Beijing

4 Our Vision Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

5 Projects and activities Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

6 Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Region Country Central America South America West Africa North Africa Middle East West Asia South Asia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Panama Chile Uruguay Guinea-Bissau Tunisia Lebanon Azerbaijan Tonga 86% of Samples identified as manufacturing Chinese

7 Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Safety test -IEC Interchangeability (Item 6) Protection against electric shock (Item7) Insulating resistance (Item 8.1) Electric strength (Item 8.2) Mechanical strength (Item 9) Resistance to flame and ignition (Item 12) Performance test - IEC Lamp Power Power factor Initial Lumen Flux Initial efficacy Color tolerance Color Rendering Index 2000hrs Lumen maintenance Mercury content test - IEC Format of Mercury Mercury content

8 Global CFL lamp quality checking Test 90% 60% 80% 70% 50% 60% 40% 50% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% Compliance batches Non-Compliance batches 0% Compliance countries Non-Compliance countries Compliance rate of Safety Test

9 Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Non-compliance of safety test items 9% Interchangeability Mechanical strength 36% 55% Protection against electric shock

10 Measured Power (W) Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Lamp power IEC Test results GB + GB Rated Power (W)

11 PF Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Power factor Test results ES EST AS/NZS EU GB Sample (Unit)

12 Efficacy (Lm/W) Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Efficacy 1) AS/NZS EU Energy Star Test results Lumen output (lm)

13 Efficacy (lm/w) Efficacy (lm/w) Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Efficacy 2) Test results EST Spiral Power (W) Test results EST Stick Power (W)

14 Efficacy (lm/w) Efficacy (lm/w) Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Efficacy 3) Test results GB RZ/RR Power (W) Test results GB warm light Power (W)

15 CRI SCDM Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Color Characteristic Test results Requirement Sample (Unit) Sample (Unit) Test results Requirement

16 Lumen Maintenance (%) Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Lumen Test results EST AS/NZS GB EU Sample (unit)

17 Global CFL lamp quality checking Test Mercury content 54% 52% 50% 48% 46% 44% 42% 53% Amalgam 47% Non-amalgam 30% 6% 2% 6% 0~1 mg 13% 36% 6% 1~1.5 mg 1.5~2.5 mg 2.5~3.5 mg 3.5~5 mg 5~10 mg 10~15 mg

18 Projects and activities Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

19 Laboratory Capacity Building APLAC Proficiency Testing program Establishment of Swedish national lighting laboratory IEA Inter-laboratory Comparison GELC Vietnam National Laboratory Training Round Robin Test With 4 Russian laboratories Tunisia National Laboratory cooperation

20 APLAC Proficiency Testing Program APLAC T088 APLAC Proficiency Testing Program Photometric measurement of Solid State Lighting Products organized by A total of 29 laboratories from 19 Accreditation Bodies enrolled in the program and 28 laboratories from 18 Accreditation Bodies returned results. Testing according to the ZT007-APLAC Proficiency Testing Program -Measurement Method for the Proficiency Testing Program (a) Total luminous flux (lm); (b) RMS Voltage (V) and Current (A); (c) Electrical active power (W) ; (d) Luminous efficacy (lm/w); (e) Chromaticity coordinates x, y; (f) Correlated Colour Temperature (K); (g) Colour Rendering Index (CRI) Ra; (h) Power factor (PF).

21 APLAC Proficiency Testing Program NLTC- IDC En number Total luminous flux 24 Voltage Current Power Number of Participants (Percentage) Luminous efficacy x y CCT Ra (89%) (71%) (100%) (68%) (78%) (85%) (88%) (88%) (96%) > Total NLTC- OD En number Total luminous flux 24 (92%) Voltage Current Power Number of Participants (Percentage) Luminous efficacy x y CCT Ra (96%) (78%) (100%) (96%) (96%) (100%) (100%) (100%) > Total NLTC-D 1.0 En number Total luminous flux 21 (81%) Voltage Current Power 26 (96%) 22 (81%) 26 (96%) Number of Participants (Percentage) Luminous efficacy 21 (81%) x y CCT Ra 25 (100%) 24 (96%) 25 (100%) 23 (96%) > Total Power Factor 28 (100%) Power Factor 21 (78%) Power Factor 25 (93%)

22 APLAC Proficiency Testing Program NLTC- HCCT En number Total luminous flux 22 (85%) Voltage Current Power Number of Participants (Percentage) Luminous efficacy x y CCT Ra (96%) (74%) (100%) (92%) (92%) (92%) (92%) (92%) > Total Power Factor 23 (85%) NLTC- LPF En number Total luminous flux 23 (88%) Voltage Current Power Number of Participants (Percentage) Luminous efficacy x y CCT Ra (96%) (70%) (78%) (92%) (92%) (100%) (100%) (100%) > Total Power Factor 23 (85%)

23 APLAC Proficiency Testing Program En number Number of Participants (Percentage) All type lamps Total luminous flux Voltage Current Power Luminous efficacy x y CCT Ra Power Factor (87%) 124 (91%) 110 (81%) 120 (88%) 115 (88%) 117 (93%) 120 (95%) 121 (96%) 117 (97%) 120 (88%) > Total % 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% Total luminous flux Voltage Current Power Lumious efficacy x y CCT Ra Power factor

24 IEA Inter-laboratory Comparison The IC was designed in compliance with ISO/IEC 17043:2010, Conformity Assessment General Requirements for Proficiency Testing 14 laboratories participated in the IEA Inter-laboratory Comparison

25 IEA Inter-laboratory Comparison Summary of the findings Most laboratories have acceptable agreement with the assigned values some laboratories have larger deviations from assigned values, especially for LED artifacts. The (relative) expanded uncertainties reported by a few of laboratories appear to have a larger difference than the suggested one, either too small or too big.

26 Lamp I Round robin test with 4 Russian Laboratories

27 Lamp II Round robin test with 4 Russian Laboratories

28 Laboratory Capacity Building Sweden Tunisia Vietnam Cuba Central America ECOWAS Jordan 28

29 Establishment of Swedish national lighting Laboratory

30 Training for Vietnam National Lighting Laboratories

31 Cooperation with Tunisia National Lighting Laboratory

32 Projects and activities Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

33 Technical Trainings in Vietnam lighting manufacturers

34 Lighting Training tour in China

35 Technical Trainings at GELC Training: South-South Cooperation Project Training on promotion of testing level & quality management

36 Projects and activities Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

37 Applied Research Qulity Control Subjective Evaluation Research OLED Research lab Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

38 Applied Research SSL Reliability Research lab Photometric Research lab Technical Advisory and Information Sharing LED Module Lifetime Research lab Training

39 Projects and activities Quality Control Lab Capacity Building Applied Research Technical Advisory and Information Sharing Training

40 Quality Information Release Platform

41 Workshops ECOWAS Regional Workshop Central America Regional Workshop

42 Discussion Southeast Asia and Pacific MVE Project Testing Laboratory capacity building Training MVE Information sharing framework

43 Shuming Hua General Director Global Efficient Lighting Centre