Allen-Morrison, Lynchburg, VA Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

Transcription

1 Allen-Morrison, Lynchburg, VA Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks (Updated Spring 2010) 1 Standard Benchmarks BENCHMARKS UNITS PRE PROJECT GOAL Property value (Pre/Post)Redevelopment value TBD Annual Tax Revenue 0 Public sector incentives Brownfields, Infrastructure, Other NA Ratio public cost to total redevelopment value NA Land remediated and Acres NA 16.9 acres redeveloped Building area Square feet Allen-Morrison (87,800 sq. ft.) and Thornhill developed/restored (86,400 sq. ft.) (post) ( actsheets/lynchburg_susfs.pdf) Number of jobs created/retained Created/retained (full/part-time) (if available construction/regular) 0 Create local jobs and volunteer opportunities ( 1 The data matrices are intended to present an informal pre-development snapshot of conventional and sustainability-oriented information for each of the U.S. EPA s Brownfields Sustainability Pilots and their surrounding neighborhoods. Information was gathered from the U.S. Census and a variety of preliminary planning documents from 2008 to Given that most of these projects are at the early stages of planning and development, the information below is subject to change. For questions, please contact Christopher De Sousa, chris.desousa@ryerson.ca. Research support provided by Jason Tilidetzke and Kevin Duffy. This work was performed under a subcontract with the University of Illinois at Chicago and made possible by grant number TR from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1

2 CENSUS BENCHMARKS 2

3 .25 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation Population 1,281 2, Total White Alone 895 1, Total Black Alone Total Hispanic Households Total Families Total 593 1, Occupied Housing Vacant Housing Renter Occupied Owner Occupied For Rent for Sale Median HH income $34,566 $44,000 $23,500 $7,855 Aggregate HH Income $12,777,300 $23,749,300 $1,791,200 $9,024,485 Per Capita Income $15,110 $18,090 $12,730 $2,123 Number Under Poverty Level 1,303 2, Median Home Value $61,417 $94,600 $40,200 $20,712

4 .50 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation Population 1,281 2, Total White Alone 895 1, Total Black Alone Total Hispanic Households Total Families Total 593 1, Occupied Housing Vacant Housing Renter Occupied Owner Occupied For Rent for Sale Median HH income $34,566 $44,000 $23,500 $7,855 Aggregate HH Income $12,777,300 $23,749,300 $1,791,200 $9,024,485 Per Capita Income $15,110 $18,090 $12,730 $2,123 Number Under Poverty Level 1,303 2, Median Home Value $61,417 $94,600 $40,200 $20,712

5 1 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation Population 1,217 2, Total White Alone 744 1, Total Black Alone 436 1, Total Hispanic Households Total Families Total 526 1, Occupied Housing Vacant Housing Renter Occupied Owner Occupied For Rent for Sale Median HH income $33,113 $44,000 $23,500 $6,685 Aggregate HH Income $11,403,657 $23,749,300 $422,900 $7,672,919 Per Capita Income $13,619 $18,090 $3,915 $3,627 Number Under Poverty Level 1,137 2, Median Home Value $59,415 $94,600 $39,400 $15,764

6 Lynchburg County Mean Max Min St. Deviation Population 1,305 3, Total White Alone 870 2, Total Black Alone 388 1, Total Hispanic Households 510 1, Total Families Total 553 1, Occupied Housing Vacant Housing Renter Occupied Owner Occupied For Rent for Sale 510 1, Median HH income $41,036 $100,247 $6,250 $21,373 Aggregate HH Income $17,221,806 $71,422,700 $43,100 $15,980,638 Per Capita Income $18,073 $41,048 $3,915 $8,079 Number Under Poverty Level 1,179 2, Median Home Value $83,190 $236,500 $22,500 $44,537

7 SUSTAINABILITY BENCHMARKS Economic UNITS PRE PROJECT GOAL Value of surrounding property (Pre/Post) Assessed Value See Census Public costs per job created (permanent) Use above values NA TBD Number of new businesses on the site (Post) Development proposal 0 Influences local household income (Pre/Post) Census See Census Environment LEED building rating None NA Proportion of contaminated soil managed on Total soil estimated/soil NA TBD- additional tests will determine site vs. diverted off removed from site Density (Post) Floor area ratio, net density TBD TBD Pedestrian infrastructure (pre/post); length of sidewalks (meters, remote sensing, maps), part of a citywide trail system Bike infrastructure (pre/post) (bike racks) 0 YES Bike trails (meters) 0, part of a citywide trail system Transit access (pre/post) (transit stops) 0 TBD Public parks and open space (post) (acres) Canopy cover (pre/post longer increments) (% of total area) (Remote TBD aerial photo comparison Sensing) Natural habitat created and restored (post) (acres, % of site area) connectivity Access to waterfront (pre/post) (meters or linear feet) (sailing club) N Pervious vs. impervious (% total area) Remote sensing?? Stormwater management (post) (Cubic meters, green roof, rain garden, cistern (Center for Neigh Tech tool) Local food production 0, nonprofit urban farm Water efficiency building and land (% reduction, check reports) 0 TBD Energy efficiency (kwh saved, check reports) 0 NA Energy generation (renewable energy (kwh/year, check development NA production) proposal) Building restoration/reuse (sq. ft., % total, energy of N materials estimate?) Materials reuse : 173,000 board feet of lumber with an estimated reuse 7

8 Waste management (diversion rate) market value of $103, ,300 pounds of metals with an estimated reuse market value of $20, ,500 bricks with an estimated reuse market value of $190,100 ( enmorrison.pdf). Develop a material reuse inventory tool to collect information on building materials, estimating recoverable quantities of deconstruction materials, estimating costs or values of materials inventoried, and identifying regulatory concerns; conducting a hazardous materials survey; assessing the feasibility of deconstructing the Allen-Morrison and Thornhill facilities; conducting a quantitative inventory of the Thornhill facility buildings; and providing recommendations for onsite material reuse. ( nchburg_susfs.pdf) Reuse lumber in redevelopment Milled in on-site artist studio or carpentry/furniture shop On-site landscaping (mulch, garden boxes) Crush concrete and concrete masonry units for reuse on site Reuse salvaged brick Recreate historic masonry Leave walls in place Crush for other reuse Grind asphalt for reuse or as sub-base ( 8

9 Social and Community Involves coordination among multiple stakeholders (yes/no, interviews) (High) Involves an open public participation process (some measure of scale (High) (arnstein), interviews) Community amenity (# of community venues) 1 (sailing storage) 4+ venues (community center, playground, picnic areas, small outdoor theatre) Affordable housing (# of units, % of total units, NA N development proposal) Allows for some level of local control over Interviews 0 NA the project Reduces local crime rate Crime statistics NA TBD Provides an opportunity for training (# of individuals trained or NA hours of training, Check proposal or interviews) Educational opportunities Involves a mixture of land uses Two or more different uses 0 N Suggested measures for tracking by city: Economic Employment full-time, part-time, seasonal, location of employee residence (local, walkable) Environmental Access survey: how users access the site (mode and distance traveled) Environmental tracking/auditing: water, waste and recycling, stormwater filtrated onsite Community Number/type of community events and participation Number of visitors 9