Real Energy Efficiency Targets Deliverables from Eco-design, Energy Services and Cogeneration. Salzburg 7 September 2010.

Transcription

1 Real Energy Efficiency Targets Deliverables from Eco-design, Energy Services and Cogeneration Salzburg 7 September 2010 Ture Hammar

2 Real energy efficiency - deliverables from eco design, energy services & CHP Europe 2020 Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2011 Eco design & sufficiency Role of integrated solutions (incl. CHP&DHC)

3 Europe 2020 Europe 2020 is the EU post-lisbon strategy Challenges of Europe towards 2020: 80 million people past 60 years old Little natural gas and oil resources left Economic recession & slow growth Communities non-sufficient and nonsustainable Potentials in employment, education & efficiency

4 Europe 2020 & 2011 EEAP EU EEAPs in 2000 and 2007, included in strategy Employment rate from 69% to 75% Energy efficiency investments may deliver R&D share minimum 3% of GDP R&D support in sustainable energy should double (Danish proposal) Targets for to be maintained Follow up in economic support, action plan and recast of directives People with long education 31% => 40% Intelligent, sustainable and inclusive growth

5

6 Recent considerations of energy efficiency policies in Brussels Actions from 2007 EEAP not implemented Unclear definition of 20% efficiency target (202020) or 9% savings target (Energy Service Directive) Directives not implemented (correct) in all Member states Recast of several directives on-going Unclear picture of Combined Heat and Power and district heating & cooling New initiatives regarding intelligent solutions, smart grids, green ICT, etc. Involvement of responsible energy companies & ESCOs Covenant of Mayors New priority initiatives in energy renovation & recovery funds Extra efforts needed!

7 List of suggested initiatives Mandatory and well-defined targets for Member States 2020 & 2025 Clear data collection and statistical quality Study of impacts to economy, employment and environment Follow up on comprehensive financing of energy renovation and + zero houses, allocation of structural funds Revision of Energy Service Directive, including combined heat & power and district heating & cooling Commitment in Member States

8 Trends in eco design Maslow s hierarchy of needs is there room for energy efficiency?

9 Trends in development of products and equipment More and more house space per capita Appliance market is not saturated by 100% (2 TVs, 2 refrigerators, 2 cars, 2 houses, 2 much.) More and more products are subject to eco design & label regulation A couple of products in products in 2005 Today 33 products in eco design products in Energy Star Recast eco design will comprise much more. Efficient or sufficient?

10

11 Average number of persons per household (source Rod Janssen)

12 Floor space in US houses

13 Important to improve quality & performance of energy using products (EuP)

14

15 Labelling & campaigns & commitment go together well Market share of A-labelled cooling appliances in the EU and DK % Year DK A-share EU A-share

16 Energy Intensity mtoe/m 2007 Eneriintensitet (EU27 + Japan, Norge og USA 2007)

17 Integrated solutions as CHP and DHC open for reuse/recycling & use of difficult resources

18 Elforbrug Rumopvarmning Konverteringstab m.m. Effektiviseringer PJ/år Transport Proces (ekskl. el) CHP? VE (evt. også CCS) Energiforbrug 2007 Vedvarende energi 2007 Anden VE Vind Affald Træ Halm

19 Saving of energy and GHGreduction Example: Building at m2 (School) Energy consumption - total input In kwh GHG emission from the heating In kg Danish conditions

20 The EU CHP picture has not changed much since 2005

21 50% FI Share CHP Heat vs Total Heat 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% III CY MT IIa SE BG PT SI ES BE FR UK LU IE EL IT DE EU27 I CZ EE AT LT PL HU IIb CHP share of total electricity & heat in EU member states NL RO 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% LV SK DK S

22 Views of Euroheat & Power Omissions RES policies do not encourage efficiency The Cogeneration Directive has proven little effective and ignores district heating and cooling The Buildings Directive encourages RES but discourages the use of surplus heat. Eco-cities aggregation of ecobuildings. The ETS does not take care of energy savings in the residential sector, nor of business models The Economic Recovery Plan focuses on interconnections, not on energy saving infrastructure The Energy Efficiency Action Plan has been delayed by more than one year

23 What to do to promote CHP & DHC? Revise CHP directive as part of new energy service directive Integrate CHP & DHC in sustainable energy action plans local/regional (Covenant of Mayors) Establish right framework: - organisation, co-operation, economic incentives, etc. Financing opportunities through new funds and schemes, support by recovery funds

24 Embodied CO2 emissions globally

25 and from now on?

26 Copyright Dilbert s