Livelihood Promotion Through Community Based Organisations (CBOs): Can DAY-NRLM Do It? H.S.Shylendra IRMA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Livelihood Promotion Through Community Based Organisations (CBOs): Can DAY-NRLM Do It? H.S.Shylendra IRMA"

Transcription

1 Livelihood Promotion Through Community Based Organisations (CBOs): Can DAY-NRLM Do It? H.S.Shylendra IRMA

2 Independent Assessment of Design, Strategies, and Impacts of DAY-NRLM IRMA, 2017

3 Introduction Poverty Reduction is the primary focus of SDG 1 and 2 Poverty being multidimensional challenge requires a more holistic approach The past approaches have given mixed, if nor dismal results. Poverty challenge continues especially in rural areas Newer strategies and interventions are being being explored given the past experience DAY-NRLM is one the new flagship programmes towards poverty alleviation

4 DAY-NRLM In existence since 2011, NRLM has adopted multidimensional approach for poverty alleviation. 1. Livelihood approach: Combine diverse interventions like wage employment and self-employment to address extreme and other types of poverty 2. Promote and nurture sustainable community based organisations (CBOs) to universally cover the poor and to unleash their innate abilities for poverty alleviation 3. Provide dedicate professional support and linkages to these CBOs for livelihood promotion effort.

5 Mission statement: To reduce poverty by enabling the poor households to access gainful self-employment and skilled wage employment opportunities, resulting in appreciable improvement in their livelihoods on a sustainable basis, through building strong grassroots institutions of the poor. (GOI nd p.6). Guiding principle of DAY-NRLM: Social mobilization and building strong institutions of the poor is critical for unleashing the innate capabilities of the poor. (ibid, p.6).

6 CBOs and Livelihood NRLM visualizes promoting and nurturing various institutions of the poor comprising self-help groups (SHGs) their federations and other livelihood collectives. These CBOs being refered as Institutions of the poor are envisaged to emerge as universal catalytic agents of poverty reduction.

7 Figure 1: Typical Structure of SHG Federation under DAY-NRLM CLFs VOs SHGs

8 Platforms for collective action based on self-help and mutual co-operation. Building linkages with variety of other support and resource agencies, these institutions would strive towards providing a wide range of services, augmenting in the process capital, skills, employment, productive assets and infrastructure which can help overcome the multiple deprivations and risks faced by the poor.

9 Collectives and Livelihood Can collectives of the poor with all their constraint work towards livelihood promotion? CBOs of NRLM aims at including all types of poor (9 crore)especially women and would like to address both livelihood protection and promotion needs,besides social issues of women Experience of working with various types of collectives and community based organizations to address rural poverty and livelihood issues has at best been mixed in the country. Excessive state control and regulation, elite capture, and absence of linkages have hindered the role of CBOs in the past

10 Requiem for Good Livelihood Collectives Role clarity Go beyond microfinance Livelihood Centric (promoting and pursuing livelihoods like Amul cooperatives) Good governance and professional support Well integrated in terms of functions and linkages Right legal form

11 What are CBOs? CBOs Are peoples collectives which may be formal or informal and working at primary or higher levels on democratic and decentralization basis to address relevant social and economic needs of their members who exercise full or significant control and ownership over these organizations.

12 Objectives, Approach, and Methods To analyse the policy and approaches of DAY- NRLM in promoting and nurturing SHGs, their federations and other collectives To examine the structure and working of CBOs Role in promotion of livelihood Way forward towards promoting livelihood

13 Methodology The Study covered 8 states with varying progress in NRLM implementation Interaction with diverse stakeholders at various levels Multiple methods including survey of 4472 households survey

14 Details No. of districts covered % of total district No. of blocks covered % to total blocks Households mobilized 3,86,18,623 6 % of target HHs Estimated % of total rural households Estimated % of rural BPL households Table 1: Outreach & CBO Formation under DAY-NRLM Total CBOs: 1. Self-Help Groups(SHGs): 2. Village Orgnisations(VOs): 3. Cluster Level Federations(CLFs): 4. Producer Organizations: 32,52,372 1,81,105 15,665 11,297

15 Table 2: Social Composition of DAY-NRLM SHGs 2017 Social Category % of Households % of Predominant SHGs* 1 Scheduled Castes(SC) Scheduled Tribes(ST) Minorities Differently enabled 4 persons Others Elderly Total (Actual) ( ) ( )

16 Figure 1: Typical Structure of SHG Federation under DAY-NRLM CLFs VOs SHGs

17 Table 2: Working of SHGs Details Total 1 Average Size of SHGs % of SHGs reporting member withdrawal 37% 3 % of SHGs with Regular Meetings % of SHGs with regular savings Per member Savings Rs % of SHGs with internal lending % of SHGs with reg repayment in int lending % of SHGs federated into VO % of SHGs received training in SHG Mgment % of SHGs received training in livelihood % of SHGs/ members having membership in producer group/organization 20.65

18 Table 3: VOs- Results from VO Survey Details Total 1 No. of VOs surveyed Average number of SHGs % of ST/SC members on the governing body 4 Average membership fee per SHG 476 (Rs.) 5 % of SHGs saving with VO Average savings per SHG(Rs) 141

19 Table 4: Services/Activities of VOs (% to total) Services Total 1 Savings Credit Insurance SHG-Bank Linkage Facilitation SHG formation Training for SHGs Audit Social issues taken up Legal Counseling Convergences attempted Livelihood Promotion FPOs formed Input Supply

20 Table 5: DAY-NRLM* and SHG Bank Linkage Particulars Total SHGs linked (ALL) (Lakh) DAY-NRLM SHGs linked (Lakh) % of DAY-NRLM SHGs (2/1) Savings per SHG(Rs.) No. of SHGs extended loan (Lakh) % of SHGs extended loan Loan disbursed per SHG (Rs.) SHGs with outstanding loan(lakh) % SHGs with outstanding loan Loan outstanding per SHG (Rs) Average loan per member

21 Table 6: Impact of NRLM Particualars Treatment Control 1. Productive Livestock * 2. Non-Livestock *** 3. Per capita Income No. of Enterprises in Village *** 5. % participating in MGNREGA *** 6. No. of days worked Per capita consum exp *** 8. Per capita savings No. of loans *** 10. No. of formal loans *** 11. Average loan received No. of members migrating **

22 Table7: Problems in SHGs and Support Needed for Livelihoods Details* I. Problems Faced by SHG Members Inadequate loan Loan not available No support for livelihood No timely loan/delay No training given No savings withdrawal Higher interest on Loan 9.87 Internal Conflict 4.86 No proper book keeping 3.04 Leaders dominate 1.81

23 Table8: Support Needed for Livelihoods Details* II. Support Needed for Improving Household Livelihoods Credit Subsidy Credit Training in income generation Employment/Job; Technology (Machines/equipment) Other Subsidy Marketing of your produce Productive Assets 13.98

24 CBOs of NRLM & Livelihood: Conclusion The CBOs of NRLM emerging in a fairly widespread way as platforms for socio-economic change for poor and women Nascent and faced with many challenges in their goal of livelihood generation; long way to go Institutional issues like capacity, autonomy, legality, role clarity yet to be addressed fully. Though diverse activities being pursued but depth is weak; livelihood focus /activities very limited and sporadic Largely microfinance focused; impact so far is largely what microfinance can do or enable (more of livelihood protection than promotion) The required professional support for LH promotion and linkages is found to be very weak; The required professional support for LH promotion and linkages is found to be very weak;

25 Way forward Institutional issues like legality and integration needs to resolved while federating Role clarity about CBOs in different tiers in the structure: MF or Livelihood or both? Need for professional support for large scale livelihood generation Ensure inclusion for PoP as CBO can give protection ( social security and wage employment) Ensure access to resources and productive assets to the CBOs under the mission both for capacity building and livelihood promotion Banks must do well to link with SHGs; no better option (though second best)

26 Thanks