Clean Coal and Co-Production Potential

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Clean Coal and Co-Production Potential"

Transcription

1 Clean Coal and Co-Production Potential Clean Coal For Transportation Fuels Workshop Purdue University West Lafayette, IN December 2, 2005 Tom Lynch, Chief Engineer - Gasification thomas.a.lynch@conocophillips.com

2 Outline 1. ConocoPhillips 2. E-Gas Technical Heritage 3. Gasification Process 4. LGTI experience at Dow 5. Wabash Experience 6. Environmental Benefits of Gasification 7. FT Liquids Experience

3 ConocoPhillips Introduction NYSE: COP Eighth largest publicly owned energy company worldwide based on oil & gas reserves Third largest integrated energy company in the United States Second largest refiner in US, 5 th in world World s leading producer of petroleum coke Headquartered in Houston

4 E-Gas Gasification Commercial Feedstock Offerings and Gasifier Scale-up 1975 Pilot 36 TPD 1979 Proto TPD 1983 Proto TPD LGTI ,400 TPD Wabash ,600 TPD For 2010 Start-up E-Gas Technology Commercial Offerings Bituminous Sub-Bituminous Petcoke Bituminous IL #6 coal Petcoke Multiple refineries. Sub-Bituminous Rochelle Mine

5 FT Liquids Production

6 LGTI Summary Operated at Dow Chemical s Louisiana Division under Synfuels Corporation Contract Over one third of the coal-to-power gasification in U.S. Supplied Syngas to two Siemens Westinghouse W501D5 turbines 2400 TPD sub-bituminous coal feed (1.5 X scale-up) Over 3.7 million tons of sub-bituminous coal processed Included significant testing of dry particulate removal system and petroleum coke and bituminous coal (second stage only)

7 Wabash River One of the Cleanest Coal Fired Power Plants in the World 1.7 million tons of bituminous 1.3 million tons of petcoke 2500 TPD bituminous coal feed 262 MW Net output Operational since 1995 at Cinergy s Wabash River Plant SG Solutions LLC now owns Syngas Plant, ConocoPhillips provides professional services on site Source: SG Solutions, LLC

8 HRSG Gas Turbine Wabash River IGCC Gasifier Oxygen Plant Steam Turbine Slag & Sulfur Unloading

9 Wabash Emissions Comparison Emissions, lb/mwh SO2 NOx CO PM-10 VOC Unit 1 before Repowering IGCC (1999 annual average) Emissions Reduction TPY 5,505 1,179 (83) 101 (25) Comparing 100 MW PC unit running 35% availability and 262 MW IGCC running 75% availability (5.6 X more megawatt hours produced)

10 Repowering Emissions Comparison lb/mwh Unit 1 Before Repowering IGCC (1999 Annual Avg) Lb/MWh Unit 1 Before Repowering IGCC (1999 Annual Avg) 0 SO2 NOx Source: Wabash River Repowering Project, 1999 average reported to IDNR 0.0 CO PM-10 VOC

11 Comparative Emissions of Coal Based Power Plants SO2 NOx CO PM/PM10 lb / MMBtu SCPC 1 PCw/FGD 2 CFB 3 Wabash 4 Next E-Gas 1) Wisconsin Electric Power SCPC information from April 2003 Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Elm Road Generating Station, Volume 1, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin & Department of Natural Resources, Table 7-11, p. 155 (Pittsburgh No. 8 coal) 2) Evaluation of IGCC to Supplement BACT Analysis of Planned Prairie State Generating Station, May 11, Prepared by Donald J. Wilhelm SFA Pacific, Inc. for Prairie State Generating Company, LLC. 3) Supplemental Information for PSD Permit Application, March 25, 2003, Prepared by Earth Tech, Inc. for Indeck - Elwood, LLC. 4) Wabash River Repowering Project, 1999 average reported to IDNR

12 Total Air Emissions From Coal Power Plants Tons per year PC w/ FGD CFB SCPC Wabash Next E-Gas From references cited in previous slide. All plants scaled to 550 MW at 90% annual capacity factor.

13 Pollutant Removal Advantages Mercury Removal 90-95% removal utilizing carbon beds Carbon Dioxide Gasification is the most cost effective method for CO2 removal

14 Solid Byproducts not Wastes Sulfur % pure 100,000+ tons sold at Wabash 400,000,000 equivalent lbs of SO 2 Slag - Black, glassy sand like material Inert, passes TCLP & UTS Asphalt Construction backfill Landfill cover

15 ConocoPhillips GTL History 1997 Started R&D with DuPont 1999 Conoco Spin-off from DuPont World class R&D Organization/Facility in Ponca City 2001 Commit 400 BPD Demonstration Plant 2002 Conoco & Phillips Petroleum Merge 2003 Start up GTL Demonstration Plant 2003 COP Acquisition of E-Gas Technology

16 ConocoPhillips Gas-to-Liquids Technology Gas Processing Air Separation Offsites: Buildings, Controls, Flares, Fire Water COPox Syngas Fischer Tropsch ConocoPhillips Gas Technology Product Refining Integrated Utilities: Water, Steam, Power, Air, Nitrogen Product Storage & Export

17 Demonstration Plant Ponca City, Oklahoma

18 Gasification Common Sense For Energy And The Environment