NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Acute Services 2011/12. Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Level 1
|
|
- Paul Fields
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Acute Services 2011/12 Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Level 1 October 2011
2 Contents Page 1: Executive Summary 3 Assessment outcome 3 Key findings 5 Overview of assessment outcome 7 2: Assessment Results 8 Standard 1: Governance 8 Standard 2: Competent & Capable Workforce 11 Standard 3: Safe Environment 14 Standard 4: Clinical Care 15 Standard 5: Learning from Experience 20 3: Appendix 24 Contacts 24 The comments and findings of the assessment recorded in this report reflect the opinions of the assessor(s) based on the evidence provided by the organisation in relation to the requirements contained in the relevant standards manual. They should not be read as approval or comment in any other context. Page 2 of 24
3 Executive Summary Assessment Outcome Reference number Organisation assessed Services assessed T164 Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust All services Date of last assessment 27 th October 2009 Assessment date 18 th October and 19 th October 2011 Date next assessment due 17 th October 2013 Standards assessed NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Acute Services 2011/12 Level prior to assessment Level 1 Level applied for Level 1 Level achieved Level 1 Discount awarded 10% The organisation was assessed against five standards each containing ten criteria giving a total of 50 criteria. In order to gain compliance at Level 1 the organisation was required to pass at least 40 of these criteria, with a minimum of seven criteria being passed in each individual standard. The organisation scored as follows: Governance 8/10 Compliant Competent & Capable Workforce 10/10 Compliant Safe Environment 10/10 Compliant Clinical Care 8/10 Compliant Learning from Experience 7/10 Compliant OVERALL COMPLIANCE 43/50 Compliant Detailed scores can be found in the organisation s evidence template which is a separate document that records the evidence reviewed and the compliance awarded at the assessment. An overview of the risk areas covered by the assessment is provided within this report. Those criteria highlighted in green indicate the areas of compliance during Page 3 of 24
4 the assessment. Those criteria highlighted in orange indicate the areas of noncompliance and those criteria not reviewed are highlighted in yellow. Prior to formal assessment the organisation was encouraged to conduct a selfassessment. The organisation s self-assessment results are depicted below and plotted against the actual assessment results. Chart 1: Comparison of the organisation s self-assessment to actual assessment outcome The graph below shows the number of organisations that have achieved compliance at each of the NHSLA assessment levels Number of Organisations Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Not Yet Assessed 23 1 Chart 2: NHSLA acute assessment levels as at 1 st April 2011 Page 4 of 24
5 Key findings Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust achieved a score of 43 out of 50 and will be pleased to retain compliance at Level 1 against the NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Acute Services 2011/12. The body of this report makes some specific recommendations which the organisation should consider along with the following generic comments which are applicable to a range of the documents and evidence seen during the assessment. The evidence template was populated with the organisation s approved Level 1 documentation. However, the links to the documentation were not always accurate or clear. For future assessments the organisation is advised to prepare the evidence template and ensure hyperlinks correctly signpost the assessors to the relevant sections within the evidence. This will assist in reducing any time lost that may affect the assessment of all the criteria. The organisation is advised to ensure that all corporate governance processes are explicitly described in the standards detailed in the organisation s Policy for Policies Version 3.2 (October 2011). This will ensure that staff are aware of, and can comply with, the organisation s requirements when developing and ratifying approved policies and guidance documents. The omission of standardised information in the overarching policy suggests that compliance with corporate governance processes may not be fully embedded across the organisation. As an example the duties section of many of the approved documents presented for review contained a mixture of individual and committee duties. The order in which these are referenced in the various documents is muddled and confusing. In addition the organisation is recommended to consider expanding the process for monitoring compliance within this document as detailed below. Where an approved regional policy has been adopted for local use; the organisation should consider and document the system and process to formally acknowledge acceptance and implementation of this policy locally. As an example the Unified Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Adult Policy, Version 9 (February 2010) has been developed and ratified by South Central Strategic Health Authority in consultation with organisations in the south central region. The organisation has adopted and is tailoring the policy to address specific local requirements. As part of this review, the organisation is advised to document the consultation and ratification process for accepting and informing further updates to address local requirements. In addition, the organisation should consider doublebadging the document to reflect that it is a working document within the strategic health authority region and Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Whilst assessing the Level 1 documents provided there was evidence that the document control processes used within the organisation did not appear to have been adhered to in all circumstances. Many of the approved documents had been recently amended and track changes were still evident within them. The organisation must ensure that the process for the development, consultation and final ratification of approved documentation includes a robust checking process to make sure that all received comments and suggested revisions once agreed, are removed from the Page 5 of 24
6 document before publishing. The organisation should note that converting word documents into PDF format does not automatically remove hidden content. A number of the approved documents assessed contained only minimal descriptions and details of the processes staff were required to follow. The organisation is advised to fully and clearly describe these processes to ensure that staff are able to follow them to manage and reduce risk in the area identified, and to assist the organisation in demonstrating implementation and monitoring at the higher levels of assessment. In addition the majority of documents did not include cross referencing or hyperlinks to additional information to support staff in decision making. Where proforma templates have been developed, the organisation is recommended to attach these as an appendix and provide a reference to them within the approved document. With regard to the sections of the approved documents which describe the process for monitoring compliance with all of the above, the organisation is reminded that this requirement is about the organisation describing how they will monitor compliance with their own processes. It is advisable to introduce a standardised approach to this for all documents and for this to be included and described within the Policy for Policies Version 3.2 (October As a minimum the approved document should be describing the process for monitoring compliance against all of the minimum requirements within the criterion as described within the NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Acute Services 2011/12. Additionally where the monitoring identifies deficiencies the organisation should describe how shortfalls in performance will be addressed and relevant changes implemented. This may be included within the individual approved documents as part of the monitoring process or within the terms of reference of the reviewing committee or group charged with the responsibility for the review of monitoring processes. Standardising the way in which the organisation describes the process for monitoring compliance with all of the minimum requirements will support the organisation in working towards compliance at Level 3. There were two pilot criteria at Level 1 during this financial year, which received a positive score in this assessment. Additionally the organisation was given a positive score for one criterion that was deemed compliant to the services provided: 2.4 Supervision of Medical Staff in Training. Page 6 of 24
7 Overview of assessment outcome Compliant Non-compliant Not reviewed 1 Risk Management Strategy Corporate Induction Secure Environment Patient Information & Consent Clinical Audit 2 Policy on Procedural Documents Local Induction of Permanent Staff Slips, Trips & Falls (Staff & Others) Health Record-Keeping Standards Incident Reporting 3 Risk Management Committee(s) Local Induction of Temporary Staff Slips, Trips & Falls (Patients) Screening Procedures Concerns/Complaints 4 Risk Awareness Training for Senior Management Supervision of Medical Staff in Training Moving & Handling Diagnostic Testing Procedures Claims 5 Risk Management Process Risk Management Training Inoculation Incidents Medicines Management Investigations 6 Risk Register Training Needs Analysis Maintenance of Medical Devices & Equipment Transfusion Analysis 7 8 Responding to External Recommendations Specific to the Organisation Health Records Management Medical Devices Training Harassment & Bullying Resuscitation Improvement Hand Hygiene Training Violence & Aggression Venous Thromboembolism Best Practice - NICE 9 Professional Clinical Registration Moving & Handling Training Supporting Staff involved in an Incident, Complaint or Claim Transfer of Patients Best Practice - National Confidential Enquiries/Inquiries 10 Employment Checks Consent Training Stress Discharge of Patients Being Open Page 7 of 24
8 Assessment Results Standard 1: Governance Overview Effective functioning of the board, managerial leadership and accountability, and the organisation s systems and working practices will ensure that quality assurance, quality improvement and patient safety are central to the activities of the healthcare organisation. Organisations should apply the principles of sound corporate governance. Board level responsibility for risk management should be clearly defined and there should also be clear lines of individual accountability for managing risk throughout the organisation leading to the board. Organisations should undertake systematic risk assessment and risk management. Risk management should be fully embedded in the organisation s management processes. All relevant employees, whether permanent or temporary, should be registered with the appropriate professional body and have undergone the required employment checks prior to working within the organisation. A score of eight out of ten was awarded in this standard. Criterion Policy on Procedural Documents documented process for developing organisation-wide procedural documents. Non-compliant c. consultation process g. associated documents h. supporting references i. process for monitoring compliance with all of the above The Policy for Policies, Version 3.2 (October 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Unfortunately all the comments and suggestions submitted as part of the revision of this document had not been removed before sharing. This suggests that the process for robust document control is not embedded in the organisation. As this is a key corporate governance document that sets the Page 8 of 24
9 Criterion Risk Awareness Training for Senior Management documented process for delivering risk management awareness training for all board members and senior managers. Non-compliant standard for all other corporate governance processes, it is imperative that the organisation s requirements and local standards are clearly and accurately reflected in this document. This will ensure a consistent approach to corporate governance processes across the organisation. In addition, the proforma templates referred to in the main body of the document were not attached in the appendices as stated and many associated documents were not hyperlinked. The organisation is advised to reference and hyperlink all associated documents so that staff can easily access documents located elsewhere such as the local intranet. Furthermore, the organisation is advised to review the references to associated external documents. This policy was amended in October 2011 but unfortunately still contains a reference to the Healthcare Commission which is no longer a legal entity. Therefore, on this occasion, compliance could not be awarded. For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. c. process for following up non-attendance Two documents were presented for review in support of this criterion: The Risk Management Policy, Version 2 (August 2011) and the Learning and Development Policy, Version 8 (October 2011). Compliance could not be awarded for this criterion as the process to follow up individual board members and senior managers who do not attend or receive relevant risk awareness training is not explicit. The Learning and Development Policy, Version 8 (October 2011) details a single process to follow up those individuals who do not attend risk awareness training that is applicable to all staff groups. Within this process, it is clear that individual non-attendance is escalated to managers and directors to action. However, the process to distinguish the requirements to follow up Page 9 of 24
10 Criterion Professional Clinical Registration documented process for ensuring that all clinical staff (temporary and permanent) are registered with the appropriate professional body. Compliant those senior managers and board members who do not attend risk awareness training is not explicit. The organisation is advised to expand the process to specifically address the follow up of senior managers and board members who do not attend risk management training, d. process in place for following up those permanent clinical staff who fail to satisfy the validation of registration process Compliance was awarded for this criterion, however the organisation is advised to include within the Registration with Professional Regulatory Bodies Policy and Procedure, Version 4 (March 2011) all relevant professional regulators in addition to the General Medical Council. Page 10 of 24
11 Standard 2: Competent & Capable Workforce Overview The organisation has a responsibility to deliver a safe service to patients by ensuring all staff are appropriately skilled. To ensure that both temporary and permanent staff are adequately equipped to work in a healthcare environment and provide care to patients they must receive training and support, both on initial appointment and on an ongoing basis. By ensuring effective, ongoing training and support, the organisation is promoting the delivery of high quality focused care as well as facilitating staff safety and wellbeing. A score of ten out of ten was awarded in this standard. Key findings and recommendations Criterion Corporate Induction documented process for ensuring the corporate induction arrangements for all new permanent staff. Compliant e. process for following up those who fail to attend corporate induction The Learning and Development Policy, Version 8 (October 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Compliance was awarded for this criterion, however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The approved document states that responsibility for making sure permanent staff attend and complete corporate induction is delegated to managers. However the process to make sure that staff are booked to attend corporate induction within stated timescales is not explicit. Whilst responsibility for following up those individuals who do not complete induction is delegated to managers at a local level, there is no end point to the process. The organisation is advised to review the approved document and processes to ensure that all new permanent staff attend and complete corporate induction and the process for following up on non-attendance is developed to include a final end process. Page 11 of 24
12 Criterion Local Induction of Temporary Staff documented process for ensuring the local induction arrangements for all temporary staff Supervision of Medical Staff in Training Consent Training documented process for managing the risks Compliant Compliant Compliant For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. b. minimum content of local induction programme(s) c. process for checking that all temporary staff complete local induction The Learning and Development Policy, Version 8 (October 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Compliance was awarded for this criterion, however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The organisation has developed proforma checklists to ensure temporary staff complete local induction. The organisation is recommended to consider including an additional column so that checklists are completed with signatures against each area requiring completion during local induction. The timescales for completing local induction detailed in the approved document is the same for all staff, whether permanent or temporary. The organisation is advised to consider amending the timescales specified for temporary staff to make sure that all temporary staff comply with the process of completing the local induction checklist within realistic and restrictive timescales. a. For this criterion the assessment team take assurance from the organisation's compliance with the General Medical Council (GMC) requirements for supervision as determined by the evidence available to the GMC. The organisation was successful in meeting the Level 1 requirements and therefore compliance has been awarded. d. process for following up those who have obtained consent for a procedure without being authorised to do so This is a pilot minimum requirement for 2011/12 and as such a positive score Page 12 of 24
13 Criterion associated with consent training. has been awarded. In order to test the validity of the minimum requirement organisations were encouraged to provide evidence. Whilst compliance has automatically been awarded the organisation may wish to consider the following points. The Policy and Guidelines for Consent to Examination or Treatment, Version 7 (September 2011) does not clearly describe the process for following up those staff who obtain consent when they have not been authorised to do so. The organisation is advised to review its approved document to ensure that this includes a clear process that staff must follow to reduce the risk area identified. For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. Page 13 of 24
14 Standard 3: Safe Environment Overview It is essential to provide a safe and secure environment in order to facilitate high quality clinical care. The environment should be safe for staff, patients and their visitors in order to prevent accidents, injury and disease. Risk of violence, bullying, harassment, and stress should be managed and minimised and the workplace should be one in which both patient and staff safety is managed sensibly and effectively. A score of ten out of ten was awarded in this standard. Key findings and recommendations Criterion Harassment & Bullying documented process for managing the risks associated with the harassment and/or bullying of staff. Compliant c. process for raising concerns about harassment and/or bullying Compliance was awarded for this criterion, however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The organisation is advised to review the Dignity At Work Policy, Version 3 (August 2011) to include an additional sentence in the main body of the document to reflect the process for raising concerns about harassment and/or bullying when it is the line manager who is the alleged perpetrator. This will ensure consistency of the process within the document and the flowchart provided in Appendix C. Page 14 of 24
15 Standard 4: Clinical Care Overview The care provided within a clinical environment should be of the highest quality and practiced to the safest level. To support this, robust guidance should be in place for all clinical care procedures. Some of the higher volume and higher risk processes have been selected for assessment by the NHSLA, namely: consent, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, medicines management and resuscitation. Care should be provided in such a way as to minimise the risk to patients of misidentification and treatment. It is particularly important to ensure patients have clear information when undergoing procedures and that accurate information is shared between all professionals in all care environments. To underpin these care processes, systematic approaches must be in place to ensure there is effective communication between staff, patients and others and that high standards of record keeping are consistent across the organisation. A score of eight out of ten was awarded in this standard. Key findings and recommendations Criterion Patient Information & Consent documented process for providing information to patients and managing risks associated with consent. Non-compliant e. archiving arrangements for information given to patients f. process for monitoring compliance with all of the above The Policy and Guidelines for Consent to Examination or Treatment, Version 7 (September 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Compliance could not be awarded for this criterion because the process described relates solely to consent procedures and the ability to destroy patient identifiable information. The organisation did not provide any information on the process for archiving information that is given to patients Similarly the process for monitoring compliance only referred to consent information. The organisation should note that for this criterion organisations must demonstrate an approved documented process for managing risks associated with all methods of providing and archiving information for Page 15 of 24
16 Criterion Screening Procedures documented process for developing local policies to manage the risks associated with screening procedures Diagnostic Testing Procedures documented process for developing local policies to manage the risks associated with diagnostic testing procedures Medicines Management documented process for managing the risks associated with medicines in all care environments. Compliant Compliant Non-compliant patients. For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. This is a pilot criterion for 2011/12 and as such a positive score has been awarded. In order to test the validity of the criterion organisations were encouraged to provide evidence for each of the minimum requirements. Whilst compliance has automatically been awarded the organisation did not provide any documentation for review. This is a pilot criterion for 2011/12 and as such a positive score has been awarded. In order to test the validity of the criterion organisations were encouraged to provide evidence for each of the minimum requirements. Whilst compliance has automatically been awarded the organisation did not provide any documentation for review. b. process for ensuring the accuracy of all prescription charts The Medicines Management Policy, Version 5.2 (July 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. The approved document is very large and unwieldy with many attachments. The organisation is advised to consider whether it is practical to have so much information in one document and whether staff can access key information as required in a practical and timely manner. The content in the document should provide detailed but succinct information for staff with clear signposting for ease of finding. In this way, the organisation can be assured that staff are able to comply with the standards set in local policies and guidelines to mitigate against the risk areas identified. Staff representatives verbally explained the process by which pharmacists Page 16 of 24
17 Criterion reconcile the accuracy of prescription charts. The process is not clearly described in the approved document, although reference is made to the Medicines Reconciliation Policy in the main body of the document. The Medicines Reconciliation Policy was not presented for review. Appendix J within the approved document is an example of a template document for recording daily ward communications between pharmacists and ward staff. Although there is a space on the template to add the bleep number of the attending pharmacist; the organisation is advised to include a space on this template so that the signature of the attending pharmacist can also be added to the document. In this way, clear and irrefutable evidence of the attending pharmacist can be assured. e. procedure for the safe disposal of all drugs The approved document clearly describes the process for the disposal of controlled drugs. However, the process for the disposal of all other drugs is not clearly described in the approved document, although there are brief references to the disposal of patient s own medication. Staff representatives verbally explained that all drugs and medication must be returned to the pharmacy department for disposal and that there is a separate policy which details the processes for the disposal of all drugs. Unfortunately this policy was not referred to in the approved document presented for review and therefore the assessor could not be assured that the organisation has a robust process for the safe disposal of all drugs. The organisation must ensure that all associated documents are referenced and signposted appropriately within the overarching approved document. For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. f. organisation s expectations in relation to staff training, as identified in the training needs analysis The approved document states Training will be given in accordance with the Trust s Risk Management Training Needs Analysis and uptake will be Page 17 of 24
18 Criterion Transfusion documented process for managing the risks associated with the transfusion process. Compliant monitored by Pharmacy. The organisation s training needs analysis identifies those staff groups who are required to undertake generic medicines management training as part of the mandatory training programme. Staff representatives confirmed that the bespoke training that pharmacists must complete to maintain their competence is recorded locally in paper format. Staff from the learning and development department explained the process currently underway to expand the information recorded on the organisational training needs analysis, which will record additional mandatory training for pharmacy staff. However, the separate locally held paper based record for pharmacy staff training does not currently link into the centrally held record and so it is unclear how the organisation is assured that all pharmacy staff are up to date with training requirements and competent in their daily practice. Furthermore there is no mention of locally held training records within the approved document. The organisation is advised to review and update the approved document to record and accurately reflect the processes currently in practice and continue to review the underpinning policy documents as the processes for recording training centrally evolve. Therefore compliance could not be awarded. e. organisation s expectations in relation to staff training, as identified in the training needs analysis Compliance was awarded for this criterion; however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The organisation s training needs analysis (TNA) identifies blood transfusion as a mandatory training requirement. However, it is not clear from the TNA which staff are expected to attend and complete the training or how frequently attendance for this training is required. The organisation is advised to review and amend the TNA to reflect the training requirements for specific staff as described in the Blood Transfusion Policy For The Administration Of Page 18 of 24
19 Criterion Blood And Blood Products, Version 6 (April 2011). Page 19 of 24
20 Standard 5: Learning from Experience Overview All organisations should have in place robust systems for the reporting, management and investigation of adverse events (incidents), ill health and hazards, including those that result in no harm, which will help to facilitate organisational learning. Organisations should apologise and explain what happened to patients who have been harmed as a result of their healthcare treatment. Concerns, complaints and claims, when examined in conjunction with all reported adverse events, allow trends to be identified at both a local and strategic level and changes to be implemented. This can reduce the recurrence of incidents, claims and complaints. The sharing of lessons learned from one service to other areas of the organisation helps to ensure that any system failures discovered during investigations are addressed by the organisation as a whole and pockets of good practice are not isolated. Organisations should consider and implement appropriate external guidance to ensure the organisation is operating as safely as possible. A score of seven out of ten was awarded in this standard. Key findings and recommendations Criterion Concerns/Complaints documented process for listening, responding and improving when patients, their relatives and carers raise concerns/complaints. Compliant c. process for the handling of joint complaints between organisations e. process by which the organisation aims to improve as a result of concerns/complaints being raised Compliance was awarded for this criterion; however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The Complaints Policy, Version 4.1 (June 2011) contained only minimal descriptions and details of the processes staff were required to follow to reduce the risk area identified. The organisation must ensure that its approved document provides clear, detailed information and processes for staff in order for them to comply with organisational requirements Claims Compliant d. communication with relevant stakeholders Page 20 of 24
21 Criterion documented process for managing all claims in accordance with NHSLA requirements Investigations documented process for investigating all incidents, complaints and claims. Non-compliant Compliance was awarded for this criterion; however, the organisation is advised to note the following comment: The Litigation And Inquests Policy, Version 1 (October 2011) makes reference to communication with local stakeholders such as the Strategic Health Authority and Primary Care Trust. The organisation is advised to consider whether any other relevant local or national stakeholders may need to be included in the description of communication with all relevant stakeholders and if appropriate, amend the approved document accordingly. a. duties b. organisation s expectations in relation to staff training, as identified in the training needs analysis c. different levels of investigation appropriate to the severity of the event(s) Compliance could not be awarded for this criterion. The Incident Reporting Policy and Procedure, Version 7 (August 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Staff representatives confirmed that the approved policy is the overarching policy for investigating all incidents, complaints and claims. Unfortunately the processes detailed in the approved document relate in the main to the investigation of incidents. Whilst a reference to the investigation of complaints and claims is implied, the distinct processes for investigating complaints and claims are muddled and not clearly described within the approved document. In addition the duties and training requirements described in the approved document do not clearly describe and differentiate the specific requirements for the investigation of complaints and claims. The organisation is strongly recommended to review the approved documentation for investigating incidents, complaints and claims to ensure that the processes for investigating all events are specific, clearly described and include the different levels of investigation required dependent on the event that has occurred. The organisation must ensure that all associated Page 21 of 24
22 Criterion Improvement documented process for encouraging learning and promoting improvements in practice, based on individual and aggregated analysis of incidents, complaints and claims Best Practice National Confidential Enquiries/Inquiries documented process for ensuring that agreed best practice, as defined in National Confidential Enquiries/Inquiries, is taken into account in the context of the clinical services provided by the organisation. Non-compliant Non-compliant documents are referenced and signposted appropriately within the overarching approved document. For further comments regarding the issues identified please review the key findings section on page 5 of this report. d. process for implementing risk reduction measures The Procedure For The Systematic Analysis And Reporting Of Incidents, Near Misses, Complaints and Litigation, Version 1 (October 2011) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Unfortunately, compliance could not be awarded for this criterion as the process for implementing risk reduction measures was not explicitly described within the approved document. The organisation must ensure that the approved document clearly describes the processes being implemented to make sure they provide clarity for all staff. e. process for conducting an organisational gap analysis f. process for ensuring that recommendations are acted upon throughout the organisation g. process for documenting any decision not to implement National Confidential Enquiry/Inquiry recommendations The National Service Frameworks, National Confidential And Other High Level Enquiry Policy, Version 2.1 (May 2009) was the approved document reviewed in support of this criterion. Unfortunately, compliance could not be awarded for this criterion as the processes for conducting an organisational gap analysis, acting upon recommendations and documenting decisions with regard to National Confidential Enquiries/Inquiries was not clearly described within the approved Page 22 of 24
23 Criterion document. The organisation must ensure that the approved documents clearly describe the processes being implemented to make sure they to provide clarity for all staff. Page 23 of 24
24 Appendix Contacts Assessment/Report enquiries This report was prepared by Det Norske Veritas on behalf of the NHS Litigation Authority. Any queries regarding this report should be directed to: General enquiries Address for correspondence: NHSLA general enquiries General enquiries Risk management enquiries Address for correspondence: Website Det Norske Veritas Highbank House Exchange Street Stockport Cheshire SK3 0ET The NHS Litigation Authority 151 Buckingham Palace Road Westminster London SW1W 9SZ Page 24 of 24
NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Community Services 2011/12
NHSLA Risk Management Standards for NHS Trusts Providing Community Services 2011/12 Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust Provider of Community and Mental Health Services Level 1 May 2011 Contents Page 1: Executive
More informationIdentifies the risk management structure, roles, responsibilities and authority of staff, committees and groups with responsibility for risk
Title Description of document The sets out the process by which the Trust identifies, manages, reduces and mitigates risks to achieving the organisational objectives. It sets out the framework required
More informationManual Handling Policy
Manual Handling Policy Policy Title: Executive Summary: Manual handling policy The purpose of the policy is to describe the necessary arrangements required for the trust to comply with current legislation
More informationHEALTH AND SAFETY STRATEGY
HEALTH AND SAFETY STRATEGY 2016-2019 Version: 1.0 Ratified by: Integrated Governance Committee Date ratified: 30 September 2015 Title of originator/author: Title of responsible committee/group: Head of
More informationTRUST GOVERNANCE POLICY (formerly referenced as the CMFT Governance Strategy) - UPDATED NOVEMBER
Review Circulation Application Ratification Originator or modifier Supersedes Title CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST TRUST GOVERNANCE POLICY (formerly referenced as the CMFT
More informationRisk Management Strategy
RM02 Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LPFT) Risk Management Strategy Document Type and Title: Authorised Document Folder: New or Replacing: Document Reference: DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Strategy
More informationRisk Management and Assurance Strategy
Risk Management and Assurance Strategy Version 5.0 Policy number ULHT-MD-GOV-RM-STRAT Document author(s) Head of 2021 Programme Contributor(s) Approved by Policy Approval Group Date approved Date Published
More informationINTEGRATED GOVERNANCE STRATEGY
INTEGRATED GOVERNANCE STRATEGY Policy Profile Version: Version 1.0 (March 2012) Date: January 2012 Review date: January 2015 Author: Lead Director: Operational Leads for Governance Barbara Campbell Irene
More informationDevelopment and Management of Procedural Documents Policy
Development and Management of Procedural Documents Policy The 5 key messages the reader should note about this document are: 1. Procedural Documents are important within any organisation. They are an essential
More informationTRUST-WIDE NON-CLINICAL POLICY DOCUMENT. Date Ratified: February 2015 Next Review Date (by): Interim Review August 2017 Version Number: 2015 Version 1
TRUST-WIDE NON-CLINICAL POLICY DOCUMENT Policy Number: Scope of this Document: Recommending Committee: Appproving Committee: SA01 All Staff Policy Group Executive Committee Date Ratified: February 2015
More informationFor: Information Assurance Discussion and input Decision/approval. Ellen Bull, Deputy Director of Quality Author Contact Details: 3531
Trust Board Item: 15 Date: 07/02/2018 Purpose of the Report: Enclosure: K To request ratification from the Trust Board of Directors on the. which was discussed, refined and approved at the Risk Management
More informationRisk Management Strategy, Policy and Guidance
Risk Management Strategy, Policy and Guidance 11.0 Risk Management EQUALITY IMPACT The Trust strives to ensure equality of opportunity for all both as a major employer and as a provider of health care.
More informationGOVERNANCE STRATEGY October 2013
GOVERNANCE STRATEGY October 2013 1. Introduction 1.1. The Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust believes that the role of the governing body is pivotal to the success of the Trust.
More informationExecutive Director of Workforce and Organisational Development. Workforce Projects Manager. Date ratified January Implementation Date
Document Title Reference Number Lead Officer Author(s) Ratified by Induction Policy NTW(HR)01 Lisa Crichton-Jones Executive Director of Workforce and Organisational Development Jacqueline Tate Workforce
More informationSolihull Metropolitan Borough Council. Corporate Health and Safety Policy For Core Council Staff. September 2015
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Corporate Health and Safety Policy For Core Council Staff Version Control: September 2015 Version Date Author Sent to Reason 1.1 June 2015 Steve Dean ( Health and
More informationPOLICY ON MANAGING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
POLICY ON MANAGING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS Version: 6 Date Ratified: February 2017 Review Date: February 2020 Applies to: Senior Managers and staff who produce procedural documents.
More informationOrganisational Learning Policy
Policy Authors Name & Title: Dr Mark Jackson, Director of Research & Informatics Scope: Trust Wide Classification: Non-Clinical Replaces: v1.4 To be read in conjunction with the following documents: Risk
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION AND PERSON SPECIFICATION
Final Copy JE REF No: 1413 JOB DESCRIPTION AND PERSON SPECIFICATION Job Title: Administrator/Co-ordinator BAND: 3 REPORTS TO: Supervisor/Manager JOB SUMMARY To provide a full administration/co-ordination
More informationExternal Audit: Annual Audit Letter
INFRASTRUCTURE, GOVERNMENT AND HEALTHCARE External Audit: Annual Audit Letter 2005-06 Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust September 2006 AUDIT Content The contacts at KPMG in connection with this
More informationUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust. Governance Statement 2015/16. Scope of responsibility. The governance framework of the organisation
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust Governance Statement 2015/16 Scope of responsibility As Accountable Officer, and Chief Executive of this Board, I have responsibility for maintaining a sound system
More informationDudley & Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Board
Dudley & Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Board Date of Board Meeting: 27 May 2009 Subject: Trust Board Lead: Presented by: Aim of the report: Risk Management Strategy Rosie Musson Head of Governance
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Agenda Item No: 15 RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY PURPOSE: The Risk Management Strategy has been updated to reflect the revised approach to the Corporate Risk Register and Board Assurance Framework and to reflect
More informationSuspension, Exclusion or Transfer Policy
Suspension, Exclusion or Transfer Policy Solent NHS Trust Policies can only be considered to be valid and up-to-date if viewed on the intranet. Please visit the intranet for the latest version. Purpose
More informationThe purpose of this document is to outline the processes for mandatory training within the Trust.
Trust Policy and Procedure Document ref. no: PP(16)244 Policy and procedure for Mandatory and Statutory training For use in: For use by: For use for: Document owner: Status: Trust Wide All staff and temporary
More informationSLIPS, TRIPS AND FALLS POLICY FOR EMPLOYEES
SLIPS, TRIPS AND FALLS POLICY FOR EMPLOYEES To be read in conjunction with the Health & Safety Policy, Uniform Policy & Patient Falls Policy Document Type H&S Policy Unique Identifier HS-016 Document Purpose
More informationResearch Governance Policy and Procedure
Research Governance Policy and Procedure Version: 5 Name of originator/author: Name of executive lead: Date ratified: Review date: APPLICABLE TO: All staff. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dr Lisa Austin- University
More informationRisk Assessment Procedure
Risk Assessment Procedure Version: 1.1 Ratified by (Committee) : EMG Date ratified: 06.05.14 Name of originator/author: Developed in association with: Catherine McGowan Workplace Law Name of executive
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Version 2.0 Page 1 of 9 OCTOBER 2013 POLICY DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL CERTIFICATE TITLE Title: Risk Management Strategy Version: 2.0 SUPERSEDES Supersedes: Risk Management Strategy
More informationTrust Policy Supply Chain Inventory Management Policy (SC010)
Trust Policy Supply Chain Inventory Management Policy (SC010) Purpose Date Version 16/09/16 1 The purpose of this Supply Chain Inventory Management Policy is to identify the relevant Standard Operating
More informationControlled Document Number: Version Number: 7 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:
Policy for the Development and Management of Controlled Documents CONTROLLED DOCUMENT CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION: PURPOSE: Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 7 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled
More informationQuality, Safety & Risk Management Framework Policy and Procedure Policy Number 023
Title: Quality Safety Management Document Control Policy Title Quality, Safety & Management Framework Policy Number 023 Owner Quality, Compliance & Training Manager Contributors Quality, Compliance & Training
More informationRisk Management Strategy
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Strategy Strategy NHS GREATER GLASGOW & CLYDE Issue date: April 2007 Version: 1. Custodian: Head of Clinical Governance Status: Approved Review Interval: Two years 1 of 11 NHS
More informationThe Kirkup report. Governance Project Mary Aubrey, Director of Governance May 2015
The Kirkup report Governance Project Mary Aubrey, Director of Governance May 2015 The Governance Project group The Governance Project group Communication plan PLANNING PHASE Meetings held with the Heads
More informationPolicy for the Development, Approval, Management and Dissemination of Trust Controlled Documents
J Policy for the Development, Approval, Management and Dissemination of Trust Controlled Documents Reference Number Version Status Executive Lead(s) Name and Job Title Author(s) Name and Job Title 55 6
More informationSCOTTISH AMBULANCE SERVICE JOB DESCRIPTION
SCOTTISH AMBULANCE SERVICE JOB DESCRIPTION REF: 1. Job Details Job Title: Directorate: Reports to: Integrated Transport Co-ordinator Operations Integrated Transport Supervisor 2. Job Purpose To provide
More informationINFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY. Documentation control
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY Documentation control Reference Date Approved Approving Body Version Supersedes Consultation Undertaken Target Audience Supporting procedures GG/INF/01 TRUST BOARD Information
More informationPolicy:E7. Escalation Policy N/A. Appended below at Appendix B. Version: E7/01
Policy:E7 Escalation Policy Version: E7/01 Ratified by: Trust Management Team Date ratified: 11 th September 2013 Title of Author: Board Secretary & Head of Governance Title of responsible Director Medical
More informationVersion: 4.0. Training Policy for Medical Devices. Name of Policy: Effective From: 24/10/2012
Policy No: RM45 Version: 4.0 Name of Policy: Training Policy for Effective From: 24/10/2012 Date Ratified 07/08/2012 Ratified Management Group Review Date 01/08/2014 Sponsor Director of Estates and Facilities
More informationHealth and Safety Strategy
Health and Safety Strategy Published: December 2016 Find us online at cornwallft 1. Introduction Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CFT) has very clear responsibilities for staff, patients, visitors
More informationYOUR INDUCTION PROCESS & INTRODUCTION TO MANDATORY TRAINING
YOUR INDUCTION PROCESS & INTRODUCTION TO MANDATORY TRAINING Introducing New Staff To The Induction Process for Your Job Role How to Access the Trust s elearning The Trust Mandatory Training Matrix PROCESS
More informationStaff Training and Development Procedure
Staff Training and Development Procedure Version: 8.0 Bodies consulted: Approved by: Recognised Trade Unions and Executive Management Team Executive Management Team Date Approved: September 2018 Lead Manager:
More informationINFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY AND STRATEGIC VISION
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY AND STRATEGIC VISION Policy approved by: Joint Audit and Governance Committee Date: December 2016 Next Review Date: October 2018 Version: 2.0 Information Governance Strategy
More informationHealth, Safety & Wellbeing Policy
Clacton County High School Health, Safety & Wellbeing Policy This Document was originally approved: January 2013 This Document was Last Reviewed: September 2017 This Document is due for review: September
More informationInformation Sharing Policy
Information Sharing Policy DOCUMENT CONTROL: Version: 1 Ratified by: Risk Management Sub Group Date ratified: 19 December 2012 Name of originator/author: Information Governance Manager Name of responsible
More information<Full Name> OHS Manual. Conforms to OHSAS 18001:2007. Revision Date Record of Changes Approved By
Conforms to OHSAS 18001:2007 Revision history Revision Date Record of Changes Approved By 0.0 [Date of Issue] Initial Issue Control of hardcopy versions The digital version of this document
More informationNORTH EAST HAMPSHIRE AND FARNHAM CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP POLICY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF POLICIES AND CORPORATE DOCUMENTS
NORTH EAST HAMPSHIRE AND FARNHAM CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP POLICY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF POLICIES AND CORPORATE DOCUMENTS Document Control Sheet Version 1 Date 22 October 2013 Status Draft Author Justina
More informationActing Up and Secondment Policy and Procedures
Acting Up and Secondment Policy and Procedures Version Number: V2.0 Name of originator/author: Deputy Director of Workforce and Organisational Development Name of responsible committee: JNCC & Trust Management
More informationDATA QUALITY POLICY. Version: 1.2. Management and Caldicott Committee. Date approved: 02 February Governance Lead
DATA QUALITY POLICY Version: 1.2 Approved by: Date approved: 02 February 2016 Name of Originator/Author: Name of Responsible Committee/Individual: Information Governance, Records Management and Caldicott
More informationLevel 3 Diploma in Warehousing and Storage ( )
Level 3 Diploma in Warehousing and Storage (06-07) Candidate logbook 600/3766/0 www.cityandguilds.com January 202 Version.0 About City & Guilds City & Guilds is the UK s leading provider of vocational
More informationAsbestos Management. Final Internal Audit Report 2018/19. Powys Teaching Health Board. NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership
Final Internal Audit Report 2018/19 NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Audit and Assurance Services Reasonable Assurance - + Previous rating: 2012/13 Limited Assurance Report Contents CONTENTS Page
More informationTHE ROYAL MARSDEN WELCOME AND ONBOARDING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
THE ROYAL MARSDEN WELCOME AND ONBOARDING POLICY AND PROCEDURE Summary The Royal Marsden is committed to providing a supportive and robust onboarding programme to enable all new staff to settle into their
More informationBowmer. & Kirkland. Kirkland. & Accommodation. Health & Safety Policy.
Bowmer Kirkland & Kirkland & Accommodation Health & Safety Policy December 2013 www.bandk.co.uk Index Policy Statement Page 3 Interaction of Health and Safety Responsibilities Page 5 Organisation Page
More informationThe Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Aggregating Data and Learning from Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aggregating Data and Learning from Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy Version no. 2.1 Effective from: 2 nd October 2012 Expiry date: 31 st October
More informationLead Employer Flexible Working Policy. Trust Policy
Lead Employer Flexible Working Policy Type of Document Code: Policy Sponsor Lead Executive Recommended by: Trust Policy Deputy Director of Human Resources Director of Human Resources Date Recommended:
More informationCORPORATE & LOCAL INDUCTION POLICY
Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Policy Reference: 123 CORPORATE & LOCAL INDUCTION POLICY Version: 7 Name and designation of policy author(s) Mrs A Callcott, Service Delivery and
More informationThe Role of Chief Social Work Officer. Guidance Issued by Scottish Ministers pursuant to Section 5(1) of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968
The Role of Chief Social Work Officer Guidance Issued by Scottish Ministers pursuant to Section 5(1) of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968 Revision of Guidance First Issued In 2009 Revised Version July
More informationThis Policy supersedes the following Policy, which must now be destroyed:
Document Title Reference Number Lead Officer Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified by Forensic Readiness Policy NTW(O)56 Lisa Quinn, Executive Director of Commissioning and Quality Assurance Angela
More informationColleague HR Policies: Statutory & Mandatory Training Policy
Colleague HR Policies: Statutory & Mandatory Training Policy Date Approved: 5 December 2017 In a nutshell We recognise our responsibilities that all of our colleagues are adequately and properly trained
More informationThis Policy supersedes the following Policy, which must now be destroyed:
Document Title Reference Number Lead Officer Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified by Forensic Readiness Policy NTW(O)56 Lisa Quinn Executive Director of Performance and Assurance Sue Proud Information
More informationINDUCTION POLICY AND PROCEDURE
Summary INDUCTION POLICY AND PROCEDURE New members of staff require an induction period to enable them to settle in to their new place of work. This policy sets out the framework and responsibilities for
More informationINFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY Page 1 of 13 INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key Messages Principles of Information Governance Openness Confidentiality and Legal Compliance Information Security
More informationTraining Statutory and Mandatory
This is an official Northern Trust policy and should not be edited in any way Training Statutory and Mandatory Reference Number: NHSCT/11/444 Target audience: All Trust Staff Sources of advice in relation
More informationInvestigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Management Standard Operating Procedure
Reference Number: UHB 040 Version Number: 3 Date of Next Review: 26 Apr 2019 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: T 363 Standard Operating Procedure Introduction and Aim This procedure is written to support
More informationMoving and Handling Policy
Moving and Handling Policy Ratified Governance and Risk Committee Status Approved Issued August 2014 Approved By Governance and Risk Committee Consultation Governance and Risk Committee Equality
More informationRisk Management Strategy Executive Lead. Kevan Taylor. Policy author/ lead
Risk Management Strategy 2016-2017 Executive Lead Policy author/ lead Feedback on implementation to Kevan Taylor Margaret Saunders, Director of Corporate Governance (Board Secretary) Margaret Saunders,
More informationCLINICAL & PROFESSIONAL SUPERVISION POLICY (replacing 033/Workforce)
CLINICAL & PROFESSIONAL SUPERVISION POLICY (replacing 033/Workforce) POLICY NUMBER 051/Workforce POLICY VERSION 1 RATIFYING COMMITTEE HR Policy Review Group DATE RATIFIED December 2010 NEXT REVIEW DATE
More informationHonorary Contracts Procedure
Honorary Contracts Procedure Version: 3.0 Bodies consulted: Approved by: Joint Staff Consultative Committee & WMT Executive Management Team Date Approved: 03 October 2017 Lead Manager: Responsible Director:
More informationJob Description. Head of Contracting. Deputy Head of Contracting. Senior Contracts Manager. Assistant Contracts Manager
Job Description Job Title: Senior Contract Manager (Primary Care) Reference No: Organisation: NHS Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group Department: System Resources and Performance Team: Contracting
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION per week
JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title Executive Office Administrator Salary Band 3 ( 16,800-19,655) Department Chief Clinical Officer Department Accountable to / Line Manager Executive Assistant to the Chief Clinical
More informationBoard Governance Statements for Self Certification
Board Governance Statements for Self Certification This document sets out compliance with the Monitor Board Statements as detailed in the document Applying for NHS Foundation Trust Status: A Guide for
More informationSponsorship of Clinical Research Studies
Sponsorship of Clinical Research Studies Category: Summary: Equality Impact Assessment undertaken: Policy The UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care 2017 (UKPF) and The Medicines for Human Use
More informationStatutory and Mandatory Training Policy
Statutory and Mandatory Training Policy (including Training Needs Analysis) Author Julie Thornton, Organisational Development Lead Corporate Lead Sue Ellis Director of Workforce Document Version 1 Date
More informationPolicies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Policy on the Development and Management of Procedural Documents (Strategies, Policies, Protocols and Guidelines) Trust Ref No 1361-28127
More informationGUIDANCE ON REFERRAL OF EMPLOYEES TO THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE
GUIDANCE ON REFERRAL OF EMPLOYEES TO THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE Policy Number: 336 Supersedes: All previous guidance Standards For Healthcare Services No/s 22, 26 Version No: 1 Date Of Review: September
More informationStaff Counselling Service
Staff Counselling Service HR66 Additionally refer to : HS01 Health & Safety Policy HR31 Managing Attendance and Employee Wellbeing HR65 Occupational Health Service Version: V1 issued January 2009 V2 approved
More informationJob Description. Operations Manager. Scheduled Care. Band 8A. Centre Manager. Centre Manager
Job Description Job Title: Clinical Group Base Band: Reports To: Accountable To: Key Working Relationships: Operations Manager Scheduled Care The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust Band 8A Centre
More informationThis Policy supersedes the following Policy which must now be destroyed:
Document Title Reference Number Lead Officer Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified by Environmental Sustainability Policy NTW(O)02 Paul McCabe, Head of Estates and Facilities (NTW Solutions Ltd) Sarah
More informationVersion Number: 004. On: June 2018 Review Date: June 2021 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 10
Introduction of Novel Therapeutic Interventions Policy CONTROLLED DOCUMENT CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION: PURPOSE Controlled Number: Document Policy Governance To set out the agreed policy for the submission
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURE JOB EVALUATION POLICY
POLICY AND PROCEDURE JOB EVALUATION POLICY Reference Number: 124 2007 Author / Manager Responsible: Peter Eley, HR Manager & AfC Project Manager Deadline for ratification: (Policy must be ratified within
More informationDOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE. Health and Safety Policy Statement
Review Circulation Application Ratification Originator or modifier Minor Amendment Supersedes Title DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE Title: Health and Safety Policy Statement Version: 5.0 Reference Number: HSP 1
More informationStandards of proficiency. Biomedical scientists
Standards of proficiency Biomedical scientists Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 3 Standards of proficiency 7 Foreword We are pleased to present the Health and Care Professions Council s standards of proficiency
More informationCompetence Framework for Safeguarding Adults
Competence Framework for Safeguarding Adults Introduction This competency framework seeks to develop and demonstrate the competency of staff in delivering services that safeguard adults with care and support
More informationExecutive Director of Nursing and Chief Operating Officer. Lead Officer. Tony Gray Head of Safety, Security and Resilience
Document Title Security Management Policy Reference Number Lead Officer Executive Director of Nursing and Chief Operating Officer Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified By: Tony Gray Head of Safety,
More informationHuman Resources Policy No. HR65
Human Resources Policy No. HR65 Occupational Health Service Additionally refer to: HS01 Health & Safety Policy HR06 Maintaining High Standards of Performance HR07 Disciplinary Policy for Doctors and Dentists
More informationMedical Doctors in Training Induction Policy
Doctors in Training Induction Policy JANUARY 2018 This policy supersedes all previous policies for Doctors Induction Policy Policy title Doctors in training Induction Policy Policy HR02A reference Policy
More informationBury Local Care Organisation Provider Alliance
Job Description Post: Project Manager Band: 6 Location/Base: Responsible to: Main Contacts: Bury Town Centre Senior Programme Manager Bury Local Care Organisation Provider Alliance Job Summary The Project
More informationCCG CO12 Policy and Framework for Partnership Governance
Corporate CCG CO12 Policy and Framework for Partnership Governance Version Number Date Issued Review Date V2: 21/02/2015 29/04/2015 21/02/2018 Prepared By: Consultation Process: Formally Approved: 25/02/2015
More informationInduction Policy. Document author Assured by Review cycle. 1. Introduction Policy Statement Purpose or Aim Scope...
Induction Policy Board library reference Document author Assured by Review cycle P091 Head of Learning and Development Quality and Standards Committee 3 Year This document is version controlled. The master
More informationINFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY Unique Reference / Version Primary Intranet Location Information Management & Governance Secondary Intranet Location Policy Name Information Governance Policy Version Number
More informationRD SOP32 Gaining MHRA Approval
RD SOP32 Gaining MHRA Approval Version Number: 1.0 Name of originator/author: Dr Lloyd Gregory Name of responsible committee: R&I Committee Name of executive lead: Medical Director & Director of Quality
More informationCorporate Governance and Assurance in NHS Lothian (Version 7-30 January 2017) 1. INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION Why has this document been prepared? This document has been prepared to help Board members, management and other employees understand how NHS Lothian s system of corporate governance, risk
More informationHuman Resources Policy Framework. Management of Attendance Policy and Procedure
Human Resources Policy Framework Management of Attendance Policy and Procedure Approved by: Cabinet Resources Panel (15.12.2015) revised Cabinet Resources Panel (27.11.2012) original Published: 01.01.2016
More informationOverarching Information Governance Policy
Document Information Board Library Reference Document Type Document Subject Original Document Author Reviewed By Review Cycle IM&T_01 Policy Information Information IGMG 3 Years Note: This document is
More informationIndividual and Collective Grievances Policy (Replacing Policy Number 073 and 108 Workforce)
Individual and Collective Grievances Policy (Replacing Policy Number 073 and 108 Workforce) POLICY NUMBER TPWF/216 VERSION 1 RATIFYING COMMITTEE DATE RATIFIED DATE OF EQUALITY & HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS
More informationPOLICY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
POLICY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK October 2012 Author: Responsibility: Janet Young, Governance and Risk Manager All Staff Effective Date: ctober 2012 Review Date: October 2014 Reviewing/Endorsing committees
More informationR&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development. NHS Staff Trust-Wide THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT
Document Title: Document Number: Research Protocol Design for Papworth Sponsored Studies SOP019 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by:
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION. Ambulance Operations Manager. EMS Area Manager
JOB DESCRIPTION TITLE: REPORTS TO: KEY RELATIONSHIPS Ambulance Operations Manager EMS Area Manager EMS Area Manager Senior Management Team Locality Managers Clinical Team Leaders NEPTS managers and staff
More informationEAST OF ENGLAND AMBULANCE SERIVCE NHS TRUST HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY 2011 TO 2016
1. Introduction EAST OF ENGLAND AMBULANCE SERIVCE NHS TRUST HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY 2011 TO 2016 1.1 The Trust vision is to be the recognised leader in emergency, urgent and outof-hospital care in the
More informationCAREER BREAK POLICY HR25.CB.1.1. Document Reference. Date Ratified 14 November Release Date 5 February Review Date February 2017
CAREER BREAK POLICY Document Reference Document Status Target Audience HR25.CB.1.1 Final All Staff Date Ratified 14 November 2013 Ratified By Policy Committee Release Date 5 February 2014 Review Date February
More informationEqual Opportunities in Employment
Equal Opportunities in Employment Keywords: Equal Opportunities, Employment Document No: EDH004 Version: 5.1 Developed in Consultation with: Central Policy Group Ratified by: CJNCC Executive Directors
More information