Managing Service Delivery and Backlog Eradication in the City of Tshwane

Transcription

1 Managing Service Delivery and Backlog Eradication in the City of Tshwane Presented by Frans Mouton Services Infrastructure Development Department Water and Sanitation Division 29 August 2012 Content Organogram: Based on Project Life Cycle Planning Framework Outline the overall backlog strategy Distinguish between SERVICES BACKLOG and HOUSING BACKLOG. Projects program and progress Effect of densification On-site sanitation for rural and / or interim free basic sanitation Conclusions 1

2 Organogram based on Project Life Cycle Concept Approval (Budget) Commissioning De-commissioning Planning Infrastructure Provision O&M Organogram based on Project Life Cycle Investment/Project Management New Infrastructure Existing Infrastructure Asset Management R R Concept Approval (Budget) Time Commissioning Time De-commissioning Planning Infrastructure Provision O&M 2

3 Organogram based on Project Life Cycle Investment/Project Management New Infrastructure Existing Infrastructure Asset Management R R Concept Approval (Budget) Time Commissioning Time De-commissioning Planning Infrastructure Provision O&M W & S Planning Infrastructure Provision Bulk Water Services Water Demand and Conservation Water Distribution Waste Water Collection and Effluent Management Waste Water Treatment Office Administration and Support Planning Framework W&S Infrastructure Plan 6 3

4 Planning Framework W&S: Metropolitan Spatial Development Spatial expression to IDP and CDF Long and medium term All aspects of spatial planning land use planning movement patterns buildings and built-up areas open space systems planning of roads service infrastructure 7 Water & Sanitation Master Plan The Water & Sanitation Master Plan has a 25-year planning horizon with infrastructure requirements for existing and future developments. The Master Plan is updated quarterly to reflect new influences from both the private and public sector as well as political decisions. Development of infrastructure is scheduled within budget constraint to ensure adequate capacity at any time. Bulk infrastructure required for new developments are at least partly funded by services contributions from the developer. 8 4

5 Overall Backlog Eradication Strategy 1. Firstly provide sufficient capacity in bulk services to enable In situ upgrade of water and sanitation in formalised areas Water and sanitation services in new Housing developments 2. Provide water and sanitation services for in situ formalised areas Full service water with metered connections Waterborne sanitation and toilets per stand 3. Provide free interim basic services on application until sufficient funding is available to provide full services for in situ formalised areas Free Basic water: Standpipes no more than 200m from any house Free Basic sanitation: UDS toilet per stand 4. Provide rudimentary services for informal areas until relocation is possible when in situ upgrade is not feasible SERVICES BACKLOG versus HOUSING BACKLOG Services Backlog SERVICES BACKLOG is a backlog of inadequate water and sanitation services for in situ formalisable areas (mainly in Winterveld, Kudube, Stinkwater and New Eersterust). Eradication is addressed by the Water and Sanitation Division of the Services Infrastructure Department. Water and sanitation services only are provided. Eradication projects are funded from the City of Tshwane budget Housing Backlog HOUSING BACKLOG is a backlog of inadequate housing, including services in informal areas. Eradication is addressed by the Housing and Sustainable Human Settlement Development Department. Full services as well as houses are provided. Eradication projects are usually funded from housing subsidies and do not impact onthecityoftshwanebudget. 5

6 Water Backlog Eradication Target and Actual Rate Achieved Excluding informal areas December 2008 National target of at least basic water service (24 403) households) Households Target Backlog Eradication & Upgrade Actual Backlog Eradication / / / / /11 Year In situ Formalised Areas Sanitation Backlog Eradication Projects by the Water & Sanitation Division: Location

7 Formalised Areas Sanitation Projects: Program according to the MTREF W&S budget Area Sanitation backlog eradication program Wards No of households Current Service Target Construction period Estimated Cost (Millions R) levels service level Start Finish IDP project number 1 Ramotse-Marokolong, Below basic Full 07/ / Kudube Below basic Full 07/ / S 3 Kudube Below basic Full 07/ / K 4 Kudube 10 (Leboneng) Below basic Full Completed Completed J 5 Suurman-Majaneng 8, Below basic Full 07/ / Q 6 Dilopye Below basic Basic 07/ / O&M budget 7 Stinkwater 13, Below basic Full 07/ / L 8 Stinkwater Ext Below basic Full 04/ / M 9 Stinkwater Ext 2 to Below basic Full 07/ / N 10 New Eersterust Ext 1 to Below basic Full 07/ / O 11 New Eersterust Ext 4 to Below basic Full 07/ / P 13 Winterveld 9, Below basic Basic 07/ / O&M budget Progress with Sanitation Service Backlog Eradication in formalised and semi-formalised areas without densification (both waterborne and basic on-site sanitation) Sanitation Backlog Eradication Planned Original December 2014 National target (38760 households) Households Achieved / / / / / / / /14 Year Planned Actual 7

8 Densification Effect of densification in Temba 2003 to 2010: Suburb Households 2003 Households 2010 Difference Ramotse, Marokolong, Suurman, Mashemong, Majaneng Kudube Kudube Kudube Totals * * =62970 Progress with Sanitation Service Backlog Eradication in formalised and semi-formalised areas with densification (both waterborne and basic on-site sanitation) Sanitation Backlog Eradication with densification June 2016 Target ( households) Households Achieved Planned / / / / / / / / / /16 Year Planned Actual Effect of Densification 8

9 Informal Areas Formalisation Program* The City of Tshwane has approximately households residing in informal settlements. Of the 65 informal settlements in 2006, the City has to date formalized 33 informal settlements. Informal settlements unsuitable for in situ formalisation are commonly located on: Land that is not developable such as on dolomitic soil conditions, road and rail reserves, flood plains and environmentally sensitive or dangerous areas. Private or public land which is developable but where funds are not available and/or inadequate for immediate development or resettlement. The residents of informal settlements unsuitable for in situ formalisation are destined to be relocated to new fully serviced developments. *Information supplied by Housing and Sustainable Human Settlement Development Department 17 Interim services for informal areas that are to be re-developed or where the occupants are to be relocated to new Housing developments Services to be provided are temporary. Service levels may be lower than the National Basic targets. Water Rudimentary Tanks or standpipes at no more than 500m from any dwelling Sanitation Rudimentary Unimproved pit latrine/chemical toilet: communal or per stand 9

10 Free Basic Sanitation provided as interim service / rural developments: On-Site: Double Vault UDS Toilet Example of double vault UDS toilet 10

11 Constraints & Challenges The main constraints to the provision of waterborne sanitation are: Provision of bulk services Long lead times for new Treatment Works Un-controlled densification Insufficient funding. Challenges: Community demands (often unreasonable) Poorly skilled main and sub-contractors Cumbersome unavoidable compulsory MFMA procedures On-site sanitation implementation needs close community participation which is a time-consuming process Thank You 11