CUMMING. Firm Overview

Transcription

1 CUMMING Firm Overview Owner s Representatives Cumming has ranked in Engineering News Record Magazine s Top 40 listing of Top 50 CM-for-Fee Firms in the US; Top 4 of strictly Owner s Representatives. 20 Years Educational Facilities Experience Education portfolio accounts for more than $15 billion in construction and program management services for Education sector clients for large, complex capital building programs. Certified Sustainability and Energy Professionals multi-disciplined qualifications providing energy engineering services. Extensive Prop 39 Services including and energy efficiency and renewable energy projects development.

2 PROP 39 ENERGY EXPENDITURE PLANS Over $70 Million Prop 39 Funding Approvals from CEC ABC Unified SD Alhambra USD Anaheim Union HSD Baldwin Park USD Bellflower USD Beverly Hills USD Bowman Charter School Chaffey Joint Union HSD El Centro Elementary SD Fresno EOC Fullerton Joint UHSD Glendale USD Green Dot Public Schools Guajome (Charter) Schools Hanford Joint Union HSD Irvine USD La Canada USD Lake Elsinore USD Los Rios CCD Odyssey Charter School Orange County Dept of Ed Oxnard USD Palo Alto USD Pasadena USD Pond USD Placer County of Education San Bernardino City USD San Francisco USD Santa Ana USD Tustin USD Vacaville USD Val Verde USD Wasco Union High SD West Contra Costa USD

3 STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL CEC SUBMISSION 6-Step Prop 39 Methodology Vision for Implementation 1 Alignment on District Goals 5 Project Selection 6.Approved Energy Expenditure Plan 2 Benchmarking and O&M Interviews 4 EEM List Review 3 Energy Audits

4 STEP 1: DISTRICT GOALS Alignment on District Goals and Priorities Aged and Inefficient HVAC Equipment Lack of Integrated Energy Management System Insufficient Outlets and Safety Concerns Inefficient Lighting in Classrooms; Exterior Areas Poorly Lit Window and Storefront Energy Losses STEP 2: BENCHMARKING AND INTERVIEWS Baseline/Benchmark Analysis and Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Interviews with O&M Staff - identify site-specific maintenance priorities and building performance issues

5 STEP 3: ENERGY AUDITS ASHRAE Level II Audit Standards Level II Field Audits and Data Collection Potential Renewable Energy Opportunities Incorporate Utility Rebates and Incentives Energy Analysis and Modeling (HVAC) Review District Owned Vehicles Energy Cost Estimating Detailed Construction Level Estimates

6 STEP 4: REVIEW ENERGY MEASURES Total Site Projects Meet 1.01 Savings to Investment Ratio List of Eligible Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) Energy Savings (kwh, $) Simple Payback and SIR EEM Scope for Project Implementation EEM Numbe r EEM Description Energy Savings ($/Year ) Project Cost Rebates and Incentiv es Simple Paybac k (Years) Savings to Investme nt Ratio (SIR) EEM 1 Interior Lighting Retrofit $9,993 $135,74 2 $6, EEM 2 Exterior Lighting Retrofit $2,840 $11,702 $1, EEM 3 Lighting Controls $553 $5,597 $ EEM 4 Portable HVAC Replacement $400 EEM 5 Thermostatically Controlled Radiator Valves $344 $33,324 $22,

7 STEP 5: PROJECT SELECTION Available Prop 39 Funding Allocation Align EEM with District Goals and Priorities Selection of Projects Based on Need, Priorities, and Available Funding Development of Energy Audit Reports Completion of Draft Energy Expenditure Plan

8 STEP 6: CEC ENERGY EXPENDITURE PLAN 100% Energy Expenditure Plan Approvals for Prop 39 Clients

9 Val Verde Unified School District Energy Efficiency and Generation Support CASE STUDY 1 Val Verde, CA Energy Audits Performed ASHRAE Level I and II Audits Approved for $4.2M Prop 39 Funding for Energy Efficiency Projects Summer Schools Lighting Projects Annual Energy and Maintenance Savings of $279,208 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 Annual Utility Cost Avoidance- 20 Years Solar PPA Battery Storage Solar Feasibility Study at 23 Sites 7.01 MW Carport Solar PV 2,400 kw Battery Storage at 23 Sites Manager RFQ/RFP for 8 Firms, Shortlist, and BAFO/PPA Negotiations Install Date: June 2016 Cumulative Savings (20 Years) $26,208,249 Development of Green Fund Address Deferred Maintenance $1,000,000 $500,000 $

10 TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Prop 39 Energy Services: Lighting and HVAC Project Installation CASE STUDY 2 Tustin, CA Energy Audits Performed ASHRAE Level II Audits Approved for $4.6M Prop 39 Funding for Energy Efficiency Projects FY 2017 Lighting at (23) sites. HVAC Projects at (4) sites Construction Implementation Completed Construction projects consist of $3.5M of complete site Lighting Projects at (2) sites, Exterior lighting at (23) sites, Cool Roof and Boilers at (1) site, and HVAC upgrades are (7) sites. Estimated savings across all projects are $420K

11 ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL Prop 39 System Design & Energy Services: Lighting and HVAC Project Installation CASE STUDY 3 Altadena, CA Energy Audits Performed ASHRAE Level II Audits Approved for $244K Prop 39 Funding for Energy Efficiency Projects (Cost estimates at $490K for complete project) System Design Facility constructed in 1950 s. Abandoned for 20 years until Charter took over in Facility ripe for system upgrades Separate Lighting + HVAC into separate electrical systems HVAC system increased from window units to split system for better cooling and air distribution Lighting system upgrade to LED with use of integrated controls for more customized use.

12 El Centro Unified School District Prop 39 Energy Services and Facilities Needs Assessment/Master Plan Support CASE STUDY 4 El Centro, CA Energy Services Performed ASHRAE Level I and II Audits Approved for $1.2M Prop 39 Funding for Energy Efficiency Projects Summer Lighting Projects Annual Energy and Maintenance Savings of $373,000 Facilities Condition Assessments and Master Plan - 21 Sites Detailed Site Visits necessary due to the variety of campus styles, buildings age and different renovation/maintenance histories Detailed Campus Reports itemize existing condition, rank needs, recommend priorities, and provide cost estimates or all areas Install Identified approximately $117.2 million in costs to modernize the facilities

13 FUNDING STRATEGIES Outside Sources to Leverage Prop 39 Dollars Utility Incentives- Cover s between 5-15% of project costs CREBS (Clean Renewable Energy Bonds) Leverage District Bond Dollars Prop 39 0% Interest Loans