Per the Federal Facility Agreement for Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Article X.B.1, the attached document is the final version of the submitted

Transcription

1 Per the Federal Facility Agreement for Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Article X.B.1, the attached document is the final version of the submitted document.

2 r 11.. la. U.:4 '1,r/ ~... / de) ',vet;' J/ 3 ACUTE TOXICITY EVALUATION OF VARIOUS EFFLUENTS FROM THE lowa ARMY AMM1JNITION PLANT CONDUCTED MARCH 25-29, 1993 Prepared for: u.s. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE AGENCY ABERDEEN,PROVING GROUNDS Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland Prepared by: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC. St. Louis, Missouri ESE No April 1993 A CILCORP Comp any Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc.

3 ma Environmental.. ~ Science & ". -- Engineering, Inc. A.~. --. OJ CIO.aNU'_ April 9, vIr. Rick Puzniak U.S. Anny Environmental Hygiene Agency Building B-2100, Room 0201 Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland RE: Contract Number: DAAD05-92-D-7002 Dear 1vIr. Puzniak: Enclosed please find two copies of the report on the Acute Toxicity Evaluation of Various Effluents from Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, conducted March 25-29, Forty-eight-hour and 96-hour LC,roS were determined for Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas, respectively. Samples exhibiting 24-hour LC so < 100 percent effluent were evaluated through a Phase I Toxicity Reduction Ev~uation. Included in this report are the mortality and water quality results as well as a discussion of these results. All raw data sheets are maintained at Environmental Science & Engineering's (ESE) Midwest Regional Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, S1. Louis, Missouri. This information is submitted to the USAEHA in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Contract No. DAAD05-92-D Should there be any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me at (314) Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC. ~~~ Donna S. Hall Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory Coordinator Midwest Regional Office bkh.c-ecbio-si /iowa Enclosures lilburn Park ROJd St. l ouis, MO Phone(314)567~600 F,)l( (,)14) 51>

4 Printed 011 Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s l/iowa.i 4/08/93 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION TEST PROCEDURES TEST SUBSTANCES CERIODAPHNIA ACUTE TOXICITI TEST PIMEPHALES PROMELAS ACUTE TOXICITI TEST TIE PROCEDURES (DAY I) COMPLETION OF TIE PROCEDURES QUAUTI ASSURANCE TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION Il Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Testing Results Pimepha/es promelas Toxicity Testing Results SAMPLE LOCATION Il Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Testing Results Pimepha/es promeias Toxicity Testing Results QUAliTY ASSURANCE RESULTS DISCUSSION 8 APPENDICES A B C D E Chain of Custody Record and Test Substance Receipt Log Pick-up OrderlWork Order/Delivery Water QJlality Data Analytical Report Raw Data

5 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecblo-st/lowa.ii 4108/93 UST OF TABLES (Page 1 of 1) Table Page 2-1 Effluent Samples Collected and Received Mortality of Ceriodaphnia dubia Neonates to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 48-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-27, Mortality of Pimephales promelas Juveniles to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, Mortality of Ceriodaphnia dubia Neonates to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 48-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-27, Mortality of Pimephales promelas Juveniles to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, Mortality of Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to the Reference Toxicant, SDS, for 48 Hours, March 2~4, Mortality of Pimepha/es promelas Juveniles Exposed to the Reference Toxicant, SDS, for 48 Hours, March 2-4,

6 Prinled 011 R~ycred Paper c-«bio-sl/iowa.l 4/08/ INTRODUCTION Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc. (ESE) conducted two Definitive Static Acute Toxicity Test Sets utilizing Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas as the test species on samples collected from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant for the U.S. Anny Environmental Hygiene Agency, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland. The tests were conducted March 25-29, 1993, and followed EPA protocol number EPA/600/4-89/027. The criterion for effect was survival, but other adverse effects (when observed) were noted as well. Additionally, each sample was processed according to the Day 1 Procedures in the Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluation, Phase I Toxicity Characterization Procedures (EPA/600/3-88/034). According to this protocol, a complete Phase I Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) was performed on all samples dem~~strating. significant toxicity at the 24-hour observation. 2.0 TEST PROCEDURES 2.1 TEST SUBSTANCES The effluent samples were shipped via overnight courier on March 24, 1993 by personnel of the U.S. Anny Environmental Hygiene Agency and the Lone Star Anny Ammunition Plant for the static acute toxicity tests. Test initiation began immediately upon receipt of the samples. Samples were received at ESE's St. Louis Missouri Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory on March 25, 1993 (Table 2-1). Copies of sample chain-of-custody records and test substance receipt log are found in Appendix A. Copies of the pick-up order/work order/delivery sheets are found in Appendix B. Dilution water was moderately hard laboratory reconstituted freshwater. additionally utilized as the control water. This water was 1

7 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s l fiowa Table 2-1. Effluent Samples Collected and Received Sample Location Collection Times Received March March 24, March 24, March 25, 1993 (3 C) 1000 March 25, 1993 (3 C) Source: ESE '. 2

8 Pri nted on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-slriowa.j 4/08/ CERJODAPHNIA ACUTE TOXICITY TEST The tests were conducted in 100 ml glass beakers with 50 ml of test solution in each chamber. Test duration was 48 hours and conducted under static conditions at 20±2 C. The photoperiod was maintained at 16 hours light and 8 hours dark. The water quality measurements for the test period are found in Appendix C. Less than 24-hour old neonates were randomly added to test chambers with ten animals per replicate. Each concentration tested was replicated twice. Effluent was diluted with laboratory control water to prepare the desired concentration series, and laboratory controls were run concurrently. Animals were tested at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 percent effluent on a volume to volume basis. All quality control logbooks (i.e., meter calibration logs, Test Substance.. Receiving Log, etc.), reference toxicant test data, and raw data sheets are maintained at ESE's Midwest Regional Aquatic Toxicology LaboratoryI S1. Louis, Missouri. 2.3 PIMEPHALES PROMELAS ACUTE TOXICITY The test was conducted in l-iiter glass beakers with 400 ml of test solution in each chamber. Test duration was 96 hours ± 1 hour, and conducted under static conditions at 20±2 C. The photoperiod was maintained at 16 hours light and 8 hours dark. The water quality measurements for the test period are found in Appendix C. Fathead minnow larvae (4 days old) were randomly added to test chambers with ten animals per replicate. Each treatment tested was replicated twice. Laboratory controls were run concurrently. Animals were tested in 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 percent effluent diluted with laboratory reconstituted freshwater 011 a volume to volume basis. All quality control logbooks (i.e., meter calibration logs, Test Substance Receiving Log, etc.) reference toxicant test data, and raw data sheets are maintained at ESE's St. Louis, Missouri Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory. 3

9 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-al/lowa.a 4/03 / TIE PROCEDURES (DAY 1) Immediately upon sample receipt, one liter of each effluent was sub-sampled for the Day I TIE procedures. Effluent samples were manipulated by taking 300 ml volumes of each effluent and adjusting the ph to 3 or II standard units (SU) utilizing sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or hydrochloric acid (Hfll), A 300 ml volume was also kept at the original ph (PH). Bench scale treatments were performed on effluent fractions including: Filtration through 1.0 ~m glass fiber filter; Aeration (air striping column); and CIS solid phase extraction (SPE) column. All treated fractions were returned to plio, covered and stored at 4 C overnight. 2.5 COMPLETION OF TIE PROCEDURES Phase I TIE procedures are completed if the 24-hour LC so indicates toxicity. Treated effluent fractions from the previous day are brought to test temperature and readjusted to ph. Fractions were then tested at 4, 2, 1, and 0.5 times the 24-hour LC so value for effluents demonstrating toxicity. Additional procedures were then performed on effluent samples including: Oxidant reduction utilizing sodium thiosulfate (N~S103); Complexing of metals through ethylenediaminetetraacetate ligand (EDTA) chelation; and Graduated ph adjusted of the effluent to 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0 SU, at the 24-hour LC so ' A baseline toxicity test was also set up to establish the second day toxicity of the sample. 2.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE A reference toxicant test using sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) was conducted with neonate C. dubia. The static test was conducted for 48 hours at test concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/l. A control treatment consisting of reconstituted freshwater was also run, Dilution water was laboratory reconstituted freshwater. Ceriodaphnia were 4

10 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-sl/iow8.5 4/08/93 tested in 1OO-mL glass beakers containing 50 ml of test solution. Ten animals were tested per test container. The test was conducted at 20±2 C. Less than 24-hour old Ceriodaphnia were exposed from March 2-4, Additionally, a reference toxicant test using sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) was conducted with larval P. promelas. The static test was conducted for 48 hours at test concentrations of 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mg/l. A control treatment consisting of reconstituted freshwater was also run. Dilution water was laboratory reconstituted freshwater. P. promelas were tested in 1,000-mL glass beakers containing 750 ml of test solution. Ten animals were tested per test container. The test was conducted at 20±2 C. The 2 to 5-day old larvae were exposed from March 2-4, TEST RE..'iULTS 3.1 SAMPLE LOCATION The mortality results for this location are presented in Tables 3-1 and 3-2. location demonstrated no significant toxicity to the species tested..'j Overall this Ceriodaphnia Toxicity Testine Results C. dubia exhibited no acute toxicity to sample during the 48-hour exposure period. This is evidenced by 5 percent mortality in the 100 percent effluent treatment. No mortality was observed in any laboratory control replicates (see Table 3-1) Pimephales Promelas Toxicity Testine Results P. Promelas also exhibited no toxicity to sample Il-24 with a final 96-hour mortality of opercent in the 100 percent effluent treatment. No TRE procedures were performed. No mortality was observed in any laboratory control replicate (see Table 3-2). 5

11 Prilll~d on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-&lilowa /08/93 Table 3-1. Mortality of Ceriodaphnla dubia Neonates to Effluent Sample No. Il-24 from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 48-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-27, 1993 Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentration Repli- ohour 24 Hour 48 Hour Combined (percent) cate Laboratory A Control B A B A B ,,\J A B A B A B Source: ESE,

12 Primed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-sl/iowaj /09/93 Table 3-2. Mortality of Pimephales promelas Juveniles to the Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, 1993 Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentration Repli- =O...:::.H=o=u... r_-=-<..~~--:..~=~..:..=...::.=<.>:..:.._=-==--==== 24 Hour 48 Hour 72 Hour 96 Hour Combined (percent) cate Laboratory A Control B A B A l~ B A B A B A B Source: ESE,

13 Printed Of) Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s l/iowa.b 4/08/ SAJ.\1PLE LOCATION Mortality results for this location are found in Tables 3-3 through 3-4. sample demonstrated no significant toxicity to either test species. Overall this Ceriodaphllia Toxicity Testin2 Re.'iults C. dubia exhibited the greatest degree of acute toxicity to sample The 48-hour LC so could not be determined due to lack of significant toxicity to C. dubia. was observed in laboratory replicates. No toxicity Pimephales promelas Toxicity Testin2 Resultc; P. promelas exhibited no mortality to sample with a finalcumulative mortality of o percent in the 100 percent effluent treatment. A 96-hour LC so could not be determined due to lack of significant toxicity. Laboratory controls exhibited no acute toxicity in any.'~ replicates (see Table 3-4). 3.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE TOXICITY RESULTS Mortality of C. dubia during the 48-hour exposure to SDS is reported in Table 3-5. The 48-hour LC so for C. dubia using the Spearman Karber Method was 4.67 mg/l with 95 percent confidence limits of 3.76 to 5.78 mg/l. These values are within the normal range of values for SDS tests conducted at ESE. Mortality of P. promelas during the 48-hour exposure to SDS is reported in Table 3-6. The 48-hour LC so for P. promelas using the Logit Method was 3.74 mg/l with 95 percent confidence limits of 1.80 to 6.51 mg/l. These values are within the normal range of values for SDS tests conducted at ESE on this age group (24-48 hours old) of P. promelas, 4.0 DISCUSSION No complete TIE procedures were performed on samples and due to lack of toxicity based on mortality effects in both test species. 8

14 Printed on Recycled P~ pcr c-ecbio-sl/iowa /07 /93 Table 3-3. Mortality of Ceriodaphnia dubia Neonates to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, During a 48-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-27, Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentration Repli- ohour 24 Hour 48 Hour Combined (percent) cate Laboratory A Control B A B A B ,l ~.-.i 25.0 A B A B A B Source: ESE,

15 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-sl/iowa /08193 Table 3-4. Mortality of Pimephales promelas Juveniles to the Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, 1993 Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentration Repli- =O...:.H=o=u... r_-=-=---"-"-'=---'-=-"-=~--!.-"'--"'-"-'=_~"""-"-"=.:...-==== 24 Hour 4R Hour 72 Hour 96 Hour Combined (percent) care Laboratory A Control B A B A : B A B A B A B Source: ESE,

16 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s lfiowsj /08/93 Table 3-5. Mortality of Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to the Reference Toxicant, SDS, for 48 Hours, March 2-4, 1993 Nominal Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentrations 24 Hour 48 Hour (mg/l) Control 0 a a pi",' Source: ESE,

17 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-sl/iowaj -t /08/93 Table 3-6. Mortality of Pimephales promelas Juveniles Exposed to the Reference Toxicant, SDS, for 48 Hours, March 2-4, 1993 Nominal Cumulative Mortality (%) Concentrations 24 Hour 48 Hour (mg/l) Control ~'~ Source: ESE,

18 APPENDIX A Chain of Custody Record and Test Substance Receipt Log. ',1

19 -..-" ESE Bioassay Department st. Louis, Missouri Page: ESE QA Form No.: Effective: 011 JUly 1991 SUBJECT: Test Substance: J:~-~L.J Sponsor: 8PG XI-e4 TEST SUBSTANCE LOG project No. -I()lq-63QJ Date Substance Received: &f7.5/cj& Type/# of Containers Mode of Mail LFed. Exp. Received: l-a.ol Ct...tbi1a;NtC*fa:h Transp Airline -- Truck UOlJ...trf\ts rv 10L. UPS Other: Gross Weight - Net Substance of container(s): Weight (if provided) :. - Label Information: :ra-a4 :I"/-a=f ~C'i~K>'\'?iY t I \ Activity/purity: Density: solubility in Water: Color:otE/?!4 Form: ~~id "Powder crystal Pellet --Paste Salinity: - other: '-. Sta/e.Location/conditions:;ib?fc(lmC4w{f1J.} /0 A'OdJ d - 2.,I<t:-e. ~ ~. Date Recorded:cS~~ 7 Recorded by: J1Bfc 'TEST SUBSTANCE USAGE Date A.m~. Removed Tota~~~ved to Date Data by purpose (m, g) (ml, g) 6~~hA.3/as/q:; 5.ttb IJIFOr#! ~}\L //17/1 '>1:7 5:6LJDb'f.EOfJ...v ~:/h;;/a,l ; u v '-- I r( 'II"

20 fi I 1-~'iJ Q.I:-'T ~ otlm6 Cc "'t> v CPV r("ifis) c...!29lmj~ ) ~ IC'~' L~r1fl( ~~O 1"'2.. 7,3 ( { ffsj 1\&"'( (o ) J /r"'~{~ :r:~1"t:."'" ((JII'v(C l.-i}~'-,t 's IvAS)C't.,.~A... rtf:?,"'l'("'jl~ PIW'1 hl"lo-'i'lo,f!::> l'"";;;=, CT1/ "".LA ) -'2.. / cl

21 APPENDIX B Pick-up OrderlWork Order/Delivery

22 ;~ ;ONTRACT NAME BIOASSAY # 4 # 3 PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES PICK-UP ORDER/WORK ORDER/DELIVERY :ONTRACT. ABORATORY ESE LAB CONTRACT NO POC DONNA HALL TOTAL SAMPLES TIME/DATE OF NOTIFICATION OF PICK-UP 2- CALLED FOR PICK UP "he following analyses are to be performed on the identified samples: -NSTALLI';TI ON : USAEHf'\ NO. FIELD NO. MATRIX : REMARKS: ANALYSES : : O~~A AAF' : :-:r 1- 'il.\ _ _----: ~2-24-lllHQ : i:i. i -? l.\, : : :LT GARODN ICt<: :-:c 1 - "7..~ ---_._ :--~ : :"l'1.- '1...-~ _._ :- --_._ : _ I :" Y. I------~----~: :J."1.- "1..-y --_...._-._ :-_ _..._-: -----_ , -~ : : ~~ \..v1'ts)- 'l.\.are~ SEc 4T7"h{Hl;:~ Ac v r e -;C1...Cl/7 16::,.1)-/...c-> STIITI( 7(.~,... US,,; - FATJl.cltb ----~----:-5~?~~~~-: :: ~--~~~" I I 1\ -- / S". C'" I (~'(ICA'11 qn.j :_D~b~~~~~~-~~~-~~ L~-t~~ 2~-ffi2~~-~~~6~-~~~~- _ ~ (. ~ :_~!~~~~~_;1~~~nJLy~~~~~f~~~--L~:~~~~~~:~:~~~: ~i8_~ a ~ SJTE ~ "... I I -----:-~ ~----- : P<".TC /ex/qn 1;-;7/AU7' 5~~/:-~:h-,.-~;~c-~-FA~WD : ~~~~~ ; Lk..~ ~~~~t_te~ljv6, - 5r+1""- (8 - ~,.. u?;c - [(- I7~Dt1r},'v I - --= ~'"':"' L ( C"F.-len 717-,,-/, : 1~~~11'!._.?~~~~.:::: ~::'2.~ (<'-'V'/te:; j'?e. ~r t.'i 1,''> / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _A17~-s..~ ~LL SAI'1F:LES ARE COMPLETED AND RECEIVED INTACT. DATA AF'F'ROVED AND RELEASED BY: ()") /~~ JO BRE~YfGE ~~SEfYED ~ t:!3j!3rl' «.: 2'l:i'-(Z L"(IZ!:L--~~cf..L923 Cont C act LabocatDC y Rep. Received by L~bo~ato~y Courier Validated Time and Date of DATA DELIVERED BY: ~U~ 2-~?:amPle Receipt ~-----~~ ::ONTF\71T1NG OFFI~~' S REF'RESENTATIVE, USAEHA ~1.(/lV&Jt/G 'll( I~!l-!? Cj~ ~PLEASE CHECK SAMPLE ANALYTICAL METHODS SHEET* ~OTE: A COPY OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED FOR EACH SAMPLE 8ATCH AND RESPECTIVE SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE. VALIDATED TIME OF DATA RECEIPT: DATA RECEIVED BY: Laboratory Courier Date/Time Contracting Officer's Rep.

23 APPENDIX C Water Quality Data

24 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-sl/iowa-lb3 4/09/93 Table C-1. Waler Quality Measurements for Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Anny Ammunition Plant, During a 48-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-27, 1993 Test Daily Water Quality Test Initiation Water Quality Concentration Parameter o Hour 24 Hour 48 Hour A B A B A B Parameter 100 Percent Lab Control Temperature COnd (0C) Alk t Hard. t TRC (rng/l) < TOC (mgil) NH Lab Control Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) Lab Control ph x: r.: ~hms/cm. t... mgil as N. rng/l as CaC0 3 Source: ESE, 1993.

25 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s 1/iowa-tb3 4/09/93 Table C-2. Water Quality Measurements for Pimephales promelas Exposed to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, 1993 Test Daily Water Quality Concentration Parameter o Hour 24 Hour 48 Hour 72 Hour 96 Hour A B A B A B A B A B Lab Control Temperature (0C) Lab Control Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) ~:. Lab Control ph Percent Alkalinity" l'\- 126 Hardness* 182 Conductivity] 230 TRC (mgil) <0.1 TOC (mgil) 5.4 NH 3"'* 0.11 '" t mgll as CaCO). ~hms/cm. ** mgil as N. Source: ESE, 1993.

26 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-s I/iowa-tb3 4/09193 Table C-3. Water Quality Measurements for Ceriodaphnia dubia Exposed to Effluent Sample No from the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, During a 48~Hour Exposure Period. March 25-27, 1993 Test Daily Water Quality Test Initiation Water Quality Concentration Parameter o Hour 24 Hour 48 Hour A B A B A B Parameter 100 Percent Lab Control Temperature Cond.v ("C) Alk.'] Hard.t TRC (mg/l) < TOC (mg/l) NH/o4o 0.22 Lab Control Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) Lab Control ph ~hmslcm. t mgil as CaCO). o4o. mg/l as N. r.: Source: ESE, 1993.

27 Printed on Recycled Paper c-ecbio-si/iowa-tb3 4/09/93 Table C-4. Water Quality Measurements for Pimephales prome/as Exposed to Effluent Sample No from tbe Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, During a 96-Hour Exposure Period, March 25-29, 1993 Test Daily Water Quality Concentration Parameter o Hour 24 Hour 48 Hour 72 Hour 96 Hour A B A B A B A B A B Lab Control Temperature ("C) Lab Control Dissolved Oxygen (ppm) , ,4 7, Lab Control ph Percent Alkalinity" r,': 46 Hardness" 158 Conductivity] 280 TRC (mgll) <0.1 TOC (mg/l) 1.6 NHl>l<>I< >I< mgil as CaCO l. t J-thms/cm. JII.;c mgllas N. Source: ESE, 1993.

28 APPENDIXD Analytical Report

29 , ':.:'11'~i~=01. :. I ; : ~ ','.';;; ;';;~":',.i~~ C4:~~;J;.> ;;:;, ~:,'::c' \ f:.;:';;, ~.' :t ; \":,ic:;;l;.'c.~.;i.'(;\:\';;::;;,:;ti::"';::j.:; i:, ;':' >.r:",. ~En~erl.!'g~ Jn~~:;" : ~.. : ~ ~ ~ >~1t-.to ~' ''<I.>l~~~~ I.~:~. -..".....-:.' ~''-': ' '' :' : '.1;.1'/;. ~- ~ : :...: h _ : : : ;.~:"'... <~hp': Jl;fk\~ ~(t\~.~'i:1tq!y.,.,.. ; ~ ~.: w:.....: :~.~~,. ;'; -.,.. : :).:~. ', ~.. ::. : : :,:.,q. :;,;'..,, :. ".,~.. ~.. l ;<. ;.: :~ l~ ~.; t ~~~.f. ~ :.,: >~\t ' : ;., :.) ~ : PAGE HUMBER: REPORl DATE: DATE RECEIVED: PROJECT NUMBER: l.!l (La: o!o.. bc\j 1-(") C\J 1/1 lme: AB ERDEEN.PROVING GROUND J CLIENT PROJECT HUMBER: m~ SAMPLE ESE SAMPLE DATE QESCRIPTION ~lts 11705*1 03/24/ WATER 11705*2 03/24/ WATER METHOD no. DATE ANAlYZED ANALVST. _ ~ ~IA NITROGEN, TOC MG{L HG/L ' CJF CJF ċ '<J'.. 1/1 Report 'Appr oved by: ~"" ~~_~ ~ ir ara G aya- sh. ESE Project Maniger CD ~ 0... a: