#CertifHy. Creating the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen. Stakeholder Platform 1 st Plenary Session. Wouter Vanhoudt Hinicio

Transcription

1 CertifHy Creating the 1st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen Wouter Vanhoudt Hinicio Project supported by the FCH JU Stakeholder Platform 1 st Plenary Session Monday 0th November #CertifHy

2 Content 1. Introduction. CertifHy Phase 1: Developing the 1 st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin scheme for Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen (01-016) 3. CertifHy Phase : Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen by establishing a Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot Operation ( /019) 1. Project overview. Key aspects of the pilot 3. Stakeholder Platform operating principle. Stakeholder body roles and compositions 5. Working Group, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform role in the project 6. Working group compositions. Q&A

3 A Guarantee of Origin (GO) guarantees the origin of a product and provides information to customers on the source of their products Renewable electricity GO scheme Sustainable Palm Oil GO scheme Source: 3

4 Who are we? The CertifHy project team CertifHy phase 1 & Project leader Independent strategy consulting firm specialized in sustainable energy and transport with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells. The Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) is a leading independent European institute for applied energy technology development, energy research, and policy advice. LBST is an expert consultancy for sustainable energy and mobility founded with a European competence centre on hydrogen and fuel cells with one of the longest track-records. TÜV SÜD is one of the world s leading technical service providers of testing, inspection, certification and training solutions with the strategic business segments INDUSTRY, MOBILITY and CERTIFICATION. CertifHy phase Grexel is the leading European energy certification service provider

5 CertifHy aims to develop the 1 st European-wide Green and Low Carbon hydrogen GO scheme /9 00s.. Phase 1 Phase Phase 3 1 Define a widely acceptable definition of green hydrogen 1 Set-up a hydrogen GO Stakeholders platform & its Steering Group 1 Prepare EU wide deployment: Implement key elements Competent authority, Finalise the scheme design ensuring it can be the main route to guarantee the origin of green & low carbon hydrogen across EU MS Issuing Body, Registry operator, Accreditation body Determine how an EU wide robust GO scheme should be designed and implemented 3 Run a pilot scheme to test the proposed design. Identify actions which need to be undertaken after the completion of the study to achieve an EU wide deployment of the scheme Finalise Regulation, Codes and Standards: CEN Standard EU and national regulation EECS for green H 5

6 Low-carbon Not Low-carbon Stakeholders across industry have agreed on a common European definition of Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen CertifHy Green H CertifHy Low Carbon H Carbon intensity* limit Renewable energy Non renewable energy * Greenhouse gas emissions (CO equivalent) per unit of hydrogen over whole generation pathway up to marketable product 6

7 The definition of green hydrogen was widely endorsed by stakeholders 7

8 Hydrogen GOs cover the whole generation pathway up to marketable product Out of scope H product: 99% & 30 bar Production device Storage Out of scope CertifHy scope Transport Power-to-Gas Power-to-Power Power-to-Mobility Power-to-Chemical 8

9 Renewable hydrogen will be as green as the energy input into the production device Biomass input 0 GJ Electricity input 10 GJ Renewable *: 0 GJ Non-renewable: 7 GJ Renewable *: 3 GJ Hydrogen production Non-renewable: 7 GJ Total energy input : 30 GJ 3% Non-renewable H 3% Renewable H 77% Renewable: 3 GJ 77% * Via GO or direct feedstock 9

10 GO Market GO use cases to ensure that a mobility application is Green 1 H supplier GO account H H H HRS operator GO account HRS operator GO account H H H H H On-site production H Fleet operator GO account 3 H H Vehicle OEM GO account H H 10

11 Content 1. CertifHy Phase 1: Developing the 1 st EU-wide Guarantee of Origin scheme for Green and Low Carbon Hydrogen (01-016). CertifHy Phase : Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen by establishing a Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot Operation ( /019) 1. Project overview. Key aspects of the pilot 3. Stakeholder Platform operating principle. Stakeholder body roles and compositions 5. Working Group, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform role in the project 6. Working group compositions 3. Q&A 11

12 Platform The scheme will be developed in interaction with Stakeholder Working Groups for consultation and approval Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun M1 + WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform Platform creation Platform operation Steering Group WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures + 6 months if needed Platform operational WG : GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework WP: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot Preliminary scheme definition - incl. interaction with standards and regulation Pilot specification Preliminary GO scheme defined WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback Pilot scheme tested Stakeholder group Pilot preparation - Scheme procedures - ICT system - Production site audits - Monitoring plan Pilot operation - Registry operation - GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback - Cost analysis and business model GO scheme finalized EU roll out plan adopted Milestone Pilot online WP: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan Updating of GO scheme Plan for EU rollout 1

13 Composition Role Stakeholder platform entities role and composition Stakeholder Platform WG1: GO scheme and procedures WG: GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework Steering Group Act as a discussion fora for stakeholder Endorse the overall scheme Define the scheme Provide input to and interface with standardisation with regards to structure and content Define the requirements that will apply to the H production sites Specify the features that are needed to address market needs in terms of GO product and commercialisation Ensure alignment between GO scheme and the pertinent regulation, especially at EU level Take decisions regarding platform governance & organisation Endorse the important scheme decisions Convene Plenary Sessions All pertinent stakeholders GO scheme experts (including industry) Standardisation experts Operators of H production sites All actors involved with the distribution and use of GOs (fleet operators, industrials from the automotive, steel, glass, etc sectors, industrial gas companies ) Public affairs experts of the stakeholder group Representatives of the Commission Working Group Chairs and Co-chair European institutions (DG Energy, DG Clima, DG Move, DG Environment, FCH JU) 13

14 The pilot scheme Key elements of the GO scheme procedures will be tested The Stakeholder Platform is expected to become the competent authority, in due time. TÜV SÜD will audit pilot hydrogen production sites & verify production batches. GREXEL will adapt an existing GO registry. GREXEL will issue and allow for trading of the associated GOs. Final customers will purchase the GOs. 1

15 Support by Secretariat Stakeholder platform Operating principles Consultation Feedback and/or endorsement Presentation of results to Steering Group 1 3 Steering Group Feedback and endorsement 5 Presentation to Stakeholder Platform 6 Stakeholder Platform feedback and endorsement Steering Group 5 6 Stakeholder Platform WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures WG : GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO Commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework Project team 15

16 Overview of work plan and interactions with the WGs Plenary session + 6 months if needed M1 M M3 M M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M1 Preliminary GO scheme Pilot specification WG1: Input to general scheme design WG3: User requirements WG: Input for pilot specification Pilot specification Feedback from plenary Standard scheme documents & implementation plan Endorsement by WG1 Recommendations wrt to feasibility/practicality by WG Pilot preparation WG1: input on scheme procedures WG&3: Adhoc input Scheme procedures Feedback from WG Endorsement by WG1 Pilot monitoring plan Endorsement by WG & by WG3 Pilot operation Pilot online WG1&: Input to pilot evaluation Input to cost model Cost & Business model Endorsement by WG Pilot results Endorsement by WG & WG3 Updating of GO scheme Planning for EU rollout WG, WG3, WG: recommendations for updated GO scheme WG1: input to update of GO Standard scheme documents Endorsement by WG1, Steering Group, Stakeholder Platform EU rollout plan Endorsement by Stakeholder Platform 16

17 WG1 GO scheme and procedures Working group composition WG1 Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide Utilities EDF, Engie, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Uniper, Verbund Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Industry Oil&Gas Other operators Equipment manufacturers Automotive Shell Colruyt Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe Daimler GO Scheme experts Standardisation experts Associations Regulators Research organisations Consultancies AGCS, AIB, I-REC Standard, Energinet, Vertogas NEN HNL VREG European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), Groupe Européen de Recherche sur le Gaz (GERG), NREL Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting, Patch LLTD 17

18 WG GO issuing Working group composition WG Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Utilities Industry Oil&Gas Other operators Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde Bischoff & Ditze Energy GmbH, CNR, Enertrag, Engie, Electrabel, Enovos, HYGRO, Uniper Please adapt as you see fit OMV, Q8 Colruyt, Group Machiels, HYOP, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Equipment manufacturers Chemicals Standardisation experts Cities / Regions Associations Research Organisations Consultancies Other FLD Technologies, Hygear, ITM Power, NEL, Hydrogen Technologies d.o.o Akzo Nobel H&R GmbH Aberdeen city council Wind Europe EMEC, European Gas Research Group (GERG), ICSI Rm. Valcea, University of Valladolid, Japan Petroleum Energy Center, NREL Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting METI 18

19 WG3 GO Commercialisation and use Working group composition WG3 Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Industry Fleet operators Cities/Regions Industrial gas Utilities O&G Other operators Equipment manufacturer Automotive Air Products, Air Liquide, Linde Bischoff & Ditze Energy, EnerTrag, Engie, Engie Electrabel, Enovos, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Verbund Q8, Shell Colruyt, Group Machiels, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch Solenco Power, Hydrogen Technologies d.o.o Daimler, Toyota Motor Europe PitPoint Aberdeen City Council Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Associations GO scheme experts Research organisations Consultancies Other European Hydrogen Association (EHA), HyER, NOW, WaterstofNet AIB, RECS International EMEC, Japan Petroleum Energy Centre, Mizuho information and research institute Ecofys, EEI, Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting METI 19

20 WG Regulatory framework Working group composition WG Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Industrial gasses Air Liquide, Linde Utility EDF, Engie Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Industry Associations O&G Equipment manufacturers Industry associations Other operators Shell, OMV FLD Technologies, Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power System Europe Wind Europe Colruyt HNL, Hydrogen Europe, NOW, WaterstofNet GO scheme experts Standardisation experts Research organisations Consultancies CEN, ICSI Rm. Valcea, NEN AIB, H&R, RECS International Bilbao Faculty of engineering, GERG, EMEC Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting 0

21 Q&A Q&A 1

22 CertifHy Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen by establishing a Stakeholder Platform and a Pilot Operations WG1 Project supported by the FCH JU Consortium Working document 0/11/017

23 WG1 morning 1 hour work session agenda How to start? 1. Welcome (WG1 coordinator: Matthias Altmann). WG1 member presentation round: name, affiliation, motivation & expertise (all) 3. Presentation of (co)chair candidates (Guy de Réals, Phil Moody). WG1 work programme and timeline (Matthias) 5. Election of (co)chair during lunch break (all WG1 members)

24 WG1 GO scheme and procedures Working group composition WG1 Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide Utilities EDF, Engie, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Uniper, Verbund Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Industry Oil&Gas Other operators Equipment manufacturers Automotive Shell Colruyt Hydrogenics, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Europe Daimler GO Scheme experts Standardisation experts Regulators Associations Research organisations Consultancies AGCS, AIB, I-REC Standard, Energinet, Vertogas NEN VREG HNL European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC), Groupe Européen de Recherche sur le Gaz (GERG), NREL Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting, Keith Patch

25 Working group election rules Each working group member may can vote once for 1 chair and 1 cochair. Each vote for a candidate for the «chair» position gives him votes. Each vote for a candidate for the «co-chair» position gives him 1 vote. The candidate with the most votes is the default working group chair. The candidate with the nd most votes is the default working group cochair. Once elected, the chair and co-chair may exchange their positions upon mutual consent. This can only be done once.

26 Composition Role Updated WG role and composition Stakeholder Platform WG1: GO scheme and procedures WG: GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework Steering Group Act as a discussion fora for stakeholder Validate the overall scheme Define the scheme and procedures Provide input to and interface with standardisation with regards to structure and content Define the requirements that will apply to the H production sites Specify the features that are needed to address market needs in terms of GO product and commercialisation Ensure alignment between GO scheme and the pertinent regulation, especially at EU level Take decisions regarding platform governance & organisation Validate the important scheme decisions Convene Plenary Sessions All pertinent stakeholders GO scheme experts (including industry) Standardisation experts Operators of H production sites All actors involved with the distribution and use of GOs (fleet operators, industrials from the automotive, steel, glass, etc sectors, industrial gas companies ) Public affairs experts of the stakeholder group Representatives of the Commission Working Group Chairs and Co-chair European institutions (DG Energy, DG Clima, DG Move, DG Environment, FCH JU) 5

27 WG1: GO Scheme & Procedures - Work programme Task Objectives Key questions Outputs Definition of a preliminary GO scheme Definition of a preliminary GO scheme laid down in the standard scheme documents What is already available from CertifHy documents (D., D3.1, D3., D.1, D., D5.1)? How to use other established schemes and standards (notably EECS)? Preliminary scheme design documents in (Month ) Draft strategy for scheme implementation Standardization Leveraging of the European standardisation framework for supporting adoption of the CertifHy scheme Which standardization frameworks are important (notably CEN/CENELEC)? How should the existing standards framework be expanded or modified to include H GOs? Are there any conflicts or barriers that need to be overcome? Interaction with regulatory aspects (WG)? Proposed way forward for having the H GO scheme covered by a CEN standard (Month ) Proposed content Definition of preliminary procedures Developing all necessary procedures for the GO scheme and to define on this basis the procedure for the pilot system Rely on available CertifHy documents (D., D3.1, D3., D.1, D., D5.1) Preparation and auditing of plants, verification of production batches, registry operation, Issuing Body procedures over the full life cycle of a GO, complaints handling and resolution Adaptation to hydrogen from other established schemes (notably EECS)? Reduced scope for pilot procedures Detailed reference procedure documents (Month 5) Pilot procedures (reduced scope) Update of GO scheme & procedures Final design of the GO scheme, standard scheme and reference procedure documents, ready for implementation Update based on experiences and feedback from the pilots Endorsement of standard scheme documents and reference procedure documents by WG1, Steering Group and Stakeholder Platform First complete set of standard scheme documents & reference procedure 6 documents (Month 10/1)

28 WG1: GO Scheme & Procedures - Timeline Due date documents Meetings / Plenary Webinars + 6 months if needed M1 M M3 M M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M1 Preliminary GO scheme - CertifHy deliverables - Other schemes Interface - task./.3 (standards & regulations) Standard scheme documents (M) - Strategy for implementation (M) > Endorsement by WG1 Standardization - Standardization frameworks - Participation CEN TC6 / (ErGar)? - Contact with standardization bodies Interface - Task.1 - Way forward for having H GOs covered by a CEN standard > Endorsement by WG1 - Proposed content for CEN standard > Endorsement by WG1 Preliminary procedures Update of GO scheme & procedures - Based on task.1 - CertifHy deliverables - Other schemes Interface - task 3.., 3..3, 3.3.1, 3.3. (Registry, pilot site certification, production batch verification Procedures (M5) > Endorsement by WG1 - Adjust documents based on feedback from WG & WG3 & pilots Interface - task 3.3 (pilots) Standard scheme & reference procedure documents (M10) - Endorsement by WG1 7 - Endorsement by Stakeholder Platform

29 Tasks & WG roles (1/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Defining a preliminary GO scheme Interacting with the regulatory frameworks Interacting with other standardisation frameworks Pilot specification 1.Inputs to the GO preliminary scheme design.endorses the GO preliminary scheme design Endorses approach for strategic leverage of standardisation and interfaces with the relevant standardisation groups 1.Consulted on the GO preliminary scheme design wrt practical feasibility..recommendations wrt to practical feasibility. Endorses the pilot specifications from a producer perspective Inputs to the preliminary GO Scheme wrt user functional requirements Endorses the pilot specification from a user perspective Consulted to ensure that the GO preliminary scheme design compatible with EU regulation Identifies show stoppers and barriers in EU regulation Addresses the need to amend EU legislation 1.Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design.submits to Stakeholder Platform Endorses the Pilot specifications Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design 8

30 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Managing the pilot set-up and operation Pilot preparation Defining the pilot scheme procedures Designing and setting up the ICT System Production site audits Defining the pilot monitoring and feedback collection plan 1.Inputs to scheme procedures.endorses scheme procedures Inputs scheme procedures wrt practical feasibility Inputs on what should be monitored Informed on the pilot procedures Inputs on what should be monitored Stakeholder Platform 9

31 Tasks & WG roles (3/) Pilot operation Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Informed of pilot operation advances Stakeholder Platform Registry operation Production batch certification Pilot monitoring Input to analysis of pilot results from the producer s perspective for identification of lessons learned Inputs to analysis of pilot results from the users perspective for identification of lessons learned Cost analysis & business models Validate cost inputs Recommend and provide feedback on proposed business models Informed of pilot results & business cases Endorses the pilot results Endorses pilot results & business cases 10

32 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Updating the GO scheme & preparing the documentation Preparing EU rollout 1.Updates GO scheme based upon pilot results and WG and WG3 recommendations.endorses the GO scheme Inputs to the rollout plan Endorses/Comments EU rollout plan 1.Provides recommendations to WG1.Comments the GO scheme wrt practical feasibility. 1.Inputs to the rollout plan.endorses/comments EU rollout plan 1.Provides recommendations to WG1.Comments the GO scheme wrt functional requirements 1.Inputs to the rollout plan.endorses/comments EU rollout plan Reviews regulatory alignment of the final scheme Validates proposed regulatory amendments required for EU-wide rollout Steering Group 1.Endorses the GO scheme.submits the GO scheme to the Stakeholder Platform 1.Endorses the roadmap for EU rollout.submits the roadmap for EU roll-out to Stakeholder Platform Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO scheme Endorses the roadmap for EU roll-out 11

33 WG1 afternoon 1 hour work session agenda How to start? 1. Expectation of WG1 members?. CertifHy GO scheme development: What is EECS? Approach to synergies of CertifHy with EECS? How can CertifHy benefit from and collaborate with EECS? 3. CertifHy GO scheme alignment with standards: What is CEN/CENELEC TC6 WG Hydrogen GO, how is it working? Approach to synergies of CertifHy with CEN? How can CertifHy benefit from and collaborate with CEN?. Interplay and alignment between EECS (scheme) and standard? 5. CertifHy approach to procedures? 6. Next steps 1

34 CertifHy Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen Project supported by the FCH JU Working Group Session 0/11/017 Frederic Barth - Hinicio

35 Agenda

36 WG GO issuing Working group composition WG Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Utilities Industry Oil&Gas Other operators Industrial gas suppliers Air Liquide, Air Products, Linde Bischoff & Ditze Energy GmbH, CNR, Enertrag, Engie, Electrabel, Enovos, HYGRO, Uniper Please adapt as you see fit OMV, Q8 Colruyt, Group Machiels, HYOP, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Equipment manufacturers Chemicals Standardisation experts Cities / Regions Associations Research Organisations Consultancies Other FLD Technologies, Hygear, ITM Power, NEL, Hydrogen Technologies Akzo Nobel H&R GmbH Aberdeen city council, Wind Europe EMEC, European Gas Research Group (GERG), ICSI Rm. Valcea, University of Valladolid, Japan Petroleum Energy Center, NREL Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting METI 3

37 Project supported by the FCH JU WG Work Programme

38 Platform The scheme will be developed in interaction with stakeholder WGs for consultation and approval Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun M1 + WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform Platform creation Platform operation Steering Group WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures + 6 months if needed Platform operational WG : GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework WP: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot Preliminary scheme definition - incl. interaction with standards and regulation Pilot specification Preliminary GO scheme defined WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback Pilot scheme tested Stakeholder group Pilot preparation - Scheme procedures - ICT system - Production site audits - Monitoring plan Pilot operation - Registry operation - GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback - Cost analysis and business model GO scheme finalized EU roll out plan adopted Milestone Pilot online WP: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan Updating of GO scheme Plan for EU rollout 5

39 Composition Role Stakeholder platform entities role and composition Stakeholder Platform WG1: GO scheme and procedures WG: GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework Steering Group Act as a discussion fora for stakeholder Endorse the overall scheme Define the scheme Provide input to and interface with standardisation with regards to structure and content Define the requirements that will apply to the H production sites Specify the features that are needed to address market needs in terms of GO product and commercialisation Identify regulatory barriers and ensure alignment between GO scheme and the pertinent regulation, especially at EU level Take decisions regarding platform governance & organisation Endorse the important scheme decisions Convene Plenary Sessions All pertinent stakeholders GO scheme experts (including industry) Standardisation experts Operators of H production sites All actors involved with the distribution and use of GOs (fleet operators, industrials from the automotive, steel, glass, etc sectors, industrial gas companies ) Public affairs experts of the stakeholder group Representatives of the Commission Working Group Chairs and Co-chair European institutions (DG Energy, DG Clima, DG Move, DG Environment, FCH JU) 6

40 WG: GO issuing - Work programme Task Objectives Key questions Outputs Definition of a preliminary GO scheme Define how Plant and Product certification criteria will be practically implemented How is the perimeter of the production device defined? How do we measure and collect the data required for plant certification and batch certification? Is all the information required to be included in the GO disclosable? Scheme appendix: Practical ways of measuring and processing the data required (incl. H from chloralkali electrolysis) Pilot specification Define the pilot production devices, Forecast amount & cost of GOs per type and site What is the perimeter of the pilot production devices? Estimated quantity & cost of GOs that could be made available Will the data required for pilot scheme operation be available? Data needs for the different ways of addressing the res. mix issue Pilot specification document: - Pilot sites definition - GO quantity forecast - Methods for addressing res. mix. Scheme procedures Optimise scheme procedures and validate their feasibility Are the defined scheme procedures feasible and optimal? How should they be adapted for the pilot? MoM on feasibility and optimisation of preliminary procedures Pilot monitoring plan Input on what needs to be monitored and on how to collect the data What are the scheme evaluation criteria? What data and events do we need to record for evaluating the scheme? Pilot monitoring plan - data to be collected with regards to GO issuing Pilot monitoring Contribute to analysis of pilot results for identification of lessons learned What did we learn from the pilot phase? What issues remain to be addressed? Pilot evaluation report Business models Contribute to costs and business model analysis Are the cost inputs correct? Which business models are the most realistic and attractive? MoM on business models Update of GO scheme Provide recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures What are the proposed changes? Recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures 7

41 Criteria (i) on past production and (ii) on production batch for issuing CertifHy GOs H Production Grey H < 91 g CO /MJ H? H with Green GO H with LC GO (i) Average GHG intensity since t -1 months of Non-CertifHy H must not exceed 91 g CO /MJ H 1 months Past Production Production Batch t 1 mths t 1 t Time (ii) Average GHG intensity of H covered by a CertifHy GO Non-renewable share < 36.5 must not exceed 36. g CO /MJ H g CO /MJ H? CertifHy Low Carbon H GOs g CO /MJ H? Renewable share CertifHy Green H GOs 8

42 Overview of work plan and interactions with the WGs Plenary session + 6 months if needed Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Apr 18 May 18 June 18 Dec 18 Jan 19 Feb 19 Preliminary GO scheme Pilot specification WG1: Input to general scheme design WG3: User requirements WG: Input for pilot specification Pilot specification Feedback from plenary Standard scheme documents & implementation plan Endorsement by WG1 Recommendations wrt to feasibility/practicality by WG Pilot preparation WG1: input on scheme procedures WG&3: Adhoc input Scheme procedures Feedback from WG Endorsement by WG1 Pilot monitoring plan Endorsement by WG & by WG3 Pilot operation Pilot online WG1&: Input to pilot evaluation Input to cost model Cost & Business model Endorsement by WG Pilot results Endorsement by WG & WG3 Updating of GO scheme Planning for EU rollout WG, WG3, WG: recommendations for updated GO scheme WG1: input to update of GO Standard scheme documents Endorsement by WG1, Steering Group, Stakeholder Platform EU rollout plan Endorsement by Stakeholder Platform 9

43 Tasks & WG roles (1/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Defining a preliminary GO scheme Interacting with the regulatory frameworks Interacting with other standardisation frameworks Pilot specification 1. Inputs to the GO preliminary scheme design. Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design Endorses approach for strategic leverage of standardisation and interfaces with the relevant standardisation groups 1. Consulted on the GO preliminary scheme design wrt practical feasibility.. Recommendations wrt to practical feasibility. Endorses the pilot specifications from a producer perspective Inputs to the preliminary GO Scheme wrt user functional requirements Endorses the pilot specification from a user perspective Consulted to ensure that the GO preliminary scheme design compatible with EU regulation Identifies show stoppers and barriers in EU regulation Addresses the need to amend EU legislation 1. Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design. Submits to Stakeholder Platform Endorses the Pilot specifications Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design 10

44 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Managing the pilot set-up and operation Pilot preparation Defining the pilot scheme procedures Designing and setting up the ICT System Production site audits Defining the pilot monitoring and feedback collection plan 1. Inputs to scheme procedures. Endorses scheme procedures Inputs scheme procedures wrt practical feasibility Inputs on what should be monitored Informed on the pilot procedures Inputs on what should be monitored Stakeholder Platform 11

45 Tasks & WG roles (3/) Pilot operation Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Informed of pilot operation advances Stakeholder Platform Registry operation Production batch certification Pilot monitoring Input to analysis of pilot results from the producer s perspective for identification of lessons learned Inputs to analysis of pilot results from the users perspective for identification of lessons learned Cost analysis & business models Validate cost inputs Recommend and provide feedback on proposed business models Informed of pilot results & business cases Endorses the pilot results Endorses pilot results & business cases 1

46 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Updating the GO scheme & preparing the documentation Preparing EU rollout 1. Updates GO scheme based upon pilot results and WG and WG3 recommendations. Endorses the GO scheme Inputs to the rollout plan Endorses/Comments EU rollout plan 1. Provides recommendations to WG1. Comments the GO scheme wrt practical feasibility. 1. Inputs to the rollout plan. Endorses/Commen ts EU rollout plan 1. Provides recommendations to WG1. Comments the GO scheme wrt functional requirements 1. Inputs to the rollout plan. Endorses/comment s EU rollout plan Reviews regulatory alignment of the final scheme Validates proposed regulatory amendments required for EU-wide rollout Steering Group 1. Endorses the GO scheme. Submits the GO scheme to the Stakeholder Platform 1. Endorses the roadmap for EU roll-out. Submits the roadmap for EU roll-out to Stakeholder Platform Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO scheme Endorses the roadmap for EU roll-out 13

47 WG: GO issuing - Timeline Due date documents Meetings / Plenary Webinars + 6 months if needed Oct M1 17 Nov M 17 Dec M3 17 Jan M 18 Feb M5 18 Mar M6 18 Apr M7 18 May M8 18 June M9 18 Dec 18 M10 Jan M11 19 Feb M1 19 Preliminary GO scheme CertifHy deliv. Doc. on practical implementation of certification criteria Prelim. scheme (WG1) > Recommandations wrt to feasibility/practicality by WG Pilot specification Producer input Pilot specification > Feedback from plenary Preliminary procedures Monitoring plan CertifHy deliv. Monitoring plan > Endorsement by WG Prelim proced. (WG1) > Recommendations by WG wrt to feasibility and practicality Adhoc meetings Pilot monitoring Business models Pilot online Periodic review of pilot results Prelim study of business models Cost and bus. model > Endorsed by WG Pilot operation results > Endorsed by WG Updating of GO scheme Recommended changes to scheme and procedures 1

48 Project supported by the FCH JU WG Chair an Co-chair election

49 Project supported by the FCH JU WG & WG3 joint work session

50 Project supported by the FCH JU Essential requirements for determining H quantity, carbon intensity, and renewable share

51 Project supported by the FCH JU Residual mix & Use of GOs with hydrogen from non-participating sources

52 GO trading creates an undetermined residual mix for all consumers using hydrogen without a GO No GO Scheme CertifHy GO Scheme Use of green / low carbon H is restricted to vicinity of low carbon source Any user can request to be informed by the supplier of the carbon intensity of the supplied H Label stimulates demand for H from low carbon / renewable sources Green/Low Carbon H can be provided to any user supplied from a participating source However, the carbon intensity of all non-certifhy H becomes undetermined / that of the residual mix. Nonetheless, plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity n H source n H consumer from source n High carbon Benchmark Renewable and low carbon Undetermined residual mix Participating to CertifHy scheme CertifHy Green H Group of consumers supplied from sources participating to CertifHy scheme 19

53 GO trading with application of GOs to hydrogen from non-participating sources can lead to a loss of accountability for the supply/use of high carbon H CertifHy GO Scheme with application of GOs to H from participating sources only CertifHy GO Scheme with application of GOs to H from non-participating sources Plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity However, part of the market is excluded Applying conditions on the physical supply of hydrogen for using GOs generates an administrative burden Increases demand for H from LC / renewable sources However, accountability for the supply/use of high carbon hydrogen is lost ; supply continues without any user having to accept the high carbon intensity any longer The carbon intensity of the hydrogen supplied without a GO (residual mix) is increased, although not visibly due to dilution n H source n H consumer from source n High carbon Benchmark Renewable and low carbon Undetermined residual mix Participating to CertifHy scheme CertifHy Green H Group of consumers supplied from sources participating to CertifHy scheme 0

54 Information to be collected for evaluating residual mix approaches Option Evaluation criteria 1: No consideration of physical supply : Physical supplier must also be part of the GO scheme 3: Physical supplier from a non-participating source must provide GHG intensity :? Credibility Market study: H market volume fraction supplied from high carbon sources? Projected evolution? Inclusiveness Pilot: - Identification of GO pilot users supplied from a non participating source - Carbon intensity of that physical supply Market study: - H market volume fraction supplied from high carbon sources? - Projected evolution? Administrative burden Burden of - identifying source of physical supply? - applying condition on source of physical supply? Burden of - obtaining source of physical supply? - providing GHG intensity of greened H physical supplied from a non participating source? - processing of this GHG intensity data

55 Project supported by the FCH JU Discussion of GO use cases

56 GO Market GO use cases for providing that a mobility application is green or low carbon 1 H supplier GO account H H H HRS operator GO account HRS operator GO account H H H H H On-site production H Fleet operator GO account 3 H H Vehicle OEM GO account H H 3

57 CertifHy Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen Project supported by the FCH JU Working Group 3 Session 0/11/017 Wouter Vanhoudt- Hinicio

58 Agenda

59 WG3 GO Commercialisation and use Working group composition WG3 Members Category Sub-category Stakeholders Industry Fleet operators Cities/Regions Associations Industrial gas Utilities O&G GO scheme experts Other operators Equipment manufacturer Automotive Air Products, Air Liquide, Linde Bischoff & Ditze Energy, EnerTrag, Engie, Engie Electrabel, Enovos, HYGRO, Statkraft Markets, Verbund Q8, Shell Colruyt, Group Machiels, Wind to Gas SüderMarsch Solenco Power, Hydrogen Technologies d.o.o Daimler, Toyota Motor Europe PitPoint Aberdeen City Council H Mobility FR, WaterstofNet, European Hydrogen Association (EHA), HyER, NOW AIB, RECS International Legend Member Chair/co-chair candidate Observer Research organisations Consultancies Other EMEC, Japan Petroleum Energy Centre Ecofys, EEI, Deloitte Tohmatsu Consulting METI

60 Project supported by the FCH JU WG3 Work Programme

61 Platform The scheme will be developed in interaction with stakeholder WGs for consultation and approval Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun M1 + WP1: The creation and operation of a stakeholders platform Platform creation Platform operation Steering Group WG 1: GO Scheme and procedures + 6 months if needed Platform operational WG : GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework WP: Preliminary scheme finalization & Specification of pilot Preliminary scheme definition - incl. interaction with standards and regulation Pilot specification Preliminary GO scheme defined WP3: Pilot scheme development, operation and feedback Pilot scheme tested Stakeholder group Pilot preparation - Scheme procedures - ICT system - Production site audits - Monitoring plan Pilot operation - Registry operation - GO issuing and use - Pilot monitoring and stakeholder feedback - Cost analysis and business model GO scheme finalized EU roll out plan adopted Milestone Pilot online WP: Final GO scheme design & EU-wide implementation plan Updating of GO scheme Plan for EU rollout 5

62 Composition Role Stakeholder platform entities role and composition Stakeholder Platform WG1: GO scheme and procedures WG: GO issuing (Producers) WG 3: GO commercialisation and use (Users) WG : Regulatory framework Steering Group Act as a discussion fora for stakeholder Endorse the overall scheme Define the scheme Provide input to and interface with standardisation with regards to structure and content Define the requirements that will apply to the H production sites Specify the features that are needed to address market needs in terms of GO product and commercialisation Ensure alignment between GO scheme and the pertinent regulation, especially at EU level Take decisions regarding platform governance & organisation Endorse the important scheme decisions Convene Plenary Sessions All pertinent stakeholders GO scheme experts (including industry) Standardisation experts Operators of H production sites All actors involved with the distribution and use of GOs (fleet operators, industrials from the automotive, steel, glass, etc sectors, industrial gas companies ) Public affairs experts of the stakeholder group Representatives of the Commission Working Group Chairs and Co-chair European institutions (DG Energy, DG Clima, DG Move, DG Environment, FCH JU) 6

63 WG3: GO commercialisation & use - Work programme Task Objectives Key questions Outputs Definition of a preliminary GO scheme Provide a GO user perspective on the scheme requirements What are the different types of actors that will use GOs? How should GOs be made available? What information should be accessible to GO users and to H end-users? By what means? Expression of needs from user perspective Pilot specification Define user aspects which will be tested with the pilot What are the use configurations and user features that should be implemented in pilot phase? Who will be pilot GO users? For addressing the res. mix issue: are users able to get information on the GHG intensity of their current supply of H? Description of Pilot user configuration Scheme procedures Validate practicality of procedures on user side Are the defined scheme procedures on the user side practical and user friendly? MoM on practicality of scheme and pilot procedures Pilot monitoring plan Input on what needs to be monitored and on how to collect the data What are the scheme evaluation criteria? What data and events do we need to record for evaluating the scheme? Pilot monitoring plan - data to be collected with regards to GO use Pilot monitoring Contribute to analysis of pilot results for identification of lessons learned What did we learn from the pilot phase? What issues remain to be addressed? Pilot evaluation report Business models Contribute to costs and business model analysis Are the cost inputs correct? Which business models are the most realistic and attractive? MoM on business models Update of GO scheme Provide recommendations for update of GO scheme and procedures What are the proposed changes? WG3 recommendations 7

64 WG3: GO commercialisation & use - Timeline Due date documents Meetings / Plenary Webinars + 6 months if needed M1 M M3 M M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M1 Preliminary GO scheme User requirements Prelim. scheme (WG1) Pilot specification Pilot specification Pilot users and use configuration Preliminary procedures Monitoring plan CertifHy deliv. Monitoring plan > Endorsement by WG3 Prelim proced. (WG1) Adhoc meetings Pilot monitoring Business models Pilot online Periodic review of pilot results Prelim study of business models Cost and bus. model > Endorsed by WG3 Pilot monitoring results > Endorsed by WG3 Updating of GO scheme Recommended changes to scheme and procedures 8

65 Tasks & WG roles (1/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Defining a preliminary GO scheme Interacting with the regulatory frameworks Interacting with other standardisation frameworks Pilot specification 1. Inputs to the GO preliminary scheme design. Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design Endorses approach for strategic leverage of standardisation and interfaces with the relevant standardisation groups 1. Consulted on the GO preliminary scheme design wrt practical feasibility.. Recommendations wrt to practical feasibility. Endorses the pilot specifications from a producer perspective Inputs to the preliminary GO Scheme wrt user functional requirements Endorses the pilot specification from a user perspective Consulted to ensure that the GO preliminary scheme design compatible with EU regulation Identifies show stoppers and barriers in EU regulation Addresses the need to amend EU legislation 1. Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design. Submits to Stakeholder Platform Endorses the Pilot specifications Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO preliminary scheme design 9

66 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Managing the pilot set-up and operation Pilot preparation Defining the pilot scheme procedures Designing and setting up the ICT System Production site audits Defining the pilot monitoring and feedback collection plan 1. Inputs to scheme procedures. Endorses scheme procedures Inputs scheme procedures wrt practical feasibility Inputs on what should be monitored Informed on the pilot procedures Inputs on what should be monitored Stakeholder Platform 10

67 Tasks & WG roles (3/) Pilot operation Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Steering Group Informed of pilot operation advances Stakeholder Platform Registry operation Production batch certification Pilot monitoring Input to analysis of pilot results from the producer s perspective for identification of lessons learned Inputs to analysis of pilot results from the users perspective for identification of lessons learned Cost analysis & business models Validate cost inputs Recommend and provide feedback on proposed business models Informed of pilot results & business cases Endorses the pilot results Endorses pilot results & business cases 11

68 Tasks & WG roles (/) Task WG1 role WG role WG3 role WG role Updating the GO scheme & preparing the documentation Preparing EU rollout 1. Updates GO scheme based upon pilot results and WG and WG3 recommendations. Endorses the GO scheme Inputs to the rollout plan Endorses/Comments EU rollout plan 1. Provides recommendations to WG1. Comments the GO scheme wrt practical feasibility. 1. Inputs to the rollout plan. Endorses/Commen ts EU rollout plan 1. Provides recommendations to WG1. Comments the GO scheme wrt functional requirements 1. Inputs to the rollout plan. Endorses/comment s EU rollout plan Reviews regulatory alignment of the final scheme Validates proposed regulatory amendments required for EU-wide rollout Steering Group 1. Endorses the GO scheme. Submits the GO scheme to the Stakeholder Platform 1. Endorses the roadmap for EU roll-out. Submits the roadmap for EU roll-out to Stakeholder Platform Stakeholder Platform Endorses the GO scheme Endorses the roadmap for EU roll-out 1

69 Project supported by the FCH JU WG Chair an Co-chair election

70 Project supported by the FCH JU WG & WG3 joint work session

71 WG & WG3 joint work session - Agenda 1. Essential requirements for determining H quantity, carbon intensity, and renewable share. Options for addressing residual mix issue and information to be collected during the pilot for evaluating these options 3. Discussion of GO use cases. Essential requirements from the users side 15

72 Project supported by the FCH JU Essential requirements for determining H quantity, carbon intensity, and renewable share

73 Project supported by the FCH JU Residual mix & Use of GOs with hydrogen from non-participating sources

74 GO trading creates an undetermined residual mix for all consumers using hydrogen without a GO No GO Scheme CertifHy GO Scheme Use of green / low carbon H is restricted to vicinity of low carbon source Any user can request to be informed by the supplier of the carbon intensity of the supplied H Label stimulates demand for H from low carbon / renewable sources Green/Low Carbon H can be provided to any user supplied from a participating source However, the carbon intensity of all non-certifhy H becomes undetermined / that of the residual mix. Nonetheless, plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity n H source n H consumer from source n High carbon Benchmark Renewable and low carbon Undetermined residual mix Participating to CertifHy scheme CertifHy Green H Group of consumers supplied from sources participating to CertifHy scheme 18

75 GO trading with application of GOs to hydrogen from non-participating sources can lead to a loss of accountability for the supply/use of high carbon H CertifHy GO Scheme with application of GOs to H from participating sources only CertifHy GO Scheme with application of GOs to H from non-participating sources Plant certification requirements ensure that the residual mix does not exceed benchmark carbon intensity However, part of the market is excluded Applying conditions on the physical supply of hydrogen for using GOs generates an administrative burden Increases demand for H from LC / renewable sources However, accountability for the supply/use of high carbon hydrogen is lost ; supply continues without any user having to accept the high carbon intensity any longer The carbon intensity of the hydrogen supplied without a GO (residual mix) is increased, although not visibly due to dilution n H source n H consumer from source n High carbon Benchmark Renewable and low carbon Undetermined residual mix Participating to CertifHy scheme CertifHy Green H Group of consumers supplied from sources participating to CertifHy scheme 19

76 Information to be collected for evaluating residual mix approaches Option Evaluation criteria 1: No consideration of physical supply : Physical supplier must also be part of the GO scheme 3: Physical supplier from a non-participating source must provide GHG intensity :? Credibility Market study: H market volume fraction supplied from high carbon sources? Projected evolution? Inclusiveness Pilot: - Identification of GO pilot users supplied from a non participating source - Carbon intensity of that physical supply Market study: - H market volume fraction supplied from high carbon sources? - Projected evolution? Administrative burden Burden of - identifying source of physical supply? - applying condition on source of physical supply? Burden of - obtaining source of physical supply? - providing GHG intensity of greened H physical supplied from a non participating source? - processing of this GHG intensity data

77 Project supported by the FCH JU Discussion of GO use cases

78 GO Market GO use cases for providing that a mobility application is green or low carbon 1 H supplier GO account H H H HRS operator GO account HRS operator GO account H H H H H On-site production H Fleet operator GO account 3 H H Vehicle OEM GO account H H

79 CertifHy Implementing the first EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen Working Group Session 0/11/017 Project supported by the FCH JU 0/11/017 Karina Veum - ECN

80 WG 1 hour work session agenda (morning/afternoon) Morning session 1. Round table introduction of participants. Work programme & timeline 3. Introduction chair & co-chair Afternoon session 1. EU policy context of H GoO introduction. Discussion on REDII showstoppers 3. Date & action points for next meeting

81 Project supported by the FCH JU Morning session

82 WG: Regulatory framework Work programme Task Objectives Key questions Outputs Interaction with the regulatory framework (1) Identify and address potential showstoppers in forthcoming EUlegislation,.e.g. REDII, provide input to the pilot H GO design/specs What are potential showstoppers (i.e. barriers/frictions) in the proposed legislation in the 016 Winter package, e.g. related to GO definition(s), purpose, uses, etc. NB! WG will need to take into account amendment proposals in ongoing co-decision procedure Identify and address any frictions between pilot H GO scheme design and existing regulatory framework Recommendations for shortterm regulatory amendments Input to the design/specifications for the H GO pilot scheme Interaction with the regulatory framework () Address needed medium-term regulatory amendments needed to accommodate wellfunctioning green H GO scheme In the medium term perspective (up to 030) what are possible alignment issues between EU acquis and a proper functioning of the green hydrogen GO scheme. Identify and elaborate on how to ensure that barriers / frictions are removed, e.g. in new EU legislation. Recommendations for regulatory amendments in medium-term EU GO scheme update & Roadmap/EU roll-out Translation of required regulatory amendments into Roadmap Final review of regulatory alignment issues based on learnings from pilot case, and any input from the three other WGs What unsolved issues need to be taken on board in revised roadmap, What are outstanding alignment issues How to address these (who would be responsible, what milestones, etc) Provide recommendations on proposed regulatory changes needed and how to fit into Roadmap

83 WG: Regulatory framework Timeline Due date documents Meetings / Plenary Webinars M1 M M3 M M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M1 Regulatory Framework (short-term)(1) - List showstoppers Interface - Task.1/3.1 > regarding (pilot) design specs Output - Recommendations addressing regulatory issues in short-term Regulatory Framework (medium-term) FW () - Overview and details further regulatory alignment issues Interface - on request from other WG Output - Recommendations addressing medium-term regulatory issues Update of GO scheme & procedures - Adjust Interface - Task.1 on GO design update Output - Recom. for RM - Approval from SC 5

84 Project supported by the FCH JU Afternoon session

85 EU legislative background (TFEU, RED, FQD) TFEU: RED FQD COM to develop EU-wide energy policy coordination initiatives to ensure functioning of internal energy market, supply security, energy savings, RES development, interconnectivity (TFEU Art. 19(1)) MS responsible for developing their energy resources, energy mix and energy supply structure (TFEU Art. 19()) Defines RES & sets 00 targets for RES share in (i) total GFEC and (ii) FEC in transport Establishes a framework for use of RES energy to limit GHG and to promote cleaner transport Defines framework for GO scheme for RES REDII for timeframe in the pipeline Tightens environmental quality standards for fuel parameters, requires reduction in GHG intensity of fuels used in vehicles, imposes stricter sustainability criteria Not applicable after 00 7

86 Recast REDII proposal showstoppers? Recital 3: GO has sole function of showing to a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy was produced from renewable sources Art (g): GO means an electronic document which has the sole function of providing proof to a final customer that a given share or quantity of energy was produced from renewable sources Art 19(): MS shall ensure that no GOs are issued to a producer that producer receives financial support from a support scheme for the same production of energy from renewable sources. MS shall issue such guarantees of origin and transfer them to the market by auctioning them. The revenues raised as a result of the auctioning shall be used to offset the costs of renewables support. Art 19(7): GO shall specify at least: (a) the energy source from which the energy was produced and the start and end dates of production; (b) whether it relates to: (i) electricity; or (ii) heating or cooling; (iii) gas; (iv) hydrogen; (v) renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels from non-biological origin Art 5.1(b) for the calculation of the numerator, the energy content of advanced biofuels and other biofuels and biogas produced from feedstock listed in Annex IX, hydrogen from renewable energy sources and renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of nonbiological origin. 8

87 Discussion Showstoppers Next steps 9

88 CertifHy Implementing an EU-wide Guarantee of Origin for Green Hydrogen Pilot plant specification 0/11/017 Project supported by the FCH JU

89 Pilot plant specification SMR Port Jerome France Air Liquide Project supported by the FCH JU Guy de Reals

90 AIR LIQUIDE SMR Port Jerome Key characteristics H production capacity: ~500 kg/h H utilisation: Refining Industry, Merchant CO utilisations: Food industry, Water treatment PH control, Green houses. 3

91 Reforming Production process diagram Steam Export Key parameters HDS + Pre reforming H Export Product H pressure: 5 bar Product H purity: > 99,9% CO Capture capacity: t/y CO Export Shift & Syngas cooling H PSA Storages CryocapTM Natural Gas import

92 AIR LIQUIDE SMR Port Jerome General view 5

93 AIR LIQUIDE SMR Port Jerome PSA CRYOCAPTM 6

94 AIR LIQUIDE SMR Port Jerome Presentation video SMR 7

95 Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months) Expected hydrogen production volume Up to kg/d Green Hydrogen GOs Up to TBD kg Depending on Green BioM available and need Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs Up to kg Available for GO market Up to TBD kg Depending on Green BioM available and need Available for GO market Up to kg 8

96 Pilot plant specification H by water electrolyser Belgium Colruyt Group Project supported by the FCH JU Jonas Cautaerts

97 Colruyt Group Electrolysis (Alkaline + PEM) Key characteristics H production capacity: 8 kg/h PEM (3 kg/h) + Alkaline (5 kg/h) Storage 85 kg Fuel Cell: 10 kw 10

98 Production process diagram Key parameters 00 bar 75 forklifts / heavy duty 900 bar min 5 passenger cars Purity min 99,998 % 11

99 Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months) Expected hydrogen production volume Max 190 kg/d Green Hydrogen GOs Up to 190 kg Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs Up to 0 kg Share available for GO market 0 % Share available for GO market 0 % 1

100 Pilot plant specification H from Chlor-Alkali - Botlek Netherlands Akzo Nobel / Air Products Project supported by the FCH JU Joost Sandberg Frank Schnitzeler

101 Akzo Nobel / Air Products H from Chlor-Alkali Botlek Netherlands Key characteristics AkzoNobel Chlor-Alkali plant, 00 MW H Production capacity: 18 kt p.a. H utilisation: Delivery to Air Products Use in steam generation Key characteristics Air Products Over 0 km H pipeline Feed-in by AkzoNobel and HyCO (SMR) Supply to various refineries/chemical industry and to customers with liquid H trailers (ex. Botlek) and gaseous H trailers (ex. Pernis) 1

102 Production process diagram Key parameters Chlorine NaOH brine Chlor-alkali process H Compression & Purification H Pressure: bar ex Chlor-Alkali; 0 bar in H-pipeline Purity: > 98% ex Chlor-Alkali; >99% in H-pipeline AKZO AP Liquefaction & Storage Production capacity: t/hr CUSTOMER Trailer loading 15

103 Rotterdam Botlek Membrane Electrolysis Plant Salt Water Power Brine Electrolysis Chlorine Caustic Hydrogen 16

104 Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months) Expected hydrogen production volume 0 t/d Green Hydrogen GOs 100 t (up to 18 kt production capacity) Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs Share available for GO market 50 % Share available for GO market 17

105 Pilot plant specification Windgas Falkenhagen - Germany Uniper Project supported by the FCH JU Timo Eickelkamp

106 Uniper WindGas Falkenhagen Electrolysis Electrolysis Key characteristics H production capacity 3 kg H /h 360 m³ H /h MW el Methanation H utilisation 19 kg H /h 10 m³ H /h CO (biogenic) utilisation 10 kg CO /h 5,5 m³ CO /h SNG 1 production capacity 1 kg SNG /h 57 m³ SNG /h Source: Google maps 1 SNG = Synthetic Natural Gas 19

107 ONTRAS gas pipeline Production process diagram Possible certification boundary Possible certification boundary Key parameters Electrolysis Electricity grid incl. wind farm connection (green el. GOs) 6 Electrolysis container MW el, 10 bar(g) 360 Nm³/h Measuring and control system Hydrogen Compressor Hydrogen and/or SNG (methane) bar(g) Product H pressure 10 bar Product H purity 5.0 Feed in either into gas grid (certified as biogas) or in future into methanation plant CO Source (biogenic origin) Methanation 10 Nm³/h H 57 Nm³/h SNG 1 Measuring and control system SNG 1 (methane) Prequalified for secondary control reserve 1 SNG = Synthetic Natural Gas Methanation Catalytic methanation Product SNG 1 purity G60 0

108 WindGas Falkenhagen 1

109 Expected GO issuing and use during pilot (6 Months) Expected hydrogen production volume Up to 38,000 kg H /a (max. 56 kg H /d) 1 Green Hydrogen GOs Up to 38,000 kg Low Carbon Hydrogen GOs 0 kg Share available for GO market Up to 100 % Share available for GO market 0 % 1 In addition up to 19,000 kg H / a (direct feed in / no methanation)