Transcription

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43 Salt River Source: USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps - Brooks and Shepherdsville, Kentucky Quads SHEPHERDS CROSSING MITIGATION q Legend Proposed Bank Site 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Feet SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/Figures/Prospectus/Site Location REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE DRAWN BY EDB SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1

44 Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010). Salt River q Legend Proposed Bank Site SHEPHERDS CROSSING MITIGATION 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Feet SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/Figures/Prospectus/Aerial REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE DRAWN BY EDB 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH MAP FIGURE 21

45 Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010); NWI US Fish and Wildlife Service, Kentucky (2010). PUBHh PFO1A PFO1F PUBHh PUBHh PUBH PUBHx PUBHx PUBHh PFO1C q PUSC PUBHh PUBH R2UBH PUSC PUBH PUBHh PFO1C PUBH PUBH Legend Proposed Bank Site PFO1A - Palustrine, Forested, Broad-Leaved Deciduous, Temporary Flooded PFO1C - Palustrine, Forested, Broad-Leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded PFO1F - Palustrine, Forested, Broad-Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded PUBHx PSS1F - Palustrine, Scrub-Shrub, Broad-Leaved Deciduous, Semipermanently Flooded PUBFx - Palustrine, Unconsolidated Bottom, Semipermanently Flooded, Excavated PUBH - Palustrine, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded PUBHh - Palustrine, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded, Diked PUBHx - Palustrine, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded, Excavated PUSC - Palustrine, Unconsolidated Shore, Seasonally Flooded R2UBH - Riverine, Lower Perennial, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded PSS1F PUBH PUBH 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet PUBFx SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/Figures/Prospectus/NWI REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE DRAWN BY EDB NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP FIGURE 31

46 S A L T R I V E R S A L T R I V E R Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010). q Well 1!( 2 Well 2!( !( S S A A L L T T R R I I V V E E R R 5!( 1!( !( Well 3 6!( Legend Proposed Bank Site Drainage Ditch 7!( 9 8!(!( Jurisdictional Wetland Wetland Data Point!( Soil Profile 5 Monitoring Well NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATER/WETLAND BOUNDARIES WERE SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/11-068/Figures/Prospectus/ExistingConditionsMap DELINEATED AND SURVEYED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM Feet EQUIPMENT BY REDWING WETLAND SCIENTISTS ON JANUARY 23, THESE BOUNDARIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. USE OF THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE: DRAWN BY EDB EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP FIGURE 4

47 S A L T R I V E R S A L T R I V E R Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010). q S S A A L L T T R R I I V V E E R R Legend Proposed Bank Site Proposed Buffer Proposed Depression/Scrape Proposed Excavation (Old Field Removal) Proposed Fill SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY Feet FILE: Redwing/11-068/Figures/Prospectus/ConceptMitigationPlan REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE: DRAWN BY EDB CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FIGURE 5

48 Source: River Basin and County Basefiles from Kentucky Geological Survey; Rivers, Streams, and Interstate Highway Basefiles from ESRI BOONE KENTON GALLATIN PENDLETON BRACKEN CARROLL GRANT q TRIMBLE OWEN ROBERTSON MASON HENRY HARRISON Legend OLDHAM FLEMING Salt River Basin NICHOLAS Salt River HUC SCOTT Silver-Little Kentucky River HUC JEFFERSON SHELBY FRANKLIN BOURBON SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK SITE LOCATION BATH MEADE BULLITT SPENCER ANDERSON WOODFORD FAYETTE CLARK MONTGOMERY MENIFEE HANCOCK JESSAMINE BRECKINRIDGE NELSON MERCER POWELL DAVIESS WASHINGTON HARDIN MADISON ESTILL WOLFE GARRARD BOYLE LEE LARUE MARION OHIO GRAYSON LINCOLN JACKSON OWSLEY MUHLENBERG BUTLER EDMONSON Miles HART GREEN TAYLOR ADAIR CASEY PULASKI SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/11-068/Figures/Prospectus/Service Area Map REDWING PROJECT PRINT DATE DRAWN BY BJO/EDB ROCKCASTLE LAUREL CLAY SERVICE AREA MAP FIGURE 6

49 Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010); Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Bullitt County, Kentucky q ElC 4!( 5!( ElB 6!( 3 2!(!( ElB!( 7 MbD3 10!( Ne 1!( 9!( 8!( Legend Proposed Bank Site!( Soil Profile Sampling Location ElB - Elk silt loam, occasionally flooded, 2 to 6 percent slopes ElC - Elk silt loam, occasionally flooded, 6 to 12 percent slopes MbD3 - Markland silty clay, occasionally flooded, 10 to 30 percent slopes, severely eroded Ne - Newark silt loam, frequently flooded* * Hydric by Inclusion Soil ,020 1,530 2,040 Feet SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/Figures/Prospectus/Soil Map REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE DRAWN BY EDB SOIL SURVEY MAP FIGURE 71

50 Source: NAIP/FSA Kentucky Imagery kygisserver.ky.gov (2010); FEMA Q3 Data for Kentucky (2007). q Legend Proposed Bank Site 100-Year Floodplain 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Feet SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY FILE: Redwing/Figures/Prospectus/FEMA REDWING PROJECT REVISED DATE DRAWN BY EDB FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP FIGURE 81

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Salt River Mitigation Bank - Moore Property City/County: Bullitt Sampling Date: 1/23/13 Applicant/Owner: Flynn Contracting State: Kentucky Sampling Point: DP1 Investigator(s): R. Fangman; L. Darnell Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR N Lat.: N Long.: W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Newark silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present? Wetland hydrology present? Yes Yes Yes Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) X X High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) X Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Microtopographic Relief (D4) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11 Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 (includes capillary fringe) Wetland hydrology present? Yes Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

84 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: DP1 Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) 7 8 Prevalence Index Worksheet 9 Total % Cover of: 10 OBL species x 1 = = Total Cover FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = Sapling/Shurb Absolute % Dominant Indicator FACU species x 4 = Plot Size (15') Stratum Cover Species Staus UPL species x 5 = 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Yes FACW Column totals (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 7 X 2 - Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 3.0* Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 5 = Total Cover separate sheet) Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size (30') Herb Stratum Plot Size (5') Absolute % Cover Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Dominant Species = Total Cover Indicator Staus Indicator Staus Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland Lysimachia nummularia Andropogon virginicus Symphyotrichum sp. Carex vulpinoidea Juncus effusus Yes No No No No FACW FACU OBL FACW hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Juncus tenuis Bidens frondosa 3 1 No No FAC FACW Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, 15 and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 74 = Total Cover Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

85 SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture YR 5/ YR 5/4 20 C M silty clay loam 10YR 5/8 15 C M YR 6/ YR 5/4 25 C M silty clay loam 10YR 5/8 20 C M Remarks 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains - 2 Location: PL=Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR,N Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gley Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) and weltand hydrology must be Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material ( F21) (MLRA 127, 147) present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Yes Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

86 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Salt River Mitigation Bank - Moore Property City/County: Bullitt Sampling Date: 1/23/13 Applicant/Owner: Flynn Contracting State: Kentucky Sampling Point: DP2 Investigator(s): R. Fangman; L. Darnell Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slight slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): <1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR N Lat.: N Long.: W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Newark silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present? Wetland hydrology present? No Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? No Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >14 Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >14 (includes capillary fringe) Wetland hydrology present? No Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:

87 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: DP2 Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B) 7 8 Prevalence Index Worksheet 9 Total % Cover of: 10 OBL species x 1 = = Total Cover FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = Sapling/Shurb Absolute % Dominant Indicator FACU species x 4 = Plot Size (15') Stratum Cover Species Staus UPL species x 5 = 1 Column totals (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 3.0* Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a = Total Cover separate sheet) Herb Stratum Plot Size (5') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species = Total Cover Indicator Staus Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland Setaria faberi Persicaria cf. hydropiperoides Carex frankii Bidens frondosa Erigeron annuus Yes Yes No No No UPL OBL OBL FACW FACU hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, 15 and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 74 = Total Cover Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Staus Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)

88 SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture YR 5/ YR 5/6 15 C M silt loam YR 6/ YR 5/8 15 C M silt loam 10YR 5/3 10 C M Remarks 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains - 2 Location: PL=Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR,N Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gley Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) and weltand hydrology must be Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material ( F21) (MLRA 127, 147) present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Yes Remarks:

89 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Salt River Mitigation Bank - Moore Property City/County: Bullitt Sampling Date: 1/23/13 Applicant/Owner: Flynn Contracting State: Kentucky Sampling Point: DP3 Investigator(s): R. Fangman; L. Darnell Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR N Lat.: N Long.: W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Newark silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present? Wetland hydrology present? Yes Yes Yes Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) X X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Microtopographic Relief (D4) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 7 Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 (includes capillary fringe) Wetland hydrology present? Yes Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:

90 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: DP3 Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 Yes FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) 7 8 Prevalence Index Worksheet 9 Total % Cover of: 10 OBL species x 1 = 15 = Total Cover FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = Sapling/Shurb Absolute % Dominant Indicator FACU species x 4 = Plot Size (15') Stratum Cover Species Staus UPL species x 5 = 1 Column totals (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 7 X 2 - Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 3.0* Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a = Total Cover separate sheet) Herb Stratum Plot Size (5') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species = Total Cover Indicator Staus Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland Phalaris arundinacea 95 Yes FACW hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, 15 and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 95 = Total Cover Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Staus Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)

91 SOIL Sampling Point: DP3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Texture (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Loc Y 5/ Y 5/8 20 C M silty clay laom Remarks 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains - 2 Location: PL=Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR,N Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gley Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) and weltand hydrology must be Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material ( F21) (MLRA 127, 147) present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? Yes Remarks:

92 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Salt River Mitigation Bank - Moore Property City/County: Bullitt Sampling Date: 1/23/13 Applicant/Owner: Flynn Contracting State: Kentucky Sampling Point: DP4 Investigator(s): R. Fangman; L. Darnell Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): ~2% Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR N Lat.: N Long.: W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Newark silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present? Wetland hydrology present? No No No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? No Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >14 Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): >14 (includes capillary fringe) Wetland hydrology present? No Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:

93 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: DP4 Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0% (A/B) 7 8 Prevalence Index Worksheet 9 Total % Cover of: 10 OBL species x 1 = = Total Cover FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = Sapling/Shurb Absolute % Dominant Indicator FACU species x 4 = Plot Size (15') Stratum Cover Species Staus UPL species x 5 = 1 Column totals (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 3.0* Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a = Total Cover separate sheet) Herb Stratum Plot Size (5') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species = Total Cover Indicator Staus Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland Cerastium cf. fontanum Lamium purpureum Zea mays Sorghum halepense Trifolium repens Yes Yes No No No FACU UPL UPL FACU FACU hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Setaria faberi Amaranthus sp. 3 2 No No UPL Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, 15 and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 44 = Total Cover Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Staus Hydrophytic vegetation present? No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)

94 SOIL Sampling Point: DP4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture YR 5/ YR 5/2 5 D M silt loam YR 5/ YR 5/2 25 D M silt loam 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M Remarks 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains - 2 Location: PL=Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR,N Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gley Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) and weltand hydrology must be Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material ( F21) (MLRA 127, 147) present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? No Remarks:

95 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Salt River Mitigation Bank - Moore Property City/County: Bullitt Sampling Date: 1/23/13 Applicant/Owner: Flynn Contracting State: Kentucky Sampling Point: DP5 Investigator(s): R. Fangman; L. Darnell Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): ~1% Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR N Lat.: N Long.: W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Markland silty clay, occasionally flooded, 10-30% slopes, severely eroded NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Yes (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation, soil, or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes (If needed, explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present? Wetland hydrology present? Yes No Yes Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? No Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) X X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Microtopographic Relief (D4) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): NA Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8 Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8 (includes capillary fringe) Wetland hydrology present? Yes Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:

96 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: DP5 Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Dominant Indicator Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) 7 8 Prevalence Index Worksheet 9 Total % Cover of: 10 OBL species x 1 = = Total Cover FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = Sapling/Shurb Absolute % Dominant Indicator FACU species x 4 = Plot Size (15') Stratum Cover Species Staus UPL species x 5 = 1 Column totals (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 7 X 2 - Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 3.0* Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a = Total Cover separate sheet) Herb Stratum Plot Size (5') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species = Total Cover Indicator Staus Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland Ambrosia trifida Bidens frondosa Lysimachia nummularia Persicaria cf. hydropiperoides Yes No No No FAC FACW FACW OBL hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub - Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, 15 and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 81 = Total Cover Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Woody Vine Stratum Plot Size (30') Absolute % Cover Dominant Species Indicator Staus Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)

97 SOIL Sampling Point: DP5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Loc 2 Texture Y 5/ YR 4/4 5 C M silt loam Y 4/ YR 4/4 15 C M silt loam Remarks 1 Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains - 2 Location: PL=Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR,N Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gley Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) and weltand hydrology must be Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material ( F21) (MLRA 127, 147) present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric soil present? No Remarks:

98

99

100

101 DP 1 DP 2 WETLAND 1 P:\2011 Projects\ SaltRiverBank\Figures\PROSPECTUS\RW-water wetland, Water wetland, Eric Bowman, 7/10/ :20 PM DP1 LEGEND PROPOSED BANK SITE WETLAND DATA POINT WETLAND 3 DP 4 0 SCALE IN FEET DP 3 WETLAND 2 NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATER/WETLAND BOUNDARIES WERE DELINEATED AND SURVEYED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM EQUIPMENT BY REDWING WETLAND SCIENTISTS ON JANUARY 23, THESE BOUNDARIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. USE OF THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY SALT RIVER MITIGATION BANK BULLITT COUNTY, KENTUCKY REVISED DATE: DRAWN BY: BJD/EDB SOURCE: BASE MAP PROVIDED BY MINDEL, SCOTT AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE PREPARED BY: DELINEATION MAP FIGURE C1

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110