Village of Casselman 2018 Water and Wastewater Services Development Charges Background Study & Connection Charges Study

Transcription

1 Village of Casselman 2018 Water and Wastewater Services Development Charges Background Study & Connection Charges Study For Public Circulation and Comment April 20, 2018

2 Contents Page 1. Introduction Purpose of this Document Summary of the Process Current Village of Casselman D.C. and C.C. Policies Development Charges By-law Policies Capital Charge By-law Policies Anticipated Development in the Village of Casselman Requirements of the Act Basis of, Household, Employment, and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast Summary of Growth Forecast The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge Services Potentially Involved Local Service Policy Capital Forecast Treatment of Credits Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity Existing Reserve Funds Deductions Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions The 10% Reduction Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service Service Levels and Capital Costs for Water and Wastewater Servcies D.C. Calculation Wastewater Services Water Services Annual Operating Costs and Asset Management Plan Operating Cost Examination Asset Management Plan Development Charge Calculation Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules Development Charge By-law Structure Development Charge By-law Rules Payment in any Particular Case Determination of the Amount of the Charge Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

3 7.2.3 Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) Exemptions (full or partial) Phase in Provision(s) Timing of Collection Indexing Other Development Charge By-law Provisions Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes By-law In-force Date Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing Other Recommendations By-law Implementation Public Consultation Public Meeting of Council Other Consultation Activity Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development Implementation Requirements Notice of Passage By-law Pamphlet Appeals Complaints Credits Front-Ending Agreements Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Northwest Quadrant Capital Charge Calculation Introduction Municipal Act Fees and Charges Municipal Act Part XII Ontario Regulation 584/ Ontario Regulation 581/ Connection Charge Calculations Municipal Act Charge By-law Policy Recommendations Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast...A-1 Appendix B Morrison Hershfield Limited...B-1 Appendix C Proposed Development Charges By-law... C-1 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

4 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations D.C. D.C.A. E.S.A. G.F.A. mm N.F.P.O.W. O.M.B. O.Reg. para. P.P.U. R.S.O. sq.ft. s.s. Development Charge Development Charges Act Environmentally Safe Area Gross floor area Millimeters No fixed place of work Ontario Municipal Board Ontario Regulation Paragraph Persons per unit Revised Statute of Ontario Square foot Subsection Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

5 Page Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document This background study has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Development Charges Act, 1997 (s.10), and accordingly, recommends new development charges and policies for the Village of Casselman (Village). Moreover, this background study also includes the rationale and calculation of connection charges for privately serviced individuals connecting to the municipal water and wastewater systems. The Village retained (Watson) to undertake the development charges (D.C.) and connection charges (C.C.) study process in November The Village also retained the services of Morrison Hershfield Limited to prepare a Water and Sewer System Capital Investment Plan over the buildout forecast period for the municipally serviced area. Watson worked with senior staff of the Village, Morrison Hershfield Limited and Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in preparing this analysis and the policy recommendations. This background study, containing the proposed D.C. by-law, will be distributed to members of the public in order to provide interested parties with sufficient background information on the legislation, the study s recommendations and an outline of the basis for these recommendations. This report has been prepared, in the first instance, to meet the statutory requirements applicable to the Village s D.C. background study, as summarized in Chapter 4. It also addresses the forecast amount, type and location of growth (Chapter 3), the requirement for rules governing the imposition of the development charges (Chapter 7) and the proposed by-law to be made available as part of the approval process (Appendix D). In addition, the report is designed to set out sufficient background on the legislation, and the Village s current policies to make the exercise understandable to interested parties. Finally, the D.C. background study addresses post-adoption implementation requirements which are critical to the successful application of the new policy. The chapters in the report are supported by Appendices containing the data required to explain and substantiate the calculation of the charges. A full discussion of the statutory requirements for the preparation of a background study and calculation of a development charge is provided herein. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

6 Page Summary of the Process The public meeting required under Section 12 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, has been scheduled for May Its purpose is to present the study to the public and to solicit public input on the proposed D.C. and C.C. by-laws. The meeting is also being held to answer any questions regarding the study s purpose, methodology and the proposed policies. Figure 1-1 outlines the proposed schedule to be followed with respect to the D.C. and C.C. by-laws adoption process. In accordance with the D.C.A. legislation, the D.C. Background Study has been posted on the Village s website on April 20, 2018 (i.e. no later than 60 days prior to by-law passage), along with the proposed D.C. by-law. The process to be followed in finalizing the report and recommendations includes: consideration of responses received prior to, at or immediately following the public meeting; and finalization of the study and Council consideration of the by-laws in June Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

7 Page 1-3 Figure 1-1 Schedule of Key Development Charge Process Dates Process Steps Dates 1. Project initiation meetings with Village staff November Data collection, staff interviews, preparation of D.C. calculations 3. Preparation of D.C. and C.C. draft findings and review with Village staff 4. Statutory notice of Public Meeting advertisement placed in newspaper(s) by 5. Background study and proposed D.C. by-law available to public November - March, 2018 March, 2018 April 2018 April 20, Public Meeting of Council May Council considers adoption of background study and passage of by-laws 8. Newspaper notice given of D.C. by-law passage 9. Last day for D.C. by-law appeal 10. Village makes available D.C. pamphlet June 2018 By 20 days after passage 40 days after passage by 60 days after in force date Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

8 2. Current Village of Casselman D.C. and C.C. Policies 2.1 Development Charge By-law Policies D.C. By-law Enactment Page 2-4 On June 14, 2016, the Village of Casselman passed By-law under the Development Charges Act, The by-law came into on the same day and imposes municipal-wide development charges by service. The D.C. by-law does not impose charges for municipal water or wastewater services as capital charges and connection charges are imposed for that purpose Services Covered The following services are included under By-law : Roads and Related; Fire Protection; Municipal Parking; Parks and Recreation; Library; and Administration. The by-law provides for mandatory annual indexing of the charges. Table 2-1 provides the charges currently in effect, as well as a breakdown of the charges by service component. Table 2-1 Village of Casselman Current Development Charges Municipal Services Single and Semi- Detached Residential ($/dwelling unit) Apartment Bachelor 2+ and 1 Bedrooms Bedroom Other Multiples Non-Residential $ per sq ft of Gross Floor Area Road and Related Services $2,559 $1,521 $967 $1,724 $1.29 Fire Protection $1,024 $609 $387 $690 $0.51 Municipal Parking N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Parks and Recreation $397 $236 $ $267 $0.05 Library $243 $144 $92 $164 $0.03 Administration $700 $416 $265 $471 $0.38 Total $4,923 $2,926 $1,861 $3,316 $2.26 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

9 Page Timing of D.C. Calculation and Payment Development charges are due and payable in full to the Village on the date a building permit is issued for any land, buildings or structures affected by the applicable development charge. The by-law also allows the Village to enter into payment agreements with owners Redevelopment Credit The by-law provides DC credits for residential and non-residential redevelopments and/or conversion, provided the demolition/conversion occurs on a development that pre-exists 60 months prior to date of payment of the development charge Exemptions The Village s existing D.C. by-law includes statutory exemptions from payment of development charges with respect to: Industrial additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area of the building for industrial additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to development charges; Land used for Municipal or Board of Education purposes; and Residential development that results in only the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (as specified by O.Reg. 82/98). The D.C. by-law also provides non-statutory exemptions from payment of development charges with respect to: The development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide farm uses; A cemetery and burial ground exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act; and Development creating or adding an accessory use or structure not exceeding 10 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

10 Page Capital Charge By-law Policy By-law Enactment On May 23, 2017, the Village of Casselman passed By-law No , being a bylaw to recover the costs relating to the extension of sanitary sewer services to the area north west of the Nation River (i.e. the Northwest Quadrant Area). The by-law was passed under the authority of s.391 of the Municipal Act, which is the section of the Act respecting the fees and charges Services Covered The works underlying the sanitary sewer services to the area consisted of the construction of a pumping station, an extension of the sanitary sewer in the northwest quadrant of Nation River along Principale Street and connecting to the adjacent roads excluding Du Boise Street. The capital costs were based on the October 21, 2016 study prepared by J.L. Richards & Associates Ltd Capital Charges To recover the costs of sanitary sewer services for the area, a charge of $7,974 per unit was established for existing residential dwellings. For vacant land parcels within the defined benefitting area, a charge of $7,302 per unit was assigned. In addition to these charges, the cost of connection of the service to the home was the property owner's responsibility. The estimated cost for the service connection to a house was approximately $ to $170 per meter Payment Options The payment options relating to the recovery of the sanitary sewer costs for the area included: Option A: Full payment by December 31, 2017; or Option B: 3, 5 or 20 Year Installment Charge - Where option "A" is not elected, an annual charge will be imposed on the benefiting landowners. Interest will be applied when landowners elect to pay the charges on an instalment basis. To be eligible for the three-year instalment charge, the total cost to the property must have been less than $10,000. For the five-year instalment charge, the total cost to the property must have been between $10,001-$50,000. For the twenty-year Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

11 instalment charge, the total cost to the property must have been greater than $50, Connection Charge By-law Policy By-law Enactment Page 2-7 On April 28, 9, the Village of Casselman passed By-law No , being a bylaw to further amend by-law number 1-046, a by-law respecting building permits and inspections to reconfirm the water and sewage treatment connection fees and to reconfirm the improvement of the existing water distribution system and sanitary sewage collection system fees and to repeal by-law The by-law was passed under the authority of s.391 of the Municipal Act, which is the section of the Act respecting the fees and charges Services Covered The works underlying the water and sanitary sewage services consisted of water treatment, water distribution systems, sewage treatment and sewage collection systems in the municipally serviced area of the Village. The capital costs assessment was based on a study prepared by J.L. Richards & Associates Ltd Connection Charges To recover the costs of water and sanitary sewage services for the municipally serviced area, the following schedule of charges was provided in Tables I and II to the by-law. The water connection charges in Tables I and II of the by-law are provided for a singlefamily residence with 19 mm diameter water service connection. The sewage connection charges in Tables I and II of the by-law are provided for a residence with 125 mm diameter sewage service connection. For water and sewage service connection sizes exceeding the sizes listed in Tables I and II of the by-law, the treatment connection fees were determined by the Village Engineer in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act and the Ministry of the Environment Guidelines. Year Water Treatment Connection Fee ($) 1,456 1,500 1,545 Sewage Treatment Connection Fee ($) 1,333 3,344 5,505 Water Distribution System Fee ($) Sewage Collection System Fee ($) Total ($) 3,911 6,000 8,240 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

12 Page 2-8 Year Water Treatment Connection Fee ($) 1,591 1,639 1,688 1,738 1,791 1,844 1,900 1,957 2,015 2,076 2,138 2,202 2,268 2,337 2,407 2,479 2,553 2,630 Sewage Treatment Connection Fee ($) 5,670 5,840 6,015 6,195 6,381 6,572 6,770 6,973 7,182 7,397 7,619 7,848 8,084 8,326 8,576 8,833 9,098 9,371 Water Distribution System Fee ($) ,013 Sewage Collection System Fee ($) ,013 Total ($) 8,487 8,741 9,003 9,273 9,552 9,838 10,134 10,438 10,751 11,073 11,405 11,748 12,100 12,463 12,837 13,222 13,619 14, Payment Options The fees set out in Tables I and II of the by-law are applicable to the creation of new lots within the Village of Casselman or an approval of a zoning change, or the approval of new development. The connection charges for water and sanitary sewage treatment services, are payable in full at the application for a building permit. The connection charges for water distribution and sanitary sewage collection services are payable in full at the signature of a subdivision agreement, or the signature of a site plan agreement, or as a condition of the approval of a land severance, or at the time of an approval of a zoning change, or at an application for a building permit. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

13 3. Anticipated Development in the Village of Casselman 3.1 Requirements of the Act Page 3-1 Chapter 4 provides the methodology for calculating a development charge as per the Development Charges Act, Figure 4-1 presents this methodology graphically. It is noted in the first box of the schematic that in order to determine the development charge that may be imposed, it is a requirement of Section 5 (1) of the Development Charges Act that the anticipated amount, type and location of development, for which development charges can be imposed, must be estimated. The growth forecast contained in this chapter (with supplemental tables in Appendix A) provides for the anticipated development for which the Village of Casselman will be required to provide services, over a 10-year (early 2018 to early 2028) and longer-term (early 2018 to mid 2036) time horizon. 3.2 Basis of, Household, Employment, and Non- Residential Gross Floor Area Forecast The D.C. growth forecast has been derived from the Official Plan for the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, In compiling the growth forecast, the following additional information sources were also consulted to help assess residential and nonresidential development potential for the Village over the forecast period, including: A review of historical development activity as well as the supply of units identified in the development approvals process; and Discussions with staff regarding the anticipated residential and non-residential development trends for the Village of Casselman. 3.3 Summary of Growth Forecast A detailed analysis of the residential and non-residential growth forecasts is provided in Appendix A. The discussion provided herein summarizes the anticipated growth for the Village and describes the basis for the forecast. The results of the residential growth forecast analysis are summarized in Figure 3-1 below, and Schedule 1 in Appendix A. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

14 Figure 3-1 Household Formation-Based and Household Forecast Model Page 3-2 DEMAND SUPPLY Historical Housing Construction Employment Market by Local Municipality, Economic Outlook Local, County and Provincial Forecast of Residential Units Residential Units in the Development Process Intensification Designated Lands Servicing Capacity Occupancy Assumptions Gross Increase Decline in Existing Net Increase As identified in Table 3-1 and Schedule 1, the Village s population is anticipated to reach approximately 4,260 by 2028 and 5,030 by This represents an increase of 700 persons and 1,470 persons, respectively, over the 10-year and longer-term forecast periods. The population forecast summarized in Schedule 1 excludes the net Census undercount, which is estimated at approximately 3.5%. The Census undercount represents the net number of persons missed during Census enumeration. In calculating the D.C. for the Village of Casselman, the net Census undercount has been excluded from the growth forecast. Accordingly, all references provided herein to the population forecast exclude the net Census undercount. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

15 Page 3-3 In addition to the anticipated development contained herein, and provided in detail in Appendix A, it is anticipated that and additional 111 single detached equivalent units (313 population) and 3,682 square meters of non-residential building gross floor area that are currently existing and occupied will be connected to the municipal wastewater system (i.e. Drainage Area 14). Recognizing the wastewater service benefits provided to these occupied developments when connected, and the inclusion of their service demands in the capital needs forecast, these developments have been added to the anticipated development in the calculation of the wastewater services development charge. Provided below is a summary of the key assumptions and findings regarding the Village of Casselman D.C. growth forecast. 1. Unit Mix (Appendix A Schedules 1 through 6) 2. Planning Period The unit mix for the Village was derived from historical development activity (as per Schedule 6), active development applications (as per Schedule 5), and discussions with planning staff regarding anticipated development trends for the Village. Based on the above, the long-term ( ) household growth forecast is comprised of a housing unit mix of approximately 56% low density (single detached and semi-detached), 10% medium density (multiples except apartments) and 34% high density (bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2+ bedroom apartments). Short-term and longer-term time horizons are required for the D.C. process. The D.C.A. limits the planning horizon for certain services, such as parks, recreation and libraries, to a ten-year planning horizon. Services related to a highway, police and fire services utilize a longer planning horizon, and water, wastewater and stormwater services utilize a longer urban forecast period. 3. in New Units (Appendix A - Schedules 2 through 8) The number of housing units to be constructed in the Village of Casselman during the short-term and long-term periods is presented on Figure 3-2. Over the forecast period the Village is anticipated to average 38 new housing units per year. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

16 Page 3-4 Table 3-1 Village of Casselman Residential Growth Forecast Summary Historical Forecast Incremental Year Including Census Undercount 1 Excluding Census Undercount Institutional Excluding Institutional Singles & Semi- Detached Housing Units Multiple Dwellings 2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Person Per Unit (PPU) Mid 1 3,010 2, , , Mid 6 3,410 3, , , Mid ,750 3, ,500 1, , Mid ,670 3, ,440 1, , Early ,680 3, ,451 1, , Early ,410 4, ,130 1, , Mid , 5, ,875 1, , Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid ,520 1, , Source:, Census Undercount estimated at approximately 3.5%. Note: Including the Undercount has been rounded. 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background Study.docx

17 Page 3-5 in new units is derived from Schedules 2, 3, and 4, which incorporate historical development activity, anticipated units (see unit mix discussion) and average persons per unit by dwelling type for new units Schedule 8 summarizes the average number of persons per unit (P.P.U.) for the new housing units by age and type of dwelling, based on 2011 custom Census data for the Village. Due to data limitations, P.P.U. s were derived from the United Counties of Prescott and Russel as outlined in Schedule 8. The total calculated P.P.U. for all density types has been adjusted to account for the downward P.P.U. trend which has been recently experienced in both new and older units, largely due to the aging of the population. Adjusted 20-year average P.P.U. s by dwelling type are as follows: Low density: Medium density: High density: Existing Units and Change (Appendix A - Schedules 2, 3, and 4) Existing households as of 2018 are based on the 2016 Census households, plus estimated residential units constructed between 2016 and 2017, assuming a 6-month lag between construction and occupancy (see Schedule 1). The decline in average occupancy levels for existing housing units is calculated in Schedules 3 through 5, by aging the existing population over the forecast period. The forecast population decline in existing households over the 2018 to 2036 forecast period is estimated at approximately Employment (Appendix A, Schedules 10a through 12) Employment projections are largely based on the activity rate method, which is defined as the number of jobs in the Village divided by the number of residents. Key employment sectors include primary, industrial, commercial/ population-related, institutional, and work at home, which are considered individually below. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

18 Page 3-6 Figure 3-2 Village of Casselman Historical and Forecast Annual Housing Activity Housing Units Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity (7-2017) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB 2018 housing growth derived by Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year. H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background Study.docx

19 Page 3-7 The Village s employment base by place of work is outlined in Schedule 10a. The 2011 employment base is comprised of the following sectors: 30 primary (approx. 2%); 55 work at home employment (approx. 3%); 210 industrial (approx. 12%) 895 commercial/population-related (approx. 52%); and 535 institutional (approx. 31%). The 2016 employment base by usual place of work, including work at home, is approximately 1,725 jobs. This figure is anticipated to reach approximately 2,255 by 2028 and 2,450 by Schedule 10b, Appendix A, summarizes the employment forecast, excluding work at home employment, which is the basis for the D.C.A. employment forecast. The impact on municipal services from work at home employees has already been included in the population forecast. Accordingly, work at home employees have been removed from the D.C.A. employment forecast and calculation. Total employment for the Village of Casselman (excluding work at home employment) is anticipated to reach approximately 2, by 2028 and 2,330 by This represents an employment increase of 460 and 650 additional jobs over the 10-year and longer-term forecast periods, respectively. 6. Non-Residential Sq.ft. Estimates (Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.)), Appendix A, Schedule 10b) Square footage estimates were calculated in Schedule 9b based on the following employee density assumptions: 2 1,100 sq.ft. per employee for industrial; 550 sq.ft. per employee for commercial/population-related; and 900 sq.ft. per employee for institutional employment. The Municipal-wide incremental non-residential G.F.A. increase is anticipated to be approximately 368,700 sq.ft. over the 10-year forecast period and 496,100 sq.ft. over the longer-term forecast period Employment is based on Statistics Canada 2011 Places of Work Employment dataset. 2 Based on employment surveys. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

20 Page 3-2 In terms of percentage growth, the longer-term incremental G.F.A. forecast by sector is broken down as follows: industrial approx. 41%; commercial/population-related approx. 39%; and institutional approx. 20%. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

21 4. The Approach to the Calculation of the Charge Page 4-1 This chapter addresses the requirements of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A., 1997 with respect to the establishment of the need for service which underpins the development charge calculation. These requirements are illustrated schematically in Figure Services Potentially Involved The D.C. Background Study and By-Law has been undertaken for municipal water and wastewater services only. All other permissible services for which development charges may be imposed have been considered in the Villages 2016 D.C. Background Study and By-Law Local Service Policy The development charge calculation commences with an estimate of the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development, for each service to be covered by the by-law. There must be some form of link or attribution between the anticipated development and the estimated increase in the need for service. While the need could conceivably be expressed generally in terms of units of capacity, s.s.5(1)3, which requires that Municipal Council indicate that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met, suggests that a project-specific expression of need would be most appropriate. Some of the need for services generated by additional development consists of local services related to a plan of subdivision. As such, they will be required as a condition of subdivision agreements or consent conditions. For the purposes of determining the D.C. eligible increase in need for services, local services for water and wastewater services are defined as: Wastewater Services - sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller, and pump stations servicing sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller, are considered to be a local service and recovered directly from developers when internal to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates. Water Services watermains of mm diameter and smaller are considered to be local service and recovered directly from developers when internal to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

22 Figure 4-1 The Process of Calculating a Development Charge under the Act Page 4-2 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

23 Page Capital Forecast Paragraph 7 of s.s.5(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services must be estimated. The Act goes on to require two potential cost reductions and the Regulation sets out the way in which such costs are to be presented. These requirements are outlined below. These estimates involve capital costing of the increased services discussed above. This entails costing actual projects or the provision of service units, depending on how each service has been addressed. The capital costs include: a) costs to acquire land or an interest therein (including a leasehold interest); b) costs to improve land; c) costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures; d) costs to acquire, lease or improve facilities including rolling stock (with a useful life of 7 or more years), furniture and equipment (other than computer equipment), materials acquired for library circulation, reference or information purposes; e) interest on money borrowed to pay for the above-referenced costs; f) costs to undertake studies in connection with the above-referenced matters; and g) costs of the development charge background study. In order for an increase in need for service to be included in the D.C. calculation, Municipal Council must indicate...that it intends to ensure that such an increase in need will be met (s.s.5(1)3). This can be done if the increase in service forms part of a Council-approved Official Plan, capital forecast or similar expression of the intention of Council (O.Reg. 82/98 s.3). The capital program contained herein reflects the Village s approved and proposed capital budgets and master servicing/needs studies. 4.4 Treatment of Credits Section 8 para. 5 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that a development charge background study must set out, the estimated value of credits that are being carried forward relating to the service. s.s.17 para. 4 of the same Regulation indicates that,...the value of the credit cannot be recovered from future development charges, if the credit pertains to an ineligible service. This implies that a credit for eligible services can be recovered from future development charges. As a result, this provision should be made in the calculation, in order to avoid a funding shortfall with respect to future service needs. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

24 Page 4-4 The Village currently has no outstanding credit obligations, however for wastewater services project CC1, i.e. the Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain, a portion of the project cost was financed upfront by Casselman Developments (Drainage Area 13 as defined in Figure 3 of the Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited). As such, the remaining capital cost share for this project will be not included in the D.C. calculation for Drainage Area Eligible Debt and Committed Excess Capacity Section 66 of the D.C.A., 1997 states that for the purposes of developing a development charge by-law, a debt incurred with respect to an eligible service may be included as a capital cost, subject to any limitations or reductions in the Act. Similarly, s.18 of O.Reg. 82/98 indicates that debt with respect to an ineligible service may be included as a capital cost, subject to several restrictions. In order for such costs to be eligible, two conditions must apply. First, they must have funded excess capacity which is able to meet service needs attributable to the anticipated development. Second, the excess capacity must be committed, that is, either before or at the time it was created, Council must have expressed a clear intention that it would be paid for by development charges or other similar charges. For example, this may have been done as part of previous development charge processes. As Council passed by-laws intending to recover the capital costs for wastewater services projects Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain and Principale St. Sanitary Sewer, this represents a reasonable expression of Council committing this excess capacity for recovery under the development charges by-law. 4.6 Existing Reserve Funds Section 35 of the D.C.A. states that: The money in a reserve fund established for a service may be spent only for capital costs determined under paragraphs 2 to 8 of subsection 5(1). There is no explicit requirement under the D.C.A. calculation method set out in s.s.5(1) to net the outstanding reserve fund balance as part of making the D.C. calculation; however, s.35 does restrict the way in which the funds are used in future. The Village currently has not uncommitted reserve funds for water and wastewater services that have been applied in the calculation of the development charges. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

25 Page Deductions The D.C.A., 1997 potentially requires that five deductions be made to the increase in the need for service. These relate to: the level of service ceiling; uncommitted excess capacity; benefit to existing development; anticipated grants, subsidies and other contributions; and a 10% reduction for certain services. The requirements behind each of these reductions are addressed as follows: Reduction Required by Level of Service Ceiling This is designed to ensure that the increase in need included in 4.2 does not include an increase that would result in the level of service (for the additional development increment) exceeding the average level of the service provided in the Village over the 10-year period immediately preceding the preparation of the background study O.Reg (s.4) goes further to indicate that, both the quantity and quality of a service shall be taken into account in determining the level of service and the average level of service. In many cases, this can be done by establishing a quantity measure in terms of units as floor area, land area or road length per capita, and a quality measure in terms of the average cost of providing such units based on replacement costs, engineering standards or recognized performance measurement systems, depending on circumstances. When the quantity and quality factor are multiplied together, they produce a measure of the level of service, which meets the requirements of the Act, i.e. cost per unit Reduction for Uncommitted Excess Capacity Paragraph 5 of s.s.5(1) requires a deduction from the increase in the need for service attributable to the anticipated development that can be met using the Village s excess capacity, other than excess capacity which is committed (discussed above in 4.6). Excess capacity is undefined, but in this case must be able to meet some or all of the increase in need for service, in order to potentially represent a deduction. The deduction of uncommitted excess capacity from the future increase in the need for Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

26 Page 4-6 service, would normally occur as part of the conceptual planning and feasibility work associated with justifying and sizing new facilities, e.g. if a road widening to accommodate increased traffic is not required because sufficient excess capacity is already available, then widening would not be included as an increase in need, in the first instance Reduction for Benefit to Existing Development This step involves a further reduction to the need, by the extent to which such an increase in service would benefit existing development. The level of services cap in section 4.4 is related but is not the identical requirement. Wastewater, stormwater and water trunks are highly localized to growth areas and can be more readily allocated in this regard than other services such as roads which do not have a fixed service area. The servicing study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited provides the benefit to existing deductions provided for each capital project Reduction for Anticipated Grants, Subsidies and Other Contributions This step involves reducing the capital costs necessary to provide the increased services by capital grants, subsidies and other contributions made or anticipated by Council and in accordance with various rules such as the attribution between the share related to new vs. existing development O.Reg , s.6. Where grant programs do not allow funds to be applied to growth-related capital needs, the proceeds can be applied to the non-growth share of the project exclusively. Moreover, Gas Tax revenues are typically used to fund non-growth-related works or the non-growth share of D.C. projects, given that the contribution is not being made in respect of particular growth-related capital projects. Grant funding secured for the wastewater services projects: Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain (project CC1), Principale St. Sanitary Sewer (project CC2a), Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade (project 3a and 3b) have been applied proportionately for the growth-related and non-growth cost shares. In total the D.C. recoverable costs for wastewater services have been reduced by approximately $1.9 million in grant funding. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

27 Page The 10% Reduction Paragraph 8 of s.s.(1) of the D.C.A. requires that, the capital costs must be reduced by 10 percent. This paragraph does not apply to water supply services, wastewater services, stormwater drainage and control services, services related to a highway, police and fire protection services. The primary services that the 10% reduction does apply to include services such as parks and recreation, libraries, childcare/social services, ambulance, homes for the aged, health and transit. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

28 Page Development Charge Eligible Cost Analysis by Service This chapter outlines the basis for calculating development charge eligible costs for water and wastewater services to be applied on a municipal service area basis. The required calculation process set out in s.5(1) paragraphs 2 to 8 in the D.C.A., 1997, and described in Chapter 4, was followed in determining D.C. eligible costs. Morrison Hershfield Limited was commissioned to analyze the capacity of the existing communal water and sanitary systems for current and projected flows, and to develop a program of growth-related water and sewer capital project needs to The capital costs are contained in the Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited, and is provided in detail in Appendix B. The nature of the capital projects and timing identified in this chapter reflects Council s current intention. However, over time, municipal projects and Council priorities change and, accordingly, Council s intentions may alter and different capital projects (and timing) may be required to meet the need for services required by new growth. 5.1 Service Levels and Capital Costs for the Water and Wastewater Services D.C. Calculation This section evaluates the development-related capital requirements for water and wastewater services over the forecast period ( ) Wastewater Services The study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited considers the components of the wastewater and sanitary systems affected by system growth over the forecast period to These components include sewage treatment lagoons, sewage lift stations and pump stations, and trunk sewers (main sewer run from south of Highway 417 to Pump Station 1, and main sewer run from northwest extent of Village to Pump Station 6). The analysis measured service capacity of these components over the period to 2013, where utilization of linear infrastructure or pumping stations exceed 80% of capacity, upgrades were proposed. This approach ensures that sufficient time is available to design and construct upgrades and maintains a margin of reserve capacity at all times. Upgrades will typically be sized for ultimate flows, unless a smaller upgrade are warranted (e.g. where a very large increase in capacity will ultimately be required). For Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

29 Page 5-2 treatment plants, upgrades were identified with consideration of the forecast rate of flow increase. Within the capital program, upgrade design expenditures are scheduled to occur in the year in which the need for upgrade is identified. Construction expenditures are scheduled in the following year. The wastewater services capital program is summarized in Table 5-1, with the detailed program provided in Appendix B. The proposed program are designed to meet growthrelated increase in capital needs to In determining the D.C. eligible portion of the capital costs, deductions were made for local services, post period benefits, and benefits to existing development. These deductions were determined as follows: Local Service: sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller and pump stations servicing sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller. Post Period Benefit: the percentage of the capacity of an upgrade (or piece of new infrastructure) which will not be utilized until after Benefit to Existing: the portion of the cost of a project which would be required regardless of growth (e.g. asset renewal). In total the gross capital costs for wastewater services over the forecast period total approximately $14.8 million. The capital costs for project CC1 (Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain) reflect the remaining unfunded capital costs net of the portion of the project cost upfront financed by Casselman Developments (Drainage Area 13, as defined in Figure 3 of the Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited). As such, the capital costs for this project will be not included in the D.C. calculation for Drainage Area 13. Approximately $3.3 million in capital costs have been deducted as a local service. Project CC2b, sanitary sewers on Sarah, Filion, Martin, Maria, Francess Streets, total approximately $1.7 million of the local services and will be recovered directly from the benefiting properties through the connection charges described in a subsequent section of this report. The remaining $1.6 million in local services will be emplaced directly by the developers in the area as a condition of development agreements. A further $4.4 million has been deducted as a post period benefit. This share of the capital cost reflects the anticipated increase in need from future development beyond These capital costs will be considered in future D.C. background studies as the Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

30 Page 5-3 anticipated development period evolves. Also, a deduction of approximately $1.9 million has been applied to the capital program reflecting grant funding secured by the Village towards the growth-related cost share of project CC1 (Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain), project CC2a (Principale St. Sanitary Sewer), and projects 3a and 3b (Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrades). In total the D.C. recoverable capital costs for wastewater services total $5.2 million. The net D.C. recoverable costs for wastewater services have been allocated between future residential and non-residential development on the basis of incremental residential and non-residential design flows. As a result, an allocation D.C. recoverable costs of 83% residential and 17% non-residential has been applied Water Services The study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited considers the components of the wastewater and sanitary systems affected by system growth over the forecast period to These components include water treatment plant, water storage (elevated tank), and trunk watermains. The analysis measured service capacity of these components over the period to 2013, where utilization of linear infrastructure or pumping stations exceed 80% of capacity, upgrades were proposed. This approach ensures that sufficient time is available to design and construct upgrades and maintains a margin of reserve capacity at all times. Upgrades will typically be sized for ultimate flows, unless a smaller upgrade are warranted (e.g. where a very large increase in capacity will ultimately be required). For treatment plants, upgrades were identified with consideration of the forecast rate of flow increase. Within the capital program, upgrade design expenditures are scheduled to occur in the year in which the need for upgrade is identified. Construction expenditures are scheduled in the following year. The water services capital program is summarized in Table 5-2, with the detailed program provided in Appendix B. The proposed program is designed to meet growthrelated increase in capital needs to In determining the D.C. eligible portion of the capital costs, deductions were made for local services, post period benefits, and benefits to existing development. These deductions were determined as follows: Local Service: watermains of mm diameter and smaller. Post Period Benefit: the percentage of the capacity of an upgrade (or piece of new infrastructure) which will not be utilized until after Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

31 Page 5-4 Benefit to Existing: the portion of the cost of a project which would be required regardless of growth (e.g. asset renewal). In total the gross capital costs for water services over the forecast period total approximately $4.8 million. Approximately $0.7 million in capital costs have been deducted as a local service to be emplaced directly by the developers in the area as a condition of development agreements. A further $1.4 million has been deducted as a post period benefit, reflecting the anticipated increase in need from future development beyond These capital costs will be considered in future D.C. background studies as the anticipated development period evolves. A deduction of approximately $0.6 million has been applied to the capital program reflecting the benefit to existing arising from the capital program. In total the D.C. recoverable capital costs for water services total $1.7 million. The net D.C. recoverable costs for water services have been allocated between future residential and non-residential development on the basis of incremental residential and non-residential design flows. As a result, an allocation D.C. recoverable costs of 81% residential and 19% non-residential has been applied.. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

32 Page 5-5 Table 5-1 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation Wastewater Services WASTEWATER SERVICE (excluding Drainage Area 13) Project No. Name Description Phase Diameter (mm) Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Year Gross Capital Cost Local Service Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Subsidies and Other Contributions Grants Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share CC1 Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain Casselman Developments Front-Ended works (PS6 and Forcemain to PS1) - Village Cost Share Only $ 713,179 $ - $ 463,567 $ - $ - $ 74,884 $ 174,729 $ 132,148 $ 42,581 WASTEWATER SERVICE Project No. Name Description Phase Diameter (mm) Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Year Gross Capital Cost Local Service Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Subsidies and Other Contributions Grants Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share CC2a Sanitary Sewer Principale St $ 1,217,497 $ - $ 949,648 $ - $ - $ 80,355 $ 187,495 $ 155,159 $ 32,336 CC2b Sanitary Sewer Sarah, Filion, Martin, Maria, Francess Streets 2017 $ 1,691,430 $ 1,691,430 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3a Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade Design 2019 $ 518,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 154,491 $ 363,509 $ 300,817 $ 62,692 Cost estimate from 2017 Class EA 3b Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade Construction 2020 $ 5,182,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,545,509 $ 3,636,491 $ 3,009,329 $ 627,162 5a Pump Station 1 Upgrade Capacity increase (pump station upgrade Design 2021 $ 9,000 $ - $ 6,120 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,880 $ 2,383 $ 497 5b Pump Station 1 Upgrade assumed) Construction $ 95,000 $ - $ 64,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,400 $ 25,157 $ 5,243 6a Forcemain for Pump Station 1 Design 400 1, $ 149,000 $ - $ 101,320 $ - $ - $ - $ 47,680 $ 39,457 $ 8,223 Second forcemain 6b Forcemain for Pump Station 1 Construction 400 1, $ 1,485,000 $ - $ 1,009,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 475, $ 393,245 $ 81,955 7a Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) Design 2022 $ 74,000 $ 59,000 $ 4,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 10, $ 8,441 $ 1,759 7b Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) Nation View Village development + oversizing Construction $ 384,000 $ 322,000 $ 19,840 $ - $ - $ - $ 42,160 $ 34,889 $ 7,271 7c Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) Construction $ 356,000 $ 331,000 $ 8,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 17,000 $ 14,068 $ 2,932 9a Pump Station 2 Upgrade Capacity increase (pump station replacement Design 2027 $ 84,000 $ 84,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 9b Pump Station 2 Upgrade assumed due to large increase) Construction $ 841,000 $ 841,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 10a Pump Station 5 Upgrade Design 2027 $ 3,000 $ - $ 2,535 $ - $ - $ - $ 465 $ 385 $ 80 Capacity increase (installation of new pumps) 10b Pump Station 5 Upgrade Construction $ 26,000 $ - $ 21,970 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,030 $ 3,335 $ a Pump Station 7 Upgrade New pump station to service development south Design 2031 $ 118,000 $ - $ 107,616 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,384 $ 8,593 $ 1,791 12b Pump Station 7 Upgrade of Hwy 417 Construction $ 1,180,000 $ - $ 1,076,160 $ - $ - $ - $ 103,840 $ 85,931 $ 17,909 13a Sanitary sewer (Hwy 700) Design 2031 $ 59,000 $ - $ 48,380 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,620 $ 8,788 $ 1,832 Servicing development south of Hwy b Sanitary sewer (Hwy 700) Construction $ 585,000 $ - $ 479,700 $ - $ - $ - $ 105,300 $ 87,140 $ 18,160 15a Pump Station 6 Upgrade Design 2035 $ 6,000 $ - $ 5,724 $ - $ - $ - $ 276 $ 228 $ 48 Capacity increase (installation of new pumps) 15b Pump Station 6 Upgrade Construction $ 57,000 $ - $ 54,378 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,622 $ 2,170 $ 452 TOTAL $ 14,119,927 $ 3,328,430 $ 3,960,591 $ - $ - $ 1,780,355 $ 5,050,552 $ 4,179,515 $ 871,036 H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background Study.docx

33 WATER SERVICE Project No. Table 5-2 Infrastructure Costs Covered in the D.C. Calculation Water Services Name Description Phase Diameter (mm) Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Year Gross Capital Cost Local Service Post Period Benefit Benefit to Existing Development Subsidies and Other Contributions Grants Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share Page 5-6 D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share 1 Water distribution network modelling Confirm water tower upgrade requirement and distribution system capacity Design 2019 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 40,534 $ 9,466 2a Water Tower Capacity Upgrade Design 2019 $ 135,000 $ 52,262 $ - $ - $ - $ 82,738 $ 67,074 $ 15,664 Second elevated tank 2b Water Tower Capacity Upgrade Construction $ 1,351,000 $ 523,005 $ - $ - $ - $ 827,995 $ 671,241 $ 156,754 4a Highlift Pump Upgrade Installation of additional pump (assumed that Design 2019 $ 21,000 $ 5,250 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,750 $ 12,768 $ 2,982 4b Highlift Pump Upgrade electrical/building modifications required) Construction $ 212,000 $ 53,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 159,000 $ 128,899 $ 30,101 8a Watermain (Brisson-Laurier) Design 2022 $ 72,000 $ 57,000 $ 4,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 10, $ 8,269 $ 1,931 Nation View Village development + oversizing 8b Watermain (Brisson-Laurier) Construction $ 721,000 $ 625,000 $ 30,720 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,280 $ 52,921 $ 12,359 11a Water Distribution System Upsizing Capacity increase for main water distribution Design 2028 $ 104,000 $ 21,066 $ 59,000 $ - $ - $ 23,934 $ 19,403 $ 4,531 11b Water Distribution System Upsizing system Construction $ 1,040,000 $ 211,595 $ 588,000 $ - $ - $ 240,405 $ 194,892 $ 45,513 14a Watermain (South of Hwy 417) Design 2031 $ 100,000 $ 82,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 18,000 $ 14,592 $ 3,408 Servicing development south of Hwy b Watermain (South of Hwy 417) Construction 300 1, $ 1,003,000 $ 822,460 $ - $ - $ - $ 180,540 $ 146,361 $ 34,179 TOTAL $ 4,809,000 $ 682,000 $ 1,806,157 $ 647,000 $ - $ - $ 1,673,843 $ 1,356,955 $ 316,888 H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background Study.docx

34 Page Annual Operating Costs and Asset Management Plan Operating Cost Examination As a requirement of the Development Charges Act, 1997 under subsection 10(2)(c), an analysis must be undertaken to assess the long-term capital and operating cost impacts for the capital infrastructure projects identified within the development charge. As part of this analysis, it was deemed necessary to isolate the incremental operating expenditures directly associated with these capital projects, factor in cost savings attributable to economies of scale or cost sharing where applicable and prorate the cost on a per unit basis. This was undertaken through a review of the Village s 2016 Financial Information Return. Table 5-3 Operating Expenditure Impacts for Future Capital Expenditures SERVICE ANNUAL LIFECYCLE EXPENDITURES ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 1. Water Services 348,537 45, , Wastewater Services 111,649 25, ,867 Total 460,186 70, ,668 Table 5-3 depicts the annual operating impact resulting from the proposed gross capital projects at the time they are all in place. It is important to note that, while municipal program expenditures will increase with growth in population, the costs associated with the new infrastructure would be delayed until the time these works are in place Asset Management Plan The Village s 2014 Asset Management Plan (AMP) includes Roads, Water and Wastewater Services. The Plan recommends an increase in annual capital funding for these services over the 10-year period to address the existing infrastructure deficits. For transportation services (including roads, street lighting, and maintenance of fleet and buildings), the Asset Management Plan identified an annual deficit of $308,000. Table 5-4 summarizes the additional capital funding requirements for the growth-related capital needs to be funded from the D.C. by-law at full emplacement. Based on the annual lifecycle costs, the increase for water and wastewater services would be approximately $885,096 including annualized debt financing of interim financing obligations beyond Based on forecast per capita user fee revenues to 2036 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

35 Page 5-8 (assuming no increase in user fees) the additional annual lifecycle costs would not increase the amount of funding required beyond current AMP levels, i.e. the annual user fee revenues as current rates would more than offset these lifecycle costs. Therefore, this higher level of lifecycle funding requirement as a result of the D.C. program in the future would appear to be within sustainable levels. Table 5-4 Village of Casselman Annual Incremental Lifecycle Costs for D.C. Recoverable Capital Needs Sub-Total 2036 Total Expenditures (Annualized) Annual Debt Payment on Non-Growth Related Capital 1 $33,373 Annual Debt Payment on Post Period Capital 2 $321,365 Lifecycle: Annual Lifecycle - Water Services $348,537 Annual Lifecycle - Wastewater Services $111,649 Sub-Total - Annual Lifecycle $460,186 $460,186 Incremental Operating Costs (for D.C. Services) $70,482 Total Expenditures $885,406 Revenue (Annualized) Incremental Non-Tax Revenue (User Fees) $985,249 Total Revenues $985,249 Net Revenues $99,843 1 Non-Growth Related component of projects includes benefit to existing cost share 2 Interim Debt Financing for Post Period Benefit 3 As per Sch. 10 of FIR Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

36 Page Development Charge Calculation Table 6-1 calculates the proposed development charge for water services to be imposed on anticipated development in the municipally serviced area of the Village over the forecast period to Tables 6-2 and 6-3 calculate the proposed development charges for wastewater services to be imposed on anticipated development in the municipally serviced area of the Village, and in the municipally serviced area excluding Drainage Area 13 respectively, over the same planning horizon to The calculation for residential development is generated on a per capita basis and is based upon four forms of housing types (single and semi-detached, apartments 2+ bedrooms, bachelor and 1 bedroom apartments, and other multiples). The nonresidential development charge has been calculated on a per square metre of gross floor area basis for commercial, industrial and institutional development. The D.C. eligible costs for each service component are provided in Chapter 5 for all municipal services, based on their proposed capital programs. For the residential calculations, the total cost is divided by the gross (new resident) population to determine the per capita amount. The eligible D.C. cost calculations are based on the net anticipated population increase (the forecast new unit population less the anticipated decline in existing units). The cost per capita is then multiplied by the average occupancy of the new units (Appendix A) to calculate the charge. With respect to non-residential development, the total costs (based on need for service) have been divided by the anticipated development over the planning period to calculate a cost per sq.mt. of gross floor area. Table 6-4 summarizes the calculated maximum development charges that could be imposed by Council by residential dwelling type and non-residential gross floor area. Table 6-5 compares the Village s existing capital charges and connection charges for water and wastewater services to the charges proposed herein, for single detached residential development. For single detached residential dwellings, the calculated charges represent a decrease of $9,248-$9,540 per unit for development in the Northwest Quadrant Area. For development outside the Northwest Quadrant Area the calculated charges represent a decrease of $ per unit $1,946. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

37 Page 6-2 Table 6-1 Development Charge Calculation Water Services Project No. Name Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share 1 Water distribution network modelling $ 50,000 $ 40,534 $ 9,466 2a Water Tower Capacity Upgrade $ 82,738 $ 67,074 $ 15,664 2b Water Tower Capacity Upgrade $ 827,995 $ 671,241 $ 156,754 4a Highlift Pump Upgrade $ 15,750 $ 12,768 $ 2,982 4b Highlift Pump Upgrade $ 159,000 $ 128,899 $ 30,101 8a Watermain (Brisson-Laurier) $ 10, $ 8,269 $ 1,931 8b Watermain (Brisson-Laurier) $ 65,280 $ 52,921 $ 12,359 11a Water Distribution System Upsizing $ 23,934 $ 19,403 $ 4,531 11b Water Distribution System Upsizing $ 240,405 $ 194,892 $ 45,513 14a Watermain (South of Hwy 417) $ 18,000 $ 14,592 $ 3,408 14b Watermain (South of Hwy 417) $ 180,540 $ 146,361 $ 34,179 $ 1,673,843 $ 1,356,955 $ 316,888 Incremental /GFA 1,634 46,089 DC per Capita $ 830 DC per SDU/Sq.Mt. of GFA $ 2,342 $ 6.88 Table 6-2 Development Charge Calculation Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) Project No. Name Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share CC1 Northwest Quadrant Pump Station and Forcemain $ 174,729 $ 132,148 $ 42,581 Incremental /GFA 1,276 46,089 DC per Capita $ 104 DC per SDU/Sq.Mt. of GFA $ 292 $ 0.92 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

38 Page 6-3 Table 6-3 Development Charge Calculation Wastewater Services Project No. Name Net D.C. Recoverable Cost D.C. Recoverable Residential Cost Share D.C. Recoverable Non-Residential Cost Share CC2a Sanitary Sewer $ 187,495 $ 155,159 $ 32,336 CC2b Sanitary Sewer $ - $ - $ - 3a Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade $ 363,509 $ 300,817 $ 62,692 3b Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade $ 3,636,491 $ 3,009,329 $ 627,162 5a Pump Station 1 Upgrade $ 2,880 $ 2,383 $ 497 5b Pump Station 1 Upgrade $ 30,400 $ 25,157 $ 5,243 6a Forcemain for Pump Station 1 $ 47,680 $ 39,457 $ 8,223 6b Forcemain for Pump Station 1 $ 475, $ 393,245 $ 81,955 7a Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) $ 10, $ 8,441 $ 1,759 7b Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) $ 42,160 $ 34,889 $ 7,271 7c Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) $ 17,000 $ 14,068 $ 2,932 9a Pump Station 2 Upgrade $ - $ - $ - 9b Pump Station 2 Upgrade $ - $ - $ - 10a Pump Station 5 Upgrade $ 465 $ 385 $ 80 10b Pump Station 5 Upgrade $ 4,030 $ 3,335 $ a Pump Station 7 Upgrade $ 10,384 $ 8,593 $ 1,791 12b Pump Station 7 Upgrade $ 103,840 $ 85,931 $ 17,909 13a Sanitary sewer (Hwy 700) $ 10,620 $ 8,788 $ 1,832 13b Sanitary sewer (Hwy 700) $ 105,300 $ 87,140 $ 18,160 15a Pump Station 6 Upgrade $ 276 $ 228 $ 48 15b Pump Station 6 Upgrade $ 2,622 $ 2,170 $ 452 $ 5,050,552 $ 4,179,515 $ 871,036 Incremental /GFA 2,012 46,089 DC per Capita $ 2,077 DC per SDU/Sq.Mt. of GFA $ 5,858 $ Table 6-4 Schedule of Development Charges Water and Wastewater Services Single and Semi- Detached Dwellings Residential Non-Residential Apartments - 2 Apartments - Bedrooms and Bachelor and 1 Larger Bedroom Other Multiples Per sq.mt. of GFA Service Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $5,858 $2,851 $2,627 $4,411 $18.90 Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $6, $2,993 $2,758 $4,631 $19.82 Water Services $2,342 $1,140 $1,050 $1,763 $6.88 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $8, $3,991 $3,677 $6,174 $25.77 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $8,492 $4,133 $3,808 $6,394 $26.70 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

39 Table 6-5 Comparison of Current Capital Charges/Connection Charges and Calculated Development Charges (per single detached unit) Wastewater Services Water Services Total NW Quadrant Current Connection Charges Northwest Quadrant Area - Existing Area Northwest Quadrant Area Capital Charges (By-law ) $ 7,974 $ - $ 7,974 Village-wide Connection Charges (By-law 9-268) $ 7,727 $ 7,727 Total Connection Charges $ 15,701 $ - $ 15,701 Northwest Quadrant Area - Vacant Area Northwest Quadrant Area Capital Charges (By-law ) $ 7,302 $ - $ 7,302 Village-wide Connection Charges (By-law 9-268) $ 7,727 $ 2,711 $ 10,438 Total Connection Charges $ 15,029 $ 2,711 $ 17,740 Outside of Northwest Quadrant Area Village-wide Connection Charges (By-law 9-268) $ 7,727 $ 2,711 $ 10,438 Page 6-4 Difference vs. Current$ Outside NW Quadrant Proposed Development Charges Village-wide D.C. Development Charge per Single Detached Unit $ 6, $ 2,342 $ 8,492 $ (9,248) $ (1,946) Development Charge per Single Detached Unit (Drainage Area 13) $ 5,858 $ 2,342 $ 8, $ (9,540) n/a Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

40 7. Development Charge Policy Recommendations and Development Charge By-law Rules Page 7-1 This chapter outlines the development charge policy recommendations and by-law rules. The rules provided are based on the Village s existing policies; however, there are items under consideration at this time and these may be refined prior to adoption of the by-law. s.s.5(1)9 states that rules must be developed:...to determine if a development charge is payable in any particular case and to determine the amount of the charge, subject to the limitations set out in subsection 6. Paragraph 10 of subsection 5(1) goes on to state that the rules may provide for exemptions, phasing in and/or indexing of development charges. s.s.5(6) establishes the following restrictions on the rules: the total of all development charges that would be imposed on anticipated development must not exceed the capital costs determined under 5(1) 2-8 for all services involved; if the rules expressly identify a type of development, they must not provide for it to pay development charges that exceed the capital costs that arise from the increase in the need for service for that type of development; however, this requirement does not relate to any particular development; if the rules provide for a type of development to have a lower development charge than is allowed, the rules for determining development charges may not provide for any resulting shortfall to be made up via other development; and with respect to the rules, subsection 6 states that a D.C. by-law must expressly address the matters referred to above re s.s.5(1) para. 9 and 10, as well as how the rules apply to the redevelopment of land. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

41 Page Development Charge By-law Structure It is recommended that: the Village impose a uniform municipal service area development charge calculation for water and wastewater services, with separate development charges for wastewater services within and outside of Drainage Area 13 ; and one municipal development charge by-law be used for all services. The use of area-specific charges and by-laws was considered as part of this process. However, given the location of anticipated development and the increase in needs, it was determined that maintaining the current practice of uniform charges is appropriate. 7.2 Development Charge By-law Rules The following sets out the recommended rules governing the calculation, payment and collection of development charges in accordance with subsection 6 of the Development Charges Act, It is recommended that the following provides the basis for the development charges: Payment in any Particular Case In accordance with the Development Charges Act, 1997, s.2(2), a development charge be calculated, payable and collected where the development requires one or more of the following: a) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning by-law under Section 34 of the Planning Act; b) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; c) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under Section 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; d) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; e) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; f) the approval of a description under Section 50 of the Condominium Act; or Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

42 g) the issuing of a building permit under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure Determination of the Amount of the Charge The following conventions be adopted: Page 7-3 1) Costs allocated to residential uses will be assigned to different types of residential units based on the average occupancy for each housing type constructed during the previous decade. Costs allocated to non-residential uses will be assigned to industrial and commercial/institutional uses based on the gross floor area constructed. 2) Costs allocated to residential and non-residential uses are based upon the conventions summarized in Chapter 5 herein (i.e. increment design flows) Application to Redevelopment of Land (Demolition and Conversion) If a development involves the demolition and replacement of a building or structure on the same site, or the conversion from one principal use to another, the developer shall be allowed a credit equivalent to: 1) the number of dwelling units demolished/converted multiplied by the applicable residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable; and/or 2) the gross floor area of the building demolished/converted multiplied by the current non-residential development charge in place at the time the development charge is payable. The demolition credit is allowed only if the land was improved by occupied structures, and if the demolition permit related to the site was issued less than 60 months (5 years) prior to the issuance of a building permit. The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of development charges that would otherwise be payable Exemptions (full or partial) a) Statutory exemptions Industrial building additions of up to and including 50% of the existing gross floor area (defined in O.Reg. 82/98, s.1) of the building; for industrial building additions which exceed 50% of the existing gross floor area, only Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

43 Page 7-4 the portion of the addition in excess of 50% is subject to development charges (s.4(3)); Buildings or structures owned by and used for the purposes of any Village, local board or Board of Education (s.3); and Residential development that results in only the enlargement of an existing dwelling unit, or that results only in the creation of up to two additional dwelling units (based on prescribed limits set out in s.2 of O.Reg. 82/98). b) Non-statutory exemptions The development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide farm uses; A cemetery and burial ground exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act; and Development creating or adding an accessory use or structure not exceeding 10 square metres of non-residential gross floor area Phase in Provision(s) No provisions for phasing in the development charge are provided in the proposed development charge by-law Timing of Collection The development charges for all services are payable upon issuance of a building permit for each dwelling unit, building or structure, subject to early or late payment agreements entered into by the Village and an owner under s.27 of the D.C.A., Indexing All development charges will be subject to mandatory indexing annually on the anniversary date of the by-law, in accordance with provisions under the Development Charges Act. 7.3 Other Development Charge By-law Provisions Categories of Services for Reserve Fund and Credit Purposes It is recommended that the Village s development charge collections be contributed into two (2) separate reserve funds, including: Water Services and Wastewater Services. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

44 Page By-law In-force Date The proposed by-law under D.C.A., 1997 will come into force on the date of by-law passage Minimum Interest Rate Paid on Refunds and Charged for Inter-Reserve Fund Borrowing The minimum interest rate is the Bank of Canada rate on the day on which the by-law comes into force (as per s.11 of O.Reg. 82/98). 7.4 Other Recommendations It is recommended that Council: Approve the capital project listing set out in Chapter 5 of the 2018 Water and Wastewater Services Development Charges Background Study & Connection Charges Study dated April 20, 2018, subject to further annual review during the capital budget process; Approve the 2018 Water and Wastewater Services Development Charges Background Study & Connection Charges Study dated April 20, 2018;" Determine that no further public meeting is required; and Approve the Development Charge By-law as set out in Appendix C. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

45 Page By-law Implementation 8.1 Public Consultation This chapter addresses the mandatory, formal public consultation process (subsection 8.1.2), as well as the optional, informal consultation process (subsection 8.1.3). The latter is designed to seek the co-operation and involvement of those involved, in order to produce the most suitable policy. Section 8.2 addresses the anticipated impact of the development charge on development, from a generic viewpoint Public Meeting of Council Section 12 of the DCA, 1997 indicates that before passing a development charge bylaw, the background study must be made available on the municipality s website 60- days prior to the passage of the by-law. Also, Council must hold at least one public meeting, giving at least 20 clear days notice thereof, in accordance with the Regulation. Council must also ensure that the proposed by-law and background report are made available to the public at least two weeks prior to the (first) public meeting. Any person who attends such a meeting may make representations related to the proposed by-law. If a proposed by-law is changed following such a meeting, the Council must determine whether a further meeting (under this section) is necessary. For example, if the by-law which is proposed for adoption has been changed in any respect, the Council should formally consider whether an additional public meeting is required, incorporating this determination as part of the final by-law or associated resolution. It is noted that Council s decision, once made, is final and not subject to review by a Court or the O.M.B Other Consultation Activity There are three broad groupings of the public who are generally the most concerned with municipal development charge policy: 1. The residential development community, consisting of land developers and builders, who are typically responsible for generating the majority of the development charge revenues. Others, such as realtors, are directly impacted by development charge policy. They are, therefore, potentially interested in all aspects of the charge, particularly the quantum by unit type, projects to be Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

46 Page 8-2 funded by the D.C. and the timing thereof, and municipal policy with respect to development agreements, D.C. credits and front-ending requirements. 2. The second public grouping embraces the public at large and includes taxpayer coalition groups and others interested in public policy (e.g. in encouraging a higher non-automobile modal split). 3. The third grouping is the industrial/commercial/institutional development sector, consisting of land developers and major owners or organizations with significant construction plans, such as hotels, entertainment complexes, shopping centres, offices, industrial buildings and institutions. Also involved are organizations such as Industry Associations, the Chamber of Commerce, the Board of Trade and the Economic Development Agencies, who are all potentially interested in municipal development charge policy. Their primary concern is frequently with the quantum of the charge, gross floor area exclusions such as basement, mechanical or indoor parking areas, or exemptions and phase-in or capping provisions in order to moderate the impact. 8.2 Anticipated Impact of the Charge on Development The establishment of sound development charge policy often requires the achievement of an acceptable balance between two competing realities. The first is that high nonresidential development charges can, to some degree, represent a barrier to increased economic activity and sustained industrial/commercial growth, particularly for capital intensive uses. Also, in many cases, increased residential development charges can ultimately be expected to be recovered via higher housing prices and can impact project feasibility in some cases (e.g. rental apartments). On the other hand, development charges or other municipal capital funding sources need to be obtained in order to help ensure that the necessary infrastructure and amenities are installed. The timely installation of such works is a key initiative in providing adequate service levels and in facilitating strong economic growth, investment and wealth generation. 8.3 Implementation Requirements Once the Village has calculated the charge, prepared the complete Background Study, carried out the public process and passed a new by-law, the emphasis shifts to implementation matters. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

47 Page 8-3 These include notices, potential appeals and complaints, credits, front-ending agreements, subdivision agreement conditions and finally the collection of revenues and funding of projects. The following provides an overview of the requirements in each case Notice of Passage In accordance with s.13 of the D.C.A., when a D.C. by-law is passed, the municipal clerk shall give written notice of the passing and of the last day for appealing the by-law (the day that is 40 days after the day it was passed). Such notice must be given not later than 20 days after the day the by-law is passed (i.e. as of the day of newspaper publication or the mailing of the notice). Section 10 of O.Reg. 82/98 further defines the notice requirements which are summarized as follows: Notice may be given by publication in a newspaper which is (in the Clerk s opinion) of sufficient circulation to give the public reasonable notice, or by personal service, fax or mail to every owner of land in the area to which the bylaw relates; s.s.10 (4) lists the persons/organizations who must be given notice; and s.s.10 (5) lists the eight items which the notice must cover By-law Pamphlet In addition to the notice information, the Village must prepare a pamphlet explaining each development charge by-law in force, setting out: a description of the general purpose of the development charges; the rules for determining if a charge is payable in a particular case and for determining the amount of the charge; the services to which the development charges relate; and a general description of the general purpose of the Treasurer s statement and where it may be received by the public. Where a by-law is not appealed to the O.M.B., the pamphlet must be readied within 60 days after the by-law comes into force. Later dates apply to appealed by-laws. The Village must give one copy of the most recent pamphlet without charge, to any person who requests one. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

48 Page Appeals Sections 13 to 19 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out requirements relative to making and processing a D.C. by-law appeal and an O.M.B. Hearing in response to an appeal. Any person or organization may appeal a D.C. by-law to the O.M.B. by filing a notice of appeal with the municipal clerk, setting out the objection to the by-law and the reasons supporting the objection. This must be done by the last day for appealing the by-law, which is 40 days after the by-law is passed Complaints A person required to pay a development charge, or his agent, may complain to Municipal Council imposing the charge that: the amount of the charge was incorrectly determined; the credit to be used against the development charge was incorrectly determined; or there was an error in the application of the development charge. Sections 20 to 25 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out the requirements that exist, including the fact that a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after a D.C. (or any part of it) is payable. A complainant may appeal the decision of Municipal Council to the O.M.B Credits Sections 38 to 41 of the D.C.A., 1997 set out a number of credit requirements, which apply where a Village agrees to allow a person to perform work in the future that relates to a service in the D.C. by-law. These credits would be used to reduce the amount of development charges to be paid. The value of the credit is limited to the reasonable cost of the work which does not exceed the average level of service. The credit applies only to the service to which the work relates, unless the Village agrees to expand the credit to other services for which a development charge is payable Front-Ending Agreements The Village and one or more landowners may enter into a front-ending agreement which provides for the costs of a project which will benefit an area in the Village to which the D.C. by-law applies. Such an agreement can provide for the costs to be borne by one Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

49 Page 8-5 or more parties to the agreement who are, in turn, reimbursed in future by persons who develop land defined in the agreement. Part III of the D.C.A., 1997 (Sections 44 to 58) addresses front-ending agreements and removes some of the obstacles to their use which were contained in the D.C.A., Accordingly, the Village assesses whether this mechanism is appropriate for its use, as part of funding projects prior to municipal funds being available Severance and Subdivision Agreement Conditions Section 59 of the D.C.A., 1997 prevents a Village from imposing directly or indirectly, a charge related to development or a requirement to construct a service related to development, by way of a condition or agreement under s.51 or s.53 of the Planning Act, except for: local services, related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates, to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 51 of the Planning Act; local services to be installed or paid for by the owner as a condition of approval under Section 53 of the Planning Act. It is also noted that s.s.59(4) of the D.C.A., 1997 requires that the municipal approval authority for a draft plan of subdivision under s.s.51(31) of the Planning Act, use its power to impose conditions to ensure that the first purchaser of newly subdivided land is informed of all the development charges related to the development, at the time the land is transferred. In this regard, if the municipality in question is a commenting agency, in order to comply with subsection 59(4) of the Development Charges Act, 1997 it would need to provide to the approval authority, information regarding the applicable municipal development charges related to the site. If the municipality is an approval authority for the purposes of Section 51 of the Planning Act, it would be responsible to ensure that it collects information from all entities which can impose a development charge. The most effective way to ensure that purchasers are aware of this condition would be to require it as a provision in a registered subdivision agreement, so that any purchaser of the property would be aware of the charges at the time the title was searched prior to closing a transaction conveying the lands. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

50 Page Connection Charges Calculation 9.1 Introduction Chapter 2 of this background study, summarizes the Village s current connection charge and capital charge policies. The current connection charges for water and sanitary sewage services are contained in By-law No Moreover, By-law No was passed by Council to recover the area-specific costs relating to the extension of sanitary sewer services to the area north west of the Nation River (i.e. the Northwest Quadrant Area). These by-laws were passed under the authority of s.391 of the Municipal Act, which is the section of the Act respecting the fees and charges. This chapter of the background study outlines the rationale and recommendations for the Village s connection charges policies for: water and wastewater services, which would be applicable to existing occupied units converting from private services and connecting into municipal water and wastewater services; and area-specific connection charges for wastewater local services installed within the Northwest Quadrant Area, benefitting existing occupied units and future developments in Drainage Area Municipal Act Fees and Charges The Municipal Act, 1, came into force January 1, 3. Part XII Fees and Charges, gives municipalities the statutory authority to recover the costs of services, including capital costs, through by-law. Municipalities have used these types of charges to recover infrastructure costs associated with the extension of municipal services to private service users, to recover capital improvement costs from existing developments, and to recover growth-related costs of service extension. These by-laws are typically used where development charges would not be applicable (e.g. recovery from existing developments) or where existing and growth-related cost recovery would be simplified under the administration of one by-law. The following subsections provide reference to the relevant statutory provisions of the Municipal Act and associated regulation. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

51 Page Municipal Act Part XII By-laws re: fees and charges Local board 391. (1) Without limiting sections 9, 10 and 11, those sections authorize a municipality to impose fees or charges on persons, (a) for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it; (b) for costs payable by it for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of any other municipality or any local board; and (c) for the use of its property including property under its control. (1.1) A local board may impose fees or charges on persons, (a) for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it; (b) for costs payable by it for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of any municipality or other local board; and (c) for the use of its property including property under its control. Deferred benefit (2) A fee or charge imposed for capital costs related to services or activities may be imposed on persons not receiving an immediate benefit from the services or activities but who will receive a benefit at some later point in time. Costs related to administration, etc. (3) The costs included in a fee or charge may include costs incurred by the municipality or local board related to administration, enforcement and the establishment, acquisition and replacement of capital assets. The above referenced sections of the Municipal Act indicate that it is permissible for municipalities to impose charges for the recovery of capital costs associated with services that are provided either directly or on its behalf. These capital costs can include costs associated with the initial establishment or acquisition of capital or for the replacement of existing capital assets. Moreover, the Act permits the imposition of capital charges on persons who receive an immediate benefit or a benefit at some later point (i.e. deferred benefit). Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

52 Page 9-3 Section 391 of the Municipal Act does not define a methodology for calculating the fee or charge quantum, nor for determining its distribution among the benefiting landowners. As such, fees and charges may be determined at the reasonable discretion of Council following some general restrictions. Restriction, poll tax 393. No fee or charge by-law shall impose a poll tax or similar fee or charge, including a fee or charge which is imposed on an individual by reason only of his or her presence or residence in the municipality or part of it. Restriction, fees and charges 394. (1) No fee or charge by-law shall impose a fee or charge that is based on, is in respect of or is computed by reference to, (a) the income of a person, however it is earned or received, except that a municipality or local board may exempt, in whole or in part, any class of persons from all or part of a fee or charge on the basis of inability to pay; (b) the use, purchase or consumption by a person of property other than property belonging to or under the control of the municipality or local board that passes the by-law; (c) the use, consumption or purchase by a person of a service other than a service provided or performed by or on behalf of or paid for by the municipality or local board that passes the by-law; (d) the benefit received by a person from a service other than a service provided or performed by or on behalf of or paid for by the municipality or local board that passes the by-law; or (e) the generation, exploitation, extraction, harvesting, processing, renewal or transportation of natural resources. There are no public process requirements under Part XII for adopting a charge by-law (although it is a prudent process recommendation). Part XII charges cannot be appealed to the O.M.B. on the grounds that the fees or charges are unfair or unjust. However they may be challenged in court on the basis that the municipality is not operating within its statutory authority Ontario Regulation 584/06 Ontario Regulation 584/06 governs the fees and charges provision of the Municipal Act. The fees and charges regulation was revised in 6 by the Municipal Statute Law Amendment Act. The regulation in its present form is less prescriptive than its predecessor. The previous regulation (i.e. O.Reg. 244/02) limited by-laws for water and Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

53 Page 9-4 waste services to a 1-year period, required public process notification and meetings to substantiate any charges and expressly limited any charges to the costs of service. Furthermore, the previous restrictions whereby a municipality did not have the power to impose fees or charges under Part XII of the Act relating to the allocation of sewage and water capacity have been removed. These changes to the fees and charges regulation provide municipalities with greater flexibility in determining its use. It should be noted that in applying Section 391 of the Municipal Act for the recovery of capital costs a municipality must have regard for the associated regulation. Section 2(1) of the regulation indicates that a fee under the Act cannot be imposed to recover capital costs that are also included in a development charge or front-ending agreement which is in effect before the imposition of the fee. This clause is provided to avoid a duplication of fees and charges for the same works. As these costs are not included in the City s D.C. By-laws and, based on our review, payments have not been made towards these costs under prior D.C. By-laws, no duplication in cost recovery exists. Capital costs 2. (1) A municipality and a local board do not have power under the Act to impose fees or charges to obtain revenue to pay capital costs, if as a result of development charges by-laws or front-ending agreements under the Development Charges Act, 1997 or a predecessor of that Act that was passed or entered into before the imposition of the fees or charges, payments have been, will be or could be made to the municipality or local board to pay those costs Ontario Regulation 581/06 Ontario Regulation 581/06 provides priority lien status for fees and charges imposed for certain services. Under this regulation, fees and charges imposed for the use of a sewage system may be added to the tax roll, as a debt to the municipality, and will have priority lien status. These powers allow the treasurer of the municipality to add fees and charges to the tax roll and collect them in the same manner as taxes. Priority lien status provides for the recovery of interest costs associated with the debt from the assessed owner at the time of the fee or charge being imposed or from a subsequent property owner, and may be included in the cancellation price. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

54 Page 9-5 Certain public utility fees and charges 1. Fees and charges that are imposed by a municipality or local board under the Act for the following services and added to the tax roll under subsection 398(2) of the Act have priority lien status as described in section 1 of the Act: 1. For the supply of water. 2. For the supply of artificial or natural gas. 3. For the supply of steam or hot water. 4. For the use of a sewage system. 5. For the use of a waste management system. 9.3 Connection Charge Calculations This chapter outlines the basis for calculating connection charges for water and wastewater services to be applied for conversions of existing occupied existing occupied units converting from private services and connecting into municipal water and wastewater services, as well as additional area-specific connection charges for wastewater local services installed in Drainage Area 14. Morrison Hershfield Limited was commissioned to analyze the capacity of the existing communal water and sanitary systems for current and projected flows, and to develop a program of growth-related water and sewer capital project needs to The capital costs are contained in the Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited, and is provided in detail in Appendix B Water and Wastewater Services Connection Charges The Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited, identifies the additional water and wastewater capital needs required to service new customers to the municipal services. As noted in Chapter 3, the assessment includes the demands of new development of vacant lands, as well as anticipated private service conversions from existing occupied units. Consistent with the determination of capital needs, the calculation of the development charges have been undertaken to include these private service conversions. This has been done to identify the average costs of service for these private service conversions and to provide equity in the treatment of charges being imposed on new customers to the service, whether as a result of new development or service conversion. In, this regard, the charges provided in Table 6-4 would be equally applicable to private service conversions of existing occupied units within the municipally serviced area. Table 9-1 summarizes the calculated connection charges for this purpose. It is anticipated that the Village will be amending By-law No in include these connection charges. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

55 Page 9-6 Table 9-1 Schedule of Connection Charges Water and Wastewater Services Single and Semi- Detached Dwellings Residential Non-Residential Apartments - 2 Apartments - Bedrooms and Bachelor and 1 Larger Bedroom Other Multiples Per sq.mt. of GFA Service Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $5,858 $2,851 $2,627 $4,411 $18.90 Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $6, $2,993 $2,758 $4,631 $19.82 Water Services $2,342 $1,140 $1,050 $1,763 $6.88 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $8, $3,991 $3,677 $6,174 $25.77 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $8,492 $4,133 $3,808 $6,394 $ Area-Specific Wastewater Services Connection Charge for Drainage Area 14 As noted in Chapter 5, with respect to wastewater services, approximately $3.3 million in capital costs have been deducted as a local service. These costs reflect the local sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller, and pump stations servicing sanitary sewers of 250mm diameter and smaller, that are required to be installed directly by developers as a condition of development agreements. Included in this amount is project CC2b, for sanitary sewers installed on Sarah, Filion, Martin, Maria, Francess Streets to service the existing private service conversions, as well as other vacant properties fronting the works, in Drainage Area 14. The cost for these sewers totals approximately $1.7 million. Equity in treatment between new vacant land development and private services conversions would suggest that these costs should be recovered from the benefitting properties through and area-specific connection charge. As such, the following summarizes the calculations for the area-specific wastewater connection charge in Drainage Area 14. Map 9-1 illustrates the Villages municipal wastewater service area by drainage area. The area identified for the area-specific wastewater connection charge is Drainage Area 14. In addition to this map, Table 9-3 also provides the individual properties for which the area-specific charge would be imposed. Based on the information provided by the Village, there are currently 111 occupied residential dwelling units that would be connected to the municipal wastewater system, benefitting from these local services. In addition, there are is estimated 3,682 square metres of existing non-residential gross floor area occupied in the defined area that would also connect to these system and benefit from these works. In addition to these existing occupied units, there are 20 vacant properties that when constructed will be connected to this system and will derive a benefit from these capital works. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

56 Page 9-7 Map 9-1 Village of Casselman Municipal Wastewater Service Area by Drainage Area Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

57 Page 9-8 On this basis, Table 9-2 summarizes the calculation of the area-specific wastewater connection charge for Drainage Area 14. For calculation purposes, the gross capital costs total approximately $1.7 million, secured grant funding toward this project of $1.2 million has been deducted, resulting in a total amount for recover from the connection charge of $450,876. These net capital costs have been apportioned between the benefitting residential and non-residential properties based on the underlying design flow assumptions used in the Morrison Hershfield Limited study. As a result, $420,599 would be recovered from the residential properties and $30,276 from the non-residential properties. These calculations result in a connection charge of $3,211 per single detached residential unit and $8.22 per square metre of non-residential gross floor area. It is anticipated that these charges would be imposed through a separate area-specific wastewater connection charge bylaw, and that these charges would be in addition to those identified above in Table 9-1 (as per the amended By-law No ). For greater clarity, Table 9-3 identifies each of the benefitting properties to the area-specific wastewater connection charge and the amount of both the area-specific wastewater connection charge and the wastewater connection charge under amended By-law No Connection Charge By-law Policy Recommendations The following recommendations are provided for Council s consideration. It is recommended that the capital costs associated with water and wastewater service benefits received by private service conversions in the municipal service area be recovered through a connection charge. That the connection charge be imposed by bylaw passed under the authority of Section 391 of the Municipal Act. That these connection charges be imposed by amendment to By-law No It is further recommended that capital costs associated with the wastewater service benefits received from the construction of sanitary sewers installed on Sarah, Filion, Martin, Maria, Francess Streets to service the existing private service conversions, as well as other vacant properties fronting the works, in Drainage Area 14 be recovered through an area-specific connection charge. That the area-specific wastewater connection charge be imposed by by-law passed under the authority of Section 391 of the Municipal Act. That these connection charges be imposed by the passage of a new by-law. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

58 Page 9-9 Moreover, with respect to the area-specific wastewater connection charge for Drainage Area 14, it is recommended that four (4) payment options be provided to benefiting properties, including:. 1. Commuted Charge At the time of connection to the municipal wastewater system, the landowner would pay the total area-specific wastewater connection charge and wastewater connection charge under amended By-Law No (e.g. $9,361 per single detached residential unit) Year Instalment Charge At the time of connection to the municipal wastewater system, the landowner would apply to pay the total area-specific wastewater connection charge and wastewater connection charge under amended By-Law No , including interest at 4.14% annually, on an annual installment basis over 5 years (e.g. $2,111 per single detached residential unit) Year Instalment Charge At the time of connection to the municipal wastewater system, the landowner would apply to pay the total area-specific wastewater connection charge and wastewater connection charge under amended By-Law No , including interest at 4.14% annually, on an annual installment basis over 10 years (e.g. $1,162 per single detached residential unit) Year Instalment Charge At the time of connection to the municipal wastewater system, the landowner would apply to pay the total area-specific wastewater connection charge and wastewater connection charge under amended By-Law No , including interest at 4.14% annually, on an annual installment basis over 15 years (e.g. $850 per single detached residential unit). Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

59 Page 9-10 Table 9-2 Area- Specific Wastewater Connection Charges Calculation for Drainage Area 14 Project No. Name Description Diameter (mm) Year Gross Capital Cost Local Service Post Period Benefit Benefit to Subsidies Existing and Other Development Contributions Grants Connection Charge Recoverable Cost Connection Charge Recoverable Residential Cost Share Connection Charge Recoverable Non- Residential Cost Share CC2b Sanitary Sewer Sarah, Filion, Martin, Maria, Francess Streets 2017 $ 1,691,430 $ 1,691,430 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,240,554 $ 450,876 $ 420,599 $ 30,276 Incremental /GFA 369 3,682 Connection Charge per SDU 3, H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background Study.docx

60 Page 9-11 Table 9-3 Summary of Area-Specific Wastewater Connection Charge and Wastewater Connection Charge under amended By-law No by Property in Drainage Area 14, including Annual Installment Options Area- Wastewater Total Annual Annual Annual Specific Connection Connection Insalment Insalment Insalment Wastewater Charge Charges after after after Street Connection (By-law at Time of Connection Connection Connection Roll # Owner Address Charge 9-268) Connection (5 year) (10 year) (15 year) Rue Principale Street Marc Brisson 821 $ 3,211 Pay DC $ 3,211 n/a n/a n/a Marc Brisson 823 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marietta Brisson 825 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Ghysline Bourque 827 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Bertrand Lafleche 829 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Royal Racine 831 vacant $ 3,211 Pay DC $ 3,211 n/a n/a n/a 39 Stephen Sloan / Sylvie Joanisse 839 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Estelle Lafleche 841 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Isabelle Racine 843 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Denis Racine 845 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Sylvain Durocher 847 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Mathiew Evraire 849 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Paul Bertrand 853 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Robert Labelle 857 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Florent Lacroix 861 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Michelle Jardine 863 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Yves Chartrand 865 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Steve Encarnacao 869 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marc Demers $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Jacques Racine 824 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Florian Racine 828 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Jacques Racine 832 vacant $ 9,632 Pay DC $ 9,632 n/a n/a n/a Leo Pilon 836 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Francois Paquet / Carolyn Michelle Cooper 838 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jason Gauthier 840 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Michel Bergevin 842 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Michel Leroux 844 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Guillaume Racine 846 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Daniel Lafleur 848 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marcel Laforest 850 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Marc Racine 852 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Christopher Martin 856 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Gisele Surprenant 858 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Rue Principale Street Julie Guindon-Gilders 860 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Donat Bourdeau 862 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Richard Hughes 866 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Robert Larocque 877 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Roger Bourgeois 879 vacant $ 3,211 Pay DC $ 3,211 n/a n/a n/a Denise Robinson 881 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Rue Francess Carole Brisson 854 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jean-Francois Lalonde / Jessie Hull 856 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Stephan Hince / Sylvie Hince 858 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Georgette Levesque 860 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Riviere Nation Nord Francois Feidmuller 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Madeleine Deguire 14 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Gilles Racine 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Patrick Bergeron / Jenne Lavoie 20 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jacques Boulerice 22 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

61 Page 9-12 Table 9-3 (cont d) Summary of Area-Specific Wastewater Connection Charge and Wastewater Connection Charge under amended By-law No by Property in Drainage Area 14, including Annual Installment Options Area- Wastewater Total Annual Annual Annual Specific Connection Connection Insalment Insalment Insalment Wastewater Charge Charges after after after Street Connection (By-law at Time of Connection Connection Connection Roll # Owner Address Charge 9-268) Connection (5 year) (10 year) (15 year) Rue Maria Street Celine Bertrand 9 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jimmy Paquette 11 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Stephen O'Connor 13 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Alcide Cote 15 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Donald Fournier 17 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Benjamin Townsend 19 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Denise Robinson 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Kris Robinson 14 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marcel Durocher 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Rue Mercier Street Jean Lamadeleine 13 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Masuduzzcha Sarwar 15 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Etienne Piche 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Richard Jobin 14 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Serge Lamadeleine 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Luc Dignard / Antic Samson 18 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Gabriel Gagne 20 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Stephen Downes 22 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Isabelle Charbonneau 24 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Rue Martin Street Loise Boucher 1 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Gilles Cleroux 3 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 'cannel Plum 5 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Andre Cleroux 7 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Andre Gaudreau 9 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Martial Collard 11 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Robert Gervais 13 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Louis Godard 15 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Pierre Desnoyers 4 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Joel Martin 8 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marc Lebrun 10 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Daniel Pilon 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Amelie Beland 14 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Daniel Chaput 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ James O'Rourke 18 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Rue Sarah Street Carl Dignard 2A $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Ghislain Bourdeau 2B $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Francis Lapointe 4 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Diane Charlebois 6 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Anthony Wollinger 8 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Henri Morin 10 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Patick Summers 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Merrilee Wilson 14 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jacques Lacelle 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Serge Poirier 18 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jason Patronage 20 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Guy Brisson 22 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Ronald Lamoureux 24 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Guy Bourbonnais 26 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Bourgeas (NEW) $ 41,739 Pay DC $ 41,739 n/a n/a n/a Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

62 Page 9-13 Table 9-3 (cont d) Summary of Area-Specific Wastewater Connection Charge and Wastewater Connection Charge under amended By-law No by Property in Drainage Area 14, including Annual Installment Options Area- Wastewater Total Annual Annual Annual Specific Connection Connection Insalment Insalment Insalment Wastewater Charge Charges after after after Street Connection (By-law at Time of Connection Connection Connection Roll # Owner Address Charge 9-268) Connection (5 year) (10 year) (15 year) Rue Fillion Street James Cameron / Daniel Cameron Pare 5 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Francois Lafleur / Nancy Lafleur 9 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Dominic Belanger / Kathleen Therrin 13 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Marie-Josee Gagnon 17 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Rejeanne Lefebvre 21 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Philippe Benoit / Soma Paiva 25 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Danny Beaulieu / France &met 29 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Michel Garin / Julie Charland 33 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Frederic Ladouceur / Sonia Beaudry 37 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Pierre Marco= / Monique Marco= 41 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Bernard Adam / Denise Adam 4 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Rene Labelle / Monique Labelle 8 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Regent Villeneuve / Jocelyn Villeneuve 12 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Gaston Michaud / Pauline Michaud 16 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Jonathan Clement 20 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Christopher Lee / James Ring 22 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Michel Faubert / Lyne Faubert. 28 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Nancy Godbout 30 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Richard Konaskie 36 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ Diane Brisson Adam 40 $ 3,211 $ 6, $ 9,361 $ 2,111 $ 1,162 $ 850 Roger Bourgeois $ 3,211 Pay DC $ 3,211 n/a n/a n/a Rue Principale Street 'Ontario Inc 817 $ 24,367 $ 58,741 $ 83,108 $ 18,742 $ 10,318 $ 7, Casselman Village ( Entrepot ) 868 $ 4,431 $ 10,680 $ 15,111 $ 3,408 $ 1,876 $ 1, Eastern Ontario Unit 872 $ 1,478 $ 3,560 $ 5,038 $ 1,136 $ 625 $ 458 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

63 Page A-1 Appendix A Background Information on Residential and Non-residential Growth Forecast Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

64 Schedule 1 Village of Casselman Residential Growth Forecast Summary Historical Forecast Incremental Year Including Census Undercount 1 Excluding Census Undercount Institutional Excluding Institutional Singles & Semi- Detached Housing Units Multiple Dwellings 2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Mid 1 3,010 2, , , Mid 6 3,410 3, , , Mid ,750 3, ,500 1, , Mid ,670 3, ,440 1, , Early ,680 3, ,451 1, , Early ,410 4, ,130 1, , Mid , 5, ,875 1, , Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid ,520 1, , Source:, Census Undercount estimated at approximately 3.5%. Note: Including the Undercount has been rounded. 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Person Per Unit (PPU) Figure A-1 Annual Housing Forecast¹ Housing Units Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity (7-2017) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB 2018 housing growth derived by Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

65 Schedule 2 Village of Casselman Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Single & Semi- Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Residential Gross in Units New Units Existing Unit Change Net Increase Institutional Net Including Institutional Northwest Quadrant Outside of Northwest Quadrant Village of Casselman (82) (100) (88) (110) (169) ,634 (209) 1, ,469 Source:, Residential distribution based on a combination of historical permit activity, available housing supply and discussions with Village staff regarding future development prospects. 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

66 Schedule 3 Village of Casselman Current Year Growth Forecast Mid 2016 to Early 2018 Mid ,548 Occupants of Units (2) 22 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) Mid 2016 to Early 2018 gross population increase Occupants of New Units (3) 0 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit Mid 2016 to Early 2018 gross population increase 0 0 Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,425 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Mid 2016 to Early 2018 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,559 Net Increase, Mid 2016 to Early (1) 2016 population based on Statistics Canada Census unadjusted for Census Undercount. (2) Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2016 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six month lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % Multiples (6) % Apartments (7) % Total 100% ¹ Based on 2016 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4) 2016 households taken from Statistics Canada Census. (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

67 Schedule 4 Village of Casselman Ten Year Growth Forecast Early 2018 to Early 2028 Early ,559 Occupants of Units (2) 359 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) Early 2018 to Early 2028 gross population increase Occupants of New Units (3) 19 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit Early 2018 to Early 2028 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,447 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Early 2018 to Early 2028 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,260 Net Increase, Early 2018 to Early (1) Early 2018 based on: 2016 (3,548) + Mid 2016 to Early 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (22 x 2.02 = 44) + (1,425 x = -33) = 3,559 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % Multiples (6) % Apartments (7) % one bedroom or less two bedrooms or more Total 100% ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2018 households based upon 1,425 (2016 Census) + 22 (Mid 2016 to Early 2018 unit estimate) = 1,447 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

68 Schedule 5 Village of Casselman Early 2018 to Mid 2036 Early ,559 Occupants of Units (2) 704 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) Early 2018 to Mid 2036 gross population increase 1,634 1,634 Occupants of New Units (3) 41 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit Early 2018 to Mid 2036 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,447 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu. decline rate (5) Early 2018 to Mid 2036 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,028 Net Increase, Early 2018 to Mid ,469 (1) Early 2018 based on: 2016 (3,548) + Mid 2016 to Early 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (22 x 2.02 = 44) + (1,425 x = -33) = 3,559 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % Multiples (6) % Apartments (7) % one bedroom or less two bedrooms or more Total 100% ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2018 households based upon 1,425 (2016 Census) + 22 (Mid 2016 to Early 2018 unit estimate) = 1,447 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

69 Schedule 6a Village of Casselman Summary of Units in the Development Process Stage of Development Singles & Semi- Detached Density Type Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Draft Plans Approved ,220 % Breakdown 55% 10% 35% 100% Active Applications/ Other % Breakdown 78% 0% 22% 100% Total 1, ,773 % Breakdown 62% 7% 31% 100% Source: Derived from the Village of Cassleman Planning Services, November 2017 data 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Schedule 6b Village of Casselman Northwest Quadrant Summary of Units in the Development Process Stage of Development Singles & Semi- Detached Density Type Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown 40% 5% 6% 100% Active Applications/ Other % Breakdown 26% 7% 8% 100% Total % Breakdown 74% 12% 14% 100% Source: Derived from the Village of Cassleman Planning Services, November 2017 data 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

70 Schedule 6c Village of Casselman Outside of Northwest Quadrant Summary of Units in the Development Process Stage of Development Singles & Semi- Detached Density Type Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Draft Plans Approved % Breakdown 15% 5% 28% 100% Active Applications/ Other % Breakdown 59% 0% 0% 100% Total % Breakdown 56% 7% 38% 100% Source: Derived from the Village of Cassleman Planning Services, November 2017 data 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

71 Schedule 7 Village of Casselman Historical Residential Building Permits Years Residential Building Permits Year Singles & Semi Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Sub-total Average (7-2011) % Breakdown 62.6% 5.2% 32.3% 100.0% Sub-total Average ( ) % Breakdown 58.8% 11.8% 29.4% 100.0% Total Average % Breakdown 61.9% 6.3% 31.7% 100.0% Source: Historical housing activity (7-2015) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB is based on building permit data from Casselman Village. S1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. B2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

72 Schedule 8 United Counties of Presscott and Russell Persons Per Unit By Age And Type Of Dwelling (2016 Census) Age of Singles and Semi-Detached Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 20 Year Average Total Age of Multiples 2 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 20 Year Average Total Age of Apartments 3 Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Adjusted PPU¹ 20 Year Average Total Age of All Density Types Dwelling < 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3/4 BR 5+ BR Total Total The Census PPU has been adjusted to account for the downward PPU trend which has been recently experienced in both new and older units, largely due to the aging of the population 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Note: Does not include Statistics Canada data classified as 'Other' PPU Not calculated for samples less than or equal to 50 dwelling units, and does not include institutional population H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

73 Schedule 9 United Counties of Presscott and Russell Persons Per Unit By Structural Type And Age Of Dwelling (2016 Census) 3.50 Persons Per Dwelling Age of Dwelling Singles and Semi-Detached Multiples Apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

74 Schedule 10a Village of Casselman Employment Forecast, 2018 to 2036 Activity Rate Employment Period Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Mid 1 2, ,550 Mid 6 3, ,690 Mid , ,051 Mid , ,725 Early , ,739 Early , , ,255 Mid , , ,450 Incremental Change Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid , Annual Average Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid Source:, H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

75 Period Primary Schedule 10b Village of Casselman Employment and Gross Floor Area (G.F.A.) Forecast, 2018 to 2036 Industrial Employment Commercial/ Related Institutional Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹ Mid 1 2, , , , ,500 1,050,500 Mid 6 3, , , , ,000 1,140,300 Mid , , , , ,000 1,402, Mid , , , , ,500 1,204,800 Early , , , , ,500 1,212,500 Early , , , , , ,600 1,581, Mid , , , , , ,000 1,708,600 Incremental Change Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early , ,700 Early Early , ,600 75, ,700 Early Mid , , ,600 98, ,100 Total Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Annual Average Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early , ,133 Early Early ,000 12,360 7,510 36,870 Early Mid ,973 10,519 5,324 26,816 Source:, Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Industrial 1,100 Commercial/ Related 550 Institutional H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

76 Schedule 10c Village of Casselman Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non-Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Industrial G.F.A. S.F. Commercial G.F.A. S.F. Institutional G.F.A. S.F. Total Non-Res G.F.A. S.F. Employment Increase 1 Northwest Quadrant Outside of Northwest Quadrant Village of Casselman Source:, Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. 2. Square feet per employee assumptions: Industrial 1,100 Commercial 550 Institututional ,450-10, ,600 11,550 4,500 22, , , 75, , , ,050 94, , , ,600 75, , , ,600 98, , H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

77 Schedule 11 Village of Casselman Non-Residential Construction Value Years (000's 2017 $) YEAR Industrial Commercial Institutional Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total New Improve Additions Total ,129 2, , ,237 2, , , ,973 2, ,567 4, ,573 1, , ,578 1, , , , , , , ,063 54,063 29, ,295 17,924 6, ,189 80,148 37, , ,494 1, , ,668 1, , , , , , ,143 2, ,143 2, Subotal 8, ,973 65,087 37,835 4, ,250 18,032 9,106 2,973 30,110 91,750 47,875 7, ,334 Percent of Total 87% 9% 4% 100% 61% 35% 4% 100% 60% 30% 10% 100% 62% 32% 5% 100% Average ,509 3, ,725 1, ,011 9,175 4, , Period Total 9,796 98,437 29, , Average 1,959 19,687 5,987 27,634 % Breakdown 7.1% 71.2% 21.7% 100.0% Period Total 177 8, , Average 35 1, ,833 % Breakdown 1.9% 96.2% 1.9% 100.0% Period Total 9, ,250 30, , Average ,725 3,011 14,733 % Breakdown 6.8% 72.8% 20.4% 100.0% Source: Statistics Canada Publication, XIB Note: Inflated to year-end 2017 (January, 2018) dollars using Reed Construction Cost Index H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

78 NAICS Schedule 12 Village of Casselman Employment to Ratio by Major Employment Sector, 1 to 2016 Year Change Comments Employment by industry Primary Industry Employment 11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting Mining and oil and gas extraction Sub-total Industrial and Other Employment 22 Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade Transportation and warehousing Waste management and remediation services Sub-total Categories which relate to local land-based resources. Categories which relate primarily to industrial land supply and demand. Related Employment Retail trade Information and cultural industries Finance and insurance Real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific and technical services Management of companies and enterprises Administrative and support Arts, entertainment and recreation Accommodation and food services Other services (except public administration) Sub-total , Categories which relate primarily to population growth within the municipality. Institutional 61 Educational services Health care and social assistance Public administration Sub-total Total Employment 1,550 1,690 2,051 1, ,910 3,294 3,626 3, Employment to Ratio Industrial and Other Employment Related Employment Institutional Employment Primary Industry Employment Total Source: Statistics Canada Employment by Place of Work Note: employment figures are classified by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

79 Page B-1 Appendix B Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study prepared by Morrison Hershfield Limited Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

80 MEMORANDUM TO: Linda Desjardins-Bergeron, Alain Castonguay FROM: James Fookes, P.Eng. RE: Water and Sewer System Growth-Related Needs Study Village of Casselman O:\OTTAWA\PROJ\2432\ WATER&SEWER RATE STUDY\CASSELMAN WATER SEWER NEEDS DOCX 1. Introduction PROJECT No.: DATE: April 12, 2018 FINAL The Village of Casselman (Village) is undertaking an update of water and sanitary sewer Development Charges (DC) and Connection Charges bylaws. In support of this exercise, Morrison Hershfield Limited (MH) was commissioned to analyze the capacity of the existing communal water and sanitary systems for current and projected flows, and to develop a program of growth-related water and sewer capital project needs to Basis of Study 2.1 Study Area The study covers the area of servicing and anticipated growth within the Village of Casselman municipal boundary. Figures 1 and 2 show the extent of existing water and wastewater servicing. 2.2 Study Horizon For consistency with the Village s current DC forecast, the study addresses growth for the period from 2018 to Ultimate populations and water/sanitary flows are also assessed to establish the required capacity for infrastructure upgrades. 2.3 Growth Projections Watson Associates (Watson) provided historical, forecast population, and employment numbers (Appendix A), illustrated by Chart 1. MH carried out further analysis of these numbers and made assumptions as follows: Inter-censal year populations for historical data (7 to 2018) were estimated by Watson. Watson provided forecasts for 2028 and Values for intermediate years were estimated by MH by interpolation. Watson provided a breakdown of population and employment growth between the Northwest Quadrant (i.e. all lands west of the South Nation River) and the remainder of the Village. MH estimated the current population and employment split to facilitate calculation of future total population and employment on each side of the river. For analysis of the sanitary system, MH divided the Village into 16 drainage areas (catchments) as shown in Figure 3. MH distributed population and employment within each of the drainage areas based on existing land use and anticipated development (as established through

81 - 2 - discussion with Village staff). The specific assumptions made in this process are documented in Appendix B. In summary, it was assumed that development will primarily occur in the northern part of the Village, including the Domaine De La Rivière Nation and Nation View Village subdivisions. Limited growth south of the Highway 417 was assumed towards the end of the study period. Table 1 summarizes the population and non-residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) forecasts used in the study. Further details are provided in Appendix B. Table 1 Summary of and Non-Residential GFA forecasts Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Northwest Quadrant 302 4, ,371 1,012 6,503 East of River 3, ,600 3, ,883 3, ,585 Total 3, ,000 4, ,253 4, ,088 Chart 1 Historical and Forecast and Non-Residential Gross Floor Area

82 Scope of Water and Sanitary System Assessments The study considers the components of the water and sanitary systems most likely to be affected by population growth and development: Water Treatment Plant Water Storage (Elevated Tank) Trunk watermains 1 Sewage Treatment Lagoons Sewage Lift Stations and Pump Stations Trunk sewers (main sewer run from south of Highway 417 to Pump Station 1, and main sewer run from northwest extent of Village to Pump Station 6). The capacity of these components will be assessed through the study period. Where utilization of linear infrastructure or pumping stations exceed 80% of capacity, upgrades will be proposed. This approach ensures that sufficient time is available to design and construct upgrades, and maintains a margin of reserve capacity at all times. Upgrades will typically be sized for ultimate flows, unless a smaller upgrade appears warranted (e.g. where a very large increase in capacity will ultimately be required). Since the total demand from/flow to treatment plants can be forecast more accurately than flows in individual pipes, upgrades will be scheduled on a case-by-case basis with consideration of the forecast rate of flow increase. Within the capital program, upgrade design expenditures will be scheduled in the year in which the need for upgrade is identified. Construction expenditures will be scheduled in the following year. 2.5 Water Design Basis A water balance exercise was carried out to determine historical per-capita water consumption rates in the Village. Water consumption data (billing data) from 2010 to 2016 was compared to total recorded treatment plant output and historical population data. For the purposes of this study, all water consumption was classified as either Residential or Non- Residential. The Residential water consumption classification covers all water consumption in private residences with individual water meters (assumed to include all single-family homes, townhomes and apartments). The Non-Residential classification applies to all other metered water use, including commercial, institutional and industrial use. Since institutional water use falls under the non-residential classification, the institutional population is subtracted from all populations considered in this study. Residential institutional water use is instead calculated on a per GFA m² basis, alongside commercial, industrial and other institutional use. Chart 2 illustrates historical water production, categorized water consumption, and calculated per capita residential water consumption. Per GFA m² non-residential water consumption was also calculated. Full details of this exercise are provided in Appendix C. 1 The scope of this study does not included detailed analysis (modelling) of the water distribution system. Preliminary-level assessments will be made of watermains which have the primary function of supplying water to each area of the Village (e.g. main outlets from Elevated Tank, rail crossings, river crossings, highway crossings).

83 - 4 - Chart 2 Historical Water Production and Consumption Excluding data prior to 2013 (which appears to contain inconsistencies, likely due to the timing of meter readings), the following conclusions were reached: Average residential per-capita water consumption is m³/person.day. This is at the low end of the range suggested by the MOECC Water Design Guidelines 2 but appears consistent with the recorded water production. Average non-residential water consumption is m³/m² GFA.day. Average non-revenue water (as a percentage of total water consumption) is 31%. This includes leakage, flushing and other hydrant use, unmetered use, etc. These values will be used for assessment of future water treatment and storage requirements. For analysis of watermains, the above consumption rates will be used for existing development. All growth will be analyzed using the demands provided in the City of Ottawa Water Design Guidelines 3. This approach ensures that sufficient capacity will be available within proposed watermain infrastructure for demands from new development (since developers are required to calculate such flows using the City of Ottawa guidelines). Peak factors for analysis of the water distribution system will be based on the City of Ottawa Water Design Guidelines. 2 Design Guidelines for Drinking Water Systems, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, 8 3 Ottawa Design Guidelines Water distribution, City of Ottawa, July 2010

84 The following table summarizes the design basis: Table 2 Water Distribution System Design Basis Treatment and Storage Facilities Existing Development Future Development Units Residential water consumption m³/person.day Non-residential water consumption m³/m² GFA.day Maximum Day Peak Factor x Average Day Maximum Hour Peak Factor x Maximum Day Non-revenue water 31% 31% % of water consumption Distribution System Residential water consumption m³/person.day Non-residential water consumption m³/m² GFA.day Residential Maximum Day Peak Factor x Average Day Residential Maximum Hour Peak Factor x Maximum Day Non-Residential Maximum Day Peak Factor x Average Day Non-Residential Maximum Hour Peak Factor x Maximum Day Non-revenue water 31% 31% % of water consumption 2.6 Sanitary Design Basis Residential (per capita) and Non-Residential (per GFA m²) sewage flow rates are estimated by assuming that 80% of water consumption is returned to sewers. For assessment of total sewage flows to the treatment lagoons, average annual extraneous flow is significant. This has been estimated based on a per hectare basis by considering the existing drainage area (179 ha), historical estimated sewage production, and measured total sewage received (Chart 3). Ignoring data prior to 2013 (which appears to be inconsistent), the average estimated extraneous flow is l/s.gross ha. 4 Calculated from water treatment plant flow records. 5 Calculated from water treatment plant flow records. 6 Derived from City of Ottawa guideline of 28,000 l/gross ha.day for commercial water consumption, considering 61% gross:net ratio suggested by City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines, and an estimated GFA:net ratio of 30%.

85 - 6 - Chart 3 Historical Estimated Extraneous Flow Assessment of flows within the sanitary sewer network requires consideration of peak (wet weather) extraneous flow. In the absence of available flow monitoring data, l/s.gross ha will be used in accordance with the City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines. The following table summarizes the basis for analysis of the sanitary sewage system: Table 3 Sanitary Sewage Design Basis Treatment Facilities Existing Development Future Development Units Residential sewage production m³/person.day Non-Residential sewage production m³/m² GFA.day Average Annual Extraneous Flow l/s.gross ha Sanitary Sewers and Pumping Stations Residential sewage production m³/person.day Non-Residential sewage production m³/m² GFA.day Peak Factor Harmon Equation Harmon Equation Peak Extraneous Flow l/s.gross ha 7 Derived from City of Ottawa guideline of 50,000 l/gross ha.day for commercial sewage flow, considering 61% gross:net ratio suggested by City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines, and an estimated GFA:net ratio of 30%.

86 Analysis 3.1 Water Treatment Plant The Water Treatment Plant (WTP) currently has a rated capacity of 3,182 m³/d. The WTP capacity is required to meet the maximum day demand. Peak flows will be met through use of equalization storage within the clearwells and elevated tank. To allow full utilization of equalization storage within the clearwells, the high lift pumps should meet the maximum hour demand. To assess which components of the Water Treatment Plant require upgrade, the capacity of each main component of the plant has assessed ( Chart 1). As indicated by the calculations in Appendix D, the 2018 maximum day demand is estimated to be 1,895 m³/d. By 2036 this is forecast to increase to 2,675 m³/d. All assessed components of the treatment plant have sufficient capacity to meet the maximum day demand. To continue to match maximum hourly demand, and upgrade of the high lift pumps is required. An upgrade to 3,940 m³/d capacity is proposed (installation of one additional 19 l/s pump). Chart 4 Water Treatment Plant Capacity

87 Water Storage Water storage is currently provided by two clearwells at the WTP (total storage 855 m³) and an elevated tank (1,600 m³). Water storage provides fire storage, equalization storage and emergency storage. The MOECC Water Design Guidelines specify the required storage volumes, based on population and maximum day demand. The calculations in Appendix D indicate that the required elevated tank storage will exceed 80% of capacity in A modelling study is required in advance of this project to more accurately assess the requirements for water storage. For planning purposes the elevated tank upgrade is included in the capital program for construction in Subject to the outcomes of the modelling study, it may be possible to delay construction of the elevated tank upgrade. Clearwell storage is sufficient for the study period. Chart 5 Elevated Tank Upgrade Requirements 3.3 Water Distribution System The core water distribution system was constructed in the 1970 s, and since then has been expanded to newer areas of the Village, most recently with a second river crossing to service the Domaine De La Rivière Nation subdivision. Key requirements to satisfy growth-related demands are shown on Figure 4, and are as follows:

88 - 9 - Construction of a watermain to service future development south of Highway 417. Highway crossings have already been installed, so the additional work needed is extension of 300 mm watermains to create a looped system. Construction of a watermain to extend water service to development in the north-east of the Village. Upgrade of watermains within the Village core to improve capacity of the distribution system. Modelling is necessary to confirm exact requirements, but based on a preliminary assessment of watermain velocities, the anticipated requirement has been included in the capital program. 3.4 Wastewater Treatment The Village recently completed a Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) to identify any necessary upgrades to the wastewater treatment system 8. The Class EA included updated population and flow projections, and concluded that although the currently approved theoretical rated capacity of the existing lagoon is not anticipated to be exceeded in the 10-year or 20-year design period projections, there are other factors which currently limit the actual operational capacity of the lagoon. These factors will need to be addressed to ensure the community can be appropriately serviced over the design periods. The Class EA identified a preferred solution of improvements to the treatment system with a new design capacity of 1,890 m³/d. This is a slight reduction from the currently approved theoretical rated capacity of 2,110 m³/d. The proposed improvements comprise a new specialized treatment system and new discharge windows, combined with the additional of baffles to the primary lagoon cells, at a total capital cost of $ M. MH has prepared new population and flow projections (Appendix E) using the updated forecasts provided by Watson and the design basis described in Section 3 above. Chart 6 illustrates these projections, and shows that the design capacity proposed by the Class EA is appropriate for the study period. Chart 6 Wastewater Treatment Lagoon Capacity 8 Casselman Wastewater Treatment System, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, Phase 2 Report (Notice of Completion posted November 15, 2017)

89 Sanitary Sewers To complete an assessment of pump station, lift station and trunk sanitary sewer capacity, MH divided the Village into 16 drainage areas (Figure 3), and calculated existing and forecast flows for each (Appendix F). Sewer analysis spreadsheets were prepared for the main sewer run from the industrial park to pump station 1, and for the main sewer run from the northwest extent of the Village to pump station 6. The analysis indicated that while the upstream portion of the sewer from the industrial park has sufficient capacity for 2036 flows, a 375 m length on Montcalm and St Joseph Streets just upstream of pump station 1 is expected to be operating at over 80% capacity by Upsizing of this 500 mm diameter sewer to 600 mm diameter is therefore proposed. As expected, the recently-constructed northwest quadrant trunk sewer was found to have sufficient capacity for 2036 flows. The firm capacity of each pump station was compared to projected flows (Chart 7). Peak flows to pump stations 1, 2, 5, and 6 will exceed 80% of firm capacity before Upgrades of these pump stations are therefore necessary. Where forcemain velocities will exceed 1.0 m/s, upsizing of the forcemain is proposed alongside pump station upgrades. Chart 7 Upgrade requirements for sewage pump stations

90 Additional growth-related requirements within the sanitary sewer system are: A sanitary sewer along Highway 700 to service new development south of Highway 417, with a new pump station at the intersection of Rue Principale and Highway 700. (A forcemain from this location to the industrial park has already been constructed). A sanitary sewer between Laurier and Brisson streets to service new development in the northeast of the Village. 4. Cost Estimates The capital cost of each of the proposed projects has been estimated using one of the following methods: 1. Direct estimation of costs based on estimate quantities and unit rates from tenders recently closed in Ottawa/eastern Ontario. 2. Use of cost estimation curves provided by Burnside Water and Wastewater Asset Cost Study 9 updated to late 2017 values by use of the Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index 10. Annual Operation and Maintenance costs for each of the proposed projects were estimated as a percentage of capital costs. 5. Capital Program Table 4Table 1 provides the proposed program of works to meet growth-related water and sewer capital project needs up to To determine the portion of capital costs recoverable through Development Charges, deductions must be made for Post Period Benefits, Local Servicing and Benefits to Existing Development. These are determined as follows: Post Period Benefit: the percentage of the capacity of an upgrade (or piece of new infrastructure) which will not be utilized until after Local Servicing: sanitary sewers 250mm and below and pump stations servicing sanitary sewers of 250mm and below; and watermains of mm diameter and below. Benefit to Existing: the portion of the cost of a project which would be required regardless of growth (e.g. asset renewal). Appendix G provides details of these deductions, as well as estimated operation and maintenance costs. 9 Water and Wastewater Asset Cost Study, Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal, RJ Burnside and Associates Limited, May Statistics Canada Table

91 Table 4 Capital Program Year # Name Phase Type CC 1 CC 2a CC 2b Northwest Quadrant PS and Forcemain Northwest Quadrant Rue Principale Sanitary Sewer Northwest Quadrant Sarah- Fillion-Martin- Maria-Francess- Riviere Sanitary Sewer Water distribution network modelling Capital Cost Estimate (2018 $) Construction Sanitary $713,179 Actual cost Construction Sanitary $1,217,497 Actual cost Construction Sanitary $1,691,430 Actual cost Design Water $50,000 Comments Confirm water tower upgrade requirement and distribution system capacity 2019 Water Tower Design Water $135,000 2 Second elevated tank 2020 Capacity Upgrade Construction Water $1,351, Sewage Treatment Design Sanitary $518,000 Cost estimate from 2017 Class Lagoon Upgrade Construction Sanitary $5,182,000 EA 2019 High Lift Pump Design Water $21,000 Installation of additional pump 4 (assumed that electrical/ 2020 Upgrade Construction Water $212,000 building modifications required) 2021 Pump Station 1 Design Sanitary $9,000 Capacity increase (pump Upgrade Construction Sanitary $95,000 station upgrade assumed) 2021 Forcemain for Design Sanitary $149,000 6 Second forcemain 2022 Pump Station 1 Construction Sanitary $1,485, Design Sanitary $ 74,000 Sanitary sewer Nation View Village Construction Sanitary $384,000 (Brisson-Laurier) development + oversizing 2023 Construction Sanitary $356, Watermain Design Water $72,000 Nation View Village (Brisson-Laurier) Construction Water $721,000 development + oversizing 2027 Pump Station 2 Design Sanitary $84,000 Capacity increase (pump 9 station replacement assumed 2028 Upgrade Construction Sanitary $841,000 due to large increase) 2027 Pump Station 5 Design Sanitary $3,000 Capacity increase (installation Upgrade Construction Sanitary $26,000 of new pumps) 2028 Water Distribution Design Water $104,000 Capacity increase for main System Upsizing Construction Water $1,040,000 water distribution system 2031 Pump Station 7 Design Sanitary $118,000 New pump station to service Construction Construction Sanitary $1,180,000 development south of Hwy Sanitary sewer Design Sanitary $59,000 Servicing development south of (Hwy 700) Construction Sanitary $585,000 Hwy 417

92 Year # Name Phase Type Capital Cost Estimate (2018 $) Comments 2031 Watermain (South Design Water $100,000 Servicing development south of of Hwy 417) Construction Water $1,003,000 Hwy Pump Station 6 Design Sanitary $6,000 Capacity increase (installation Upgrade Construction Sanitary $57,000 of new pumps) 2036 Sanitary (Montcalm Design Sanitary $50,000 Capacity increase (upsizing of 16 & St Joseph to 2037 sewers) PS1) Construction Sanitary $500, Conclusions and Recommendations MH has completed an analysis of the capacity of the existing communal water and sanitary systems for current and projected flows, and has developed a program of growth-related water and sewer capital project needs to The capital program is based on growth forecasts and projected distributions of growth. Actual project needs (timing and scope) should be reassessed regularly in light of actual growth and updated forecasts. The timing and scope of upgrades should also consider asset renewal requirements for example, it is less disruptive and more cost-effective to combine sewer upsizing with road reconstruction. The scope of this study did not included detailed analysis (modelling) of the water distribution system. It is recommended that a modelling study be completed to assess the needs for expansion/upgrading of watermains to meet growth-related water demands and fire servicing. The scope of the modelling study should include detailed assessment of water storage and high lift pump capacity requirements. 7. Closure We trust that this report is sufficient for your current requirements. Please contact the undersigned with any questions or clarifications. Sincerely, Morrison Hershfield Limited James Fookes, P.Eng., C.Eng.

93 Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Existing Water Distribution System Existing Sanitary Sewer Network Sewer Drainage Areas Water Distribution Expansion Sanitary Sewer Expansion Appendices Appendix A Historical and forecast population and employment data provided by Watson Appendix B and Non-Residential Area by Sewer Drainage Area Appendix C Water and Wastewater Balance Appendix D Water Treatment Plant and Water Storage Analysis Appendix E Wastewater Treatment Analysis Appendix F Sanitary Sewer and Pumping Station Analysis Appendix G Capital Program

94 FIGURES

95 DES CEDRES ISABELLE ALICE STE-ANNE ROUTE 500 DU BOISE ROUTE 500 ¹ LAFONTAINE SARAH FRANCESS FILION DORE 250 MARTIN MARIA NATURE MARIA MARQUETTE ARGILE MERCIER BARRAGE LAVAL LEVESQUE PERCY DESNOYERS YVON RIVIERE NATION ST-JEAN ST-JOSEPH ST-ISIDORE South Nation River BRISSON MONTCALM DOLLARD CARTIER 250 BREBEUF CASTONGUAY ST-PAUL 100 LAURIER ROUTE 600 ALBERT ST-JOSEPH FAUCHER DES EPINETTES PROMENADE DES ERABLES GAGNE BOILEAU RICHER STE-MARIE LAFLECHE PRINCIPALE RACINE 417 RAMP ROGER INDUSTRIEL 417 RAMP RAMP 417 RAMP 300 Legend Watermain (diameter in mm) Waterbody Road Casselman Boundary AURELE Water Tower Water Treatment Plant Scale: Title: ROUTE 700 1:16, Meters Existing Water Distribution System Figure 1 Village of Casselman Project No.: Date: 2432 February 2018 C:\Users\VProag\Desktop\New folder (2)\FIGURE 1.mxd

96 ALICE STE-ANNE ¹ ROUTE 500 LAFONTAINE SARAH FRANCESS DORE FILION MARTIN!( 250 DU BOISE MARIA FRANCESS NATURE 250 MARQUETTE ARGILE PS # BARRAGE LAVAL LEVESQUE PERCY DESNOYERS PS #6 450!( YVON ST-JEAN!( 500 PS # BRISSON 250 BREBEUF 500 ST-ISIDORE 400 LAURIER ROUTE !( PS #5 375 ISABELLE FAUCHER RIVIERE NATION DOLLARD South Nation River ST-JOSEPH CASTONGUAY ST-PAUL Cell #1 Cell #2 ROUTE 600 Cell #3 ALBERT DES EPINETTES!( PS #2 LAFLECHE STE-MARIE 300 RACINE 417 RAMP 417 RICHER INDUSTRIEL!( PS # RAMP PRINCIPALE RAMP 417 RAMP Legend!( Sanitary Pumping Station Sanitary Sewer Network (diameter in mm) Road Lagoon Waterbody Casselman Boundary AURELE 250!( PS #7 Forcemain (diameter in mm) Scale: Title: ROUTE 700 1:16, Meters Existing Sanitary Sewer Network Figure 2 Village of Casselman Project No.: Date: 2432 February 2018 C:\Users\VProag\Desktop\New folder (2)\FIGURE 2.mxd

97 ALICE STE-ANNE ROUTE 500 DU BOISE ROUTE 500 ¹ LAFONTAINE SARAH FRANCESS DORE FILION MARTIN NATURE! South Nation River 250 MARIA FRANCESS 250 ARGILE PS # BARRAGE 9 LEVESQUE PERCY DESNOYERS ! YVON PS #6 7 LAVAL RIVIERE NATION ST-JEAN! BRISSON PS #1 MONTCALM CARTIER DOLLARD BREBEUF ST-ISIDORE LAURIER Cell #1 Cell #2 ROUTE 600 Cell #3 PROMENADE DES ERABLES 6! PS #5 4 ISABELLE ST-JOSEPH CASTONGUAY DES EPINETTES! PS #2 FAUCHER 5 STE-MARIE 417 RAMP 417 BOILEAU 3 ROGER RICHER 2 PRINCIPALE RACINE PS #3! RAMP RAMP RAMP AURELE 11! PS #7 ROUTE 700 Legend! Sanitary Pumping Station Existing Catchment Area Future Catchment Area Sanitary Sewer Network Road Lagoon Waterbody Casselman Boundary (diameter in mm) Forcemain (diameter in mm) Catchment Number Scale: Title: 1:16, Meters Sewer Drainage Areas Figure 3 Village of Casselman Project No.: Date: 2432 February 2018 C:\Users\VProag\Desktop\New folder (2)\FIGURE 3.mxd

98 DES CEDRES ALICE STE-ANNE ROUTE 500 DU BOISE ROUTE 500 ¹ LAFONTAINE SARAH FRANCESS FILION DORE MARTIN MARIA 250 NATURE MARIA MARQUETTE ARGILE MERCIER BARRAGE LAVAL LEVESQUE PERCY DESNOYERS YVON ST-JOSEPH RIVIERE NATION ST-JEAN ST-ISIDORE South Nation River CARTIER BRISSON MONTCALM DOLLARD BREBEUF CASTONGUAY ST-PAUL 100 LAURIER ROUTE 600 ALBERT DES EPINETTES South Nation River PROMENADE DES ERABLES ISABELLE GAGNE BOILEAU RICHER FAUCHER STE-MARIE ST-JOSEPH LAFLECHE PRINCIPALE RACINE 417 RAMP ROGER INDUSTRIEL 417 RAMP RAMP 417 RAMP 300 Legend Watermain(diameter in mm) Waterbody Road Casselman Boundary 300 AURELE Water Tower Water Treatment Plant Future Watermain (diameter in mm) Scale: Title: ROUTE 700 1:16, Meters Water Distribution Expansion Figure 4 Village of Casselman Project No.: Date: 2432 February 2018 C:\Users\VProag\Desktop\New folder (2)\FIGURE 4.mxd

99 ALICE STE-ANNE ¹ ROUTE 500 LAFONTAINE SARAH FRANCESS DORE FILION PS #4 250 MARTIN!( 250 DU BOISE 100 MARIA FRANCESS NATURE 250 MARQUETTE ARGILE BARRAGE South Nation River LAVAL LEVESQUE PERCY DESNOYERS PS #6 450!( YVON !( PS # BREBEUF BRISSON ST-ISIDORE 400 LAURIER ROUTE ISABELLE PS #5!( 375 FAUCHER RIVIERE NATION ST-JEAN ST-JOSEPH ST-JOSEPH CASTONGUAY 375 ST-PAUL Cell #1 Cell #2 ROUTE 600 Cell #3 ALBERT DES EPINETTES!( PS #2 LAFLECHE 300 RACINE 417 RAMP 417 RICHER INDUSTRIEL!( PS #3 250 PRINCIPALE 417 RAMP417 RAMP RAMP Legend Road Lagoon Waterbody Casselman Boundary Forcemain Upgrade (diameter in mm) AURELE !( PS #7 Sanitary Sewer (diameter in mm) Forcemain (diameter in mm) Future Sanitary Sewer /upgrade Sanitary Pumping Station Sanitary Pumping Station Upgrade Village of Cassleman Scale: Title: Project No.: ROUTE 700 1:16, Meters Sanitary Sewer Expansion Date: Figure February 2018 C:\Users\VProag\Desktop\New folder (2)\FIGURE 5.mxd

100 APPENDIX A

101 Village of Casselman Inter-Censal Year Calculation P.P.U. Mid-6 Mid-7 Mid-8 Mid-9 Mid-2010 Mid-2011 Variables 6 (1-5 Yrs) Census Units Units Units Units Units Incremental by Dwelling Type - Low Density Medium Density High Density Total Units and Growth Census Year s 2 3,294 3,626 Factored Person Calculation Inter-Census Annual Mid-Year 3,294 3,400 3,471 3,522 3,557 3,626 Mid-6 Mid-7 Mid-8 Mid-9 Mid-2010 Mid-2011 Institutional Excluding Institutional 3,160 3,267 3,340 3,395 3,434 3,500 Total, Including Institutional 3,294 3,400 3,471 3,522 3,557 3,626 P.P.U. Mid-2011 Mid-2012 Mid-2013 Mid-2014 Mid-2015 Mid-2016 Variables 2011 (1-5 Yrs) Census Units Units Units Units Units Incremental by Dwelling Type - Low Density Medium Density High Density Total Units and Growth Census Year s 2 3,626 3,548 Factored Person Calculation Inter-Census Annual Mid-Year 3,626 3,624 3,598 3,576 3,562 3,548 Mid-2011 Mid-2012 Mid-2013 Mid-2014 Mid-2015 Mid-2016 Institutional Excluding Institutional 3,500 3,502 3,480 3,461 3,450 3,440 Total, Including Institutional 3,626 3,624 3,598 3,576 3,562 3,548 P.P.U. Mid-2016 Mid-2017⁴ Early-2018⁴ Variables 2016 (1-5 Yrs) Census Units Units Incremental by Dwelling Type - Low Density Medium Density High Density Total Units and Growth Census Year s 2 3,548 Factored Person Calculation Inter-Census Annual Mid-Year 3,548 3,570 3,559 Mid-2016 Mid-2017⁴ Early-2018⁴ Institutional Excluding Institutional 3,440 3,462 3,451 Total, Including Institutional 3,548 3,570 3,559 Notes: Total incremental population growth = Statistics Canada building permits issued by dwelling type (based on 6 month lag from construction to occupancy) x persons per unit (6, 2011 & 2016 households, 1-5 Years old PPU). 2. = Statistics Canada Census - 6, 2011 and Factored person calculation = 5-year population growth between Census years, apportioned based on annual population growth calculated from Statistics Canada building permits issued. The difference between the calculated population growth (based on building permits) and the 5-year population growth between census years represents estimated population decline in existing unit base. 4. Post 2016 population figures are based on 2016 Census data, plus building permits and Watson & Associates forecast data, less estimated population decline in existing households from Mid 2016 to Early H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

102 Schedule 1 Village of Casselman Residential Growth Forecast Summary Historical Forecast Incremental Year Including Census Undercount 1 Excluding Census Undercount Institutional Excluding Institutional Singles & Semi- Detached Housing Units Multiple Dwellings 2 Apartments3 Other Total Households Person Per Unit (PPU) Mid 1 3,010 2, , , Mid 6 3,410 3, , , Mid ,750 3, ,500 1, , Mid ,670 3, ,440 1, , Early ,680 3, ,451 1, , Early ,410 4, ,130 1, , Mid , 5, ,875 1, , 2.34 Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid ,520 1, , Source:, Census Undercount estimated at approximately 3.5%. Note: Including the Undercount has been rounded. 2. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 3. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments. Figure A-1 Annual Housing Forecast¹ Housing Units Years Historical Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average Source: Historical housing activity (7-2016) based on Statistics Canada building permits, Catalogue XIB 2017 housing growth derived by Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. 1. Growth Forecast represents calendar year H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

103 Schedule 2 Village of Casselman Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Single & Semi- Detached Multiples 1 Apartments 2 Total Residential Gross in Units New Units Existing Unit Change Net Increase Institutional Net Including Institutional Northwest Quadrant Outside of Northwest Quadrant Village of Casselman (82) (100) (88) (110) (169) ,634 (209) 1, ,469 Source:, Residential distribution based on a combination of historical permit activity, available housing supply and discussions with Village staff regarding future development prospects. 1. Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. 2. Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

104 Schedule 3 Village of Casselman Current Year Growth Forecast Mid 2016 to Early 2018 Mid ,548 Occupants of Units (2) 22 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.02 Mid 2016 to Early 2018 gross population increase Occupants of New Units (3) 0 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Mid 2016 to Early 2018 gross population increase 0 0 Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,425 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Mid 2016 to Early 2018 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,559 Net Increase, Mid 2016 to Early (1) 2016 population based on Statistics Canada Census unadjusted for Census Undercount. (2) Estimated residential units constructed, Mid 2016 to the beginning of the growth period, assuming a six month lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 0.75 Multiples (6) % 0.51 Apartments (7) % 0.76 Total 100% 2.02 ¹ Based on 2016 Census custom database ² Based on Building permit/completion activity (4) 2016 households taken from Statistics Canada Census. (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

105 Schedule 4 Village of Casselman Ten Year Growth Forecast Early 2018 to Early 2028 Early ,559 Occupants of Units (2) 359 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.37 Early 2018 to Early 2028 gross population increase Occupants of New Units (3) 19 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Early 2018 to Early 2028 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,447 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu decline rate (5) Early 2018 to Early 2028 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,260 Net Increase, Early 2018 to Early (1) Early 2018 based on: 2016 (3,548) + Mid 2016 to Early 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (22 x 2.02 = 44) + (1,425 x = -33) = 3,559 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 1.68 Multiples (6) % 0.21 Apartments (7) % 0.48 one bedroom or less 1.27 two bedrooms or more 1.37 Total 100% 2.37 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2018 households based upon 1,425 (2016 Census) + 22 (Mid 2016 to Early 2018 unit estimate) = 1,447 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

106 Schedule 5 Village of Casselman Early 2018 to Mid 2036 Early ,559 Occupants of Units (2) 704 New Housing Units, multiplied by persons per unit (3) 2.32 Early 2018 to Mid 2036 gross population increase 1,634 1,634 Occupants of New Units (3) 41 Equivalent Institutional Units, multiplied by persons per unit 1.10 Early 2018 to Mid 2036 gross population increase Decline in Housing Units (4) 1,447 Unit Occupancy, multiplied by ppu. decline rate (5) Early 2018 to Mid 2036 total decline in population Estimate to Early ,028 Net Increase, Early 2018 to Mid ,469 (1) Early 2018 based on: 2016 (3,548) + Mid 2016 to Early 2018 estimated housing units to beginning of forecast period (22 x 2.02 = 44) + (1,425 x = -33) = 3,559 (2) Based upon forecast building permits/completions assuming a lag between construction and occupancy. (3) Average number of persons per unit (ppu) is assumed to be: Persons % Distribution Weighted Persons Structural Type Per Unit¹ of Estimated Units² Per Unit Average Singles & Semi Detached % 1.58 Multiples (6) % 0.20 Apartments (7) % 0.54 one bedroom or less 1.27 two bedrooms or more 1.37 Total 100% 2.32 ¹ Persons per unit based on adjusted Statistics Canada Custom 2011 Census database. ² Forecast unit mix based upon historical trends and housing units in the development process. (4) Early 2018 households based upon 1,425 (2016 Census) + 22 (Mid 2016 to Early 2018 unit estimate) = 1,447 (5) Decline occurs due to aging of the population and family life cycle changes, lower fertility rates and changing economic conditions. (6) Includes townhomes and apartments in duplexes. (7) Includes bachelor, 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom+ apartments H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

107 Schedule 10 Village of Casselman Employment Forecast, 2018 to 2036 Activity Rate Employment Period Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Primary Work at Home Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Mid 1 2, ,550 Mid 6 3, ,690 Mid , ,051 Mid , ,725 Early , ,739 Early , , ,255 Mid , , ,450 Incremental Change Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid , Annual Average Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early Early Early Early Mid Source:, H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

108 Period Primary Schedule 10b Village of Casselman Employment and Gross Floor Area (GFA) Forecast, 2018 to 2036 Industrial Employment Commercial/ Related Institutional Gross Floor Area in Square Feet (Estimated)¹ Mid 1 2, , , , ,500 1,050,500 Mid 6 3, , , , ,000 1,140,300 Mid , , , , ,000 1,402, Mid , , , , ,500 1,204,800 Early , , , , ,500 1,212,500 Early , , , , , ,600 1,581, Mid , , , , , ,000 1,708,600 Incremental Change Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early , ,700 Early Early , ,600 75, ,700 Early Mid , , ,600 98, ,100 Total Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Total Annual Average Mid 1 - Mid Mid 6 - Mid Mid Mid Mid Early , ,133 Early Early ,000 12,360 7,510 36,870 Early Mid ,973 10,519 5,324 26,816 Source:, Square Foot Per Employee Assumptions Industrial 1,100 Commercial/ Related 550 Institutional H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

109 Schedule 10c Village of Casselman Estimate of the Anticipated Amount, Type and Location of Non-Residential Development for Which Development Charges can be Imposed Development Location Timing Industrial GFA S.F. Commercial GFA S.F. Institutional GFA S.F. Total Non-Res GFA S.F. Employment Increase 1 Northwest Quadrant Outside of Northwest Quadrant Village of Casselman Source:, Employment Increase does not include No Fixed Place of Work. 2. Square feet per employee assumptions: Industrial 1,100 Commercial 550 Institututional ,450-10, ,600 11,550 4,500 22, , , 75, , , ,050 94, , , ,600 75, , , ,600 98, , H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Growth\ 2018 DC Casselman Growth Forecast_Final

110 APPENDIX B

111 Appendix B - POPULATION PROJECTIONS Village of Casselman Drainage Area ID Area (ha) Category Location Development Developed Area (ha) Non- Residential Developed Area Non- Residential Developed Development Density Development GFA (m²) (ha) GFA (m²) Area (ha) (pop/ha) Density (pop/ha) Non-Residential East of River 100% , % , % , % , Non-Residential East of River 100% , % , % , % , Mixed East of River 100% , % , % , % , Mixed East of River 100% , % , % , % , Mixed East of River 80% , % , % , % , Residential East of River 100% % % % Mixed East of River 100% , % , % , % , Residential East of River 100% % % % Residential East of River 100% % % % Mixed East of River 50% ,487 50% ,309 50% , % , Residential East of River 100% % % % Mixed East of River 0% % % , % , Residential North West 0% % % % , Mixed North West 50% ,400 55% ,371 65% , % , Residential North West 0% % % % , Residential East of River 0% % % % Total , , , , , , , ,225 Total excluding non-residential Subtotals by location (excluding Non-Residential): North west , , ,012 6, ,748 6,503 East of River , , , , , , , ,722 Subtotal of Mixed, East of River Source: Mapping Approximate, based on landuse data Mapping Aerial Photo Calculated Calculated Total from Watson Associates. West/East split estimated then allocated to Mixed and Residential drainage areas prorata by area Total from Watson Associates. GFA in non-res drainage areas estimated from mapping. Remainder distributed to Mixed drainage areas prorata by area. Estimated Calculated Calculated Incremental growth in West/East areas from Watson Associates. Totals allocated to Mixed and Residential drainage areas prorata by area. Incremental growth in West/East areas from Watson Associates. Builtout GFA estimated for non-res drainage areas. Remainder distributed to mixed drainage areas pro-rata by area. Density (pop/ha) Non- Residential GFA (m²) Estimated Calculated Calculated Incremental growth in West/East areas from Watson Associates. Totals allocated to Mixed and Residential Incremental growth in West/East areas from Watson Associates. Builtout GFA estimated for non-res drainage areas. drainage areas prorata Remainder by area. distributed to mixed drainage areas pro-rata by area. Development Developed Area (ha) Ultimate Density (pop/ha) 100% for full build-out Calculated Assumed to remain as 2036 values for existing developed areas. Remaining population distributed evenly across all other lands (drops in density can be attributed to inclusion of nondevelopable lands in total area) Estimated from Hemson report assuming medium denisty development throughout Village East of River (which results in a higher population than low or high density development). NWQ pop. is 3,748 based on PS6 design report. Non- Residential GFA (m²) Village indicated that current net vacant industrial/ employment land supply is 34.1ha. Total GFA increase from 2016 total estimated by assuming full development at 30% Net:GFA ratio.

112 APPENDIX C

113 Appendix C Water Balance: Estimation of Per Capita Water Consumption and Percentage Water Loss Total water consumption Total water consumption (m³/day) Year Residential Multi Residential Total Residential Non Residential Total water consumption Source: analysis of billing data (sum of all accounts) Total water production (measured at plant) Source: Water Treatment Plant Records Total Water Loss % Water Loss (as % of Total Water Consumption) 6% 51% 4% 22% 42% 30% 30% Source: Total water production - total water consumption Estimation of percentage of homes with water service Number of 'Residential' accounts Source: billing data Total single, semi & townhomes Source: Watson Associates % with water service 97.9% 96.2% 96.5% 96.6% 96.3% 96.1% 96.5% Values in italics estimated by interpolation Estimation of Total residential population with water service Total residential population Source: Watson Associates Total residential population with water service Per capita water consumption (residential) Estimation of Non-Residential Water Consumption Rate Employment (number of employees) Primary Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Non Residential Gross Floor Area (sq ft) Primary Industrial 209, , , , , , , , , , ,000 Commercial/ Related 481, , , , , , , , , , ,250 Institutional 450, , 482, , , , , , 501, , ,500 Total (sq ft) 1,140,250 1,192,640 1,245,030 1,297,420 1,349,810 1,402, 1,362,710 1,323,220 1,283,730 1,244,240 1,204,750 Total (m²) 105, , , , , , , , , , ,925 Source: Watson Associates (interpolated values in italics) Note: Assumed that all non-residential properties have water service Non residential water consumption rate (m³/d.m² GFA) Non residential water consumption rate (l/d.ha GFA) 17,939 13,010 13,254 10,394 12,440 17,353 12,250 Estimation of extraneous flow contribution to sewers Source: Sewage Treatment Lagoon Total sewage received (measured at lagoons) Records Assumed % return to sewers 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% Source: estimate Estimated total return to sewers (m³/day) Estimated number of properties with water but no sewage Source: aerial photo. Note: all service single-family Persons per unit Source: Watson Associates Estimated population with water but no sewage service Estimated residential population with sewage service Water consumption by population with sewage service Estimated residential return to sewers (m³/day) Per capita sewage production (residential) % of sewage which is extraneous flow 52% 63% 33% 53% 53% 47% 54% Sewershed area (ha) Source: mapping Extraneous flow rate (calculated) (m³/day.gross ha) Extraneous flow rate (calculated) (l/s.gross ha) Conclusions % with water service 96.50% Per capita water consumption (residential) m³/day Non residential water consumption rate m³/d.m² GFA Percentage water loss (% of total water consumption) 31% Per capita sewage production (residential) Non residential sewage production rate Dry weather extraneous flow m³/day m³/d.m² GFA 3.8 m³/day.ha

114 APPENDIX D

115 Appendix D Water Treatment Plant and Water Storage Analysis Estimation of Total Residential Water Consumption Year Ultimate Total residential population (exc. Institutional) 3,440 3,451 3,791 4,130 4,503 4,875 8,240 Source: Watson Associates % with water service 96.5% 96.5% 96.5% 96.5% 96.5% 96.5% 100.0% Source: Water Balance Total residential population with water service 3,320 3,330 3,658 3,985 4,345 4,704 8,240 Calculated Per capita water consumption (residential) (m³/d) Source: Water Balance Total residential water consumption (m³/d) ,483 Calculated Values in italics estimated by interpolation Estimation of Total Non-Residential Water Consumption Ultimate Source: Watson Associates Employment (number of employees) Primary Industrial Commercial/ Related Institutional Non Residential Gross Floor Area (sq ft) Primary Industrial 231, , , , , ,500 Commercial/ Related 492, , , , , ,650 Institutional 481, , , , 567, ,600 Total (sq ft) 1,204,750 1,212,450 1,396,925 1,581,400 1,645,075 1,708,750 Total (m²) 111, , , , , , ,225 Utlimate GFA Source: Refer to Appendix B Non residential water consumption rate (m³/d.m² GFA) Source: Water Balance Total non-residential water consumption (m3/d) Calculated Total Required Average Water Production Total water consumption (m³/d) ,053 1,762 Percentage water loss 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% Source: Water Balance Total required average water production 1,077 1,081 1,199 1,316 1,421 1,526 2,553 Required Treatment Plant Capacity (Maximum Day) Max day peak factor (x Average Day) Source: Water Balance Required max day capacity (m³/d) 1,887 1,895 2,101 2,307 2,491 2,675 4,475 Treatment plant rated capacity (m³/d) 3,182 3,182 3,182 3,182 3,182 3,182 3,182 Source: Annual Reports Additional capacity (m³/d) 1,295 1,287 1, ,293 Source: Rated capacity - Required Capacity Required High Lift Pump Capacity (Maximum Hour) Max day peak factor (x Max Day) Source: Water Balance Required max hour capacity (m³/d) 3,184 3,196 3,544 3,892 4,202 4,513 7,548 High lift pumps firm capacity (m³/d) 3,283 3,283 3,283 3,283 3,283 3,283 3,283 Source: Village Additional capacity (m³/d) ,230-4,265 Source: Rated capacity - Required Capacity Water Storage Requirements Ultimate Non-Residential Area (ha) Source: Refer to Appendix B Density of surrounding residential lands (p/ha) Source: Refer to Appendix B Equivalent 3,620 3,908 4,252 4,595 4,975 5,354 Source: Non-Residential Area at 8,719 Density of Surrounding Lands Source: MOE Water Design Fire Flow (l/s) Guidelines, Table 8-1 Source: MOE Water Design Fire Duration (hrs) Guidelines, Table 8-1 A, Fire storage (m³) ,037 1,037 1,037 1,717 2,041 Calculated B, Equalization Storage (m³) Source: 25% of Max Day 1,119 Demand C, Emergency Storage (m³) Source: 25% of A + B Total required storage (m³) 1,715 1,717 1,953 2,017 2,075 2,983 3,950 Source: A + B + C Water tower storage capacity (m³) 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Source: Village Clearwell 1 storage capacity (m³) Source: Village Clearwell 2 storage capacity (m³) Source: Village Total storage capacity (m³) 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 Calculated

116 Ultimate Total required storage in tower (m³) 1,243 1,243 1,427 1,440 1,452 2,314 2,831 Source: A + C Water Tower % utilization 78% 78% 89% 90% 91% 145% 177% Total required storage in clearwell ,119 Source: B Clearwell % utilization 55% 55% 61% 67% 73% 78% 131%

117 APPENDIX E

118 Appendix E Wastewater Treatment Facility Total Residential Sewage Flow Ultimate Residential population with water service but not sewage Source: Water Balance Residential population with sewage service 3,018 3,330 3,658 3,985 4,345 4,704 8,240 Per capita sewage production (residential) Source: Water Balance Total Residential Sewage Flow (m³/d) ,187 Total Non-Residential Sewage Flow Non-residential GFA (m²) 111, , , , , ,748 Source: Watson Associates; 214,225 assumed all sewered Non residential sewage production rate Source: Water Balance Total Non-Residential Sewage Flow (m³/d) Total Extraneous Flow Estimated Developed Area by catchment (ha) Ultimate Source: Refer to Appendix B Total Annual average extraneous flow rate (m³/day.ha) Source: Water Balance Annual average extraneous flow (m³/day) ,043 1,845 Total Flow to Wastewater Treatment Lagoons Total average sewage flow (m³/day) 1,230 1,351 1,486 1,620 1,753 1,886 3,254 Current rated capacity of Wastewater lagoons (m³/day) 2,110 2,110 2,110 2,110 2,110 2,110 2,110 Source: Village Proposed capacity after improvements (m³/day) 1,890 1,890 1,890 1,890 1,890 1,890 1,890 Source: Class EA Available capacity (after improvements) (m³/day) ,364

119 APPENDIX F

120 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - East of River (Existing) 2018 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Pipe Information Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) , ,000 30, ,4,5, ,316 37, ,797 5, , ,487 35, Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Catchment No. Flow Data Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes, P.Eng. Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Average residential flow (L/s) Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

121 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - East of River (Existing) 2028 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) , 2, 11, ,000 33, ,4,5, ,316 53, ,797 7, , ,487 47, Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes, P.Eng. Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

122 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - East of River (Existing) 2036 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) , 2, 11, ,000 36, ,4,5, ,316 57, ,797 8, , ,487 50, Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes, P.Eng. Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

123 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - East of River (Existing) Ultimate Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) , 2, 11, ,000 75, ,4,5, ,316 45, ,797 6, , ,487 80, Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes, P.Eng. Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

124 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - Northwest Quadrant - Rue Principale 2018 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Pipe Information Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) MH8-MH ,400 4, MH9-MH MH10-MH MH11-MH MH12-MH MH13-MH MH14-MH MH15-MH MH16-MH MH17-MH MH18-MH MH19-MH MH20-MH MH21-MH21A MH21A-MH3A MH3A-PS Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Residential Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Average residential flow (L/s) Flow Data Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-Residential Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Flow Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: JLR drawings dated 21/02/ April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

125 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - Northwest Quadrant - Rue Principale 2028 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) MH8-MH ,400 5, MH9-MH MH10-MH MH11-MH MH12-MH MH13-MH MH14-MH MH15-MH MH16-MH MH17-MH MH18-MH MH19-MH MH20-MH MH21-MH21A MH21A-MH3A MH3A-PS Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Average residential flow (L/s) Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: JLR drawings dated 21/02/ April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

126 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - Northwest Quadrant - Rue Principale 2038 Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) MH8-MH ,400 6, MH9-MH MH10-MH MH11-MH MH12-MH MH13-MH MH14-MH MH15-MH MH16-MH MH17-MH MH18-MH MH19-MH MH20-MH MH21-MH21A MH21A-MH3A MH3A-PS Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Average residential flow (L/s) Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: JLR drawings dated 21/02/ April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

127 SANITARY SEWER CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman - Northwest Quadrant - Rue Principale Ultimate Conditions Location Pipe Number Start station Length (m) Diameter (m) Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Slope (%) Existing (2018) Individual Individual Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) MH8-MH ,400 6, MH9-MH MH10-MH MH11-MH MH12-MH MH13-MH MH14-MH MH15-MH MH16-MH MH17-MH MH18-MH MH19-MH MH20-MH MH21-MH21A MH21A-MH3A MH3A-PS Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Pipe Information Flow Data Extraneous Flow Invert Elevation (m) Obvert Elevation (m) Residential Non-Residential Peak Flow Catchment No. Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Average residential flow (L/s) Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) Equivalent Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: JLR drawings dated 21/02/ April 12, 2018 Total Flow (L/s) Capacity (L/s) Capacity Check Full Velocity (m/s) q/q

128 PUMP STATION CAPACITY CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman 2018 Conditions Location Pump Station Catchment No. Existing (2018) Individual Individual Residential Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) Flow Data Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-Residential Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) PS1 All 3,411 3,411 3, , , , , Forcemain Equivalent Peak Flow Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Total Flow (L/s) Capacity Check Capacity (L/s) q/q Diameter (m) Force Main Velocity at Peak Flow (m/s) PS ,214 18,214 18, PS ,000 25,000 25, Forcemain PS Forcemain PS ,794 10,794 10, Forcemain PS6 (NWQ) 13, 14, ,400 4,400 4, PS7 Not connected Forcemain Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Note: Pump station capacities provided by Village Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: N/A April 12, 2018

129 PUMP STATION CAPACITY CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman 2028 Conditions Location Pump Station Catchment No. Existing (2018) Individual Individual Residential Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) Flow Data Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-Residential Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) PS1 All 3,411 4,089 3, , , ,000 34, , Forcemain Equivalent Peak Flow Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Total Flow (L/s) Capacity Check Capacity (L/s) q/q Diameter (m) Force Main Velocity at Peak Flow (m/s) PS ,214 24,282 18,214 6, , PS ,000 28,500 25,000 3, Forcemain PS Forcemain PS ,794 17,988 10,794 7, Forcemain PS6 (NWQ) 13, 14, ,400 5,371 4, PS7 Not connected Forcemain Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Note: Pump station capacities provided by Village Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: N/A April 12, 2018

130 PUMP STATION CAPACITY CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman 2038 Conditions Location Pump Station Catchment No. Existing (2018) Individual Individual Residential Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) Flow Data Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-Residential Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) PS1 All 3,411 4,875 3,411 1, , , ,000 46, , Forcemain Equivalent Peak Flow Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Total Flow (L/s) Capacity Check Capacity (L/s) q/q Diameter (m) Force Main Velocity at Peak Flow (m/s) PS ,214 26,080 18,214 7, , PS ,000 28,500 25,000 3, Forcemain PS Forcemain PS ,794 19,320 10,794 8, , Forcemain PS6 (NWQ) 13, 14, , ,400 6,503 4,400 2, , PS7 11, , , Forcemain Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Note: Pump station capacities provided by Village Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: N/A April 12, 2018

131 PUMP STATION CAPACITY CALCULATION SHEET Village of Casselman Ultimate Conditions Location Pump Station Catchment No. Existing (2018) Individual Individual Residential Cumulative (Existing) Cumulative (Growth) Average residential flow (L/s) Flow Data Existing (2018) non-residential GFA (m²) Non-residential GFA (m²) Non-Residential Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Existing (m²) Cumulative nonresidential GFA, Growth (m²) Average nonresidential flow (L/s) PS1 All 3,451 8,240 3,451 4, , , , , , Forcemain Equivalent Peak Flow Peak Factor Peak Flow (L/s) Individual Catchment Area (ha) Extraneous Flow Cumulative Catchment Area (ha) Cumulative Peak Extraneous Flow (L/s) Total Flow (L/s) Capacity Check Capacity (L/s) q/q Diameter (m) Force Main Velocity at Peak Flow (m/s) PS ,214 20,584 18,214 20, , PS ,000 28,500 25,000 28, , Forcemain PS Forcemain PS ,794 15,248 10,794 15, , Forcemain PS6 (NWQ) 13, 14, , , ,400 6,503 4,400 6, , PS7 11, , , , Forcemain Assumptions: Analyzed Project: Existing & Development:: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Ved Proag Water and Sewer Capital Investment Plan Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Future & Development: Checked Location: Per capita sewage production (residential) m³/day Non residential sewage production rate m³/d.m² GFA James Fookes Casselman, Ontario Peak extraneous flow 0.28 l/s.ha Note: Pump station capacities provided by Village Dwg Reference: File Ref: Date: N/A April 12, 2018

132 APPENDIX G

133 Village of Casselman Appendix G - Growth-related water and sanitary requirements April 12, 2018 SANITARY Year Project No. Name Phase Type Diameter (mm) Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Capital Cost Estimate (2018 $) Annual Operation & Maintenance Cost Estimate (2018 $) Comments Post Period Benefit Comments Post Period Benefit Post Period Benefit Deduction Local Service Deduction applicable? Local Service Deduction Local Service Diameter (mm) Local Service Cost Local Service Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Applicable Local Service Deduction Benefit to Existing Applicable? Benefit to Existing Existing Diameter (mm) Benefit to Existing Cost Existing Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Applicable BTE Deduction Net DC Recoverable Cost 2018 CC1 Northwest Quadrant PS and Forcemain Construction Sanitary $ 713,179 $ 18, Village component of actual cost 65% Pump station (other than pumps) sized for ultimate flows $ 463,567 No No $ 249, CC2a Northwest Quadrant Rue Principale Sanitary Sewer Construction Sanitary /300 $ 1,217,497 $ 6, Actual Cost 78% All residential growth in catchments 14 and 15 $ 949,648 No No $ 267, CC2b Northwest Quadrant Sarah-Fillion-Martin-Maria- Francess-Riviere Sanitary Sewer Construction Sanitary $ 1,691,430 $ 8, Actual Cost N/A Local service 100% local servicing $ 1,691, N/A - 100% local servicing $ - Upgrade is to Design Sanitary $ 518,000 $ - 0% $ - $ 518,000 flows No - Lagoon performance 3 Sewage Treatment Lagoon Upgrade Cost estimate from 2017 Class EA No is adequate with current 2020 Construction Sanitary $ 5,182,000 $ 80, % $ - flows $ 5,182, Design Sanitary $ 9,000 $ - Capacity increase (pump station 68% $ 6,120 No - estimate is for $ 2,880 5 Pump Station 1 Upgrade No 2022 Construction Sanitary 201 $ 95,000 $ 2, upgrade assumed) 68% $ 64,600 addition of pumps $ 30, Design Sanitary $ 149,000 $ - 68% $ 101,320 No - upgrade is capacity $ 47,680 6 Forcemain for Pump Station 1 Second forcemain No 2022 Construction Sanitary $ 1,485,000 $ 7, % $ 1,009,800 driven $ 475, 2022 Design Sanitary $ 74,000 $ - 32% $ 4,800 $ 59,000 $ 10, Sewer to service Nation View only Sanitary sewer (Brisson-Laurier) Construction Sanitary $ 384,000 $ 2, Nation View Village development + would be approx. 250/mm 32% $ 19,840 oversizing diameter rather than 450/375mm, $ 322,000 No $ 42,160 so proposed sewer is DC eligble Construction Sanitary $ 356,000 $ 2, % $ 8, $ 331,000 $ 17, Design Sanitary $ 84,000-9 Pump Station 2 Upgrade 2028 Construction Sanitary 39 $ 841,000 21, $ Capacity increase (pump station 87% $ - $ 84,000 $ - Yes - but 100% deducted replacement assumed due to large 100% local servicing for local servicing. $ increase) 87% $ - $ 841,000 $ Design Sanitary $ 3,000 $ - Capacity increase (installation of 85% $ 2,535 No - estimate is for $ Pump Station 5 Upgrade No 2028 Construction Sanitary 29 $ 26,000 $ 1, new pumps) 85% $ 21,970 addition of pumps $ 4, Design Sanitary $ 118,000 $ - New pump station to service 91% $ 107,616 No - required for any development $ 10, Pump Station 7 Construction No 2032 Construction Sanitary 65 $ 1,180,000 $ 30, development south of Hwy % $ 1,076,160 south of Hwy 417 $ 103, Design Sanitary $ 59,000 $ - 82% $ 48,380 $ 10,620 No - similar to Rue Principale Servicing development south of 13 Sanitary sewer (Hwy 700) sewer - provides trunk servicing No Hwy 417 for development south of Hwy Construction Sanitary $ 585,000 $ 3, % $ 479,700 $ 105, Design Sanitary $ 6,000 $ - Capacity increase (installation of 95% $ 5,724 No - serves all development in No - estimate is for $ Pump Station 6 Upgrade 2036 Construction Sanitary 70 $ 57,000 $ 1, new pumps) 95% $ 54,378 NWQ addition of pumps $ 2, Design Sanitary $ 50,000 $ - 96% $ 5,760 $ 44,000 $ 240 Capacity increase (upsizing of 16 Sanitary (Montcalm & St Joseph to PS1) No Yes - replacement of pipes $ 309, Construction Sanitary $ 500,000 $ 3, sewers) 96% $ 20,160 $ $ 170, $ 15,383,106 $ 184,000 $ 4,450,077 $ 3,328,430 $ 353,000 $ 7,081,599 WATER Year Project No. Name Phase Type Diameter (mm) Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Capital Cost Estimate (2018 $) Annual Operation & Maintenance Cost Estimate (2018 $) Water distribution network modelling Design Water $ 50,000 $ - Comments Confirm water tower upgrade requirement and distribution system capacity Post Period Benefit Post Period Benefit Comments Post Period Benefit Deduction Local Service Deduction applicable? Local Service Diameter (mm) Local Service Cost Local Service Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Applicable Local Service Deduction Existing Diameter (mm) Existing Length (m), Flow (l/s) or Capacity (Ml) Applicable BTE Deduction 0% $ - No No $ 50, Design Water $ 135,000 $ - 39% $ 52,262 No - estimate is for second $ 82,738 2 Water Tower Capacity Upgrade Second elevated tank No tank rather than 2020 Construction Water $ 1,351,000 $ 14, % $ 523,005 replacement $ 827,995 Installation of additional pump Upgrade is sufficient to 2019 Design Water 19 $ 21,000 $ - 25% $ 5,250 No - estimate is for $ 15,750 4 High Lift Pump Upgrade (assumed that electrical/building approx No addition of pumps 2020 Construction Water $ 212,000 $ 5, modifications required) 25% $ 53,000 $ 159, Design Water $ 72,000 $ - 32% $ 4,800 Watermain to service Nation View $ 57,000 $ 10, Nation View Village development + only estimated to be mm 8 Watermain (Brisson-Laurier) No oversizing diameter so proposed watermain 2023 Construction Water $ 721,000 $ 4, % $ 30,720 is DC-eligble 910 $ 625,000 $ 65,280 Local Service Deduction Benefit to Existing Applicable? Benefit to Existing Benefit to Existing Cost Net DC Recoverable Cost 2028 Design Water $ 104,000 $ - 47% 21, Water Distribution System Upsizing Capacity increase for main water distribution system $ Yes - rehabilitation of $ 59,000 $ 23,934 watermains would No otherwise be required Construction Water $ 1,040,000 $ 5, % $ 211,595 Deduction is cost of lining $ 588,000 $ 240, Design Water $ 100,000 $ - Servicing development south of 82% $ 82,000 No - required for any development $ 18, Watermain (South of Hwy 417) No 2032 Construction Water $ 1,003,000 $ 5, Hwy % $ 822,460 south of Hwy 417 $ 180,540 $ 4,809, $ 1,806, $ 682, $ 647, $ 1,673,842.55

134 Page C-1 Appendix C Proposed Development Charge By-law Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

135 Page C-2 Appendix C Proposed Development Charge By-law The Corporation of the Village of Casselman By-Law No Being a By-law With Respect to Development Charges WHEREAS the Village of Casselman will experience growth through development and re-development; AND WHEREAS development and re-development requires the provision of physical and social services by the Village of Casselman; AND WHEREAS Council desires to ensure that the capital cost of meeting growthrelated demands for or burden on municipal services does not place an excessive financial burden on the Village of Casselman or its existing taxpayers, while at the same time ensuring new taxpayers contribute no more than the net capital cost attributable to providing the current level of municipal services; AND WHEREAS the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the Act ) provides that the Council of a Village may by by-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services; AND WHEREAS a development charge background study has been completed in accordance with the Act; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Village of Casselman has given notice of and held a public meeting on the day of May, 2018 in accordance with the Act and the regulations thereto; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE Village OF CASSELMAN ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Interpretation 1.1 In this By-law the following items shall have the corresponding meanings: Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

136 Study.docx Page C-3 accessory use means a use, including a building or structure, which is commonly incidental, subordinate and exclusively devoted to the main use or main building situated on the same lot; Act means the Development Charges Act, 1997, as amended, or any successor thereof; apartment unit means any residential unit within a building containing four or more dwelling units, all having a common entrance from the outside or a common hall or halls, but shall not include a townhouse or row dwellings; bedroom means a habitable room which can be used as sleeping quarters, but does not include a bathroom, living room, dining room or kitchen; board of education has the same meaning as set out in the Education Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. E.2, as amended, or any successor thereof; bona fide farm uses means the proposed development that will qualify as a farm business operating with a valid Farm Business Registration Number issued by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and be assessed in the Farmland Realty Tax Class by the Ontario Property Assessment Corporation; Building Code Act means the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, as amended, or any successor thereof; capital cost means costs incurred or proposed to be incurred by the Village or a local board thereof directly or by others on behalf of and as authorized by the Village or local board, (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest, to improve land, to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures, to acquire, construct or improve facilities including, (i) rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, (ii) furniture and equipment other than computer equipment, (iii) material acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a library board as defined in the Public Libraries Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. P.44, as amended, or any successor thereof; to undertake studies in connection with any matter under the Act and any of the matters in clauses (a) to (d) above, including the development charge background study required for the provision of services designated H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

137 Page C-4 (f) in this By-law within or outside the Village, including interest on borrowing for those expenditures under clauses (a) to (e) above that are growthrelated; and for interest on money borrowed to pay for costs described in clauses (a) to (d) above; commercial means any use of land, structures or buildings for the purposes of buying, renting or selling commodities and services, but does not include industrial or agricultural uses, but does include hotels, motels, motor inns and boarding, lodging and rooming houses; Council means the Council of the Village of Casselman; Demolition permit means a permit allowing demolition as required by the Building Code Act; development means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that increases the size of, usability thereof, or change of use thereof, and includes redevelopment; development charge means a charge imposed with respect to this By-law; dwelling unit means a room or rooms located within a building or structure which are occupied or designed or intended to be occupied by one or more persons as a single housekeeping unit and for which a separate private entrance (from outdoors or a common hallway), bathroom and kitchen facilities are provided; but does not mean or include tent, trailer, or a room or a suite of rooms in a boarding house, hotel, motel, motor home or tourist home; existing means the number, use and size that existed as of the date this by-law was passed; farm building means that part of a bona fide farming operation encompassing barns, silos and other ancillary development to an agricultural use, but excludes residential uses; gross floor area means: (a) in the case of a residential building or structure, the total area of all floors above grade of a dwelling unit measured between the outside surfaces of Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

138 Page C-5 (b) exterior walls or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the dwelling unit from any other dwelling unit or other portion of a building; and in the case of a non-residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixed-use building or structure in respect of the non-residential portion thereof, the total area of all building floors above or below grade measured between the outside surfaces of the exterior walls, or between the outside surfaces of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing a nonresidential use and a residential use, except for: (i) a room or enclosed area within the building or structure above or below that is used exclusively for the accommodation of heating, cooling, ventilating, electrical, mechanical or telecommunications equipment that service the building; (ii) loading facilities above or below grade; and (iii) a part of the building or structure below grade that is used for the parking of motor vehicles or for storage or other accessory use; industrial means lands, buildings or structures used or designed or intended for use for manufacturing, processing, fabricating or assembly of raw goods, warehousing or bulk storage of goods, and includes office uses and the sale of commodities to the general public where such uses are accessory to an industrial use, but does not include the sale of commodities and the supplying of personal services or as otherwise defined in the zoning by-law; institutional means land, buildings, structures or any part thereof used by any organization, group or association for promotion of charitable, educational or benevolent objectives and not for profit or gain; Local Board means a school board, municipal service board, transportation commission, public library board, board of health, police services board, planning board, or any other board, commission, committee, body or local authority established or exercising any power or authority under any general or special Act with respect to any of the affairs or purposes, including school purposes, of a Village or of two or more municipalities or parts thereof; local services means those services, facilities or things which are under the jurisdiction of the Village of Casselman and are related to a plan of subdivision or within the area to which the plan relates in respect of the lands under Sections Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

139 Page C-6 41, 51 or 53 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. P.13, as amended, or any successor thereof; multiple dwellings means all dwellings other than single detached, semidetached and apartment unit dwellings; municipality means the Corporation of the Village of Casselman; non-residential use means a building or structure of any kind whatsoever used, designed or intended to be used for other than a residential use; Official Plan means the Official Plan adopted by the Village, as amended and approved; Owner means the owner of land or a person who has made application for an approval for the development of land upon which a development charge is imposed; place of worship means that part of a building or structure that is exempt from taxation as a place of worship under the Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. A.31, as amended, or any successor thereof; Rate means the interest rate established weekly by the Bank of Canada based on Treasury Bills having a term of 91 days; regulation means any regulation made pursuant to the Act; Residential Dwelling means a building, occupied or capable of being occupied as a home, residence or sleeping place by one or more persons, containing one or more dwelling units but not including motels, hotels, tents, truck campers, tourist trailers, mobile camper trailers, or boarding, lodging or rooming houses; Residential use means the use of a building or structure or portion thereof for one or more dwelling units; this also includes a dwelling unit on land that is used for an agricultural use; row dwelling means a building containing three or more attached dwelling units in a single row, each of which dwelling units has an independent entrance from the outside and is vertically separated from any abutting dwelling unit; semi-detached dwelling means a dwelling unit in a residential building consisting of two dwelling units having one vertical wall or one horizontal wall, but Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

140 Page C-7 not other parts, attached or another dwelling unit where the residential units are not connected by an interior corridor; service means a service designed in Schedule A to this By-law, and services shall have a corresponding meaning; servicing agreement means an agreement between a landowner and the municipality relative to the provision of municipal services to specified land within the municipality; single detached dwelling unit means a residential building consisting of one dwelling unit and not attached to another structure; Village means the area within the geographic limits of the Village of Casselman; and Zoning By-Law means the Zoning By-Law of the Village of Casselman or any successor thereof passed pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, S.O Designation of Services 2.1 The categories of services for which development charges are imposed under this By-law are as follows: (a) (b) Water Services; and Wastewater Services. 2.2 The components of the services designated in Section 2.1 are described in Schedule A. 3. Application of By-law Rules 3.1 Development charges shall be payable in the amounts set out in this By-law where: (a) (b) the lands are located in the area described in Section 3.2; and the development of the lands requires any of the approvals set out in subsection 3.4(a). Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

141 Page C-8 Area to Which By-law Applies 3.2 Subject to Section 3.3, this By-law applies to all lands in the Village of Casselman whether or not the land or use thereof is exempt from taxation under s.13 of the Assessment Act. 3.3 Notwithstanding clause 3.2 above, this By-law shall not apply to lands that are owned by and used for the purposes of: (a) (b) the municipality or a local board thereof; or a board of education as defined in Section 1(1) of the Education Act. Approvals for Development 3.4 (a) Development charges shall be imposed on all lands, buildings or structures that are developed for residential or non-residential uses if the development requires: (i) the passing of a zoning by-law or of an amendment to a zoning bylaw under Section 34 of the Planning Act; (ii) the approval of a minor variance under Section 45 of the Planning Act; (iii) a conveyance of land to which a by-law passed under subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act applies; (iv) the approval of a plan of subdivision under Section 51 of the Planning Act; (v) a consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act; (vi) the approval of a description under Section 50 of the Condominium Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chap. C.26, as amended, or any successor thereof; or (vii) the issuing of a permit under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure. (b) No more than one development charge for each service designated in Section 2.1 shall be imposed upon any lands, buildings or structures to which this By-law applies, even though two or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a) are required before the lands, buildings or structures can be developed. (c) Despite subsection 3.4(b), if two or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a) occur at different times, additional development charges shall be imposed if the subsequent action has the effect of increasing the need for services. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

142 Page C-9 Exemptions 3.5 Notwithstanding the provisions of this By-law, development charges shall not be imposed with respect to: (a) (b) (c) an enlargement to a dwelling unit; one or two additional dwelling units in an existing single detached dwelling; or one additional dwelling unit in any other existing residential building. 3.6 Notwithstanding subsection 3.5(b), development charges shall be imposed if the total gross floor area of the additional one or two units exceeds the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit. 3.7 Notwithstanding Section 3.5(c), development charges shall be imposed if the additional unit has a gross floor area greater than (a) (b) in the case of a semi-detached or row dwelling, the gross floor area of the existing dwelling unit; and in the case of any other residential building, the gross floor area of the smallest dwelling unit contained in the residential building. 3.8 Exemption for Industrial Development: (a) (b) (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this By-law, no development charge is payable with respect to an enlargement of the gross floor area of an existing industrial building where the gross floor area is enlarged by 50 percent or less. If the gross floor area of an existing industrial building is enlarged by greater than 50 percent, the amount of the development charge payable in respect of the enlargement is the amount of the development charge that would otherwise be payable, multiplied by the fraction determined as follows: (i) determine the amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 percent of the gross floor area before the enlargement; (ii) divide the amount determined under subsection 3.8(a)(i) by the amount of the enlargement. For the purpose of Section 3.8 herein, existing industrial building is used as defined in the Regulation made pursuant to the Act. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

143 Page C Other Exemptions: Notwithstanding the provision of this By-law, development charges shall not be imposed with respect to: (a) (b) (c) The development of a non-residential farm building used for bona fide farm uses; A cemetery and burial ground exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act; and Development creating or adding an accessory use or structure not exceeding 10 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. Amount of Charges Residential 3.10 The development charges set out in Schedule B shall be imposed on residential uses of lands, buildings or structures, including a dwelling unit accessory to a non-residential use and, in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, on the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, according to the type of residential unit, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the type of residential use. Non-Residential 3.11 The development charges described in Schedule B to this By-law shall be imposed on non-residential uses of lands, buildings or structures and, in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, on the non-residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, and calculated with respect to each of the services according to the total floor area of the non-residential use. Reduction of Development Charges for Redevelopment 3.13 Despite any other provisions of this By-law, where, as a result of the redevelopment of land, a building or structure existing on the same land within 60 months (5 years) prior to the date of payment of development charges in regard to such redevelopment was or is to be demolished in whole or in part, or converted from one principal use to another principal use on the same land in order to facilitate the redevelopment, the development charges otherwise payable with respect to such redevelopment shall be reduced by the following amounts: Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

144 Page C-11 (a) (b) in the case of a residential building or structure, or in the case of a mixeduse building or structure, the residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charge under subsection 3.10 by the number, according to type, of dwelling units that have been or will be demolished or converted to another principal use; and in the case of a non-residential building or structure or, in the case of a mixed-use building or structure, the non-residential uses in the mixed-use building or structure, an amount calculated by multiplying the applicable development charges under Section 3.11, by the gross floor area that has been or will be demolished or converted to another principal use; provided that such amounts shall not exceed, in total, the amount of the development charges otherwise payable with respect to the redevelopment. Time of Payment of Development Charges 3.14 Development charges shall be calculated and payable in money or by provision of service as may be agreed upon, or by credit granted under the Act, on the date that the building permit is issued in relation to a building or structure on land to which the development charge applies Where development charges apply to land in relation to which a building permit is required, the building permit shall not be issued until the development charge has been paid in full This shall not be deemed to limit the authority of the Council to enter into an agreement for payment of the development charges before or after the date of building permit issuance subject to Section 27 of the Development Charges Act, Payment of Services 4.1 Despite the payment required under Sections 3.10 and 3.11, Council may, by agreement, give a credit towards a development charge in exchange for work that relates to a service to which a development charge relates under this By-law. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

145 Page C Indexing 5.1 Development charges imposed pursuant to this By-law shall be adjusted annually on the anniversary date of the By-law, without amendment to this By-law, in accordance with the prescribed index in the Act. 6. Front-end Financing 6.1 The Village may enter into front-end agreements with owners in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 7. Accountability 7.1 All monies paid pursuant to this By-law shall be maintained separately from all other revenues or receipts of the Village. The Treasurer of the Village shall establish separate reserve funds, pursuant to the categories of services designated in Section The Treasurer of the Village shall provide to the Council an annual financial statement related to this By-law and the development charge reserve funds established under Section 7.1 of this By-law. This annual statement shall be provided on a date directed by Council. 7.3 The Village shall pay interest on a refund under subsections 18(3), 18(5) and 25(2) or Section 36 of the Act at a rate equal to the Bank of Canada rate on the date this By-law comes into force, updated on the first business day of every January, April, July and October thereafter. 8. Schedules 8.1 The following schedules shall form part of this By-law: Schedule A Components of Services Designated in Section 2.1; Schedule B Schedule of Development Charges; and Schedule C Map of Municipal Wastewater Drainage Area. 9. Conflicts 9.1 Where the Village and an owner or former owner have entered into an agreement with respect to land within the area to which this By-law applies, and a conflict exists between the provisions of this By-law and such agreement, the provisions of the agreement shall prevail to the extent that there is a conflict. Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

146 Page C Notwithstanding Section 9.1, where a development which is the subject of an agreement to which Section 9.1 applies, is subsequently the subject of one or more of the actions described in subsection 3.4(a), an additional development charge in respect of the development permitted by the action shall be calculated, payable and collected in accordance with the provisions of this By-law if the development has the effect of increasing the need for services, unless such agreement provides otherwise. 10. Severability 10.1 If, for any reason, any provision of this By-law is held to be invalid, it is hereby declared to be the intention of Council that all the remainder of this By-law shall continue in full force and effect until repealed, re-enacted, amended or modified. 11. Date By-law In Force 11.1 This By-law shall come into effect at 12:01 AM on, Date By-law Expires 12.1 This By-law will expire at 12:01 AM on, 2023 unless it is repealed by Council at an earlier date. PASSED THIS day of, 2018 Mayor Conrad Lamadeleine Village Clerk Marielle Dupuis Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

147 Schedule A To By-law Components of Services Designated in Section % Eligible Services Water Services Page C-14 Wastewater Services Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

148 Page C-15 Schedule B To By-law Schedule of Development Charges Single and Semi- Detached Dwellings Residential Non-Residential Apartments - 2 Apartments - Bedrooms and Bachelor and 1 Larger Bedroom Other Multiples Per sq.mt. of GFA Service Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $5,858 $2,851 $2,627 $4,411 $18.90 Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $6, $2,993 $2,758 $4,631 $19.82 Water Services $2,342 $1,140 $1,050 $1,763 $6.88 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (Drainage Area 13) $8, $3,991 $3,677 $6,174 $25.77 Total - Water and Wastewater Services (excluding Drainage Area 13) $8,492 $4,133 $3,808 $6,394 $26.70 Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background

149 Page C-16 Schedule C To By-law Map of Municipal Wastewater Drainage Area Study.docx H:\Casselman\2017 Connection Charge DC\Casselman W-S Background