Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/03/25 Certification Date 2013/05/29 Current Property Use Commercial Intended Property Use Commercial Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard, with Potable Ground Water, Coarse Textured Soil, for Commercial property use Property Municipal Address 358 Norwich Avenue, Ontario, N4S 3W2 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment. 1 of 34

2 RSC Information Each field marked by an asterisk (* ) must be completed. Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage; a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? Yes No Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part (a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or (b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property? Yes No * * Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use? Yes * No Select Type of RSC * Phase 1 and 2 RSC Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA 2 of 34

3 Owner Information Owners' General Information Submitting Owner's Information Owner's Information Owners' General Information Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? * Yes No Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? * Yes No QP Profile Information Certification Statement 3 of 34

4 Owner Information Owners' General Information Submitting Owner's Information QP Profile Information Certification Statement Owner's Information Submitting Owner's Information Type of Owner * Owner Name * Firm, Corporation or Partnership HRI Holdings Inc. Street Number 9768 * Street Name 170 Street * Apt No. /RR No. City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code * Country Edmonton Alberta T5T 5L4 Canada Submitting Owner's Contact Information Contact First Name * Contact Last Name * Bill Hanson Phone Number * (including area code) Fax Number (including area code) Address (780) of 34

5 Owner Information Property Address Municipality Information Property Address Does the Property have a Municipal Address? Yes No * Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act? Yes No * Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Street Number * Street Name * 358 Norwich Avenue Apt No. /RR No. City, Town or Village * Woodstock Province * Ontario Postal Code * N4S 3W2 QP Profile Information Certification Statement 5 of 34

6 Owner Information Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) Municipality & Property Address Information Municipality Information Lower or Single Tier Municipality * Woodstock Tier of Municipality Upper Tier Municipality Lower Tier Oxford The District Office of MOE * London District Office Address of District Office of MOE 733 Exeter Road, London ON N6E 1L3 QP Profile Information Certification Statement 6 of 34

7 Owner Information Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Municipality & Property Address Information Property Reference Number Assessment Roll Number Property Identifier Number (PIN #) LT Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) QP Profile Information Certification Statement 7 of 34

8 Owner Information Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) QP Profile Information Geo Reference & Other Properties Details Geographical References UTM Coordinates Datum NAD 83 Zone * 17 Easting * 521, Northing * 4,774, Area of RSC Property Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares * 0.4 Certification Statement 8 of 34

9 Owner Information Previous Submission Information Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number: Property Address Municipality Information Property Reference Number Previously Filed Transition Notice Number: Geographical Reference/Area of RSC Property Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s) QP Profile Information Certification Statement 9 of 34

10 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Certification Statement Site Condition Information Other Site Condition Information Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation? Yes No * 10 of 34

11 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Certification Statement Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Is Property: (i) Within an area of natural significance? or Does Property: (ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or (ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area. Yes No Soil at the property has: (i) a ph value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or (ii) a ph value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11. Yes No Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? * Yes No What is the intended use of the property? * Commercial * * Is the property a shallow soil property? Yes No * Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within 30 metres of a water body? * Yes No What is the Assessment/Restoration approach? Background * Full Depth Generic Stratified What is the ground water condition for the property? Potable * Non-potable What is the texture of the soil? Coarse * Medium and Fine Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 2 11 of 34

12 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Risk Assessment Information Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section of the Act for the RSC property? Yes No Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Certification Statement 12 of 34

13 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Property Use and Certification Date Current Property Use and Certification Date What is the current use of the property? * Commercial Certification Date * 2013/05/29 Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Date Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Certification Statement 13 of 34

14 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Remedial Action & Mitigation Soil Control or Treatment Measures Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process. Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres. Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres. QP Profile Information Certification Statement Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation. 14 of 34

15 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Remedial Action & Mitigation Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the RSC property after the certification date. Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property. Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Uses of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Other Treatment Measures Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above, identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property. Certification Statement Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures or soil management measures. 15 of 34

16 Owner Information Other Site Condition Information Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards Risk Assessment Information Property Use and Certification Data Remedial Action and Mitigation Details Potential Environmental Concern Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Are there areas of potential environmental concern? * Yes No Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form Current and Past Property Use Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Table of Current/Past Property Use of Phase One Property QP Profile Information Certification Statement 16 of 34

17 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Contaminants Measured in SOIL General Information Related to Soil Media Is there no soil on, in or under the property? * (Note there is no soil if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives of a phase two environmental site assessment) Yes No 17 of 34

18 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Benzene Measured µg/g Toluene Measured µg/g Ethylbenzene Measured µg/g Xylene Mixture Measured µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 Measured µg/g Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 Measured µg/g Acetone Minimum Detectable.1 16 µg/g Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Bromoform Minimum Detectable µg/g Bromomethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable µg/g Chloroform Minimum Detectable µg/g Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloropropene,1,3- Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichloropropene,1,3- Minimum Detectable µg/g Ethylene dibromide Minimum Detectable µg/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/g Total # of Contaminants of 34

19 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant 31-60* Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable µg/g Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Styrene Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/g Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/g Antimony Minimum Detectable µg/g Arsenic Measured 3 18 µg/g Barium Measured µg/g Beryllium Measured µg/g Boron (total) Minimum Detectable µg/g Cadmium Measured µg/g Chromium Total Measured µg/g Cobalt Measured µg/g Copper Measured µg/g Lead Measured µg/g Molybdenum Minimum Detectable µg/g Nickel Measured µg/g Selenium Minimum Detectable µg/g Silver Minimum Detectable µg/g Thallium Measured µg/g Uranium Measured µg/g Vanadium Measured µg/g Zinc Measured µg/g Acenaphthene Minimum Detectable µg/g Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Total # of Contaminants of 34

20 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in SOIL Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil Contaminant 61-90* Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzo[a]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzo[b]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzo[ghi]perylene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benzo[k]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/g Chrysene Minimum Detectable µg/g Dibenz[a h]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/g Fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/g Fluorene Minimum Detectable µg/g Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/g Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** Minimum Detectable µg/g Naphthalene Minimum Detectable µg/g Phenanthrene Minimum Detectable µg/g Pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/g Benz[a]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/g Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Hexane (n) Measured µg/g Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/g Total # of Contaminants of 34

21 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant 1-30 * Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Benzene Measured µg/l Toluene Measured µg/l Ethylbenzene Measured µg/l Xylene Mixture Measured µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 Minimum Detectable µg/l Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 Minimum Detectable µg/l Acetone Measured µg/l Bromodichloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Bromoform Minimum Detectable 1 25 µg/l Bromomethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Carbon Tetrachloride Minimum Detectable µg/l Chlorobenzene Minimum Detectable µg/l Chloroform Minimum Detectable µg/l Dibromochloromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichlorodifluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethane, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethylene, 1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- Measured µg/l Dichloropropane, 1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Dichloropropene,1,3- Minimum Detectable µg/l Ethylene dibromide Minimum Detectable µg/l Hexane (n) Minimum Detectable 1 51 µg/l Methyl Ethyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/l Total # of Contaminants of 34

22 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant 31-60* Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Minimum Detectable µg/l Methyl tert-butyl Ether (MTBE) Minimum Detectable µg/l Methylene Chloride Minimum Detectable 2 50 µg/l Styrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Tetrachloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichloroethylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Trichlorofluoromethane Minimum Detectable µg/l Vinyl Chloride Minimum Detectable µg/l Antimony Minimum Detectable µg/l Arsenic Measured 2 25 µg/l Barium Measured µg/l Beryllium Minimum Detectable µg/l Boron (total) Measured µg/l Cadmium Minimum Detectable µg/l Chromium Total Minimum Detectable 5 50 µg/l Cobalt Measured µg/l Copper Measured 2 87 µg/l Lead Minimum Detectable µg/l Molybdenum Measured 3 70 µg/l Nickel Measured µg/l Selenium Minimum Detectable 2 10 µg/l Silver Minimum Detectable µg/l Sodium Measured µg/l Thallium Minimum Detectable µg/l Uranium Measured µg/l Vanadium Minimum Detectable µg/l Total # of Contaminants of 34

23 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in Ground Water Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water Contaminant 61-90* Type of Measurement * Measured * Applicable Concentration Standard Unit Of Measure Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Zinc Measured µg/l Acenaphthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Acenaphthylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benz[a]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[a]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[b]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[ghi]perylene Minimum Detectable µg/l Benzo[k]fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Chrysene Minimum Detectable µg/l Dibenz[a h]anthracene Minimum Detectable µg/l Fluoranthene Minimum Detectable µg/l Fluorene Minimum Detectable µg/l Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** Minimum Detectable µg/l Naphthalene Minimum Detectable µg/l Phenanthrene Measured µg/l Pyrene Minimum Detectable µg/l Total # of Contaminants of 34

24 Owner Information Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement Contaminants Measured in Sediments Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property? Yes No * 24 of 34

25 Owner Information Laboratory Information Laboratory Name * Maxxam Analytics Inc. Contaminants Measured in SOIL Contaminants Measured in GROUND WATER Contaminants Measured in SEDIMENTS QP Profile Information Certification Statement 25 of 34

26 Owner Information Phase One ESA Reports ESA Reports Phase One ESA Reports The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done. 2012/07/12 * Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report * Name of Consulting Organization Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase One ESA Phase One Envir 2013/02/05 Erika Ryter, P.Eng Stantec Consulting L Update to Phase One ESA Update to Phase 2014/02/10 Nick Young, M.Eng Stantec Consulting L Phase Two Reports and Other Documents QP Profile Information Certification Statement 26 of 34

27 Owner Information Phase One ESA Reports ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done. 2013/05/29 * Type of Report * Report Title * Date of Report* Author of Report * Name of Consulting Organization Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase Two ESA Phase Two Envir 2013/07/29 NIck Young, M.En Stantec Consulting L Update to Phase Two ESA Update to Phase 2014/02/10 Nick Young, M.Eng Stantec Consulting L Phase Two Reports and Other Documents QP Profile Information Certification Statement 27 of 34

28 Owner Information Reports and Other Documents Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA Phase One ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase Two Reports and Other Documents QP Profile Information Certification Statement Report Title Date of Report Author of Report Name of Consulting Organization for Report 28 of 34

29 Owner Information Reports and Other Documents Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA Phase One ESA Reports Phase Two ESA Reports Phase One Reports and Other Documents Phase Two Reports and Other Documents QP Profile Information Certification Statement Report Title Date of Report Author of Report Name of Consulting Organization for Report 29 of 34

30 Owner Information QP Information First Name * Middle Name Nicholas John Which one of the following licences under the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? * None Last Name * Young QP Profile Information Which one of the following memberships under the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? * Practising Member Membership Number 457 * QP Information Certification Statement Is the QP Employed? Yes * Employer Name Stantec Consulting Ltd. * No QP Contact Information Phone Number * Fax Number * * (905) (905) nick.young@stantec.com QP Mailing Address Information Street Number * Street Name * Apt No. / RR No. 835 Paramount Drive suite 200 City, Town or Village * Province * Postal Code * Stoney Creek Ontario L8J 0B4 30 of 34

31 Owner Information QP Profile Information Certification Statement QP Certification Statement Owner Certification Statement QP Certification Statement C As the qualified person, I certify that: * A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary. As of 2013/05/29, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC. Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. As of 2013/05/29, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment. As of 2013/05/29, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2013/05/29. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition. Nicholas John Young 2014/02/13 31 of 34

32 Owner Information Owner Certification Statement Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form QP Profile Information Certification Statement QP Certification Statement Owner Certification Statement 32 of 34

33 Owner Information Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document. Certificate of Status or equivalent * QP Profile Information Certification Statement 1_certificate of status.pdf Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property 2_lawyers letter renorwich Ave.pdf Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) * 3_Transfer.pdf * A Current plan of Survey * 4_358_norwich_site_survey.pdf Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern 5_APEC_table.pdf * Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property * 6_TABLE_OF_CURRENT_PAST_PROPERTY_USES_revised.pdf Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model * 7_Phase_two_CSM.pdf Owner Certification Statement * 8_owner_certification.pdf 33 of 34

34 34 of 34

35 Corporate Access Number CERTIFICATE OF STATUS Form 32 I CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE CORPORATE REGISTRY HRI HOLDINGS INC. INCORPORATED IN ALBERTA ON 1993/05/27 IS AS OF THIS DATE A VALID AND SUBSISTING CORPORATION. GIVEN UNDER MY SEAL OF OFFICE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA. DATED: 2014/03/19

36

37

38

39

40

41

42 "TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN" (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04) Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 2 Location of PCA (on-site or offsite) Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 Media Potentially Impacted (Groundwater, soil and/or sediment) APEC #1: Former presence of a gasoline service station and auto repair facility on Site. Across the Phase One Property Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Commercial Autobody Shop On-Site PHC VOCs PAHs Lead Soil Groundwater APEC #2: Fill material of unknown origin Across the Phase One Property Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality On-Site PAHs Metals Soil APEC #3: Identified PHC Impacts to soil and groundwater east of the Phase One Property boundary Eastern Property Boundary Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Off-Site Soil and groundwater impacts identified east of the phase one property within Norwich Avenue. PHC Soil Groundwater APEC #4: Presence of a former dry cleaner with potential onsite dry cleaning activities. Eastern Property Boundary Operation of Dry Cleaning Equipment Off-Site Norwich Avenue VOCs Soil Groundwater

43 Area of Potential Environmental Concern 1 Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One Property Potentially Contaminating Activity 2 Location of PCA (on-site or offsite) Contaminants of Potential Concern 3 Media Potentially Impacted (Groundwater, soil and/or sediment) APEC #5: Current and historic off- Site gasoline service stations and auto repair Southeastern portion of the Phase One Property Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks Commercial Auto Body Shops Off-Site 361 Norwich Avenue and 371 Parkinson Road PHC VOCs Metals Soil Groundwater Notes: 1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present, as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through, (a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and (b) identification of potentially contaminating activity. 2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a phase one study area 3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the "Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high ph PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low ph 4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n est disponible qu en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l Environnement au

44 "TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY" (Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04) Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use 1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc Edward Nettelton Agricultural Agricultural A review of the 1945 aerial photograph indicates the Phase One Property appears it be occupied by an agriculture field Frances Helsdon Agricultural Agricultural A review of the 1945 aerial photograph indicates the Phase One Property appears it be occupied by an agriculture field William and Gladys Losee Commercial Autobody Shop Commercial A review of City Directories shows Losee Auto Clinic on the property in Walter Spark Commercial Autobody Shop Commercial A review of City Directories shows White, G and Sons Co Ltd. on the property in Reliance Petroleum Ltd. Commercial Autobody Shop and Commercial Supertest Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Petroleum Retail Outlet Commercial Autobody Shop and Petroleum Retail Outlet BP Canada Ltd. Commercial Autobody Shop and Petroleum Retail Outlet BP Oil Limited Commercial Autobody Shop and Petroleum Retail Outlet Commercial Commercial Commercial A review of City Directories shows Morrison EL Service Station on the property in 1960, Magill Motors on the property from 1964 to 1968 and Versteg s Hank s Supertest on the property from 1970 to A review of City Directories show Versteg s Hank s Supertest on the property from 1970 to A review of City Directories show Versteg s Hank s Supertest on the property from 1970 to 1974, Finucan & Wade service station on the property from 1978 to 1982, Petro-Canada Products on the property from 1984 to 1988 and New Tune Auto Centre on the property in A review of records from the TSSA indicated the presence of 4 gasoline USTs at the site in A 1990 Property Underwriters Report was identified the Phase One Property as a fuel service station and auto repair shop Petro-Canada Inc. Commercial Autobody Shop Commercial A review of City Directories show Sid s Auto Centre on the property in 1992, Apples Plus on the property from 1996 to 1997, and K&H Wholesale, Peterman s Used Cars, Discount Car, and Oxford Auto Repairs on the property

45 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use 1 Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc. from 2000 to A review of TSSA records show an expired full service gasoline service station owned by Sid Visser occupied the site in A review of the 2000 aerial photograph indicates the presence of a commercial building on the Phase One Property. A review of the 2000 and 2006 aerial photograph and 2006 Google Earth imagery indicates the presence of a commercial building on the Phase One Property. A 2003 property underwriters report identified the site as an automotive repair shop Suncor Energy Inc. Commercial Autobody Shop Commercial A review of City Directories show K&H Wholesale, Peterman s Used Cars, Discount Car, and Oxford Auto Repairs on the property from 2000 to Based on a review of previous environmental reports the former service station building was demolished in approximately A review of the 2010 aerial photographs indicated the building has been removed. The Phase One Property has been present HRI Holdings Inc. Vacant Commercial vacant since that time. Notes: 1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies: Agriculture or other use Commercial use Community use Industrial use Institutional use Parkland use Residential use 2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached **Cette publication hautement spécialisée n est disponible qu en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l Environnement au *** According to the title search completed by Richard Reid, title searcher, the first available record for the RSC property was 1916.

46 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Phase Two Conceptual Site Model Stantec has prepared a conceptual site model (CSM) and several figures to assist with organizing, presenting, and understanding the potential and/or actual environmental concerns related to soil and groundwater at the Record of Site Condition Property located at 358 Norwich Avenue (the RSC Property or the Site ). The location of the RSC Property is shown on Figure 1. Site features are shown on Figure 2. The table below summarizes the mandatory CSM components and associated document location reference as specified by Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04, Schedulee E, Table 1. Table 1 Summary of Mandatory CSM Components and Associated Document Reference Mandatory Conceptual Site Model Component i. a description and assessment of, A. areas where potentially contaminating activity has occurred, B. areas of potential environmental concern, and C. any subsurface structures and utilities on, in or under the phase two property that may affect contaminan distribution and transport, ii. a description of and, as appropriate, figures illustrating, the physical setting of the phase two property and any areas under it including, A. stratigraphy from ground surface to the deepest aquifer or aquitard investigated, B. hydrogeological characteristics, including aquifers, aquitards and, in each hydrostratigraphic unit wheree one or moree contaminants is present at concentrations above the applicable site condition standards, lateral and vertical gradients, C. approximate depth to bedrock, D. approximate depth to water table, E. any respect in which section 41 or 43.1 of the regulation applies to the property, F. areas where soil has been brought from another property and placed on, in or under the phase two property, and G. approximate locations, if known, of any proposed buildings and other structures, iii. where a contaminan is present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard, identification of, A. each area where a contaminant is present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard, B. the contaminants associated with each of the areas referred to in subparagraph A, C. each mediumm in which a contaminant associated with an area referred to in subparagraph is present, Location in CSM (Section and/or Figure) Section 1.1, APEC Table, Figure 2 Section 1.1, APEC Table, Figure 2 Section 1.2, Section 2.0 Section 1.3, Figures 3 to 5 Section 2.0, Figures 6 and 8 Section 1.3 Section 1.3, Figures 3 to 5, Section 1.3 Section 1.3, Figures 3 to 5 Section 1.2 Section 3.1, Section 3.2, Figures 9 and 10 Section 3.1, Section 3.2, Figures 9 and 10 Section 3.1, Section 3.2, Figures 9 and 10 kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 1.1

47 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Mandatory Conceptual Site Model Component D. a description and assessment of what is known about each of the areas referred to in subparagraph A, E. the distribution, in each of the areas referred to in subparagraph A, of each contaminant present in the area at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard, for each medium in which the contaminant iss present, together with figures showing the distribution, F. anything known about the reason for the discharge of the contaminants present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard into the natural environment, G. anything known about migration of the contaminants present on, in or under the phase two property at a concentration greater than the applicable site condition standard away from any area of potential environmental concern, includingg the identification of any preferential pathways, H. climatic or meteorologicall conditions that may havee influenced distribution and migration of the contaminants, such as temporal fluctuations in ground water levels, and I. if applicable, information i concerning soil vapour intrusion of the contaminants into buildings ncluding, 1. relevant constructionn features of a building, such as a basement or crawl space, 2. building heating, ventilating and air conditioning design and operation, and 3. subsurface utilities, iv. where contaminants on, in or under the phase two propertyy are present at concentrations greater than the applicable site condition standard, one or more cross-sections showing, A. the lateral and vertical distribution of a contaminant in each area where the contaminants is present at concentrations greater than the applicable site condition standard in soil, ground water and sediment, B. approximate depth to water table in each area referred to in subparagraph A, C. stratigraphy from ground surface to the deepest aquifer or aquitard investigated, and D. any subsurface structures and utilities that may affect contaminant distribution and transport in each area referred to in subparagraph A. v. for each areas wheree a contaminant is present on, in or under the property at a concentration greaterr than the applicable site condition standard for the contaminant, a diagram identifying, with narrative explanatory notes, A. the release mechanisms, B. contaminant transport pathway, C. the human and ecological receptors located on, in or under the phase two property, D. receptor exposure points, and E. routes of exposure. Location in CSM (Section and/or Figure) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Figures 3 to 5 Not Applicable Figures 3 to 5 Not Applicable Figures 3 to 5 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 1.2

48 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 1.0 Site Characteristics 1.1 AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONME ENTAL CONCERN (APECs) The Phase One ESA ( Stantec, 2013a) identified on and off-site Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCA) with the potential to contribute to APECss on the RSC Property. Five APECs were identifiedd at the RSC Property. Two of the APECs were associated with on-site historical PCAs. The remaining three APECs were associated with an off-site PCA to the east of the RSC Property. The locations of the PCAs and APECs are shown on Figure 2. The PCAs and APECs are discussed in detail below. PCAs The Phase One ESA identified the following PCAs that were historically present on the RSC Property: Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks associated with a commercial autobody shop formerly operated on the Site. Importation of fill material of unknownn quality associated with historical grading activities across the entiree Site. The Phase One ESA identified the following PCAs that may have impacted soil and/or groundwater on the RSC Property that were currently or historically present on neighboring properties. Operation of dry cleaning equipment associated with the current / historical use of the neighboring property as a commercial dry cleaner that potentially completed on premise dry cleaning activities. This property was located across Norwich Avenue to the east of the Site. Known petroleum hydrocarbon impacts to the soil and groundwater beneath the Norwich Avenue roadway immediately east of the RSC Property. Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks associated with a commercial autobody shop formerly and currently operated to the east of the Site across Norwich Avenue. APECs The PCAs were considered to have the potential to contribute to five APECs on the RSC Property. The contaminants of concern (COCs) considered potentially present as a result of the PCAs were volatile organic compounds (VOCs), petroleum hydrocarbon fractions 1 to 4 (PHC F1 to F4), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals. kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 1.3

49 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL APEC 1 Former presence of a gasoline service station and autobody repair facility at the RSC property (VOCs, PHC F1 to F4, PAHs and lead in soil and groundwater). APEC 2 Fill of unknown origin found across the entire RSC property (PAHs and metals in soil). APEC 3 Identified petroleum hydrocarbon impacts to soil and groundwater east of the RSC Property boundary (VOCs and PHC F1 to F4 in soil and groundwater). APEC 4 Presence of a former dry cleaner with potential on-site stationss and auto repair east of the dry cleaning activities (VOCs in soil and groundwater). APEC 5 Current and historic off-site gasoline service RSC Property (VOCs, PHC F1 to F4, and metals in soil and groundwater). Stantec completed a Phase Two ESA (Stantec 2013b) att the RSC Property to assess soil and groundwater quality at and proximate to the APECs. Thee Phase Two ESA findings are summarized, where applicable, in the following sections.. The Phase Two ESA completed at the RSC Property included the advancement of seven boreholes (BH201 to BH207), all of which weree instrumented as monitoring wells. As part of the Phase Two ESA Stantec reviewed all available previous reports and determined that based on the available analytical data no further testing was required within the previously excavated areas. The results of the Phase Two ESA support this conclusion as all soil and groundwater samples submitted for laboratory analysis met the applicable site condition standards (SCS). The boreholes were installed to assess the APECs identified by the Phase One ESA as follows: APEC 1 and 2 BH201 to BH207 were advanced across the RSC Property to investigate the former presence of a gasoline service stationn and auto repair facility and fill of unknown origin. Soil and groundwate er samples were analyzed for VOCs, PHC F1 to F4, PAHs and metals. APEC 3 BH202 and BH203 were advanced proximate to the eastern property to investigate PHC impacts to soil and groundwater r east of the property boundary. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and PHC F1 to F4. APEC 4 BH202 and BH203 were advanced proximate to the eastern property to investigate the presence of a former drycleaner. Soil and groundwater samples weree analyzed for VOCs. APEC 5 BH203 was advanced in the southeast corner of the property to investigatee potential migration of impacts related to current and historical off-site gasoline service stations and auto repair facilities. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs, PHC F1 to F4, and metals. kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 1.4

50 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 1.2 PROPERTY USE AND SERVICES At the time of the Phase Two ESA, the RSC Property was a vacant, undevelopedd lot without utilities servicing (storm and sanitary sewers, water, and natural gas) the property. All Site services were reportedly removed during decommissioning of thee former service station in No current or historical underground d utilities weree known to enter the RSC Property from neighboring properties. Redevelopment plans associated with the RSC Property are in progress and specific locations of proposed buildings have yet to be confirmed. However, the future use of the RSC Property will likely be commerciall property use. 1.3 STRATIGRAP PHY, SOIL CHARACTERI ISTICS, AND SOIL MANAGEMENT At the time of the Phase Two ESA, near surface soil at thee RSC Property was typically fill material. Sand and gravel fill was generally present from surface to depths ranging from approximately 0.76 m below ground surface (mbgs) to 4.57 mbgs. Native soil beneath the observed fill materials consisted of interbedded sand, silt and/or sand and gravel layers to the maximum depth of the boreholes. Bedrock was not encountered during the Phase Two ESA, but based on information obtained from an Ontario MOE Water Well search request, bedrock in the vicinity of the site can be found at approximately 22.0 m below ground surface. The dominant overburden soil texture at the RSC Property was silty sand underlying sand and gravel fill. Cross-sections were prepared to illustrate the site stratigraphy. Figure 3 shows the cross- than 50% of soil by mass was greater than 75 µm in diameter. Therefore, the representative soil section locations. The site stratigraphy is shown on Figures 4 and 5. Grain size analyses completed for soil collected from thee RSC Property indicatedd that greater texture at the RSC Property was considered coarse grained in accordance with O.Reg.153/ 04. The RSC Property was not part of or adjacent to an areaa of natural significance. The soil ph was within the permitted ranges of 5 to11 for subsurface soils and 5 to 9 for surface soils. Also, based on previously conducted site assessments, it was concluded that the RSC Property was not a shallow soil property, did not include a water body, and was not within 30 m of a water body. Therefore, the RSC Property was not considered environmentally sensitive under Section 43.1 of O.Reg.153/ Hydrogeo ologic Characteristics At the time of Phase Two ESA, the shallow overburden groundwater elevations were measured during three monitoring events (March 2011, May 2012, and May 2013) at the RSC Property. The measured depth to groundwate r ranged from 1.43 mbgs (BH206 in March 2011) to 2.58 mbgs (BH201 in May2012). Groundwater elevations (relative too a local datum) ranged from m (BH206) to m (BH201). kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 2.5

51 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL The average horizontal hydraulic gradient in May 2012 was approximately Only one aquifer was observed on the RSC Property. Therefore, nested groundwater wells were not installed on the Site and vertical hydraulic gradients weree not calculated. Hydraulic conductivity (K) of the overburden soils (3.74 x 10-4 cm/sec) at the RSC Property was estimated through the completion a single well responsee at BH204. The estimated linear groundwater velocity within the overburden materials, using an assumed porosity of 0.4 and the calculated horizontal hydraulic gradient of 0.03 was approximately 8.85 m/year. Note that the theoretical estimation of linear groundwater velocity does not consider local influences such as preferential pathways that may result in an increase in groundwater flow velocity. Further, the actual migration rate of dissolved-phase contaminants will generally be less than the estimated groundwater r flow velocity due to natural attenuation processes including advection, dispersion, sorption, volatilization, and biodegradation (i. e., dissolvedd impacts would likely migrate at a slower rate) as well as the physical characteristics of individual contaminants. 3.0 Soil and Groundw water Characterization Site specific geologic and hydrogeologic parameters that influenced the derivation of the pathway specific component values for the 2011 O.Reg.153/04 generic SCS were compared to the generic values used in the derivation of the SCS. The site-specificc parameters were generally similar to the defaults; therefore, the generic SCS were considered applicable to the Site. The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) indicates that deviations from the generic assumptions do not necessarily indicate that the generic criteria are not valid for a given site. (MOE, 2011) and that There are many interrelated parameters and factors that weree used in the development of the generic standards, and in many cases one factor...can be outweighed by differences in other factors in a manner that, overall, there is sufficient natural protection provided by the site. In addition, it must also be considered that the component that drives the standard may not be affected by the particular limiting condition (MOE, 2011); therefore, it is the opinion of the Qualified Person (QPESA) that the 2011 MOE Table 2 SCS are appropriate for use at the RSC Property. 3.1 Soil Characterization Phase Two ESA Former activities at and proximate to the RSC Property have not resulted in soil impacts associated with the APECs identified by the Phase One ESA (Stantec, 2013a). Soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis and concentrations of all analyzed parameters were less than the applicable 2011 MOE Table 2 SCS (Figuree 9). Fill materials of unknown quality, historically used for grading across the entiree site, have been adequately assessed by the Phase Two ESA and meet the applicable O.Reg. 153/04 standards. kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 3.6

52 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 3.2 Groundwate er Characterization Phase Two ESA Former activities at and proximate to the RSC Property have not resulted in groundwater impacts associated with the PCAs/APECs identified by the Phase One ESA (Stantec, 2013b). Groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis and concentrations of all analyzed parameters were lesss than the applicable 2011 MOE Table 2 SCS (Figure 10). 4.0 Referenc ces Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 2011a. Ontario Regulation 153/04 Under Part XV. 1 of the Environmental Protection Act. July 1, Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) 2013a. Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 358 Norwich Avenue, Woodstock, Ontario. February 5, 2013 Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) 2013b. Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 358 Norwich Avenue, Woodstock, Ontario. July 29, 2013 kw v:\01221\active\ \planning\report\csm\ \ _csm.docx 4.7

53 Highway 59 Highway 59 TOWNSHIP OF EAST ZORRA-TAVISTOCK Oxford Road 17 13th Line Township Road 3 TOWNSHIP OF BLANDFORD-BLENHEIM Oxford Road 17 P ittock Park Road Gordon Pittock Reservoir Springbank Avenue North Oxford Road 35 11th Line Highway 2 Beachville Road Karn Road Thames River TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH-WEST OXFORD Highway 401 Ingersoll Road Oxford Street Brant Street Vansittart Avenue Main Street Mill Street Cedar Creek Huron Street Bay Street Henry Street Sweaburg Road Devonshire Avenue CITY OF WOODSTOCK ^_ Alice Street Highway 401 Lansdowne Avenue \\cd1004-f01\work_group\01221\active\ _data_base_mgmt\databases\ Suncor Monitoring\225_Woodstock\Drawing\MXD\Phase 2 CSM\ _225_Ph2CSM_Fig01_SiteLocation.mxd Revised: By: mkirkpatrick km :50, Springbank Avenue South TOWNSHIP OF NORWICH Highway Parkinson Road Oxford Road 4 Pattullo Avenue Oxford 4 Highway 403 Dundas Street Curries Road Towerline Road June Legend ^_ Site Location Rail Line Municipal Boundary Highway Major Road Local Road Watercourse Waterbody Wooded Area Client/Project HRI Holdings Inc. 358 Norwich Avenue Woodstock, Ontario Figure No. 1 Notes Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Base features produced under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Queen's Printer for Ontario, Title Site Location

54 BH201 &( BH1 \\cd1004-f01\work_group\01221\active\ _data_base_mgmt\databases\ Suncor Monitoring\225_Woodstock\Drawing\MXD\Phase 2 CSM\MOERequest\ _225_Ph2CSM_Fig02_APECs.mxd Revised: By: mkirkpatrick Approximate Location of Former Waste Oil and Fuel Oil USTs APEC Description Former presence of a gasoline service station APEC 1/2 and auto repair facility. Fill of unknown origin. PHC impacts to soil and APEC 3 groundwater east of the site property boundary. Presence of a former dry cleaner with potential onpremise dry cleaning APEC 4 activities. Current and historical offsite gasoline service APEC 5 stations and auto repair m 1:500 Notes &( BH3 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N &( BH11 BH207 &( BH5 &( BH20 BH12&( BH BH204 BH205 BH206 &( BH19 HP MW101 BH6 &( BH10 BH13 MW102 MW103 BH7 BH2 BH14 &( BH9 BH202 BH8 BH15 BH16 BH18 MH BH203 &( BH17 HP MW203 MW202 MW201 Norwich Avenue Parkinson Road June Legend &( Former Borehole (1994, 2004) Former Monitoring Well (1994, 2004) Borehole (Stantec, 2011) Monitoring Well (Jacques Whitford, 2007) Hydro Pole Manhole Former Pump Island Former Tank Nest Hydro Tower Site Boundary Former Building Approximate Location of Former Excavation APEC #1/2 APEC #3 APEC #4 APEC #5 Client/Project HRI Holdings Inc. 358 Norwich Avenue Woodstock, Ontario Figure No. 2 Title Site Plan Showing Site Features and Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

55 A BH201 &( BH1 \\cd1004-f01\work_group\01221\active\ _data_base_mgmt\databases\ Suncor Monitoring\225_Woodstock\Drawing\MXD\Phase 2 CSM\MOERequest\ _225_Ph2CSM_Fig03_xSecLocs.mxd Revised: By: mkirkpatrick m 1:500 Notes B &( BH3 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N &( BH11 BH207 &( BH5 &( BH20 BH12&( BH BH204 BH205 BH206 &( BH19 HP MW101 BH6 &( BH10 BH13 MW102 MW103 BH7 BH2 BH14 &( BH9 BH202 BH8 BH15 BH16 BH18 MH B' BH203 &( BH17 A' HP MW203 #0 MW202 MW201 Norwich Avenue Parkinson Road June Legend &( Former Borehole (1994, 2004) Former Monitoring Well (1994, 2004) Borehole (Stantec, 2011) Monitoring Well (Jacques Whitford, 2007) Hydro Pole Manhole #0 Benchmark Former Pump Island Former Tank Nest Hydro Tower Site Boundary Former Building Approximate Location of Former Excavation Client/Project HRI Holdings Inc. 358 Norwich Avenue Woodstock, Ontario Figure No. 3 Title Cross-Section Locations

56 A NORTH A' SOUTH \\cd1004-f01\work_group\01221\active\ _data_base_mgmt\databases\ Suncor Monitoring\225_Woodstock\Drawing\MXD\Phase 2 CSM\MOERequest\ _225_Ph2CSM_Fig04_xSecAA.mxd Revised: By: mkirkpatrick Elevation (m AMSL) TP40(OS 1m) BH201(OS 2m) b TP25(OS 1m) Excavation BH10(OS 1m) TP23(OS 2m) BH13(OS 2m) TP22(OS 2m) MW102(OS 1m) BH14(OS 0m) BH9(OS 0m) MW103(OS 1m) BH202(OS 0m) TP20(OS 0m) BH8(OS 0m) Excavation BH15(OS 1m) MW101(OS 9m) b b m 93 1:250 5x Vertical Exaggeration BH203(OS 1m) TP4(OS 2m) TP2(OS 4m) BH17(OS 1m) Elevation (m AMSL) June Legend (OS m) Sand Test Pit / Borehole / Well ID (Offset) Stratigraphy Water Level (May 29, 2013) Well Screen Ground Surface Asphalt Gravel Sand / Silty Sand Sand and Gravel Sand and Gravel (Fill) Sandy Silt (Fill) Silt Soil Sample Location that met Table 2 SCS Groundwater Sample Location that met Table 2 SCS Notes 1. Assessed elevations based on 2011 survey of 200 series monitoring wells. Elevation of boreholes and test pit locations are assumed elevations based on interpreted 2011 survey that had a temporary benchmark of m. Client/Project Figure No. 4 Title HRI Holdings Inc. 358 Norwich Avenue Woodstock, Ontario Cross-Section A-A'

57 B WEST B' EAST \\cd1004-f01\work_group\01221\active\ _data_base_mgmt\databases\ Suncor Monitoring\225_Woodstock\Drawing\MXD\Phase 2 CSM\MOERequest\ _225_Ph2CSM_Fig05_xSecBB.mxd Revised: By: mkirkpatrick Elevation (m AMSL) TP19(OS 2m) BH207(OS 2m) b BH4(OS 5m) Excavation TP28(OS 6m) BH206(OS 1m) b m 93 1: x Vertical Exaggeration Excavation MW103(OS 1m) BH9(OS 1m) BH202(OS 0m) TP20(OS 4m) b TP21(OS 4m) Property Line Elevation (m AMSL) June Legend (OS m) Sand Test Pit / Borehole / Well ID (Offset) Stratigraphy Water Level (May 29, 2013) Ground Surface Soil Sample Location that met Table 2 SCS Groundwater Sample Location that met Table 2 SCS Asphalt Sand and Gravel (Fill) Topsoil Sand and Gravel Sand / Silty Sand Sandy Silt (Fill) Notes 1. Assessed elevations based on 2011 survey of 200 series monitoring wells. Elevation of boreholes and test pit locations are assumed elevations based on interpreted 2011 survey that had a temporary benchmark of m. Client/Project Figure No. 5 Title HRI Holdings Inc. 358 Norwich Avenue Woodstock, Ontario Cross-Section B-B' Well Screen Silt