Marine Cargo Handling

Transcription

1 Marine Cargo Handling Industry Snapshot Emsi Q Data Set August 2018 Georgia Power 75 Fi h Street NW Suite 175 Atlanta, Georgia Emsi Q Data Set Page 1/9

2 Parameters Industries Code Descrip on Marine Cargo Handling Naviga onal Services to Shipping Regions 29 items selected. See Appendix A for details. Timeframe Datarun Employees Emsi Q Data Set Page 2/9

3 2 Transporta on and Warehousing in 29 ZIPs Industry Summary for 2 Transporta on and Warehousing % $38,271 Jobs (2017) % Change ( ) Avg. Earnings Per Job (2017) 985% above Na onal average Na on: +4.0% Na on: $91,029 Industry Detail Payrolled Business Loca ons (2017) N/A for ZIP Code Regions Jobs Mul plier 1 Unemployed Only Available for 2-Digit Regional Trends Region 2018 Jobs 2023 Jobs Change % Change A Region % B Georgia 4,451 4, % C United States 79,334 82,527 3, % Emsi Q Data Set Page 3/9

4 Occupa ons Employed by these Industries Descrip on Employed in Industry Group (2017) % of Total Jobs in Industry Group (2017) Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand % Sailors and Marine Oilers % Industrial Truck and Tractor Operators % Tank Car, Truck, and Ship Loaders % Crane and Tower Operators % Industry Requirements Purchases from In-region Purchases Imported Purchases Total Purchases Couriers and Express Delivery Services $1,905,202 $3,180,623 $5,085,825 Freight Transporta on Arrangement $562,431 $1,628,120 $2,190,551 US Postal Service $921,148 $806,292 $1,727,440 General Warehousing and Storage $1,228,282 $419 $1,228,700 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices $38,276 $975,227 $1,013,504 Emsi Q Data Set Page 4/9

5 Top Regional Businesses Business Name Industry Name Business Size Kinder Morgan Nassau Terminals Port Of Fernandina Seatow Brunswick Parry Marine Llc Island Construc ons Llc Marine Cargo Handling (488320) Marine Cargo Handling (488320) Naviga onal Services to Shipping (488330) Naviga onal Services to Shipping (488330) Naviga onal Services to Shipping (488330) Business Data by DatabaseUSA.com is third-party data provided by Emsi to its customers as a convenience, and Emsi does not endorse or warrant its accuracy or consistency with other published Emsi data. Emsi Q Data Set Page 5/9

6 Appendix A - Regions Code Descrip on Crescent, GA (in McIntosh county) Darien, GA (in McIntosh county) Midway, GA (in Liberty county) Riceboro, GA (in Liberty county) Townsend, GA (in McIntosh county) Brunswick, GA (in Glynn county) Brunswick, GA (in Glynn county) Saint Simons Island, GA (in Glynn county) Brunswick, GA (in Glynn county) Brunswick, GA (in Glynn county) Brunswick, GA (in Glynn county) Jekyll Island, GA (in Glynn county) Hoboken, GA (in Brantley county) Hortense, GA (in Brantley county) Jesup, GA (in Wayne county) Kings Bay, GA (in Camden county) Kingsland, GA (in Camden county) Nahunta, GA (in Brantley county) Saint Marys, GA (in Camden county) Sea Island, GA (in Glynn county) Waverly, GA (in Camden county) Waynesville, GA (in Brantley county) White Oak, GA (in Camden county) Woodbine, GA (in Camden county) Callahan, FL (in Nassau county) Fernandina Beach, FL (in Nassau county) Emsi Q Data Set Page 6/9

7 32041 Yulee, FL (in Nassau county) Yulee, FL (in Nassau county) Jacksonville, FL (in Duval county) Emsi Q Data Set Page 7/9

8 Appendix B - Data Sources and Calcula ons Industry Data Emsi industry data have various sources depending on the class of worker. (1) For QCEW Employees, Emsi primarily uses the QCEW (Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages), with supplemental es mates from County Business Pa erns. (2) Non- QCEW employees data are based on a number of sources including QCEW, Current Employment Sta s cs, County Business Pa erns, BEA State and Local Personal Income reports, the Na onal Industry-Occupa on Employment Matrix (NIOEM), the American Community Survey, and Railroad Re rement Board sta s cs. (3) Self-Employed and Extended Proprietor classes of worker data are primarily based on the American Community Survey, Nonemployer Sta s cs, and BEA State and Local Personal Income Reports. Projec ons for QCEW and Non-QCEW Employees are informed by NIOEM and long-term industry projec ons published by individual states. Input-Output Data The input-output model in this report is Emsi's gravita onal flows mul -regional social account matrix model (MR-SAM). It is based on data from the Census Bureau's Current Popula on Survey and American Community Survey; as well as the Bureau of Economic Analysis' Na onal Income and Product Accounts, Input-Output Make and Use Tables, and Gross State Product data. In addi on, several Emsi in-house data sets are used, as well as data from Oak Ridge Na onal Labs on the cost of transporta on between coun es. Staffing Pa erns Data The staffing pa ern data in this report are compiled from several sources using a specialized process. For QCEW and Non- QCEW Employees classes of worker, sources include Occupa onal Employment Sta s cs, the Na onal Industry-Occupa on Employment Matrix, and the American Community Survey. For the Self-Employed and Extended Proprietors classes of worker, the primary source is the American Community Survey, with a small amount of informa on from Occupa onal Employment Sta s cs. DatabaseUSA.com Business-Level Data Data for individual businesses is provided by DatabaseUSA.com, which maintains a database of more than 14 million U.S. business en es. Note that in aggregate it will not be consistent with Emsi labor market data due to differences in defini ons, methodology, coverage, and industry/geographic classifica on. State Data Sources This report uses state data from the following agencies: Alabama Department of Industrial Rela ons; Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development; Arizona Department of Administra on, Office of Employment and Popula on Sta s cs; Arkansas Department of Workforce Services; California Labor Market Informa on Department; Colorado Department of Labor and Employment; Connec cut did not provide us with a data source; Delaware Office of Occupa onal and Labor Market Informa on, Delaware Wages 2004; District of Columbia Department of Employment Services; Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; Georgia Department of Labor, Workforce Informa on and Analysis, Occupa onal Informa on Services Unit; Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Rela ons, Research and Sta s cs Office; Idaho Department of Labor; Illinois Department of Employment Security, Employment Projec ons; Indiana Department of Workforce Development; Iowa Workforce Development; Kansas Department of Labor, Labor Market Informa on Services, Kansas Wage Survey; Kentucky Office of Employment and Training; Louisiana Department of Labor; Maine did not provide us with a data source; Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regula on, Office of Labor Market Analysis and Informa on; Massachuse s Execu ve Office of Labor and Workforce Development; Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth, Bureau of Labor Market Informa on and Strategic Ini a ves; Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development; Mississippi Department of Employment Security; Missouri Department of Economic Development; Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Research and Analysis Bureau; Nebraska Workforce Development; Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilita on, Informa on Development and Processing Division, Research and Analysis Bureau; New Hampshire Department of Employment Security; New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development; New Mexico Department of Labor, Emsi Q Data Set Page 8/9

9 Bureau of Economic Research and Analysis; New York Department of Labor, Division of Research and Sta s cs; North Carolina Department of Commerce, Labor and Economic Analysis Division; North Dakota Job Service, Labor Market Informa on Center; Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Labor Market Informa on Division; Oklahoma Employment Security Commission; Oregon Employment Department, Oregon Labor Market Informa on System; Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, Center for Workforce Informa on and Analysis; Rhode Island did not provide us with a data source; South Carolina Employment Security Commission, Labor Market Informa on Department; South Dakota Department of Labor, Labor Market Informa on Division; Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Research and Sta s cs Division; Texas Workforce Commission; Utah Department of Workforce Services; Vermont did not provide us with a data source; Virginia Employment Commission, Economic Informa on Services; Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch; West Virginia Bureau of Employment Programs, Research Informa on & Analysis Division; Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Bureau of Workforce Informa on; Wyoming Department of Employment, Research and Planning Emsi Q Data Set Page 9/9